Police officers walked through the dense hedge and discovered the plants, which were hidden by it. The plants were in open areas, thus the farmer had no Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy there.
The main issue here is whether the invasion into the garden that was hidden by shrubs was protected by the Fourth Amendment, despite hints and irrelevant circumstances like the police having no probable cause and peering into the farmer's home.
The location is comparable to an open field, and society does not respect privacy rights in such situations, hence the answer is no.
Regardless of fences, no-trespassing signs (or regulations), the landowner's efforts to keep people out or wants to maintain the privacy, or any other irrational expectation of seclusion. The Fourth Amendment does not apply to areas that are outside of the home's boundaries.
Complete question:
Police officers received an uncorroborated and anonymous tip that a farmer was growing marijuana on his secluded property at the edge of the county line. The police went out to the farm, and finding no one home, looked into the windows of the house, went around the back, and followed a path that led out to the adjacent fields where cattle and horses were grazing. At the farthermost point on the property, about one quarter of a mile from the house, there were about two dozen marijuana plants. The plants were obscured by a high hedge fence, but the officers walked through the hedges and found the plants.
Which of the following statements is the most accurate and appropriate?
(a) The farmer has no Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in the plants because they were contraband.
(b) The farmer has no Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in the plants because they were located in open fields.
(c) The farmer has no Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in the plants because they could readily be observed by aircraft or a helicopter flying at very low altitudes.
(d) Whatever Fourth Amendment expectation the farmer has in the plants, the police had adequate reasonable suspicion to look around the property.
(e) The farmer has a Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in the plants because they fell within an area known as the curtilage.
To learn more about Police officers
https://brainly.com/question/28535644
#SPJ4
indicate whether each statement is true or false regarding action potentials and the all-or-none principle.1. once the threshold is reached, an action potential will proceed without stopping. (click to select)2. the action potentials will be different in different parts of the cell. (click to select)3. if threshold is not reached, an action potential will occur, but it will be weaker. (click to select)4. if threshold is not reached, an action potential will not occur. (click to select)
1. Once the threshold is reached, an action potential will proceed without stopping- True 2. The action potentials will be different in different parts of the cell- False
3. If threshold is not reached, an action potential will occur, but it will be weaker- False 4. If threshold is not reached, an action potential will not occur- True
About Action potential
Whenever the membrane potential of just a particular cell site rapidly increases and decreases, an action potential happens. Following this depolarization, nearby areas also experience depolarization. Excitable cells, these included neurons, muscle cells, as well as certain plant cells, are a class of animal cells that exhibit action potentials. Several endocrine cells, including certain anterior pituitary gland cells and pancreatic beta cells, are excitable cells as well.
To know more about Action potentials:
brainly.com/question/4305583
#SPJ4
Which of the following political arguments would draw most directly on the principles of federalism?
a.Abortion should be illegal under federal law
b. States should determine the legality of abortion within their own borders
c. Abortion should be legal under federal law in all states
d. Abortion should be illegal under religious law
Out of the choices provided above, the statement, ''States should determine the legality of abortion within their own borders.'', is the one that would draw most directly the principles of federalism. Therefore, the option B holds true.
The principles of federalism can be referred to or considered as the set of morale given under the rule of federal government to function in a specific way. These principles of federalism also define the amount of power held by the federal government and the state government, and also define the respective scope for the exercise of their powers.
Learn more about the principles of federalism here:
https://brainly.com/question/29737620
#SPJ4
how did the supreme court extend freedom of speech to protect against acts of state governments in 1925?
Sonya previously worked at Firm A. While she was there, Firm A worked on the Fisher v. Baker case, representing Fisher. Sonya obtained confidential information about the case while at Firm A. Sonya has now moved to Firm B, which represents Baker in the same case. Fisher does not want Sonya or anyone else at Firm B working on the case.
May Sonya's colleagues at Firm B continue to work on Fisher v. Baker?
A. Yes, if they screen Sonya from the case, apportion no part of the fee to Sonya, and give notice and updates to Fisher
B. No, they must withdraw from the case
A. Yes, if they screen Sonya from the case, apportion no part of the fee to Sonya, and give notice and updates to Fisher
If a lawyer who is disqualified from representing a client joins a new firm, the new firm may be disqualified as well unless the lawyer is properly screened. Proper screening means the disqualified lawyer doesn't work on the case, discuss it with those who do, or have access to case files. It also requires that the disqualified lawyer doesn't share fees from the matter, and the former client is given notice (along with periodic certifications of compliance with the screening procedures). Alternatively, the former client can give informed consent, confirmed in writing, but here Fisher has refused to give consent.
Based on the provided information, Firm B can continue to work on Fisher v Baker as proper screening of Sonya, apportion no part of the fee to Sonya, and give notice and updates to Fisher. (Option A)
According to the practice of ethical screening in law, if a lawyer who is disqualified from representing a client joins a new firm, the new firm may be disqualified as well unless the lawyer is properly screened. Ethical screens refer to a system of safeguards and procedures that law firms employ in an attempt to prevent the imputation of a conflict of interest from one or more lawyers or nonlawyers to the rest of the law firm. Hence, proper screening implies that disqualified lawyers refrain from working on the specific case, do not discuss it with those who do, and do not have any access to case files. Furthermore, the disqualified lawyer does not receive a share of the fees from the matter, and the former client is given notice. Alternatively, the former client can give informed consent, confirmed in writing, but in the given case Fisher has refused to give consent.
Learn more about Conflict of interest:
https://brainly.com/question/21648646
#SPJ4
Texa Peace Officer Jutice conducted a warrantle arret of defendant, Grace and charged him with the offene of Aggravated Robbery. Defendant Grace wa tranported in a police unit to the police department. After hi Miranda right were read, but prior to hi tatement, Grace aked the officer that he wa thinking about requeting an attorney. The interview continued and Grace provided a tatement implicating himelf in the robbery. The next morning, Grace wa taking before a magitrate. At hi trial, Grace’ attorney file a Motion to Suppre Statement given by Grace. Dicu the factual and legal iue that will have to be addreed by the Court in deciding whether the tatement will be admiible
Aggravated robbery is a First Degree Felony in Texas, and it carries a maximum punishment of life in prison even for first-time offenders.
This kind of charge is exceedingly detrimental to your long-term criminal record, even if you avoid a lengthy prison term. In these circumstances, your defense cannot be passive.
Armed robbery is a felony offense in several places, although it is classified as aggravated robbery in Texas. When someone tries to steal something (commit theft) and threatens or injures someone in the process, the behavior is referred to as "robbery." If the robber is armed or in possession of a lethal weapon, it becomes "aggravated".
To know more about Aggravated robbery :
https://brainly.com/question/10439349
#SPJ4
Ms. Ellis sold 889 shares of publicly traded Omer stock (tax basis $161,400) for $125,000 cash on July 2. She paid $136,200 cash to purchase 900 Omer shares on August 8. Compute Ms. Ellis' loss recognized on the July 2 sale and determine her tax basis in the 1,000 shares.
Ms. Ellis sold 889 shares of publicly traded Omer stock (tax basis $161,400) for $125,000 cash on July 2. She paid $136,200 cash to purchase 900 Omer shares on August 8. Ms. Ellis's loss recognized on July 2 sale would be $36,400 and her tax basis would be $136200.
Tax basis- For tax purposes, basis often refers to the amount of your property investment in capital terms. Depreciation, depletion, casualty losses, and any gain or loss on the sale, exchange, or other dispose of the property can be calculated using tax basis.
Wash Sale Rule-The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) created the wash sale rule to prevent investors from receiving tax benefits for stocks and other securities traded in. Within 30 days of purchasing or selling equities, investors who engage in wash sales sell their stocks at a loss and then purchase the same securities at the same price. In Ms. Ellis's case is not applicable as she waited for more than a month to recover her Omer stock.
We can learn more about tax basis here:
https://brainly.com/question/29423507#
#SPJ4
white house summit on the state of women in 2016, president barack obamawhite house summit on the state of women in 2016, president barack obama
The United States of Women Summit was a conference promoting equality for women in the US that took place in Washington, D.C.
How would you define gender equality?Every person, regardless of gender, should have equal opportunities, rights, and responsibilities. Everyone is affected by gender inequality, include men, women, transgender & gender nonconforming people, children, and families. People of all ages and races are impacted.
What impact does gender disparity have on society?Globally, gender inequality has a big influence on both mental and physical health. It can reduce people's access to healthcare, raise the prevalence of illness, and shorten life spans. Although it is correct that women survive longer on average than males do, they also have greater lifetime rates of illness.
to know more about gender equality visit :
https://brainly.com/question/28482048
#SPJ4
nativist policies culminated in 1924 legislation limiting immigration to levels below 2% of the 1890 population of all immigrant groups. this was referred to as the
The nativist policies culminated in 1924 legislation limiting immigration to levels below 2% of the 1890 population of all immigrant groups was referred to as the Immigration Act of 1924.
The Immigration Act of 1924 was brought into an enforcement with an intention to form preferences within the population through the creation of a quota system. It can also be stated that this act was formed with the primary purpose of creating differences between the permanent residents and the immigrant groups in the United States.
Learn more about the Immigration Act of 1924 here:
https://brainly.com/question/29790544
#SPJ4
which of the following is an accurate conclusion based on the chart and your knowledge of the impact of lifecycle effects on political attitudes?'
Based on the graph and your understanding of the influence of lifespan impacts on political attitudes, an appropriate conclusion is as people get older, they probably get more conservative.
Political scientists use a variety of methods to gauge Americans' views and opinions. Cultural variables influence political sentiments. Political scientists have seen considerable disparities based on generation, lifecycle stage, or prior experience in addition to differences of opinion between people based on criteria like ethnicity or religion. Last but not least, period effects are caused by significant occurrences or large societal trends (such as the expansion of the internet or the Great Recession that began in 2008) that have an impact on society as a whole. The term "lifecycle effects" refers to the adjustments made to a person's life when they get older, get married, have kids, purchase a house, or retire. Compared to elder Americans, younger Americans tend to be more liberal but less politically engaged.
To learn more about enterotoxins please click on the given link: brainly.com/question/28667423
#SPJ4
Which school of thought for understanding international relations (classical realism, structural realism, liberalism/idealism, radicalism, or constructivism) best reflects a biblical notion of human nature and the role of government?
Of the top five schools of thought, classical realism seeks to emulate a biblical understanding of human nature and the function of the state. After the Second World War, traditional classical realism arose, explaining international relations in terms of human nature.
What is classical realism?In an 1882 critique of Milton's poetry, the phrase "Classical Realism" first arose as a description of literary style.
Its first recorded use in relation to the visual arts was in 1905 when it was used to describe paintings by Masaccio.
Richard Lack, a student of Boston artist R. H. Ives Gemmell in the early 1950s, coined the phrase as the name of a modernist but traditional creative movement.
Ives Gemmell had studied under William McGregor Paxton, and Paxton had studied under Jean-Léon Gerome, a 19th-century French artist.
Lack founded Atelier Lack in 1967 as a studio-school for fine art with inspiration from the Boston Impressionists and the ateliers of 19th-century Paris.
He has educated a sizable number of new painters by the year 1980.
Learn more about classical realism, here
https://brainly.com/question/3687897
#SPJ1
FILL IN THE BLANK. Calista is an enthusiastic gun owner and a supporter of the extensive gun ownership rights. Yet, she is not a member of the National Rifle Association or any other interest groups that lobbies for the rights of gun owners. Calista is _____ the efforts of the NRA and other pro-gun interest groups and their members
Calista is _____ the efforts of the NRA and other pro-gun interest groups and their members: Free riding on.
NRA stands for National Rifle Association. It was established in 1871 by two US Nationwide conflict veterans as a sporting gathering intended to "advance and support rifle firing consistently".
In 1975, it shaped a lobbying arm, the Foundation for Legislative Action, to impact government strategy. Also, in 1977 it shaped its own Political Action Panel (PAC), to channel assets to officials.
The NRA is presently among the most impressive special interest lobby groups in the US, with a significant financial plan to impact individuals from Congress on firearm strategy. It is controlled by chief VP Wayne LaPierre.
Prosecutors are facing a lawful conflict to disintegrate the association, over charges that senior initiatives abused a cause store, involving it for luxurious individual spending. The NRA depicted the claim as a "ridiculous, planned assault".
to know more about legislative click here:
https://brainly.com/question/809346
#SPJ4
which u.s. supreme court case removed mandatory life without the possibility of parole for juvenile offenders who had committed homicide?
Answer:
Having banned the use of the death penalty for juveniles in Roper, the Court left the sentence of life without parole as the harshest sentence available for offenses committed by people under 18. In Graham v. Florida, the Court banned the use of life without parole for juveniles not convicted of homicide.
in marbury v. madison, the supreme court established a principle that would eventually be used by all courts to
A. only the courts may regulate interstate commerce
B. the president may veto federal legislation
C. the courts may declare a federal law unconstitutional
D. only the president may issue an executive order
The concept of judicial review—the ability of federal courts to declare legislative or executive actions unconstitutional—was developed as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court's Marbury v. Madison judgment (1803).
Right, there are seven justices on the Supreme Court:
The Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices are among the Supreme Court's current nine justices. The Court has had 104 Associate Justices throughout its history, with The Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr. serving as its 17th Chief Justice.
How many judges sit on the Supreme Court?
Even the number of justices on the Supreme Court can be decided by Congress; the current court's nine members—one Chief Justice and eight Associate Judges—have only been since 1869, but there have periodically been as few as six justices.
To know more about supreme court visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
police officers received an uncorroborated and anonymous tip that a farmer was growing marijuana on his property. the police went out to the farm, and finding no one home, went around the back, and followed a path that led out to the adjacent fields where cattle and horses were grazing. at the farthest edge of the property there were about two dozen marijuana plants. the plants were obscured by a high hedge fence, but the officers walked through the hedges and found the plants.
This is what southern democrats managed to achieve after the 1876 election. It allowed them to restrict African-American rights, cut taxes, and wipe out social programs.
Following the 1876 election, Southern Democrats were able to pass legislation known as "Home Rule," which gave them the power to curtail African-American rights, lower taxes, and obliterate social programs.
Hayes was a fervent advocate for African Americans' civil rights and the safeguarding of their right to vote, the South was mostly unaffected by his work. When he took office, the only federal forces still defending Republican administrations in the South were confined to a narrow region around state buildings in the capitals of New Orleans and Columbia. Hayes maintained that Democrats in South Carolina and Louisiana had made a commitment to defend the voting and civil rights of Republicans who are black and white. Hayes withdrew the last of the federal troops from the South after getting the Democrats' approval. And white Southerners immediately betrayed their promises, frightening black voters, giving them literacy exams, and charging poll fees in order to prevent them from casting ballots.
To learn more about Home Rule please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/19091591
#SPJ4
a negligence suit, the plaintiff must prove all except which of thefollowing? a. motiveb. duty of carec. actual caused. proximate cause
The plaintiff in a negligence case must establish all elements except (a) motive.
What is negligence?When someone operates a vehicle while impaired by drugs or alcohol and kills someone, this is deemed criminal negligence because it shows severe carelessness on their behalf. Negligence is the legal term for failing to behave in a way that protects society from unjustified danger. The foundation of tort law is negligence, which is a major consideration in the majority of personal injury and property damage cases.
Why is negligence important?The fundamental idea behind negligence is that people should conduct with reasonable care, accounting for any potential harm they may unavoidably do to other persons or property. Someone who experiences loss as a result of another's negligence may be entitled to file a claim for damages to make up for their suffering. A person can be sued under negligence law for injury they unintentionally or recklessly caused you. When someone's acts or inaction fall below a reasonable level of care, it is considered to be negligent.
To know more about Negligence visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12177947
#SPJ4
under the postal reorganization act of 1970, a recipient of unsolicited merchandise has no obligation to the sender.
The aforementioned statement is accurate; according to the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970, any unsolicited mail-order goods are free for the recipient to use however they like, with no responsibility on the recipient's part to the sender.
The United States Postal Service was established as a corporation-like independent agency authorized by the US government as an official service for mail delivery in the US after the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970, a law passed by the US Congress, abolished the former United States Post Office Department, which was a part of the Cabinet. On August 12, 1970, President Richard Nixon signed the Act into law. The primary duty of the Postal Service must be to render postal services for the purpose of facilitating the personal, academic, literary, and commercial correspondence of the people in order to unite the Nation. It must offer customers in all locations timely, dependable, and effective services, as well as postal services to all communities. The expenditures of starting and running the Postal Service may not be distributed in a way that reduces the value of the service to the public as a whole.
To learn more about Postal Reorganization Act please click on the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/24239286
#SPJ4
the texas regulars, a group within the texas democratic party, opposed which of the following?
An organization known as the Texas Regulars was founded in order to prevent Franklin D. Roosevelt from winning a majority of the Electoral College in the 1944 presidential election.
What challenge do Texas Democrats currently face?They must take advantage of gerrymandering's benefits in order to maintain their precarious hold on the majority in the Texas senate. In Texas, where the Republican party holds majorities in both the house and senate, they must reassert their political presence.
Quizlet In the contemporary age, why did so many Texans defect from the Democratic Party?Texas's political landscape evolved from being dominated by Democrats to being dominated by Republicans as a result of the state's residents adopting a far more conservative worldview.
To Know more about presidential election.
https://brainly.com/question/10750361
#SPJ4
a(n) has the force of law but requires congressional approval, whereas a(n) does not require congressional approval but is easier for the next administration to ignore. group of answer choices
Executive orders are not laws, and Congress does not have to approve them. An executive order is one of the most often used "presidential" papers in our current system of governance.
The distinction between the executive branch and other branches of government characterizes the presidential system. The elected head of state serves as an advisor to the legislature but is not a member of it. The president typically has a variety of different sorts of authority. a form of governance where the president is legally separate from the legislative. Executive orders are documents that the president can issue to direct executive offices or to explain and advance current laws. Additionally, the President has the authority to grant clemencies and pardons for federal offences. Few other democracies, including Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and the Philippines, have adopted the presidential system, which was invented and is best known for in the United States.
Learn more about presidential here
https://brainly.com/question/4121241
#SPJ4
a legal document stating that life sustaining procedures shall not be used to prolong a person's life when death is imminent is called a(n)
A legal document stating that life sustaining procedures shall not be used to prolong a person's life when death is imminent is called an advance directive.
What is meant by an advance directive?It is a legal document that outlines a person's intentions regarding medical treatment in the event that they become incapacitated due to a major illness or injury.
In the event that you are unable to make your own healthcare decisions, an advance directive is a legal document that outlines your preferences to your doctor.
An advance directive, however, is a useful method to communicate your preferences for medical care, clear up any misunderstandings with your family and caregivers, and ensure that your intentions are respected.
Read more on advance directive here:https://brainly.com/question/29374150
#SPJ1
item 36 the 1957 supreme court decision of blank attempted to establish precise guidelines for deciding when a book, movie, or magazine would be considered obscene.
The 1957 Supreme Court decision of Roth v United States attempted to establish precise guidelines for deciding when a book, movie or magazine would be considered obscene.
The common law rule that was before Roth stated that any content that had the potential to "deprave and corrupt those whose minds are subject to such immoral influences" were considered "obscene". A publisher was charged in the Roth case under a federal provision that made it illegal to mail an offensive book. After a jury trial in District Court, Roth was found guilty, and the verdict was upheld on appeal. This important Supreme Court decision from 1957 helped establish a legal standard for deciding whether or not anything obscene is covered by the First Amendment. In the early half of the 20th century, courts struggled to define obscenity.
We can learn more about Roth v United States here:
https://brainly.com/question/14990097#
#SPJ4
which statement accurately summarizes how constituencies affect the campaign strategy of candidates running for the us senate or house of representatives?
Possibility for House locale should consider explicit necessities and basic issues that portray a generally modest number of electors. Candidates for House regions should consider explicit requirements and basic issues that portray a generally modest number of citizens.
For the most part, Constituents are individuals who live in the space that a chosen official addresses, while electors are constituents who cast a voting form for a specific up-and-comer.
All in all, Candidates for House regions are expected to think about the specific worries and subjects that mean a lot to a to some degree concentrated gathering of citizens.
Learn more about senate:
https://brainly.com/question/7920667
#SPJ4
What case set a precedent for the Supreme Court to rule a law as violating the Constitution?
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Marbury v. Madison
Tinker v. Des Moines
Wisconsin v. Yoder
The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).
The most popular force of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the capacity of the Court to pronounce a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not tracked down inside the text of the actual Constitution. The Court established this principle on account of Marbury v. Madison (1803).
For this situation, the Court needed to conclude whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme rule that everyone must follow. The Legal executive Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court unique jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legitimate requests convincing government authorities to act as per the law). A suit was brought under this Act, however the Supreme Court noticed that the Constitution didn't allow the Court to have unique jurisdiction in this. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Rule that everyone must follow, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is in opposition to the Constitution couldn't stand. In ensuing cases, the Court additionally established its position to strike down state regulations viewed as in violation of the Constitution.
to know more about the supreme court click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
After acquiring three new rental properties, Savannah made improvements to them. In the first property, she installed ceiling fans in each bedroom. In the second, she laid out decorative throw rugs in the living room. In the third, she had a new central air unit installed. Six months later, she decides to sell the properties and is wondering which of these improvements she can remove from the properties and keep for herself. Of the three improvements, Savannah CANNOT remove: a. all three improvements because they would be considered fixtures that become part of the real property b. the ceiling fans and central air unit, but their classification as fixtures would make no difference in whether or not Savannah can remove them c. the ceiling fans and central air unit because they would be considered fixtures d. the central air unit and the throw rugs because they would be considered fixtures
As indicated by Erikson, she is being generative.
Clarification:
As indicated by Erikson's Phases of Psychosocial Advancement, Savannah is in the Generativity versus Stagnation Stage. It is fixated on either tracking down another significance forever and being generative with people in the future or falling into stagnation and losing a reason throughout everyday life.
Savannah is being generative since she is focused on further developing society through her association with her youngsters and grandkids. She accepts she is making the world a superior spot, leaving it better for people in the future; she is adding to them.
Learn more about Savannah:
https://brainly.com/question/14953709
#SPJ4
why was this case one of the most important cases the supreme court has ever decided?
Scrum and kanban boards, agile reporting, and project estimating for any agile methodology are just a few of the agile project management tools available in Jira Software.
what is software?The U.S. Supreme Court used the concept of "judicial review" for the first time in Marbury v. Madison, probably the most significant case in the court's history. This principle gives federal courts the authority to invalidate actions of Congress that are in violation of the Constitution.
The significance of the Marbury case in Supreme Court history is explained.
The concept of judicial review—the ability of federal courts to find legislative and executive actions unconstitutional—was established by the American Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803). Chief Justice John Marshall authored the unified opinion.
To know more about project visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29564005
#SPJ4
which of these would disqualify someone from claiming innocent landowner immunity under the superfund amendments and reauthorization act (sara)?
A landowner had only constructive knowledge of the damage is the correct answer.
What is difference between landlord and landowner?A landlord is not necessarily the property owner. The owner of a rental property can be involved in every aspect of the rental process, or he can give someone else the power to act in his stead.
What is the role of a landowner?Landowners are people and businesses that own or have an interest in, the various parcels of land and buildings in your neighbourhood area. Examples might include vacant or derelict sites or buildings, farmland, residential property, industrial units, shops, or woods and green space.
To know more about landowner visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29672910
#SPJ4
_______the growth of international and regional mechanisms of government has intensified globalization. identify each statement as true of the united nations or of the european union.
The expansion of regional and international governance structures is one significant political development that is accelerating globalization.
Economic globalization is the term used to describe the rising interdependence of world economies as a result of the expansion of international capital flows, the wide and quick diffusion amount of cross-border trade in commodities and services, and the level of technology. It is an unstoppable trend for the global economic development at the turn of the millennium and shows the ongoing expansion and mutual integration of market borders. The two main forces driving economic globalization are the marketization and the rapidly increasing use of information in all forms of productive activities. As a result of the environment in which the market economic system has been rapidly spreading throughout the world, the world's economies have been rapidly globalizing in recent years. This development has been based on the increasing cross-border division of labor that has been permeating down to the level of production chains within enterprises of different countries.
To learn more about Economic globalization please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/17284624
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. texas places heavy restrictions on the use of____, the process whereby the government can take private land for a public purpose with compensation.
Texas places heavy restrictions on the use of eminent domain, the process whereby the government can take private land for a public purpose with compensation.
Expropriation is the act of a state, provincial, or federal government seizing private property for public use. Eminent domain, land acquisition, forced purchase/acquisition, resumption, resumption/compulsory acquisition, and expropriation are other terms for this power.
The ability of the government to seize private property and put it to use for the general public is referred to as eminent domain. According to the Fifth Amendment, the government may only use this authority provided it compensates the property owners fairly.
Constitutional restrictions on the eminent domain power include requirements that the property be taken for "public use;"
No person's property may be taken away from them without following the correct legal procedures; the state must provide "fair compensation" in exchange for the property.
To know more about eminent domain: https://brainly.com/question/2093245
#SPJ4
FILL IN THE BLANK. after falwell's organization disbanded, a new organization called the___focused less on national campaigns and more on grassroots local politics.
After Falwell's organization disbanded, a new organization called the Moral Majority focused less on national campaigns and more on grassroots local politics.
What was the Moral Majority?
Moral Majority, founded in 1979, was an American political organization associated with the Christian right and Republican Party. The political action group that jerry Falwell lead is the Moral Majority.
Which political action group that was led by Falwell?
The Moral Majority which is an American political organization was led by jerry Falwell around 1980s and this group was been referred to a group that was linked with Christian right .
Therefore, Moral Majority is the political action group that jerry Falwell who was a Baptist minister.
learn more about political group at;
brainly.com/question/633543
#SPJ4
During an investigation, police officers find illegal drugs while searching a home for which they did not acquire a warrant. Which of the following would prevent the drugs from being used as evidence at trial?
The exclusionary rule
During an investigation, police officers find illegal drugs while searching a home for which they did not acquire a warrant. The exclusionary rule would prevent the drugs from being used as evidence at trial.
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle based on constitutional law in the United States that forbids the use of evidence gathered or examined in defiance of the defendant's constitutional-rights in a court of law. This might be viewed as an illustration of a preventative rule created by the judiciary to safeguard a constitutional right. The Fifth Amendment's prohibitions that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself" and that no person "shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law" may be considered to directly follow from the Constitution in some instances, if not all.
For more info about 'exclusionary rule' click on below link - https://brainly.com/question/28899354
#SPJ4