Answer:The Union had the advantage of a larger population, superior industrial and transportation capabilities, and a strong navy, while the Confederacy had the advantage of fighting on their home territory and having more experienced military leaders. These strengths and weaknesses ultimately contributed to the Union's victory, as their superior resources allowed them to outlast and overcome the Confederacy's initial advantages.
Explanation:
The Union had more people and better resources for war, such as factories and ships, while the Confederacy had experienced military leaders and was fighting on their own land. However, the Union's advantages in resources allowed them to ultimately win the war despite the Confederacy's initial strengths.
Answer:
The American Civil War was a complex conflict that lasted from 1861 to 1865. Both the Union and the Confederacy had their strengths and weaknesses, which played a crucial role in determining the outcome of the war. Here are some of the key strengths and weaknesses of each side and how they contributed to the war's outcome:
Union:
Strengths:
Industrial and economic power: The Union had a more robust and more diversified economy than the Confederacy. It had more significant manufacturing capabilities, better transportation infrastructure, and more extensive financial resources, giving it a significant advantage in the war.
Population and manpower: The Union had a population of 22 million, compared to the Confederacy's nine million. This meant that the Union had a more extensive pool of potential soldiers and could quickly replace losses on the battlefield.
Navy: The Union had a more substantial navy, which enabled it to control the seas and blockade Confederate ports. This prevented the Confederacy from exporting its cotton and importing weapons and other supplies.
Weaknesses:
Military leadership: The Union struggled to find competent military leaders at the beginning of the war. It took some time for General Ulysses S. Grant to emerge as a capable and successful leader.
Fighting on unfamiliar terrain: The Union army had to fight on unfamiliar terrain in the South, which was difficult for soldiers who were used to fighting in the North.
Confederacy:
Strengths:
Military leadership: The Confederacy had some of the best military leaders of the time, including Generals Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson.
Fighting on familiar terrain: Confederate soldiers were familiar with the terrain of the South, which gave them an advantage over Union soldiers.
Motivation and commitment: The Confederacy had a strong commitment to their cause and was highly motivated to fight for their independence.
Weaknesses:
Economy and industry: The Confederacy had an agrarian economy, with limited industrial capabilities, making it difficult to sustain the war effort.
Population and manpower: The Confederacy had a smaller population than the Union, making it challenging to replace losses on the battlefield.
Lack of resources: The Confederacy lacked many of the resources necessary to fight a prolonged war, such as weapons, ammunition, and medical supplies.
In conclusion, the Union's strengths in industrial and economic power, population and manpower, and navy ultimately contributed to its victory in the war. Conversely, the Confederacy's strengths in military leadership, fighting on familiar terrain, and motivation and commitment were not enough to overcome its weaknesses in the economy and industry, population and manpower, and lack of resources.
Explanation:
What was the reaction from many of these soldiers to the announcement that there was going to be an armistice (ceasefire) and that the war was over
The reaction to the announcement of an armistice varied depending on the individual soldier and their personal experiences during the war.
The announcement of an armistice or ceasefire during the war was a welcome relief for many soldiers who had been fighting for extended periods of time. The war had taken a significant toll on their physical and mental well-being, and the announcement of the end of hostilities was a ray of hope in an otherwise bleak situation.
For many soldiers, the news of an armistice meant that they would finally be able to return home to their families and loved ones. The prospect of being reunited with their loved ones after months or even years of separation was a source of immense joy and relief for many.
However, not all soldiers were thrilled with the news of an armistice. Some soldiers felt that the end of the war was premature, and that the conflict could have been resolved differently. Others were concerned about the fate of their comrades who had been injured or killed in the fighting.
Overall, the reaction to the announcement of an armistice varied depending on the individual soldier and their personal experiences during the war. However, for many, the news was a long-awaited reprieve from the horrors of war and a chance to start rebuilding their lives.
For more such questions on individual soldier
https://brainly.com/question/30647243
#SPJ11
27. Which term best characterizes Woodrow Wilson's approach to American foreign policy diplomacy?
a. imperialistic
b. moralistic
c. realistic
d. balance-of-power
e. isolationist
Germany's hyperinflation after World War I was primarily due to the rapid increase in the supply of money.
The rapid increase in the supply of money was one of the main factors that contributed to hyperinflation in Germany after World War I, but it was not the only factor.
Other elements that led to Germany's hyperinflation included:
War reparations: Following World War I, Germany was required to pay enormous reparations to the Allied nations.
Economic Instability: During this period, Germany had significant economic instability, which was compounded by the effects of World War I.
Political Instability: During this time period, Germany experienced tremendous political instability, with multiple different governments coming and exiting.
Speculation: Speculators also contributed to hyperinflation by stockpiling goods and assets in expectation of future price hikes.
For such more question on hyperinflation:
https://brainly.com/question/30780353
#SPJ11
19. The Sixteenth Amendment provided for
a. a personal income tax.
b. direct election of senators.
c. prohibition.
d. woman suffrage.
e. abolition of child labor.
Identify at least six methods the President was accused of using to cover up the June 17, 1972 break-in at Watergate.
The President was accused of using a variety of methods to cover up the June 17, 1972 break-in at Watergate.
These included paying hush money to the burglars, ordering the CIA to block the FBI investigation into the burglary, pressuring the FBI to drop their investigation, firing the Watergate Special Prosecutor, lying to the American public about his involvement in the break-in, and destroying evidence related to the burglary.
He was also accused of making false statements to the press, covering up the involvement of other White House staff, and diverting attention away from the burglary by creating an “enemies list” and using other methods to harass his political opponents. All of these alleged actions were eventually used to support the articles of impeachment against the President.
To know more about Watergate, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11778920
#SPJ1
What Egyptian trade routes were easier to follow and why?
The Nile River was the most important trade route in Ancient Egypt, as it provided a convenient transportation route through the heart of the country. The Nile River flows from the south to the north, and its current made it easier for ships to travel upstream.
This made it possible for merchants to transport goods from Nubia and other southern regions to the delta region in the north. The Nile also provided a source of water for irrigation, which made it possible for farmers to grow crops along its banks.
The other major trade routes in Egypt were the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. The Red Sea provided access to the Arabian Peninsula and East Africa, while the Mediterranean Sea offered a connection to Europe and the rest of the Mediterranean world.
To know more about Egyptian routes:
https://brainly.com/question/20071624
#SPJ4
What did Einstein believe regarding human perception?
© What humans perceive with their senses is not always true.
• Human perception can be explained through psychoanalysis.
• Human emotion and behavior are results of what humans perceive.
• Dream analysis can help explain why humans see things differently.
Answer:
A.) What humans perceive with their senses is not always true.
Explanation:
Einstein believed that what humans perceive with their senses is not always true. He recognized that human perception is limited and can be easily fooled by optical illusions, cultural biases, and other factors. He argued that to truly understand the universe, one must rely on objective scientific observation and use logical reasoning to interpret the data. In other words, he believed that human perception is fallible and that we must use critical thinking and empirical evidence to arrive at accurate conclusions about the world.
How did the differing ideologies of the United States and the Soviet Union impact global interactions in the late twentieth century
The differing ideologies of the United States and the Soviet Union, specifically the ideological divide between capitalism and communism, shaped global interactions in the late twentieth century in a number of ways.
This divide led to the Cold War, a period of intense political and economic tension between the two superpowers, which impacted the world in a number of ways. Firstly, the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in a global competition for political and economic influence, which led to a number of proxy wars in various regions of the world. For example, the Vietnam War, the Korean War, and conflicts in Afghanistan, Angola, and Nicaragua were all seen as proxy wars between the two superpowers.
Learn more about “ capitalism and communism, “ visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/12179941
#SPJ4
Question:
How did the differing ideologies of the United States and the Soviet Union impact global interactions in the late twentieth century?
Answer: The United States promoted democracy, capitalism, and individual freedom, while the Soviet Union promoted communism, state control of the economy, and collective equality.These conflicting ideologies contributed to the emergence of the Cold War, which was characterized by political tension, military rivalry, and ideological competition between the two superpowers and their respective allies.The Cold War had global implications, as the United States and the Soviet Union competed for influence in various regions of the world through proxy wars, alliances, and aid programs.The fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 marked the end of the Cold War and a shift in global power dynamics, as the United States emerged as the sole superpower and global leader of the capitalist democratic system.
Explanation: This information can be found in textbooks, or online, using trusted sources such as, .org, .edu, etc.
What did the state and federal governments do to encourage railroad construction in the decades after the Civil War?
In the decades following the Civil War, both state and federal governments provided a range of incentives to encourage railroad construction.
The federal government provided subsidies in the form of land grants and loans to railroad companies through legislation such as the Pacific Railroad Acts of 1862 and 1864. State governments also offered subsidies and tax breaks to railroad companies to encourage them to build lines within their borders. Additionally, many states passed laws allowing railroads to claim private property through eminent domain, which facilitated the acquisition of land for rail lines. These incentives helped spur the rapid expansion of railroads across the United States, particularly in the West. The expansion of railroads had significant economic and social effects, making transportation of goods and people faster, cheaper, and more efficient, and contributing to the growth of industries and settlement in new areas.
Learn more about legislation here:
https://brainly.com/question/29804648
#SPJ11
Which statement explains why the Supreme Court made this declaration?
The Supreme Court made the declaration because constitution guarantees right to privacy for all the citizens.
What is a declaration?Declaration refers to the series of important declarations made throughout human history that have had significant impacts on politics, society, and culture. Some of the most notable declarations include the Magna Carta, which established the principle of limited government in England in 1215; the Declaration of Independence, which declared the American colonies independent from Great Britain in 1776; and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was adopted by the United Nations in 1948 and outlined basic human rights that should be protected globally. These declarations often represent turning points in history and have helped shape the world as we know it today. They have also served as inspiration for other declarations and movements seeking to promote justice, equality, and freedom.
To learn more about declaration, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2159173
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Which statement explains why the Supreme Court made declaration?
A. The Constitution guarantees a right to privacy for all citizens.
B. The Constitution implies protections for rights that are not directly mentioned.
C. The Constitution requires equal protection of the laws for all groups of people.
D. The Constitution grants voting rights to all citizens regardless of race or ethnicity.
________ devised a system that could be taught to others for achieving the kind of believability demanded by the new realistic drama being written in the late nineteenth century.
Stanislavski devised a system that could be taught to others for achieving the kind of believability demand by the new realistic drama being written in the late nineteenth century.
Stanislavski's method, commonly known as the "Method," emphasised emotional authenticity and psychological realism in acting. He felt that performers should attempt to thoroughly inhabit their characters, to feel their emotions, and to act in accordance with their characters' thoughts, feelings, and intentions.
The Method incorporated a variety of skills, such as emotional memory, sensory awareness, and improvisation, and it emphasised the significance of meticulous preparation and rehearsal. Stanislavski's approach was created to assist performers in developing fully realised characters who were convincing and emotionally relevant for audiences.
For such more question on demand:
https://brainly.com/question/2398546
#SPJ11
COMPARE AND CONTRAST: In the letter from Nurse Cornelia Hancock to her mother, she discusses the personal costs of the Civil War from her perspective. President Lincoln's address on the Gettysburg battlefield was a public speech prepared for the nation. In what ways do the authors of the poem, letter, and speech form opinions and make arguments and claims about America? How are their arguments alike or different?
The authors of poem, letter, and speech form opinions and make arguments and claims about America in different ways, as their works vary in form and purpose in the battles.
What are battles?Battles are violent confrontations between two or more groups with opposing goals, typically fought using weapons and military tactics. They can take place on land, at sea, or in the air and can range in scale from small skirmishes to large-scale conflicts involving thousands of soldiers. Battles can have significant historical, cultural, and political significance, often shaping the course of nations and societies. They are typically fought to achieve specific strategic objectives, such as capturing territory or resources, defending against invasion, or achieving political or ideological goals. Battles can have profound and lasting effects on the lives of those involved, causing physical and emotional trauma, and often resulting in death or injury for soldiers and civilians alike.
To learn more about battles, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30150803
#SPJ1
How is Hamlet's anger towards ignorance demonstrated?
Hamlet's anger towards ignorance is demonstrated in several ways throughout the play. A notable examples is in his soliloquy in Act II, Scene 2, where he criticizes the actors who are performing for the court.
"O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I! Is it not monstrous that this player here, But in a fiction, in a dream of passion, Could force his soul so to his own conceit That from her working all his visage wanned, Tears in his eyes, distraction in's aspect, A broken voice, and his whole function suiting With forms to his conceit? And all for nothing!"
In this passage, Hamlet is expressing his frustration with his own inability to take action and his sense of shame and inadequacy in comparison to the actors. He sees their passion and ability to bring their characters to life as a rebuke to his own inaction and lack of conviction.
Overall, Hamlet's anger towards ignorance is a key theme of the play. He is frustrated by the inability of those around him to see the truth and take action, and he sees ignorance as a barrier to justice and morality.
Learn more about Hamlet:
https://brainly.com/question/30233371
#SPJ11
what is the short term results and long term implications of new artillery wwi?
What is Lebensraum (AKA: living space)?
Lebensraum, which is German for "living space," was a concept that played a key role in Nazi Germany's territorial expansion and foreign policy in the years leading up to and during World War II.
The notion of Lebensraum was based on the belief that the Germans were a superior race that required more living space to feed their rising population and gain economic and political domination in Europe.
In Hitler's mind, this meant extending Germany's borders eastward into "inferior" Slavic territories. Hitler felt that by taking these regions, Germany would get access to the resources it required to attain economic and military self-sufficiency.
The Nazi regime also sought to establish a "new order" in Europe, with Germans at the top of a racial hierarchy and the rest of the world serving as subordinate or slave populations.
For such more question on Nazi Germany:
https://brainly.com/question/21827785
#SPJ11
Which sentence best states a difference between the article and the lecture?
A. The article examines court opinion about the green belt movements while the lecture is an overview of Mathai's life.
B. The articles make general statement about Mathai, while the lecture specific projects imitated by the green belt movements.
C. the articles discusses details about the green belt movements in over of importance, while the lecture divides information Mathi by topic
D. The articles describes how Mathai become influential, while the lecture provides a participants of green belt movements.
The article examines court opinion about the green belt movements while the lecture is an overview of Mathai's life sentence best states a difference between the article and the lecture. Thus, option (a) is correct.
While the lecture gives an outline of Mathai's life, the article concentrates on judicial rulings regarding the green belt movements. In Kenya, Wangari Maathai established the green belt movement in 1977. It was a grassroots environmental campaign.
The movement's primary goals were the empowerment of women, the promotion of environmental preservation, and the planting of trees. In Kenya, the movement was successful in supporting sustainable development and increasing awareness of environmental issues.
As a result, the significance of the sentence best states a difference between the article and the lecture are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on article, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14172780
#SPJ1
Which of the following was not one of the key defining elements of the counter culture movement?
embracing rock and roll music
drug use
a new focus on sexual freedom
conservative political view
Answer: conservative political view
Explanation:
Which was the largest ethnic group in the western mining district of the U.S. in the late nineteenth century?
In the late nineteenth century, the largest ethnic group in the western mining district of the United States was the Chinese.
Chinese immigrants came to the western United States in large numbers during the mid-to-late nineteenth century to work in industries such as mining, railroad construction, and agriculture.In the mining districts of the American West, Chinese laborers played a significant role in extracting gold, silver, and other valuable minerals from the earth. They were often employed in the most dangerous and difficult aspects of mining work, such as tunneling, blasting, and hauling heavy loads. Chinese miners also established their own communities within mining towns, often living and working in segregated areas of the town.The Chinese faced significant discrimination and prejudice in the western United States during this period, including violent attacks and legal restrictions on their rights and opportunities. Despite these challenges, Chinese immigrants continued to play a crucial role in the development of the American West, contributing their labor, skills, and cultural traditions to the region.
Learn more about largest here:https://brainly.com/question/22559105
#SPJ11
Help me please!! Due today! It about a movie “All the president’s Men”
4. Select an action performed by one of the characters in the film
and explain why the character took that action. What motivated him/her? What did this motivation have to do with the theme of the film?
5. Did all of the events portrayed in the film ring true? Describe a scene you found especially accurate. Which sequence(s) didn't seem to match reality? Why?
6. Did you learn anything from the movie? What was it? Be specific and use an
example from the
movie.
Read a free sample of Bob Woodward's and Carl Bernstein's book All the President's Men. On the internet, iPad, iPhone, and Android, read millions of eBooks and audiobooks.
What is the topic of the book The President's Men?Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, two of the reporters who looked into the June 1972 break-in at the Watergate Office Building and the ensuing political scandal for The Washington Post, wrote the nonfiction book All the President's Men in 1974.
Why is All the President's Men important literature?They exemplified the ability of journalists to make people answerable for their actions. They also showed how important journalistic freedom is. Would have happened if the Post hadn't run this piece is impossible to know. The governing class would still be in power.
To know more about All the President's Men visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29228757
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements about Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is true?
A) It forbids discrimination in hiring, firing, and all aspects of the employment relationship.
B) Private-sector employees are not covered under Title VII.
C) It prohibits religious organizations from discriminating in employment on the basis of religion.
D) Private clubs are not exempt from Title VII.
Answer:
I think it's A
how did Rome's lower class veiw Julius Caesar?
Answer:
Hero
Explanation:
Analyze how women’s identity was influenced by both peacetime and wartime experiences in the period from 1900 to 1945.What was a woman’s role during peacetime?What was a woman’s role during wartime?How did their roles change?
Women’s identity in the period from 1900 to 1945 was profoundly influenced by both peacetime and wartime experiences.
During peacetime, women were expected to fulfill traditional roles such as homemakers, wives and mothers, often with limited access to education and employment. Women were largely excluded from politics and were denied the right to vote in many places. During wartime, women were increasingly called upon to take on new roles such as factory workers, nurses and even military personnel.
This enabled them to gain more independence and access to greater educational and employment opportunities. In addition, as men went off to war, women had to take on the responsibility of managing households and farms, and thereby gained greater respect and recognition. Thus, women’s roles changed significantly during this period, as they moved away from traditional roles to become more independent and empowered.
To know more about wartime , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30188182
#SPJ4
The colony of New Netherland was marked by a 1. large, remarkably diverse population. 2. large population consisting almost exclusively of people from France and Spain. 3. small, remarkably homogeneous population. 4. small, remarkably diverse population.
The colony of New Netherland was marked by a B. large, remarkably diverse population.
The Dutch West India Company established New Netherland in 1624, and its main settlement was New Amsterdam, which later became New York City. The Dutch encouraged people from various European nations to settle in the colony, as they aimed to create a thriving trade center. As a result, New Netherland attracted settlers from not only the Netherlands, but also France, Germany, Scandinavia, and other parts of Europe.
This cultural diversity was further amplified by the presence of Native American tribes and enslaved Africans who were brought to the colony. The different ethnicities, religions, and languages in the colony fostered a unique environment, where tolerance and cooperation were necessary for survival and prosperity.
Although the Dutch controlled New Netherland, they allowed a degree of religious freedom and self-governance, which contributed to the colony's diverse population. In 1664, the English captured New Netherland and renamed it New York, but the legacy of its diverse population continued to shape the region's development in the centuries that followed. Therefore, the correct option is B.
The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:
The colony of New Netherland was marked by a
a. large population consisting almost exclusively of people from France and Spain
b. large remarkably diverse population
c. small, remarkably diverse population
d. small, remarkably homogeneous population
Know more about New Netherland here:
https://brainly.com/question/17258142
#SPJ11
What was the Republican Party's motivation for nominating Andrew Johnson for vice president?
The Republican Party's motivation for nominating Andrew Johnson for vice president was to create a national unity ticket for the presidential election of 1864 during the American Civil War.
The Civil War had been raging for three years at the time, and President Abraham Lincoln was running for re-election. Lincoln belonged to the Republican Party, which was mostly made up of northerners who opposed slavery and backed the Union cause during the war.
Lincoln's Republican Party nominated Andrew Johnson, a Democratic senator from Tennessee who had stayed faithful to the Union, as his running partner in an effort to extend his support and appeal to Democrats who were loyal to the Union.
For such more question on Civil War:
https://brainly.com/question/1020924
#SPJ11
This Charlestonian is the first woman to be elected to West Virginia's executive branch of government.
Answer:
Betty Ireland
Explanation:
From 2005-2009.
5. Once the British burned down boers homes and farms, they sent remaining families to
concentration camps during the Second Boer War. These camps were overcrowded and unsanitary, resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands of Boer women and children due to disease and malnutrition. The British government claimed that the camps were established to protect Boer civilians from the fighting, but the appalling conditions and high death toll sparked international outrage and criticism. The use of concentration camps during the war has since been widely condemned as a violation of human rights and a dark chapter in British colonial history.
~~~Harsha~~~
What environmental event occurred at about the same time that the Indus Valley civilization suffered a collapse:
The collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization can be attributed to climate change and its subsequent impact on monsoon patterns. This environmental event disrupted agriculture, water resources, trade, and communication within the civilization, ultimately leading to its decline.
The environmental event that occurred around the same time as the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization was climate change, specifically a significant shift in monsoon patterns. This change led to a decrease in rainfall, which in turn caused severe droughts and reduced the availability of water resources. The Indus Valley Civilization, which thrived between 2600 and 1900 BCE, was highly dependent on the predictable monsoon rains for agriculture and sustenance. As the climate shifted, the monsoon patterns became erratic and less reliable. This impacted crop yields and the civilization's food supply, ultimately contributing to its decline. Moreover, the drying up of the rivers, especially the Saraswati River, led to a decrease in trade and communication among various settlements in the region. The reduced water supply also contributed to the decline of urban centers, forcing people to abandon their cities and move to smaller, rural settlements.
Learn more about Indus Valley Civilization here
https://brainly.com/question/2263593
#SPJ11
How did the Porfiriato work to attract the FDI? (Foreign Direct Investment)
During the Porfiriato, which refers to the period of Mexican history from 1876 to 1911 when Porfirio Diaz was in power, the government implemented various policies to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) into the country.
One of the main ways they did this was through the promotion of infrastructure development, such as railways and telegraph lines, which helped to facilitate trade and communication. They also lowered tariffs and taxes on imported goods, making it easier for foreign businesses to operate in Mexico.
In addition, the government encouraged the establishment of foreign-owned companies by offering them concessions and subsidies, as well as protecting their investments through legal and regulatory measures. Diaz's regime also ensured political stability and security for foreign investors, which further enhanced Mexico's appeal as an investment destination.
Overall, the Porfiriato worked to attract FDI by creating a favorable business environment that prioritized economic growth and development. While these policies did benefit foreign investors, they also had negative consequences for many Mexicans, particularly the rural and working-class populations who experienced exploitation and inequality under the Porfirian regime.
To learn more about Porfiriato, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/22300152
#SPJ11
why did president johnson station warships off the dominican coast, use the cia to help engineer a truck drivers' strike that paralyzed chile, and use the cia to urge the chilean military to take action?
Answer:
President Johnson ordered the stationing of warships off the Dominican coast and the intervention of US troops in the Dominican Republic in 1965 to prevent a perceived communist threat and to stabilize the political situation in the country. In Chile, it was President Nixon who ordered the CIA to engineer a truck drivers' strike in 1972 to put pressure on the government of President Salvador Allende, who had been democratically elected and was seen as a socialist and a potential threat to US interests in the region.
In the case of the Dominican Republic, Johnson was concerned about the possible establishment of a communist government in the country following a military coup that had overthrown the democratically elected president. Johnson believed that such a government could have implications for US national security interests in the Caribbean region. The intervention of US troops in the Dominican Republic was intended to prevent the establishment of a communist government and to stabilize the situation in the country.
In the case of Chile, the Nixon administration was concerned about the election of President Allende, who was seen as a socialist and a potential threat to US economic interests in the region. The truck drivers' strike was one of several covert operations carried out by the CIA to undermine Allende's government and to create instability in the country. The goal of the Nixon administration was to remove Allende from power and to replace him with a more pro-US government. Ultimately, this strategy led to the military coup in Chile in 1973, which resulted in the installation of a right-wing military dictatorship that was supported by the US government.
Explanation:
Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(07.07 MC)
According to Soviet leadership, what was the only way of ensuring a lasting peace in the world?
Keeping Germany weak
A revolution replacing capitalist elites with a global classless society
A strong United Nations Security Council
Free liberal democracies rather than monarchies throughout the world
Correct option is [B],
According to Soviet leadership, the only way of ensuring a lasting peace in the world was through a revolution replacing capitalist elites with a global classless society.
This idea was based on the Marxist theory of communism, which called for the overthrow of the capitalist class by the working class and the establishment of a socialist society that would eventually evolve into a classless communist society.
Learn more about Soviet leadership
https://brainly.com/question/29763392