In 451 BCE, the first written law code for Rome was publicly displayed. Laws were written on twelve bronze tablets and posted in the Roman Forum.
How did this event most likely affect Roman society?
Responses
Rights were made clearer.
Rights were made clearer.
Political conflict increased.
Political conflict increased.
Social classes were created.
Social classes were created.
Education became less important.
Answer:Before the Romans, the rule of law was unfamiliar to people. In 451 b.c., Rome adopted its first written code of laws known as the Twelve Tables. The laws were carved on twelve bronze tablets and placed in Rome's marketplace, called the Forum (FOHR • uhm).
Explanation:
If a section of the Constitution is no longer in use, that is nearly always because it has been
If a section of the Constitution is no longer in use, that is nearly always because it has been repealed or superseded by subsequent amendments or laws.
The United States Constitution can only be amended following the process established in Article V of the Constitution. If a section of the Constitution is no longer in effect, it is most likely because it was formally repealed or altered through this process.
However, several provisions of the Constitution have become obsolete or are no longer relevant as a result of changes in society or technology. The Third Amendment, for example, which prevents soldiers from quartering in private residences during peacetime, is no longer relevant in modern times due to the existence of military camps and other facilities that may accommodate soldiers.
learn more about United States Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
why did laws concerning interracial marriage exist more in western states in the 1960s?
Answer:
Anti-miscegenation laws, which prohibited interracial marriage, were enacted by many states in the US. While it is widely known that many southern states had such laws, it is less widely known that many western states, such as California, also had laws prohibiting interracial marriage until as late as 1948. The reasons for the existence of these laws varied from state to state and were influenced by a variety of social, economic, and political factors. Some historians argue that these laws were a response to the socio-economic dynamics of the plantation system in the Southern colonies, while others suggest that they were a manifestation of white supremacist attitudes that sought to legislate racial purity. Fear of interracial marriage was also used as an argument to support racial segregation during the Jim Crow Era.
Early 19th century doctors argued that cholera typically attacked only individuals who...
Early 19th century doctors believed that cholera only attacked individuals who had an unhealthy lifestyle.
The medical community was largely influenced by the miasma theory, which suggested that illnesses such as cholera were caused by "bad air" or other environmental factors. Therefore, doctors believed that cholera was attracted to individuals who had a poor diet, drank alcohol, and exposed themselves to bad air.
They further argued that those who ate healthy, exercised, and avoided bad air would be immune to cholera. Doctors used this theory to explain why only some individuals in a given area would contract cholera while others would remain healthy. This theory was wrong, however, and by the late 19th century it had been replaced by the germ theory of disease. This theory explained that cholera was caused by bacteria and could therefore spread to anyone, regardless of lifestyle.
To know more about medical community , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/26945477
#SPJ4
HELP i dont have enough details
Answer:It isn’t. Apparently the founders of the UN didn’t learn from the mistakes of the League of Nations and compounded the mistakes with a “permanent 5” who can each veto any Security Council resolution at its sole discretion.
Many of the sub-organizations, such as the Human Rights Council have become a farce, with some of the worst human rights violators sitting as members, UNRWA and other agencies are rife with corruption and peacekeeping forces have no ability to keep the peace anywhere.
All in all, the founders never visualized a situation where 2/3 or more of the member states would be dictatorships of one kind or another.
Massive fail.
Explanation: hope this is helpful have a great day
love, shania
how would you have assisted in the fight for independence?
(ch9) Both Hinduism and Buddhism didn't...
Both Hinduism and Buddhism didn't originate from a single founder, rather they developed as a result of diverse cultural, philosophical, and religious beliefs over time. While they share some similarities, they also have distinct differences in their approaches to spirituality and the pursuit of enlightenment.
Hinduism and Buddhism didn't originate in the Western world, as they both originated in ancient India. Additionally, both religions share similar beliefs in karma, reincarnation, and the attainment of enlightenment or liberation from the cycle of rebirth. However, there are also significant differences between the two religions, such as the role of the caste system in Hinduism and the rejection of the concept in Buddhism. Additionally, Buddhism places a greater emphasis on personal experience and individual practice, while Hinduism has a more complex system of rituals and deities. However, as humans, we yearn for the protection of numerous gods, especially those with a particularly particular power. Numerous Hindu gods and goddesses can be found beyond the Trimurti, including the elephant-headed god Ganesha and the female fighter Durga. Every god has a unique power and function.
Learn more about karma here:
brainly.com/question/18175497
#SPJ11
Select all the correct answers.
The US Constitution contains which two of the following items or ideas?
Oa Bill of Rights
Articles I, II, and III to separate powers in the government
a limitation on the people's natural rights
allows states all the power to regulate taxes and trade
Reset
Next
How long has Gulliver been gone from home?
The correct answer is 5 years. According to the book "Gulliver's travels", Gulliver been gone from home about five years.
It is exact to express that Gulliver was gone from home for quite a long time in "Gulliver's travels" by Jonathan Quick. While the specific term of his process isn't determined, it is obvious from the story that Gulliver was away from home for a huge timeframe, logical quite a while. During this time, he visited different grounds, experienced different human advancements, and had various undertakings. The length and intricacy of his process propose that he was away from home for a drawn out period, yet the particular term is determined up to translation is around 5 years.
To learn more about Gulliver's travels, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/3134208
#SPJ4
Imperial England and English soldiers developed a contemptuous attitude toward natives partly through their earlier colonizing experiences in
The answer is d. Ireland. Due in part to their past colonisation efforts in Ireland, Imperial England and English soldiers came to have a disdain for native people.
As a result, central British control was established. Many Irish lords lost their lands and hereditary power, and Irish law, language, and culture were replaced. Irish landowners who ran their own businesses overnight became English tenants.
One of the main drivers behind the colonisation of the New World was the chance to generate money. In order to gain money for its investors, the Virginia Company of London founded the Jamestown colony. European exploration and colonisation were mostly motivated by necessity.
Read more about attitude toward at
https://brainly.com/question/9795383
#SPJ4
The full question is:
Imperial England and English soldiers developed a contemptuous attitude toward natives partly through their earlier colonizing experiences in
a. Canada.
b. Spain.
c. India.
d. Ireland.
e. the West Indies.
What was the major spark that triggered the New York draft riots in 1863?a. The beginning of mandatory conscription.b. The provision that allowed the rich to hire a substitute when drafted.c. The disproportionate number of upstate farmers in the military.d. White men's anger at fighting a war over slavery.e. The use of bounty brokers to staff the army.
The major spark that triggered the New York draft riots in 1863 was the provision that allowed the rich to hire a substitute when drafted.
This provision caused a great deal of resentment among lower and middle class men, who felt that the wealthy were being immune from the burden of the war. This was compounded by the fact that the use of bounty brokers to staff the army meant that poor men were being disproportionately targeted for conscription.
This resentment boiled over into violent protests, which resulted in several days of rioting and looting in New York City. The riots ultimately resulted in the deaths of at least 120 people and the destruction of millions of dollars in property.
To know more about New York, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12164635
#SPJ4
Each of the following contributed to the innovation boom of the 19th century
EXCEPT:
A. the publishing of Alexis de Tocqueville's "Democracy in America"
B. the 1836 change in the U.S. patent process
C. the expansion of America's economy during the 19th century
D. the growth in America's population and its spread across the continent
In summary A. the publishing of Alexis de Tocqueville's "Democracy in America"
Why is it?
The publication of Alexis de Tocqueville's "Democracy in America," the 1836 change in the U.S. patent process, the expansion of America's economy during the 19th century, and the growth in America's population and its spread across the continent all contributed to the innovation boom of the 19th century.
However, "Democracy in America" is not typically considered a direct contributor to the innovation boom, as it primarily focused on American political institutions and societal norms.
Instead, it was the economic and demographic changes occurring in America during this time that created a fertile ground for innovation and technological advancement.
To know more about Democracy related question visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ1
Deceased family members
Family members who have already died away are referred to as deceased family members, whether they were blood relatives or not.
Why are the words dead and deceased different?Usage Deceased and dead both mean "no longer living," but deceased is more polite and is commonly used when talking to someone who was close to the deceased or when speaking to someone who knew them. There is no longer my mother.
How do you define "late for dead"?The correct thing to do is to acknowledge their passing and the fact that their time on earth is over. We frequently use it as a sign of respect for the departed since it is considered formal and polite to acknowledge them.
How many distinct types of the dead exist?The classifications include homicide, sui-cide, pending, natural, and accident. The only people who are allowed to use all manners of death are coroners and medical examiners. Alternative certifiers must use the phrase "natural" or report the death to the coroner.
Learn more about Deceased family members: https://brainly.com/question/4537626
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Who are called Deceased family members?
meaning of restriction ancient rome
Restrictions played an important role in shaping the social and political structure of ancient Rome, and their enforcement was central to the maintenance of the Roman legal system and societal norms
What is the meaning of restriction ancient Rome?In ancient Rome, restrictions were laws or rules that limited or regulated certain behaviors or actions of individuals or groups within society.
These restrictions were established by the Roman Republic and later the Roman Empire to maintain social order, prevent corruption, and protect the rights of citizens.
Some examples of restrictions in ancient Rome include:
Restrictions on political participation: Only male citizens who met certain property and social status requirements were allowed to participate in the political process.Restrictions on religious practices: The state religion of ancient Rome was polytheistic, and certain religious practices were prohibited or limited in order to prevent the spread of foreign religions or cults.Restrictions on marriage and family: The Roman state imposed restrictions on marriage and family relationships, such as prohibiting marriage between close relatives or limiting the number of children that a family could have.Restrictions on trade and commerce: The Roman state regulated trade and commerce in order to maintain economic stability and prevent monopolies or unfair practices.Learn more about ancient Rome at https://brainly.com/question/29427174
#SPJ1
In 1884 France claimed what it called _______________ as one of it's overseas colonies
In 1884 France claimed what it called Tonkin as one of it's overseas colonies.
The overseas colonies, protectorates, and mandate regions that were governed by France starting in the 16th century were all included in the French colonial empire. The second French colonial empire, which peaked between the two globe Wars, was the second-biggest colonial power in the globe, trailing only the British Empire.
In the 17th century, France started to develop colonies in North America, the Caribbean, and India but lost the majority of them after losing the Seven Years' War. It was only following its loss in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871 that the majority of France's later colonial conquests were obtained. The French occupied Tonkin and Annam (both in Vietnam) in 1884 and 1885 from their stronghold in Cochinchina.
Know more about overseas colonies here
https://brainly.com/question/28347890
#SPJ4
What revolutionary discoveries were made in the sixteenth and seventeenth century?
Answer: The heliocentric theory, law of inertia, discovery of Jupiter's moons orbits and Gravity
Explanation:
Most new settlers of the 13 colonies did NOT want to become wealthy.
It is a false statement that most new settlers of the 13 colonies did NOT want to become wealthy.
Did most new settlers in the 13 colonies want to become wealthy?While it is true that some new settlers in the 13 colonies did not come with the sole purpose of becoming wealthy, such as indentured servants or religious groups seeking refuge, the majority of settlers were motivated by economic opportunities and the pursuit of wealth.
The lure of land ownership, trade, and entrepreneurial endeavors were key drivers for colonization in the New World. Many settlers saw the colonies as a chance to improve their economic status and create a better life for themselves and their families. This can be seen in the establishment of colonies like Jamestown, Virginia, which was primarily motivated by the search for gold and other valuable resources.
Read more about new settlers
brainly.com/question/30465994
#SPJ1
Describe the roman empire at its height by discussing its extent, challenges, administration, and cities?
At its height, the Roman Empire was vast, covering areas across Europe, Africa, and Asia. The empire faced numerous challenges, such as external invasions, internal power struggles, and economic issues. Roman administration was well-organized, featuring a complex system of governance and laws. Notable cities within the empire included Rome, Constantinople, and Alexandria, which served as centers of commerce, culture, and politics.
The Roman Empire was a powerful and vast state that existed from 27 BCE to 476 CE, encompassing much of Europe, Asia, and Africa. It was characterized by a highly centralized government, efficient infrastructure, advanced engineering and architecture, and a strong military. The Roman Empire was founded by Julius Caesar's adopted son, Octavian (later known as Caesar Augustus), who established a new form of government that replaced the Roman Republic. The empire underwent periods of expansion and contraction, and was marked by important cultural, economic, and political developments, such as the adoption of Christianity as the state religion and the development of the Latin language. The fall of the Roman Empire was a complex process that involved military, economic, and political factors, and marked the end of the ancient world.
Learn more about Roman Empire here:
https://brainly.com/question/11415671
#SPJ11
The basic military strategy of Eisenhower's and Dulles's New Look foreign policy in the 1950s aimed at
The basic military strategy of Eisenhower's and Dulles's New Look foreign policy in the 1950s aimed at reducing military spending and relying more on nuclear weapons as a deterrent to potential aggressors.
The New Look doctrine emphasised a shift away from the Truman administration's substantial land forces and a concentration on increasing the United States' nuclear weapons. The plan sought to prevent Soviet aggression by threatening overwhelming response in the case of an attack.
This strategy was considered as a method to retain US military might while lowering total defence costs. The United States could keep a smaller, more agile military force while yet portraying power and deterring potential adversaries by relying on nuclear weapons as a deterrent.
For such more question on military:
https://brainly.com/question/1050942
#SPJ11
What groups made up the Puritan movement?
Answer: Quakers, Antinomians, and Baptists
Explanation:
Analyzing Why does the production function represent short-run production?
Answer:
Explanation:
The production function represents short-run production because it is the relationship between the inputs used in production and the maximum output that can be produced using those inputs. In the short-run, production is limited due to the fixed inputs, such as capital and technology, which cannot be changed easily. As a result, the production output is limited by the amount of inputs available. In the long-run, production is more flexible because inputs can be changed and added.
Before working through each problem, identify the principal, rate, time. Work with your shoulder-partner to find the solution. • Mr. Jackson deposited $1,250 in a new account at his bank.
• The bank pays 3.5% simple interest
• Mr. Jackson pays no additional deposits or withdrawals.
o What amount is closest to the balance of the account at the end of 2 years?
Answer:
principal: 1250
rate: 3.5%
time: 2 years
formula: prt
=1250(3.5%)(2)
= 87.5
=1250+87.5
=1337.5
what happened durning the rule of the "five good emperors"
The "Five Good Emperors" were a series of Roman emperors who ruled during the 2nd century AD, from 96 to 180 AD. Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, and Marcus Aurelius were the five emperors.
The "Five Good Emperors" are so named because they are largely recognised as a time of relative stability, wealth, and good governance in the Roman Empire.
The Roman Empire enjoyed a period of expansion and consolidation, as well as substantial cultural and social progress, under the administration of the Five Good Emperors.
Overall, the Five Good Emperors' reign is seen as a high period in Roman history, marked by stability, wealth, and good government.
For such more question on Roman emperors:
https://brainly.com/question/25113596
#SPJ11
Which technology made it possible to build railroads during the 1800s?
A. steam power
B. oil
C. new factories
D. electricity
The technology that made it possible to build railroads during the 1800s was steam power. Therefore option A is correct.
Prior to the introduction of steam power, transportation was mainly done through horse-drawn carriages, which were slow and inefficient.
Steam power, however, allowed for the development of locomotives that could transport goods & people at much faster speeds. This innovation revolutionized transportation during the 19th century, paving the way for the construction of railroads that would span entire continents.
Steam power had already been in use in factories & other industries, but the adaptation of steam engines for use in locomotives allowed for the creation of powerful machines that could pull heavy loads over long distances.
To know more about railroads-
brainly.com/question/513966
#SPJ1
how did mcloughlin hope his scorched earth policy
McLoughlin hoped that his scorched earth policy would weaken the enemy by depriving them of essential resources. The policy involved the systematic destruction of crops, infrastructure, and other resources that could be used by the enemy, making it difficult for them to sustain their military operations.
What was McLoughlin's policy?By implementing this policy, McLoughlin aimed to:
1. Cut off the enemy's supply lines: Destroying resources would make it difficult for the enemy to resupply their troops, forcing them to rely on limited supplies and potentially leading to their defeat.
2. Hinder enemy movement: Damaging infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and railways would make it more challenging for the enemy to move their troops and equipment, slowing down their advance.
3. Demoralize the enemy: Witnessing the destruction of their resources and the hardship it would cause for their people might lower the morale of enemy soldiers and lead them to question their motivation for fighting.
4. Encourage the enemy to retreat: If the enemy realized that their efforts to conquer and exploit a region were futile due to the scorched earth policy, they might decide to withdraw and focus their efforts elsewhere.
Overall, McLoughlin's scorched earth policy was intended to make it as difficult as possible for the enemy to wage war, ultimately leading to their defeat or withdrawal.
To know more about McLoughlin visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17040880
#SPJ11
McLoughlin hoped that his scorched earth policy would weaken the enemy by depriving them of essential resources.
The policy involved the systematic destruction of crops, infrastructure, and other resources that could be used by the enemy, making it difficult for them to sustain their military operations.1. Cut off the enemy's supply lines: Destroying resources would make it difficult for the enemy to resupply their troops, forcing them to rely on limited supplies and potentially leading to their defeat.2. Hinder enemy movement: Damaging infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and railways would make it more challenging for the enemy to move their troops and equipment, slowing down their advance.
3. Demoralize the enemy: Witnessing the destruction of their resources and the hardship it would cause for their people might lower the morale of enemy soldiers and lead them to question their motivation for fighting.
4. Encourage the enemy to retreat: If the enemy realized that their efforts to conquer and exploit a region were futile due to the scorched earth policy, they might decide to withdraw and focus their efforts elsewhere.Overall, McLoughlin's scorched earth policy was intended to make it as difficult as possible for the enemy to wage war, ultimately leading to their defeat or withdrawal.
learn more about movement here:https://brainly.com/question/2856566
#SPJ11
EOC CROSSWORD
1 word- What is The Name of The English Legislature?
The name of the English legislature is the Parliament, which is made up of two houses: the House of Commons and the House of Lords. The Parliament is responsible for making laws, scrutinizing the actions of the government, and representing the people of the United Kingdom.
Sorry There isn't much to explain!
~~~Harsha~~~
For what purposes do the Lilliput ans learn "leaping and creeping"?
The Lilliputians learn "leaping and creeping" for practical purposes such as hunting and warfare, as well as for cultural and social events.
In "Gulliver's Travels," by Jonathan Swift, the Lilliputians discover "leaping and creeping" for a variety of uses. Practically speaking, these abilities let the Lilliputians better understand their surroundings, which is helpful for both hunting and combat.
Aside from that, "leaping and creeping" are often used in cultural and social occasions like dances and competitions. The Lilliputians' overall command of their physical prowess is a reflection of their ingenuity and flexibility in their little surroundings.
Learn more about Gulliver:
https://brainly.com/question/27880055
#SPJ4
How does Collins himself define the term hero?
The story "A Mystery of Heroism" by Stephen Crane does not explicitly mention how Fred Collins defines the term hero.
Collins is first hesitant to fetch water from the well due to the danger involved, implying that he is not ready to demonstrate his bravery as a soldier. Instead, he appears to be more concerned with survival and surviving the battle.
However, as he begins the mission and experiences the difficulties of evading bullets and escaping cannon fire, he begins to think on his own anxiety and doubts his courage.
When he decides to turn around and assist the Confederate soldiers, it is not out of a desire to impress anyone, but rather out of empathy and sympathy for their plight.
For such more question on Mystery:
https://brainly.com/question/28400307
#SPJ11
Despite their shared opposition to war, Moltke's and Giolitti's arguments in the two passages are different most likely because-
Moltke is primarily influenced by imperialism, whereas Giolitti is primarily influenced by nationalism
Moltke, a general, was not directly influenced by the political opinions of German voters, whereas Giolitti, an elected politician, was directly influenced by the opinions of Italian voters
Moltke is mainly concerned about the changing nature of warfare and the threat of a total war, whereas Giolitti is mainly concerned about the inherent instability of the European alliance system
Moltke is describing the possibility that Germany might be attacked by a rival state, whereas Giolitti is describing a planned Italian attack on a rival state
The correct answer is: Moltke is mainly concerned about the changing nature of warfare and the threat of a total war, whereas Giolitti is mainly concerned about the inherent instability of the European alliance system. Therefore the correct option is option C.
Moltke's argument focuses on the changing character of warfare and the possibility of total war, whereas Giolitti's argument focuses on the instability of the European alliance system and the hazards of being drawn into a conflict via a complicated structure of alliances.
The facts in the question does not support the other options supplied. Therefore the correct option is option C.
For such more question on Giolitti:
https://brainly.com/question/23075061
#SPJ11
How did the Dutch scholar Hugo Grotius (1583-1645) define natural rights?
Hugo Grotius (1583-1645), a Dutch scholar and philosopher, is known for his contribution to the development of natural law theory, which posits that certain rights are inherent to human beings and exist independently of any government or legal system.
Grotius defined natural rights in his treatise "The Law of War and Peace" (1625) as those that are "common to all human beings by the law of nature."
He contended that these rights are inherent in human nature and are drawn from reason and natural law, rather than being manufactured by governments or legal systems.
Natural rights, according to Grotius, encompass the right to life, liberty, property, and self-defense. He felt that these rights were universal and applied to all people, regardless of social background, ethnicity, or nationality.
For such more question on philosopher:
https://brainly.com/question/191967
#SPJ11