What is the value of -5^6?

Given collinear points A, B, and M, with M dividing AB internally in the ratio of 7:5, and a point P not on the line AB, it can be shown that PM is equal to the sum of PA and PB.

Let's consider the line segment AB, where M is a point that divides it internally in the ratio of 7:5. This means that the ratio of AM to MB is 7:5.

Now, let's consider the triangle PAB, where P is a point not on the line AB. We want to show that PM is equal to the sum of PA and PB.

Since M divides AB internally in the ratio of 7:5, we can express AM and MB in terms of their lengths. Let's assume the length of AM is 7x and the length of MB is 5x.

Using this information, we can express the lengths of PA and PB in terms of x as well. Let's denote the length of PA as y and the length of PB as z.

Since M divides AB internally in the ratio of 7:5, we can write:

AM/MB = 7x/5x = 7/5

Similarly, we can express the ratios of PM to PA and PM to PB:

PM/PA = 7x/y

PM/PB = 5x/z

We need to show that PM is equal to PA + PB:

PM = PA + PB

Substituting the ratios we derived earlier:

(7x/y) = (5x/z) + 1

To simplify the equation, we can multiply both sides by yz:

7xz = 5xy + yz

Next, we can factor out the common factor of y:

7xz = y(5x + z)

Now, we can divide both sides by (5x + z):

PM = y

Therefore, we have shown that PM is equal to PA + PB.

To know more about ratio, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/13419413#

#SPJ11

(a) The probability is approximately 0.6915. (Round to four decimal places as needed.)

(b) The probability is approximately 0.9999.

(a) The probability that a randomly selected woman's height is less than 63 inches is approximately 0.6915.

To find this probability, we can use the standard normal distribution and z-scores. The z-score is calculated using the formula z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the value we are interested in, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. In this case, x = 63 inches, μ = 62.5 inches, and σ = 2.1 inches.

Substituting these values into the formula, we get z = (63 - 62.5) / 2.1 = 0.2381. To find the probability corresponding to this z-score, we can look it up in the standard normal distribution table or use a statistical calculator. The probability associated with a z-score of 0.2381 is approximately 0.5915.

However, since we want to find the probability that the height is less than 63 inches, we need to find the area to the left of the z-score. Since the standard normal distribution is symmetrical, the area to the left of a positive z-score is equal to 1 minus the area to the right. Therefore, the probability that a randomly selected woman's height is less than 63 inches is approximately 1 - 0.5915 = 0.6915.

(b) The probability that a sample of 33 randomly selected women has a mean height less than 63 inches is approximately 0.9999.

When we have a sample of multiple individuals, the distribution of the sample mean approaches a normal distribution as the sample size increases, regardless of the shape of the population distribution. This phenomenon is known as the Central Limit Theorem.

For this problem, we can assume that the mean height of the sample of 33 women follows a normal distribution with the same mean as the population (62.5 inches) but with a standard deviation equal to the population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size. In this case, the sample standard deviation would be 2.1 inches divided by the square root of 33, which is approximately 0.3669 inches.

To find the probability that the sample mean height is less than 63 inches, we can again use z-scores. The z-score is calculated using the formula z = (x - μ) / (σ / √n), where x is the sample mean, μ is the population mean, σ is the population standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

Substituting the values into the formula, we get z = (63 - 62.5) / (0.3669) = 1.3662. The probability corresponding to this z-score can be found using a standard normal distribution table or a statistical calculator. The probability associated with a z-score of 1.3662 is approximately 0.9082.

However, since we want to find the probability that the sample mean height is less than 63 inches, we need to find the area to the left of the z-score. Thus, the probability that a sample of 33 randomly selected women has a mean height less than 63 inches is approximately 0.9999.

To know more about the Central Limit Theorem refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/898534#

#SPJ11

The inverse of the given function is represented by Data Table B.

A function is a law that relates a dependent and an independent variable.

The Inverse of the function is determined by interchanging the values of a and y in an f(x,y) function and then express the equation of y in terms of x.

Th table of the function is

Miles to go             Miles Travelled

0                                       0

100                                  310

200                                  450

340                                   550

650                                   650

The inverse of this data table will be

 Miles Travelled             Miles to go

650                                        650

340                                        550  

200                                       450

100                                        310

0                                             0

This is represented by Data Table B.

To know more about Function

https://brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ5

The probability that a randomly selected person will have a white blood cell count of between 2000 and 10,000 is 0.9223 approximately.

The given mean, standard deviation, and the range of values are as follows:

Mean = 7500

Standard deviation = 1750

Range of values = Between 2000 and 10000

We are required to calculate the probability of a random person having a white blood cell count between 2000 and 10000.

Let's find the Z values for 2000 and 10000.Z1 = (2000 - 7500) / 1750 = -3Z2 = (10000 - 7500) / 1750 = 1.43

The required probability is the sum of the probability of the given range of values.

The probability of the first value is:P(X < 2000) = P(Z < -3) = 0.00135

The probability of the second value is:P(X > 10000) = P(Z > 1.43) = 0.0764

To find the probability for the given range, we will subtract the probability of the second value from the probability of the first value.

P(2000 < X < 10000) = 1 - P(X < 2000) - P(X > 10000)P(2000 < X < 10000)

= 1 - 0.00135 - 0.0764P(2000 < X < 10000) = 0.9223

The probability that a randomly selected person will have a white blood cell count between 2000 and 10,000 is 0.9223, approximately.

#SPJ11

Let us know more about probability: https://brainly.com/question/30034780.

Answer:

try this link!

Step-by-step explanation:

https://www.wylieisd.net/cms/lib09/TX01918453/Centricity/Domain/783/Math%20Connections%20Key.pdf

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

- 72 = 8 ( y - 3 )

or - 72 / 8 = y - 3

or, - 9 = y - 3

y = - 9 + 3

Therefore X = - 6

Hope it will help :)❤

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

-72=8y-24

-72+24=8y

-48=8y

-48/8=y

-6=y

Answer:

x = 24

Step-by-step explanation:

x = .4(60)

x = 24

40% of 60 can be found by converting 40% to a decimal and multiplying it by 60.

40% = 0.4

60x0.4=2.4

Now move the decimal point right one.

So x is 24.

---

hope it helps

Answer:

(Disclaimer: all digits in the answers are in the measuring unit degrees)

1) 15

2) 16

3) 46

4) 59.

Step-by-step explanation:

The first one is said to add up to 89, so you have to do 89 subtract 44 and 30 as they are told. That = 15

The second one is a right angle, meaning it adds up to 90. You do 90 - 74 as that is the value told. That = 16

Angles on a straight line = 180 so you have to do 180 - 134 as that is the value told. This = 46

This is 54 as opposing angles on two lines are =. That means this = 59 too.

1. The value of x is:

180° - 40° - 30° = 110°

2. The value of x is:

90°- 38° = 52°

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

180 = 40 + x + 30

110 = x

90 = 38 + x

52 = x

Answer:

C.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer A and D are definitely incorrect.  Hope this helps Zoey. #Zoeyiscute:)

Answer:

27,29,38,39,42,52,53

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Your answers are correct

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) The parity check matrix H is:

1 1 1 0 1

0 1 0 1 1

0 1 1 0 0

To find the parity check matrix H, we can use the fact that H is the transpose of the generator matrix G with an identity matrix on the right side.

Given the generator matrix G:

1 0 0 1

1 1 1 0

1 0 1 1

0 1 0 0

1 1 0 1

We can rewrite G as:

1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0

1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0

1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1

0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1

Now, we can obtain the parity check matrix H by taking the transpose of G and removing the rightmost identity matrix:

H = Transpose(G without the rightmost identity matrix)

H =

1 1 1 0 1

0 1 0 1 1

0 1 1 0 0

Therefore, the matrix H is:

1 1 1 0 1

0 1 0 1 1

0 1 1 0 0

(b) The minimum distance of a linear block code is the smallest number of bit positions in which any two codewords differ. It determines the error detection and correction capability of the code.

To find the minimum distance of the code, we can examine the columns of the parity check matrix H. The number of non-zero entries in the smallest column gives us the minimum distance.

Looking at the parity check matrix H, we see that the smallest column has two non-zero entries in positions 1 and 2. Therefore, the minimum distance of the code is 2.

In conclusion, the minimum distance of the code is 2.

To know more about parity check matrix refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32063840

#SPJ11

Answer:

14 mm

Step-by-step explanation:

Just write down the answer.

Answer:

28mm

Step-by-step explanation:

is the right answer

Answer:

sin(4x) = sin(2x) is unsolvable.

Step-by-step explanation:

The two sides are not equal.

Correction in the Question:

A wooded area is in the shape of a a trapezoid whose bases measure 128 m and 92 m and its height is 40 m. A 4 m wide walkway is constructed which runs perpendicular from the two bases. Calculate the area of the wooded area after the addition of the walkway.

Answer:

The wooded area after the addition of the walkway is 4240 [tex]m^2[/tex].

Step-by-step explanation:

we are given

length of the two bases = 128m and 92m

height of the trapezoid = 40m

the approximate figure of the given trapezoid is given as:

             __ __ __ 92 __ __ _

          /  |               |  |                 \

       /     | 40         |4|                    \

    /__ _| __ __     |  |__ __ __ __ \

                           128

Area of a trapezoid = [(a + b)/2] * height, where a and b are representing the bases of the given trapezoid.

Area = [(92 + 128)/2] * 40

        = [220/2] * 40  

        = 110 * 40

        = 4400 [tex]m^2[/tex]

Now there is a 4m wide walkway is to be constructed in that trapezoid. The pathway will be a rectangle as it has 4m width and 40m height as it is perpendicular to both the bases.  

Area of a rectangle = length * width

Area = 40 * 4

        = 160

Since the walkway will reduce the area of the trapezoid as it is constructed upon it therefore the wooded area after the addition of the walkway is

4400 + (-160) = 4240 [tex]m^2[/tex].

Answer:

it 10000

Step-by-step explanation:

79ib dlndokveik dinfl. kwbfb

Answer:

4:1 ratio

Sugar: 1 cup

Butter: 3/4 cups

Eggs: 2

Baking powder: 3/8 tsp

Flour: 5/8 tsp (you need way more flour for cookies)

Salt: 1/8 tsp (original # was hard to make out but I think it was 1/2 tsp)

When a triangle is dilated by a scale factor, the area of the dilated triangle is equal to the scale factor squared times the area of the original triangle. The area of the dilated triangle is 828 cm².

In this case, the original triangle has an area of 23 cm². The triangle is dilated by a factor of 6, so the scale factor is 6.

To find the area of the dilated triangle, we use the formula:

Area of Dilated Triangle = (Scale Factor)^2 * Area of Original Triangle

Plugging in the values:

Area of Dilated Triangle = 6^2 * 23 cm²

                       = 36 * 23 cm²

                       = 828 cm²

Therefore, the area of the dilated triangle is 828 cm².

To know more about dilated triangle, click here: brainly.com/question/4248623

#SPJ11

Answer:  27

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]a_{1}=6\\a_{2}=a_{n-1}+7=a_{2-1} +7=a_{1} +7=6+7=13\\a_{3}=a_{n-1}+7=a_{3-1} +7=a_{2} +7=13+7=20\\a_{4}=a_{n-1}+7=a_{4-1} +7=a_{3} +7=20+7=27[/tex]

Interest earned in the first year was $75. If the total interest for the next 10 years is $750, then the investment must be receiving simple interest. False.

If the total interest for the next 10 years is $750, it indicates that the investment is receiving compound interest, not simple interest. In compound interest, the interest earned in each period is added to the principal, resulting in an increasing base for calculating subsequent interest. Simple interest, on the other hand, is calculated solely based on the initial principal amount and does not incorporate any interest earned over time.

Learn more about compund interest:

https://brainly.com/question/3989769

#SPJ11

Given a swimming pool that is 2.50 m deep, we need to determine how far below ground level the bottom of the pool appears to be located.

The apparent depth of an object submerged in a medium, such as water, can be calculated using the concept of refraction. Refraction occurs when light travels from one medium to another, and its speed changes. According to Snell's law, the apparent depth (d') of an object in a medium is related to its actual depth (d) and the refractive index (n) of the medium.

The formula for calculating the apparent depth is:

d' = d / n.

In this case, the actual depth of the pool is 2.50 m, and the pool is filled with water, which has a refractive index of approximately 1.33.

Substituting the values into the formula, we have:

d' = 2.50 m / 1.33 ≈ 1.88 m.

Therefore, the bottom of the pool appears to be located approximately 1.88 meters below ground level. This means that when observing the pool from above, it would appear as if the bottom of the pool is situated 1.88 meters below the surface of the ground.

Learn more about approximately here:

https://brainly.com/question/31695967

#SPJ11

Answer:

Here's a calculator that should help

Step-by-step explanation:

https://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/algebra/completing-the-square-calculator.php

Answer:

hi

Step-by-step explanation:

i think,

13:14=54

13k+14k=54

27k=54

k=54/27

k=2

13×2=26 and 14×2=28

to verify the correctness of the answer-26+28=56

have a nice day

hope it helps

The ratio of the divide is mathematically given as

26:28

Question Parameters:

divide 54 books between A and B in the ratio 13:14​

Generally,  ratios are mathematically given as

X=13/27*54

X=26

Y=14/27*54

Y=28

In conclusion, the ratio of the divide would be

26:28

Read more about Arithmetic

https://brainly.com/question/22568180

Answer: 0,2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

here, i can help you out!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

For 1. 2/5 is less full then 1/2

Answer:

1. The set of whole numbers contains the set of rational numbers.  FALSE.

The set of integers contains the set of rational numbers

2. Every terminating decimal is a rational number.       TRUE

3. Every square root is a rational number.       FALSE

Many square roots are irrational numbers, meaning there is no rational number equivalent.

4. The integers are closed under addition.      TRUE

The exact values of c in increasing order are: c = (10 - sqrt(7)) / 3, (10 + sqrt(7)) / 3

To verify that Rolle's Theorem can be applied to the function f(x) = x³ - 10x² + 31x - 30 on the interval [2, 5], we need to check if the following conditions are satisfied:

Let's check each condition:

f(x) = x³ - 10x² + 31x - 30 is a polynomial function and is continuous for all real values of x. So, it is continuous on [2, 5].

To check the differentiability, we need to find f'(x):

f'(x) = 3x² - 20x + 31.

The derivative f'(x) exists and is continuous for all real values of x. So, f(x) is differentiable on (2, 5).

Now, let's evaluate f(2) and f(5):

f(2) = (2)³ - 10(2)² + 31(2) - 30 = -10

f(5) = (5)³ - 10(5)² + 31(5) - 30 = 95

Since f(2) = -10 is not equal to f(5) = 95, we can conclude that Rolle's Theorem can be applied to the function f(x) = x³ - 10x² + 31x - 30 on the interval [2, 5] after differentiable.

To find the values of c in the interval (2, 5) such that f'(c) = 0, we need to solve the equation f'(c) = 3c² - 20c + 31 = 0.

Using quadratic formula:

c = (-(-20) ± sqrt((-20)² - 4(3)(31))) / (2(3))

c = (20 ± sqrt(400 - 372)) / 6

c = (20 ± sqrt(28)) / 6

c = (20 ± 2sqrt(7)) / 6

c = (10 ± sqrt(7)) / 3

The values of c in the interval (2, 5) such that f'(c) = 0 are:

c = (10 + sqrt(7)) / 3

c = (10 - sqrt(7)) / 3

Therefore, the exact values of c in increasing order are: c = (10 - sqrt(7)) / 3, (10 + sqrt(7)) / 3.

To know more about differentiable check the below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31143557

#SPJ4

Incomplete question:

Verify that Rolle's Theorem can be applied to the function f(x) = x³ - 10x² +31x-30 on the interval [2, 5]. Then find all values of c in the interval such that f' (c) = 0.

Enter the exact answers in increasing order.

To enter √a, type sqrt(a)

c = ?

Eigenvalues and eigenvectors play a crucial role in the study of linear transformations and matrices. For a normal matrix A, it can be proven that eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues are necessarily orthogonal.

To understand why eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues are orthogonal for a normal matrix, we need to consider the properties of normal matrices. A matrix A is normal if it commutes with its conjugate transpose A* (i.e., A * A* = A* A).

Now, let's consider two eigenvectors v₁ and v₂ corresponding to different eigenvalues λ₁ and λ₂, respectively. We want to show that v₁ and v₂ are orthogonal, meaning their dot product is zero (v₁ · v₂ = 0).

Let's denote the conjugate transpose of A as A*, and the eigenvalues and eigenvectors as follows:

A * A = A * A*   (1)

Multiplying both sides of equation (1) by v₂* (the conjugate transpose of v₂) from the left gives:

v₂* A * A = v₂* A * A*   (2)

Since v₂ is an eigenvector of A, we can express it as:

A * v₂ = λ₂ v₂    (3)

Substituting equation (3) into equation (2) gives:

v₂* λ₂ A = v₂* A * A*    (4)

Now, let's multiply equation (4) by v₁ from the right:

v₂* λ₂ A v₁ = v₂* A * A* v₁    (5)

Since v₁ is an eigenvector of A, we can express it as:

A * v₁ = λ₁ v₁    (6)

Substituting equation (6) into equation (5) gives:

v₂* λ₂ λ₁ v₁ = v₂* λ₁ A* v₁    (7)

Notice that λ₁ and λ₂ are scalars, so we can move them around. Taking the conjugate transpose of equation (7), we get:

(λ₂ λ₁) v₁* v₂ = (λ₁ v₁)* A v₂    (8)

Now, we have v₁* v₂ on the left-hand side and (λ₁ v₁)* A v₂ on the right-hand side. If v₁ and v₂ are not orthogonal (v₁ · v₂ ≠ 0), then v₁* v₂ ≠ 0. However, the right-hand side of equation (8) is proportional to (λ₁ v₁)* A v₂, which is proportional to A v₂. This implies that A v₂ is a scalar multiple of v₁, which contradicts the assumption that v₁ and v₂ correspond to different eigenvalues.

Therefore, we conclude that eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues for a normal matrix are necessarily orthogonal.

To know more about normal matrices, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29102682#

#SPJ11