What is the perimeter of the triangle

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

221/13=17

So $17 for one hour

153/17=9

I dunno if this is right :)

Answer:

Carmen has to work 9 hours to make $153.

Step-by-step explanation:

Well first we would need to find out how much she makes an hour, so to do that we would divide the 221 by 13 hours and get 17. Then you just keep multiplying until you have the right number.

17x4=68

17x5=85

17x6=102

17x7=119

17x8=136

17x9=153

Answer:

$29

Step-by-step explanation:

30(1/5) = 6

30 - 6 = 24

30(1/10) = 3

24 - 3 = 21

50 - 21 = 29

(Nvm i realized i was wrong)

Answer:

3.5 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

create a proportion:

inches / miles = inches / miles

let 'x' = distance in inches

1/4 = x

18    252

18x = 252(1/4)

18x = 63

x = 63 / 18

x = 3.5

Answer:

145

Step-by-step explanation:

x+35=180(linear pair)

x=145

or

180+35+x=360(being complete turn)

x=145

Answer:

I got 77

Step-by-step explanation:

38.5÷0.5=x

385÷5=x

x=77

Answer:

77

Step-by-step explanation:

38x2 = 76

I did this because 0.5 is one half and you multiply it by 2 to get a whole number.

and you add 1 because there is 1 0.5 in 0.5

So the answer is 76+ 1 or 77

Answer:

ELM Ridge is growing at a faster rate

Step-by-step explanation:

To obtain the solution, we calculate the growth rate of both cities

Given :

Nadia : Preston

Population Last Year 5,589

This Year 5,702

Growth rate:

[(this year population - Last year population) / last year population] * 100%

[(5702 - 5589) / 5589] * 100%

(113 / 5589) * 100%

= 0.0202182 * 100%

= 2.02%

ELM Ridge

Last Year 1,870

This Year 1,926

Growth rate:

[(this year population - Last year population) / last year population] * 100%

[(1926 - 1870) / 1870] * 100%

(56 / 1870) * 100%

= 0.0299465 * 100%

= 2.994%

= 3%

Answer:

attached below

Step-by-step explanation:

Applying the rule of logical equivalences

attached below  is a detailed solution ( written as a numbered sequence of statements )

Answer:

identity laws, domination laws, commutative laws, double negation laws these are some laws from logical equivalence.

What is logical equivalence?

A tautology is a claim that is true no matter what the truth values of the propositional variables it includes are.Contradictions and absurdities refer to a group of propositions that are all untrue.It's also known as a contingency when a composite proposition contains neither a tautology nor a contradiction.What does this imply in actuality, though?To make sense of this, go to the following truth table.

Contradiction and tautology

Inconsistency, contradiction, and tautology So a tautology is when every single statement in a column is true, as defined by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and is often indicated by a bold-faced capital T. When the entire column is untrue, a contradiction, which is often denoted by a boldface capital F, exists.

However, why is this significant?

We may better understand propositional equivalences, or assertions that are equivalent in logical reasoning, by using tautologies and contradictions, which are necessary in establishing or verifying mathematical arguments. Our task will be to confirm the logical equivalentity of propositions like p and q.

To know more:

https://brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ2

The solution is, x = 0 , y = 4, solutions that this linear system of equation  have.

Simplify simply means to make it simple. In mathematics, simply or simplification is reducing the expression/fraction/problem in a simpler form. It makes the problem easy with calculations and solving.

here, we have,

given that,

Solve the following system:

{y = 4 - 3 x | (equation 1)

x + 2 y = 8 | (equation 2)

Express the system in standard form:

{3 x + y = 4 | (equation 1)

x + 2 y = 8 | (equation 2)

Subtract 1/3 × (equation 1) from equation 2:

{3 x + y = 4 | (equation 1)

0 x+(5 y)/3 = 20/3 | (equation 2)

Multiply equation 2 by 3/5:

{3 x + y = 4 | (equation 1)

0 x+y = 4 | (equation 2)

Subtract equation 2 from equation 1:

{3 x+0 y = 0 | (equation 1)

0 x+y = 4 | (equation 2)

Divide equation 1 by 3:

{x+0 y = 0 | (equation 1)

0 x+y = 4 | (equation 2)

Collect results:

Answer: {x = 0 , y = 4

Hence, The solution is, x = 0 , y = 4, solutions that this linear system of equation  have.

To learn more on simplification click:

brainly.com/question/28996879

#SPJ7

Complete question:

How many solutions does this linear system have?

y=-3x+4

x + 2y = 8

O

O

O

O

one solution: (8,0)

one solution: (0,8)

no solution

infinite number of solutions

Answer:

commutative

Step-by-step explanation:

Commutative property says changing the order of addends does not change the sum.

Answer:

commutative

Step-by-step explanation:

Commutative property says changing the order of addends does not change the sum.

Answer:

x=12

y = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

3x + y = 4x - 2y

x = 3y

y= 1/3x

3x + y = 40             3x + y = 40

3(3y) + y = 40         3x + (1/3x) = 40

9y + y =40              10/3x = 40

10y = 40                  x = 12

y= 4

Answer:

We know that all sides of the equilateral triangle is equal.

Given :---

An equilateral triangle has a side length of 40.

Another side of the same triangle measures

3x + y.

The third side of the same triangle measures

4x - 2y.

According to the above problem, the equation are

3x+y=40........(i) and 4x-2y=40.........(ii)

Divide the equation (ii) by 2, we get

2x-y=20..........(iii)

Now solving for x and y we get,

3x+y=40.......(i)

2x-y=20........(iii)

5x =60

x=60/5

x=12

Putting the value of x in equation in equation (iii) we get

24-y=20

y=24-20

y=4

The values of x and y that would keep the triangle equilateral are 12 and 4 respectively.

Answer:

4.48

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 13 quarters and 10 dimes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3600

Step-by-step explanation:

If she has 800 her teacher gives her 3000= 3800 and she gave 100 to both of her friends - 200 then she will have 3600.

Hope this helps! Please consider marking brainliest! I hope you have an amazing day. Always remember, your smart and you got this! -Alycia

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  84 = j × 7

Step-by-step explanation:

A product results from multiplying two numbers. Here, the two numbers are said to be "Julie's score" and 7. "Julie's score" is represented by j, so the product is ...

  j × 7

Then the translation can be ...

  84 is the product of j and 7

  84 = j × 7

__

In algebra, we can indicate a product without the multiplication symbol, simply by writing the factors next to each other. Generally, we write the numeric factor first:

  84 = 7j . . . . another way to write the answer

Note that this latter method does not seem to appear in the forms available for your answer box.

Answer:

Hi ma'am/sir... make sure your question is complete with a photo or options when asking a question on brainly.com

Step-by-step explanation:

thanks!

Answer:

[tex]Total\ Rotation = 225^{\circ}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

See attachment for nut

Required

Determine the angle of rotation

The total angle in the nut is:

[tex]\theta = 360^{\circ}[/tex]

An octagonal nut has 8 sides. So, each rotation is:

[tex]Each\ Rotation=\frac{360^{\circ}}{8}[/tex]

[tex]Each\ Rotation=45^{\circ}[/tex]

From position 8 to 5, there are 5 movements.

So, the total rotation is:

[tex]Total\ Rotation = Each\ Rotation * Moves[/tex]

[tex]Total\ Rotation = 45^{\circ} * 5[/tex]

[tex]Total\ Rotation = 225^{\circ}[/tex]

Answer:

B is the correct answer

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps :)

Answer:

s e([tex]p^{-} _{1} - p^{-} _{2}[/tex] ) =  0.07576

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

The  proportion of the first sample

      [tex]p^{-} _{1} = \frac{x_{1} }{n_{1} } = \frac{23}{53} = 0.43396[/tex]

The proportion of the second sample

      [tex]p^{-} _{2} = \frac{x_{2} }{n_{2} } = \frac{48}{178} = 0.2696[/tex]

Step(ii):-

Standard Error of ([tex]p^{-} _{1} - p^{-} _{2}[/tex]) is determined by

[tex]se(p^{-} _{1} - p^{-} _{2}) = \sqrt{\frac{p^{-} _{1} (1-p^{-} _{1} )}{n_{1} }+\frac{p^{-} _{2}(1-p^{-} _{2} ) }{n_{2} } }[/tex]

[tex]se(p^{-} _{1} - p^{-} _{2}) = \sqrt{\frac{0.43396) (1-0.43396 )}{53 }+\frac{0.2696(1-0.2696 ) }{178} }[/tex]

on simplification, we get

s e([tex]p^{-} _{1} - p^{-} _{2}[/tex] ) =  0.07576

Answer:

18.

Explanation:

Please let me know if you want me to add an explanation as to why this is the answer/how I got this answer. I can definitely do that, I just wouldn’t want to write it if you don’t want me to :)

The value of 'x' in two similar triangles is 6.46.

A triangle is a three-sided closed-plane figure formed by joining three noncolinear points. Based on the side property triangles are of three types they are Equilateral triangle, Scalene triangle, and Isosceles triangle.

We know in similar triangles the ratio of their corresponding sides are equal.

Therefore, The equation to determine the value of 'x' should be,

(2x - 6)/20 = 36/(x + 6).

36(2x - 6) = 20(x + 6).

72x - 216 = 20x + 120.

72x - 20x = 120 + 216.

52x = 336.

x = 336/52.

x = 6.46.

learn more about triangles here :

https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ2

Answer:

hhehehehe

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

who is jessica and y r u even using brainly to say this?..

Step-by-step explanation:

....

Answer:

A) At the level of significance of 0.05, the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is not convincing evidence to suggest the true proportion of television viewers who watch the show is less than 0.20.

Since the calculated p value by the test is obtained higher than that of significance level, thus we cannot reject the null hypothesis.

Thus, option A: At the level of significance of 0.05, the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is not  convincing evidence to suggest the true proportion of television viewers who watch the show is less than 0.20.

We have following information:

The p value obtained by test = 0.47

The test was conducted to test the claim that the proportion of viewers who watch a particular show is less than 0.20 at a level of significance 0.05.

We have the null hypothesis as

Null hypothesis here = "the proportion of viewers who watch a particular show is equal to 0.20 "

Alternate hypothesis = "the proportion for aforesaid condition is less than 0.20"

Since the obtained p value is more than the level of significance, thus we have the conclusion that we cannot reject the null hypothesis, thus cannot conclude that the proportion for aforesaid condition is less than 0.20.

Thus, option A: At the level of significance of 0.05, the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is not convincing evidence to suggest the true proportion of television viewers who watch the show is less than 0.20.

Learn more about testing of hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/4454077

Answer:

[tex]3 \div \frac{1}{8} = 3 \times \frac{8}{1} = 3 \times 8 = 24[/tex]

Answer:

Hey shelby Sorry i havent talk to you anyway maybe want to catch up and talk someday

Step-by-step explanation:

And ill answer the question when i can focus more sorry if i stole ur points ummmm ill put the answer as a comment to my answer or what ever

This shows a list of points where the x coordinate does not repeat. This means that any given x input leads to exactly one y output.

Something like choice A has x = 6 repeated; showing that x = 6 leads to both y = 11 and y = -9 at the same time. So this is why choice A is not a function. Choice B has x = 1 repeat, so it's not a function either. Choice C has x = 19 repeated, so it's not a function.

As a visual tool, you can use the vertical line test to check each set of points. If you are able to draw a single vertical line through more than one point on the graph, then it is not a function.

Answer: A

Step-by-step explanation: I hope I help you if it was wrong I'm sorry

Answer:

A. Cendric is correct because he used the inverse of subtraction and added 4.5

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve for x, all we needed to do was to make x stand alone. To do this, we have to apply addition property of equality. This means we would add 4.5 to both sides for the equation to balance. Thus, we would have z standing alone which equals 3.

Therefore, Cendric was correct because he used the inverse of subtraction of -4.5, which is 4.5 that was later added to both sides of the equation.

Answer:  b

Step-by-step explanation:

took the quiz same answer on edunity

Desmos Graphing Calculator