To prevent having multiple candidates from the same party confusing voters in a general election, political parties conduct nomination races.
What are Nomination Races?
To become the presidential nominee, a candidate necessarily has to win a majority of delegates. This actually happens through the party's state primaries and caucuses. State delegates go to the national convention to vote to confirm their choice of candidates.
Candidates for Presidential Nominee are Elected by Majority Vote. The Presidential Preference Primary is held every four years in the spring of the presidential election year to select the nominee for the party by majority vote.
To know more about Nomination Races:
https://brainly.com/question/29307639
#SPJ4
since the commercial speech doctrine was established in the central hudson case, it has remained unchanged.
The given statement is False, which states that, since the primary Hudson case, where the commercial speech doctrine was founded, it has not changed.
The Central Hudson test is used by the Supreme Court to decide whether a restriction on commercial speech is allowed under the First Amendment. It originates from Central Hudson Gas & Elec. Co. v. Public Serv. Comm. of New York, the ruling that bears the same name.
Previously, there was no free speech protection for commercial communication. "We are equally clear that the Constitution imposes no such constraint on government as it concerns simply commercial advertising," the Supreme Court stated in Valentine V Chrestensen (1942).
The Central Hudson test continues to be the standard in the law governing commercial communication. However, a few of justices have objected to it. In recent judgments like 44 Liquormart and most recently Sorrell V IMS Health, the Court has strengthened free speech protections for commercial communication. The Central Hudson test has endured, and it is still a sound legal principle.
To learn more about Hudson case please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/13171425
#SPJ4
a taxpayer who receives boot in a nontaxable exchange must recognize gain equal to the lesser of the fmv of the boot or the gain realized. True or Flase
The statement that a taxpayer who receives boot in a nontaxable exchange must recognize gain equal to the lesser of the FMV of the boot or the gain realized is true.
Boot refers to anything that is not considered “like-kind” that the taxpayer receives in an exchange and may include cash, property other than real property, or net debt relief. Any boot the taxpayer receives is regarded as taxable gain and will trigger a taxable event. A nontaxable exchange refers to an exchange in which any gain is not taxed, and any loss cannot be deducted. A taxpayer who receives boot in a nontaxable exchange must recognize gain equal to the lesser of the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the boot realized.
Learn more about Nontaxable exchange:
https://brainly.com/question/13763137
#SPJ4
water power corporation wants to begin operations that include the discharge of waste into navigable waters. under the clean water act, the company must install certain equipment
The water power firm must install specific equipment before starting operations in accordance with the clean water legislation.
A global regulation known as the "clean water act" was established to prevent people from wasting water and from harming the environment.
According to the clean water act, equipment must be erected before operations can begin if there is a risk that a project could release water in a way that will pollute navigable water.
Equipment must be constructed first in order to ensure that the essential tools are available to halt the overflow of water during the procedure.
Even if the question is incomplete, you might be referring to this:
A company called Water Power Corporation wants to start up operations that include dumping garbage into navigable waters. According to the clean water act, the business must set up specific hardware: .
a. as soon as operations are underway, with all deliberate haste.
b. just before procedures start.
c. solely at your own discretion.
d. only in the event that a regulatory body contests the discharge.
To learn more about clean water act please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/14284975
#SPJ4
Carlos, who is 22 years old, is employed as a security officer at JJ Security Corp., which is a private firm. The manager of JJ Security intends to retain employees who are older as he feels that they are likely to perform better. He fires Carlos and replaces him with Samuel, who is 54 years old. Which of the following statements is most likely to be true in this case? A) Carlos will win an age discrimination suit under the ADEA against JJSecurity as it is illegal to fire an employee on the basis of age. B) Carlos cannot file an age discrimination suit against JJ Security as reverse discrimination is not covered under the ADEA. C) Carlos will win an age discrimination suit under the ADEA against JJ Security as he is a member of the protected class. D) Carlos cannot file an age discrimination suit against JJ Security under the ADEA as it is applicable only to federal employees
Answer: B Feedback: In this case, Carlos cannot file an age discrimination suit against JJ Security Corp. as reverse discrimination is not covered under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act only protects employees over 40 from discrimination. Unlike Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, there is no protection from reverse discrimination.
Among all the given statements, the one that is most likely to be true in the given case is: “Carlos cannot file an age discrimination suit against JJ Security as reverse discrimination is not covered under the ADEA.” Hence, Option B is correct.
Carlos is unable to launch a lawsuit for age discrimination against JJ Security Corp. in this instance because the Age Discrimination in Employment Act does not cover reverse discrimination.
Employees over 40 are the only ones protected from discrimination by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Reverse discrimination is not covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Carlos, a security officer who is 22 years old, works for a private company called JJ Security Corp. The manager of JJ Security plans to keep older workers because he believes they would perform better. Carlos is fired, and Samuel, a 54-year-old man, is brought in to replace him.
Therefore, Option B is correct.
Learn more about Carlos from here:
https://brainly.com/question/18891707
#SPJ4
According to the Preamble, the Constitution was intended to (select all that apply).
provide for the common defense
establish justice
limit the power of government
promote general welfare
The Preamble states that the Constitution's goals were to establish justice, fund the common defense, and advance the public welfare.
What is the main purpose of the constitution?
It outlines the constitutionally guaranteed rights of citizens that organizations, regulations, and laws must preserve. In terms of politics, it establishes, distributes, and places restrictions on governmental power as well as providing forums for discussing and deciding on public policy.
The Constitution – is it a law?
The fundamental law of the United States is the Constitution. It formalizes the people's fundamental principles. The interpretation of any laws approved by Congress, as well as the meaning of the Constitution, must be determined by the courts.
To know more about constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ4
in the united states, laws are handed down by the executive branch in the form of common law.
The executive branch promulgates regulatory authority statutes in the form of common law.
What is the role of executive?Executives are typically in charge of developing the policies and plans that achieve organizational objectives. Managers direct, plan, and coordinate operational activities for an organization and corporation. They frequently travel to conferences and meetings as well as regional, local, national, and foreign branches and offices.
What is an example of executive?Another word that describes having the ability to make decisions is executive. Implementing legislation that will improve the quality of life for its residents is the responsibility of the president of the United States, which heads the executive branch of the government.
To know more about executive visit:
brainly.com/question/25988111
#SPJ4
he has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
This is in relation to the requirement that each colony's top executive or colonial governor is required to suspend certain laws until the King provides his consent.
The governor's duties are what?As a result, governors are responsible for enforcing state laws and setting policy for the state executive branch. As state leaders, governors can pursue new and modified policies and programs through a variety of tools, such as executive orders, executive budgets, legislative bills, and vetoes.
Do all states have governors?Every state will have a governor (Articles 153 of the Constitution of India). According to the Indian Constitution, the Governor shall hold the executive power of the State and may use it himself or through persons who report to him (Article 154).
To know more about governors visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11254312
#SPJ4
According to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (PL 108-446), students with physical impairments may qualify for special education services under three possible categories:
Orthopedic impairments, multiple disabilities, and traumatic brain injury
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (PL 108-446), students with physical impairments may qualify for special education services under three possible categories are : Orthopedic impairments, multiple disabilities, and traumatic brain injury.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), all eligible children with disabilities between the ages of 3 and 21 (or until the kid graduates) are entitled to a free suitable public education that is tailored to their specific needs.
The goal of the law is to guarantee that individuals with disabilities have the same opportunities and rights as everyone else. The ADA provides people with disabilities with civil rights protections akin to those that are given to people based on their race, color, sex, national origin, age, and religion.
For more info about 'Disabilities Education Improvement Act' click on below link - https://brainly.com/question/10552109
#SPJ4
which of the following means that a court may set aside decisions made by elected representatives of the people if judges conclude that a law violates the constitution?
If there were threats or violent acts intended to influence the vote, the NLRB may declare the results invalid and order a new election in which of the following situations.
If the union or employer's activities created uncertainty or a sense of reprisal, interfering with the employees' ability to choose, the election results will be thrown out. offering benefits to employees in an effort to decrease union support. employees who take part in union or legally protected collective activity may not be penalized in any other way, such as by being transferred, fired, or given more difficult tasks.
The agency may also pursue make-whole remedies like reinstatement and back pay for fired employees in addition to educational ones like the company posting a notice promising not to break the law.
To learn more about NLRB please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/14869133
#SPJ4
When judges rely on prior court rulings to help decide an issue, they are using the doctrine of:
FILL IN THE BLANK. ________ was the former Texas Speaker of the House who was indicted for taking an illegal gift from a law firm that specialized in collecting delinquent taxes for local governments.
Gib Lewis was the former Texas Speaker of the House who was indicted for taking an illegal gift from a law firm that specialized in collecting delinquent taxes for local governments.
In 1991, Speaker Gibson D. 'Gib" Lewis (1937-) turned into the primary individual in Texas history to be elected presiding official of the Place of Agents for five terms. Lewis, a 11-term lawmaker from Tarrant District, brought to the speakership a way of thinking underlining the panel cycle, which he considered the core of lawmaking.
Lewis was brought into the world in Oletha, Texas, and spent his initial a long time in Mexia. He was graduated from Cleveland Secondary School in 1955 and attended Sam Houston State Educators School prior to proceeding with his studies at Texas Christian College during the period he was assigned to Carswell Flying corps Base in Stronghold Worth. Following four years in the Air Power, Lewis accepted a position in 1961 as a sales rep for a paper organization and, after three years, opened his own firm having some expertise in pressure-touchy marks and decals. Lewis go on as president of Lewis Mark Products, Inc., today, three decades after its founding.
Lewis first became involved in civic participation in 1969 when he was elected to the Stream Oaks City Committee. Following a fruitful mission for a seat in the Texas Place of Agents, he arrived in Austin in 1971 as an individual from the Post Worth delegation.
to know more about civic participation click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1896977
#SPJ4
The Supreme Court first ruled that the First Amendment provided some protectionfrom government regulation of commercial speech in a case involvingA. a letter to the editor in which Nike defended its overseas facilities.B. interstate advertising for casinos.C. a tobacco ad using cartoon characters.D. an advertisement for the civil rights movement.
The correct answer is D). an advertisement for the civil rights movement. In a case regarding the government's restriction of commercial speech, the Supreme Court initially determined that the First Amendment afforded some protection.
First, the commercial communication must not be deceptive and must relate legitimate activities in order to qualify as protected speech under the First Amendment.
Blackmun came to the conclusion that the First Amendment protects commercial speech, even communications like advertisements that only hint at a business transaction.
An online advertisement, such as those found in video games, is an illustration of commercial speech. Flyer distribution to raise awareness of a product is another example of a commercial speech. Another excellent example of advertising communication is on television.
Read more about Supreme Court at
https://brainly.com/question/1107784
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. under the principle of rights theory, one person’s principles are as "right" as another’s.
Under the principle of rights theory, one person’s principles are as "right" as another’s is false. Correct answer is false.
What do you mean by Theory?A well considered explanation for observations of the natural world that has been developed through the scientific method and that combines numerous facts and hypotheses is known as a theory.
One person's principles are just as "right" as another's according to the premise of rights theory. Utilitarianism holds that it is irrelevant how many individuals are negatively impacted by an action. Corporations are required by law to adhere to the idea of corporate social responsibility.
An ethical theory known as utilitarianism establishes right from wrong by emphasizing results. It embodies consequentialism in some way. According to utilitarianism, the decision that will result in the greatest good for the largest number of people is the most morally right one.
Therefore, The correct answer is false.
Learn more about Theory, here;
https://brainly.com/question/22596849
#SPJ1
Shondra is a comptroller and has worked at both the local and state level in this position. She has been able to retain her same membership in the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees regardless of the level she worked at. Shondra is a member of a(n) _____ union.industrial
Shondra is member of an industrial union if she has worked at both local and state level in this position.
What is an industrial union?Workers in Finland's light and heavy industries are represented by the Industrial Union, a trade union. On January 1, 2018, the Industrial Union TEAM combined with the Metalworkers' Union and the Wood and Allied Workers' Union to form the union. It joined the Central Organization of Finnish Trade Unions, much like its forerunners. The Industrial Federation's representatives expressed their optimism that the Paperworkers' Union will join within a few years despite the union's decision to opt out of the merger that created it. The building and woodworkers' international, the International Association of food, agricultural, hotel, restaurant, catering, tobacco other allied workers' associations, and the UNI Worldwide Union are the four global union federations to which the union belongs.
To learn more about state, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20372541
#SPJ4
under the articles of confederation, the only other major powers reserved for congress were the ability to conduct foreign policy and raise an army for defense is
The statement given is true. Under the Articles of Confederation, the only other major powers reserved for Congress were the ability to conduct foreign policy and raise an army for defense.
What are the Articles of Confederation?The Articles of Confederation served as the written document which established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain.
The Articles of Confederation served as the first constitution, declaring that the confederacy of the former 13 colonies would be called The United States of America. The Articles of Confederation consisted of 13 articles which gave powers to a national government, that was led by Congress.
Learn more about Articles of Confederation at: https://brainly.com/question/13608970
#SPJ4
T/F- Interdependent power means that social movements with different goals can both be effective, even though they want different things.
The statement, Interdependent power means that social movements with different goals can both be effective, even though they want different things is False .
In order to answer this question, sociologist David Aberle (1966) created categories that distinguish between social movements by taking into account 1) what the movement is trying to alter and 2) how much change they are seeking.
The cultivation, nurturing, and connection of individuals and groups at the grassroots level to the movement's cause and to one another is essential for the success of social movements. Although they focus on a narrow segment of the population, redemptive social movements aim for a profound transformation.
To know more about social movements visit :
https://brainly.com/question/12881575
#SPJ4
a defendant charged with murder admitted to the killing but claimed that he shot the victim in self-defense as she attacked him with a knife. at trial, the investigating officer testified about the scene of the crime and the condition of the victim at the time of death. the prosecutor showed the officer a photograph of the scene of the crime taken by the police photographer and asked the officer whether the photograph accurately depicted what he had observed at the scene. the officer testified that it did. the photograph showed the deceased lying in a pool of blood with both her hands cut off.
Yes, its true that, according to the officer's testimony, yes. In the photos, the deceased was seen with both of her hands severed, laying in a pool of blood.
The accused murderer admitted to the crime but insisted that he killed the victim out of self-defense after she lunged at him with a knife. The investigating officer gave testimony during the trial on the crime scene and the victim's health at the time of death. The prosecutor questioned the officer if the police photographer's image of the crime scene adequately captured what he had seen there. The prosecutor then showed the officer the photo. According to the officer's testimony, yes.
In the photos, the deceased was seen with both of her hands severed, laying in a pool of blood. motive, planning, and earlier or later behavior.— Any truth that demonstrates or serves as a justification or preparation for any significant information or fact at issue is relevant.
Learn more about self-defense Visit: brainly.com/question/29542705
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
State true or false : A defendant charged with murder admitted to the killing but claimed that he shot the victim in self-defense as she attacked him with a knife. at trial, the investigating officer testified about the scene of the crime and the condition of the victim at the time of death. the prosecutor showed the officer a photograph of the scene of the crime taken by the police photographer and asked the officer whether the photograph accurately depicted what he had observed at the scene. the officer testified that it did. the photograph showed the deceased lying in a pool of blood with both her hands cut off.
bicyclists may ride in the left lane if they are on a one-way street with two or more lanes.true false
Bicyclists may ride in the left lane if they are on a one-way street with two or more lanes. This statement is true.
Under Washington law, bicycles are regarded as "vehicles." Even when a bicycle lane is established, bicycles are permitted to travel on the road in Washington and the majority of other states.
The sole exception is when a road has specific bicycle-related restrictions. Unless turning, dodging an object, or riding in the middle or left of the lane is necessary for safety, cyclists must stay on the right side of the road.
Bicyclists are still allowed to use the road even though they may go slower than the posted speed limit. The road is evenly shared by motorists and bicyclists.
Both should alternate turns in accordance with right-of-way regulations. All vehicles, including bicycles, must abide by these regulations.
To know more about bicyclist rules:
https://brainly.com/question/2519820
#SPJ4
what is the primary purpose of tort law?a. punish wrongdoersb. compensate victims for their lossesc. support society by fining wrongdoersd. create precedent in the common law
The main goal of tort law is to make amends for those who lose money or property as a result of another's wrongdoing and, if at all feasible, to prevent future wrongdoing.
A "tort law" is defined as "a private or civil wrong or injury, including a claim for a contract violation committed in bad faith, for which the court will grant relief in the form of an action for damages." The British common law system is where American tort law first emerged. Judges' years of written opinions in specific cases helped shape a sizable component of American tort law. The body of law is dynamic and practically changes every day as new cases prompt judges to analyze, affirm, or alter earlier rulings as well as address matters that had previously eluded resolution.
In the United States, tort law exists to compensate individuals for losses brought on by another party's behavior that falls below a standard of care outlined by the civil court.
To learn more about tort law please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/4313662
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. an institutionally designated authority, other than the investigator, should determine that proposed studies are exempt from regulatory requirements.
An institutionally designated authority, other than the investigator, should determine that proposed studies are exempt from regulatory requirements. - True
In the context of research involving human subjects, there is typically a designated Institutional Review Board or other institutional authority responsible for reviewing and approving research protocols to ensure that they meet ethical and regulatory standards. One of the responsibilities of the authority is to determine whether a proposed study is exempt from regulatory requirements, such as those related to informed consent or institutional review.
The institutional authority is usually composed of experts in various fields, such as medicine, law, and ethics, and is charged with reviewing research protocols to ensure that they meet the requirements of relevant regulations. It is important for the institutional authority to make these determinations in a consistent and fair manner, as they play a critical role in protecting the rights and welfare of human subjects participating in research.
Read more about regulatory requirements on:
https://brainly.com/question/14308151
#SPJ4
Which of the following were part of the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that was passed by Congress in 2010?:
1. Require sellers of asset-backed securities to maintain a portion of them.
2. Establishes a new commission, Business Financial Protection Agency, to protect businesses from bad investments.
3. Eliminate the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, giving their power over to the Fed.
4. Provide authority to the Federal Reserve to regulate all large financial institutions
5. Create a Financial Stability Oversight Council to watch risks of financial instability
The following are some of the provisions of the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which Congress passed in 2010: Option (1, 4, 5) are the correct choices.
1. "Require asset-backed securities dealers to retain a percentage of them."
4. "Give the Federal Reserve the power to oversee all significant financial institutions."
5. To monitor the dangers of financial instability, establish a Financial Stability Oversight Council.
Congress is the United States of America's federal legislative branch of government, charged with the duty of enacting and adopting federal laws on behalf of the populace. The freedom of speech clause in the first amendment is its most well-known provision. People can express themselves in this way, and the Supreme Court needs a good reason to get involved. The same applies to press freedom. Through the media and publications, it enables people to express themselves.
People are allowed to congregate as long as it's peaceful and not detrimental under the right to assemble. If they observe anything criminal occurring, the government has the right to step in. The Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which was approved by Congress in 2010 in the United States of America, includes the aforementioned measures and regulations.
Learn more about Congress visit: brainly.com/question/325850
#SPJ4
which of the following is not an important consideration in justifying the search of a vehicle under the carroll doctrine?
The Carroll approach does not place much importance on the fact that a vehicle rarely acts as a house when deciding whether to search it.
What is the main argument presented in Carroll v. US?Significance: Carroll claims that the Supreme Court ruled that police can search an automobile or another movable thing without a warrant. Just probable cause is needed for law enforcement to believe that the car contains evidence of a crime. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects privacy.
What is the Carroll Doctrine's history?The theory was initially established in the 1925 case Carroll v. the United States, in which bootleg whiskey being brought into Michigan from Canada was found following a search of the suspect's car under circumstances unrelated to a search incident to the arrest.
Learn more about Carroll v. the United States: https://brainly.com/question/13765568
#SPJ4
A federal law significantly curtailing disenfranchisement of racial and ethnic minorities by banning literacy tests and requiring federal supervision of jurisdictions with a history of voting discrimination is the
Voting Rights Act of 1965.
A federal law significantly curtailing disenfranchisement of racial and ethnic minorities by banning literacy tests and requiring federal supervision of jurisdictions with a history of voting discrimination is the -Voting Rights Act of 1965.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, the 36th President of the United States. The statute was passed in response to the discrimination African-Americans experienced when exercising their right to vote.
President Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act into law on May 26, 1965, following the occurrence of the Selma to Montgomery March on March 7, 1965. This statute grants African-Americans the right to vote whether or not they are literate. Racism against racial minorities was eradicated by Johnson's Voting Rights Act.
so, the correct answer is the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
For more info about 'Voting Rights Act of 1965' click on below link - https://brainly.com/question/13837059
#SPJ4
there is a direct correlation between the development of laws that criminalize a particular type of organized criminal behavior or activity and
There is a direct correlation between the development of laws that criminalize a particular type of organized criminal behavior or activity and the expansion of criminal enterprises.
What is an organized crime Why is it called organized?The fact that organized crime is "organized" is the key distinction between it and other types of criminal activity. In general, it excludes impulsive, ad hoc, and individual criminal activities. Instead, it only emphasizes deliberate actions that represent the work of teams of people.
Complex of highly centralized businesses organized as part of organized crime with the intention of carrying out unlawful activities. Such groups commit crimes such cargo theft, fraud, robbery, kidnapping for ransom, and extortion for "protection" fees.
For control of territory, organized criminal groups frequently engage in conflict with one another and occasionally form alliances. For instance, in earlier decades, Jewish and Italian criminal organizations collaborated to combat other organized crime organizations. Each of them has its own internal hierarchies, complete with leaders and followers.
To know more about organized crime, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/14568233
#SPJ4
according to the fifth amendment, private property may be taken for public use, as long as the government can show it has a legitimate use for it. t/f
The given statement is true. "No private property should be taken for the purpose of the public, without just recompense," states the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Private property cannot be taken for public use without just compensation, according to the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Such a take is said to result in an implied agreement to pay compensation. We have ruled that we lack the jurisdiction to resolve claims for unliquidated damages when the legal obligation of the United States to provide just compensation for the "taking" of private property has been established. However, such claims will only be granted in cases where the evidence of record allows for a substantially accurate calculation of the amount due.
The government must be able to demonstrate that the proposed use is public, that the public interest needs it, and that the property is required for that reason if a property owner challenges the legal basis for the seizure. Given these circumstances, stopping an eminent domain seizure is often quite challenging.
To learn more about Fifth Amendment please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/23133781
#SPJ4
for tax years beginning after december 31, 2015, which of the following statements regarding corporate tax filing requirements is false for corporations with a calendar year end?
Option a is Correct. The assertions regarding the corporate tax filing requirements for corporations with a calendar year end are untrue for tax years beginning after December 31, 2015. By the 15th day of the third month after the end of the tax year, corporations are required to submit their annual federal income tax returns.
It can be claimed that a dividend distribution to the extent of the corporation's profits and earnings is given precedence in terms of the tax treatment of a distribution from the corporation to its shareholders. The allocation of the tax liabilities that the buyer and seller are responsible for paying is shown by the tax incidence.
The funds that businesses and individuals provide to the government in order to fund national operations. Tax on corporate income Businesses pay them a portion of their earnings. Capital gains: Any earnings or gains realized by individuals or organizations through the sale of certain assets, such as stocks, bonds, or real estate, are subject to a capital gains tax. Property tax: A local government assesses a property tax, which the owner of the property is responsible for paying.
Learn more about tax visit: brainly.com/question/26316390
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2015, which of the following statements regarding corporate tax filing requirements is false for corporations with a calendar year end?
a. Corporations must file their annual federal income tax returns by the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year.
b. Calendar year corporations may request an automatic five-month extension of time to file their federal income tax returns.
c. An extension of the income tax filing deadline does not extend the payment deadline for any balance of tax due for the taxable year.
d. Corporations must file their annual federal income tax returns by 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year.
the officer tells a driver, stopped for a lawful traffic violation, that if he wants to he can attempt to repair a brake light to avoid a ticket. the driver opens the trunk and attempts a quick repair but in so doing exposes an illegal weapon in the trunk. the officer seizes the weapon and arrests the driver. at the suppression hearing, the court is likely to find that the search was
At the suppression hearing, the court is likely to find that the search was valid because the driver's actions indicate voluntariness.
A traffic stop of a vehicle and detainment of its inhabitants is a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes. A normal traffic stop is legitimate on the off chance that the cop genuinely thinks that the tenant is unlicensed or the vehicle is unregistered. The official needn't bother with a sensible doubt of the tenant's contribution in crimes. The sensible doubt of crimes found during the traffic stop might lead to a real terry stop.
State statutes can give authentic grounds to traffic stop makes sure that include less inconsistent interruption and don't fall inside Fourth Amendment searches and seizures. Sensible doubt is consequently pointless in these circumstances.
Besides, some state cases laid out that a traffic stop directed by government authorities other than cops may be genuine too on the off chance that the authorities have sensible doubt of some infringement of regulation.
to know more about the Fourth Amendment click here:
https://brainly.com/question/27414147
#SPJ4
______ is a presidential claim that certain communications with subordinates may be withheld from Congress, the Courts, and the American people.
Executive privilege is a requirement that a president can withhold certain communications with his subordinates from Congress, the courts, and the American people.
What are Executive Privileges and their uses?The doctrine of executive privilege defines the power of the president to withhold documents or information in his possession from the legislative or judicial branches of government. Executive immunity generally allows the president and his aides to refuse to produce documents or testify before the judiciary or Congress under certain circumstances.
What is the difference between executive order and executive privilege?Executive privilege is the power of the president to keep executive branch communications confidential, especially when it concerns communications related to national security. Executive Orders, on the other hand, are rules or regulations passed by the President that have the same effect and status as laws.
To learn more about executive privilege visit:
https://brainly.com/question/25657425
#SPJ4
two cigarette manufacturers (firm a and firm b) are faced with lawsuits from states to recover the healthcare related expenses associated with cigarette smoking. both cigarette firms have evidence that indicates that cigarette smoke causes lung cancer (and other related illnesses). state prosecutors do not have access to the same data used by cigarette manufacturers and thus will have difficulty recovering full costs without the help of at least one cigarette firm study. each firm has been presented with an opportunity to lower its liability in the suit if it cooperates with attorneys representing the states.
A dominant strategy for Firm B and Firm A are featured in a version of the prisoners' dilemma game.
How does dominant strategy work?
In game theory, a situation where one player has superior tactics regardless of how their opponent may play is referred to as the dominant strategy. That player has an advantage over the opposition in the game, all other things being equal. It means that the dominant player will always control the outcome, regardless of the opponent's tactics.
In game theory, participants use a variety of independent strategies to improve their decision-making in an effort to defeat the competition. Game theory is frequently used as a tactical tool by military, managers, consumers, players in oligopolistic markets, and players in games like The Chase.
Know more about dilemma game visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28984773
#SPJ4
In the alternative, San Diego and Orange County request the right to charge a $10,000 visa tax for any and all humans of any age, race, nationality or gender crossing into their counties without the proper federal visa documentation.
The peoples of San Diego and Orange county cite the following damages to their local environment, communities, citizens and public systems: Loss of minimum wage/low skill jobs for the youth, part-time workers and elderly, property crime, identity theft , drug crimes, DUI’s, assault and battery, sexual assaults and murder increases. Private businesses, particularly in border areas, have closed due to increasing and unabated crime. Public schools and hospitals are too overcrowded and underfunded to handle the non-paying patient increase. Many crossing the borders have the highly contagious Covid virus's or other communicable diseases that will require taxpayers to sacrifice significant tax dollars be expended on non citizens, while taxpaying citizen needs go unmet. Police and Fire departments are understaffed and underfunded to handle the large influx of population. Homeschooling has increased 30% in recent years due to the lack of school security and proper student-teacher ratios. All essential taxpayer services in the area of housing, health care, schooling and safety(police and fire) are being diverted from taxpaying Americans who include the very poor and homeless in order to assist those crossing into the state illegally. Tax revenues are finite but the need for the services grows exponentially every year due to this situation. Over the past 10 years the total costs from losses in wages, property, and lives has been estimated to be over $500B per day in the U.S. with no noticeable net increase to the tax collections derived from the illegal border crossings. While many of folks crossings hold jobs, over half of their income is sent back to their home countries and is not spent benefiting the U.S. economy.
What recourse does the bordering country of Mexico, San Diego and Orange Counties have and under what Jurisdiction and law?
Mexico, San Diego, and Orange, which share a border, have the option of forming a common council made up of the approved individuals who may speak on behalf of each of their respective nations.
Which definition of "citizen" is the best?A citizen is an individual who has been given full rights and obligations as a membership of a country or political body either by their place of birth, the ethnicity of one or perhaps both parents, or by naturalization.
Briefing:In the Case Relating To land Renovation by Singapore Throughout and Around The Johor Straits before ITLOS[9], the issue of fact of the dispute is been brought up when the unfavorable party challenged in court to verify the relevance of all its case, in according to the principle of earlier fatigue of discussions or local solutions, that extends to judges outside of the ICJ as well.
Orange County and San Diego County:
The majority of the matters even before Court are brand-new. Although the markets for electricity and natural gas are closely connected, there are differences in the problems the Court is trying to resolve. There is one incontrovertible distinction and one disputed disparity between the parties' views that compel the Court to decide in support of Plaintiffs. It is undeniable that FERC did not offer any remedy for the unethical trading actions that are the focus of Plaintiffs' allegations. The FERC has consistently concluded there were no restrictions in existence and that an remedy for the illegal conduct was not suitable, notwithstanding the defendant' claims that the FERC is the sole venue available to Plaintiffs seek redress. Second, the parties contest FERC's regulation of the spot market for fossil fuels.
To know more about Citizen visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27722655
#SPJ4