DC chooses a non-voting representative to the US House of Representatives who can propose legislation but cannot cast a ballot. Washington, DC is currently represented by Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton. DC residents cannot speak in Senate Committees or on the Senate floor.
Are there representatives from Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico?There are currently six non-voting members: one representative for each of the other four populated US Territories, including American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the US Vir-gin Islands; a resident commissioner for Puerto Rico; and one representative for the federal district of Washington, D.C.
Why are citizens of Washington, DC, not permitted to cast a ballot in Congress?According to the Constitution, each state is given voting representation in both houses of the US Congress. Since it is not a state but the capital of the country, the District of Columbia does not have voting representation in Congress.
Learn more about US House of Representatives : https://brainly.com/question/13835416
#SPJ4
Over 70 percent of Americans' political participation via community activities takes place in which of the following?
More than 70% of Americans participate in politics through community activities by:
B. Groups connected to schools.
C. Civic associations.
D. church-related organizations.
What does political engagement entail?
Political involvement is a social activity that the general public engages in on a voluntary basis to influence public policy, either directly or by influencing the decision-makers' choices. It has been demonstrated that membership in official organizations (such as Girl Scouts, Kiwanis, Rotary, PTA) or informal organizations (such as book clubs, bird watching clubs) increases social capital and reduces social isolation among members. This has the potential to indirectly benefit both the members' physical and mental wellbeing.
Voting in elections, supporting political campaigns, contributing to candidates, contacting officials, signing petitions, demonstrating, etc. are some examples of political participation actions.
Read more about political participation Visit:
brainly.com/question/1323955
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Over 70 percent of Americans political participation via community activities takes place in which of the following? multiple select question.
A. partisan
B. organizations school-related groups
C. civic organizations
D. church-related groups
imagine that a group of activists decided to start a movement around access to affordable housing in a major us city. identify the factors that, according to the political process model, would make the movement more successful.
The factors that, according to the political process model, would make the movement more successful are:
after a flurry of media headlines on the rising expense of housing, there was an upsurge in public awareness.among the movement's leaders, there is a significant organizational capacitya shared conviction in its power to bring about changeWhat is meant by social movements?A social movement is an intentional, concerted, and persistent effort made by individuals to alter (or maintain) a certain feature of their society through extrainstitutional or group actions.
Therefore, one can say that Political opportunity theory, commonly referred to as the political process theory or the political opportunity structure, is a strategy used by social movements and has been greatly inspired by political sociology. It contends that political chances play a major role in determining the success or failure of social movements.
Learn more about political process model from
https://brainly.com/question/2400522
#SPJ1
Which would a Supreme Court justice write if he or she disagreed with a ruling of the court?
answer choices
- majority opinion
- a per curiam opinion
- a dissenting opinion
- a concurring opinion
If a justice of the Supreme Court dissented from a decision, they would publish a dissenting opinion to explain their position to the public.
In certain legal systems, a dissenting opinion (or dissent) is an opinion in a case made by one or more judges that expresses disagreement with the majority opinion of the court that led to its verdict. This can also be referred to as a minority report when not necessarily referring to a legal ruling.
The majority opinion and any concurring views are often drafted at the same time as the dissenting opinion, which is also when it is presented and published. Although they can occasionally be used as a kind of persuasive authority in subsequent cases when arguing that the court's finding should be reduced or overturned, dissenting opinions do not establish binding precedent or become part of case law. In certain circumstances, a prior dissent is utilized to influence a change in the law, and a subsequent case may result in a majority judgment adopting a specific interpretation of the law that was previously supported in the dissent. Similar to concurring opinions, the disparity between the majority and dissenting views often provide light on the specific position held by the majority.
To learn more about dissenting opinion please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/11806601
#SPJ4
in the united states, laws are handed down by the executive branch in the form of common law.
The executive branch promulgates regulatory authority statutes in the form of common law.
What is the role of executive?Executives are typically in charge of developing the policies and plans that achieve organizational objectives. Managers direct, plan, and coordinate operational activities for an organization and corporation. They frequently travel to conferences and meetings as well as regional, local, national, and foreign branches and offices.
What is an example of executive?Another word that describes having the ability to make decisions is executive. Implementing legislation that will improve the quality of life for its residents is the responsibility of the president of the United States, which heads the executive branch of the government.
To know more about executive visit:
brainly.com/question/25988111
#SPJ4
according to the fifth amendment, private property may be taken for public use, as long as the government can show it has a legitimate use for it. t/f
The given statement is true. "No private property should be taken for the purpose of the public, without just recompense," states the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Private property cannot be taken for public use without just compensation, according to the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Such a take is said to result in an implied agreement to pay compensation. We have ruled that we lack the jurisdiction to resolve claims for unliquidated damages when the legal obligation of the United States to provide just compensation for the "taking" of private property has been established. However, such claims will only be granted in cases where the evidence of record allows for a substantially accurate calculation of the amount due.
The government must be able to demonstrate that the proposed use is public, that the public interest needs it, and that the property is required for that reason if a property owner challenges the legal basis for the seizure. Given these circumstances, stopping an eminent domain seizure is often quite challenging.
To learn more about Fifth Amendment please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/23133781
#SPJ4
in marbury v. madison, the supreme court established a principle that would eventually be used by all courts to
A. only the courts may regulate interstate commerce
B. the president may veto federal legislation
C. the courts may declare a federal law unconstitutional
D. only the president may issue an executive order
As a result of the Marbury v. Madison decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, the idea of judicial review the power of federal courts to deem legislative or executive actions unconstitutional was formed (1803).
The Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices are among the Supreme Court's nine current justices, making the total number of justices seven. The Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr. served as the Court's 17th Chief Justice, and there have been 104 Associate Justices throughout its existence.
What is the size of the Supreme Court?
Congress has the power to choose even the size of the Supreme Court; the current nine-member court, which consists of one Chief Justice and eight Associate Judges, has only existed since 1869, but there have previously been as few as six judges.
To learn more about Supreme Court please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
The increasing incidence of men "deserting" Democratic candidates for Republican ones involves attitudes about all of the following issues except
a. spending programs aimed at the poor.
b. the size of government.
c. the economy.
d. gun control.
e. gay rights.
The increasing incidence of men "deserting" Democratic candidates for Republican ones involves attitudes except the economy.
The survival of liberal democracy has been called into doubt as democratic countries have struggled in recent years with economic, social, and geopolitical turmoil. Democracy and civil freedoms have declined in many nations around the world, while populist candidates have surprised many observers by winning elections. While more established, formerly confident democracies have stumbled, exposing long-simmering vulnerabilities in their social fabrics and institutional systems, newly democratic nations have suffered. Four significant findings from our international studies about how people view democratic governance are as follows: People enjoy democracy, but their devotion to it is frequently not very strong; political and social differences are compounding the difficulties of contemporary democracy; and people desire a bigger public role in politics and government. For many, democracy is not delivering on its promises.
To learn more about Republican please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/1287768
#SPJ4
The Supreme Court first ruled that the First Amendment provided some protectionfrom government regulation of commercial speech in a case involvingA. a letter to the editor in which Nike defended its overseas facilities.B. interstate advertising for casinos.C. a tobacco ad using cartoon characters.D. an advertisement for the civil rights movement.
The correct answer is D). an advertisement for the civil rights movement. In a case regarding the government's restriction of commercial speech, the Supreme Court initially determined that the First Amendment afforded some protection.
First, the commercial communication must not be deceptive and must relate legitimate activities in order to qualify as protected speech under the First Amendment.
Blackmun came to the conclusion that the First Amendment protects commercial speech, even communications like advertisements that only hint at a business transaction.
An online advertisement, such as those found in video games, is an illustration of commercial speech. Flyer distribution to raise awareness of a product is another example of a commercial speech. Another excellent example of advertising communication is on television.
Read more about Supreme Court at
https://brainly.com/question/1107784
#SPJ4
he has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
This is in relation to the requirement that each colony's top executive or colonial governor is required to suspend certain laws until the King provides his consent.
The governor's duties are what?As a result, governors are responsible for enforcing state laws and setting policy for the state executive branch. As state leaders, governors can pursue new and modified policies and programs through a variety of tools, such as executive orders, executive budgets, legislative bills, and vetoes.
Do all states have governors?Every state will have a governor (Articles 153 of the Constitution of India). According to the Indian Constitution, the Governor shall hold the executive power of the State and may use it himself or through persons who report to him (Article 154).
To know more about governors visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11254312
#SPJ4
a defendant charged with murder admitted to the killing but claimed that he shot the victim in self-defense as she attacked him with a knife. at trial, the investigating officer testified about the scene of the crime and the condition of the victim at the time of death. the prosecutor showed the officer a photograph of the scene of the crime taken by the police photographer and asked the officer whether the photograph accurately depicted what he had observed at the scene. the officer testified that it did. the photograph showed the deceased lying in a pool of blood with both her hands cut off.
Yes, its true that, according to the officer's testimony, yes. In the photos, the deceased was seen with both of her hands severed, laying in a pool of blood.
The accused murderer admitted to the crime but insisted that he killed the victim out of self-defense after she lunged at him with a knife. The investigating officer gave testimony during the trial on the crime scene and the victim's health at the time of death. The prosecutor questioned the officer if the police photographer's image of the crime scene adequately captured what he had seen there. The prosecutor then showed the officer the photo. According to the officer's testimony, yes.
In the photos, the deceased was seen with both of her hands severed, laying in a pool of blood. motive, planning, and earlier or later behavior.— Any truth that demonstrates or serves as a justification or preparation for any significant information or fact at issue is relevant.
Learn more about self-defense Visit: brainly.com/question/29542705
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
State true or false : A defendant charged with murder admitted to the killing but claimed that he shot the victim in self-defense as she attacked him with a knife. at trial, the investigating officer testified about the scene of the crime and the condition of the victim at the time of death. the prosecutor showed the officer a photograph of the scene of the crime taken by the police photographer and asked the officer whether the photograph accurately depicted what he had observed at the scene. the officer testified that it did. the photograph showed the deceased lying in a pool of blood with both her hands cut off.
the officer tells a driver, stopped for a lawful traffic violation, that if he wants to he can attempt to repair a brake light to avoid a ticket. the driver opens the trunk and attempts a quick repair but in so doing exposes an illegal weapon in the trunk. the officer seizes the weapon and arrests the driver. at the suppression hearing, the court is likely to find that the search was
At the suppression hearing, the court is likely to find that the search was valid because the driver's actions indicate voluntariness.
A traffic stop of a vehicle and detainment of its inhabitants is a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes. A normal traffic stop is legitimate on the off chance that the cop genuinely thinks that the tenant is unlicensed or the vehicle is unregistered. The official needn't bother with a sensible doubt of the tenant's contribution in crimes. The sensible doubt of crimes found during the traffic stop might lead to a real terry stop.
State statutes can give authentic grounds to traffic stop makes sure that include less inconsistent interruption and don't fall inside Fourth Amendment searches and seizures. Sensible doubt is consequently pointless in these circumstances.
Besides, some state cases laid out that a traffic stop directed by government authorities other than cops may be genuine too on the off chance that the authorities have sensible doubt of some infringement of regulation.
to know more about the Fourth Amendment click here:
https://brainly.com/question/27414147
#SPJ4
Carlos, who is 22 years old, is employed as a security officer at JJ Security Corp., which is a private firm. The manager of JJ Security intends to retain employees who are older as he feels that they are likely to perform better. He fires Carlos and replaces him with Samuel, who is 54 years old. Which of the following statements is most likely to be true in this case? A) Carlos will win an age discrimination suit under the ADEA against JJSecurity as it is illegal to fire an employee on the basis of age. B) Carlos cannot file an age discrimination suit against JJ Security as reverse discrimination is not covered under the ADEA. C) Carlos will win an age discrimination suit under the ADEA against JJ Security as he is a member of the protected class. D) Carlos cannot file an age discrimination suit against JJ Security under the ADEA as it is applicable only to federal employees
Answer: B Feedback: In this case, Carlos cannot file an age discrimination suit against JJ Security Corp. as reverse discrimination is not covered under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act only protects employees over 40 from discrimination. Unlike Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, there is no protection from reverse discrimination.
Among all the given statements, the one that is most likely to be true in the given case is: “Carlos cannot file an age discrimination suit against JJ Security as reverse discrimination is not covered under the ADEA.” Hence, Option B is correct.
Carlos is unable to launch a lawsuit for age discrimination against JJ Security Corp. in this instance because the Age Discrimination in Employment Act does not cover reverse discrimination.
Employees over 40 are the only ones protected from discrimination by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Reverse discrimination is not covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Carlos, a security officer who is 22 years old, works for a private company called JJ Security Corp. The manager of JJ Security plans to keep older workers because he believes they would perform better. Carlos is fired, and Samuel, a 54-year-old man, is brought in to replace him.
Therefore, Option B is correct.
Learn more about Carlos from here:
https://brainly.com/question/18891707
#SPJ4
according to which of the following, does the electoral system condition the type of party system that will result? quizlewt
Duverger's law does the electoral system condition the type of party system that will result.
In political science, Duverger's law holds that single-voting from majoritarian elections with single-part districts (such as first past the post) will quite often lean toward a two-party system. The discovery of this propensity is credited to Maurice Duverger, a French sociologist who observed the impact and kept it in several papers published during the 1950s and 1960s. In the course of further research, other political scientists started considering the impact of a "law" or guideline.
As a corollary to the law, Duverger also asserted that corresponding representation favors multi-partyism, as does the majority system with overflow elections.
Duverger's law draws from a model of causality from the electoral system to a party system. A corresponding representation (PR) system creates electoral conditions that foster the improvement of many parties, whereas a majority system marginalizes smaller political parties, by and large resulting in a two-party system.
to know more about electoral system click here:
https://brainly.com/question/24079474
#SPJ4
In the alternative, San Diego and Orange County request the right to charge a $10,000 visa tax for any and all humans of any age, race, nationality or gender crossing into their counties without the proper federal visa documentation.
The peoples of San Diego and Orange county cite the following damages to their local environment, communities, citizens and public systems: Loss of minimum wage/low skill jobs for the youth, part-time workers and elderly, property crime, identity theft , drug crimes, DUI’s, assault and battery, sexual assaults and murder increases. Private businesses, particularly in border areas, have closed due to increasing and unabated crime. Public schools and hospitals are too overcrowded and underfunded to handle the non-paying patient increase. Many crossing the borders have the highly contagious Covid virus's or other communicable diseases that will require taxpayers to sacrifice significant tax dollars be expended on non citizens, while taxpaying citizen needs go unmet. Police and Fire departments are understaffed and underfunded to handle the large influx of population. Homeschooling has increased 30% in recent years due to the lack of school security and proper student-teacher ratios. All essential taxpayer services in the area of housing, health care, schooling and safety(police and fire) are being diverted from taxpaying Americans who include the very poor and homeless in order to assist those crossing into the state illegally. Tax revenues are finite but the need for the services grows exponentially every year due to this situation. Over the past 10 years the total costs from losses in wages, property, and lives has been estimated to be over $500B per day in the U.S. with no noticeable net increase to the tax collections derived from the illegal border crossings. While many of folks crossings hold jobs, over half of their income is sent back to their home countries and is not spent benefiting the U.S. economy.
What recourse does the bordering country of Mexico, San Diego and Orange Counties have and under what Jurisdiction and law?
Mexico, San Diego, and Orange, which share a border, have the option of forming a common council made up of the approved individuals who may speak on behalf of each of their respective nations.
Which definition of "citizen" is the best?A citizen is an individual who has been given full rights and obligations as a membership of a country or political body either by their place of birth, the ethnicity of one or perhaps both parents, or by naturalization.
Briefing:In the Case Relating To land Renovation by Singapore Throughout and Around The Johor Straits before ITLOS[9], the issue of fact of the dispute is been brought up when the unfavorable party challenged in court to verify the relevance of all its case, in according to the principle of earlier fatigue of discussions or local solutions, that extends to judges outside of the ICJ as well.
Orange County and San Diego County:
The majority of the matters even before Court are brand-new. Although the markets for electricity and natural gas are closely connected, there are differences in the problems the Court is trying to resolve. There is one incontrovertible distinction and one disputed disparity between the parties' views that compel the Court to decide in support of Plaintiffs. It is undeniable that FERC did not offer any remedy for the unethical trading actions that are the focus of Plaintiffs' allegations. The FERC has consistently concluded there were no restrictions in existence and that an remedy for the illegal conduct was not suitable, notwithstanding the defendant' claims that the FERC is the sole venue available to Plaintiffs seek redress. Second, the parties contest FERC's regulation of the spot market for fossil fuels.
To know more about Citizen visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27722655
#SPJ4
when the interview process shifts from investigatory to accusatory---when its focus is on the accused and its purpose is to elicit a confession.
When interview process shifts from investigatory to accusatory with purpose is to elicit a confession then the accused must be permitted to consult with his lawyer
If the interview process shifts from investigatory to accusatory, with the purpose of eliciting a confession, it is particularly important that the accused be permitted to consult with a lawyer. This is because the stakes are higher in this situation and the accused may be at greater risk of making a statement that could be used against them in court.
It is crucial that individuals accused of a crime are afforded certain rights during the criminal justice process. One of these rights is the right to legal counsel. The right to legal counsel applies at all stages of the criminal justice process, not just during interrogations. If a person is accused of a crime, it is in their best interest to exercise their right to legal counsel and seek the advice of a lawyer as soon as possible.
Read more about the accused on:
https://brainly.com/question/23966174
#SPJ4
for tax years beginning after december 31, 2015, which of the following statements regarding corporate tax filing requirements is false for corporations with a calendar year end?
Option a is Correct. The assertions regarding the corporate tax filing requirements for corporations with a calendar year end are untrue for tax years beginning after December 31, 2015. By the 15th day of the third month after the end of the tax year, corporations are required to submit their annual federal income tax returns.
It can be claimed that a dividend distribution to the extent of the corporation's profits and earnings is given precedence in terms of the tax treatment of a distribution from the corporation to its shareholders. The allocation of the tax liabilities that the buyer and seller are responsible for paying is shown by the tax incidence.
The funds that businesses and individuals provide to the government in order to fund national operations. Tax on corporate income Businesses pay them a portion of their earnings. Capital gains: Any earnings or gains realized by individuals or organizations through the sale of certain assets, such as stocks, bonds, or real estate, are subject to a capital gains tax. Property tax: A local government assesses a property tax, which the owner of the property is responsible for paying.
Learn more about tax visit: brainly.com/question/26316390
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2015, which of the following statements regarding corporate tax filing requirements is false for corporations with a calendar year end?
a. Corporations must file their annual federal income tax returns by the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year.
b. Calendar year corporations may request an automatic five-month extension of time to file their federal income tax returns.
c. An extension of the income tax filing deadline does not extend the payment deadline for any balance of tax due for the taxable year.
d. Corporations must file their annual federal income tax returns by 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year.
by 2014 23 u.s. states had authorized marijuana smoking for the relief of pain and discomfort or the control of nausea and weight loss.
by 2014 23 US states had authorized marijuana smoking for the relief of pain and discomfort or the control of nausea and weight loss. This statement is true.
What consequences might marijuana use cause?These side effects, which may include altered perception, impaired coordination and balance, and tiredness, might persist for more than four hours following marijuana usage. These side effects, which might include personality changes and memory issues, can happen when marijuana is used heavily over an extended period of time.
Cannabis was publicly marketed in pharmacies in the late 19th century and quickly gained popularity as a constituent in numerous medicines. Following the Mexican Revolution of 1910, a wave of immigrants from Mexico entered the country, introducing marijuana use for recreational purposes.
The most widely used psychoactive substance derived from the cannabis plant, determined by its origin within the plant and subsequent THC content. The THC content is between 1 and 6 percent on average.
To know more about marijuana, refer;
https://brainly.com/question/18759936
#SPJ4
A Republican candidate for U.S. Senate has hired a pollster who conducts a poll among likely voters across the state and collects a sample of over 2,500 respondents. He conducted his poll carefully, but his sample has 65% women and 35% men. What technique in measuring public opinion must the pollster use to make the poll accurately reflect public opinion?
A Republican candidate for U.S. Senate has hired a pollster who conducts a poll among likely voters across the state and collects a sample of over 2,500 respondents. His sample has 65% women and 35% men. The technique that should be used by the pollster to measure public opinion is stratification.
Sorting information, people, and things into separate groups or levels is known as stratification. The fluctuation may result from staff, equipment, or material neglect or from shift-related factors, among others. We categorize or group the problem in the homogeneous set of data in order to understand it. This facilitates data comprehension and provides deeper insights into a process. Our goal is to gather a sample that closely mimics the entire population prior to gathering data. There are various techniques for gathering samples. In certain situations, stratification is used to gather a sample in order to obtain a more accurate representation of the population and conduct further analysis.
We can learn more about stratification here:
https://brainly.com/question/14879537#
#SPJ4
which of the following does the ftc funeral rule not prohibit you from doing? question 121 options: embalming for a fee without permission requiring the purchase of a casket for direct cremation requiring consumers to buy certain funeral goods and services as a condition for furnishing other funeral goods or services listing options such as direct cremation with memorial service on the gpl
In order to provide other funeral goods or services, such as direct cremation with memorial service, the GPL needs customers to purchase specific funeral products and services. Embalming for a fee without authorization also requires the purchase of a casket for direct cremation.
The Funeral Rule was created to protect consumers by requiring that they have sufficient information about the goods and repairs they will purchase from a ceremony provider. It was enacted by the Federal Trade Commission on April 30, 1984, and it was revised with effect from 1994.
The ceremonial Rule should be followed by all funeral suppliers. The Ceremony Rule defines terminology like "funeral provider," "funeral goods," and "funeral services," among others, and outlines several client rights as well as the precise guidelines by which providers of funeral goods and services must respect consumer rights and conduct their operations. To lessen the likelihood of misunderstandings between the provider of ceremonial services and the client, the ceremonial Rule describes in detail a variety of funeral rites.
To learn more about Embalming please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/5523263
#SPJ4
FILL IN THE BLANK. ________ was the former Texas Speaker of the House who was indicted for taking an illegal gift from a law firm that specialized in collecting delinquent taxes for local governments.
Gib Lewis was the former Texas Speaker of the House who was indicted for taking an illegal gift from a law firm that specialized in collecting delinquent taxes for local governments.
In 1991, Speaker Gibson D. 'Gib" Lewis (1937-) turned into the primary individual in Texas history to be elected presiding official of the Place of Agents for five terms. Lewis, a 11-term lawmaker from Tarrant District, brought to the speakership a way of thinking underlining the panel cycle, which he considered the core of lawmaking.
Lewis was brought into the world in Oletha, Texas, and spent his initial a long time in Mexia. He was graduated from Cleveland Secondary School in 1955 and attended Sam Houston State Educators School prior to proceeding with his studies at Texas Christian College during the period he was assigned to Carswell Flying corps Base in Stronghold Worth. Following four years in the Air Power, Lewis accepted a position in 1961 as a sales rep for a paper organization and, after three years, opened his own firm having some expertise in pressure-touchy marks and decals. Lewis go on as president of Lewis Mark Products, Inc., today, three decades after its founding.
Lewis first became involved in civic participation in 1969 when he was elected to the Stream Oaks City Committee. Following a fruitful mission for a seat in the Texas Place of Agents, he arrived in Austin in 1971 as an individual from the Post Worth delegation.
to know more about civic participation click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1896977
#SPJ4
under the articles of confederation, the only other major powers reserved for congress were the ability to conduct foreign policy and raise an army for defense is
The statement given is true. Under the Articles of Confederation, the only other major powers reserved for Congress were the ability to conduct foreign policy and raise an army for defense.
What are the Articles of Confederation?The Articles of Confederation served as the written document which established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain.
The Articles of Confederation served as the first constitution, declaring that the confederacy of the former 13 colonies would be called The United States of America. The Articles of Confederation consisted of 13 articles which gave powers to a national government, that was led by Congress.
Learn more about Articles of Confederation at: https://brainly.com/question/13608970
#SPJ4
When judges rely on prior court rulings to help decide an issue, they are using the doctrine of:
there is a direct correlation between the development of laws that criminalize a particular type of organized criminal behavior or activity and
There is a direct correlation between the development of laws that criminalize a particular type of organized criminal behavior or activity and the expansion of criminal enterprises.
What is an organized crime Why is it called organized?The fact that organized crime is "organized" is the key distinction between it and other types of criminal activity. In general, it excludes impulsive, ad hoc, and individual criminal activities. Instead, it only emphasizes deliberate actions that represent the work of teams of people.
Complex of highly centralized businesses organized as part of organized crime with the intention of carrying out unlawful activities. Such groups commit crimes such cargo theft, fraud, robbery, kidnapping for ransom, and extortion for "protection" fees.
For control of territory, organized criminal groups frequently engage in conflict with one another and occasionally form alliances. For instance, in earlier decades, Jewish and Italian criminal organizations collaborated to combat other organized crime organizations. Each of them has its own internal hierarchies, complete with leaders and followers.
To know more about organized crime, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/14568233
#SPJ4
______ is a presidential claim that certain communications with subordinates may be withheld from Congress, the Courts, and the American people.
Executive privilege is a requirement that a president can withhold certain communications with his subordinates from Congress, the courts, and the American people.
What are Executive Privileges and their uses?The doctrine of executive privilege defines the power of the president to withhold documents or information in his possession from the legislative or judicial branches of government. Executive immunity generally allows the president and his aides to refuse to produce documents or testify before the judiciary or Congress under certain circumstances.
What is the difference between executive order and executive privilege?Executive privilege is the power of the president to keep executive branch communications confidential, especially when it concerns communications related to national security. Executive Orders, on the other hand, are rules or regulations passed by the President that have the same effect and status as laws.
To learn more about executive privilege visit:
https://brainly.com/question/25657425
#SPJ4
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates the linkage function that the National Association of Realtors (NAR) would have with regard to a recently passed federal law protecting home buyers?
Sponsoring a new candidate and mobilizing voters to unseat the author of the legislation in the next election
Investigating and reporting possible corruption in the passage of home buyer protection legislation
Sharing research and constituent preferences for enforcing the law at a Housing and Urban Development (HUD) hearing
Submitting an amicus curiae brief for the federal district court to review and overturn the recently passed law
The scenario that best illustrates the linkage function that the National Association of Realtors(NAR) would have with regard to a recently passed federal law protecting home buyers is Sharing research and constituent preferences for enforcing the law at a (HUD) hearing.
The National Association of Realtors (NAR) can be described s a professional organization for real estate agents and other industry professionals in the U.S. and abroad. It should be noted that the mission of the Department of Housing and Urban Development was to create strong, sustainable, inclusive communities as well as quality affordable homes. A federal monarchy, in the strict feel, is a federation of states with a married monarch as ordinary head of the federation, but preserving one-of-a-kind monarchs, or having a non-monarchical system of presidency, inside the various states joined to the federation.
Learn more about federal here
https://brainly.com/question/220248
#SPJ4
since the commercial speech doctrine was established in the central hudson case, it has remained unchanged.
The given statement is False, which states that, since the primary Hudson case, where the commercial speech doctrine was founded, it has not changed.
The Central Hudson test is used by the Supreme Court to decide whether a restriction on commercial speech is allowed under the First Amendment. It originates from Central Hudson Gas & Elec. Co. v. Public Serv. Comm. of New York, the ruling that bears the same name.
Previously, there was no free speech protection for commercial communication. "We are equally clear that the Constitution imposes no such constraint on government as it concerns simply commercial advertising," the Supreme Court stated in Valentine V Chrestensen (1942).
The Central Hudson test continues to be the standard in the law governing commercial communication. However, a few of justices have objected to it. In recent judgments like 44 Liquormart and most recently Sorrell V IMS Health, the Court has strengthened free speech protections for commercial communication. The Central Hudson test has endured, and it is still a sound legal principle.
To learn more about Hudson case please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/13171425
#SPJ4
what is the primary purpose of tort law?a. punish wrongdoersb. compensate victims for their lossesc. support society by fining wrongdoersd. create precedent in the common law
The main goal of tort law is to make amends for those who lose money or property as a result of another's wrongdoing and, if at all feasible, to prevent future wrongdoing.
A "tort law" is defined as "a private or civil wrong or injury, including a claim for a contract violation committed in bad faith, for which the court will grant relief in the form of an action for damages." The British common law system is where American tort law first emerged. Judges' years of written opinions in specific cases helped shape a sizable component of American tort law. The body of law is dynamic and practically changes every day as new cases prompt judges to analyze, affirm, or alter earlier rulings as well as address matters that had previously eluded resolution.
In the United States, tort law exists to compensate individuals for losses brought on by another party's behavior that falls below a standard of care outlined by the civil court.
To learn more about tort law please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/4313662
#SPJ4
which of the following is not an important consideration in justifying the search of a vehicle under the carroll doctrine?
The Carroll approach does not place much importance on the fact that a vehicle rarely acts as a house when deciding whether to search it.
What is the main argument presented in Carroll v. US?Significance: Carroll claims that the Supreme Court ruled that police can search an automobile or another movable thing without a warrant. Just probable cause is needed for law enforcement to believe that the car contains evidence of a crime. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects privacy.
What is the Carroll Doctrine's history?The theory was initially established in the 1925 case Carroll v. the United States, in which bootleg whiskey being brought into Michigan from Canada was found following a search of the suspect's car under circumstances unrelated to a search incident to the arrest.
Learn more about Carroll v. the United States: https://brainly.com/question/13765568
#SPJ4
T/F- Interdependent power means that social movements with different goals can both be effective, even though they want different things.
The statement, Interdependent power means that social movements with different goals can both be effective, even though they want different things is False .
In order to answer this question, sociologist David Aberle (1966) created categories that distinguish between social movements by taking into account 1) what the movement is trying to alter and 2) how much change they are seeking.
The cultivation, nurturing, and connection of individuals and groups at the grassroots level to the movement's cause and to one another is essential for the success of social movements. Although they focus on a narrow segment of the population, redemptive social movements aim for a profound transformation.
To know more about social movements visit :
https://brainly.com/question/12881575
#SPJ4
According to the Preamble, the Constitution was intended to (select all that apply).
provide for the common defense
establish justice
limit the power of government
promote general welfare
The Preamble states that the Constitution's goals were to establish justice, fund the common defense, and advance the public welfare.
What is the main purpose of the constitution?
It outlines the constitutionally guaranteed rights of citizens that organizations, regulations, and laws must preserve. In terms of politics, it establishes, distributes, and places restrictions on governmental power as well as providing forums for discussing and deciding on public policy.
The Constitution – is it a law?
The fundamental law of the United States is the Constitution. It formalizes the people's fundamental principles. The interpretation of any laws approved by Congress, as well as the meaning of the Constitution, must be determined by the courts.
To know more about constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ4