the answers for this please help i need the answers by tonight!

Hamlet's anger towards ignorance is demonstrated in several ways throughout the play. A notable examples is in his soliloquy in Act II, Scene 2, where he criticizes the actors who are performing for the court.

"O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I! Is it not monstrous that this player here, But in a fiction, in a dream of passion, Could force his soul so to his own conceit That from her working all his visage wanned, Tears in his eyes, distraction in's aspect, A broken voice, and his whole function suiting With forms to his conceit? And all for nothing!"

In this passage, Hamlet is expressing his frustration with his own inability to take action and his sense of shame and inadequacy in comparison to the actors. He sees their passion and ability to bring their characters to life as a rebuke to his own inaction and lack of conviction.

Overall, Hamlet's anger towards ignorance is a key theme of the play. He is frustrated by the inability of those around him to see the truth and take action, and he sees ignorance as a barrier to justice and morality.

Learn more about Hamlet:

https://brainly.com/question/30233371

#SPJ11

Answer:

( I'm not sure if I'm right, i hope it helped, I'm not even in highschool yet )

Explanation:

How did other nations respond to the Marshall Plan?

Most European nations responded favorably to the initial Marshall proposal. Insisting on a role in designing the program, 16 nations attended a conference in Paris (July 12, 1947) at which they established the Committee of European Economic Cooperation (CEEC).

The authors of poem, letter, and speech form opinions and make arguments and claims about America in different ways, as their works vary in form and purpose in the battles.

Battles are violent confrontations between two or more groups with opposing goals, typically fought using weapons and military tactics. They can take place on land, at sea, or in the air and can range in scale from small skirmishes to large-scale conflicts involving thousands of soldiers. Battles can have significant historical, cultural, and political significance, often shaping the course of nations and societies. They are typically fought to achieve specific strategic objectives, such as capturing territory or resources, defending against invasion, or achieving political or ideological goals. Battles can have profound and lasting effects on the lives of those involved, causing physical and emotional trauma, and often resulting in death or injury for soldiers and civilians alike.

To learn more about battles, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30150803

#SPJ1

The Nile River was the most important trade route in Ancient Egypt, as it provided a convenient transportation route through the heart of the country. The Nile River flows from the south to the north, and its current made it easier for ships to travel upstream.

This made it possible for merchants to transport goods from Nubia and other southern regions to the delta region in the north. The Nile also provided a source of water for irrigation, which made it possible for farmers to grow crops along its banks.

The other major trade routes in Egypt were the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. The Red Sea provided access to the Arabian Peninsula and East Africa, while the Mediterranean Sea offered a connection to Europe and the rest of the Mediterranean world.

To know more about Egyptian routes:

https://brainly.com/question/20071624

#SPJ4

The reaction to the announcement of an armistice varied depending on the individual soldier and their personal experiences during the war.

The announcement of an armistice or ceasefire during the war was a welcome relief for many soldiers who had been fighting for extended periods of time. The war had taken a significant toll on their physical and mental well-being, and the announcement of the end of hostilities was a ray of hope in an otherwise bleak situation.

For many soldiers, the news of an armistice meant that they would finally be able to return home to their families and loved ones. The prospect of being reunited with their loved ones after months or even years of separation was a source of immense joy and relief for many.

However, not all soldiers were thrilled with the news of an armistice. Some soldiers felt that the end of the war was premature, and that the conflict could have been resolved differently. Others were concerned about the fate of their comrades who had been injured or killed in the fighting.

Overall, the reaction to the announcement of an armistice varied depending on the individual soldier and their personal experiences during the war. However, for many, the news was a long-awaited reprieve from the horrors of war and a chance to start rebuilding their lives.

For more such questions on individual soldier

https://brainly.com/question/30647243

#SPJ11

Women’s identity in the period from 1900 to 1945 was profoundly influenced by both peacetime and wartime experiences.

During peacetime, women were expected to fulfill traditional roles such as homemakers, wives and mothers, often with limited access to education and employment. Women were largely excluded from politics and were denied the right to vote in many places. During wartime, women were increasingly called upon to take on new roles such as factory workers, nurses and even military personnel.

This enabled them to gain more independence and access to greater educational and employment opportunities. In addition, as men went off to war, women had to take on the responsibility of managing households and farms, and thereby gained greater respect and recognition. Thus, women’s roles changed significantly during this period, as they moved away from traditional roles to become more independent and empowered.

To know more about wartime , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30188182

#SPJ4

The power of judicial review is an important check on the legislative and executive branches of government. This power is established judicially and allows for the determination of the constitutionality of laws and acts of the United States and Virginia.

The Supreme Court is the supreme court of the land and has the power of judicial review at the national level. The case of Marbury v. Madison established this power. The U.S. Constitution and Virginia Constitution determine the law of the land, and state laws must conform to both of these constitutions.

1. If the Supreme Court finds a law in conflict with the Constitution, it declares the law unconstitutional.

2. State laws must conform to the U.S. Constitution.

3. One function of the Supreme Court is to determine the constitutionality of laws.

learn more about judicial review: https://brainly.com/question/14027482

#SPJ1

Answer:

they are permitted to join an industry arrangement known as a trust.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court made the declaration because constitution guarantees right to privacy for all the citizens.

Declaration refers to the series of important declarations made throughout human history that have had significant impacts on politics, society, and culture. Some of the most notable declarations include the Magna Carta, which established the principle of limited government in England in 1215; the Declaration of Independence, which declared the American colonies independent from Great Britain in 1776; and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was adopted by the United Nations in 1948 and outlined basic human rights that should be protected globally. These declarations often represent turning points in history and have helped shape the world as we know it today. They have also served as inspiration for other declarations and movements seeking to promote justice, equality, and freedom.

To learn more about declaration, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2159173

#SPJ1

Complete Question:

Which statement explains why the Supreme Court made declaration?

A. The Constitution guarantees a right to privacy for all citizens.

B. The Constitution implies protections for rights that are not directly mentioned.

C. The Constitution requires equal protection of the laws for all groups of people.

D. The Constitution grants voting rights to all citizens regardless of race or ethnicity.

Answer:

Betty Ireland

Explanation:

From 2005-2009.

The rapid increase in the supply of money was one of the main factors that contributed to hyperinflation in Germany after World War I, but it was not the only factor.

Other elements that led to Germany's hyperinflation included:

War reparations: Following World War I, Germany was required to pay enormous reparations to the Allied nations.

Economic Instability: During this period, Germany had significant economic instability, which was compounded by the effects of World War I.

Political Instability: During this time period, Germany experienced tremendous political instability, with multiple different governments coming and exiting.

Speculation: Speculators also contributed to hyperinflation by stockpiling goods and assets in expectation of future price hikes.

For such more question on hyperinflation:

https://brainly.com/question/30780353

#SPJ11

D:   He understood the potential for the destruction the bomb could cause in the world.

The common theme among the terms listed is they were all used to disenfranchise African-Americans in the South in the years following the Civil War and Reconstruction. The correct option is C.

The "Grandfather Clause," literacy tests, poll taxes, and the "White Primary" were all methods employed by Southern states in the late 1800s and early 1900s to deny African Americans the opportunity to exercise their right to vote. The 15th Amendment, which provided African American men the right to vote and was successful in suppressing the black vote for many years, was avoided by these measures.

Thus, the ideal selection is option C.

Learn more about African-Americans here:

https://brainly.com/question/24318057

#SPJ1

Correct option is [B],

According to Soviet leadership, the only way of ensuring a lasting peace in the world was through a revolution replacing capitalist elites with a global classless society.

This idea was based on the Marxist theory of communism, which called for the overthrow of the capitalist class by the working class and the establishment of a socialist society that would eventually evolve into a classless communist society.

Learn more about Soviet leadership

https://brainly.com/question/29763392

The President was accused of using a variety of methods to cover up the June 17, 1972 break-in at Watergate.

These included paying hush money to the burglars, ordering the CIA to block the FBI investigation into the burglary, pressuring the FBI to drop their investigation, firing the Watergate Special Prosecutor, lying to the American public about his involvement in the break-in, and destroying evidence related to the burglary.

He was also accused of making false statements to the press, covering up the involvement of other White House staff, and diverting attention away from the burglary by creating an “enemies list” and using other methods to harass his political opponents. All of these alleged actions were eventually used to support the articles of impeachment against the President.

To know more about Watergate, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/11778920

#SPJ1

Stanislavski devised a system that could be taught to others for  achieving the kind of believability demand by the new realistic drama being written in the late nineteenth century.

Stanislavski's method, commonly known as the "Method," emphasised emotional authenticity and psychological realism in acting. He felt that performers should attempt to thoroughly inhabit their characters, to feel their emotions, and to act in accordance with their characters' thoughts, feelings, and intentions.

The Method incorporated a variety of skills, such as emotional memory, sensory awareness, and improvisation, and it emphasised the significance of meticulous preparation and rehearsal. Stanislavski's approach was created to assist performers in developing fully realised characters who were convincing and emotionally relevant for audiences.

For such more question on demand:

https://brainly.com/question/2398546

#SPJ11

The article examines court opinion about the green belt movements while the lecture is an overview of Mathai's life sentence best states a difference between the article and the lecture. Thus, option (a) is correct.

While the lecture gives an outline of Mathai's life, the article concentrates on judicial rulings regarding the green belt movements. In Kenya, Wangari Maathai established the green belt movement in 1977. It was a grassroots environmental campaign.

The movement's primary goals were the empowerment of women, the promotion of environmental preservation, and the planting of trees. In Kenya, the movement was successful in supporting sustainable development and increasing awareness of environmental issues.

As a result, the significance of the sentence best states a difference between the article and the lecture are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (a) is correct.

Learn more about on article, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14172780

#SPJ1

Lebensraum, which is German for "living space," was a concept that played a key role in Nazi Germany's territorial expansion and foreign policy in the years leading up to and during World War II.

The notion of Lebensraum was based on the belief that the Germans were a superior race that required more living space to feed their rising population and gain economic and political domination in Europe.

In Hitler's mind, this meant extending Germany's borders eastward into "inferior" Slavic territories. Hitler felt that by taking these regions, Germany would get access to the resources it required to attain economic and military self-sufficiency.

The Nazi regime also sought to establish a "new order" in Europe, with Germans at the top of a racial hierarchy and the rest of the world serving as subordinate or slave populations.

For such more question on Nazi Germany:

https://brainly.com/question/21827785

#SPJ11

Answer:

false

true

false

true

false

Explanation:

i think...

Answer: conservative political view

Explanation:

In the late nineteenth century, the largest ethnic group in the western mining district of the United States was the Chinese.

Chinese immigrants came to the western United States in large numbers during the mid-to-late nineteenth century to work in industries such as mining, railroad construction, and agriculture.In the mining districts of the American West, Chinese laborers played a significant role in extracting gold, silver, and other valuable minerals from the earth. They were often employed in the most dangerous and difficult aspects of mining work, such as tunneling, blasting, and hauling heavy loads. Chinese miners also established their own communities within mining towns, often living and working in segregated areas of the town.The Chinese faced significant discrimination and prejudice in the western United States during this period, including violent attacks and legal restrictions on their rights and opportunities. Despite these challenges, Chinese immigrants continued to play a crucial role in the development of the American West, contributing their labor, skills, and cultural traditions to the region.

Learn more about largest here:https://brainly.com/question/22559105

#SPJ11

The call letters for WAJR, a radio station in Morgantown, are said to have been named after a former owner of the station. The statement is True.

The call letters themselves have no specific meaning, but are simply a unique identifier assigned by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to differentiate one station from another.

The former owner of WAJR is not widely known, and it is unclear why the call letters were chosen to honor them.

It is not uncommon for radio stations to have call letters that are either randomly assigned or have a historical significance.

However, for WAJR, it appears that the call letters are simply a nod to the station's past and its former owner, whose identity remains a mystery.

Learn more about FCC at

https://brainly.com/question/15343925

#SPJ11

The differing ideologies of the United States and the Soviet Union, specifically the ideological divide between capitalism and communism, shaped global interactions in the late twentieth century in a number of ways.

This divide led to the Cold War, a period of intense political and economic tension between the two superpowers, which impacted the world in a number of ways. Firstly, the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in a global competition for political and economic influence, which led to a number of proxy wars in various regions of the world. For example, the Vietnam War, the Korean War, and conflicts in Afghanistan, Angola, and Nicaragua were all seen as proxy wars between the two superpowers.

Learn more about “ capitalism and communism, “ visit here;

https://brainly.com/question/12179941

#SPJ4

Question:

How did the differing ideologies of the United States and the Soviet Union impact global interactions in the late twentieth century?

Answer: The United States promoted democracy, capitalism, and individual freedom, while the Soviet Union promoted communism, state control of the economy, and collective equality.These conflicting ideologies contributed to the emergence of the Cold War, which was characterized by political tension, military rivalry, and ideological competition between the two superpowers and their respective allies.The Cold War had global implications, as the United States and the Soviet Union competed for influence in various regions of the world through proxy wars, alliances, and aid programs.The fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 marked the end of the Cold War and a shift in global power dynamics, as the United States emerged as the sole superpower and global leader of the capitalist democratic system.

Explanation: This information can be found in textbooks, or online, using trusted sources such as, .org, .edu, etc.

Answer:

Hero

Explanation:

Answer:

Absolute monarchs became common during the Early Modern Era for several reasons, including:

1. Reactions to the instability caused by the religious wars and rebellions of the previous period: In an effort to maintain order and stability, many rulers began consolidating their power and reducing the power of other groups, including the nobility and the church.

2. Economic and commercial considerations: Advances in trade and commerce during the Early Modern Era led to the growth of wealthy merchant classes, who often exerted significant political influence. Absolute monarchs were able to more effectively manage these economic interests and promote mercantilist policies that benefited their kingdoms.

3. Military considerations: The rise of standing armies and the development of modern warfare made centralized military command and control increasingly important. Absolute monarchs were able to more effectively control and direct their armies, something that was more difficult under more decentralized systems of government.

4. Intellectual and cultural trends: Many absolutist rulers believed in the divine right of kings and a strict interpretation of traditional social hierarchies. These beliefs were supported by key intellectuals of the time and reinforced through the arts and literature.

Overall, absolute monarchs became common during the Early Modern Era as a response to political, economic, military, and cultural changes that were occurring during this period.

The first Triumvirate was a political alliance in ancient Rome consisting of Julius Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus. Despite their initial cooperation, discord developed between the members for several reasons.

One major factor was their competing ambitions and egos. Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus were all powerful and ambitious men who were vying for political power and influence in Rome. As their alliance grew stronger, so did their individual ambitions, leading to conflicts and disagreements over various issues.

Another factor was their diverging interests and priorities. While Caesar was primarily focused on expanding Rome's territory and conquering new lands, Pompey and Crassus were more concerned with consolidating their wealth and power at home. This led to tensions and disagreements over how to allocate resources and priorities.

Furthermore, personal animosity also played a role in the Triumvirate's dissolution. Pompey and Crassus resented Caesar's growing influence and popularity, while Caesar felt that Pompey and Crassus were not supporting him sufficiently.

Ultimately, the Triumvirate broke down when Crassus died in battle, and Pompey and Caesar turned against each other in a bitter struggle for power that ultimately led to Caesar's rise to dictatorship and Pompey's defeat and death.

Learn more about Triumvirate  here:

https://brainly.com/question/19800196

#SPJ11

The collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization can be attributed to climate change and its subsequent impact on monsoon patterns. This environmental event disrupted agriculture, water resources, trade, and communication within the civilization, ultimately leading to its decline.

The environmental event that occurred around the same time as the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization was climate change, specifically a significant shift in monsoon patterns. This change led to a decrease in rainfall, which in turn caused severe droughts and reduced the availability of water resources. The Indus Valley Civilization, which thrived between 2600 and 1900 BCE, was highly dependent on the predictable monsoon rains for agriculture and sustenance. As the climate shifted, the monsoon patterns became erratic and less reliable. This impacted crop yields and the civilization's food supply, ultimately contributing to its decline. Moreover, the drying up of the rivers, especially the Saraswati River, led to a decrease in trade and communication among various settlements in the region. The reduced water supply also contributed to the decline of urban centers, forcing people to abandon their cities and move to smaller, rural settlements.

Learn more about Indus Valley Civilization here

https://brainly.com/question/2263593

#SPJ11

Read a free sample of Bob Woodward's and Carl Bernstein's book All the President's Men. On the internet, iPad, iPhone, and Android, read millions of eBooks and audiobooks.

Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, two of the reporters who looked into the June 1972 break-in at the Watergate Office Building and the ensuing political scandal for The Washington Post, wrote the nonfiction book All the President's Men in 1974.

They exemplified the ability of journalists to make people answerable for their actions. They also showed how important journalistic freedom is. Would have happened if the Post hadn't run this piece is impossible to know. The governing class would still be in power.

To know more about All the President's Men visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29228757

#SPJ1