Assuming that the surface of the lake is flat and horizontal, we can use Snell's law to relate the angle of incidence of the sunlight in air to the angle of refraction in water:
[tex]n_air sin(θ_air) = n_water sin(θ_water)[/tex]
where n_air and n_water are the refractive indices of air and water, respectively, and θ_air and θ_water are the angles of incidence and refraction, respectively, with respect to the normal to the surface of the lake.
Since the angle of refraction in water is 90 degrees (the light is entering along the surface of the water), we have:
[tex]n_air sin(θ_air) = n_water sin(90°) = n_water[/tex]
The refractive index of air is very close to 1, while the refractive index of water is about 1.33. Substituting these values and solving for θ_air, we get:
[tex]sin(θ_air) = n_water/n_air = 1.33/1\\θ_air = sin^(-1)(1.33/1) = 53.11°[/tex]
Therefore, the angle that the sun's rays in air make with the vertical is approximately 53.11 degrees.
learn more abouT interference pattern here:
https://brainly.com/question/30217637
#SPJ4
how much work does the charge escalator do to move 2.10 μc of charge from the negative terminal to the positive terminal of a 3.50 v battery?
The amount of work the charge escalator do to move 2.10 μc of charge from the negative terminal to the positive terminal of a 3.50 v battery is approximately 7.35 × 10⁻⁶ J.
To calculate the work done by the charge escalator in moving 2.10 μC of charge across a 3.50 V battery, you can use the formula:
Work = Charge × Voltage
In this case, the charge (Q) is 2.10 μC (microcoulombs) and the voltage (V) is 3.50 V. First, convert the charge to coulombs:
2.10 μC = 2.10 × 10⁻⁶ C
Now, plug the values into the formula:
Work = (2.10 × 10⁻⁶ C) × (3.50 V)
Work ≈ 7.35 × 10⁻⁶ J (joules)
The charge escalator does approximately 7.35 × 10⁻⁶ J of work to move the 2.10 μC charge from the negative to the positive terminal of the 3.50 V battery.
Learn more about work done here: https://brainly.com/question/8119756
#SPJ11
A 6.6 Kg rock breaks loose from the edge of a cliff that is 44.5 m above the surface of a lake.
A. How much GPE does the rock have initially?
B. How much GPE and KE will it have when it is halfway down?
C. How fast will it be going when it is halfway down?
(A)Gravitational potential energy GPE does the rock have initially 2674.92 Joules,(B) As the rock is halfway down, it has lost its entire GPE and converted it into KE. So, the KE will be equal to the GPE at this point i.e.1337.96J (C).The rock will be traveling at a speed of approximately 20.15 m/s when it is halfway down.
(A) The gravitational potential energy (GPE) of the rock initially can be calculated using the formula:
GPE = mgh
where:
m = mass of the rock = 6.6 kg
g = acceleration due to gravity = 9.8 m/s²
h = height of the cliff = 44.5 m
Plugging in the values:
GPE = 6.6 kg × 9.8 m/s² × 44.5 m = 2,674.92 J (Joules)
So, the rock initially has 2,674.92 Joules of gravitational potential energy.
(B) When the rock is halfway down, its height would be half of the original height, i.e., h/2 = 44.5 m / 2 = 22.25 m.
The gravitational potential energy (GPE) of the rock when it is halfway down can be calculated using the formula mentioned above:
GPE = mgh
where:
m = mass of the rock = 6.6 kg
g = acceleration due to gravity = 9.8 m/s²
h = height when halfway down = 22.25 m
Plugging in the values:
GPE = 6.6 kg × 9.8 m/s² × 22.25 m = 1,337.96 J (Joules)
The kinetic energy (KE) of the rock when it is halfway down can be calculated using the formula:
KE = (1/2)mv²
where:
m = mass of the rock = 6.6 kg
v = velocity of the rock
As the rock is halfway down, it is lost, its entire GPE and converted it into KE. So, the KE is equal to the GPE at this point.
KE = 1,337.96 J (Joules)
(C) To calculate the velocity (v) of the rock when it is halfway down, we can equate the KE to the formula for kinetic energy:
KE = (1/2)mv²
Plugging in the values:
1,337.96 J = (1/2) ×6.6 kg × v²
v² = (2 × 1,337.96 J) / 6.6 kg
v² = 406.32 m/s
v = √(406.32 m/s) = 20.15 m/s
So, the rock is traveling at a speed of approximately 20.15 m/s when it is halfway down.
To know more about GPE
https://brainly.com/question/17193232
#SPJ1
compute the density for nickel at 500°c, given that its room-temperature density is 8.902 g/cm3 . assume that the volume coefficient of thermal expansion, αv, is equal to 3αl.
The density for a nickel at 500° C, given that its room-temperature density is 8.902 g/cm³, is 8.9 g/cm³.
To compute the density of nickel at 500°C, we need to use the formula:
[tex]\rho = \rho_0 / (1 + \alpha_v (T - T_0))[/tex]
where ρ₀ is the room-temperature density of nickel (8.902 g/cm³), [tex]\alpha_v[/tex] is the volume coefficient of thermal expansion (assumed to be [tex]3\alpha_l[/tex]), T is the temperature in Kelvin (773.15 K), and T₀ is the room-temperature in Kelvin (293.15 K).
Substituting these values into the formula, we get:
ρ = 8.902 g/cm³ / (1 + [tex]3\alpha_l[/tex] (773.15 K - 293.15 K))
Since we don't know the linear coefficient of thermal expansion, [tex]\alpha_l[/tex], we can't compute the density of nickel at 500°C exactly.
However, we can estimate it using the fact that for most materials, the volume coefficient of thermal expansion is roughly three times the linear coefficient of thermal expansion.
Therefore, we can assume that [tex]\alpha_v = 3\alpha_l[/tex], and substitute this into the formula:
ρ = 8.902 g/cm³ / (1 + [tex]3\alpha_l[/tex] (773.15 K - 293.15 K))
ρ ≈ 8.902 g/cm³ / (1 + [tex]9\alpha_l[/tex] (°C))
Assuming that [tex]\alpha_l[/tex] is roughly constant over this temperature range, we can use the value for [tex]\alpha_l[/tex] at room temperature (which is readily available) to estimate its value at 500°C.
For nickel, [tex]\alpha_l[/tex] at room temperature is about 13.4 × 10⁻⁶ °C.
Substituting this value into the formula, we get:
ρ ≈ 8.902 g/cm³ / (1 + 9 × 13.4 × 10⁻⁶ (°C))
ρ ≈ 8.9 g/cm³
Therefore, the estimated density of nickel at 500°C is approximately 8.9 g/cm³.
Learn more about density:
https://brainly.com/question/1354972
#SPJ11
if a wheel is turning at 3.0 rad/s, the time it takes to complete one revolution is about:
If a wheel is turning at 3.0 rad/s, the time it takes to complete one revolution is about 2π / 3.0 ≈ 2.094 seconds.
To determine the time it takes for a wheel to complete one revolution at a speed of 3.0 rad/s, you can follow these steps,
1. Recall that one revolution corresponds to an angle of 2π radians.
2. Use the formula: time = angle / angular speed.
3. Substitute the given values: time = 2π / 3.0 rad/s.
Therefore, if a wheel is rotating at 3.0 rad/s, one revolution will take approximately 2π / 3.0 ≈ 2.094 seconds.to complete.
Learn more about "time": https://brainly.com/question/17146782
#SPJ11
If a wheel is turning at 3.0 rad/s, the time it takes to complete one revolution is about 2π / 3.0 ≈ 2.094 seconds.
To determine the time it takes for a wheel to complete one revolution at a speed of 3.0 rad/s, you can follow these steps,
1. Recall that one revolution corresponds to an angle of 2π radians.
2. Use the formula: time = angle / angular speed.
3. Substitute the given values: time = 2π / 3.0 rad/s.
Therefore, if a wheel is rotating at 3.0 rad/s, one revolution will take approximately 2π / 3.0 ≈ 2.094 seconds.to complete.
Learn more about "time": https://brainly.com/question/17146782
#SPJ11
The energy of a photon is given as 3.03×10−19 J/atom. The wavelength of the photon is : A. 6.56 nm. B. 65.6 nm. C. 0.656 nm. D. 656 nm
The energy of a photon is given as 3.03×10−19 J/atom. The wavelength of the photon is 656 nm (option D).
The energy of a photon is given by the equation E = hc/λ, where h is Planck's constant (6.626 x 10^-34 J s), c is the speed of light (2.998 x 10^8 m/s), and λ is the wavelength of the photon. To find the wavelength of the photon, we can rearrange the equation to λ = hc/E. Substituting the given energy of the photon (3.03 x 10^-19 J/atom) into the equation gives a wavelength of 656 nm, which is option D in the given choices. Therefore, the correct answer is option D, and we can use the equation E = hc/λ to calculate the wavelength of a photon if we know its energy.
learn more about energy here:
https://brainly.com/question/1932868
#SPJ11
2. a) For spring-mass model x" + 4x' + x = cos(2t), write down the general solution, identify the transient part and the steady periodic part of the solution, and find the amplitude of the steady periodic part.
The general solution for the spring-mass model x'' + 4x' + x = cos(2t) is x(t) = C1e^(-2t)cos(t) + C2e^(-2t)sin(t) + (1/5)cos(2t).
The transient part is C1e^(-2t)cos(t) + C2e^(-2t)sin(t), and the steady periodic part is (1/5)cos(2t). The amplitude of the steady periodic part is 1/5.
To find the general solution, we first solve the homogeneous equation x'' + 4x' + x = 0, which has the complementary function x_c(t) = C1e^(-2t)cos(t) + C2e^(-2t)sin(t).
Next, we find a particular solution for the given inhomogeneous equation by trying x_p(t) = A*cos(2t). Plugging x_p(t) into the equation and solving for A, we get A = 1/5. Thus, x_p(t) = (1/5)cos(2t). Finally, the general solution is the sum of the complementary function and the particular solution: x(t) = x_c(t) + x_p(t).
To know more about homogeneous equation click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30767168#
#SPJ11
The sun's dopplergram shows that our star is rotating as well as properties. True or False?
It is true to say that the sun's dopplergram reveals our star's rotational and other physical characteristics.
What exactly does Doppler effect mean?As a wave source and its observer move in relation to one another, there is a shift in wave frequency known as the Doppler Effect. The finding was made by Christian Johann Doppler, who described it as the rising or falling of starlight based on the relative speed of the star.
Doppler effect: Why is it significant?Doppler effects exist for both light and sound. For instance, to determine how quickly an object is moving away from us, astronomers frequently measure how much a star or galaxy's light is "stretched" towards the lower frequency, red area of the spectrum.
To know more about rotational visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/12995374
#SPJ1
A mirror moves perpendicular to its plane with speed beta_c. A light ray is incident on the mirror from the "forward" direction (i.e., V_m V_i < 0, where V_m is the mirror's 3-velocity and v_l is the light ray's 3-velocity) with incident angle theta (measured with respect to the mirror's normal vector). Find cos phi, where phi is the angle of reflection. By what factor does the frequency of the light change upon reflection?
The factor by which the frequency of the light changes upon reflection is [tex]f_r / f_i[/tex] = 1
To find cos phi, we need to use the law of reflection, which states that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection. Therefore, cos phi = cos theta.
To find the factor by which the frequency of the light changes upon reflection, we can use the Doppler effect. The Doppler effect is the change in frequency of a wave due to the motion of the source or the observer. In this case, the mirror is the source of the reflected light, and it is moving perpendicular to its plane with speed [tex]beta_c[/tex].
The Doppler formula for light is given by:
[tex]f_r[/tex] = f[tex]_i[/tex] ×[tex](1 + V_m[/tex] [tex]dot V_l / c^2)[/tex]
where [tex]f_i[/tex] is the frequency of the incident light, [tex]f_r[/tex] is the frequency of the reflected light, [tex]V_m[/tex] is the velocity of the mirror, [tex]V_l[/tex] is the velocity of the light, and c is the speed of light.
Since the mirror is moving perpendicular to its plane, its velocity vector is perpendicular to the incident light ray, so [tex]V_m[/tex] [tex]dotV_l[/tex] = 0.
Therefore, the factor by which the frequency of the light changes upon reflection is: [tex]f_r / f_i[/tex] = 1
This means that the frequency of the light does not change upon reflection.
To know more about Reflection refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/29842530
#SPJ11
For an atomic gas with an atom density of N=1021m*, due to a resonance of the bound electrons (one bound electron per atom), the relative permittivity of the atomic gas can be described by the Lorentz model. If the static relative permittivity is Est=9, and the high- frequency relative permittivity is Eo=6.
Calculate the resonant angular frequency w, of the bound electrons.
The resonant angular frequency of the bound electrons is approximately 3.32 x 10¹⁵ rad/s.
The resonant angular frequency of the bound electrons can be calculated using the Lorentz model formula:
w = (Ne²/mεo) * [(Est - Eo)/(Est + 2Eo)]
where N is the atom density, e is the electron charge, m is the electron mass, εo is the permittivity of free space, Est is the static relative permittivity, and Eo is the high-frequency relative permittivity.
Substituting the given values:
w = (10²¹ * (1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹)²/(9.1 x 10⁻³¹* 8.85 x 10⁻¹²)) * [(9-6)/(9+2*6)]
w ≈ 3.32 x 10¹⁵rad/s
To know more about relative permittivity click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29288724#
#SPJ11
A cook plugs a 500 W crockpot and a 1000 W kettle into a 240 V power supply, all operating on direct current. When we compare the two, we find that:1) Icrockpot < Ikettle and Rcrockpot < Rkettle.2) Icrockpot < Ikettle and Rcrockpot > Rkettle.3) Icrockpot = Ikettle and Rcrockpot = Rkettle.4) Icrockpot > Ikettle and Rcrockpot < Rkettle.5) Icrockpot > Ikettle and Rcrockpot > Rkettle.
After comparing the current (I) and resistance (R) of the crockpot and kettle, 2) Icrockpot < Ikettle and Rcrockpot > Rkettle.
We can use the formula: Power (P) = Voltage (V) × Current (I)
For the crockpot,
500 W = 240 V × Icrockpot
Icrockpot = 500 W / 240 V = 2.08 A
For the kettle,
1000 W = 240 V × Ikettle
Ikettle = 1000 W / 240 V = 4.17 A
Since 2.08 A < 4.17 A, we know Icrockpot < Ikettle.
Next, let's use Ohm's Law to find resistance: Voltage (V) = Current (I) × Resistance (R)
For the crockpot,
240 V = 2.08 A × Rcrockpot
Rcrockpot = 240 V / 2.08 A ≈ 115.38 Ω
For the kettle,
240 V = 4.17 A × Rkettle
Rkettle = 240 V / 4.17 A ≈ 57.55 Ω
Since 115.38 Ω > 57.55 Ω, we know Rcrockpot > Rkettle.
So, the correct answer is, 2) Icrockpot < Ikettle and Rcrockpot > Rkettle.
Learn more about "current": https://brainly.com/question/24858512
#SPJ11
After comparing the current (I) and resistance (R) of the crockpot and kettle, 2) Icrockpot < Ikettle and Rcrockpot > Rkettle.
We can use the formula: Power (P) = Voltage (V) × Current (I)
For the crockpot,
500 W = 240 V × Icrockpot
Icrockpot = 500 W / 240 V = 2.08 A
For the kettle,
1000 W = 240 V × Ikettle
Ikettle = 1000 W / 240 V = 4.17 A
Since 2.08 A < 4.17 A, we know Icrockpot < Ikettle.
Next, let's use Ohm's Law to find resistance: Voltage (V) = Current (I) × Resistance (R)
For the crockpot,
240 V = 2.08 A × Rcrockpot
Rcrockpot = 240 V / 2.08 A ≈ 115.38 Ω
For the kettle,
240 V = 4.17 A × Rkettle
Rkettle = 240 V / 4.17 A ≈ 57.55 Ω
Since 115.38 Ω > 57.55 Ω, we know Rcrockpot > Rkettle.
So, the correct answer is, 2) Icrockpot < Ikettle and Rcrockpot > Rkettle.
Learn more about "current": https://brainly.com/question/24858512
#SPJ11
. which law of thermodynamics requires the work output of the engine to equal the difference in the quantities of heat taken in and released by the engine? explain.
The second law of thermodynamics requires the work output of the engine to equal the difference in the quantities of heat taken in and released by the engine.
This law states that heat cannot flow from a colder body to a hotter body without the input of work. In the case of an engine, heat is taken in from the hot source, and some of that heat is converted into work output. The remaining heat is released to the cold source. The amount of work output must be equal to the difference in the quantities of heat taken in and released, according to the second law of thermodynamics. This is because the total amount of energy in a system is conserved, and energy cannot be created or destroyed. Therefore, the work output of the engine must balance the energy input and output in order to satisfy the laws of thermodynamics.
To learn more about work output https://brainly.com/question/30899925
#SPJ11
A 5.4 g lead bullet moving at 294 m/s strikes a steel plate and stops. If all its kinetic energy is converted to ther- mal energy and none leaves the bullet, what is its temperature change? Assume the specific heat of lead is 128 J/kg.° C. Answer in units of °C.
The temperature change of the bullet is 122.92 °C.
What do you understand by kinetic energy?Kinetic energy is the energy possessed by a moving object by virtue of its motion.
The kinetic energy (KE) of the bullet is given by:
KE = 1/2 * m * v^2
where m is the mass of the bullet and v is its velocity.
Substituting the given values, we get:
KE = 1/2 * 0.0054 kg * (294 m/s)^2
KE = 112.19 J
All this kinetic energy is converted to thermal energy, which can be expressed as:
Q = m * c * ΔT
where Q is the thermal energy, m is the mass of the bullet, c is the specific heat capacity of lead, and ΔT is the change in temperature.
Substituting the given values and solving for ΔT, we get:
ΔT = Q / (m * c)
ΔT = 112.19 J / (0.0054 kg * 128 J/kg.°C)
ΔT = 122.92 °C
Therefore, the temperature change of the bullet is 122.92 °C.
Learn more about energy here:
https://brainly.com/question/1932868
#SPJ1
How much work must be done to accelerate a baton from rest to an angular speed of 8.0 rad/s about its center? Consider the baton to be a uniform rod of length 0.84 m and mass 0.64 kg.
The work required to accelerate the baton to an angular speed of 8.0 rad/s is 0.47 J.
The moment of inertia of the baton about its center is (1/12)mL^2 = 0.004 M^2 kg, where m is the mass and L is the length of the baton. The kinetic energy of the baton is (1/2)Iomega^2, where omega is the angular speed. Thus, the work done is the difference in kinetic energy between the final and initial states, which is (1/2)Iomega^2 - 0. The work required to accelerate the baton to an angular speed of 8.0 rad/s is 0.47 J. The work done is 0.47 J, which is the energy required to give the baton an angular speed of 8.0 rad/s about its center.
learn more about accelerate here:
https://brainly.com/question/12550364
#SPJ11
A 76 kg bike racer climbs a 1500-m-long section of road that has a slope of 4.3 ∘ .
Part A
By how much does his gravitational potential energy change during this climb?
The gravitational potential energy of the bike racer after climbing a 1500 m long road at 4.3 degrees is 83,851.7 Joules.
To calculate the change in gravitational potential energy during the climb, we can use the formula:
Gravitational Potential Energy (GPE) = m * g * h
Where:
m = mass (76 kg)
g = gravitational acceleration (approximately 9.81 m/s²)
h = vertical height gained
First, we need to find the vertical height gained (h). We can use trigonometry to do this. Since we have the length of the road (1500 m) and the slope (4.3°), we can find the height using the sine function:
sin(slope) = height / length
height = sin(4.3°) * 1500 m
Now, let's calculate the height:
height = 0.0749 * 1500
height = 112.46 m
Now that we have the height, we can calculate the change in gravitational potential energy:
GPE = 76 kg * 9.81 m/s² * 112.46 m
GPE = 83851.7 J (Joules)
The gravitational potential energy changes by 83,851.7 Joules during the climb.
Learn more about gravitational potential energy:
https://brainly.com/question/15896499
#SPJ11
The gravitational potential energy of the bike racer after climbing a 1500 m long road at 4.3 degrees is 83,851.7 Joules.
To calculate the change in gravitational potential energy during the climb, we can use the formula:
Gravitational Potential Energy (GPE) = m * g * h
Where:
m = mass (76 kg)
g = gravitational acceleration (approximately 9.81 m/s²)
h = vertical height gained
First, we need to find the vertical height gained (h). We can use trigonometry to do this. Since we have the length of the road (1500 m) and the slope (4.3°), we can find the height using the sine function:
sin(slope) = height / length
height = sin(4.3°) * 1500 m
Now, let's calculate the height:
height = 0.0749 * 1500
height = 112.46 m
Now that we have the height, we can calculate the change in gravitational potential energy:
GPE = 76 kg * 9.81 m/s² * 112.46 m
GPE = 83851.7 J (Joules)
The gravitational potential energy changes by 83,851.7 Joules during the climb.
Learn more about gravitational potential energy:
https://brainly.com/question/15896499
#SPJ11
The sweeping second hand on your wall clock is 16 cm long. Assume the second hand moves smoothly.A) What is the rotational speed of the second hand? Express your answer in radians per second to two significant figures.B) Find the translational speed of the tip of the second hand. Express your answer with the appropriate units.C) Find the rotational acceleration of the second hand. Express your answer in radians per second squared.
In a wall clock if the length of the second hand is 16 cm then:
(A) The rotational speed of the second hand is 0.105 radians/second.
(B) The translation speed of the tip is 0.0168 meters/second.
(C) The rotational acceleration of the second hand is 0 radians/second².
A) To find the rotational speed of the second hand, we need to know how much it rotates in one second. Since the second hand completes a full rotation in 60 seconds, its rotational speed (ω) can be calculated using the formula:
ω = (total rotation) / (time taken)
A full rotation is 2π radians, so the rotational speed is:
ω = (2π radians) / (60 seconds)
ω = π/30 radians/second = 0.105 radians/second (to two significant figures)
B) To find the translational speed (v) of the tip of the second hand, we can use the formula:
v = ω * r
where ω is the rotational speed, and r is the length of the second hand. In this case, r = 16 cm = 0.16 meters. So, the translational speed is:
v = (0.105 radians/second) * (0.16 meters)
v = 0.0168 meters/second
C) Since the second-hand moves smoothly, its rotational acceleration (α) is 0. This means that there is no change in the rotational speed over time. In other words, the second hand rotates at a constant rate:
α = 0 radians/second²
Learn more about rotational acceleration:
https://brainly.com/question/29342095
#SPJ11
discuss the factors determining the induced emf in a closed loop of wire.
The factors determining the induced emf in a closed loop of wire are: 1. Magnetic field strength (B), 2. Area of the loop (A), 3. Rate of change of magnetic flux (dΦ/dt), and 4. the relative orientation between the magnetic field and the loop.
The factors determining the induced emf in a closed loop of wire can be further explained as follows:
1. Magnetic field strength (B): The stronger the magnetic field, the higher the induced emf.
2. Area of the loop (A): A larger loop area leads to a greater induced emf.
3. Rate of change of magnetic flux (dΦ/dt): The faster the magnetic flux changes through the loop, the higher the induced emf.
4. Relative orientation between the magnetic field and the loop: When the magnetic field lines are perpendicular to the loop, the induced emf is maximized.
To calculate the induced emf, we can use Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, which states:
Induced emf = - dΦ/dt
where Φ represents the magnetic flux through the loop (Φ = B * A * cosθ), and θ is the angle between the magnetic field lines and the normal to the loop. The negative sign indicates that the induced emf opposes the change in magnetic flux, as described by Lenz's law.
Learn more about emf: https://brainly.com/question/17329842
#SPJ11
An air-conditioner with an average cop of 3.5 consumes 16 kwh of electricity during a certain day. what is the amount of heat removed by this air-conditioner that day?
The amount of heat removed by the air-conditioner with a COP of 3.5 and consuming 16 kWh of electricity in a day is 56 kWh.
To find the heat removed, we use the formula: Heat Removed (Q) = COP x Electricity Consumed (E). The COP (Coefficient of Performance) is the ratio of the heat removed to the electricity consumed. In this case, the COP is 3.5, and the air-conditioner consumes 16 kWh of electricity during the day. Using the formula, we get:
Q = COP x E
Q = 3.5 x 16 kWh
Q = 56 kWh
So, the air-conditioner removes 56 kWh of heat during that day.
To know more about Coefficient of Performance click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/31460559#
#SPJ11
Suppose two ice hockey pucks with the same mass collide on a level, frozen pond. There is approximately no friction between the pucks and the surface.what is the change in the puck's momentum fromt t=0ms to t=100ms?
The change in momentum of puck is, -0.06 kg m/s.
Momentum is a vector quantity, meaning it has both magnitude and direction. It is conserved in a closed system, meaning that the total momentum of the system remains constant unless acted upon by an external force.
From the graph provided, the change in the puck's momentum from t=0ms to t=100ms can be calculated by finding the difference between the momentum at those two times.
The momentum at t=0ms is approximately 0.035 kg m/s, and the momentum at t=100ms is approximately -0.025 kg m/s. Therefore, the change in the puck's momentum is:
Change in momentum = (-0.025 kg m/s) - (0.035 kg m/s) = -0.06 kg m/s
To know more about momentum, here
brainly.com/question/30487676
#SPJ4
--The complete question is, Two ice hockey pucks with the same mass collide on a level, frozen pond. The first puck is initially at rest, and the second puck approaches it with a velocity of 10 m/s. The collision is approximately elastic, and there is almost no friction between the pucks and the surface. What is the change in the puck's momentum from t=0 ms to t=100 ms after the collision?--
what is the mass of a mallard duck whose speed is 8.2 m/s and whose momentum has a magnitude of 10 kg⋅m/s ?
The mass of the mallard duck whose speed is 8.2 and has a momentum of 10 kg.m/s is 1.22 kg.
To find the mass of the mallard duck, we will use the formula for momentum:
Momentum = Mass × Velocity
In this case, we are given the momentum (10 kg⋅m/s) and the velocity (8.2 m/s) and need to find the mass. We can rearrange the formula to solve for mass:
Mass = Momentum ÷ Velocity
Now, we can plug in the given values:
Mass = (10 kg⋅m/s) ÷ (8.2 m/s)
Mass = 1.22 kg
So, the mass of the mallard duck is approximately 1.22 kg.
Learn more about momentum:
https://brainly.com/question/18798405
#SPJ11
when applying newton's 2nd law to an object on an inclined plane, we choose the coordinate axes parallel and perpendicular to the plane because?
it makes the friction force negligible
it means we do not have to split the gravitational force into two components
it makes acceleration along one axis equal to zero
it makes all the forces sum to zero
all of the above
When applying Newton's 2nd law to an object on an inclined plane, we choose the coordinate axes parallel and perpendicular to the plane because it makes the gravitational force split into two components, one parallel and one perpendicular to the plane.
This allows us to consider the perpendicular component of the gravitational force separately from the applied force, and to calculate the net force along the parallel axis.
Choosing this coordinate system does not make the friction force negligible, nor does it make all the forces sum to zero. Additionally, it does not necessarily make acceleration along one axis equal to zero. However, applying Newton's 2nd law to an object on an inclined plane, we choose the coordinate axes parallel and perpendicular to the plane because it makes the gravitational force split into two components. Therefore, the correct option is none of the above.
Learn more about Newton: https://brainly.com/question/28171613
#SPJ11
what is the relationship between work and kinetic energy for a horizontal force and displacement? how might this change if the displacement is not perpendicular to the force of gravity?
According to the work-energy theorem, the net work done on an object equals its change in kinetic energy. In the case of a horizontal force and displacement, the work done by the force is equal to the change in the kinetic energy of the object.
Mathematically, the work done by a constant horizontal force F over a displacement d is given by:
W = Fd cos(theta)
where theta is the angle between the force vector and the displacement vector. If the force is horizontal, then theta is 0 degrees, and the cosine of 0 is 1, so the equation simplifies to:
W = Fd
The change in kinetic energy of an object of mass m moving with a velocity v is given by:
ΔK = 1/2 mv^2 - 1/2 mv0^2
where v0 is the initial velocity of the object. If the object starts from rest, then v0 is 0, and the equation simplifies to:
ΔK = 1/2 mv^2
Thus, we can equate the work done by the force to the change in kinetic energy of the object:
W = ΔK
Fd = 1/2 mv^2
This relationship shows that the work done by a horizontal force over a displacement is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the object. If the force and displacement are not perpendicular to the force of gravity, then the gravitational potential energy of the object will also change. In this case, the work done by the force will equal the change in both the kinetic energy and the gravitational potential energy of the object:
W = ΔK + ΔU
where ΔU is the change in gravitational potential energy. The total work done by the force will be the sum of the work done on the object to change its kinetic energy and the work done to change its gravitational potential energy.
*IG:whis.sama_ent
a 2.02-kg particle has a velocity (1.99 î − 2.96 ĵ) m/s, and a 2.98-kg particle has a velocity (1.10 î 5.98 ĵ) m/s. (a) find the velocity of the center of mass.
The velocity of the center of mass is (0.80 î + 3.38 ĵ) m/s.
The velocity of the center of mass of a system of particles can be calculated using the formula:
vcm = (m1v1 + m2v2 + ... + mn*vn) / (m1 + m2 + ... + mn)
where m1, m2, ..., mn are the masses of the particles and v1, v2, ..., vn are their velocities.
In this case, we have two particles with masses of 2.02 kg and 2.98 kg, and velocities of (1.99 î − 2.96 ĵ) m/s and (1.10 î + 5.98 ĵ) m/s, respectively. We can calculate the velocity of the center of mass as follows:
vcm = (m1v1 + m2v2) / (m1 + m2)
where m1 = 2.02 kg, m2 = 2.98 kg, v1 = (1.99 î − 2.96 ĵ) m/s, and v2 = (1.10 î + 5.98 ĵ) m/s.
Substituting the values, we get:
vcm = [(2.02 kg)(1.99 î − 2.96 ĵ) m/s + (2.98 kg)(1.10 î + 5.98 ĵ) m/s] / (2.02 kg + 2.98 kg)
Simplifying the expression, we get:
vcm = [(4.00 î + 16.92 ĵ) kg*m/s] / (5.00 kg)
vcm = (0.80 î + 3.38 ĵ) m/s
learn more about centre of mass here:
https://brainly.com/question/28996108
#SPJ11
block a has a mass of 1.00 kg. when block b has fallen through a height h = 2.00 m, its speed is v = 3.00 m/s. assuming that no friction is acting on block a, what is the mass of block b?
The mass of block b is 2.94 kg, calculated using conservation of energy.
How to find the mass of block b?We can use conservation of energy to solve this problem. The potential energy lost by block b as it falls through height h is equal to the kinetic energy gained by it at the bottom. We can write this as:
[tex]m_b_g_h[/tex] = (1/2)[tex]m_b_v[/tex]²
where [tex]m_b[/tex] is the mass of block b, g is the acceleration due to gravity, h is the height it falls through, and v is its speed at the bottom.
Solving for [tex]m_b[/tex], we get:
[tex]m_b[/tex] = 2gh/[tex]v^2[/tex]
Substituting the given values, we get:
[tex]m_b[/tex] = 29.812/ = 2.94 kg
Therefore, the mass of block b is approximately 2.94 kg.
Learn more about Conservation of energy
brainly.com/question/2137260
#SPJ11
A 60.0 kg person bends his knees and then jumps straight up. After his feet leave the floor, his motion is unaffected by air resistance, and his center of mass rises by a maximum of 14.9 cm. Model the floor as completely solid and motionless.
(a) Does the floor impart impulse to the person?
(b) Does the floor do work on the person?
(c) With what momentum does the person leave the floor?
(d) Does it make sense to say that this momentum came from the floor? Explain your answer.
(e) With what kinetic energy does the person leave the floor?
(f) Does it make sense to say that this energy came from the floor? Explain your answer.
(A) The individual receives an impulse from the ground because an impulse is equal to a change in momentum, and when a person jumps up from the ground, their momentum changes.
(b) The individual is affected by the floor, yes. When a force works over a distance, work is produced; in this instance, the floor pushes the person upward over a distance equal to the height of the leap.
(C) The equation p = mv, where m is the person's mass and v is their forward velocity, determines the momentum of the subject prior to jumping. The person's initial momentum was zero since they were at rest when they jumped.
The momentum of the person after they leave the floor is also given by p = mv, where m is the mass of the person and v is their velocity after jumping. We can use conservation of energy to find their velocity after jumping:
[tex]mgh = (1/2)mv^2[/tex]
Here g is the acceleration due to gravity, h is the height that the person jumps, and the factor of 1/2 comes from the fact that the person starts from rest. Solving for v, we get:
v = [tex]\sqrt{(2gh)}[/tex]
v = [tex]\sqrt{(2 * 9.8 * 0.149 m)}[/tex] ≈ 1.94 m/s
So the momentum of the person after leaving the floor is:
p = mv = (60.0 kg)(1.94 m/s) ≈ 116.4 kg m/s
(d) No, it doesn't make sense to say that the momentum came from the floor. Momentum is always conserved, so the person's momentum after jumping must be equal to their momentum before jumping. In this case, the person's momentum before jumping was zero.
(e) The kinetic energy of the person after leaving the floor is given by:
KE = [tex](1/2)mv^2[/tex], where m is the mass of the person and v is their velocity after jumping. Plugging in the given values, we get:
KE = [tex](1/2)(60.0 kg)(1.94 m/s)^2[/tex] ≈ 354 J
(f) No, it doesn't make sense to say that the energy came from the floor. Energy is always conserved, so the person's kinetic energy after jumping must be equal to the work done on them by external forces. In this case, the only external force doing work on the person is gravity.
Learn more about impulse visit: brainly.com/question/30395939
#SPJ4
Show that the radial wave function R₂1 for n = 2 and = 1 is normalized. (Use the following as necessary: r and a.)R =SOR&R=To normalize, we integrate over all r space.[infinity]. [infinity]∫ 2R*R dr=1/24a0⁵ ∫. (. )dr0. 0=1/24a0⁵(. )=so the wave function R21 was normalized.
Demonstrate the normalisation of the radial wave function R21 for n = 2 and l = 1. (If necessary, substitute r and a.) R =, so we integrate throughout the entire r space to normalise. The wave function R21 was normalised as a result of the equation r2R*R dr = dr 242, 1" CO 1 = 5 24a.
How can the normalisation of a wave function be demonstrated?A wave function is normalised by simply multiplying it by a constant to make sure that the probability of finding that particle is added up to one.
What does the wave function's normalisation constant mean?The normalisation constant and the equation also refer to the amplitude of the wave function that describes the particle in an infinite potential well For this constant, it is simple to solve for the amplitude after normalising the wave function.
To know more about wave function visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/17484291
#SPJ1
An expensive spotlight is located at the bottom of a gold-plated swimming pool of depth d = 2.10 m (see Figure). Determine the diameter of the circle from which light emerges from the tranquil surface of the pool.
The diameter of the circle from which light emerges from the tranquil surface of the pool is twice the radius, or 2 * R.
What is Light?
Light is a form of electromagnetic radiation that is visible to the human eye. It is a type of energy that travels in the form of waves, and it does not require a medium to propagate, meaning it can travel through a vacuum as well as through transparent substances like air, water, and glass.
The refractive index of gold-plated swimming pool water can be assumed to be approximately equal to the refractive index of water, which is approximately 1.33. The refractive index of air is approximately 1.00.
According to Snell's Law, the relationship between the angles of incidence and refraction for a light ray passing from one medium to another is given by:
n₁ * sin(θ₁) = n₂ * sin(θ₂)
where n₁ and n₂ are the refractive indices of the two media, θ₁ is the angle of incidence, and θ₂ is the angle of refraction.
In this case, the light ray is passing from water (with refractive index n₁ = 1.33) into air (with refractive index n₂ = 1.00). The angle of incidence is the angle between the normal to the surface of the water and the incident light ray, which can be calculated as:
θ₁ = atan(d/R)
where d is the depth of the pool and R is the radius of the circle from which light emerges from the surface of the pool.
The angle of refraction can be calculated as:
θ₂ = asin(n₁/n₂ * sin(θ₁))
Once we have the value of θ₂, we can use basic trigonometry to find the radius R of the circle:
R = d / tan(θ₂)
Learn more about Light from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/104425
#SPJ1
what if? what would be the magnitude and direction of the initial acceleration of an electron moving with velocity 3.08 ✕ 105 m/s into the page at point p?
The initial downward acceleration of the electron relies on the strength of the magnetic field, which is not specified in the issue, and the acceleration's magnitude.
What does a proton weigh?The proton is a stable subatomic particle with a rest mass of 1.67262 1027 kg, or 1,836 times the mass of an electron, and an equivalent positive charge to that of an electron.
What does neutron mass mean?Except for ordinary hydrogen, all atomic nuclei contain neutrons, which are neutral subatomic particles. Its rest mass, which is 1,838,68 times more than the electron's but only slightly higher than the proton's, is 1.67492749804 1027 kg. Electrically, it is not charged.
To know more about magnetic field visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/23096032
#SPJ1
what is the maximum permissible current in a 10 ω, 4 w resistor? what is the maximum voltage that can be applied across the resistor
The maximum permissible current in the resistor is 0.632 A. The maximum voltage that can be applied across the resistor is 6.32 V.
To determine the maximum permissible current in a 10 Ω, 4 W resistor, we can use the formula: I = √(P/R), where I is the current, P is the power, and R is the resistance.
Substituting the values given, we get: I = √(4/10) = 0.632 A. Therefore, the maximum permissible current in the resistor is 0.632 A.
To find the maximum voltage that can be applied across the resistor, we can use Ohm's law: V = IR, where V is the voltage, I is the current, and R is the resistance.
Substituting the values given and using the maximum permissible current found above, we get: V = (0.632 A) x (10 Ω) = 6.32 V. Therefore, the maximum voltage that can be applied across the resistor is 6.32 V.
To know more about voltage, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13521443#
#SPJ11
Using your knowledge of positron emission sort the following statements based on whether they are true or false, True False Answer Bank During positron emission a proton is converted into a ncutron and positron Positron emission releases an electron During positron emission a proton is converted into an electron and positron Positron emission is a type of radioactive decay. Positron emission releases an alpha particle Positron emission releases an isotope that has a mass number equal to the original isotope and an atomic number that is one less than the original isotope.
Statements that are true are:
1. During positron emission, a proton is converted into a neutron and a positron.
2. Positron emission is a type of radioactive decay.
3. Positron emission releases an isotope that has a mass number equal to the original isotope and an atomic number that is one less than the original isotope.
Statements that are false are:
1. Positron emission releases an electron.
2. Positron emission releases an alpha particle.
Positron emission is a type of radioactive decay in which a proton in the nucleus of an atom is converted into a neutron, and a positron is emitted. A positron is a positively charged particle that has the same mass as an electron but has a positive charge instead of a negative charge. Therefore, during positron emission, a proton is converted into a neutron and a positron, which is then emitted from the nucleus.
The statement "Positron emission releases an electron" is false because, during positron emission, a positron is emitted, not an electron. While both positrons and electrons have the same mass, they have opposite charges, and therefore, they behave differently.
The statement "Positron emission releases an alpha particle" is also false because alpha decay is a different type of radioactive decay in which an alpha particle is emitted from the nucleus. An alpha particle is a particle that consists of two protons and two neutrons and has a positive charge.
Finally, the statement "Positron emission releases an isotope that has a mass number equal to the original isotope and an atomic number that is one less than the original isotope" is true. During positron emission, the atomic number of the atom decreases by one because a proton is converted into a neutron. However, the mass number of the atom remains the same because the total number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus remains unchanged.
Learn more about radioactive decay:
https://brainly.com/question/9932896
#SPJ11
Statements that are true are:
1. During positron emission, a proton is converted into a neutron and a positron.
2. Positron emission is a type of radioactive decay.
3. Positron emission releases an isotope that has a mass number equal to the original isotope and an atomic number that is one less than the original isotope.
Statements that are false are:
1. Positron emission releases an electron.
2. Positron emission releases an alpha particle.
Positron emission is a type of radioactive decay in which a proton in the nucleus of an atom is converted into a neutron, and a positron is emitted. A positron is a positively charged particle that has the same mass as an electron but has a positive charge instead of a negative charge. Therefore, during positron emission, a proton is converted into a neutron and a positron, which is then emitted from the nucleus.
The statement "Positron emission releases an electron" is false because, during positron emission, a positron is emitted, not an electron. While both positrons and electrons have the same mass, they have opposite charges, and therefore, they behave differently.
The statement "Positron emission releases an alpha particle" is also false because alpha decay is a different type of radioactive decay in which an alpha particle is emitted from the nucleus. An alpha particle is a particle that consists of two protons and two neutrons and has a positive charge.
Finally, the statement "Positron emission releases an isotope that has a mass number equal to the original isotope and an atomic number that is one less than the original isotope" is true. During positron emission, the atomic number of the atom decreases by one because a proton is converted into a neutron. However, the mass number of the atom remains the same because the total number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus remains unchanged.
Learn more about radioactive decay:
https://brainly.com/question/9932896
#SPJ11
spins with an angular velocity of 540º/s. the distance from his axis of rotation to the center of mass of the 7.26 kg hammer is 2.06 m.a) What is the linear velocity of the hammer head (i.e., the ball in the picture)?b) What is the centripetal acceleration of the hammer head?c) What is the centripetal force created by the hammer head? (Note: we have not talked about centripetal force yet, but use what you know about the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration)
a) The linear velocity of the hammer head is 18.54π m/s.
b) The centripetal acceleration of the hammer head is approximately 533.4 m/s².
c) The centripetal force created by the hammer head is approximately 3871.5 N.
a) To find the linear velocity of the hammer head, we first need to convert the angular velocity from degrees per second to radians per second.
1 radian = 180º/π, so:
Angular velocity = 540º/s * (π/180) = 9π rad/s
Linear velocity (v) = angular velocity (ω) * radius (r)
v = 9π rad/s * 2.06 m = 18.54π m/s
The hammer head's linear velocity is 18.54 m/s.
b) To find the centripetal acceleration (a_c) of the hammer head, we can use the following formula:
a_c = v^2 / r
a_c = (18.54π m/s)^2 / 2.06 m ≈ 533.4 m/s²
The hammer head's centripetal acceleration is roughly 533.4 m/s2.
c) To find the centripetal force (F_c) created by the hammer head, we can use the formula:
F_c = mass (m) * centripetal acceleration (a_c)
F_c = 7.26 kg * 533.4 m/s² ≈ 3871.5 N
The hammer head exerts a centripetal force of about 3871.5 N.
Learn more about "centripetal acceleration": https://brainly.com/question/79801
#SPJ11