Southern politicians justified seceding from the union and creating the confederate states of America by stating that the states had voluntarily joined the Union and the had the right to leave it too.
About confederate states of America
From February 8, 1861, to May 9, 1865, Confederate States of America (CSA), sometimes known as the Confederate States, Confederacy, and simply "the South," was an unrecognised breakaway republic in North America. The Confederacy was made up of American states that had secessionist policies and fought the Union during American Civil War. Dixie, or eleven U.S. states, proclaimed secession and made up the majority of the CSA. They were North Carolina, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and South Carolina. During the occupation by the Union forces, Kentucky and Missouri also declared their secession and had proper representation with in Confederate Congress.
To know more about confederate states of America:
brainly.com/question/14372354
#SPJ4
Lawmakers in new zealand will vote on whether the country should lower the voting age to. ?.
The national voting age in New Zealand will be lowered from 18 to 16, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said on Monday.
She made her declaration shortly after the nation's Supreme Court decided that denying 16 and 17-year-olds the right to vote constituted age discrimination. Although Ardern stated that she personally supports decreasing the age, a 75% supermajority of parliamentarians would need to approve for the move. Even the supporters admit they do not yet have the numbers. The question of lowering the voting age is being debated in a number of nations. Several countries, like Austria, Malta, Brazil, Cuba, and Ecuador, let citizens vote at 16 years old. Sanat Singh, co-director of the Make It 16 campaign in New Zealand, expressed his utter delight at the court's ruling.
learn more about new zealand voting age here:
https://brainly.com/question/26211549
#SPJ4
In the Supreme Court case of _____, the Court struck down Section 7 of the Military Commissions Act, which declared that Guantanamo prisoners could not bring habeas corpus petitions to federal courts to seek their release.
Section 7 of the Military Commissions Act, which prohibited Guantanamo prisoners from filing habeas corpus petitions in federal courts to request their release, was overturned by the Supreme Court in the Marbury v. Madison decision.
In a 2006 decision, what did the Supreme Court rule on military commissions?Without a congressional act, the President is not permitted to establish military commissions. Five officers must make up the board of a military commission rather than a single federal judge.
Which decision of the Supreme Court is most closely related to the exclusionary rule?Weeks v. United States provided the first explanation of the exclusionary rule (1914). The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in that case that the Fourth Amendment's safeguard against unauthorized searches and seizures should be interpreted to prohibit using incriminating evidence that was obtained unlawfully.
To know more about Military Commissions Act visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/6327433
#SPJ4
there is fierce debate over how to spend federal educational funds. as your textbook notes, the current education secretary betsy devos is a strong advocate for ____.
DeVos is well-known for being "a fierce supporter of school vouchers," which would let pupils attend private schools while receiving public funding.
The U.S. Department of Education receives close to $79 billion annually from the federal government for primary and secondary education initiatives.From kindergarten through the twelfth grade, basic education is offered in American public schools. Parents and students receive this for free, but the federal government receives funding from both general taxes and taxes on property owners.Local contributions and state government funding are the two main sources of funding for elementary and secondary education.In light of this, we can say that Betsy Devos, the current secretary of education, is a fervent supporter of school vouchers.
Learn more about federal education funds here: https://brainly.com/question/6270391
#SPJ4
How does mock trial help students? Write 1 paragraph 5 sentences each
Answer:
Mock trial is a great way for students to learn about the legal system and develop their critical thinking and public speaking skills. It allows students to gain an understanding of the court system and the roles of the different participants. It also provides an opportunity for students to practice their argumentation and presentation skills in a safe and supportive environment. Mock trial also helps students to develop their research and analytical skills as they prepare for their cases. Finally, mock trial helps students to develop their confidence and self-esteem as they learn to think on their feet and present their arguments in a persuasive manner.
Explanation:
the___within article i, section 8 of the u.s. constitution authorizes congress to pass laws protecting intellectual property.
The correct answer is the clause 8 within Article I, Section 8 of the US constitution authorizes congress to pass laws protecting intellectual property.
The clause actually bestows two separate powers: the ability to secure for a finite period of time the exclusive right to authors' writings, which serves as the foundation for U.S. copyright law, and the ability to secure for a finite period of time the exclusive right to inventors' discoveries, which serves as the foundation for U.S. patent law.
Trademarks are instead protected under the Commerce Clause because the clause is silent on whether Congress may protect them. Some of the terminology in the clause have dated connotations, which could be misleading to readers today.
For instance, "useful Arts" refers to all knowledge, not only the disciplines of current scientific investigation, and "Sciences" refers to all knowledge, not just the domains of modern scientific study.
To know more about 'intellectual property' related questions
visit- https://brainly.com/question/29452183
#SPJ4
The lawyer who represents the federal government and argues cases before the supreme court is the ________.
The solicitor general chooses which appeals from lower courts should be filed and personally approves each one that is submitted. This attorney represents the federal government before the Supreme Court.
The government's stance in a matter is decided by the solicitor general. The solicitor general (or an assistant) makes the oral arguments before the Court, while the lawyers in his or her office prepare and submit the petitions and briefs. The solicitor general may decide to intervene or make a statement as a third party in other situations when the United States is neither the petitioner nor the respondent. The justices occasionally request the solicitor general to comment on or submit a brief in a matter before granting cert., suggesting their potential interest in placing it on the docket. The justices' refusal to consider a matter may also be suggested by the solicitor general.
learn more about federal government here:
https://brainly.com/question/24049224
#SPJ4
According to Kathleen Dolan, one of the reasons that Congress is less popular than the presidency and the Supreme Court is because...
There are many Congress members while there is only one president and nine Supreme Court members
According to Kathleen Dolan, one of the reasons that Congress is less popular than the presidency and the Supreme Court is because there are many Congress members while there is only one President and nine Supreme Court members.
Because there are divides in many laws, it's difficult to appease everyone, which is why Congress is so unpopular. To understand the rules changes and the power dynamics between the Speaker and committee chairs, read through the six stages of the House of Representatives. Congress is the government branch with the lowest popularity. Some imagine it as the damaged branch that needs to be fixed. But it's also the most crucial.
Learn more on laws
https://brainly.com/question/29553499
#SPJ4
A major reaon for a tractor colliion on public road i that they are much than other car
A major reason for a tractor collision on public road is that they are much slower than other cars.
The speed differential between tractors and vehicles is a significant contributor to agricultural machinery incidents on public roadways. As slow moving farm machinery is approached by drivers at such a rapid rate that they have little time to recognise the danger and take proper action.
Because of this, it is crucial for farm equipment to be clearly marked as travelling considerably slower than normal traffic and to be very visible.
A slow moving vehicle (SMV) symbol serves as the source of this identification. It must be: clearly visible at a distance of 150 metres, centred just on back of the tractor or following equipment, and between 60 cm & 1.8 metres above the road surface. SMV signs need to be kept tidy. Replace any signs that have faded or been destroyed.
To know more about slow moving vehicle:
brainly.com/question/28256674
#SPJ4
Recent court decisions in the united states involving the paternal rights of unwed presumed fathers established that ______.
Recent court decisions in the united states involving the paternal rights of unwed presumed fathers established that All four obligations and rights could apply to an unmarried father, or only some of them.
About Paternal Rights in USA
There is a constitutional amendment known as the Parental Rights Amendment that is being considered. The supporters of the amendment claim that it will protect parents' rights to raise their children as they see fit, free from federal meddling and the restrictions of the UNCRC. The Amendment was initially put forth as the House Joint Resolution 97 during the 110th Congress in July 2008, but still no actions were taken during such Congress. It has been said that the Amendment is a "wedge issue" as well as a component of the cultural wars.
To know more about Congress:
brainly.com/question/4736734
#SPJ4
Why would the media push a non-political narrative that is untrue or misleading?
The reason that the media push a non-political narrative that is untrue or misleading is that:
Some possible reasons include the desire to attract readers or viewers, the desire to influence public opinion, or the desire to advance a particular agenda.Why do media push a non-political narrative?There are a variety of reasons why media organizations might push a non-political narrative that is untrue or misleading.
In some cases, media organizations may be motivated by profit, as sensational headlines or controversial stories can generate more clicks and ad revenue. In other cases, media organizations may be motivated by a desire to shape public opinion or to promote a particular ideology.
Therefore, It is important for readers and viewers to be aware of these potential biases and to critically evaluate the information they consume from the media.
Learn more about media from
https://brainly.com/question/26152499
#SPJ1
Why does leslie gordon think it is a good idea for the government to make the sale of alcohol legal?.
Leslie Gordon believes legalizing the sale of alcohol is a good idea for the government because the tax revenue would raise more than $200,000,000 for critically important needs.
People tend to purchase alcohol on the black market since it is illegal to sell it, which has caused both a financial and a political issue for the government. As a result, Leslie Gordon believe that the government should legalize the sale of alcohol. that it would be wise for the government to legalize alcohol sales.The 18th Amendment was intended to make it illegal to sell and buy alcohol. But its proper execution was a failure.
learn more about sale of alcohol here:
https://brainly.com/question/21599095
#SPJ4
An attorney was employed by the United States Department of Health and Human Services in a regional office located in a tobacco-growing state. A labor contract between the agency and the clerical workers union contained a policy providing for termination of union employees only for certain specified grounds. The attorney, however, was not a member of the union and not covered by such a policy. The attorney was angered by the regional director's refusal to adopt a no-smoking policy for employees and visitors in the office. She posted a notice in the employee cafeteria ridiculing what she called the hypocrisy of an agency promoting health issues and nonsmoking programs while refusing to provide its employees with those same opportunities. The notice prompted a great deal of debate among the employees and was brought to the attention of the regional director, who was very displeased.
Which of the following statements is most accurate regarding the director's right to dismiss the attorney?
A The attorney has a liberty interest in the exercise of her First Amendment rights that entitles her to a hearing to contest the grounds of her dismissal.
B The attorney has a property interest as a public employee that precludes her from being fired without notice and an opportunity to respond.
C The attorney has no right to a hearing because her statements were not an expression of views on public issues.
D The attorney has both a liberty interest and a property interest that entitles her to a pre-termination evidentiary hearing.
The process of generating organizational policies is now more properly referred to as "policy making."
Free corporations should adhere to policy 1, as doing so will provide applicants who belong to underrepresented groups or have disabilities an extra point. Because of this method, Free Corporation won't have to alter its hiring criteria or other factors like technical expertise, personality type, experience, and many others. Therefore, by awarding extra points, they are merely providing this group of individuals a competitive advantage over other individuals, and by doing so, they may gradually instil this group of individuals into the company's culture and performance. The union that represents the workers at the Miracle Medical research company has opted against bargaining with them about the hiring of more personnel because it is their choice and has nothing to do with breaking any local, state, or federal laws.
Learn more about Policy making here:
https://brainly.com/question/29765758
#SPJ4
an oral contract that should be in writing to be enforceable under the statute of frauds may be enforceable if it has been partially performed.
The only writing sufficient to satisfy the Statute of Frauds is a typewritten form signed at the bottom by all parties with the heading Contract at the top.
Under fraud law, a contract to sell a real estate interest must be written off. The exception to this is a partially executed verbal property purchase agreement. Fraud laws regulate six specific types of contracts. A contract that is not governed by law does not have to be in writing to be enforceable.
However, in the case of verbal contracts only if the law requires a written contract, the oral contract will be considered legally void. Oral contracts apply as long as the essential elements of the contract are in place and offer acceptance exchanges of consideration and disagreements on specific terms of the contract. You do not have to agree to non-mandatory terms and conditions to make an oral contract enforceable.
Learn more about An oral contract here:- https://brainly.com/question/9380641
#SPJ4
Public Defenders____.
A.) must be in their first year of practicing
B.) are paid by the government and must be ethically free from government
direction.
C.) must work pro bono
D.) are paid by the government and must disclose all information related to the
case to the prosecution
Answer: B
Explanation:
Answer:
I believe its B
Explanation:
Under the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if a lease does not state a clear expiration date, the lease is regarded as
Answer:
Hello. Under Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if the lease does not specify or make clear an expiration date, the lease will be regarded as: A tenancy from period-to-period.
Explanation:
Question does not ask for an explanation, so one will not be given. Have a nice day user.
in the text of this scenario explain how a structural barrier may challenge amash's political success as an independent
The ____ is the official statement of policy goals established by each party every four years.
The Party platform is the official statement of policy goals established by each party every four years.
A formal set of fundamental objectives that are backed by the political party or individual candidate in order to appeal towards the general public is known as a political party platform (United states English), party programme, or party manifesto (preferential phrase in British and frequently Commonwealth English). The ultimate goal of these documents is to win the support and votes of the general public on complex issues or topics.
A plank is a portion of a political platform that expresses an organization's, person's, or party's beliefs and positions on a particular issue. The word "plank" refers metaphorically to a simple stage composed of slats or planks of wood and describes a part of an entire political platform.
To know more about Party platform:
brainly.com/question/29548334
#SPJ4
Which of the following most accurately describes direct finance?
The lenders and borrowers interact through a financial intermediary.
A buyer has a critical piece of information that directly affects the seller.
The lenders and borrowers come together in a market setting.
A seller has a critical piece of information that immediately affects the transaction.
The correct answer is lenders and borrowers come together in market setting.
What are lenders?Lenders are individuals or institutions that provide loans or credit to borrowers. They could be banks, credit unions, online lenders, or private individuals. Lenders assess the creditworthiness of borrowers based on factors such as credit history, income, and debt-to-income ratio. Depending on the type of loan and the lender's requirements, borrowers may be required to provide collateral or a co-signer to secure the loan. Lenders earn interest on the loans they provide, which is the profit they make on their investments. Borrowers must repay the loan amount with interest according to the terms and conditions agreed upon in the loan agreement. Lenders play an essential role in the economy by providing funding for businesses, individuals, and governments to invest in various project and initiatives.
To learn more about agreement, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14309911
#SPJ1
february 17, 1970, the family of this man was attacked and it was later determined via crime scene reconstruction that he was guilty of attacking his own family.
according to fisher, capitalist realism has so captured public thought that the idea of anti-capitalism no longer acts as the antithesis to capitalism. instead, it is deployed as a means for reinforcing capitalism
It explores Fisher's concept of "capitalist realism", which he describes as "the substantial feel that no longer most effective is capitalism the most effective possible political and economic system,
The key point in expertise realism is that it's miles a theory that argues that Unsavoury moves like warfare are vital tools of statecraft in an imperfect world and leaders should use them when it's miles in the countrywide interest. this is fully rational in a world where the survival of the state is pre-eminent.
Anti-capitalism is a political ideology and movement encompassing a selection of attitudes and ideas that oppose capitalism. on this sense, anti-capitalists are folks who want to replace capitalism with any other sort of monetary gadget, consisting of socialism or communism.
Learn more about "capitalist realism here:
https://brainly.com/question/28985687
#SPJ4
it is unconstitutional for law enforcement agencies to charge for provision of traditional services such as dui arrests. True/False ?
It is accurate to say that it is against the law for law enforcement organizations to charge for standard services like DUI arrests.
How long can you be imprisoned in California for a DUI?Minimum sentence of 180 days (6 months), maximum sentence of 1 year (16 months in state prison). If you murdered or seriously wounded someone, have a history of repeat crimes, or both, your DUI case may be prosecuted as a felony. DUI offenses carry a 1–5 year state jail sentence.
When are DUI arrests most common?According to an analysis of fatal DUI accidents that happened between 2016 and 2020, Saturdays and Sundays will be the two days of the week where driving will be the most hazardous in 2022.
To know more about DUI arrests visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/14861715
#SPJ4
Which aspect changed in the treatment of young criminal offenders during the 1960s?.
in 1916, congress approved legislation for the creation of the national park service, a power expressly given in which clause?
Answer:
The Necessary and Proper Clause or the Elastic Clause
Explanation:
Elastic Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 18:
"[The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
Supreme court justices who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint.
Judicial activism supporter's are Chief Justice John Roberts, became one of the most prominent proponents and Judicial restraint supporter's are Thomas Jefferson, Learned Hand and Hugo Black.
A philosophy of judicial interpretation, or how judges interpret the law, is known as judicial restraint. Definitions fluctuate a little bit from source to source, like the majority of abstract ideas. Judicial restraint is the idea of a judge not introducing his or her personal preferences into court cases and decisions. Judicial activism is a method of using the court review process or a term used to describe a specific judicial decision in which the judge was seen as being more inclined to rule on constitutional questions and to invalidate legislative or executive measures.
learn more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
Until 1880, america had a policy by which unlimited numbers of people from around the world could enter this country legally with few exceptions. How did this policy affect the american culture?.
The distinctive American mosaic culture was significantly established, and this policy has an impact on American culture. The distinctive American mosaic culture was firmly formed as a result.
Describe culture.The activities and beliefs that have been followed by the inhabitants of a given place for a long time are referred to as cultural practices. It stands for a society that adheres to social norms and members of an organization who hold same values and ideas. Human interaction with one another results in the sharing of culture, which is ultimately passed down from generation to generation.
A mosaic of American culture?Instead of being mixed together in one "pot," immigrant populations in the United States are creating a truly multicultural mosaic of American society.
To know more about American mosaic culture visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/18107926
#SPJ4
Question:
Until 1880, America had a policy by which unlimited numbers of people from around the world could enter this country legally with few exceptions. How did this policy affect American culture?
(A) It had no effect on American culture.
(B) Christianity overtook American culture.
(C) American culture held tight to its Great Britain roots.
(D) It greatly established the unique American mosaic culture.
the 2013 supreme court case shelby county v. holden invalidated the key accomplishments of the voting rights act of 1965, which led to a cascade of new state laws intended to limit the right to vote for poor people of all races. true or false?
It is true that the 2013 supreme court case shelby county v. holder invalidated the key accomplishments of the voting rights act of 1965, which led to a cascade of new state laws intended to limit the right to vote for poor people of all races.
About shelby county v. holder
The Supreme Court of the United States made a significant ruling in Shelby County v. Holder concerning the constitutionality of provisions of Voting Rights Act of the 1965: Sec 5 (which mandates that some states and local governments obtain federal preclearance before making any changes to their voting laws or practises) and Section 4(b), which includes the coverage formula which determines which jurisdictions seem to be subject to preclearance based on their historical voting patterns.
By a vote of 5 to 4, the Supreme Court declared Section 4(b) unconstitutional due to the coverage formula's reliance on data that was more than 40 years old and thus no longer responsive to immediate needs. This made it an impermissible burden just on legal principles of the federalism & equal state sovereignty.
To know more about shelby county v. holder:
brainly.com/question/29593288
#SPJ4
Jorge downloads a movie onto his laptop without permission from the movie provider. Jorge has violated:
a. trademark law.
b. copyright law.
c. trade distribution law.
d. cybersquatting law.
g as a matter of administrative convenience, the irs would prefer to have congress decrease (rather than increase) the amount of the standard deduction allowed to individual taxpayers.
TRUE. The IRS would prefer to have congress decrease the amount of the standard deduction allowed to individual taxpayers. On occasion, Congress must enact legislation that clarifies the tax law to change a result reached by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The standard deduction is a set sum of money that lowers the amount of income that is subject to taxation. The total of the basic standard deduction plus any additional standard deductions for old age or blindness constitutes your standard deduction. Generally speaking, the standard deduction changes depending on your filing status, whether you are 65 or older, blind, and/or whether another taxpayer can claim you as a dependent. It is also adjusted annually for inflation. Certain taxpayers are not eligible for the standard deduction. If you itemise your deductions, you are not eligible for the standard deduction.
To know more about Standard deduction:
https://brainly.com/question/29307306
#SPJ4
One of the various ways in which parties contribute to democratic governance is by __________.
a. dividing the electorate
b. narrowing voter choice
c. nominating candidates
d. reducing accountability mechanisms
e. reducing inter-party competition
Nominating candidates is one of the many ways that parties support democratic governance.
What do the democratic parties look like?In the US, elections are held under a two-party system. This shows that both major political parties are in power at each level of government. These two parties in the US are the Republican Party and the Democratic Party.
What is the name of the Democratic Party?The Democratic Party initially went by the name "The Democracy" during the Jacksonian era, but in 1844 the name "Democratic Party" was chosen and made official. "Democrats" or "Dems" are the party's members' nicknames.
To know more about Candidate nomination visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29616235
#SPJ4
What is the essential factor that defines whether a government has legitimacy?
O strong democratic institutions
O strong coercive power (police, etc.)
O the consent of the people
O providing social services to the people