Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
Answer: The right to choose which religion to practice.
Explanation:
By going to this new place they might be changing what they practice. But they have the right to do so.
With respect to the Imperial Crisis [events that culminated in the American Revolution],
which of the following events does not belong with the others?
With respect to the Imperial Crisis [events that culminated in the American Revolution], The First Great Awakening as an event does not belong with the others
This is further explained below.
What is the First Great Awakening?Generally, Spirituality and religious devotion saw a resurgence during the time period known as the First Great Awakening.
This sentiment was widespread in the American colonies from the 1730s all the way into the 1770s. During that time period in England, Scotland, and Germany, a far larger social revolution was taking place, and the resurrection of Protestant ideals was a component of that movement.
In conclusion, The First Great Awakening is an event that does not fit with the others in terms of the Imperial Crisis, which is a series of events that led up to the beginning of the American Revolution.
Read more about American Revolution.
https://brainly.com/question/27833385
#SPJ1
Complete Question's Options Not Found
50 Points Brainliest
Answer: C. a case involving the constitutionality of a restaurant chain refusing to serve specific customers.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP I NEED THIS BY TONIGHT!!!!
Task: Students should read the Overview - Rule of Law from the USCourts.gov website and then choose one of the rule of law case summary decisions found in the websites below. Students should state what case they researched and discuss whether or not they agreed with the court decision and provide their reasons.
https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/express-unpopular-views-rule-law
https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/participate-judicial-process-rule-law
https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/exercise-religious-practices-rule-law
https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/access-education-rule-law
The case that was researched would have to be the case of Snyder v. Phelps. That is the case that is in the first link.
What is the general overview of this case?This case was about a church group who due to the fact that they have become in disagreement with some of the happenings in the United States, staged a picketing that would directly affect one of the members of the group they had issues with.
The court decision that was made here is disagreed with because I believe that even though the people have their first amendment rights, they would still have to be sensitive to other groups in the society.
If they had these issues I believe that it would have been better they took it up directly with the government instead of having to show their insensitivity to a person that was in mourning right on the day they were burying their dead.
The right to privacy of this family was breached by the church group on this day that the picketing was done.
Read more on the rule of law here:
https://brainly.com/question/1266084
#SPJ1
i have to write a presentation on why the government needs to do more to improve public schools. can anyone help with a few reasons?
Answer:
governments can help other schools by:
students food ,school shoes,after school lessons and encouraging student to learn and chase thier future .....tryed..
Q1, Briefly explain the Similarity & differences between the two forms of democracy direct and Indirect
The entire community creates the legislature in a direct democracy. In contrast, the elected officials of the winning party constitute the administration and make up the legislature in an indirect democracy.
Define the similarity between direct and indirect democracy.Democracies can be divided into two categories: direct and representative. The United States has had this type of government ever since it was founded as a country, making it one of the only countries in modern history to do so after overthrowing an imperial parent state.
Today's democracies tend to be representative in style. Both representative and direct democracies operate with the permission of the populace. Both have elected leaders who are replaceable. Additionally, both allow for the creation and deletion of legislation.
Direct democracies have historically been very uncommon. However, today, they are still present in a number of Swiss cantons.
to know more about democracy check the link given below:
brainly.com/question/21256069
#SPJ9
James McGill has a client this client runs a top-of-the-chain fast-food restaurant this client is being prosecuted for being a criminal mastermind charged with murder and theft and contraband what type of consequence does he deserve (life in prison) (death sentence) (or 15 years with probation for 24 months)
Since James McGill is the criminal mastermind charged with murder and theft as well as contraband, the type of consequence he deserve is life in prison.
What was the The finale of 'Better Call Saul about?According to the program of "'Better Call Saul " Walter White's was said to be an "indispensable" criminal attorney, and Jimmy McGill was said to have received 86 years in prison after a brief United States v. Saul Goodman legal battle.
After several seasons of descending into darkness, Saul (Jimmy McGill) turned around and admitted to all of his wrongdoings, clearing Kim Wexler's (Rhea Seehorn) name.
Finally, we find Jimmy on a prison bus surrounded by prisoners who recognize him and scream "Better call Saul," having abandoned his Saul character. He was sentenced to 86 years, which is little longer than the seven years he initially sought.
Learn more about murder from
https://brainly.com/question/15101729
#SPJ1
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed."
What Enlightenment idea most influenced this passage?
Separation of Powers
Checks and Balances
Predestination
Social Contract theory
A right answer is option (a). The Enlightenment principle that most impacted this passage is the "separation of powers."
Why do We believe that all men are created equal and that these truths are self-evident?
The fundamental tenet that "all men are created equal" had significant ramifications for the libertarian system in the United States. Human equality was defined as the "self-evident truth" that all people were created equally and had equal natural rights, as well as equal dignity and legal equality.
What Jefferson meant when he said that all men are created equal What does the phrase "all men are created equal" mean to you now and how has it changed?He meant that American colonies could declare their independence, establish new governments, and take up their "separate and equal station" among other nations since they had the same rights to self-government as other peoples.
Learn more about "self-evident truth": https://brainly.com/question/7034059
#SPJ13
PART A: What is Roosevelt’s overall purpose in his speech? A) to inform Japan that the U.S. will take any means necessary to enact revenge
B) to notify the American people of the losses suffered in the Japanese attacks
C) to warn of impending danger in the form of more attacks from Japan and its allies
D) to reassure the American people that actions are being taken to protect the country
Which letter choice is the correct answer to this question?
Roosevelt’s overall purpose in his speech B) was to notify the American people of the losses suffered in the Japanese attacks.
They supplied help for farmers, the unemployed, kids, and the elderly. The brand new Deal covered new constraints and safeguards at the banking enterprise and efforts to re-inflate the economy after charges had fallen sharply.
He stays the youngest person to end up president of the U.S. Roosevelt became a leader of modern motion and championed his "rectangular Deal" domestic regulations, promising the average citizen equity, breaking of trusts, regulation of railroads, and pure food and tablets.
He stays the youngest character to become president of the united states. Roosevelt changed into a pacesetter of the modern movement and championed his "rectangular Deal" home policies, promising the common citizen fairness, breaking of trusts, the law of railroads, and pure meals and drugs.
Learn more about Roosevelt here https://brainly.com/question/25608255
#SPJ1
Read the proof. Given: AB ∥ DE Prove: △ACB ~ △DCE Triangle A B C is shown. Line D E is drawn inside of the triangle and is parallel to side A B. The line forms triangle D C E. We are given AB ∥ DE. Because the lines are parallel and segment CB crosses both lines, we can consider segment CB a transversal of the parallel lines. Angles CED and CBA are corresponding angles of transversal CB and are therefore congruent, so ∠CED ≅ ∠CBA. We can state ∠C ≅ ∠C using the reflexive property. Therefore, △ACB ~ △DCE by the AA similarity theorem. SSS similarity theorem. AAS similarity theorem. ASA similarity theorem
We can state ∠C ≅ ∠C victimization the reflexive property, AA Similarity Theorem.
The elementary theorem of similarity states that a line section splits a pair of sides of a triangle into proportional sections if and providing the segment is parallel to Triangulum's third side.
Given: AB ∥ American state, To Prove: Given Triangle rudiment with Line DE drawn inside the triangle and parallel to side AB. the road DE forms a brand new triangle DCE. Because AB∥DE and segment CB crosses each line, we are able to contemplate segment CB as a transverse of the parallel lines. Angles CED and CBA are corresponding angles of transversal CB and are thus congruent, thus ∠CED ≅ ∠CBA.
We will state ∠C ≅ ∠C victimization the reflexive property. Therefore, by the AA similarity theorem.
Learn more about the Similarity Theorem here: https://brainly.com/question/21247688
#SPJ1
HELPPPP PLEASEEE
An appeals court can change the outcome of an earlier trial by:
Answer: The appellant can try to persuade the judge that the trial court has made an error, and they explain why the decision should be reversed.
Explanation: This is possible, but in some cases can be difficult, as there are usually small errors that don't cause the trial to be reversible.
What is Personal Injury Protection
The ability of the government to “restrict” or stop speech based on its content is generally ruled as unconstitutional. Explain the reasoning behind this:
For state security, the government may restrict speech and expression. However, security concerns must be exacerbated by threats to public order, such as revolt, insurrection, or war against the state.
This is further explained below.
What is freedom of speech?Generally, Freedom of speech allows people to express their views without fear of reprisal, censorship, or legal action.
In order to ensure the safety of the state, the government has the authority to restrict citizens' rights to freedom of speech and expression.
However, the risks to security must be a severe danger to public order, such as a revolt, an insurrection, or an act of war against the state.
Read more about freedom of speech
https://brainly.com/question/7723076
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements best describes the meaning of the phrase "all men are created equal"?
Humans had equal natural rights, equally gave their consent to create a republican government, had equal dignity, and were equal under the law.
In the national rebirth after the war Lord Lincoln's use of “all men” at least set the stage for “all men” becoming equally free. However, his meaning probably did not mean “all men” as it is used today; rather simply that no one should be another's slave.
Which scenario shows an example of a right that is protected under the First Amendment?
yelling “Fire!” in a crowded theater
stating an unpopular opinion
harassing someone on social media
urging someone to commit violence
Answer:
The scenario that shows an example of a right that is protected under the first ammendment is starting an unpopular opinion.
Explanation:
Criticism of the government, political dissatisfaction, and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy are nearly always protected by the First Amendment.
i believe its B but im not sure
^HELP^ Axel has always wanted better clothes and gadgets. His parents are very strict and require that Axel work at the family pharmacy after school. They tell him that he can save the money he earns to buy the things he wants. Axel’s friends ask him if he could get them drugs from the pharmacy. They offer him more money than he could earn in a whole month! Axel decides to take the pills from his family’s pharmacy, selling them to his friends. He becomes known as the person to go to if anyone wants drugs. Axel didn’t wake up one morning and decide he wanted to become a drug dealer; instead, what criminal theory offers the BEST explanation for how this happened? A.
social pathology
B.
social disorganization theory
C.
theory of deviant places
D.
differential opportunity theory
As Axel did not wake up one morning and decide he wanted to become a drug dealer; instead, the criminal theory that offers the BEST explanation for how this happened is known as the differential opportunity theory.
What is a differential opportunity theory?During the 1960s, some group of criminologists that includes Richard Cloward and Lloyd Ohlin developed the theory of differential opportunity which posits that juveniles and young adults may turn to a deviant activity because they are unable to become financially and socially successful via means that society deems legitimate.
These differential opportunity theorists believed that those individuals who are unable to accomplish goals in ways are more likely to attempt to acquire capital and status via illegitimate or deviant means. The theory further stated that in these cases, most people are more likely to engage in subcultures or different groups of criminal activities.
As drug dealing will offer him more money than he could earn in a whole month, then, the differential opportunity theory is apparent therein. Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about differential opportunity
brainly.com/question/28259079
#SPJ1
Answer:
D. differential opportunity theory
Explanation:
The person above is correct. Plato, just took the test,
Citizens typically turn to the police when they want assistance with youths'
behaviors because:
A
O the law requires them to contact the police
O the police are the most visible component of the juvenile justice process.
O their friends encourage them to contact the police
O All of these are correct
Numerous police agencies set up separate divisions to deal with juveniles and assigned particular officers to handle juvenile offenders.
What are four typical responses that police officers employ when handling juvenile cases?Formal police actions may involve detaining a minor, gathering information, referring them to a social services organization or the juvenile court, issuing a citation, or making an arrest (Walker).
Legal considerations could include the gravity of the offense, the quantity of the officer's evidence, whether or not the juvenile appeared to be under the influence of drugs or alcohol, and whether or not the victim requested that the police take action.
Numerous police agencies set up separate divisions to deal with juveniles and assigned particular officers to handle juvenile offenders. Today, the police play the role of "gatekeeper" in the JJS; they are frequently the juvenile's first point of contact with the system.
The gravity of the crime is the primary factor influencing police decisions regarding juveniles.
Therefore, the correct answer is option D. All of these are correct.
To learn more about youth's behaviors refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/4700633
#SPJ4
Answer:
O All of these are correct
Explanation: hope this helps
A therapist bills the insurance company for a session in which the patient did not show up. According to Marshall Clinard and Richard Quinney, what kind of crime is this?
A.
occupational crime
B.
organizational crime
C.
corporate crime
D.
personal crime
Answer:A
Explanation:I think
what best describes the difference between the Departments of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security?
Answer:
Essentially, the Department of Defense deals with mostly foreign countries and military actions against the US homeland. For example, the Department of Defense will upkeep equipment and facilities, as well as maintaining a force at home.
The Department of Homeland Security, on the other hand, deals primarily with domestic emergencies and counterterrorism. For example, the Department of Homeland Security would access funds to secure America's borders, as well as gather information on potential terrorists and keep tabs on them. They may also provide emergency relief funds and supplies plus personnel's to areas affected by natural disasters.
Learn more about the differences between the two Departments, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4323382 - See adriansp's answer.
PLEASE HELP ASAP ITS CRIMINAL JUSTICE
I finished it on my own and these are the answers I put
Answer: those are all correct
Explanation:
After running a successful business for many years, the IRS filed suit against Matt. They accused him of committing tax fraud because he was not collecting sales tax from his customers. Matt had always meticulously kept records on his income and paid taxes based on that, but he was not aware that he should also be collecting sales tax. Either way, the IRS said that Matt had committed a crime. What motive would Matt MOST likely offer to explain his actions?
self defense
duress
accident
ignorance
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
Answer:
ignorance
Explanation:
69 Points + Brainliest + Rate
Read this summary of the Gideon v. Wainwright Supreme Court case.
A Florida man named Clarence Earl Gideon was charged with breaking into other people’s property. He appeared in state court and explained that he could not afford a lawyer. The court did not appoint him a lawyer, so Gideon had to represent himself. He was convicted of the crime. Gideon appealed his conviction on the grounds that the court had denied him the right to a lawyer. The Supreme Court agreed and overturned the conviction.
Which amendment did the court refer to when deciding that Gideon’s rights had been violated?
the Fourth Amendment
the Sixth Amendment
the Seventh Amendment
the Eighth Amendment
Answer:
the Sixth Amendment
Reference points help a motorist judge his or her place in an area to the front, back and sides of the vehicle.
Oa) True
O
b) False
It is true that reference points help a motorist judge his or her place in an area to the front, back and sides of the vehicle.
What is a reference?In a relationship between objects known as a reference, one object marks, serves as a conduit for connecting to, or links to, another object. The second object is said to be referenced by the first object in this relationship. The second object is known by its name. Referent refers to the second item, which is what the first object relates to. The typical definition of a name is a word, phrase, or other symbolic representation. Anything can serve as its referent, including tangible things, living beings, events, activities, and abstract ideas.
To learn more about reference, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13334567
#SPJ13
30 Points + Brainliest + Rated
The Supreme Court decided that Ernesto Miranda’s rights had been violated by the state of Arizona and overturned his conviction. This meant that the state of Arizona had to retry Miranda.
How did the Supreme Court case affect Miranda’s new trial?
His trial would not include a jury.
His trial could not be on the same charge.
His confession could not count as evidence.
His sentence would be less severe if he were convicted.
Answer: After Miranda's conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court, the State of Arizona retried him.
Explanation:
At the second trial, Miranda's confession was not introduced into evidence. Miranda was once again convicted and sentenced to 20-30 years in prison
The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, ruled that the prosecution could not introduce Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal trial because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Answer: His confession could not count as evidence.
Explanation:
He was not informed he had the right to an attorney, and he confessed to what he did. They said his confession could not count as evidence because he was not told he had the right to an attorney.
um hi i was just testing this out to see what happens and for the badge
Who/when was the Magna Carta written?
Answer:
The Magna Carta was written on June 15, 1215, and was written by Archbishop of Canterbury
Explanation:
How did Lemaître's reasoning lead him to develop the concept
of the "primeval atom?
The first person to provide a particular model for the Big Bang itself was presumably the Belgian priest and cosmologist Georges Lemaître.
Which cosmologist thought the first atom created the universe?
Lemaître claimed, using the then-new quantum theory of matter, that the physical world began as a single particle, the "primeval atom," which then dissolved in an explosion, creating space and time and the universe's ongoing expansion.
How was Lemaitre's hypothesis developed?
Georges Lemaître's method for discovering the big bang. Georges Lemaitre solved or introduced a metric to Einstein's general relativity field equations, which led to the discovery of the idea of the origin of the universe. His cosmos is described as homogenous, isotropic, and expanding by his metric or model.
To learn more about Lemaitre's from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/1314887
#SPJ9
at cooks world, a kitchen equipment store, most employees work less than 40 hours per week. however, only employees who work a minimum of 40 hours per week are eligible for health insurance
As a requirement of the employer mandate, the employer must offer health insurance to the workers. It is essential that businesses provide defined contribution plans as an alternative to traditional health insurance.
A defined-contribution plan is a kind of pension fund wherein an employer and/or employee make contributions in accordance with conditions set down by both parties. The employee selects the investments to be made with the pension funds and assumes the risk of loss from subpar choices.
Various work contracts have varying levels of contribution. The defined-contribution plan may incorporate recurrent payments from the employee or the employer depending on the particular employment arrangements.
To know more about contribution plans click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/28603314
#SPJ9
How does Russia and Ukraine war effects us
The economy takes a large toll. Many countries get supplies from Russia and Ukraine, but since the war, Russia has been with holding resources and Ukraine doesn't have enough to share. The US has been giving Ukraine food and things like that which takes a minor economic toll. Most countries get the majority of their gasoline from Russia but recently that hasn't been a viable option. If you look at fuel prices you can see that they've risen exponentially over the past few months.
Who are the respondents in relation to the decedent?
The spouse or family member of a deceased man, the respondents in respect to the decedent.
A respondent is somebody who is termed upon to issue a response to communication created by an associate academic degree other. The term is utilized in legal contexts, in survey methodology, and in psychological learning. In legal usage, this specifically refers to the litigant in an exceedingly proceedings commenced by a petition, or to an appellee, or the opposing party, in attractiveness of a decision by an initial fact-finder.
Decedent could be a term that's usually employed in the law governing estates and trusts, in reference to one that has died. Both “decedent” and “deceased” are wont to seek advice from somebody who has passed away. “Decedent” is often used in legal terms.“Deceased” is commonly used when talking about the victim of a homicide.
Learn more about Respondents here: https://brainly.com/question/24360512
#SPJ1
How does covid-19 relate to government
There are several ways that Covid-19 relates to the government and they include:
Health campaigns to prevent the spread of the disease Economic decisions to help those affected by the economic effects of Covid-19Pandemic guidelines to guide the nation through the Covid-19 pandemic. How is the government involved in managing Covid-19?The government has to make decisions about how the nation will get through the Covid-19 pandemic which is why the disease is related to the government.
The government needs to come up with pandemic guidelines and health campaigns such as social distancing and quarantines. They also need to make economic decisions such as stimulus checks to help people through the pandemic.
Find out more on Covid-19 at https://brainly.com/question/28309934
#SPJ1