Makeup with a synopsis of a criminal act. I

Answer: true

Explanation:

Here, Community structures refers to an uniformed & authorized way of buildings layout, road routes, railroad etc, which follows the community plan.

In conclusion, the involvement of this plan is important in solving burglaries problems because its instills Fear of security and thus discourage attempted burglary from occupant of the community.

Read more on this here

brainly.com/question/24447737

Classical liberalism is a political philosophy and a branch of liberalism that favors free markets and laissez-faire economics, as well as civil rights under the rule of law, with a focus on limited government, economic equality, and political freedom.

Classical republicanism, also known as civic republicanism or civic humanism, is a type of republicanism that emerged during the Renaissance and was influenced by classical antiquity's political institutions and literature, particularly those of Aristotle, Polybius, and Cicero.

According to certain contemporary political theories, a classical republic is a Classical Antiquity state with a democratic system of government, a state where power was held by the people rather than a ruler or monarch.

Thus, The Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights strike a balance between principles so Option A is the correct answer.

For more information about classical republicanism refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/4714495

You look amazing. : )

ans:it's true

Explanation:

its true because if A LAW IS CONSIDERED UNCONSITUTIONAL IF IT EXPANDS RIGHTS GIVEN TO

CITIZENS BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

Answer:

no

Explanation:

this will help the criminals to be alert of officers

Nonaccidental physical injuries children suffer at the hands of their parents occur along a continuum that ranges from mild to severe. At the outer edges of this continuum, one might find, on the one hand, a slight swat to the buttocks, and on the other, a brutal beating. In the United States, the normative consensus appears to be that outsiders to the family are appropriately concerned only when the physical injury at issue causes serious harm; any injury short of a serious one is exclusively “family business.”Consistent with this consensus, all states’ laws permit the use of “reasonable” corporal punishment; simultaneously, they all prohibit non accidentally inflicted serious injury. The latter is generally denominated abuse, although some states classify milder but still impermissible injuries as neglect, or simply “inappropriate discipline.” Thus, being able to distinguish between reasonable corporal punishment and maltreatment—whether this is formally denominated abuse or neglect—is critical for the relevant actors: parents who use corporal punishment as a disciplinary tool, child protective services (CPS) staff who are required by statute to intervene in the family to protect children subject to or at risk of abuse, and courts adjudicating issues arising in connection with these cases. The integrity of the distinction and of the methodology employed to make it is also critical for a society that is prominently committed to both family autonomy and child welfare, and in particular to protecting the integrity of the family when it promotes (or at least does not harm) child welfare, and to intervening in the family when it fails in its related obligations.Unfortunately, few if any states have sufficiently defined the relevant terms “reasonable corporal punishment” or “maltreatment” (abuse or neglect) to consistently guide the relevant actors (those in a single system) in their exercises of discretion; nor have they established a coherent methodology for sorting injuries along the continuum of nonaccidental physical injuries. That administrative regulations and policies promulgated by state and local CPS departments often narrow agency discretion helps CPS itself to be more consistent and may help families know what to expect when they are dealing with CPS. But because appellate courts do not appear to give much deference to agency interpretations of the statutory definitions, these regulations and policies do little to guide the courts’ own exercise of discretion. Moreover, to the extent that the law in statutes and judicial opinions is either less precise or even different from the law as it is applied by CPS, the public and parents are inevitably confused or misled. As a result, decisionmaking about whether an injury or incident remains in the realm of family business or has crossed the line into the impermissible varies, reflecting a multiplicity of purely personal viewpoints, religious and political ideologies, and academic or disciplinary training and requirements. In turn, institutional treatment of and outcomes for children and families are often inconsistent. The status quo has been defended or at least explained on several grounds. The vagueness of abuse definitions has been consistently upheld on policy grounds—specifically on the argument that it is important for authorities to retain flexibility to call injuries as they see them given that, particularly in a diverse society, abuse might appear in unexpected forms.

Explanation:

just wanted a quick email to restaurant for dinner on Sunday night for a few minutes of zeros to use patterns and a few more

Answer:A gunshot victim's clothing should be preserved, as a GSR distribution pattern can assist in distance determinations. The clothing must be carefully removed, not folded, and allowed to dry. Clothing from both victim and potential shooters should be seized as it may contain GSR, blood spatter, glass fragments, other forms of trace or transfer evidence, or tears, damage, or soil patterns that may be useful for reconstruction purposes. The presence of trace evidence or damage to the clothing may be used to corroborate a statement regarding movement or events during and after the shooting incident. Documentation of possible GSR (and other evidence) on clothing is best accomplished at the crime scene before packaging. oc.

Explanation:

The event that is TRUE about the presence of gunpowder residue on a person is Every person who fires a gun will have visible gunpowder on their hands. Thus the correct option is A.

Gunpowder has had a variety of uses, such as those related to explosives, fireworks, weapons, and armaments. The development of gunpowder is a significant historical development since it altered military tactics and brought about political and cultural transformation in Europe.

If someone has gunshot residue on their hands, it means they will either have recently shot a gun, handled a gun or something with trace evidence on it, or were nearby when the gun was fired.

Therefore, option A Every person who fires a gun will have visible gunpowder on their hands is appropriate.

learn more about Gunpowder, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13909238

#SPJ2

Answer:

High risk

Explanation:

The sentencing guideline is a formula that is used by judges to impose criminal sentences.

The sentencing guidelines helps in the court of law by giving a structure at the stage where the offence of the person is being defined and other elements are being considered in the act that was committed.

In simple terms, the sentencing guideline is a non binding guideline that serves by giving information regarding sentences in the law court.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/15152861?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

Sorry but I don't understand

Answer:

fun

Explanation:

Because a there is no such thing as a fun call and it doesn't exist,I have never heard someone talking about a fun call.

Answer:

so hard questions I can't answer it pls sorry

Answer:

PLATO

Explanation:

Explanation:

values: liberty, equality, and democracy.

features. brief, broad, and definite

Answer:

Programs such as diversion, restitution, probation, parole, pardon, and various provisions for temporary release from prison or jail are included in the Community Based Corrections being implemented by the corrections pillar of our criminal justice system.

Explanation:

In general, the national prisons housed more serious offenders, and those serving short-term sentences were held in local facilities. The prison system at the national level was supervised by the Bureau of Prisons of the Department of Justice. The government maintained six correctional institutions and penal farms.

Answer:

1. Physiological needs

2. Safety needs

3. Love and belongingness needs

4. Esteem needs

5. Self-actualization needs

Explanation:

Physiological needs - these are biological requirements for human survival, e.g. air, food, drink, shelter, clothing, warmth, sex, sleep.

Safety needs - once an individual’s physiological needs are satisfied, the needs for security and safety become salient.

Love and belongingness needs - after physiological and safety needs have been fulfilled, the third level of human needs is social and involves feelings of belongingness.

Esteem needs are the fourth level in Maslow’s hierarchy and include self-worth, accomplishement and respect.

Self-actualization needs are the highest level in Maslow's hierarchy, and refer to the realization of a person's potential, self-fulfillment, seeking personal growth and peak experiences.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

the law is above everything and everyone in a country thus it controls every aspect of society, government, groups, code of conduct of people and business

My opinion about this situation is that the police are not at fault because they should have all the necessary resources to intervene in these situations, but that is a state matter that they do not control.

Housebreaking is a criminal practice in which an individual enters a house, apartment, or private property without the consent of the owner or the person in charge of the same and extracts valuables or attacks those who live there.

This crime requires the intervention of police officers because they have the training and the necessary tools to stop this event and bring the criminals to a judge.

However, on some occasions, the police officers do not have the necessary resources (defense weapons, cars, gasoline for the car, uniforms, among others) to intervene in these situations so they refrain from doing so since an intervention without some elements could cause damage to their physical integrity.

Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/13048987

Answer:

b) Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)

Explanation:

The primary and most commonly used tests for diagnosing HIV and AIDs include ELISA Test ELISA, which stands for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, is used to detect HIV infection. If an ELISA test is positive, the Western blot test is usually administered to confirm the diagnosis.

Hope this helps! Smile : )

Answer:

b

Explanation:

it is the most common test used because the results are accurate and faster analysis for the tester to be able to know what treatment is best.

Answer:

Possibly C

Explanation:

I don't know anything about law. But the most reaonable answer to me seems C. You shouldn't believe me though.

Answer:

sorry I need the points I got no answer

The source of the bus owner liability is its contract to transport Mr P.

Let understand that there is a contract binding between the Bus owner and Mr P because he paid T-fare which is seen as Consideration in Contract Law.

The bus-owner is at responsibility to transport safely Mr P to his destination. Because of these safety measures, insurance policy are effected to provided compensation of liability that occurs as a result of the bus owner vehicle.

Therefore, in this case, Mr P is entitled to recover damages from the bus and the source of the bus owner's liability is its contract with Mr P.

Learn more about this here

brainly.com/question/21153040