Is 1.875 an rational or irrational number

Answer: D is the answer

Step-by-step explanation: Because a irrational number is a number that is non-reapting and non-terminating and it cannot be written as a ratio  or a fraction

Hope this helps...

Given :

A mountain climber started his climb at 50 feet above see level .

He then raised 3 feet to rest in his cot to make his final 10 feet climb down.

To Find :

An expression to find his position relative to his final position.

Solution :

Let , final position is h .

h is given by :

[tex]h=\text{(Initial position)-(initial descended)+(height raised to rest)-(final descended)}\\\\h=50 -28 +3-10\ feet\\\\h=15\ feet[/tex]

So , his final position is 15 feet .

Hence , this is the required solution .

Greetings from Brasil...

Looking at the attachment we can use some properties:

(A/B) ÷ (C/D) = (A/B) · (D/C)

(M/N) · (P/Q) = (M/Q) · (P/N)

One solution:

...........................................................

another polynomial division

https://brainly.com.br/tarefa/30341397

Answer:

  2 1/3 cubic inches

Step-by-step explanation:

Perhaps you want to know the volume of the prism in cubic inches.

Find the total volume of the smaller cubes:

  63(1/3 in)^3 = 63/27 in^3 = 7/3 in^3 = 2 1/3 in^3

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To do this we need to first multiply by the number of feet in a mile to get:

311520 feet per hour

Then we divide by 3600 to get this into feet per second:

86.53333... feet per second

Now rounding this we get 87 feet per second.

Answer:

You can determine whether each element of the domain is paired with exactly one element of the range. For example, if given a graph, you could use the vertical line test; if a vertical line intersects the graph more than once, then the relation that the graph represents is not a function

Answer:

Swimmer's velocity = 1.4 m/s west (Approx)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Total time taken = 35 seconds

Total displacement to west = 50 meter

Find:

Swimmer's velocity

Computation:

Swimmer's velocity = Total displacement to west / Total time taken

Swimmer's velocity = 50 / 35

Swimmer's velocity = 1.428

Swimmer's velocity = 1.4 m/s west (Approx)

Answer:

approximately 1.4 m/s west

yeeeeeeeeeeet

-2 is the slope if that's what's asked ?

Step-by-step explanation:

its b..........

Bbbbb

The farm uses two harvesting tools for packages that needs to be sold. So, we have to consider the rates of both harvest tools and the number of harvest by both tools. The algebraic expression is: [tex]0.95(200h) + 0.90(22000m)[/tex]

Given that

[tex]h \to[/tex] days of hand pickers word

[tex]m \to[/tex] days harvester machine is used

[tex]n_h = 200[/tex] --- pounds of hand pickers

[tex]n_m = 22000[/tex] -- pounds of harvester

[tex]r_h = 95\%[/tex] -- pack out rate of hand pickers

[tex]r_m = 90\%[/tex] -- pack out rate of harvester

The expression to estimate the amount is calculated as:

[tex]Amount = r_h \times n_h + r_m \times n_m[/tex] --- i.e. pounds of hand picker * its pack out rate + pounds of harvester * its pack out rate

So, we have:

[tex]Amount = 95\% \times 200h + 90\% \times 22000m[/tex]

Express as decimal

[tex]Amount = 0.95 \times 200h + 0.90 \times 22000m[/tex]

Rewrite as:

[tex]Amount = 0.95(200h) + 0.90(22000m)[/tex]

Hence, option (b) is correct.

Read more about algebraic expression at:

https://brainly.com/question/953809

Answer:

[tex]x = \frac{-7y}{3} +9[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Note the equal sign, what you do to one side, you do to the other side. Do the opposite of PEMDAS. Isolate the variable, x.

PEMDAS is the order of operation, and =

Parenthesis

Exponents (& Roots)

Multiplication

Division

Addition

Subtraction

~

First, subtract 7y from both sides:

3x + 7y (-7y) = 27 (-7y)

3x = -7y + 27

Next, divide 3 from all terms on both sides:

(3x)/3 =  (-7y + 27)/3

x = (-7y/3) + 9

[tex]x = \frac{-7y}{3} +9[/tex]

Answer:

0.......................

Answer:

17) sometimes

18) sometimes

19) sometimes

20) sometimes

21)what is it asking

Step-by-step explanation:

17) in terms of the square that's correct but in terms of a rectangle it's not

18) the the angles could be 30, 60, 92, 178.. the four angles have to add up to 360 but they could be 150 for example 30, 30, 150, 150,

19) in in terms of a rectangle, kite etc it's correct. but for a kite or a trapezoid it's not

20) in in terms of a kite yes but in terms of a square no.

21)??

Answer:

C, 38°

Step-by-step explanation:

ray UW is the angle bisector of ∠VUT

--> m∠VUW = m∠WUT = 1/2 m∠VUT

<=> 4x + 6 = 6x - 10

<=> 6 + 10 = 6x - 4x

<=> 2x = 16

<=> x = 8

So, the measure of m∠WUT is: 6x - 10 = 6 . 8 - 10 = 48 - 10 = 38°

Answer:

92, 95, 100, 120, 128

Step-by-step explanation:

92, 95, 100, 120, 128

Answer:

1) -66

2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

a=4

b=-5

c=-7

=a+2bc

=4+2*-5*7

=4+(-10*7)

=4-70

=-66

=3a

=3(4)

=12

Hope this helps ;) ❤❤❤

Answer:

-66, 12

Step-by-step explanation:

4+2 times-5 times -7 times

-70+4= 66

Answer:

Ok, we have:

d(t) = 3*t^2 + 5*t - 2.

The first interval is:

(2, 3)

and remember that, for an interval (a,b), the difference quotient is:

D = (f(b) - f(a))/(b -a)

Then in this first interval we have:

[tex]d = \frac{d(3) - d(2)}{3-2} = \frac{3*3^2 + 5*3 - 2 - (3*2^2 + 5*2 - 2)}{1} = 20[/tex]

So the average rate of change in (2,3) is 20.

now, in (2, 2.5) we have:

[tex]d = \frac{d(2.5) - d(2)}{3-2} = \frac{3*2.5^2 + 5*2.5 - 2 - (3*2^2 + 5*2 - 2)}{1} = 9.25[/tex]

So here the rate of change is 9.25

And in the interval (2, 2.1) we have:

[tex]d = \frac{d(2.1) - d(2)}{3-2} = \frac{3*2.1^2 + 5*2.1 - 2 - (3*2^2 + 5*2 - 2)}{1} = 1.73[/tex]

So in this interval the rate of change is 1.73

Answer:

2 to 3 is 20

2 to 2.5 is 15

2 to 2.1 is 11

Step-by-step explanation:

I got this question right on EDGE 2023

Answer:

4x +12

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]5x + 2 - x + 10\\\\\mathrm{Group\:like\:terms}\\=5x-x+2+10\\\\\mathrm{Add\:similar\:elements:}\:5x-x=4x\\=4x+2+10\\\\\mathrm{Add\:the\:numbers:}\:2+10=12\\=4x+12[/tex]

let the absolute weight of the box of cereal be X

20-0.75 ≤ x ≤ 20+0.75

19.25 ≤ x ≤ 20.75

Answer:

1. A particular order in which related events, movements, or things follow each other.

2. A term

3. Patterns offer visual clues to an underlying order. Patterns can also be used as a template that will enable one to quickly analyze a situation and understand how it works.

4. Sequence of numbers such that the difference between the consecutive terms is constant.

The solution to the equation is n = -2.

To solve the equation 30 = -5(6n + 6) step-by-step, follow these procedures:

Step 1: Distribute the -5 on the right side:

30 = -5 * 6n - 5 * 6

Step 2: Simplify the right side:

30 = -30n - 30

Step 3: Move constant term to one side:

30 + 30 = -30n

Step 4: Combine like terms:

60 = -30n

Step 5: Divide both sides by -30 to isolate 'n':

n = 60 / -30

Step 6: Simplify the right side:

n = -2

The solution to the equation is n = -2.

To know more about equation:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ6

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The question with some background info added:

Let the length of the room be L feet measured by the carpenter

Then

Answer:

8.

Step-by-step explanation:

d/dx(8x)

= 8 * d/dx(x)

= 8 * 1

= 8.

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

Simplify the following:

2/2

Hint: | Divide 2 by 2.

2/2 = (2×1)/2 = 1:

Answer: 1

Answer:

7 pounds 3 ounces

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 16 ounces in a pound. In order to convert ounces to pounds, we need to see how many 16s fit into 115 (how many full pounds can be made with 115 ounces) and add the remainder as ounces. To do this we can do long division (which gives us 7 remainder 3), or we can divide 115 by 16 (=7.1875) and convert the decimal places to ounces by multiplying 0.1875 pounds (the remainder) by 16 (as there are 16 ounces in pound) which gives us 3 ounces.

So 115 ounces is equal to 7 pounds and 3 ounces.

Hope this helped!

The baby's weight is 7 pounds and 3 ounces.

To convert ounces to pounds, we need to divide the number of ounces by the conversion factor, which is 16. There are 16 ounces in 1 pound.

Let's denote the baby's weight in ounces as W oz, the weight in pounds as W lb, and the remaining ounces as Roz.

W oz = 115 ounces

W lb = ?

R oz = ?

First, we divide the total number of ounces by 16 to find the number of pounds:

W lb = W oz / 16

= 115/ 16

= 7.1875 pounds

So, the baby weighs 7 pounds.

To determine the remaining ounces, we multiply the decimal portion of the pounds (0.1875) by 16:

R oz = 0.1875 x 6

R oz= 3 ounce

So, the baby weighs an additional 3 ounces.

Therefore, the baby's weight is 7 pounds and 3 ounces.

Learn more about Unit Conversion here:

brainly.com/question/28600662

#SPJ6

Answer: 90

Step-by-step explanation:

We first need to find three consecutive numbers that adds up to 267. We know that the numbers will be somewhat close to 100 because the sum needs to be past 250.

Let's try 85,86,87.

85+86+87=258

258 is very close to 267. We know that we need to increase our numbers.

Let's try 88,89,90.

88+89+90=267

88,89, and 90 added together gives us 267. The question asks for the largest integer. In 88, 89, 90, 90 is the largest integer.

Answer:

(2x +5) + 3x = 90

5x + 5 = 90

5x = 85

x = 17

i need 1 more brainliest to get expert rank!

Steps to solve:

3x - 8 = -2; x - 6

~Substitute

3(x - 6) = -2

~Distribute left side

3x - 18 = -2

~Add 18 to both sides

3x = 16

~Divide 3 to both sides

x = 16/3

Best of Luck!