how many major provisions were in The 1973 War Powers

President Andrew Jackson might have ppushed for the Indian Removal Act in Congress because:

The President wanted Congress to see reasons why the Indian Removal Act was necessary. This push must have sailed easily as his audience was a white majority.

Many of them wanted the Cherokee nation to give way for the white settlers in Georgia. So his argument must have been persuasive.

Learn more about the Indian Removal Act here:

https://brainly.com/question/714974

#SPJ1

One way that Islam spread in Northern Africa was b. The Islamic empire established a center of learning in the territories.

Apart from trade with Arab Muslims, North Africans picked up Islam thanks to the knowledge that they gained from local centers of learning.

These learning centers were set up to ensure that people could learn and appreciate the Islamic creed.

Find out more on Islamic centers of learning at https://brainly.com/question/15070909.

#SPJ1

Answer:

To remain a world power.

Explanation:

Germany canceled payment on the great bulk of the reparations despite the fact that the pact wasn't as punitive as popular history portrays. Germany was spared a fortune because to the compulsory military reduction, which more than covered the cost of reparations. Remember that Germany had a tremendous military budget even in the years leading up to World War One. Also keep in mind that, previous to World War 1, Germany possessed the most expensive army and second-most expensive navy in the world. It was economically prudent to go from all of the earlier military spending to what are now regarded as Keynesian spending plans. The massive debt Germany incurred after World War One had a considerably greater impact on its post-war economy than reparations. Germany didn't raise any taxes to fund the war effort throughout World War One; instead, 90% of the expense was covered by a national debt that they planned to settle with the proceeds of victory. The economic troubles in Germany were worsened by this than by the reparations. After World War 1, Germany did, however, experience generally phenomenal economic expansion. Versailles's harm was greatly exaggerated for propaganda objectives. Nevertheless, compared to WW1, Germany's economic and military power was far lower at the start of WW2. Apart from technological advancements, the German army was significantly less effective than it had been during World War One, and Hitler had skewed the German economy unfavorably in favor of military rearmament, relying on plundering conquered countries to prevent an economic meltdown.

Answer:

the traditional system is by the far most common form of economic organisation used by humans history

Explanation:

there are three main types of economics free market command and mixed the chart below compare free market and command economics mix economics are combination the two

The exposed consequences are related to the establishment of the Compromise of 1877, in which the whites of the South recovered much of their power.

The Reconstruction period (1865 to 1877) is the term by which the period of time after the Civil War is known in which several problems were put to an end, such as:

However, the Compromise of 1877 allowed the white elite of the Southern States to regain their leading role in the federal government, this allowed the reconstruction of systems of racial segregation and discrimination.

On the other hand, the entry into the new century and the desire for development caused the native communities to be dispossessed of their productive lands because the development of the country was going to require these resources.

Learn more about reconstruction in: https://brainly.com/question/16792041

#SPJ1

✫Statement: All though Many factors were Affecting East Pakistan but Religious Difference was Not a Cause Because both East & West Pakistan were Islam Followers.

✪Extra Shot: India Helped East Pakistan to gain Freedom from West Pakistan and Formed A New Nation Bangladesh!

~Answered By: ActiveNeuron:)

The inference is that Muir try to persuade his audience in this excerpt is D. He appeals to readers' feelings of nostalgia for natural beauty that might be lost.

An inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information given in a story.

In this case, the inference is that Muir try to persuade his audience in this excerpt is that he appeals to readers' feelings of nostalgia for natural beauty that might be lost.

Learn more about inference on:

brainly.com/question/25280941

#SPJ1

The conclusion that can be drawn from the above-stated statement is that president bush believes in the United States maintaining its role as a superpower to secure world affairs. hence option A is correct

According to the Bush Doctrine, US adversaries wage an ideological war against the country through terrorism. The US has a duty to defend itself by advancing democracy in areas that are active in order to weaken the justification for them.

In response, Bush proclaimed a global war, and Congress established the US Department of Homeland Security.

Hence option A is correct.

Learn more about President Bush:

https://brainly.com/question/15966123

#SPJ1

Answer:

He believes in the United States maintaining its role as a superpower to secure world affairs.

Explanation:

Edmentum

Radio is a communication instrument invented by Guglielmo Marconi, which revolutionized the way in which communication was established in society.

The radio is an equipment that encompasses three important technologies of the period, telegraphy, transmitting waves and the wireless telephone, which manage to reach a large number of listeners.

Television was invented in 1920 by John Baird, who improved radio technology through the transmission of images, being one of the most widespread means of communication in the world.

After the invention of the TV, the first computer was developed, called ENIAC, created in 1943 and a high investment of more than 6 million dollars.

The cellphone is already the most recent invention, invented in 1973 by Martin Cooper, the prototype being the Motorola DynaTAC 8000X.

Regarding means of transport, the train was invented in 1814 by George Stephenson, revolutionizing the way in which people and equipment were transported from one place to another.

Each technological invention is capable of generating development for society. Historically we see that each invention, from radio to cell phone, are improved versions and developed to make communication faster and more dynamic, increasing the quality of life in society.

Therefore, each invention is responsible for generating more and more innovation in society, to the point where we know it today, where the digital revolution impacted the world and made it multicultural and globalized.

Find out more about technological developments here:

https://brainly.com/question/2437329

#SPJ1

One-half to two-thirds of the immigrants who migrated to the American colonies did so as indentured slaves. This is because starting a new life in the New World gave a glimpse of hope. In return for their passage, housing and food, lodging, and freedom dues, servants often worked anywhere from four to seven years. This is further explained below.

Generally, collectively, the workforce of a certain company or nation.

In conclusion, One-half to two-thirds of the immigrants who arrived in the American colonies as indentured slaves had a glimpse of hope for a better life in the New World. Passenger, housing, board, and freedom fees were often exchanged for four to seven years of service by servants.

Read more about the labor force

https://brainly.com/question/13962639

#SPJ1

The inference is that the statement that describes her approach to writing history is that Rhonda is writing social history or the history shaped by ordinary people.

An inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information given.

In this case, the inference is that the statement that describes her approach to writing history is that Rhonda is writing social history or the history shaped by ordinary people.

Learn more about inference on:

brainly.com/question/25280941

#SPJ1

Answer:

its probably bc

Explanation:

Answer:

true

Explanation:

just trust me

Answer:

The Treaty of Medina between Muslims, Arabs that were not Muslims, and Jews was formalised in writing and accepted by all parties. The historians have kept it. Although Muhammad (pbuh) was referred to in the Quran as God's Prophet and Messenger, it was known that the Jews did not have to accept this for their own religious beliefs.

Explanation:

hope this helps!!

Answer:

1. He suppressed free speech and other civil liberties

2. He fired and imprison many corrupt government officials

3. He established a land redistribution and reforms program

4. He invested in industrialization and modernization

Answer:

Historians use evidence from primary and secondary sources and oral histories to answer their questions. They have to choose what information is most important and trustworthy as evidence. Historical evidence is not always simple. Sometimes what historians thought to be true turns out to be false.

Explanation:

hope it will help you

Answer:

C. the leader of the group Young Italy

Europe dealt with a wide range of economic and political problems in the years following the First World War, most of which were unique to each nation's involvement in and aspirations during the war. People may today infer that Italy in particular was a country whose changes were a direct result of the political and economic impacts brought on by this battle. Therefore, it is crucial to consider how much the political and economic repercussions insured Mussolini and the Fascists' ascent to power while examining the many yet significant effects of WWI on Italy. So, even while the political consequences helped Mussolini consolidate his authority, it was the economic reforms that were actually necessary for Italy to enter its fascist age. First and foremost, Mussolini's rise to power was ensured by the political issues connected to the end of World War I. The fascist insurrection was heavily motivated by the post-war feeling of "Vittoria Mutilata" in Italy. This is due to the fact that, despite assuming the role of a victor, Italy's post-war liberal government, led by Prime Minister Orlando, was still threatened by its country's discontent with the fulfillment of the terms of the 1915 Treaty of London, as well as by past foreign policy humiliations in places like Ethiopia. With that, Italy made plans to renegotiate the territory exchanged under this pact, which precipitated the Fiume crisis. Simply told, this incident happened when Italian delegate D'Annuzio entered Fiume in an effort to topple it. The effort, however, was a failure since Orlando turned up control of the port to Yugoslavia. This contributed to Mussolini's ultimate ascent to power because it was believed that Orlando's left-leaning administration was unable to manage the intricacies of prior agreements and conflicts. As a result, the Italian government began to be seen as inefficient, leading citizens to seek shelter behind another system of governance in the face of their inevitable sense of damaged triumph. In this way, Mussolini's position as Italy's prime minister in 1922 had been developed since before Orlando's administration began addressing the national injustices brought on by the First World War. Thus, the possibility of a fascist-run Italy became a reality when the Prime Minister named Mussolini as the nation's new leader after attempting to impose martial rule. On the other hand, the effects of WWI on Italy’s economy were much more representative of the elements that allowed Mussolini to gain power than the aforementioned political ones. Case in point, consider the Fascist government’s decision to rebuild church-state relations with the Lateran Pacts (which was, in fact, one of the first measures introduced by the Fascist regime). Fundamentally, this pact – consisting of three key agreements – instituted the religious authority that Mussolini considered as crucial to the country’s national policies. For instance, religious figures could then participate in non-political activities, ensuring the Catholic community’s liberty to act as a secondary body to the Fascist administration. Overall, the Lateran Pacts prompted the support of a more extensive variety of people (e.g., Protestants, Orthodox), influencing Mussolini’s growing trajectory towards control. Most importantly, his economic plans are what primarily concretized the Fascist regime’s dominance in Italy – more so, as previously mentioned, than the political altercations. Essentially, Mussolini’s autarky (the economic plan) established, along with newly-conceived economic proposals, a nationwide sentiment of hope and pride that was, during the initial period of the post-war era, absent in civilian life. Specifically, this attitude was a product of nationalistic and patriotic allusions generated by the autarky. For example, the plan set to focus on grain production for the Fascists to attain their primary goal: let go of the necessity of external imports. Thereby, the inner production of grain allowed the new Italian government to disregard trade with other countries. Similarly, the economic plan proposed the Battle of the Lira – an idea focused on valuing the country’s currency in order to devalue Italian exports. With that, along with abolishing the need for trade and embellishing a newly-formed and desired national feeling, the plan acted upon the “Mussolini Law,” focused on the necessary land reforms in this system of government and, most prominently, economic ideology. In sum, Italy’s projects for their economy were essential to Mussolini’s rise to power; more than that, it was the most contributory factor.

The Revolution that did not take place at the same time as any other revolution was C. The American Revolution.

The United States led the way with the American Revolution from 1776 to 1783.

No other revolution took place during this time. The French and Haitian Revolutions ran concurrently and so did the Latin American and Mexican Wars of Independence.

Find out more on the Era of Revolutions at https://brainly.com/question/4229572.

#SPJ1

Answer:

because they didn't have to be paid and they could be put in harsher working conditions

Explanation:

Answer:

fish and shellfish

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Comments

Answer: don't try it. It is better to wage economic war, but that seems like a poor  idea to me. Russia's currency is in pretty good shape. Can you say the same about the American dollar?

This is largely because news reporting barely existed as we understand it today. Certainly, most ordinary people heard nothing about what was happening on other continents and were primarily interested in what was happening in their own, town/county/valley/etc, which is what was reported in the handbills and broadsheets of the time. Also, remember that it took around three months to cross the Atlantic, so news from the colonies travelled extremely slowly and was naturally superceded in relevence by more local news.

There were no news agencies at the time, and the publishers of handbills and broadsheets didn't keep any archives so there are very, very few examples of news reports left to study these days. Most of what survive are cartoons which were etched onto plates for printing (and there aren't many of those left), whereas printed media was temporary set-type which was re-set for the next printing.

This is why most of the historical record is from the political perspective, because Parliamentary sessions were recorded and political letters were archived. This is how we know that the tea taxes weren't a tax hike but a redistribution of where the tax liabilities fell.

It's also how we know that colonial taxes on most goods had consistently fallen for years, despite the crippling debt that the British treasury had sustained in their defence during the Seven Years War and the growing cost of maintaining their security in the subsequent years. It's how we know that the ensuring War of Independence wasn't a particularly popular war, with many MPs actively supporting the idea of giving the American colonies independence, partly for these economic reasons and partly out of support for the concepts of liberty which had been developing in Europe for almost a century and which had more recently crossed the Atlantic.

It's a fascinating bit of history. For America, the history is defined firstly by the need of the pre-Revolutionary factions to build a narrative to win support and later by the need for a unifying national myth to cement the new nation for the decades and centuries to come.

For Britain it was just another war, and a proxy one with France at that. It doesn't really have a lot of significance in the popular history of Britain, not because it was lost but because there are so many in Britain's history. While it wasn't insignificant (at all), it was a lot smaller and had much less of an effect on the course of British history than, say, the previous Seven Years War which it won and which also doesn't figure much in Britain's popular history, despite being the war that turned Britain into the first truly global power.