Answer:
No, it is not fair to let financial pressures determine how much we are willing to spend to promote justice and public safety.
Explanation:
No, it is not appropriate to let financial pressures ascertain how much we are willing to contribute to promoting justice and public security.
Spending on justice and public safety is an essential public expense, an expense that is needed to maintain the composition of our enlightened society. Let’s consider the example of a correctional institution. Such an institution works towards the restoration of offenders. These institutions have to struggle with unlawful justice bureaus for funding. They also have to struggle with social welfare divisions like education for funding.
Now correctional bureaus help in advancing justice and public safety. If funding is freed from the restraints of financial pressures then these bureaus will be necessary for supporting public security and supporting justice.
It is fair that financial pressures determine how much will be spent to promote justice and public safety. The consequences of the correction system must be taken into account to determine whether this system is too large. These consequences are more important than money.
Why is it fair that financial pressures determine spending on justice and public security?Justice and public security are financed with the payment of citizens' taxes.All citizens must contribute to this, as these are two essential elements for the good functioning of the country and good quality of life.However, given the country's income inequality, it is fair that the financial pressures of each determine how much each should contribute.Wealthier individuals, with less financial pressure, should contribute more money, while poorer citizens, with more financial pressure, should contribute less.This also promotes social justice, as it promotes a decrease in inequality in the country.
Regarding social justice, we can say that the correction system is very large and it spends a lot of public money, but we cannot ignore that the consequences of this system are much greater and cause very positive effects on society, which are more important than public spending.
More information on social inequality at the link:
https://brainly.com/question/937415
Everything you Already Know About Court Cases...
Everything you Already Know About Murder Trials…
based on the graph, how many kidneys do patients demand when the price is $0?
Answer:
20,000
Explanation:
What crime is committed by anyone (adult) who shall kill a child three years old?
Answer:
Pedicide
Explanation:
Pedicide means child homicideJeff and his coworkers frequently visit a local bar on their way home from their second-shift factory jobs. They are anxious to reach the bar on this particular night because their favorite NFL team is playing. Jeff hopes they will arrive in time to view the fourth quarter of the game. As he enters the bar, he notes a group of noisy, obnoxious rival fans who have had too many drinks. Jeff asks the group to quiet down so he can hear the game. He is immediately approached by members of the group who ask if he wants to make an issue of the game. Before Jeff can answer, one member of the group throws a punch. Within minutes, a full bar brawl ensues. Jeff ends up with a fractured skull, which results in brain damage. What type of lawsuit will Jeff be able to file against his aggressors
Answer:
Civil
Explanation:
A civil lawsuit is characterized as a judicial process where a person tries to hold another person responsible for an injury to which he or she was a victim, or for some unlawful act. In the case above, we can state that Jeff will try to hold his attacker responsible for the brain damage he has had. If Jeff wins the case, the attacker will have to compensate him for the amount that the court determines. The greater Jeff's damage, the greater the compensation.
The owner of the property has the right to establish
certain rules on their property that may or may not be
part of the criminal code.
O True
O False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
owner of the land has the right to make rules and kick people off the land if they dont listen to the rules
True, the owner of the property has the right to establish certain rules on their property that may or may not be part of the criminal code. Thus option (a) is correct.
What is criminal code?The criminal code or criminal law is a system of laws that is concerned with crimes and the punishment for the persons who commit crimes.
The criminal prosecution involves the government to decide whether to punish an individual for either an act or an omission.
The most of the state has its own criminal code. In a criminal prosecution or proceedings , the burden of proof lies with the government and has to establish every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
The owner of the property has the right to establish certain rules on their property that may or may not be part of the criminal code. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about criminal code here:
https://brainly.com/question/24706076
#SPJ2
With all of the fears surrounding the violation of workplace privacy, how do you approach the employee?
Answer:
calmly, quietly
Explanation:
I. Why the concern about workplace privacy? ... innumerable levels, clearly increase efficiency in almost all tasks, allow for geographic and other ... suits, and finally, what employees should and can be doing to protect their privacy while at work. ... Still, this fear provides an incentive for some companies who harbor important ...
Speed Component
itors If you were to design a vehicle feature that monitors
oncepts changes to the speed of the car, what scientific con-
cepts would you think about?
Answer:
xnznsjiwiw has to be a little bit nc
Body cams bring up the questions citizens have regarding police behavior. Ethics in criminal justice is most closely related to which of the following concepts?
a.justice
b.adjudication
c.investigation
d.corrections
Answer:
Justice
Explanation:
Body camera footage provides critical evidence for internal and external investigations of police conduct and offers community members a detailed, firsthand account of what happened during an encounter.
Ethics in criminal justice is most closely related to the concept of justice.
Ethics and criminal justice are closely related. One works with the other.
Criminal justice agents are those that are tasked with protecting and securing the citizens. And for that, citizens of a country give up certain rights and liberties to allow these agents to keep the community, society, safe. This is to ensure that the common man feels safe and secure to live life. Ethics refers to the principles that govern the standards or behavior of a person, deciding what is morally good or bad. And in that regard, when police personnel is equipped with bodycams to not only monitor or record what the police forces are doing. But this feature was also to ensure that whatever happens is kept on record. So, if any 'error' happens, then there can be proof of what happened and not just 'witness accounts', be it from the police or the public. This bodycam feature acts as evidence of what happened, presenting the truth. This shows that ethics in criminal behavior is most clearly related to the concept of justice.Criminal justice means that even criminals or suspects are allowed or given the chance to prove their innocence and given justice. But at the same time, ethics provides police agents with principles that ensure they act according to the law. This is when bodycams come into use, providing evidence or proof of what happens in cases of 'incidents' or 'unlawful arrests'. Thus, the correct answer is option a.
Learn more about criminal justice here:
brainly.com/question/19585440
que mexicano ilustre propuso que las naciones debian dialogar para abanzar a sia un desarme y la paz en una etapa de la historia en que los paises competian por tener el mejor y mas completo armamento de guerra?".
Answer:
Alfonso Garcia Robles.
Explanation:
Alfonso Garcia Robles fue el primer mexicano en recibir un premio Nobel de la Paz por su rol en el Tratado de Tlatelolco el cual prohibía que los países de América Latina fabriquen, almacenen o prueben armas nucleares haciendo que esta no estuviera ligada a conflictos entre Estados Unidos de América y la Unión Soviética, quienes pujaban por la disputa del poder económico, político y militar en diferentes sectores del mundo. A su vez, Alfonso Garcia Robles propuso que las naciones deben dialogar para avanzar hacia un desarme y la paz en las Sesiones Especiales para el Desarme de la Asamblea General de la ONU.
The Constitution gives each branch of government different powers through checks and balances
and separation of powers. Define both checks and balances and separation of powers, and
explain why you think it is important for our government to have both of these.
Answer: Its important for the branches of government to have these because it stops one branch from being too powerful and allows the branches to keep watch on one another
Explanation: for example congress passes a law but the supreme court finds it unconstitutional example of separation of power and checks and balances
These are crucial for the government's branches to have because they prevent one branch from becoming overly dominant and enable the branches to keep an eye on one another.
What is separation of powers?The founding fathers included the "separation of powers" principle into their ideas for the American government as a result of their reading of Enlightenment political philosophy. Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron of Montesquieu, coined the phrase "separation of powers." (Most often, he is simply referred to as "Montesquieu. The Spirit of the Laws, a significant work of political theory he wrote, was published in 1748.
In his discussion of the best ways for governments to operate, Montesquieu argued that the executive, legislative, and judicial powers of the government should be distributed among its various branches so that no one individual.
Thus, they prevent one branch from becoming overly dominant
For more details about separation of powers, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12108126
#SPJ5
PLEASE HELP ASAP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
What was significant about the decision made by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Nixon?
Question 8 options:
It meant that the president was protected from investigations by a special prosecutor.
It signified that the president could not tape conversations with advisors in the White House.
It forever changed the way that a president appoints a vice president.
It demonstrated that even a president is subject to the law.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
im big brained
Which function of government do you think is most important. Explain
Answer: Assuming international recognition and relative peace, the most important function of government are ensure public order and provide means for conflict solving. The other functions can be covered by people or the private sector (how effectively is a question that remains unanswered) but only the State should have an army or a police force and only the state can provide for a legal system and a political system in the national level.
Explanation:
The important function of government is "to ensure national security". A further explanation is provided below.
A means of administering organizational norms including determining policies is considered a system of government.The government however is important to strengthen a community of individuals together into the societal structure, a nationality that would be widely recognized by those of a similar kind.
Learn more about the function of government here:
https://brainly.com/question/17166802
State law of gravitational force
Answer:
Explanation:
Newton's law of gravitation, statement that any particle of matter in the universe attracts any other with a force varying directly as the product of the masses and inversely as the square of the distance between them.
If you are deaf and communicate with sign language: Question 5 options: You may bring an interpreter with you to the Knowledge and/or Road Test You may request that PennDOT provide an interpreter for the Knowledge and/or Road Test You may not get a PA Learner's Permit or License You are exempt from having to take the Knowledge and Road Test to get a PA Driver's License.
Answer:
If you are deaf and communicate with sign language:
You may request that PennDOT provide an interpreter for the Knowledge and/or Road Test
Explanation:
It is the responsibility of public institutions to provide an interpreter if a deaf person must communicate with sign language. However, it seems that payment for the service must be borne by the person requesting for the service. The request must be placed two weeks in advance to ensure that necessary arrangements are made for the purpose. Only certified and registered sign language interpreters are allowed for the Knowledge and/or Road Test.
True or False. A police officer pointing his weapon at someone is not considered
deadly force.
True
False
Which level of government establish and implement educations requirements for minors?
I
U.S. Government
II
Government of the State of Florida
III
County and Municipal governments
Answer:
Explanation:
The US government did
Question #2
Multiple Choice
How many local, county, state, and federal law enforcement agencies are in operation in the United States?
O 650,000
O 65,000
may
O 650
O 16,500
In Parker's lawsuit against Mark, the jury returns a verdict in Mark's favor. Shortly thereafter, the judge learns that Mark had engaged in misconduct during the trial by bribing two of the jurors in exchange for their convincing the other jurors to decide the case in Mark's favor. If requested by Parker, the judge would likely grant a motion:
Answer:
For a mistrial
Explanation:
Under the British colonial policy of "salutary neglect" British laws restricting the colonies were which of the following selections?
Answer:
during the "salutary neglect" British laws restricting colonies were poorly enforced
Explanation:
British laws on it's North American colonies restricted the colonies from having to trade with non British colonies and also other countries other than Britain. but these trade regulations was poorly enforced from the early to mid 18th century under then chief minister ROBERT WALPOLE as long as the colonies remained loyal and contributed to the economic growth of the Britain
Genie's company is considering building an annex to its main factory. While deciding on the project, the board of directors discusses the impact the the annex would have on the local community, shareholders, company profits, and nearby landowners.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Determine which moral standard of social responsibility the business is observing. Genie's company is considering building an annex to its main factory. While deciding on the project, the board of directors discusses the impact the the annex would have on the local community, shareholders, company profits, and nearby landowners.
Answer:
Stakeholder Theory
Explanation:
Stakeholder theory refers to the ability that a project promoted by a company, institution or person, has to impact other systems and people around it, at the same time, which analyzes the impact it will take for itself. We can see an example of this in the question above, where the company Genie wants to build an attachment in its main plant, but is evaluating how that attachment will influence and impact all systems that are related to the company such as local community, shareholders, company profits and owners of nearby lands.
You are working to design a map each area you are designing will take up to 10 hours to make how many hours will it take you to design 7 areas
Answer:
It would take 70 hours to design 7 areas
Explanation:
7 × 10
Which of the following protects the interests and legal rights of both parties involved in an agreement?
ОА.
Assets
OB.
Consumer protection
OC.
Contracts
OD.
Consumer law
Answer:
It would be a Contract.This is a legally binding agreement which protects both parties from any negligence and malpractice when performing business related issues.The Constitution grants the federal government several financial, which include the_____, ____, and___. Even though federal government is given certain powers, its power is limited by the____and____. These amendments prohibit the national government from depriving any person of____, ____, or without due process of____.
Answer:
Powers; spending power; banking power; taxing power; fifth amendment; fourteenth amendment; liberty; life; property; law.
Explanation:
A constitution refers to a set of written laws and principles which is typically used to determine the power and authority of the government, as well as guarantee the fundamental rights of its citizens. In the United States of America, the federal government has various powers granted by Acts of Congress and Article II of the U.S constitution such as Ordinance power, Appointment power, Implied power, Executive power, Financial power etc.
Hence, the Constitution grants the federal government several financial powers, which include the spending power, banking power, and taxing power. Even though federal government is given certain powers, its power is limited by the fifth amendment and fourteenth amendment. These amendments prohibit the national government from depriving any person of liberty, life, or property without due process of law.
The 5th and 14th Amendment is an amendment to the constitution of the United States of America and they address the issue of civil and legal rights for the African American citizens and slaves who had gained freedom after the American Civil War. The 14th Amendment is made up of the clause known as the equal protection of the laws.
Todd let his 10 year old daughter julie drive the family car while she was driving she turned her head to say something to her friend in the back seat and swearved off the road the car hit and distroyed a mailbox and damaged a fence who is liaable for the damages
Todd, as he permitted his underage daughter to use a vehicle. The legal age to receive a driver's license and legally operate a motor vehicle on public roads is known as the minimum driving age.
What was the minimum age of driving ?The legal drinking age is set by each jurisdiction and is often set at 18, though under strict supervision, trainee drivers may be allowed to drive sooner. The person seeking the license would typically be tested for driving prowess and understanding of traffic laws before being awarded a licence, assuming he or she is over the minimum driving age.
This would happen before achieving the requisite age for a driver's license or anytime later. places where the driving age is the lowest (17 and below)include Australia, The Bahamas, Canada, Malaysia, New Zealand, United States, Zimbabwe, and the United Kingdom (Mainland). Drivers can be as young as 14 in several areas in the United States and Canada (with parental supervision)
Learn more about driving age here
https://brainly.com/question/16740116
#SPJ5
1. The Catholic Church is
because,
through the unbroken line of bishops and
popes, we can trace her history back to
the Apostles.
Those are the options in the picture for the question pls help?
This is actually religion not law sorry there is no topic for that
Answer: Apostolic
Explanation:
The Catholic Church is the oldest, largest and most powerful Christian denomination there is. Their roots can be traced back to the Roman Empire which was the government when Jesus Christ was born on Earth.
Members of the Catholic Church believe that they are the one true Apostolic Church because their leadership can be traced back to the Apostles of Jesus Christ with the first Pope being St. Peter himself.
PLEASE HELP ASAP
Which situation shows the president acting as head of state?
Question 7 options:
sending troops into combat
appointing members of the cabinet
delivering a budget to Congress
awarding a medal to a war hero
Answer:appointing members of cabinet
Answer:
The answer is (B) (appointing members of the cabinet)
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
If you were to design a vehicle feature that monitors changes to the mass of the car, what scientific concepts would you think about
Answer:
Maybe I would add a automatic emergency brake and alert driver when sleeping mode
Explanation:
HURRY PLEASE You pay $38.76 for a phone case, a selfie-stick, and 2 USB drives. The phone case costs $14.29 and the selfie-stick costs $10.49. The USB drives cost the same amount. How much does each USB drive cost
Answer:
$0.78 i think
Explanation:
Answer:
12.235
Explanation:
BECAUSE
In 1988, as a result of a general election, Arizona added Article XXVIII to its constitution, Article XXVIII provided that English was to be the official language of the state and required all state officials and employees to use only the English language during the performance of government business. Maria-Kelly, an employee of the Arizona Department of Administration, frequently spoke in Spanish to Spanish-speaking persons with whom she dealt in the course of her work. Maria claimed that Article XXVIII violated constitutionally protected free speech rights and brought an action in federal court against the state governor, Rose Mofford, and other state officials. Does Article XXVIII violate the freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Answer:
Yes. Article XXVIII of the Arizona constitution is a violation of Maria-Kelly's freedom of speech as enshrined in the first amendment to the US Constitution.
Explanation:
The first amendment to the constitution guarantees Maria-Kelly freedom of speech. Therefore, to force Maria-Kelly not to speak Spanish to some Spanish-speaking persons with whom she dealt in the course of her work is an abridgment of her right to self-expression. Conclusively, Article XXVIII clearly violated her constitutionally protected free speech rights.
1. Identify five similarities that you see between the rights contained in the UN document
and the fundamental rights of United States citizens from the US Bill of Rights discussed in
Lesson 3.
2. Identify five rights from the UN articles that you would like to add to a list of guarantees
under the US Constitution.
3. Are any rights that you believe should be included but that are missing from either the US
Bill of Rights or the UN Declaration of Human Rights? Give at least two to three rights.
1. The most obvious similarity between the two documents is their intended purpose. Both of these Bills of Rights are expressly designed to amend the constitution of each nation and act as a living document to spell out various legal matters, particularly rights and liberties.
2. The UN upholds the same 5 basic rights such as: speech, religion, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.
3. Democracy, based on the rule of law, is ultimately a means to achieve international peace and security, economic and social progress and development, and respect for human rights – the three pillars of the United Nations mission as set forth in the UN Charter. At the 2005 World Summit, all the world’s governments reaffirmed “that democracy is a universal value based on the freely expressed will of people to determine their own political, economic, social and cultural systems and their full participation in all aspects of their lives” and stressed “that democracy, development, and respect for all human rights and fundamental freedoms are interdependent and mutually reinforcing”. Democratic principles are woven throughout the normative fabric of the United Nations. The 2009 Guidance Note on Democracy of the Secretary-General sets out the United Nations framework for democracy based on universal principles, norms and standards and commits the Organization to principled, coherent, and consistent action in support of democracy.
The correct set of striking similarities between the rights of the UN document and the fundamental rights of the citizens of the US are that under Freedom, Petition, Amendment of the constitution.
These three similarities are found in not only the rights of the UN and the US but in most of the countries' following the way of constitutional governance.
Fundamental Rights The fundamental rights of the articles include freedom of speech, freedom of movement, right to press, right to information, right to conduct business, etc. These rights are universally applicable and contained in the documents of most of the countries and also in the UN document. US follows constitutional democracy in its governance, and it enables that the rights can be amended and revoked by the Supreme Court at any such time it may deem fit.Hence, the rights as mentioned above in the paraphrase are the similar fundamental rights contained in the UN documents as well as the Bill of Rights as per US Constitution.
Learn more about fundamental rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/1261546