do you think the effect of the Spanish American war were beneficial or detrimental to the United states?

Answer:

a legally recognized subject or national of a state or commonwealth, either native or naturalized is called citizen

Explanation:

Women living in England's North American colonies were generally expected to obey their husbands and closely follow social norms. Thus, option C is correct.

A "colony" is a group of people who are living together in a foreign country. These colonies are set up in a foreign country, and these people use the resources that are available over there.

In the North American colonies, a large proportion of the women who were living in England were bound by social norms and regulations and had to live in that way or manner.

This also suggests obeying the decisions that the husband made. Therefore, option C is the correct option.

Learn more about colony, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13673860

#SPJ1

Answer:

C

Explanation:

The following are the different systems of measuring time:-

Gregorian calendar

Today’s internationally accepted calendar is called the Gregorian calendar. It is also called the Western calendar. It is a solar calendar in which a year has 12 months divided into 365 days. The leap year comes once in four years which has 366 days.

Jewish calendar

It is commonly called Hebrew calendar. It is used by the religious community of Jews. It is lunisolar calendar - it is regulated by the positions of the sun and the moon.

Muslim calendar

It is also called Hijri calendar or Islamic calendar. It is based on the movement of the moon. It consists of 12 lunar months.

Traditional Chinese calendar

It is a combined solar-lunar calendar. It has 12 months in which each month has 29 or 30 days.

Maya calendar

It is a system of three different dating calendars. It is used by the several cultures in Central America.

To know more about calendar here

https://brainly.com/question/4657906

#SPJ1

The Revolution opened new markets and new trade relationships. The Americans' victory also opened the western territories for invasion and settlement, which created new domestic markets. Americans began to create their own manufacturers, no longer content to reply on those in Britain.

The Russian Revolution marked the end of the Russian monarchy. The Bols-hevik revolutionaries overthrew the monarchy during the Russian Revolution of 1917, putting an end to the Romanov dynasty.

The complete family of Czar Nich-olas II, including his young children It didn't work well during World War I, though, which sparked the Russian Revolution. The monarchy was abolished in 1917 with the Nich-olas II's abdication. The Bols-heviks took control of the Russian monarchy during the October Revolution, starting the Russian Civil War, and were later put to death by the Bolshevik forces. We acknowledge that the Grand Du-ke Vladimir Kirill-ovich.

To learn more about monarchy, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/3458331

#SPJ1

Answer:

the Russian Revolution

Explanation:

The answer above is correct.

The two sides of the American Revolution differed primarily in whether they believed the 13 colonies should be an independent nation or not. They also differed on the nature of government.

The American Revolution become an ideological and political revolution that came about in British the united states between 1765 and 1791. The Americans in the thirteen Colonies shaped independent states that defeated the British within the American progressive war (1775–1783), gaining independence from the British Crown and establishing us of us because the first nation-state was based on Enlightenment ideas of liberal democracy. American colonists objected to being taxed with the aid of the Parliament of excellent Britain, a body wherein they had no direct illustration. Earlier than the 1760s, Britain's American colonies had enjoyed a high level of autonomy of their internal affairs, which had been domestically ruled by means of colonial legislatures.

Learn more about  American Revolution here

https://brainly.com/question/18317211

#SPJ4

Answer:

*This is personal preference*

Feel free to sub out words and change stuff, but this is just an example of what you could write.

I would write something along the lines of:

Rome became a political and economical powerhouse over the course of [x] years. Christianity/ money heavily influenced this empire's political climate as shown in/ demonstrated by [reference example from earlier paragraph]. From a historical standpoint, Rome was en route to becoming the most prosperous empire in the world, but too much focus on [insert] led to its downfall.  Rome may not have been built in a day, but these examples have demonstrated that it could be burned in one. (last sentence is a reference to a fire, but could be elaborated on)

Explanation:

So as you start to write more and more essays, sometimes you'll find that it's better to actually veer away from listing out topics all at once, and writing something that grabs attention (as an intro) and really drives home a point in the conclusion.

I think that summarizing a little bit of your intro is good (not the main thing you should do), but also hitting good keynotes through the content you wrote in the BODY is valuable and then wrapping everything up with something that is relevant but clever, such as a play on a common phrase or providing food for thought.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

The anwser is Pakistan.

Answer: Society.

Explanation:

I don't have one, apologies.  

Answer:

A multi-domed cathedral at the heart of a Russian city.

A citizen cannot be tried twice for the same crime according to double jeopardy.

Double jeopardy, in regulation, protection towards the use through the country of certain a couple of sorts of prosecution. In preferred, nations watching the rule of thumb of double jeopardy, someone cannot be tried two times for the same crime based on the same behavior.

The Double Jeopardy Clause inside the 5th modification to the American constitution prohibits all of us from being prosecuted twice for considerably the equal crime. The relevant part of the 5th change states, "No man or woman shall be in the situation for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life.

So we can conclude that citizens cannot be charged for a serious crime twice in double jeopardy.

Learn more about Double Jeopardy here: https://brainly.com/question/12229144

#SPJ1

Options are the following:

A citizen cannot be indicted before being tried for a serious crime.

A citizen cannot be forced to testify to a crime.

A citizen cannot be forced to testify for more than one day in court.

A citizen cannot be tried twice for the same crime.

The too-ambitious maritime development of Rome during its time in the Mediterranean. enabled Hannibal to start a third war against the Romans.

Generally, During the Middle Reign of the Roman Empire, which lasted from 263 to 133 BCE, there was a time of Roman expansion throughout the Mediterranean.

The Punic Conflicts were fought between Rome and its enemy Carthage during this period of time. Each of these wars lasted three years. As a direct consequence of these wars, significant changes were made to the Roman military as well as the administrative structure of the state.

Rome emerged victorious from all three of the Punic Wars (also known as the Phoenician Wars) and took control of the western Mediterranean. The First Punic War (264-241 B.C.)

In conclusion, Rome's citizen-soldiers finally prevailed against Carthage's mercenaries, primarily on the island of Sicily and in the Mediterranean Sea, where most of the fighting took place (hired foreign soldiers).

Read more about Rome's rapid expansion

https://brainly.com/question/10544712

#SPJ1

Repairing some of the harm caused by humans and preserving the environment for future generations are the two basic goals of conservation. to preserve species variety for both human and wildlife benefit. to offer possibilities for learning and environmental enjoyment.

Cost is a major drawback of an environmental strategy because money is needed to put it into action. 2) A policy would be a failure if the public did not support it. On occasion, though, the public's reaction can be harsh, as in the case of safeguarding a natural region where a lot of people depend.

Conservation enables us to prevent the extinction of species as well. but support protecting the environment in which we ourselves live. The drawback is that we don't have a lot of resources. Additionally, deciding where to direct our efforts can be challenging.

Learn more about environmental Preservation here:

https://brainly.com/question/14398500

#SPJ1

Match the following:

farmed the land and gave part of the produce to higher ranked people - nobles

controlled the land and ruled the manor - serfs

received land in exchange for protecting the manor - Knights

legitimized the king's power by saying the power came from divine right - church

A farmer or labourer known as a vassal under a feudal system received a plot of land in exchange for serving a lord or king, particularly during wartime. In exchange for their own fiefs, or parcels of land, vassals were expected to carry out a variety of tasks.

Unfree labour and homesteads were the two main features of feudal society in Marx's view. Eastern European corvée served as a representation of the former (labor service). These latter ones served as locations for the reproduction of labour. On their demesne, surplus labour was carried out as instructed by the lord.

To learn more about federal society visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4761264

#SPJ13

At the end of the Period in the 7th century, Western civilisation centred around three great civilisations: the Byzantine, the Islamic, and Charlemagne's Empire. The history of these three civilisations through the 11th century is characterized by rivalries and interactions between them, each of which preserved different aspects of the legacy they inherited.

The Byzantines spoke Greek and combined the imperial tradition of the Roman world with intense Christianity. Religious controversies sometimes spilt over into politics for the simple reason that the emperor represented the highest power of church and state.

The Islamic world was different as it was Arabic speaking and the most cosmopolitan of the three civilisations. Also, like the Byzantine Empire, Islam helped to preserve and transmit the classical heritage of learning. Our knowledge of Plato, Aristotle and others was not only preserved by Islamic scholars but was also enriched at the same time.

In Charlemagne's Empire, the situation is quite different. While Byzantine and Islam were building civilisations of great material wealth and internal dynamism, Charlemagne was rebuilding after the fall of Rome.

Learn more about the three heirs of Rome here:

https://brainly.com/question/498785

#SPJ4

Hamilton claims the judiciary has no influence over either “sword” or “purse” and there is no a claim for explaining whether there is any way in which the judiciary could potentially influence the “sword” or the “purse” as they do not influence.

The judiciary has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and might take no active resolution no matter. it's going to actually be aforementioned to possess neither FORCE nor can, however simply judgment. As mentioned in the The Federalist Papers, No. 78.

The Executive not solely dispenses the honors, however holds the sword  of the community. The assembly not solely commands the purse, however prescribes the foundations by that the duties and rights of each citizen are to be regulated.

To learn more about Hamilton here

brainly.com/question/8501373

#SPJ1

Answer: do you have any multiple choice answers?

Explanation:

Answer:

The British probably felt entitled to tax the colonists because, after all, it WAS the colonists who provoked the war. After the Declaration of Independence, they probably felt very cross.

Explanation:

Nonetheless, slavery received vital protections within the charter. The infamous three-fifths clause—which counted three-fifths of a kingdom's slave population in apportioning representation—gave the South greater representation inside the house of Representatives and additional votes inside the Electoral college.

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime whereof the celebration shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the united states, or any location problem to their jurisdiction.

Eventually, the Compromise of 1850 banned the slave exchange in Washington, D.C. The hotly debated Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 completely repealed or reversed, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 in the sense that states may want to decide if they desired to uphold slavery within their own borders or now not.

Learn more about the constitution here: https://brainly.com/question/453546

#SPJ4

Answer:

1. It will create inconsistencies with convention rights – leading to more cases going to Strasbourg

The bill removes the requirement for courts to consider how rights have been interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) when reaching a decision.

The government states that this is necessary for courts to be able to give greater weight to national law and the national context.

However, evidence shows they already give great weight to this and do not treat ECtHR jurisprudence as binding.

If UK courts do not even consider how convention rights are developing in other countries, our human rights laws could become not only inconsistent with those in the rest of Europe, but also less clear and transparent.

As well as placing people in the UK at a disadvantage compared with their European counterparts, this would cause difficulties for those that operate across borders such as businesses – ultimately harming our national competitiveness.

To what extent will the bill of rights ‘bring decisions back’ to the UK?

Many of the changes will leave UK courts unable to play their usual role in addressing incompatibilities between UK law and the convention.

This makes it almost inevitable that more cases will therefore have to go to the ECtHR.

This is the opposite of the government’s intention. It would also be more expensive for all parties and could result in damage to the UK’s international reputation.

2. It creates delays and limits the role of the courts in protecting rights

One of the most significant changes made is the removal of the section 3 HRA requirement for courts to interpret legislation compatibly with convention rights.

Section 3 is one of the core parts of the HRA framework.

It has played a significant role in ensuring that laws are applied in a way that is compatible with human rights in the first place and that courts can resolve issues quickly when they do arise.

Without it, courts will be forced to issue more declarations of incompatibility, which refers the matter back to government and parliament to resolve through legislation.

This will increase burdens on parliamentary time making long delays likely, during which the violation of rights would be ongoing.

What happens to existing judgments?

There is also a question over what happens to the existing judgments courts have made using section 3, as one reading of the bill suggests these will all cease to have legal force overnight.

The more likely interpretation is that they will still be applicable for now, but will be vulnerable to being overturned in future cases.

Either way, there will be a lot of confusion for courts, solicitors and everyone who comes into contact with human rights law about whether, or how far, these judgments will apply.

The secretary of state’s discretion

There is also a power created for the secretary of state to ‘save’ the effect of some of the existing section 3 judgments – but this gives them a broad and perhaps unprecedented discretion over rights issues.

It would make a minister (rather than parliament) the sole determiner of which protections should be kept.

3. It will prevent courts from ordering the government to take positive steps to protect rights

All human rights contain two types of obligations that public bodies (including governments) must comply with:

‘negative’ obligations, which require them to respect or refrain from violating rights, and

‘positive’ obligations, which require them to take steps to fulfil a right

Positive obligations have been important in raising human rights standards and ensuring those that have been failed by public bodies can access justice.

They’ve been used to secure improvements in areas such as:

violence against women and girls

disability services

investigations of deaths in state custody

modern slavery

However, the bill would prevent courts from imposing any new positive obligations on a public body – leaving us with only half the protections for human rights that other countries who are signed up to the convention have.

This again would likely see more people having to go to the ECtHR to protect their rights.

4. It adds an extra hurdle to human rights cases – making it harder to access justice

The bill will introduce an additional permission stage for human rights cases.

This risks:

preventing people from enforcing their rights

blocking the constitutional role of the courts in upholding these, and

significantly reducing government accountability

The government says this measure is supposed to preserve parliamentary sovereignty, but we do not believe this has been shown to be necessary.

Judges are experts in applying the law to the facts of individual cases in an impartial way, and the evidence shows that they are careful to respect the democratic legitimacy of parliament.

That is only a few reasons I hope this helps! Please vote for Brainliest!

France and Great Britain both define their territorial boundaries and trade relations with Ohio Indians Protect Canada Continue to only do business with Indians and enlarge the area of North America.

Their primary methods of transportation were the waterways. It was necessary for the French to control American Indian trade in the Ohio River Valley and keep Pennsylvanian merchants at bay. Additionally, they want the presence of the American Indians there as collaborators. The French, unlike the British, had no intention of settling in the Ohio River Valley.

To retain ownership of their territory and the future of their culture, the American Indians fought. The Upper Ohio River Valley was claimed by France. They desired to rule the region and engage in trade with the American Indians. The Upper Ohio River Valley was also under British control.

To know more about France and Britain: https://brainly.com/question/25651751

#SPJ1

Answer:

First person

Explanation:

Diary entrys use ¨me¨, ¨I¨, ¨my¨ which are all first person.

Answer:

First person

Explanation:

El Escorial is the royal palace of the Spanish monarchs. Thus, option 'C' is the correct option.

Central Spain's San Lorenzo de El Escorial, close to Madrid, is home to the enormous architectural complex known as The Escorial. The structure is the most significant example of Spanish Renaissance architecture. El Escorial's building process started in 1563 and was completed in 1584.

King Philip II created the concept because he desired a structure that could serve as a palace, a Hieronymite monastery, and a place of interment for his father, Holy Roman Emperor Charles V. The building's patron saint, San Lorenzo, was crucified on a grill, therefore the initial architect, Juan Bautista de Toledo, modelled the ground plan after that.

Learn more about El Escorial, here:

https://brainly.com/question/18986608

#SPJ1

Simple Answer:

C

just want points

The statement " The Treaty of Tordesillas allowed Italy Response area to colonize lands west of the treaty line."  is False.

The newly discovered territories outside of Europe were divided between the Portuguese Empire and the Spanish Empire along a meridian 370 leagues west of the Cape Verde islands, off the west coast of Africa, by the Treaty of Tordesillas, which was signed in Tordesillas, Spain on June 7, 1494, and authenticated in Setbal, Portugal.

The "New World" was cleanly partitioned into territory, riches, and inhabitants that were claimed by Spain and Portugal by this Treaty. The division is symbolised by the red vertical line running through eastern Brazil.

To learn more about Treaty of Tordesillas, refer

https://brainly.com/question/24756289

#SPJ1

Henry Ford affect diversity in Detroit diversity increased because Ford hired immigrants from many different countries. The correct option is A.

Around the turn of the 20th century, Detroit and its surrounding areas had a lot to offer the developing auto industry. There was plenty of timber in Michigan itself, and iron ore could be found in the Minnesotan Mesabi Range.

Henry Ford was driven to create a car that was straightforward, dependable, and affordable—a car that the typical American worker could afford. The Model T and the assembly line, two inventions that transformed American society and helped shape the world we live in today, were the results of this commitment.

Learn more about Henry Ford here:

https://brainly.com/question/26814868

#SPJ1

1. Changes made by Liu bang :

- Some of the changes that Liu bang made during his reign were that he  lowered taxes and corvée, promoted Confucianism, and put down uprisings by the lords of non-Liu vassal nations. He also started the heqin policy to keep the Han Empire and the Xiongnu at peace de facto following the defeat at the Battle of Baideng in 200 BCE.

2. The changes in farming were important :

- Changes in farming were crucial because the population of China increased significantly, creating a need for or accelerating the production of more food.

3. The fall of the Former Han Dynasty :

- The fighting between warlords caused the Han Empire to fall apart quite fast. The first was Cao Cao, who attempted to unite China but eventually failed while under control of the young ruler Xian. The Han Dynasty came to an end when Emperor Xian was forced to abdicate following the death of Cao Cao in 220 CE.

4. The former Han Dynasty was brought down by :

- When Cao Pi, Cao Cao's son and heir, forced Emperor Xian to abdicate in favor of himself, the Han dynasty officially came to an end in 220. Cao Wei, a new state, elected Cao Pi as its ruler.

5. The ultimate end of the Han Dynasty :

- The Han dynasty came to an end when the puppet emperor Xian was forced to abdicate in 220. Until then, he had managed to stay on.

To know more about the Han Dynasty, kindly click on the link below :

https://brainly.com/question/15198666?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ9

Answer:

According to the Bible Dictionary:

"symbolizes death, burial, and resurrection, and can only be done by immersion"

To describe Russia's climate effectively, we must conduct thorough research in reliable sources such as books and scientific articles.

The country is mostly in a temperate and polar climate zone. There are also vegetations of taiga, tundra and steppes.

In European Russia, there is the humid continental climate and steppes in the south. In the subarctic and Siberia there is a tundra climate in the polar north. In the country, summers are usually hot in the steppes and colder in the Arctic. Winters are usually colder and with extreme conditions in the polar north.

Therefore, Russia's climate can be comfortable at some times of the year and extreme at others, with this country being considered one of the coldest in the world, with an average annual temperature of up to minus 3.64°C.

Find out more about Russia on:

https://brainly.com/question/2333633

#SPJ1