The character analysis of Judge Danforth in the book The Crucible is a man who is rigid with the law and also very intelligent, well respected and successful and believes himself to be fair.
What is Character Analysis?This refers to the close examination of the action and words of a character in order to make a profile of what type of person the character is and how their character helps to advance the plot.
Hence, it can be seen that the main conflict of the book The Crucible is all about the false allegation of witchcraft made against many people which saw many innocents being sentenced to death.
Read more about The Crucible here:
https://brainly.com/question/26121334
#SPJ1
Refer to explorations in literature for a complete version of the speech. How does churchill use rhetoric to advance his purpose in this section of "the sinews of peace"?.
In Churchill's speech, some rhetoric was used to explain his intentions and goals, namely to rejoice over the victory and the end of the war, but we still have to work hard for the future.
Rhetoric in Churchill's SpeechesExactly 72 years ago or May 8, 1945, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill delivered a speech that officially ended the war with Germany. He emphasized that the British and German ceasefire had been signed the previous day in the city of Rheims, France, at 02.41 local time.
"Right now we are rejoicing over the victory and the end of the war, but we still have to work hard for the future. It is undeniable, we must continue our task for our beloved country."
Rhetoric is a branch of dialectics that discusses the ability to make arguments in language as a tool in the field of ethics. Rhetoric is a persuasion technique using persuasion to produce good persuasion of the speaker's character, emotion, or argument.
Learn more about Churchill's speech: https://brainly.com/question/25495942
#SPJ4
Which prediction is best supported by Mrs.hale speech and actions
The prediction that is best supported by Mrs. Hale's speech and actions is this:
Mrs. Hale will hide the evidence from the men.What prediction is best supported by the action of Mrs. Hale?The play Trifles by Susan Glaspell tells us the story of a young woman who killed her husband. The men who consisted of the inspectors and the husbands of Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters were present at the scene where the crime had occurred.
As they searched for evidence that would have convicted Mrs. Wright, we can see that the women found evidence of the dead bird that showed that Mrs. Wright had actually killed her husband. When asked, she conceals her hands in her pocket to hide the evidence.
Because of the hurtful manner in which the men spoke to the women, Mrs. Hale remained determined to conceal the evidence because she believed that Mr. Wright deserved his death for being mean. This is evident in her speech and actions.
Complete Question:
Read this excerpt from the end of Susan Glaspell’s play Trifles. Which prediction is best supported by Mrs. Hale's speech and actions? COUNTY ATTORNEY: (facetiously) Well, Henry, at least we found out that she was not going to quilt it. She was going to—what is it you call it, ladies? MRS HALE: (her hand against her pocket) We call it—knot it, Mr. Henderson. Mrs. Hale will reveal the motive to her husband. Mrs. Hale will hide the evidence from the men. Mrs. Hale will finish Mrs. Wright's quilt. Mrs. Hale will leave the dead bird in the house.
Learn more about Mrs. Hale here:
https://brainly.com/question/28351157
#SPJ1
When the piano that Rose Mary wanted ends up in the backyard, Rose Mary says, “Most pianists never get the chance to play in the great out-of-doors, and now the whole neighborhood can enjoy the music too” (53). What does this tell us about Rose Mary’s character? From the glass castle
What the above statement tells us about Rose Mary is that she sees the positive sides of things. Unlike others who tend to see the negative sides of matters, Rose Mary portrayed the positive things.
What describes the personality of Rose Mary?From her statement above, Roe Mary can be aptly described as an optimistic individual who sought the bright sides of things.
Instead of becoming sad at the fact that the piano she wanted ended up in the backyard, she was able to acknowledge that most pianists do not ever get the chance to play in the great out-doors and now the entire neighborhood can also enjoy the music. So, Rose Mary was positive.
Learn more about the glass castle here:
https://brainly.com/question/7575146
#SPJ1
once we write down our experiences, they serve as a form of personal research and can enhance our credibility. a. true b.false
Yes, it is true that once we write down our experiences, they serve as a form of personal research and can enhance our credibility.
Whenever we get a chance to visit a new place or to experience a new thing, then we should write it down in our own record book. After sometime, when we get time to read our record book, then we can have the feeling of accomplishment of some tasks and experiences that we always wanted to have.
Recording each day is not practically possible but yes we should do it occasionally. We should record our very special moments. It serves as a form of our personal research. It eventually increases our credibility.
To know more about research here
https://brainly.com/question/24174276
#SPJ4
when descartes reasons that it is conceivable that he could exist without his body and that whatever is conceivable is logically possible he is offering_____ .
When Descartes reasons that it is conceivable that he could exist without his body and that whatever is conceivable is logically possible he is offering a divisibility argument.
What is an Argument?This refers to the use of words to try and convince and persuade a person about a line of reasoning or point of view through logic or rhetoric.
Hence, it can be seen that when Rene Descartes talked about the mind and the body and how they were different and how she could exist without her body and that whatever is conceivable, she was making an argument for divisibility of the mind and body.
Read more about Rene Descartes here:
https://brainly.com/question/838565
#SPJ1
helppp plsssss
can you please help me with this?
What figurative language is I was a human punching bag?
Answer:
I was a punching bag is a metaphor because it isn’t comparing two things using like or as. Instead, it is comparing two things directly.
Explanation:
hope this helped!
what is the philosophical issue presented in plato's euthyphro? discuss the argument from atheism that shafer-landau discusses and why he believes it's unsound. how is this argument related to plato's euthyphro? discuss all of the backstory and conversation between socrates and euthyphro leading up to the dilemma. discuss both versions of the dilemma, the implications of each side, and objections to divine command theory. next discuss the distinctions between universality, absolutism, and objectivity as well as shafer-landau's discussion of moral principles and moral facts, and how this speaks to his case for ethical objectivism.
The philoso-phical issue prese-nted in Plato's Euthyphro is - Plato's dia-log called Euthy-phro relates a discuss-ion that took place bet-ween Socrates and Euthyphro concern-ing the mean-ing of piety, or that virtue usu-ally regard-ed as a man-ner of living that ful-fills one's duty both to gods and to human-ity.
The quest-ion, "Do the gods love piety becau-se it is pious, or is it pious bec-ause the gods love it?" is one of the gre-at quest-ions posed in the history of philo-sophy. It sug-gests a distinction bet-ween an essen-tialist pers-pective and a convention-alist perspective.
The Euthyphro Prob-lem. an act is moral-ly per-missible if and only God does not for-bid it. The Euthyphro Quest-ion: “Is an action wrong beca-use God forbids it or does God for-bid it because it is wro-ng?”
To know more about Plato's Euthyphro click below:
brainly.com/question/17740077
#SPJ4
a report that follows the imrad structure (introduction, methods, results, and discussion) would most likely be written for which of the following courses?
A report that follows the IMRaD structure (introduction, methods, results, and discussion) would most likely be written for courses like social sciences, natural sciences, engineering, or computer sciences.
The term "IMRaD" designates a paper that is divided into the following four sections: introduction, methods, results, and discussion. Reports of any planned, systematic research in the social sciences, natural sciences, engineering, or computer sciences are frequently reported using this format, as are lab reports.
A scientific paper can be structured using the IMRaD format. It is frequently employed in the natural sciences and in healthcare. The IMRaD structure lacks a separate theory chapter, unlike theses in the social sciences. IMRaD-formatted theses are typically brief and to the point.
To learn more about sciences structures, tap here:
brainly.com/question/4558486
#SPJ4
What is the purpose of "enormous amounts of food" in the following sentence:
→ During the summer bears eat enormous amounts of food in preparation for their winter hibernation.
- It is an adverbial clause that explains how bears eat.
- It is a noun phrase that acts as the object of the verb eat.
- It is a prepositional phrase that provides more information about bears.
- It is an independent clause that provides more information about hibernation.
The purpose of "enormous amounts of food" in the following sentence:
→ During the summer bears eat enormous amounts of food in preparation for their winter hibernation" is that B. It is a noun phrase that acts as the object of the verb eat.
What is a Sentence?This refers to the use of words that are used to communicate between and among different people that makes complete sense and contains a subject and predicate.
Hence, it can be seen that based on the given sentence that talks about the huge amount of food eaten by bears, this is a noun phrase that acts as the object of the verb eat.
Read more about sentences here:
https://brainly.com/question/552895
#SPJ1
children of authoritarian parents tend to be ____ ,overly shy, and lack self- esteem
Answer:
Diffident
Explanation:
Diffident means modest or shy because of a lack of self-esteem. So I think that's the answer.
Answer:
smarter
Explanation:
It is best to use.
traveling from one place to another.
organization when a piece of writing gives directions för
OA. compare and contrast
OB. topical
O C. problem-solution
D. spatial
SUBMIT
It is best to use. traveling from one place to another compare and contrast organization when a piece of writing gives directions för Thus, option A is correct.
What is an organization?An organization is a gathering who cooperates, similar to a local affiliation, a cause, an association, or an enterprise. one can utilize the word organization to allude to gathering or business, or to the demonstration of shaping or laying out something.
Two topics are compared and contrasted in a comparison and contrast essay. According to how you structure of the text, someone can discuss one topic before moving on to another.
Therefore, option A is the correct option.
Learn more about organization , here:
https://brainly.com/question/4891892
#SPJ1
Explain how the author uses the other raft of refugees to impact the situation on Isabel's boat
in refugee chapter 44
Answer:
Instead of capturing her boat, the Coast Guard goes after a raft carrying other refugees, while Isabel and her companions paddle for shore as fast as they can.
Explanation:
I think
Answer: I love this book
Explanation:
write a narrative describing your strengths and weaknesses, and your plan for developing areas in which you are weak.
Below is the narrative writing of my strengths and weaknesses.
To begin with the my strengths and weakness, I realized not long ago. I had my own insecurities and strengths when it came to working with people .
I realized I had very good level of patience probably because I was the older in my home and could take my responsibilities without any issues. I loved to take care of my younger ones and it came natural to me. I knew this even when I was teaching kids and students, which needed a lot of patience.
When it comes to weaknesses I guess its the the way to do work, I thrive for perfection and this becomes an issue if I don't achieve the perfection overall in my work.
To know more about strengths and weaknesses visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24073107
#SPJ4
3. What details does Gary Paulsen use to describe
the appearance and expression of the wife of
the heart attack victim? Why might Paulsen
include these details? Cite evidence from the
text to support your answer. PLEASE HELLPP
Answer: The expressions of the wife and the victim was that the victim’s face was gray and that he was holding his left shoulder he also smiled sheepishly at Gary.
Explanation: I know this because the text states that,” His face was gray and he was holding his left shoulder with his right hand. He looked at me and smiled sheepishly, as if to apologize for the inconvenience, and started to say something but then stopped and looked again at the floor in what soldiers call the thousand-yard stare.”
In paragraph 12, what does the
description of the father's reaction
emphasize?
A. his frustration that his son is
upset again
B. his realization that it is a serious
situation
C. his anger that the deliveries will
be affected
D. his impatience at the irresponsibility
of the boys
Answer:
B. his realization that it is a serioussituation
PLEASE GIVE BRAINLIEST THANK YOU!!!
Which question would most likely be answered by reading the exposition of a
story?
Answer: B . What kind of story is this ?
Explanation:
which of the following statements is true about nonverbal communication?
a. Nonverbal communication has a minimal influence on the total emotional impact of a message.
b. Verbal communication and nonverbal communication comprise distinct spheres of interaction and rarely interconnect.
c. Most nonverbal messages convey information in lieu of verbal communication.
d. Being skilled at nonverbal communication is linked to popularity, attractiveness, and socioemotional well-being.
Because it facilitates or enhances verbal communication, nonverbal communication is crucial. When verbal and nonverbal cues are consistent, trust is increased.The answer is Verbal communication and nonverbal communication comprise distinct spheres of interaction and rarely interconnect.
Speaking loudly and clearly, as well as using nonverbal cues, are all essential components of effective communication.One way of transmitting information from one form or person to another is through communication.The act of communicating entails utilising words or signs that another person can understand. Both verbal and nonverbal means of communication, such as employing signs, may be used.People converse with one another and exchange information verbally or nonverbally to express their feelings, thoughts, expressions, likes, dislikes, opinions, and anything else.Verbal communication is the process by which people convey information by speaking it aloud.
To know more about Communication visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14279869
#SPJ4
What is the significance of the codeword “ad astra”? (Book is Chains from Laurie Halse Anderson)
In the book "Chains," the code word "ad astra" means "to the stars," and its significance lies in the fact that stars are regarded as providers of guidance.
What do the stars signify?In the book "Chains," the stars are symbol of guidance. As a matter of fact, stars are a representative of guidance since ancient times, as travelers and sailors would often find their way by looking at the stars.
The code word "ad astra" is given to Isabel in Chapter 16 of "Chains." The literal meaning of the Latin words is "to the stars." Again, the stars are used a symbol in the book, a sign of freedom, truth, guidance.
In the story, Isabel is a slave trying to obtain freedom for herself and her sister. The code word "ad astra" is given to her as a password she can use to enter the camp of the Patriots.
Learn more about "Chains" here:
https://brainly.com/question/21357522
#SPJ1
According to the article, writing a research paper helps students to become experts
on a topic.
Which sentence from the article BEST supports this idea?
A) A good expository research paper might dive into the history of the Electoral
College and explain why the Founders originally chose to create it.
B) In researching your topic, try to use sources that have been fact-checked or
peer-reviewed.
C) Group similar ideas together and identify larger themes that can act as mini-
arguments that support your thesis.
D) Once you've successfully written a draft, you should review and revise your
paper several more times.
PLEASE HELP I’LL GIVE U THE BRAINLIEST
Group similar ideas together and identify larger themes that can act as mini-arguments that support your thesis. Option C.
Concepts are explained throughout the essay. Thesis Statement: A statement describing the main argument or analysis of the main idea and the ideas supporting that argument or analysis. The paper should introduce the paper explaining how the author reveals the subject of the story.
Using information from reliable sources essays should provide definitions facts explanations and details about the topic. Essays may also include examples comparisons contrasts and cause and effect analysis. Many academic and work-related writing assignments are descriptive. A thesis statement is the basic point of view taken by the author the opinion they are expressing and the main points they wish to make about their topic.
Learn more about The article here:-https://brainly.com/question/25759088
#SPJ1
‼️‼️help immediately, i will mark best answer brainliest‼️‼️
4. Cite Evidence In lines 94-96, Madison says that "No man is allowed to be a judge
in his own cause, because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not
claim about the virtues of representative democracy? What claims in the second half
improbably, corrupt his integrity." How does this premise relate to Madison's main claim about the virtues of representative democracy? What claims in the second half of this publication are based on the premises in this paragraph?
Answer: This premise helps James Madison win the election against his enemies.
Explanation:
The text repeats the word deport and related words, such as deportation. How does this repetition serve the author’s purpose?.
The text re-peats the word deport and rel-ated words, such as deportation. This repetition ser-ves the author's pur-pose by - It empha-sizes the pote-ntial risks many immigrants face.
What is the purpose of deportation?Some of the most com-mon reasons for deportation are : An indi-vidual violates the terms of their immi-gration status (green card, non immi-grant visa, etc.) An indivi-dual was inadmissible at the ti-me where they enter-ed the country or adjust-ed their status.
What is the main purpose of immigration?Immigration is the pro-cess of mov-ing to a new cou-ntry or region with the inten-tion of stay-ing and living there.
To know more about deportation click below:
brainly.com/question/13543610
#SPJ4
How does Krulwich convey his purpose in the essay? Cite evidence from the text in
your response.
Krulwich convey his purpose through syntax, language, concepts etc.
What are the components by which purpose is conveyed ?The way a sentence is put together helps the author convey tone, intent, or effect. Details chosen include facts, conditions, traits, methods, etc. Any organizational tool is a form of rhetorical structure. Utilizing a timeline of events, plot, conflict, characterisation, setting, and other storytelling components‐
Language Manipulation: The author used diction and syntax with skill.Putting two concepts side by side is known as juxtaposing them (showing a before and after effect, for instance).Figures of Speech: Ingenious contrasts (similes, metaphors, personification, etc.)In mature writing, mature diction, diversified syntax, and good paragraph arrangement work together to convey a precise and insightful evaluation, analysis, impression, or declaration.Allusion: References to figures from literature, the arts, science, or history.To know more about Syntax click :
https://brainly.com/question/18362095
#SPJ1
I told him to chill, but he just couldn't stop whining.%0D%0A%0D%0AWhich revised sentence uses standard English?%0D%0A%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AI told him to relax, but he was all like whining.%0D%0AI told him to relax, but he was all like whining.%0D%0A%0D%0AI told him to relax, but he continued to complain.%0D%0AI told him to relax, but he continued to complain.%0D%0A%0D%0AI advised him to chill out, but he just couldn't stop whining.%0D%0AI advised him to chill out, but he just couldn't stop whining.%0D%0A%0D%0AI advised him to chill, but he continued to complain.
The revised sentence that uses standard English is this:
I told him to relax, but he continued to complain.What is standard English?Standard English is a way of writing the English language in a way that is devoid of informal diction. The words that are used in standard English can be comprehended by all who have learned the formal version of the English language.
Standard English is used in business settings and other official places and it is regarded as the right way to communicate. Informal English contains terms that can be only understood by a subset of individuals and is thus not right for standard use. So, the revised second option is right.
Learn more about standard English here:
https://brainly.com/question/8514043
#SPJ1
Read the excerpt from "What Does American Democracy Mean to Me?” by Mary McLeod Bethune.
We are rising out of the darkness of slavery into the light of freedom. Here my race has been afforded [the] opportunity to advance from a people 80 percent illiterate to a people 80 percent literate; . . . from total disfranchisement to participation in government; from the status of chattels to recognized contributors to the American culture.
Which statement best evaluates the effectiveness of the speaker’s argument?
It is effective because it mentions specific ways the lives of African Americans have improved.
It is not effective because it focuses on efforts to help African Americans learn to read.
It is not effective because it fails to highlight important achievements of African Americans.
It is effective because it explains how many African Americans are in government.
HELP HELP HELP PLEASE HELP
The statement that best evaluates the effectiveness of the speaker’s argument is this: It is effective because it mentions specific ways the lives of African Americans have improved.
Which statement explains the effectiveness of the speaker's words?The statement that explains the effectiveness of the speaker's words is the first statement that points out the fact that the speaker mentioned specific ways in which the lives of African Americans have improved. The speaker mentioned specific figures that highlighted the increase in the betterment of the intellect of African Americans.
He specifically mentioned that 80% of the people had now advanced from being illiterate to becoming literate. He also said that his people had advanced from being totally disenfranchised to becoming participants in government. So, the speaker's words were important because they mentioned specific ways in which people's lives have improved. This would make the readers grab the point and not miss out on it.
Learn more about American Democracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/1222510
#SPJ1
Read the excerpt from "Ain’t I a Woman?” by Sojourner Truth.
I could work as much and eat as much as a man—when I could get it—and bear the lash as well! And ain’t I a woman? I have borne thirteen children, and seen most all sold off to slavery, and when I cried out with my mother’s grief, none but Jesus heard me! And ain’t I a woman?
What evidence does the speaker use to support her claim in this excerpt?
her disagreements with men
her experiences from her life
her relationship with religion
her conversations with others
HELP HELPPPPP please
The evidence that the speaker uses to support her claim in this excerpt is this: her experiences from her life.
What evidence does the speaker use to support her claim?From the words in the text, we can see that the speaker used experiences from her life to support what she was saying. In this excerpt, we can see that Truth mentioned the fact that she had suffered a lot in life and had borne problems that many would have said were meant for women. She was trying to say that there was no significant reason why a woman should be denied the privileges that men enjoyed.
The personal experiences from her life that she used to back up her points were the fact that she had borne 13 children and that she had watched these children as they were sent into slavery. She had suffered all these things despite being a woman.
Learn more about Sojourner Truth here:
https://brainly.com/question/963143
#SPJ1
Why does Toby sit on Parker during a seizure?
Question 5 options:
Parker does not want Toby to bark or nip at his mother.
Parker can hug Toby during a seizure so he can calm down.
Toby wants to make sure Parker does not hurt himself.
The dog trainer told Mandy to have Toby sit on Parker.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
What were the legal steps to a person becoming a convict servant and serving out his or her sentence?
I rlly need help on this
In order to minimize shame, convicts who had been sold into indentured slavery and were succeeding in their new life were occasionally formally referred to as "servants." In the court records and archives of the government that convicted and transported these people, look for records of the trials and sentences.
Why did they stop sending convicts?The early United States of America was greatly influenced by these captives. However, the American colonies' unofficial status as a penal colony was swiftly ended by the American Revolutionary War. Following gaining independence, America stopped taking in convicts from the United Kingdom.
The health of prisoners was frequently excellent. They lived in houses that were either shared by a family with two or three rooms, or by inmates.
Thus, In order to minimize shame, convicts who had been sold into indentured.
For more information about stop sending convicts, click here
https://brainly.com/question/13461227
#SPJ1
Why have claudius and gertrude invited rosencrantz and guildenstern to elsinore?.
The main reason why Claudius and Gertrude invited Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to Elsinore is to help figure out what is bothering Hamlet as he has been acting very strangely indeed.
What is a Narration?This refers to the telling of a story that is used in order to show the series of actions that occurs so that a reader or audience would be able to understand the scenes and story.
Hence, it can be seen that based on the complete text about Hamlet, he has been acting crazy in court, and his friends Claudius and Gertrude are worried so they invite Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to Elsinore to help find out.
Read more about Hamlet here:
https://brainly.com/question/8182660
#SPJ1
Use context to determine the meaning of the word “provincial” as it is used in Shakespeare: The World as Stage. Write your definition of “provincial” here and tell how you found it.
The word “provincial” as it is used in Shakespeare: The World as Stage
Most provincial disapproving : no longer knowing or being concerned about people and activities in different locations : having slim or confined worries or pursuits.
An artist who has been criticized for being provincial His provincial mind-set was a source of inflammation for her.
Even though James had travelled all around the global, he nonetheless wore garb which turned into quite provincial and old.
2. because I grew up in an orphanage run by means of nuns,
i've a completely provincial outlook on life and tend to select the easy matters.
Learn more about provincial https://brainly.com/question/364780
#SPJ1