Answer:
The Middle East is a term used to describe the region that encompasses parts of Africa, Asia, and Europe. The region has a rich and complex history that dates back thousands of years. The Middle East is considered to be the birthplace of many of the world's major religions, including Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The history of the Middle East is marked by a series of conflicts and conquests, as well as periods of great cultural and scientific advancement.
One of the earliest civilizations in the Middle East was that of Sumer, which emerged in Mesopotamia (modern-day Iraq) around 4000 BC. The Sumerians developed a system of writing, created some of the first cities, and made significant advances in agriculture and architecture. They were eventually conquered by the Akkadians, who established the first empire in the region in the 24th century BC.
In the centuries that followed, the Middle East was dominated by a series of powerful empires, including the Babylonians, Assyrians, and Persians. The Babylonians were known for their contributions to mathematics and astronomy, while the Persians created one of the largest empires in history, which stretched from Greece to India.
The rise of Islam in the 7th century AD had a profound impact on the Middle East. Islam was founded by the prophet Muhammad, who preached a message of peace, unity, and social justice. The spread of Islam throughout the region led to the creation of a powerful Muslim empire, which dominated the Middle East for centuries. During this time, the Muslim world made significant advances in science, medicine, and the arts.
In the centuries that followed, the Middle East was shaped by a series of conquests and conflicts. The Crusades, a series of wars fought between Christian and Muslim forces in the 11th, 12th, and 13th centuries, had a significant impact on the region. The Ottomans, a Muslim empire that emerged in the 14th century, conquered much of the Middle East and ruled over the region for several centuries.
The 20th century was a period of significant change in the Middle East. Following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire after World War I, the region was carved up by European powers, with Britain and France taking control of much of the territory. The creation of Israel in 1948 led to a series of conflicts between Israel and its Arab neighbors, including the Arab-Israeli War of 1948 and the Six-Day War of 1967.
In the years that followed, the Middle East was shaped by a series of political and social movements, including Arab nationalism, Islamic fundamentalism, and the rise of oil-producing states in the Persian Gulf. The 21st century has been marked by ongoing conflicts in the region, including the Iraq War and the Syrian Civil War, as well as a growing threat from terrorist organizations such as ISIS.
In conclusion, the history of the Middle East is a complex and multifaceted one. It is a region that has been shaped by a series of powerful empires, religious movements, and conflicts. Despite the challenges it has faced, the Middle East has also been home to some of the world's most important cultural and scientific achievements. Today, the region remains a vital part of the world, with a rich and diverse cultural heritage that continues to inspire and influence people around the globe
Explanation:
What effect did world war ll have on culture in the United States
What was the American public's reaction to President Nixon’s decision to bomb Cambodia? Responses had no effect had no effect increased support increased support increased opposition increased opposition opened additional debate opened additional debate
Answer:
President Nixon's decision to bomb Cambodia in 1970 was met with a range of reactions from the American public. Initially, the decision was kept secret from the public, but when news of the bombing became public, it led to increased opposition to the Vietnam War.
Many Americans were shocked by the news and saw the bombing as an escalation of the war. The decision to bomb Cambodia without the approval of Congress also raised concerns about executive power and the role of the president in making decisions about military action.
The bombing led to protests and demonstrations across the country, with many Americans calling for an end to the war. Some students even went on strike, shutting down campuses across the country.
Overall, the bombing of Cambodia increased opposition to the war and opened up additional debates about the role of the US in Vietnam and the limits of presidential power.
Explanation:
List some words or phrases that come to mind when you think of each term:
Attic
Concentration camp
Holocaust
Freedom
Some words or phrases that come to mind with each term are:
Attic: storage, old things, memories, insulation, hiddenConcentration camp: oppression, prisoners, Holocaust, WWII, sufferingHolocaust: genocide, WWII, death camps, atrocities, anti-SemitismFreedom: liberty, independence, democracy, human rights, liberationWhy these words ?For "Attic," the words I listed relate to the physical characteristics of attics, such as storage, insulation, and being a place to keep old things or memories. Additionally, attics are often hidden or out of the way, so the word "hidden" also comes to mind.
For "Concentration Camp," the words I listed relate to the negative aspects of concentration camps, such as oppression, imprisonment, and suffering. Concentration camps are often associated with the Holocaust and WWII, so these terms also come to mind.
For "Holocaust," the words I listed relate to the atrocities that occurred during this event, such as genocide, death camps, and anti-Semitism. These terms reflect the gravity and horror of the Holocaust.
For "Freedom," the words I listed relate to the positive aspects of freedom, such as liberty, independence, and human rights.
Find out more on the Holocaust at https://brainly.com/question/20620881
#SPJ1
during the second phase of the french and indian war, the british forced colonists to join the military, a practice known as
Answer:
During the second phase of the French and Indian War, the British government did not force colonists to join the military. However, they did encourage colonists to participate in the war effort by enlisting in the military voluntarily or by providing financial or material support.
It is possible that the statement is referring to a later period in history, such as the American Revolution, during which the British did force colonists to join the military through conscription or impressment.
Which best describes how Southern slaveholders reacted to the Emancipation Proclamation?
They were furious.
They staged work slowdowns.
They joined the Union army.
They freed their enslaved people.
please answer asap 50 points pls hurry its for a test brainly if right
Which of the following was NOT one of the things done to the Armenian people?
Their churches were vandalized
Groups were taken into the desert and shot
Their property was taken away and sold to the highest bidder
O Their children were taken and put into "reeducation schools"
O They were sent to labor camps
They were forcefully relocated
Armenian women were raped
During the Progressive Era, nongovernmental organizations such as the NAACP and the ADL worked to gain rights and end discrimination for minority groups. Explain how you think these groups worked to correct injustices in American life.
Can someone please help me
They fought for civil rights through legal action, lobbying, and public education campaigns to raise awareness and challenge discriminatory laws and practices. They also organized peaceful protests to push for reforms that ensured equal treatment under the law.
During the Progressive Era, nongovernmental organizations such as the NAACP and the ADL worked tirelessly to correct injustices in American life by advocating for legislative and policy changes that would advance civil rights and end discrimination against minority groups.
These organizations used various strategies such as legal action, lobbying, public education campaigns, and peaceful protests to achieve their goals.
They worked to raise public awareness about the injustices faced by minority groups, challenged discriminatory laws and practices in courts, and pushed for reforms that would ensure equal treatment under the law.
Their efforts played a crucial role in advancing civil rights for African Americans, Jews, and other marginalized groups, and helped pave the way for the more inclusive and diverse society we have today.
Learn more about Progressive Era here:
https://brainly.com/question/29547701
#SPJ1
They fought for civil rights through legal action, lobbying, and public education campaigns to raise awareness and challenge discriminatory laws and practices. They also organized peaceful protests to push for reforms that ensured equal treatment under the law.
During the Progressive Era, nongovernmental organizations such as the NAACP and the ADL worked tirelessly to correct injustices in American life by advocating for legislative and policy changes that would advance civil rights and end discrimination against minority groups.
These organizations used various strategies such as legal action, lobbying, public education campaigns, and peaceful protests to achieve their goals.
They worked to raise public awareness about the injustices faced by minority groups, challenged discriminatory laws and practices in courts, and pushed for reforms that would ensure equal treatment under the law.
Their efforts played a crucial role in advancing civil rights for African Americans, Jews, and other marginalized groups, and helped pave the way for the more inclusive and diverse society we have today.
Learn more about Progressive Era here:
https://brainly.com/question/29547701
#SPJ1
Which company has played the biggest role in the rise of Washington's space economy?
Question 1 options:
Wave Motion Launch Corp.
LeoStella
Blue Origin
Starlink
What impact did organization like National Organization for Women or American Indian Movement have during the Civil Rights Movement?
The National Organization for Women (NOW) and the American Indian Movement (AIM) were two influential organizations that had a significant impact on the Civil Rights Movement.
What is NOW?
NOW was founded in 1966, and it advocated for gender equality and women's rights. The organization worked to end discrimination against women in the workplace, schools, and politics. NOW played a crucial role in advocating for the Equal Rights Amendment, which sought to add a constitutional amendment to guarantee equal rights regardless of sex. NOW's efforts resulted in many legislative and policy changes that improved the status of women in the United States.
Overall, both NOW and AIM contributed to the Civil Rights Movement by bringing attention to issues of discrimination and inequality faced by women and Native Americans. Through their activism, they were able to bring about important changes in policies and attitudes towards these groups.
Learn more about NOW from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/26691949
#SPJ1
Write a brief summary of what you might have done differently if you were the president of the United States during this time. Use text evidence to support your answer. If you would have done the same thing, justify your reasoning.
Abraham Lincoln was as quickly as the sixteenth president of the United States of America, who successfully prosecuted the Civil War to maintain the nation. He carried out in key function in passage of the Thirteenth Amendment, which formally ended slavery in America.
What are 3 quintessential things about Abraham Lincoln?➢ At 6 foot, 4 inches, Abraham Lincoln was as quickly as the tallest president. ➢ Lincoln was once as soon as the first president to be born outdoor of the real thirteen colonies. ➢ Lincoln used to be the first president to be photographed at his inauguration. John Wilkes Booth (his assassin) can be seen standing shut to Lincoln in the picture.
Still, the most lasting accomplishments attributed to Lincoln are the renovation of the Union, the vindication of democracy, and the loss of life of slavery, all accomplished by using capability of skill of the methods in which he dealt with the disaster that most sincerely would have ended in any other case with a lesser man in office.
Learn more about president of the United States here:
https://brainly.com/question/984516#SPJ11. The invasion of Iraq was very controversial. Many editors and columnists voiced strong opinions on the Iraq War. Use your knowledge of current events and the information in your textbook to write two short editorials. One should state why the United States should have invaded Iraq; the other editorial should state why the United States should not have invaded Iraq.
Some points you may wish to consider:
• What was the stated purpose of the invasion?
• Why did the United States initiate a preemptive war?
• Has the United States engaged in preemptive wars in the past?
• Were there alternatives to invasion?
• Was it reasonable to assume that the U.S. military could defeat the Iraqi military?
• What strategy did the United States have for rebuilding the Iraqi government and economy after the fall of Saddam Hussein?
• What was the American public asked to do to support the war effort?
• What was the human cost of the war on Iraq and on the United States?
• What was the economic impact of the war on Iraq and on the United States?
• How did the invasion affect relations between the United States and its traditional allies?
• How did the invasion affect relations between the United States and other nations of the Middle East?
Answer: Full version Editorial 1: Why the United States Should Have Invaded Iraq
The United States made the right decision to invade Iraq. Saddam Hussein had a history of aggression towards neighboring countries and had shown a willingness to use chemical weapons against his own people. The United States had reason to believe that he was developing weapons of mass destruction, which posed a threat not only to the Middle East but to the entire world. The preemptive strike was necessary to prevent a potential attack on the United States or its allies.
In addition, the United States had exhausted all other options, including diplomatic efforts and economic sanctions. The invasion was a last resort to protect American interests and ensure global security. The U.S. military was well-equipped to defeat the Iraqi military, and the strategy for rebuilding the Iraqi government and economy was well thought out.
The American public was asked to support the war effort by making sacrifices, including paying higher taxes and accepting increased security measures. The human and economic costs of the war were significant, but they were necessary to ensure global security and prevent the development and use of weapons of mass destruction.
Editorial 2: Why the United States Should Not Have Invaded Iraq
The United States should not have invaded Iraq. The stated purpose of the invasion, to find and destroy weapons of mass destruction, was not supported by the available evidence. The United States initiated a preemptive war without clear evidence of an imminent threat, which violated international law and damaged the reputation of the United States.
The United States had engaged in preemptive wars in the past, but those were different circumstances. In the case of Iraq, there were viable alternatives to invasion, including continued diplomatic efforts and economic sanctions.
The assumption that the U.S. military could easily defeat the Iraqi military was misguided. The strategy for rebuilding the Iraqi government and economy was poorly planned, and the United States struggled to stabilize the country after the fall of Saddam Hussein.
The human cost of the war was significant, with many Iraqi civilians and American soldiers losing their lives or being injured. The economic impact of the war was also substantial, with billions of dollars spent on the war effort. The invasion damaged relations between the United States and its traditional allies and strained relations with other nations in the Middle East.
In conclusion, the United States should not have invaded Iraq. The stated purpose of the invasion was not supported by the evidence, and there were viable alternatives to invasion. The human and economic costs of the war were significant, and the invasion damaged global security and relations between nations.
Explanation:
Shorter version of Editorial 1: Why the United States Should Have Invaded Iraq
The United States had good reasons to invade Iraq. Saddam Hussein had a history of aggression and was believed to be developing weapons of mass destruction. The U.S. had tried other options and believed the preemptive strike was necessary for global security. The American public was asked to support the war effort, and the human and economic costs were necessary to prevent potential threats.
Shorter version of Editorial 2: Why the United States Should Not Have Invaded Iraq
The United States should not have invaded Iraq because the stated purpose of finding weapons of mass destruction was not supported by evidence, and there were viable alternatives to invasion. The assumption that the U.S. military could easily defeat the Iraqi military was misguided, and the strategy for rebuilding Iraq was poorly planned. The human and economic costs of the war were significant, and it damaged global security and relations between nations.
GIVING BRAINLIEST!!!
What was Arkansas required to do to become a part of the union again?
To become a part of the union again, Arkansas added its male population to vote and join towards President Lincoln's Ten-Percent Plan for reconstruction of the union of America.
On 1861, as President Lincoln announced for the requirement of about 75,000 troops to bombard Fort Sumter, the state of Arkansas that slipped away from the union before, admitted all of its 79 delegates to vote for the addressal of President Lincoln. On that note, even around 52,000 residents vouched to join the addressal and the union.
Hence, as per the aforesaid statements, all that Arkansas required to join the union was to mitigate differences, and vouch its residents and troops in favor of President Lincoln's addressal.
To know more about Arkansas's inclusion into the union:
brainly.com/question/2234154
Based on the information in this lesson, make three predictions about what you think will happen over the course of the Cold War. Be sure to explain why you think your predictions will come true, and support your answer with appropriate facts and details.
During the Cold War, no direct fighting took place between American and Soviet soldiers. Nonetheless, over the course of the Cold War, the two superpowers continued to irritate one another by political bluffing and military alliances.
Why is creating the future the greatest approach to foresee the future?The saying "The greatest way to forecast your future is to make it" has been attributed to Abraham Lincoln and countless others. Honest Abe originally said it, and it is still true now, when the world is far less predictable than it once was.
In a sentence, what does prediction mean?The outcome of the upcoming election is already being predicted by journalists. It was expected that the store would fail, but it has done extremely well. The statistics and data are utilised to forecast future economic developments.
To know more about Cold War visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/26831734
#SPJ1
How did the Chinese government respond to the British opium trade?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Chinese government recognized that opium was becoming a serious social problem and, in the year 1800, it banned both the production and the importation of opium. In 1813, it went a step further by outlawing the smoking of opium and imposing a punishment of beating offenders 100 times.
although it was a nationwide phenomenon, 1950s suburbanization gathered its greatest momentum in the west. group of answer choices true false
who was proslavery theologian and preacher who appointed university of missouri president in 1850s, then fired once university founder james s. rollins got back control.
The proslavery theologian and preacher who appointed the University of Missouri president in the 1850s, and was then fired once university founder James S. Rollins regained control, was Robert S. Thomas.
In Columbia, Missouri, the institution of Missouri is a public land-grant research institution. It is the largest institution in Missouri and the flagship of the four-campus institution of Missouri System. MU was the first public institution west of the Mississippi River, established in 1839. Southern pro-slavery thinkers said that slavery thwarted any such attempt at equality by raising all free people to the level of "citizen" and thereby excluding the landless poor (the "mudsill") from the political process.
To read more about University of Missouri click here
https://brainly.com/question/30399161
#SPJ11
31
how Hannah Wynne and Jordan Romero became successful when they were very
In "Meet Hannah Wynne: Teen Storyteller" and "Reaching for the Top," the authors tell
show if adults helped them to become successful? Use details from both articles to
young. What is different about how adults are mentioned in the articles?
In articles, meet Hannah Wynne the Teen Storyteller and reaching for the Top, Jordan Romero became successful at young age, but did in different ways with different level of adult support.
What are articles?History articles are written works that explore and analyze past events, people, and cultures. They provide readers with a better understanding of the past and how it has shaped the present. History articles can cover a wide range of topics, from political events and military conflicts to social and cultural movements. They may also examine the lives of individuals who have had a significant impact on history, such as great leaders or influential artists. Typically, history articles are written by historians or researchers who have a deep knowledge and understanding of the subject matter. They often rely on primary and secondary sources to provide accurate and insightful information. History articles can be found in a variety of formats, including academic journals, magazines, newspapers, and online publications.
To learn more about articles, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13147313
#SPJ1
what was not a part of the motown's policy with recorded sound?
Answer:
A spontaneous session environment is the answer.
following the death of Genghis khan, what did the Mongols do to help manage their large empire
Answer:
His sons, daughters, and grandsons took over him
Explanation:
His empire was way o big to be controlled by one person, so they had his sons, daughters, and grandsons the hight to rule.
Why does Jack think that dressing the way that they were dressed would help them when dealing with Jack?
Jack believes that dressing the way they were dressed would give them an advantage when dealing with him.
He believes that it will make them appear more professional and that they will be taken more seriously. By dressing in a way that is appropriate for the situation, it can help to create an atmosphere of respect and trust. This can be especially helpful when trying to negotiate a business deal or when trying to influence someone in power.
It can also make it easier to break the ice and open the lines of communication. By dressing the part, Jack believes that the people he is dealing with will be more likely to listen to his ideas and respects his authority.
To know more about business deal, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29509863
#SPJ4
1815 Napoleon's Surrender, Landmark in Europe is called?
Napoleon's surrender in 1815 is often referred to as the Battle of Waterloo. The battle took place on June 18, 1815, in Waterloo, Belgium, and marked the final defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte.
The battle was fought between Napoleon's army and a coalition of British, Dutch, and German forces commanded by the Duke of Wellington. After a day-long battle, the coalition forces emerged victorious, and Napoleon was subsequently exiled to the island of Saint Helena in the South Atlantic, where he lived out the remainder of his life. The Battle of Waterloo is considered a landmark event in European history, as it marked the end of the Napoleonic Wars and the beginning of a period of relative peace and stability in Europe
Learn more about defeat here:
https://brainly.com/question/12666400
#SPJ11
How most of the Southerners reacted to the election of Lincoln in 1860
This book was written by a Northern woman who wanted to put a face to
slavery. The story was about a family who had been separated and sold to
different plantation owners.
Answer:
The book you are referring to is likely "Uncle Tom's Cabin" by Harriet Beecher Stowe. It was written by a Northern woman and published in 1852. The novel portrays the harsh realities of slavery in the United States and tells the story of a family that is separated and sold to different plantation owners, aiming to raise awareness about the inhumanity of slavery and advocate for its abolition.
Explanation:
Answer:
The book you are referring to is likely "Uncle Tom's Cabin" by Harriet Beecher Stowe. It was written by a Northern woman and published in 1852. The novel portrays the harsh realities of slavery in the United States and tells the story of a family that is separated and sold to different plantation owners, aiming to raise awareness about the inhumanity of slavery and advocate for its abolition.
Explanation:
Answer:
The book you are describing is likely "Uncle Tom's Cabin" by Harriet Beecher Stowe. It was published in 1852 and is considered one of the most influential novels in American history.
The story follows the lives of several slaves and their families, including Uncle Tom, who is sold to several different owners after his original owner dies. The novel is known for its vivid depiction of the horrors of slavery and its impact on families and communities. It is credited with helping to galvanize support for the abolitionist movement in the United States.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The book you are describing is likely "Uncle Tom's Cabin" by Harriet Beecher Stowe. It was published in 1852 and is considered one of the most influential novels in American history.
The story follows the lives of several slaves and their families, including Uncle Tom, who is sold to several different owners after his original owner dies. The novel is known for its vivid depiction of the horrors of slavery and its impact on families and communities. It is credited with helping to galvanize support for the abolitionist movement in the United States.
Hope this helps!
Identify whether each factor affecting American society is mainly geographic, social, or economic in nature.
Pls help.
The factors are accurately matched below:
The FactorsImmigration induces diversity, essentially social in character as individuals from various social identities and cultural backgrounds interact and integrate.
Religious-based moral-guideline systems also factor into society with views and practices originating from an array of religious groups which impact people's individual and collective conduct through mainly social means.
People’s capability to own their personal properties derives from the economic structure of legal and monetary frameworks entitling them to obtain, utilize, and dispose of it summarizing that this is primarily an economic characteristic.
Lastly, there exists a spatial instance - a vast frontier covering geography- spanning American landscape that lends itself naturally to exploration and colonisation accounting for its historical run towards greater western enterprise; a truly geographic feature.
Read more about geography here:
https://brainly.com/question/12790602
#SPJ1
which of the following is a result of the french and indian war?
England became the leading colonial power in the world, French forts were captured along the Great Lakes and the Treaty of Paris was signed to officially end the war are the results of the French and Indian war.
The British and French empires fought for control of North America in the French and Indian War which was a significant conflict. It lasted for four years, from 1754 to 1763 and was fought mainly in the North American colonies but also involved European powers in Europe, Asia, and Africa.
The Treaty of Paris which confirmed British control over the newly conquered territories and signaled the beginning of the end for French colonial power in North America, brought an end to the war in 1763. The British victory in the conflict elevated them to the position of worlds most powerful colonial nation greatly enhancing their territorial holdings and securing their authority in the area.
The question is incomplete, complete question will be "Which of the following is a result of the French and Indian War? (Select all that apply):
England became the leading colonial power in the world.
French forts were captured along the Great Lakes.
The French became the leading colonial power in the world.
The Treaty of Paris was signed to officially end the war.
The British forests along the Great Lakes were captured which ended the war."
Learn more about colonial power at:
brainly.com/question/14465232
#SPJ1
History. What was Samuel Bamford's advice to the demonstrators assembled at Barrowfields for parliamentary reform should peace officers come to arrest any person?
Group of answer choices
The demonstrators were to resist without resorting to violence.
The demonstrators were to disperse immediately.
The demonstrators were to take up arms against the police.
The demonstrators were not to resist.
The demonstrators were to seek safety in the nearby church.
Samuel Bamford advised the demonstrators assembled at Barrowfields for parliamentary reform that, should peace officers come to arrest any person, they were to resist without resorting to violence.
Bamford was a prominent figure in the 19th century Chartist movement, which advocated for universal suffrage and other democratic reforms. At the Barrowfields demonstration in 1819, which was part of a larger movement for parliamentary reform, Bamford advised the protesters to resist arrest without resorting to violence. This was in line with the Chartist movement's commitment to nonviolence as a means of achieving political change. Bamford's advice reflects the tension between the desire for reform and the fear of repression by the government and its agents. By encouraging resistance, but emphasizing nonviolence, Bamford sought to balance the need for action with the need for caution and restraint. The advice to resist without resorting to violence was a common strategy employed by many social and political movements throughout history. This approach recognizes the legitimacy of peaceful protest and civil disobedience, while also acknowledging the potential dangers of direct confrontation with authorities. By resisting arrest without violence, protesters can draw attention to their cause and challenge the authority of those seeking to repress them, without escalating the conflict into a more violent and potentially destructive confrontation. Bamford's advice to the Barrowfields demonstrators reflects a larger tradition of nonviolent resistance, which has played an important role in many struggles for social and political change.
Know more about demonstrators assembled at Barrowfields here:
https://brainly.com/question/873638
#SPJ11
The government of Nazi Germany used terror to control the population.
Which details would provide helpful factual support to this statement? Select all that apply.
the name of the head of the Gestapo
the types of uniforms worn by the Gestapo
the tactics used by the secret police
the reasons why certain citizens were targeted
the number of people imprisoned or executed as political prisoners
The last three options are to fully correct the secret police tactics, the reasons why certain citizens were targeted, and the number of people imprisoned or executed as political prisoners.
How was Nazi Germany's government?Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party governed Nazi Germany as a totalitarian dictatorship under the Führerprinzip. Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany in January 1933, followed by the suspension of basic rights with the Reichstag Fire Decree and the Enabling Act, which gave Hitler's regime the power to pass and enforce laws without the involvement of the Reichstag or the German president, and ended with Germany's surrender in World War II on May 8, 1945.
To know about Germany visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1061130
#SPJ1
Which statement below best describes Cincinnatus and Julius Caesar?
Responses
Both men put the welfare of the Roman Republic above their own personal success and both obeyed the Senate in time of crisis.
Both men put the welfare of the Roman Republic above their own personal success and both obeyed the Senate in time of crisis.
Cincinnatus accepted the role of dictator in a crisis and then gave up his power; Caesar used a crisis to gain power and then made himself dictator for life.
Cincinnatus accepted the role of dictator in a crisis and then gave up his power; Caesar used a crisis to gain power and then made himself dictator for life.
Cincinnatus used his reputation as a general to gain political power; Caesar used his oratorical skills to convince the Senate to make needed reforms.
Cincinnatus used his reputation as a general to gain political power; Caesar used his oratorical skills to convince the Senate to make needed reforms.
Neither man wanted to take on the role of dictator because they valued the role of the citizens in a true republic.
Neither man wanted to take on the role of dictator because they valued the role of the citizens in a true republic.
Both men put the welfare of the Roman Republic above their own personal success and both obeyed the Senate in time of crisis best describes Cincinnatus and Julius Caesar.
Julius Caesar and Cincinnatus both played significant roles in Roman history. Roman statesman and military commander Cincinnatus held the position of dictator twice. In each instance he assumed the role of dictator in response to a crisis but immediately abdicated it once the situation was under control.
Roman general and statesman Julius Caesar was instrumental in transforming the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire. Caesar is renowned for using a crisis to seize control and then installing himself as dictator for life which ultimately resulted in his murder by rival politicians.
Both men were well known for their political and military leadership, but they had very different styles of power and leadership.
Learn more about Roman Republic at:
brainly.com/question/28177874
#SPJ1
Both men put the welfare of the Roman Republic above their own personal success and both obeyed the Senate in time of crisis best describes Cincinnatus and Julius Caesar.
Julius Caesar and Cincinnatus both played significant roles in Roman history. Roman statesman and military commander Cincinnatus held the position of dictator twice. In each instance he assumed the role of dictator in response to a crisis but immediately abdicated it once the situation was under control.
Roman general and statesman Julius Caesar was instrumental in transforming the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire. Caesar is renowned for using a crisis to seize control and then installing himself as dictator for life which ultimately resulted in his murder by rival politicians.
Both men were well known for their political and military leadership, but they had very different styles of power and leadership.
Learn more about Roman Republic at:
brainly.com/question/28177874
#SPJ1
In 1795, which group was created as an
executive body for France made up of
five men?
A. The Directory
B. Legislative Assembly
C. Jacobins
Answer:
A. The Directory
Explanation:
The Directory (also called Directorate, French: le Directoire) was the governing five-member committee in the French First Republic from 2 November 1795 until 10 November 1799, when it was overthrown by Napoleon Bonaparte in the Coup of 18 Brumaire and replaced by the Consulate.
19.
20. A major point of opposition to the league of nations was the concern that the organization would drag the united states into other europeans wars in 3-4 sentences, explain why you disagree or agree with that point.
Opposition to the League of Nations due to the concern that it would drag the United States into other European wars was not unfounded.
The United States had previously been pulled into World War I despite efforts to remain neutral, and the fear of being dragged into future conflicts was a legitimate concern.
However, it is also worth considering the potential benefits of the League in promoting international cooperation and preventing future wars.
Ultimately, the decision not to join the League weakened its ability to achieve these goals, but the concerns about being drawn into wars were not unfounded.
Learn more about World war I here:
brainly.com/question/27326515
#SPJ1