WILL NAME BRAINLIST PLEASE
Use the table to write a linear function that relates y to x . PLEASE NO HACKERS
y=

Answer:

a. Given a number of tablespoons, find the number of cups:

1. Since he needs 2 cups, he can use 2×16=32 tablespoons.

2.Since he needs 1/2 cup, he can use 1/2×16=8 tablespoons.

He needs 1 1/4 cups. 1 cup is 16 tablespoons. 1/4 cup is 1/4×16=4 tablespoons. So altogether he needs 16+4=20 tablespoons.Given a number of cups, find the number of tablespoons:

I already found that 20 tablespoons is 1 1/4 cups. So for 28 tablespoons I need an additional 8 tablespoons, or an additional 1/2 cup. 1 1/4+1/2=1 3/4, so 28 tablespoons gets him 1 3/4 cups. (Alternatively, we might say that 1 tablespoon is 1/16 cups. 1/16×28=28/16, which we can rewrite as 1 12/16 or 1 3/4.)

I notice that to convert from tablespoons to cups, I always divide by 16. 6÷16=6/16, which we can write as 1 3/8. (Alternatively, 1 tablespoon is 1/16 cups. 1/16×6=6/16, which we can rewrite as 1 3/8.)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

basically, with each value of x, you replace it by x on the equation

Step-by-step explanation:

y=1/3(12)

y=4

--------

y=1/3(3)

y=1

--------

y=1/3(18)

y=6

-------

hope this helped!

Answer:

158.4 i think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

f = 9c 5 + 288/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4a + 13b

Step-by-step explanation:

-2a + 5b + 6a + 8b

combine like terms:

4a + 13b

Answer:

4a+13b

Step-by-step explanation:

-2a+6a+5b+8b. group like terms

4a+13b

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  2

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope formula is useful for this.

  m = (y2 -y1)/(x2 -x1)

  m = (-2 -(-6))/(3 -1) = 4/2 = 2

The slope of the line is 2.

Answer: 4/5 = .8

cos adj/hyp of r is .8

HOWEVER...

I’m assuming it’s talking about angle R...

Answer:

The correct options are a and c.

Step-by-step explanation:

Confidence interval:

A confidence interval is given by the sample proportion plus/minus the margin of error. This means that the confidence interval is symmetric, that is, the difference between the upper bound and the sample proportion has to be the same as the difference between the sample proportion and the lower bound.

Sample proportion is 0.55

So options for the confidence interval are:

Lower bound - upper bound

0.54 - 0.56

0.53 - 0.57(which means that option b is wrong)

0.52 - 0.58(which means that option c is right)

...

0.5 - 0.6(which means that option a is right).

The correct options are a and c.

The confidence interval is the range of value between which the true population proportion would lie given a certain margin of error. Hence the correct options are A and C

Hence, the upper and lower boundary would the same error value above and below the mean proportion.

Evaluating the options given :

Error below = 0.50 - 0.55 = -0.05

Error above = 0.60 - 0.55 = 0.05

Error below = 0.53 - 0.55 = -0.02

Error above = 0.59 - 0.55 = 0.04

Error below = 0.52 - 0.55 = -0.03

Error above = 0.58 - 0.55 = 0.03

Error below = 0.60 - 0.55 = 0.05

Error above = 0.70 - 0.55 = 0.15

Error below = 0.45 - 0.55 = -0.10

Error above = 0.60 - 0.55 = 0.05

Therefore, the only options with equal margin of error, above and below the mean are options A and C.

Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/15111061

Answer:

220

Step-by-step explanation:

Divisor • Quotient + Remainder = Dividend

The divisor is 8, the quotient is 27, the remainder is 4.

27 • 8 = 216; 216+ 4= 220 (Don’t forget that multiplication is commutative, so 8 & 27 can swap places!) 220 is the number that when divided by 8 gives 27 remainder 4.

In simpler way

Dividend = divisor × quotient + remainder.

Divisor = 8, quotient = 27, remainder = 4.

Dividend = (8×27)+4,

= 216+ 4

= 220

The number is 220.

For proof

Answer:

The​ P-value method and the classical method are not equivalent to the confidence interval method in that they may yield different results ( A )

Step-by-step explanation:

The False statement about using the confidence interval method when testing a claim about  μ when  σ is​ unknown is ; The​ P-value method and the classical method are not equivalent to the confidence interval method in that they may yield different results

This is because sometimes the values gotten from the p-value and confidence interval differs and this occurs mostly when the sample size is very small.

Answer:

m<RTS=63

m<PTQ=27

Step-by-step explanation:

8x-17=5x+13

x=10

5(10)+13=63

8(10)-17=63

<RTQ=<UTQ

90-63=27

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{x}{42}=tan 30=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3} }\\x=\frac{42}{\sqrt{3} } \times \frac{\sqrt{3}}{\sqrt{3}} =14\sqrt{3} \\\frac{42}{y} =\cos ~30=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \\y=\frac{84}{\sqrt{3}} \times \frac{\sqrt{3}}{\sqrt{3}} =\frac{84 \sqrt{3}}{3} =28 {\sqrt{3}}[/tex]

Answer:

Table A

[tex]y = 1.5x + 4 \\ table \: A \: satisfies \: the \: equation[/tex]

Answer:

Domain:  

(

5

,

∞

)

,

{

x

|

x

>

5

}

Range:  

(

−

∞

,

∞

)

,

{

y

|

y

∈

R

}

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer is negative 22

Step-by-step explanation:

-2 x 11 = -22

Answer:

200G

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Hamburgers + Cheeseburgers= 390

Hamburgers= x

Cheeseburgers= 2x

2x+x= 390

3x=390

x=130

Hamburgers sold= 130

Answer:

You only want a 10% discount...

500 - 450 = 50  

50/500 = 1/10 = .1 = 10%

Answer:

10%

Step-by-step explanation:

450 of 500 is 90%

so you would ask for a 10% discount.

Answer:

The answer is C: 355.2 mL.

Step-by-step explanation:

12*29.6=355.2. I hope this helps! Have a great rest of your day!

Answer:

The distance to horizon is 25.64 miles for the parasail.

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance to horizon for a given height is given as

[tex]d=\sqrt{2hR}[/tex]

Here

So the distance becomes

[tex]d=\sqrt{2hR}\\d=\sqrt{2\times 0.083\times 3959}\\d=\sqrt{657.194}\\d=25.6357 \text{ miles}\\d=25.64\text{ miles}[/tex]

So the distance to horizon is 25.64 miles for the parasail.

Answer: B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: I think it is T,F,T,T hope this helped

plz make brainly

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

31.6°

Step-by-step explanation:

The triangle given us a right angled Triangle

We solve the above question using the trigonometric function of Tangent

The formula is given as:

tan θ = opp/adj

θ = m∠G = ?

Opposite = EF is 28.2

Adjacent = GF is 45.8

tan θ = 28.2/45.8

θ = arc tan (28.2/45.8)

θ = 31.621459805°

Approximately

m∠G = 31.6°

Answer:

1. 12.9

2. 14

Step-by-step explanation:

11, 18, 7, 14, 5, 16, 14. 18

Added Together it is 103.

Divided by 8, it is around 12.9

5, 7, 11, 14, 14, 16, 18, 18

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given data:

Mean is the average:

Put the data in the ascending order, the median is the average of the two middle numbers when number of data is even:

Answer:

212

Step-by-step explanation:

hope you will understand

Answer:

[tex]y=-\frac{1}{2} x-3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there!

Slope intercept form: [tex]y=mx+b[/tex] where m is the slope of the line and b is the y-intercept (the value of y when the line crosses the y-axis)

1) Determine the slope

The slope of a line is the same as its [tex]\frac{rise}{run}[/tex], or in other words, the number of units the line moves upwards over the number of units the line moves to the right.

In the graph, we can see that for every 2 units it moves right, it moves down 1 units. Therefore, our slope is [tex]-\frac{1}{2}[/tex]. This is negative since it is traveling downwards.

Plug [tex]-\frac{1}{2}[/tex] into [tex]y=mx+b[/tex] as m:

[tex]y=-\frac{1}{2} x+b[/tex]

2) Determine the y-intercept

In the graph, we can see that the line crosses the y-axis when y is equal to -3. Plug -3 into [tex]y=-\frac{1}{2} x+b[/tex] as b:

[tex]y=-\frac{1}{2} x-3[/tex]

I hope this helps!

Answer:

432

Step-by-step explanation:

V=length×width×height

= 8×6=48

=48×9=432

Answer:

[tex]432{mm}^{3} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]9mm \times 6mm \times 8mm = 432 {mm}^{3} [/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:600

Answer: b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

How many nickels make a 2 dollars?

40 nickels

50 per penny roll or 40 nickels to complete a $2 roll, the denominations can become less self-explanatory the higher the face value and physical thickness of a coin