Many international organizations criminalize a cultural ritual (female genital cutting) practiced in many African countries. However, we must not criticize any cultural ritual; we must see it in its own context. What kind of perspective is this?
Answer:
The perspective of cultural relativism
Explanation:
Cultural Relativism is the sociological and anthropological perspective that establishes that cultures are different, that no culture is inherently superior to others, and that each culture should be understood according to its own terms and context, instead of being judged under the lenses of a different culture.
For this reason, the ritual of female genital mutilation would not be judged in ethical terms by a person viewing it from the perspective of cultural relativism, because this person would think of the ritual as something to be understood within its particular context, and as equally valid as many other rituals that can be seen in other cultures.
And exchange for cheap land settlers in Texas were required to do what by the Mexican government
Answer:
Mexican government allowed speculators, called empresarios, to acquire large tracts of land if they promised to bring in settlers to populate the region and make it profitable. Texas became a breeding ground for distrust and differences between the US and Mexico. In an attempt to enforce control, the Mexican government tried to force the end of slavery in the region, impose taxes, and end immigration from the United States.
Explanation:
Answer:
Stephen Austin's contract to bring settlers to Texas, June 4, 1825 (Gilder Lehrman Collection) In order to settle Texas in the 1820s, the Mexican government allowed speculators, called empresarios, to acquire large tracts of land if they promised to bring in settlers to populate the region and make it profitable.
Explanation:
What is a responsibility of the U.S senate in foreign policy and why?
A. Nominating Ambassadors
B. Introducing Tax Bills
C. Negotiating Treaties
D. Ratifying Treaties
(Will give brainliest)
Answer:d
Explanation:because that’s what they do
How many times do I need to repeat myself and NO LINKS
Which of the following is often considered the most fundamental question about environmental ethics?
Group of answer choices
What are the most moral food choices?
Do we have a moral obligation to grow our population?
How should non-human animals be treated by science?
What is the moral value of clean water?
What moral obligations do we have about the environment?
Which moral theory is best?
Answer:
What moral obligations do we have about the environment
Explanation:
IM PRETTY SURE 95%
help plssss someone!!!!!
Answer:
#1
Explanation:
In your response, be sure to address all parts of the question. Use complete sentences; an outline or bulleted list alone is not acceptable.
“Americans often preferred not to think about the terrible war in Europe [the First World War]. By 1917, however, US citizens realized that ignoring the war or pretending it had nothing to do with them imperiled their future.
“. . . They realized that they had run out of options. Between 1914 and 1917, Americans had variously hoped that their nation could serve as an arbiter (as it had during the Russo-Japanese War, earning Theodore Roosevelt the country’s first Nobel Peace Prize), the leader of a global peace movement, the center of international arbitration, and the advocate of worldwide disarmament. By early 1917, however, the majority had come to two conclusions. First, as Charles Fremont Taylor, the editor of a Philadelphia-based magazine, articulated, ‘no nation can be a hermit in these days of steamships, railroads, telegraphs, ocean cables, wireless, etc.’ They no longer believed, as they had in 1914, that the Atlantic Ocean provided the country with sufficient protection from Europe’s wars. Second, they believed that their leaders had tried every option short of war only to find the country in an even more perilous geopolitical position.”
Michael S. Neiberg, historian, The Path to War: How the First World War Created Modern America, 2016
Using the excerpt, answer (a), (b), and (c).
(a) Briefly describe ONE piece of evidence used in the excerpt to support the argument made in the excerpt.
(b) Briefly explain how ONE piece of evidence not mentioned in the excerpt could be used to support, modify, or refute the argument in the excerpt.
(c) Briefly explain how ONE process discussed in the excerpt compares with the earlier United States decision to participate in the Spanish-American War.
Based on the excepts and historical facts, the following is true:
a. By pretending the war had nothing to do with them, they now found themselves in a more perilous geopolitical position. b. The Zimmerman telegram proved that no nation can truly be isolated in the modern era. c. The leaders tried to look for ways to avoid the First World War but against Spain they did not hesitate. Evidence from except supporting argumentThe argument in the excerpt was that ignoring the war would have disastrous effects on their future. The except supports this by stating that the U.S. was now in a more perilous geopolitical position because they had avoided war.
Evidence not in except but supportive of argumentThe Zimmerman Telegram sent by Germany to Mexico showed that the U.S. could be dragged into war even if they tried neutrality. Americans therefore realized that pretending the war didn't exist wouldn't help them.
Comparison with Spanish-American War participationThe United States was hesitant to join the first World War and tried to exhaust other options first. This was different from the Spanish-American War which they went into even though the Spanish had wanted peace.
In conclusion, U.S. behavior towards WWI and the Spanish-American war was different.
Find out more on the Zimmerman Telegram at https://brainly.com/question/863838.
HELP ME I HAVE 3 MINUTES LEFT
Answer:
B
Explanation:
By using the resources around them, plus forest soil is almost always very rich.
(If thats wrong i am so so so so sorry...)
Make inferences to explain your results (answer to the problem/question.) What do your results indicate the answer to the question is? Reference the Background section of the Project 4: Temperature of Chemical Reactions Introduction page. (5 pts)
Inference is an essential component of scientific research. It refers to drawing conclusions from the observed data or results of an experiment. When examining the data from the temperature of chemical reactions, several inferences can be made regarding the outcome of the experiment.
In this experiment, we were interested in determining how temperature affects the rate of chemical reactions. Our results indicate that as the temperature increases, the rate of the reaction also increases. This is consistent with the background information provided, which states that higher temperatures provide more energy to reactant molecules, which in turn leads to more collisions between molecules and a faster reaction rate.
The opposite is also true; as the temperature decreases, the reaction rate decreases as well.Our data also shows that the reaction rate increases at a faster rate as the temperature increases. This suggests that temperature has an exponential effect on the rate of chemical reactions. Additionally, our data indicates that the reaction rate reaches a plateau at higher temperatures.
This suggests that there is a maximum rate of reaction that can be achieved, regardless of how high the temperature is increased.Overall, our results indicate that temperature has a significant impact on the rate of chemical reactions and that increasing the temperature can increase the rate of the reaction up to a certain point.
For more questions on component
https://brainly.com/question/13221632
#SPJ8
Popper’s critics have argued that he did not have an adequate account of __________ science.
Group of answer choices
applied
mathematical
evolutionary
political
Answer:
Explanation:
Popper began his academic studies at the University of Vienna in 1918, and he focused on both mathematics and theoretical physics. In 1928, he received a PhD in Philosophy. His dissertation, On the Problem of Method in the Psychology of Thinking, dealt primarily with the psychology of thought and discovery. Popper later reported that it was while writing this dissertation that he came to recognize “the priority of the study of logic over the study of subjective thought processes” (1976, p. 86...
Popper's detractors claimed that he lacked an adequate account of mathematical science.
Who is Popper?It implies that in order for a theory to be considered scientific, it must be testable and potentially proven false. For example, observing a black swan can disprove the hypothesis that "all swans are white." Karl Popper contended that any research that wishes to be considered scientific must subject its hypotheses to falsification; that it must be tested in order to be proven incorrect. This is a far more rigorous approach than simply gathering evidence to support the hypothesis. Popper is well-known for his attempt to disprove the traditional positivist explanation of the scientific method by replacing induction with the falsification principle. Karl Popper proposed the Falsification Principle to distinguish science from non-science.To learn more about Karl Popper, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/3627007
#SPJ2
Which of the following is not one of the three branches of government in Australia and New Zealand?
A.
judicial
B.
legislative
C.
republican
D.
executive
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
best answer gets brainliest
Answer:
republican is the correct answer
Indicate how a possitive personal lifestyle plan may promote meaningfulness of life
Answer:
please give me brainlist and follow
Explanation:
A positive lifestyle is essential as it makes a person look forward and also promotes the meaningfulness of life. ... This eventually diminishes stress, improves wellbeing making the person feel better mentally. The person also starts to focus more on solutions than problems.
It is generally believed that there are three fundamental kinds of knowledge. Which of the following is not one of these?
Group of answer choices
skill or ability
acquaintance
epistemic knowledge
knowledge of facts
Answer:
acquaintance
Explanation:
because acquaintance is not knowledge and it is not fundamental
Rwanda experienced
a. rapid growth
b. government change
in the 1990's.
c. genocide
d. a hurricane
Answer:
genocide
Explanation:
The correct answer is C
Hope this helps:)
how many nanoseconds are in a second
Answer:
1000000000 nanoseconds ( in standard form )
hope this answer helps you!
Answer:
In standard form there are 1000000000 nanoseconds in a second.
While state courts will address violations of state laws, they are not equipped to handle cases in which __________. These cases are in the domain of the federal court system. A. there is a conflict between two or more states B. decisions are appealed C. state judges cannot reach a decision D. citizens sue the state government Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Answer:
A. there is a conflict between two or more states
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
edge 2021
What did Cyrus II hope to achieve by leaving local rulers in charge after he conquered them? (50 words)
Answer:
CYRUS??
Explanation:
The variety of climate zones in Southern Africa creates
a. extreme weather conditions
c. long winters
b. poor growing conditions
d. biodiversity
Answer:
Explanation:
b. poor growing conditions
Before a bill can be voted on by the General Assembly, it must be studied and reviewed by
D. A committee
Before the bill goes to the floor for voting, it is carefully studied and reviewed by a committee that pertains to the issue the bill is concerning.
Answer:
The Government whether that be local, state, or federal
Explanation:
Discuss where you believe that you rank on the social class ladder?
Help please
Answer: I would be one citizen level since I can't do anything. But later on i would be mid-high class citizen
Explanation:
The benefit of __________ is a reason why several Pacific Island governments retain ties to foreign powers.
A.
lower taxes
B.
international trade
C.
economic assistance
D.
government representation
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
C
Explanation:
because there getting help from other people
The German Nazis identified Jews as a "race," and race was believed to be biological. Nonetheless, the Jews were forced to wear a yellow Star of David because there was no reliable physical indicator of this supposed "race."
true or false
The assertion is accurate. There was no credible physical marker for this alleged "race," so the Jews were made to wear a yellow Star of David.
What is the yellow star of David?Jews were required to wear a Yellow Star-shaped emblem as identification across Nazi-occupied Europe. This was not a novel concept; even since the Middle Ages, numerous other societies have required their Jewish members to don identification badges.
The badges were frequently garishly yellow and printed on coarse yellow cloth. The word "Jew" was written in mock-Hebraic font, and the star, which stood in for the star of David, was highlighted in strong, black lines. Even infants in strollers were required to wear armbands or stars in some ghettos. Jewish businesses were also identified by a yellow star.
The star was meant to degrade Jews and single them out for prejudice and exclusion. Additionally, the policy made it simpler to locate Jews for camp deportation.
Learn more about the yellow star of David, from:
brainly.com/question/11216895
#SPJ2
Extreme dryness is a characteristic of the _____.
grasslands
desert
tropical rainforest
desert...... Hope it help
Explanation:
Stock Market
Crash
The Dust
Bowl
Bank
Holiday
What is an appropriate title for this graphic organizer?
Answer:
Stock Market
Explanation:
Its a more Professional name.
how long is the Pei Bridge
Answer:13 kilometers
Explanation:
The Confederation Bridge is nearly 13 kilometres long and is the longest bridge in Canada. It is also the longest bridge in the world that spans ice-covered water. More than 1 million people drive across the bridge to visit Prince Edward Island every year.
Which line of latitude is closer to the equator? 20°N or 30°S
1. Think of someone who has had a significant impact on you, for better or worse. Describe how this person has communicated with you and how their messages have influenced your self-concept and self-worth. I
How do you feel about the way Native American have been treated by Europeans
Diplomacy between Cheyenne and Settlers
Whether through diplomacy, war, or even alliances, Native American efforts to resist European encroachment further into their lands were often unsuccessful in the colonial era. This woodcut shows members of the Cheyenne nation conducting diplomacy with settlers of European descent in the 1800s.
Answer:During the colonial period, Native Americans had a complicated relationship with European settlers. They resisted the efforts of the Europeans to gain more of their land and control through both warfare and diplomacy. But problems arose for the Native Americans, which held them back from their goal, including new diseases, the slave trade, and the ever-growing European population in North America.
In the 17th century, as European nations scrambled to claim the already occupied land in the “New World,” some leaders formed alliances with Native American nations to fight foreign powers. Some famous alliances were formed during the French and Indian War of 1754–1763. The English allied with the Iroquois Confederacy, while the Algonquian-speaking tribes joined forces with the French and the Spanish. The English won the war, and claimed all of the land east of the Mississippi River. The English-allied Native Americans were given part of that land, which they hoped would end European expansion—but unfortunately only delayed it. Europeans continued to enter the country following the French and Indian War, and they continued their aggression against Native Americans. Another consequence of allying with Europeans was that Native Americans were often fighting neighboring tribes. This caused rifts that kept some Native American tribes from working together to stop European takeover.
Native Americans were also vulnerable during the colonial era because they had never been exposed to European diseases, like smallpox, so they didn’t have any immunity to the disease, as some Europeans did. European settlers brought these new diseases with them when they settled, and the illnesses decimated the Native Americans—by some estimates killing as much as 90 percent of their population. Though many epidemics happened prior to the colonial era in the 1500s, several large epidemics occurred in the 17th and 18th centuries among various Native American populations. With the population sick and decreasing, it became more and more difficult to mount an opposition to European expansion.
Another aspect of the colonial era that made the Native Americans vulnerable was the slave trade. As a result of the wars between the European nations, Native Americans allied with the losing side were often indentured or enslaved. There were even Native Americans shipped out of colonies like South Carolina into slavery in other places, like Canada.
These problems that arose for the Native Americans would only get worse in the 19th century, leading to greater confinement and the extermination of native people. Unfortunately, the colonial era was neither the start nor the end of the long, dark history of treatment of Native Americans by Europeans and their decedent’s throughout in the United States.
Explanation:
WHY does the author include the section "The Constitutional Convention"?
Answer:
What book are u talking about?
Explanation:
Answer:
The author included the section "The Constitutional Convection" because The point of the event was decide how America was going to be governed. Explanation:
Would paul McLean be likely to think of actors as artists
Answer I think artists
Explanation:
Why areas around bodies of water more populated?
Answer: Because of the water
Explanation: You see, a lot more people live near water because of the things that water provides, people can go fishing in water and eat fish, and also they can drink the water in the lakes, rivers, oceans, etc. There are a lot more benefits for living near water than far away from it.