Answer:
The Supreme Court of the United States
Explanation:
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the American judicial system, and has the power to decide appeals on all cases brought in federal court or those brought in state court but dealing with federal law.
Answer:
District Court
Explanation:
The crime of drug loitering requires:
A.proof of the possession of a controlled
substance.
B.proof of the delivery of a controlled
substance.
C.an action done in public that manifests the
intent to engage in illegal drug activity.
D.proof of the presence of a controlled
substance.
Answer:
an action done in public that manifests the intent to engage in illegal drug activity.
Explanation:
Only put the answer nothing other than that
How does a third party candidate play the role of spoiler in an election?
The third party candidate endorses (supports) one of the major party candidates, causing the opponent to win
The third party candidate takes votes away from one of the major party candidates causing their opponent to win
The third party candidate drops out of the race, eliminating their own chance of winning the election.
The third party candidate wins the election
Answer:
b) The 3rd party canidate takes votes away from one of the major party candidates causing their opponent to win
Explanation:
Roosevelt and Taft were both running for president against Woodrow Wilson. Roosevelt split from the Republican party to create the Bull Moose Party leaving Taft as the official Republican canidate. Because of this the Republican vote was split between Roosevelt and Taft. This lead to Woodrow Wilson's overwhelming victory.
Answer:
The 3rd party canidate takes votes away from one of the major party candidates causing their opponent to win
Explanation:
seven more than a number, x, is at least 20
Answer:
the answer should be 13
Yessssssssssssssssssssssss..
Define the constitutional principle of limited government in your own words
Answer:
I guess how I explain it A government where people rule for based on a philosophy
hope this helps please reward me brain list
Why must criminal statutes carefully and clearly define the prohibited behavior ?
The reason behind criminal statutes carefully and clearly defines the prohibited behavior, so that it can put the attention of people toward the legal action that is in the context of the behavior.
What is prohibited behavior?
There is a certain set of standards which are set inside by society for each and everyone so that there will be no among them about following those standards. It is not only about one segment.
It's about the full pattern on which society works, and this behavior also plays a very important role in some of the behavior standards set inside the society for each and everyone so that the dignity of each and everyone is maintained.
This behavior statement is used to note the types of behavior that fall under the criminal status. This is because it does not support the norms that have been set by society.
Thus, Some behavior patterns have been prohibited so that people always are a lot and always pay attention to what the legal action is for the behavior that has to be created or done with others.
Learn more about prohibited behavior from here:
https://brainly.com/question/28265251
#SPJ2
what you believe the people of Texas should do on gun control and gun violence issue
Answer:
Nah
Explanation:
Answer:
dont ask this
Explanation:
sir this is a Wendy's drive thru
A meeting could begin as a lawful assembly but
develop into an unlawful one.
True
False
Answer: True
Explanation:
Read the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed . . . and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have [the opportunity] for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
What part of the Sixth Amendment suggests that accused persons will be able to hear the charges against them?
Answer:
to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation
C. “informed of the nature and cause of the accusation”
Pls please if you do I will report you don’t put a random answer
HELPPP!!!!!! POINTS
All of the following are responsibilities of members of the community EXCEPT:
A volunteering to help the local government
B. participating in local government decision-making process
C. providing political interference to support projects in their neighborhood
D. organizing with other community members to create awareness of problems and solutions
Answer:
providing political interference to support projects in their neighborhood
Explanation:
I did the quiz c:
All of the following are responsibilities of members of the community except providing political interference to support projects in their neighborhood. The correct option is C.
What is the role of the community in community development?Community development is a process where organizations support residents in identifying and resolving issues that are significant to them. Community development gives residents more control over their lives and forges stronger, more cohesive communities.
Healthy communities are built from the ground up by their residents. They comprise everyone who participates in communal activities such as living, learning, working, playing, and praying. Community members may be recognized by friends and neighbors as the go-to person for getting things done or they may hold a formal leadership position in a community organization.
Thus, the ideal selection is option C.
Learn more about communities here:
https://brainly.com/question/9673382
#SPJ6
How does an appellate court differ from a trial court?
A. An appellate court usually has a jury.
B. An appellate court decides issues of fact.
C. An appellate court examines more witnesses.
D. An appellate court reviews another court’s decisions.
Explain your reasoning for choosing this answer:
Answer: B
Explanation: Appellate courts focus on questions of law, NOT on questions of facts like the trial courts. The appellate judges want to know whether the law was applied accurately. The appellate court overrules a trial court decision only if a very important legal error was made in the trial court.
Federal law prohibits the possession or
distribution of child p****graphy. To qualify as
a child, for the purposes of p****graphy law, the
person depicted in the photographs must be
under the age of 18.
True
False
What motivated Alexander Maconochie more in his committed work in penal colonies: his experience as a prisoner of war or his religious convictions?
Answer:
He spent three years as a prisoner of war
Explanation:
Alexander Maconochie was motivated for his committed work in penal colonies from his experience as a prisoner of war.
Who was Alexander Maconochie ?Alexander Maconochie was a Scottish naval commander, geographer, and reformer of the penitentiary system. In 1840, Maconochie was appointed Governor of Norfolk Island, a prison island where convicts were treated harshly and were regarded as lost causes.
When Maconochie arrived on the island, he quickly introduced measures that restored prisoners' dignity, achieving exceptional success in prisoner rehabilitation. These initiatives were well ahead of their time, and Maconochie was politically weakened as a result. His theories were largely neglected and forgotten, only to be resurrected as the foundation of modern prison systems a century later, in the mid- to late-twentieth century.
Therefore, from his experience being a prisoner of war, Alexander Maconochie got more in his committed work in penal colonies.
To learn more on Alexander Maconochie, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30574575
#SPJ2
Question 3
2 pts
Michael owns a bowling alley. The bowling alley serves pizza and
beer in the restaurant area only. Although workers try to keep the
equipment and bowling lane area clean, some patrons still get them
dirty with their greasy fingers. Patron Tammy breaks her big toe
when she loses grip on greasy bowling ball and drops it on her big
toe. Will the bowling alley be held liable for Tammy's broken toe?
eld liable because a patron made the
O No, the bowling alley will not be
bowling ball greasy.
How does the executive branch provide a check on the power of the legislative branch?
A. The vice presidents office is the speaker of the house of representatives
B. The cabinet determines if laws passed by Congress are constitutional
C. The president can veto bills passed by Congress
D. The executive department heads can fill vacant senate seats
please help:)))!!!
Answer:
C, the president can veto bills passed by Congress
Explanation:
hope this helped :)
What year did Jean Piaget publish his cognitive development theory?
Explanation:
1974 is when jean piaget published his devolpmwnt theory
Answer:
1953
Explanation:
Protection against being tried for the same crime multiple times is part of which
Amendment?
O Fourth
O Fifth
O Sixth
O Seventh
Answer:
Fifth
Explanation:
That's called double jeopardy, which is explained in the 5th amendment.
City speed limits are
MPH as a rule
In 2016, sports newscaster Erin Andrews and former wrestler Hulk Hogan were both awarded substantial monetary damages after winning their respective cases involving invasion of privacy. It is believed that the juries in both cases wanted to sanction the defendants by sending a clear message that individual's privacy must be respected regardless of who they are. The type of monetary damages awarded in these two cases are described as:
Answer:
Punitive damages
Explanation:
Based on the information given the monetary damages that was awarded in these two cases are described as PUNITIVE DAMAGES reason been that we were told that the juries has the intention to sanction the defendants who is the person that was found guilty after been accused of committing a crime by sending a clearer message to the defendants that individual’s or people's privacy have to be respected regardless of who they are in order to serve as a lesson to the defendants and to others who may have the intention of committing the same crime and as well to punish the defendants for the crime that was committed by him or her just as in the case of both Erin Andrews and Hulk Hogan who were awarded monetary damages after winning their cases that involve the invasion of privacy.
Therefore The type of monetary damages awarded in these two cases are described as: PUNITIVE DAMAGES
What was the primary purpose of the 1954 Model
Postmortem Examinations Act?
The purpose of the Model Post-Mortem Examinations Act is to provide a means whereby greater competence can be assured in determining causes of death where criminal liability may be involved.
Which statement describes one way the U.S. Constitution created a stronger federal government compared to the Articles of Confederation?
a.The federal government gained the power to disband state legislatures
b.The federal government gained the power to regulate trade between states.
c.The President of the United States gained the power to vote in the legislature.
d.The President of the United States gained the power to levy taxes on the states.
PLEASE LIKE RIGHT NOW ASAP
The president of the United States gained the power to levy taxes on the states
As an early childhood education caregiver, what would be a challenge of working with a helicopter parent
Answer:
As a caregiver you can't always do that because you are busy with other children but you can tell the parent that you can give them a review at the end of the day when they will pick up their child.
hope this helps!
A high school coach was attacked by an angry parent in the school parking
lot because his son was not allowed to play during the game. The coach won
damages that covered his medical expenses and the damage to his car. What
action could the jury take to send a message to all parents that the behavior
was extreme and shocking?
A. They could award nominal damages.
B. They could issue a mandatory injunction.
C. They could award punitive damages.
D. They could issue a permanent injunction.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I'd say this just for the fact that the parent didn't kill the coach, but still gave the coach some cash to fix up his car and the bills he had to pay for. it also depends on the type of injuries he got, I guess. thats my thoughts, anyways- I'm just a kid so I'm just giving some input.
Answer:
The answer is C. they could award punitive damages
Explanation:
Basing government decisions on known legal principles is known as which of the following? Democracy Republicanism Rule of law Separation of power
Answer:
Rule of Law
Hope this helps, even though it’s been 3 days
what is delegated legislation
If a truck is ahead in the left lane with a right turn signal on, stay away from its ___________ side.
Did the United States do enough to help stop geno-
cide in Rwanda? Explain your answer.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
in my opinion the u.s. didnt do enough to help stop the genocide. they should have provided medical serices for survivors and protected the rwandians in danger.
One who engages in categorical moral thinking is likely to approach the trolley car case by focusing on: a) Whether the trolley car driver can maximize the number of lives saved by diverting the trolley. b) Whether the trolley car driver can minimize the amount of suffering by diverting the trolley. c) Whether diverting the trolley car leads to the best consequences. d) Whether more people are made happy if the trolley car is diverted. e) Whether diverting the trolley car would violate people's rights. unanswered
Answer:
One who engages in categorical moral thinking is likely to approach the trolley car case by focusing on:
e) Whether diverting the trolley car would violate people's rights.
Explanation:
Immanuel Kant (1724 - 1804) proposed that a person should always respect the humanity in others and that the person should only act in accordance with rules that could hold for everyone. For example, he claimed that people have a duty to do the right thing even if that action produces a bad result. Thus, telling a lie in order to save a friend from jail is considered to be morally reprehensible by Kantism. For Kant, therefore, a person is doing something good if they are taking a morally right action.