Which of the following scenarios most accurately describes biofeedback?
A. Taneesha became sick after eating funnel cake at the fair, so now she gags every time she smells funnel cake.
B. Rune conditioned his dog to salivate to a buzzer. He then paired the buzzer with a light flash, and his dog eventually began to salivate to the light flash.
C. Julie's employer stopped paying her, so she stopped coming to work.
D. Stacy participated in an experiment in which she wore a heart-rate monitor, watched the readout of her heart rate, and received points based on how many beats per minute she reduced her heart rate.
E. Meike stopped giving her dog treats from the dinner table. Eventually, Meike's dog stopped begging. Two months later, the dog started begging again.​

Answer: 88%

Explanation:

6 out of 50 as a percentage is 12.00% out of 100.00%

So 100.00% Subtracted by 12.00% equals 88.00% or 88%

A service cooperative is a type of cooperative that provides a service rather than a good.

Service cooperatives are a sort of “consumer cooperatives” that help to address a communal need. They enable customers to meet their own demands, gain negotiating power and share earnings.

They are set up to allow members more control over the services they provide. Consumer cooperatives are frequently retail shops owned and operated by their members, such as food co-ops.

Therefore, a service cooperative is a cooperative that offers a service rather than a product.

To learn more about service cooperatives, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/9902152

#SPJ1

Some individuals concerned about global terrorism may advocate the free movement of people and relatively open immigration policy because they believe that restricting the movement of people may create resentment and further fuel terrorist ideologies. They may also argue that open immigration policies allow for the exchange of ideas and cultural understanding, which can help to promote peace and understanding.

On the other hand, some individuals concerned about global terrorism may advocate limits on the movement of people and relatively restricted immigration policy in order to better monitor and control the flow of people into and out of a country. They may argue that such measures can help to prevent the infiltration of terrorist groups and reduce the risk of terrorist attacks.

Personally, I find the argument for the free movement of people and relatively open immigration policy to be more persuasive. While it is important to take necessary precautions to protect national security, I believe that restricting the movement of people can have negative consequences and may ultimately do more harm than good in the long run.

Some individuals concerned about global terrorism may advocate the free movement of people and a relatively open immigration policy because they believe that restricting the movement of people may create resentment and further fuel terrorist ideologies

Some individuals concerned about global terrorism may advocate limits on the movement of people and relatively restricted immigration policy in order to better monitor and control the flow of people into and out of a country.

I find the argument for the free movement of people and a relatively open immigration policy to be more persuasive

They might also contend that welcoming immigration laws encourage intercultural dialogue and understanding, both of which contribute to global harmony.

However, in order to better monitor and regulate the movement of people into and out of a country, some people who are worried about international terrorism may support immigration restrictions and restrictions on how many people can enter the country at a time. They might contend that such actions can lessen the likelihood of terrorist attacks by preventing the infiltration of terrorist organizations.

Learn more about terrorism on:

https://brainly.com/question/14044861

#SPJ1