Answer:
To remain a world power.
Explanation:
Germany canceled payment on the great bulk of the reparations despite the fact that the pact wasn't as punitive as popular history portrays. Germany was spared a fortune because to the compulsory military reduction, which more than covered the cost of reparations. Remember that Germany had a tremendous military budget even in the years leading up to World War One. Also keep in mind that, previous to World War 1, Germany possessed the most expensive army and second-most expensive navy in the world. It was economically prudent to go from all of the earlier military spending to what are now regarded as Keynesian spending plans. The massive debt Germany incurred after World War One had a considerably greater impact on its post-war economy than reparations. Germany didn't raise any taxes to fund the war effort throughout World War One; instead, 90% of the expense was covered by a national debt that they planned to settle with the proceeds of victory. The economic troubles in Germany were worsened by this than by the reparations. After World War 1, Germany did, however, experience generally phenomenal economic expansion. Versailles's harm was greatly exaggerated for propaganda objectives. Nevertheless, compared to WW1, Germany's economic and military power was far lower at the start of WW2. Apart from technological advancements, the German army was significantly less effective than it had been during World War One, and Hitler had skewed the German economy unfavorably in favor of military rearmament, relying on plundering conquered countries to prevent an economic meltdown.
I definitely need help.
Read the excerpt below.
Competition between great nations is inevitable, but armed conflict in our world is not. More and more, civilized nations find ourselves on the same side -- united by common dangers of terrorist violence and chaos. America has, and intends to keep, military strengths beyond challenge -- (applause) -- thereby, making the destabilizing arms races of other eras pointless, and limiting rivalries to trade and other pursuits of peace.
— George W. Bush
West Point Speech June 1st, 2002
Which conclusion can be drawn about President Bush from this statement?
A.
He believes in the United States maintaining its role as a superpower to secure world affairs.
B.
He believes that with the help of other countries the terrorists can be defeated.
C.
He believes that the United States no longer needs to maintain a powerful military.
D.
He believes that effective diplomacy is the most important strategy for success in world affairs.
The conclusion that can be drawn from the above-stated statement is that president bush believes in the United States maintaining its role as a superpower to secure world affairs. hence option A is correct
What was the Bush doctrine's impact?According to the Bush Doctrine, US adversaries wage an ideological war against the country through terrorism. The US has a duty to defend itself by advancing democracy in areas that are active in order to weaken the justification for them.
In response, Bush proclaimed a global war, and Congress established the US Department of Homeland Security.
Hence option A is correct.
Learn more about President Bush:
https://brainly.com/question/15966123
#SPJ1
Answer:
He believes in the United States maintaining its role as a superpower to secure world affairs.
Explanation:
Edmentum
Select all the correct answers. What were the impacts of the Cuban Missile Crisis?
Compare and contrast (From White Supremacy to Barak Obama...) with (How the Republican Part Went from Lincoln to Trump)
and then write down a key theme (one from each video) about political parties. See if you can highlight key events and how each party responded to some of the different "party system" eras mentioned
The key theme in the video of From White Supremacy to Barak Obama is the history of the Democratic party and how they wanted to continue slavery and also their idea of Manifest Destiny and how the Presidency of Barack Obama came to be.
Who are Democrats and Republicans?This refers to the party system that exists in the United States of America as they have different ideals and beliefs.
Hence, we can see that the key theme in How the Republican Part Went from Lincoln to Trump talks about the earlier party, the Whigs who were divided about the issue of slavery, and the emergence of the Republic Party from Abraham Lincoln.
Read more about the American party system here:
https://brainly.com/question/2930321
#SPJ1
Which group of european immigrants was forced to settle in colonial america? convicts servants catholics germans
Answer:
the Pilgrims
Explain:
In 1620, a group of roughly 100 people later known as the Pilgrims fled religious persecution in Europe and arrived at present-day Plymouth, Massachusetts, where they established a colony. They were soon followed by a larger group seeking religious freedom, the Puritans, who established the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
Which of the following contributed to Canada’s difficulties in forming a robust national identity during the late nineteenth century?
A. Canada had bloody conflicts with indigenous peoples, just like the United States.
B. Canada depended on immigrants to settle its western territories.
C. There were sharp cultural divisions between French- and English-speaking Canadians.
D. Many western Canadians wished to unite with Alaska.
Canada’s difficulties in forming a robust national identity during the late nineteenth century because There were sharp cultural divisions between French- and English-speaking Canadians.
Canadian identity refers to the unique culture, characteristics, and condition of being Canadian, as well as the many symbols and expressions that set Canada and Canadians apart from other peoples and cultures of the world. There were sharp cultural divisions between French- and English-speaking Canadians so Canada is facing issues with forming national identity.
Learn more about national identity here: https://brainly.com/question/16025383
#SPJ4
by referring to the treaty of madina describe the relationship between the muslims and the non-muslims when the prophet arrived. (10)
Answer:
The Treaty of Medina between Muslims, Arabs that were not Muslims, and Jews was formalised in writing and accepted by all parties. The historians have kept it. Although Muhammad (pbuh) was referred to in the Quran as God's Prophet and Messenger, it was known that the Jews did not have to accept this for their own religious beliefs.
Explanation:
hope this helps!!
Why was Benito Mussolini able to seize control in Italy?
Europe dealt with a wide range of economic and political problems in the years following the First World War, most of which were unique to each nation's involvement in and aspirations during the war. People may today infer that Italy in particular was a country whose changes were a direct result of the political and economic impacts brought on by this battle. Therefore, it is crucial to consider how much the political and economic repercussions insured Mussolini and the Fascists' ascent to power while examining the many yet significant effects of WWI on Italy. So, even while the political consequences helped Mussolini consolidate his authority, it was the economic reforms that were actually necessary for Italy to enter its fascist age. First and foremost, Mussolini's rise to power was ensured by the political issues connected to the end of World War I. The fascist insurrection was heavily motivated by the post-war feeling of "Vittoria Mutilata" in Italy. This is due to the fact that, despite assuming the role of a victor, Italy's post-war liberal government, led by Prime Minister Orlando, was still threatened by its country's discontent with the fulfillment of the terms of the 1915 Treaty of London, as well as by past foreign policy humiliations in places like Ethiopia. With that, Italy made plans to renegotiate the territory exchanged under this pact, which precipitated the Fiume crisis. Simply told, this incident happened when Italian delegate D'Annuzio entered Fiume in an effort to topple it. The effort, however, was a failure since Orlando turned up control of the port to Yugoslavia. This contributed to Mussolini's ultimate ascent to power because it was believed that Orlando's left-leaning administration was unable to manage the intricacies of prior agreements and conflicts. As a result, the Italian government began to be seen as inefficient, leading citizens to seek shelter behind another system of governance in the face of their inevitable sense of damaged triumph. In this way, Mussolini's position as Italy's prime minister in 1922 had been developed since before Orlando's administration began addressing the national injustices brought on by the First World War. Thus, the possibility of a fascist-run Italy became a reality when the Prime Minister named Mussolini as the nation's new leader after attempting to impose martial rule. On the other hand, the effects of WWI on Italy’s economy were much more representative of the elements that allowed Mussolini to gain power than the aforementioned political ones. Case in point, consider the Fascist government’s decision to rebuild church-state relations with the Lateran Pacts (which was, in fact, one of the first measures introduced by the Fascist regime). Fundamentally, this pact – consisting of three key agreements – instituted the religious authority that Mussolini considered as crucial to the country’s national policies. For instance, religious figures could then participate in non-political activities, ensuring the Catholic community’s liberty to act as a secondary body to the Fascist administration. Overall, the Lateran Pacts prompted the support of a more extensive variety of people (e.g., Protestants, Orthodox), influencing Mussolini’s growing trajectory towards control. Most importantly, his economic plans are what primarily concretized the Fascist regime’s dominance in Italy – more so, as previously mentioned, than the political altercations. Essentially, Mussolini’s autarky (the economic plan) established, along with newly-conceived economic proposals, a nationwide sentiment of hope and pride that was, during the initial period of the post-war era, absent in civilian life. Specifically, this attitude was a product of nationalistic and patriotic allusions generated by the autarky. For example, the plan set to focus on grain production for the Fascists to attain their primary goal: let go of the necessity of external imports. Thereby, the inner production of grain allowed the new Italian government to disregard trade with other countries. Similarly, the economic plan proposed the Battle of the Lira – an idea focused on valuing the country’s currency in order to devalue Italian exports. With that, along with abolishing the need for trade and embellishing a newly-formed and desired national feeling, the plan acted upon the “Mussolini Law,” focused on the necessary land reforms in this system of government and, most prominently, economic ideology. In sum, Italy’s projects for their economy were essential to Mussolini’s rise to power; more than that, it was the most contributory factor.
How did ideas like the ones expressed in the passages contribute to the spread of Islam in northern Africa between 1200 and 1450 CE?
"I was sitting with Abu Darda' in the mosque of Damascus, when a man came to him and said: 'O Abu Darda,' I have come to you from Al-Madinah, the city of the Messenger of Allah (saw), for a Hadith which I have heard that you narrate from the Prophet (saw).' He said: 'Did you not come for trade?' He said: 'No.' He said: 'Did you not come for anything else?' He said: 'No.' He said: 'I heard the Messenger of Allah (saw) say: "Whoever follows a path in the pursuit of knowledge, Allah will make easy for him a path to Paradise. The angels lower their wings in approval of the seeker of knowledge, and everyone in the heavens and on earth prays for forgiveness for the seeker of knowledge, even the fish in the sea. The superiority of the scholar over the worshipper is like the superiority of the moon over all other heavenly bodies. The scholars are the heirs of the Prophets, for the Prophets did not leave behind Dinar of Dirham, rather they left behind knowledge, so whoever takes it has taken a great share."
"Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and earth, and the alternation of the night and the day, and the [great] ships which sail through the sea with that which benefits people, and what Allah has sent down from the heavens of rain, giving life thereby to the earth after its lifelessness and dispersing therein every [kind of] moving creature, and [His] directing of the winds and the clouds controlled between the heaven and the earth are signs for a people who use reason."
a. Monarchs decided to ally with the Islamic empire to prevent war.
b. The Islamic empire established a center of learning in the territories.
c. The Islamic empire conquered the people of the territory and had them convert to Islam.
d. The monarchs converted, then used their Islamic knowledge in government matters.
One way that Islam spread in Northern Africa was b. The Islamic empire established a center of learning in the territories.
How did Islam spread in North Africa?Apart from trade with Arab Muslims, North Africans picked up Islam thanks to the knowledge that they gained from local centers of learning.
These learning centers were set up to ensure that people could learn and appreciate the Islamic creed.
Find out more on Islamic centers of learning at https://brainly.com/question/15070909.
#SPJ1
describe the formation of temple in mesopotomia
The formation of temple in mesopotomia is The architecture of Mesopotamia is old architecture of the region of the Tigris–Euphrates river system (also known as Mesopotamia), encompassing several distinct cultures and traveling a period from the 10th millennium BC to the 6th century BC.
Among the Mesopotamian architectural achievements are the development of urban planning, the courtyard house, and ziggurats.
No architectural work existed in Mesopotamia; however, scribes drafted and managed building for the government, nobility, or royalty.
first temple mesopotomia is ziggurats
The first ziggurats were built in Ur, which was the capital city of Sumer, the first ever civilization. Made of mud bricks, each ziggurat was topped with a temple where it was believed the gods slept at night
How did temples materialize in Mesopotamia?The before cities emerged around temples, some cities designed as centers of business and some were imperial cities. Early settlers began to build and reconstruct temples at selected areas in their villages.
To learn more about Mesopotamian, refer
https://brainly.com/question/11369461
#SPJ9
What are two reasons why the US government sent expeditions into the Louisiana Territory in the 1800s?
The government wanted to learn about the strength of the French military in the area.
At that time, many Americans traveled there to search for gold and precious stones.
At that time, Americans knew very little about the geography of the area.
The government wanted to establish friendly ties with American Indians there.
The government wanted to prepare for a coming war against Great Britain.
ہے
Reset
Next
The two reasons why the US government sent expeditions into the Louisiana Territory in the 1800s are:
The government wanted to learn about the strength of the French military in the area. At that time, many Americans traveled there to search for gold and precious stones.What is the cause of sending expeditions into the Louisiana Territory by US.US did this so that they can know the strength of the French military in the area so as to prepare themselves.
Learn more about Louisiana Territory at:
https://brainly.com/question/856121
#SPJ1
Since Jackson's audience is mostly white citizens (Congress), and not the American Indians who are being forced off their land, why do you think the President goes out of his way to say that the Indian Removal Act will help the American Indians? In other words, what do you think his motive is in this particular case?
President Andrew Jackson might have ppushed for the Indian Removal Act in Congress because:
He wanted the support of the white legislators.What was the aim of the President?The President wanted Congress to see reasons why the Indian Removal Act was necessary. This push must have sailed easily as his audience was a white majority.
Many of them wanted the Cherokee nation to give way for the white settlers in Georgia. So his argument must have been persuasive.
Learn more about the Indian Removal Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/714974
#SPJ1
How did the phalanx formation help Spartan soldiers?
It provided them with new opportunities for trade.
It opened passageways for them to travel.
It brought in a new source of income for them.
It helped keep them safe from harm during battles.
The way the phalanx formations helped the Spartan soldiers was D. It helped keep them safe from harm during battles.
What is a Military Formation?This refers to the arrangement of soldiers in different ways in order to make them more effective in battle.
Hence, we can see that the Spartan soldiers were famous for their valor in battle and they had their phalanx formation to thank as each man protected his brother in battle at the sides.
Read more about the phalanx formation here:
https://brainly.com/question/9370779
#SPJ1
Answer: D. It helped keep them safe from harm during battles.
Explanation: hope this helps :)
Question 1 of 20
Look at the timeline below. Which of the following revolutionary events did
not take place at the same time as any others?
An Era of Revolution: 1775-1825
1800
1775
1776-1783: American Revolution
1789-1799: French Revolution
1791-1804: Haitian Revolution
1810-1825: Latin American wars for independence
1810-1821: Mexican War of Independence
OA. The French Revolution
OB. The Latin American wars for independence
C. The American Revolution
OD. The Haitian Revolution
1825
SUBMIT
The Revolution that did not take place at the same time as any other revolution was C. The American Revolution.
What happened in the Era of Revolutions?The United States led the way with the American Revolution from 1776 to 1783.
No other revolution took place during this time. The French and Haitian Revolutions ran concurrently and so did the Latin American and Mexican Wars of Independence.
Find out more on the Era of Revolutions at https://brainly.com/question/4229572.
#SPJ1
Until what’s the differ Between monotheism and polytheism
Answer:
Monotheism is the belief or doctrine that there is one—and only one—god or deity. The term is often used as a general label for specific religions (such as Judaism) that fall into this category. However, it can also be used outside the context of specific religions. For example, a person who does not profess belief in a specific religion but who believes there is one god could be said to adhere to the doctrine of monotheism.
A person who believes in only one god can be called a monotheist. The adjective form, monotheistic, is typically used in terms like monotheistic religions and monotheistic beliefs.
Polytheism is the belief or doctrine that there are multiple gods or deities. Like monotheism, the word polytheism can be used in the context of specific religions (such as Hinduism) or outside of formal religion.
A person who believes in multiple gods can be called a polytheist. The adjective form is polytheistic.
Explanation:
hope it help
How did the search for a labor force shape the English colonies and where was each
used? (Consider each of the following: Freemen/yeomen, indentured servitude, and
slavery)
One-half to two-thirds of the immigrants who migrated to the American colonies did so as indentured slaves. This is because starting a new life in the New World gave a glimpse of hope. In return for their passage, housing and food, lodging, and freedom dues, servants often worked anywhere from four to seven years. This is further explained below.
What is the labor force?Generally, collectively, the workforce of a certain company or nation.
In conclusion, One-half to two-thirds of the immigrants who arrived in the American colonies as indentured slaves had a glimpse of hope for a better life in the New World. Passenger, housing, board, and freedom fees were often exchanged for four to seven years of service by servants.
Read more about the labor force
https://brainly.com/question/13962639
#SPJ1
True or False?
The council of Nicaea 325 declared Jesus Fully divine
Answer:
true
Explanation:
just trust me
Which statements describe the shah’s rule of iran in the 1950s and 1960s? select 4 options.
Answer:
1. He suppressed free speech and other civil liberties
2. He fired and imprison many corrupt government officials
3. He established a land redistribution and reforms program
4. He invested in industrialization and modernization
history please help question in attachment
Answer:
its probably bc
Explanation:
Pretend you are an archeological scholar from a distant plant visiting Earth. You know nothing about the Human species and, when you arrive, there are no human beings left, only their artifacts (painting. sculpture, philosophy, plays, poetry, etc.).
How do you think the British felt about the riots that broke out in America protesting these
taxes?
This is largely because news reporting barely existed as we understand it today. Certainly, most ordinary people heard nothing about what was happening on other continents and were primarily interested in what was happening in their own, town/county/valley/etc, which is what was reported in the handbills and broadsheets of the time. Also, remember that it took around three months to cross the Atlantic, so news from the colonies travelled extremely slowly and was naturally superceded in relevence by more local news.
There were no news agencies at the time, and the publishers of handbills and broadsheets didn't keep any archives so there are very, very few examples of news reports left to study these days. Most of what survive are cartoons which were etched onto plates for printing (and there aren't many of those left), whereas printed media was temporary set-type which was re-set for the next printing.
This is why most of the historical record is from the political perspective, because Parliamentary sessions were recorded and political letters were archived. This is how we know that the tea taxes weren't a tax hike but a redistribution of where the tax liabilities fell.
It's also how we know that colonial taxes on most goods had consistently fallen for years, despite the crippling debt that the British treasury had sustained in their defence during the Seven Years War and the growing cost of maintaining their security in the subsequent years. It's how we know that the ensuring War of Independence wasn't a particularly popular war, with many MPs actively supporting the idea of giving the American colonies independence, partly for these economic reasons and partly out of support for the concepts of liberty which had been developing in Europe for almost a century and which had more recently crossed the Atlantic.
It's a fascinating bit of history. For America, the history is defined firstly by the need of the pre-Revolutionary factions to build a narrative to win support and later by the need for a unifying national myth to cement the new nation for the decades and centuries to come.
For Britain it was just another war, and a proxy one with France at that. It doesn't really have a lot of significance in the popular history of Britain, not because it was lost but because there are so many in Britain's history. While it wasn't insignificant (at all), it was a lot smaller and had much less of an effect on the course of British history than, say, the previous Seven Years War which it won and which also doesn't figure much in Britain's popular history, despite being the war that turned Britain into the first truly global power.
Following World War II, Great Britain:
A. lost many of its colonies.
B. had difficulty competing with the United States and Japan.
C. sought closer economic ties with Europe.
D. All of the choices are correct.
How did US leaders think people would respond to a military draft during WW1
what were the overall effects of the slave trade compromise over time
The philosopher preferred the innocence of the natural world to the corrupting influence of society and exalted the “noble savage”
Answer:
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Explanation:
Jean-Jacques Rousseau was the philosopher that matched the description given.
The philosopher praised the “noble barbarian” for preferring the innocence of the natural world to the corrupting influence of society. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques
What is society?A society is a group of people who contact one another on a regular basis or a big social group that shares the same spatial or social region and is typically subject to the same political authority and dominant cultural expectations.
A noble savage is a literary stock character who represents the concept of the indigence, outsider, wild person, an “other” who has not been “corrupted” by civilization, hence representing humanity's inherent goodness. The stereotype was frequently used in early anthropological works. Society.
Therefore, the corrupting influence of society. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques
Learn more about society here:
https://brainly.com/question/12006768.
#SPJ2
Who was Giuseppe Garibaldi?
A. the first leader of Italy after unification
B. a leader who freed Italy from Austria
C. the leader of the group Young Italy
D. a nationalist leader of southern Italy
Answer:
C. the leader of the group Young Italy
Please Write the journey of the invention of computer,radio,tv,train,mobile from impossible to possible in your own words. Write about any one in easy words I will mark brainliest to best one
please help me
Radio is a communication instrument invented by Guglielmo Marconi, which revolutionized the way in which communication was established in society.
The radio is an equipment that encompasses three important technologies of the period, telegraphy, transmitting waves and the wireless telephone, which manage to reach a large number of listeners.
Television was invented in 1920 by John Baird, who improved radio technology through the transmission of images, being one of the most widespread means of communication in the world.
After the invention of the TV, the first computer was developed, called ENIAC, created in 1943 and a high investment of more than 6 million dollars.
The cellphone is already the most recent invention, invented in 1973 by Martin Cooper, the prototype being the Motorola DynaTAC 8000X.
Regarding means of transport, the train was invented in 1814 by George Stephenson, revolutionizing the way in which people and equipment were transported from one place to another.
How does technology impact the world?Each technological invention is capable of generating development for society. Historically we see that each invention, from radio to cell phone, are improved versions and developed to make communication faster and more dynamic, increasing the quality of life in society.
Therefore, each invention is responsible for generating more and more innovation in society, to the point where we know it today, where the digital revolution impacted the world and made it multicultural and globalized.
Find out more about technological developments here:
https://brainly.com/question/2437329
#SPJ1
why is campaign finance reform is so important
Early humans had access to different kinds of foods, depending on the local geography. If a group lived in the
interior of the continent, what would they least likely have at meal time?
the meat of large animals
fish and shellfish
local plants
the meat of small animals
Answer:
fish and shellfish
Explanation:
? Question
Select the correct answer.
Which of these laws allowed states north of the 36°30' N latitude line to vote on whether to allow slavery?
O Fugitive Slave Act
O Kansas-Nebraska Act
O Compromise of 1850
O Missouri Compromise
Complete the activity to continue
Submit
Answer:
Its the Kansas-Nebraska act
Explanation: plaTO
The Missouri Compromise allowed states north of the 36°30' N latitude line to determine whether to allow slavery through popular sovereignty, maintaining a balance between free and slave states. Therefore, option D is correct.
Popular sovereignty refers to the principle that political power and decision-making authority ultimately rest with the people.
In the context of the Missouri Compromise, it means that the residents of each state in the United States were given the right to determine whether slavery would be permitted within their borders.
Instead of imposing a nationwide decision on the issue, popular sovereignty allowed for individual states to hold votes or make legislative choices regarding slavery.
This approach aimed to address the growing tensions between states favoring or opposing slavery by granting local autonomy in decision-making, albeit within a limited geographical scope.
Learn more about Popular sovereignty here:
https://brainly.com/question/1124552
#SPJ4
figure out and elucidate the most common national political economy system
Answer:
the traditional system is by the far most common form of economic organisation used by humans history
Explanation:
there are three main types of economics free market command and mixed the chart below compare free market and command economics mix economics are combination the two