What sort of features and values do you think should be included in a constitution?

Three structural factors that explain the high rates of violence and victimization against African Americans are injustice, racism, and discrimination.

Afro-American communities are all those communities made up of American descendants of Africans brought to America during the colony.

These communities have been affected over the years because since their arrival they were treated as objects and slaves and the situation was culturally perpetuated in the social imaginary despite the struggles for civil rights and the rights granted to them.

These factors are related to the case of George Floyd because the police brutality of which he was a victim was unjustified by imageries such as racism and discrimination in the individual who killed him. In addition, the case had worldwide visibility due to the ineffectiveness of the judicial system once the murder occurred.

Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/1001373

Answer:

true................

Answer:

As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution. The Supreme Court is "distinctly American in concept and function," as Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes observed.

Explanation:

I think it is fair that the US Supreme Court restricts the cases it can hear depending on how many people the judgment would touch, as there are some circumstances where it would only affect a very small group of people and it would be more just to uphold the lower court's ruling in those situations.

The Supreme Court may hear an unlimited number of cases, which would be one way to arrange it. The Court serves as both a protector and an interpreter of the Constitution since it is the ultimate arbitrator of law and is responsible for assuring that the American people get the promise of equal justice under the law.

According to Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, the Supreme Court is "distinctly American in concept and function."

Learn more about the US Supreme Court here:

https://brainly.com/question/3585397

#SPJ3

Answer: True

Explanation: Administrative law- Consists of the rules, orders, and decisions of administrative agencies. Dominant element in the regulatory environment of business.Administrative agency- A federal, state, or local government agency established to perform a specific function.Federal Agencies-At the national level, the cabinet departments of the executive branch include numerous executive agencies. Food and drug administration is an example is an agency within the US department of Health and Human services, theseexecutive agencies are subject to the authority of the president, who has the power to appoint and remove their officers.

If the police had no warrant saying they could go in or search Joe's house then the police could be in a certain amount of trouble as well seeing as Joe did not willingly let them in and they never had a warrant but Joe could be in a lot more trouble for being in the possession of drugs.

And smart homes should be more advanced to these kinds of things because they could have been fake cops, plus they had no warrant which leaves everyone in this situation at fault especially Joe for being in the possession of drugs and the possible false 911 call influenced on drugs either making him see things or think things, maybe even both.

Given that the police did not have a search warrant, and Joe did not open the door, those items to be inadmissible as evidence.

As advanced technology becomes more and more common, police might need to develop for interacting with smart homes where police agency of the future may have automated dispatchers answering 9-1-1 calls, autonomous police cars, artificial intelligence (AI) robots on patrol, biometric monitoring for officer health and safety, and smartphone applications to interact with smart city technology software systems to process and file data.

Thus, the admissibility of evidence means any document, testimony, or tangible evidence used in a Court of Law. All evidence is not allowed in the Court, only those evidence which is reliable and relevant are admitted in the Court of Law.

Generally, irrelevant evidence, unfairly prejudicial evidence, character evidence, evidence protected by privilege, and, among others, hearsay evidence is inadmissible.

With the dawn of artificial intelligence (AI), a slew of new machine learning tools promise to help protect us quickly and precisely tracking those who may commit a crime before it happens through data.

To learn more about inadmissible evidence and artificial intelligence (AI) refer

https://brainly.com/question/15713422

#SPJ2

Answer:

bus what languages not able to understand jio to Baramma that he looked another jio your Venum Kan Lulu gi

Answer:

ok i dont understand

Explanation:

this is weird

Explanation:

just wanted a quick email to restaurant for dinner on Sunday night for a few minutes of zeros to use patterns and a few more

Answer:

Specific income items identified and classified as taxable income.

Explanation:

The death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment." is not an argument used by death penalty supporters.

An argument refers to exchange of views or series of statements or words which are use in order to determine the degree of truth of another statement, conclusion or views.

It is normally a diverging statements.

Therefore, The death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment." is not an argument used by death penalty supporters because it does not support their views and interest.

Learn more about Argument from the link below.

https://brainly.com/question/509558

Answer:

It's B, To curb the frequent occurrence of smuggling after the US Navy was disbanded

Answer:

fun

Explanation:

Because a there is no such thing as a fun call and it doesn't exist,I have never heard someone talking about a fun call.

probably a few because some of them fight very hard and win alot of cases in a good or bad situation.

Answer:

work no pay rule. The CFO takes the decision to withhold payments.

Answer:

false

Explanation:

because it's a way of making wrong things which will lead to prison

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Cos they have been bestowed with the power by the Government of their country and also they have enough financial fund and weapons to be able to combat crime

Yes the law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own because they have been given authority by the government of their nation, as well as sufficient resources and weapons to fight crime.

A law enforcement agency (LEA) is any government organization tasked with upholding the law. It is referred to as operating inside a jurisdiction when LEAs have some kind of restriction on how they can use their authority. By allowing the exchange of information required for law enforcement between LEAs inside those countries, LEAs that operate across a number of countries, such as Europol, tend to support law enforcement efforts rather than actively enforcing laws. An international law enforcement agency, like Interpol, has authority over and/or conducts operations across national borders in several different countries. A multinational law enforcement agency is one that employs people from various nations but normally only operates in one nation or region of a nation.

To learn more about law enforcement agencies, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14328441

#SPJ2

You look amazing. : )

The sentencing guideline is a formula that is used by judges to impose criminal sentences.

The sentencing guidelines helps in the court of law by giving a structure at the stage where the offence of the person is being defined and other elements are being considered in the act that was committed.

In simple terms, the sentencing guideline is a non binding guideline that serves by giving information regarding sentences in the law court.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/15152861?referrer=searchResults

Here, Community structures refers to an uniformed & authorized way of buildings layout, road routes, railroad etc, which follows the community plan.

In conclusion, the involvement of this plan is important in solving burglaries problems because its instills Fear of security and thus discourage attempted burglary from occupant of the community.

Read more on this here

brainly.com/question/24447737

Answer:B

Explanation:

Critical infrastructure such as utilities and banking is responsibility of State government. Thus option (B) is correct.

A government is the political system by which a country or community is administered and regulated. The most of the key words commonly used to describe governments are  monarchy, oligarchy, and democracy.

A government is a system of order for a nation, state, or another political unit. A government is responsible for creating and enforcing the rules of a society, defense, foreign affairs, the economy, and public services.

While the responsibilities of all governments are similar, those duties are executed in different ways depending on the form of government.

Some of the different types of government include a direct democracy, a representative democracy, socialism, communism, a monarchy, an oligarchy, and an autocracy.

Critical infrastructure such as utilities and banking is responsibility of State government. Therefore, option (B) is correct.

Learn more about government here:

brainly.com/question/17166802

#SPJ6

Answer:

Programs such as diversion, restitution, probation, parole, pardon, and various provisions for temporary release from prison or jail are included in the Community Based Corrections being implemented by the corrections pillar of our criminal justice system.

Explanation:

In general, the national prisons housed more serious offenders, and those serving short-term sentences were held in local facilities. The prison system at the national level was supervised by the Bureau of Prisons of the Department of Justice. The government maintained six correctional institutions and penal farms.

Answer:A gunshot victim's clothing should be preserved, as a GSR distribution pattern can assist in distance determinations. The clothing must be carefully removed, not folded, and allowed to dry. Clothing from both victim and potential shooters should be seized as it may contain GSR, blood spatter, glass fragments, other forms of trace or transfer evidence, or tears, damage, or soil patterns that may be useful for reconstruction purposes. The presence of trace evidence or damage to the clothing may be used to corroborate a statement regarding movement or events during and after the shooting incident. Documentation of possible GSR (and other evidence) on clothing is best accomplished at the crime scene before packaging. oc.

Explanation:

The event that is TRUE about the presence of gunpowder residue on a person is Every person who fires a gun will have visible gunpowder on their hands. Thus the correct option is A.

Gunpowder has had a variety of uses, such as those related to explosives, fireworks, weapons, and armaments. The development of gunpowder is a significant historical development since it altered military tactics and brought about political and cultural transformation in Europe.

If someone has gunshot residue on their hands, it means they will either have recently shot a gun, handled a gun or something with trace evidence on it, or were nearby when the gun was fired.

Therefore, option A Every person who fires a gun will have visible gunpowder on their hands is appropriate.

learn more about Gunpowder, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13909238

#SPJ2

Nonaccidental physical injuries children suffer at the hands of their parents occur along a continuum that ranges from mild to severe. At the outer edges of this continuum, one might find, on the one hand, a slight swat to the buttocks, and on the other, a brutal beating. In the United States, the normative consensus appears to be that outsiders to the family are appropriately concerned only when the physical injury at issue causes serious harm; any injury short of a serious one is exclusively “family business.”Consistent with this consensus, all states’ laws permit the use of “reasonable” corporal punishment; simultaneously, they all prohibit non accidentally inflicted serious injury. The latter is generally denominated abuse, although some states classify milder but still impermissible injuries as neglect, or simply “inappropriate discipline.” Thus, being able to distinguish between reasonable corporal punishment and maltreatment—whether this is formally denominated abuse or neglect—is critical for the relevant actors: parents who use corporal punishment as a disciplinary tool, child protective services (CPS) staff who are required by statute to intervene in the family to protect children subject to or at risk of abuse, and courts adjudicating issues arising in connection with these cases. The integrity of the distinction and of the methodology employed to make it is also critical for a society that is prominently committed to both family autonomy and child welfare, and in particular to protecting the integrity of the family when it promotes (or at least does not harm) child welfare, and to intervening in the family when it fails in its related obligations.Unfortunately, few if any states have sufficiently defined the relevant terms “reasonable corporal punishment” or “maltreatment” (abuse or neglect) to consistently guide the relevant actors (those in a single system) in their exercises of discretion; nor have they established a coherent methodology for sorting injuries along the continuum of nonaccidental physical injuries. That administrative regulations and policies promulgated by state and local CPS departments often narrow agency discretion helps CPS itself to be more consistent and may help families know what to expect when they are dealing with CPS. But because appellate courts do not appear to give much deference to agency interpretations of the statutory definitions, these regulations and policies do little to guide the courts’ own exercise of discretion. Moreover, to the extent that the law in statutes and judicial opinions is either less precise or even different from the law as it is applied by CPS, the public and parents are inevitably confused or misled. As a result, decisionmaking about whether an injury or incident remains in the realm of family business or has crossed the line into the impermissible varies, reflecting a multiplicity of purely personal viewpoints, religious and political ideologies, and academic or disciplinary training and requirements. In turn, institutional treatment of and outcomes for children and families are often inconsistent. The status quo has been defended or at least explained on several grounds. The vagueness of abuse definitions has been consistently upheld on policy grounds—specifically on the argument that it is important for authorities to retain flexibility to call injuries as they see them given that, particularly in a diverse society, abuse might appear in unexpected forms.

Answer:

PLATO

Explanation: