What is the right answer?

Answer:

rhyme scheme.

Explanation:

The given lines are an example of rhyme scheme.

A rhyme scheme can be defined as the sound at the end of each verse in a poem. This is a repetitive sound that occurs at the end of each verse in a song or poem. There are various types of rhyme schemes in literature such as internal rhyme, slant rhyme, etc.

In the given lines, the end of each verse rhyme with each other, that is sky and high. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.

Answer:

answering for the points

Explanation:

Answer:

have a nice day and you are amazing in every way

Explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer is A.

Explanation:

Answer:

Anne Frank is a story that shows how cruel a person can truly be. It shows the evil that was preformed by the Hitler was towards Jewish people, even a little girl like Anne was taught she was less than Germans because of her heritage. She knew and had to live with how awful other Jewish people, even people she knew, were treated. How they were killed and abused, though that may be an understatement. Though her story shows the of cruelty, it also shows how good and generous a person can be. Miep Gies put her own safety on the line to help protect not only the Frank family, but also the Van Pel family and Fritz Pfeffer. She kept them safe as best as she could for as long as she could. Even in a time where most people would turn their backs on people in need and only think about themselves. Not only that, but Anne and her famil remained good and loving people which seems almost impossible given the circumstances they were living in. On two very different sides of the spectrum, a person can be truly evil and vile. On the other end, a person can be good and loving and generous.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Mayella Ewell lies on the witness stand out of fear for her father Bob Ewell and embarrassment over her attraction to Tom Robinson. She claims to the jury that Tom beat and assaulted her, but her father actually beat her after he caught her cuddling and kissing an African American.

The term "attraction" refers to an emotional, romantic, physical, or aesthetic interest, desire, or affinity. A lot of individuals think that attraction is only romantic. But many emotions—including being interested in someone, praising their attractiveness, and having sexual feelings—qualify as an attraction.

The majority of people are primarily impacted by someone's physical appearance before becoming more or less attracted to someone over time depending on other criteria, such as likeness, personality, and reciprocal interest.

She was aware of the horrendous treatment that other Jews, including individuals she knew, received and had to live with it. Though it might be an understatement, how they were murdered and mistreated. Her tale demonstrates harshness, but it also demonstrates the goodness and generosity of others.

Therefore, Ewell and embarrassed over her attraction to Tom Robinson.

Learn more about the attraction here:

https://brainly.com/question/497462

#SPJ2

Answer:

pls answer meeeeeee

Explanation:

love u

omg i literally love romance could you do that? or horror but I know that's not the easiest to write. I love like corny romance and stuff haha

Answer:

catch him by the neck change the voice

Explanation:

catch him by the neck change the voice

Answer:

Used intentionally in the right context, repetition can be a powerful tool to ... Writers and speakers also use repetition to give words rhythm.

Explanation:

Literary writers constantly use the literary device of repeated words. I think the only type of repetition which is bad is sloppy repetition. Repetition which is ...

Answer: Germany and England

Explanation:

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

William has these reactions because he envies Margot. He is jealous of Margot's expierence of the sun and on the earth

Explanation:

Answer:

i usually say i have bad internet and my meetings lag if the camera is on.

Explanation:

Answer:

yeah have my computer hooked up to my TV cant use your camera for that since i broke my screen

Explanation:

Answer:

Lines 65-75 Identify details in the paragraph of how Lincoln and Davis were similar. ... Davis believed in enslavement, he felt superior to blacks. On the other hand, Lincoln thought slavery was wrong. He thought slavery should not be spread, but abolished.

Answer:

Billie Jo and her father will be eating alone this year because her mother and baby brother had died.

Explanation:

Karen Hesse's "Out of the Dust," tells the story of and narrated by the protagonist Billie Jo Kelby and her family's life during the Great Depression. The struggle amidst the poverty, the misfortune of the fire incident, and the desire for escape led Billie Jo to run away, but only to return home after she realized a newfound admiration and love for her distant and grieving father.

An incident at the house where her mother mistakenly used kerosene (thinking it was water) to make coffee for her husband led not only to her death but also kills the newborn baby. And because of this, Billie Jo and her father are left alone in the house, grieving but unable to do anything about it.  

Answer:

The audience knows that it was Iago who made Othello jealous of Desdemona.

Explanation:

In "Othello", a tragedy by William Shakespeare, Othello and Desdemona are virtually a perfect couple. They love each other deeply, being faithful and respectful. However, Iago convinces Othello that Desdemona is cheating on him with Cassio. He twists words and actions, using small details such as a handkerchief Othello has given his wife, all to make Othello miserable.

In Act III, scene IV, Othello is rude to Desdemona after having listened to Iago. However, when Iago interacts with Desdemona and Emilia afterward, he acts as if he cannot fathom an angry Othello, as if he has no idea why Othello would be rude and jealous. This is an example of dramatic irony. The characters do not know Iago is the one behind the misunderstandings, but the audience does.

Answer: (sorry if this isn't good enough, I know so little of Greek and Roma old history)

Hercules, a roman and Greek god from roman mythology and past, Hercules a man that was and still is one of the most famous Greco-Roman legendary heroes. Son of Zeus, and a slayer of beats,

this man has dozen and more stories about him, to slaying the The Nemean lion. The Nemean lion was a vicious monster to the Greeks, slay and scarified to Zeus by The famous Hercules

and the well known story of the The Capture of Cerberus  

or known as the Three-headed dog, a short tempted mammal, All through He, Hercules, didn't slay such a beast, he returned the beast the king, Hera at his palace but turns out Zeus was there, and he grants Hercules immortality. He was very proud of his son, and Then was access to go the heavens.

but these characters Hercules, Athena, Helen of Troy, many beasts and etc. are all going around the character Zeus, his son, and these other godly beings

Answer:

C: Generous

Explanation:

i got it right LOL

hope this helps :D

BAnswer:

Explanation:cuz

Answer:

THE ANSWER IS D

Explanation:

They used metal detectors

Explanation:

Robert Ballard and Jack Grimm's quests to find the Titanic, differed because:

The Titanic was a huge and monumental vessel that hit an iceberg and sank, with a lot of people on board the ship dying. It was an architectural marvel of its time as some of the modifications of the ship were ahead of its time.

Many years after the sinking of the Titanic, a lot of people went on quests to find the Titanic which for the most part was unsuccessful.

Among these men was Robert Ballard who made an attempt to go on underwater dives and surface scans using magnetometers but because he did not have enough money, he did not continue.

In contrast, Jack Grimm was wealthy and had the money to buy the best and latest equipment to search for the Titanic but he was also unsuccessful.

Robert Ballard made another attempt to try the Titanic and this time he was successful.

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/20491670

Answer:

She did not want to get in Trouble

Explanation:

Answer:B

Mark me brainliest if this helps,

Until the past decade, scientists, research institutions, and government agencies relied solely on a system of self-regulation based on shared ethical principles and generally accepted research practices to ensure integrity in the research process. Among the very basic principles that guide scientists, as well as many other scholars, are those expressed as respect for the integrity of knowledge, collegiality, honesty, objectivity, and openness. These principles are at work in the fundamental elements of the scientific method, such as formulating a hypothesis, designing an experiment to test the hypothesis, and collecting and interpreting data. In addition, more particular principles characteristic of specific scientific disciplines influence the methods of observation; the acquisition, storage, management, and sharing of data; the communication of scientific knowledge and information; and the training of younger scientists.1 How these principles are applied varies considerably among the several scientific disciplines, different research organizations, and individual investigators.

The basic and particular principles that guide scientific research practices exist primarily in an unwritten code of ethics. Although some have proposed that these principles should be written down and formalized,2 the principles and traditions of science are, for the most part, conveyed to successive generations of scientists through example, discussion, and informal education. As was pointed out in an early Academy report on responsible conduct of research in the Suggested Citation:"2 SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLES AND RESEARCH PRACTICES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.×

Add a note to your bookmark

health sciences, “a variety of informal and formal practices and procedures currently exist in the academic research environment to assure and maintain the high quality of research conduct” (IOM, 1989a, p. 18).

Physicist Richard Feynman invoked the informal approach to communicating the basic principles of science in his 1974 commencement address at the California Institute of Technology (Feynman, 1985):

[There is an] idea that we all hope you have learned in studying science in school—we never explicitly say what this is, but just hope that you catch on by all the examples of scientific investigation. It's a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty—a kind of leaning over backwards. For example, if you're doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid—not only what you think is right about it; other causes that could possibly explain your results; and things you thought of that you've eliminated by some other experiment, and how they worked—to make sure the other fellow can tell they have been eliminated.

Details that could throw doubt on your interpretation must be given, if you know them. You must do the best you can—if you know anything at all wrong, or possibly wrong—to explain it. If you make a theory, for example, and advertise it, or put it out, then you must also put down all the facts that disagree with it, as well as those that agree with it. In summary, the idea is to try to give all the information to help others to judge the value of your contribution, not just the information that leads to judgment in one particular direction or another. (pp. 311-312)

Many scholars have noted the implicit nature and informal character of the processes that often guide scientific research practices and inference.3 Research in well-established fields of scientific knowledge, guided by commonly accepted theoretical paradigms and experimental methods, involves few disagreements about what is recognized as sound scientific evidence. Even in a revolutionary scientific field like molecular biology, students and trainees have learned the basic principles governing judgments made in such standardized procedures as cloning a new gene and determining its sequence.

In evaluating practices that guide research endeavors, it is important to consider the individual character of scientific fields. Research fields that yield highly replicable results, such as ordinary organic chemical structures, are quite different from fields such as cellular immunology, which are in a much earlier stage of development and accumulate much erroneous or uninterpretable material before the pieces fit together coherently. When a research field is too new or too fragmented to support consensual paradigms or established methods, different scientific practices can emerge

Answer:

Either A or B

Explanation:

Once a scientist has finished with their experiment, Other scientists usually repeat the experiment to see if it's correct, and usually talk about it and see, if it's wrong, what could be done to fix it.

Answer:

I'm assuming you mean text messaging, if not I'll also put formal text starters on here if it were like a book club. So first text messaging,

* How was your day?

* What should I eat for dinner?

Next formal text reading,

* How do we see character development throughout the story?

* What did you learn from the content?

Explanation: I used my think brain.

Answer:

One of my biggest fears.... are apple trees. It all started a few years back, when my house burnt down. The detectives said it was from a light sparking, but I knew better. I saw that look on the apple tree in my front yard. The apple tree had a suspicious look to him. Another time, I was walking in my front yard, and an apple fell on my head. Again, the apple tree had that same suspicious look. I looked for a new house, but every house had an apple tree! I couldn't stay in a world filled with apple trees. Who knew what they would do next! I had to move planets. I said goodbye to my family, and I started flying around the universe, looking for a planet without apple trees. But, as I was flying, the motor on my flying saucer stopped. I looked in the motor, and there was an apple stuck in it! It must have been the apple tree. My flying saucer began to fly out of control, and I crash landed onto Earth. That's how I ended up here.

Explanation:

Answer:

The birds and the trees

Explanation:

I knew the Earth was strange when I arrived here. Never in my 80 years had I found a planet as chaotic as this one. There were humans everywhere and they were all being watched. I arrived at a apple tree park and in it was full of birds.

The birds seemed different. I looked closer and found cameras in the bird's eye. Shocked as I was, I ran to warn a human, but suddenly I was tied up. The birds had caught me! I was dragged to one of the apple tree that turned into a secret tunnel.

The tunnel led me to the Area 51 base and here we are.

I'll get my Oscar now. :D

Answer:

Or is simply the word you use to give either a choice or to talk about two different things.

Explanation:

The first way to use "or"

"Hey, would you like to eat pizza OR tacos?"

A second way

"Ann said that she never took it. OR she could be lying to you so that she can keep it."

Does that make sense?

Answer:

A dependent clause

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

If this was a question it would be fine- Who fixed my car?

But it's a statement. Who is the who that fixed your car?

Answer:

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that everybody in the world has certain fundamental rights such as freedom of expression, equal protection under law, and equal pay for equal work.

Explanation:

In the passage "everybody in the world have certain fundamental rights," we have a subject-verb agreement problem. The subject of this clause is "everybody". Even though the word "everybody" conveys the idea of there being several people included, the word itself is singular. Therefore, the verb referring to it should also be in its singular form. That is why the use of "have" is incorrect. In its place, we should use "has", the simple present third-person form of the verb. Thus, the correct clause would be "everybody int he world has certain fundamental rights."