What is the error in the solution of the proportion shown at the right?

A. The second line should be 2x + 18 = 3x making the final answer 18 = x

B. The second line should be 2x + 27 = 3x making the final answer 27= x

C. The second line should be 3x + 9 = 2x making the final answer 9 = x

D. There is no error

Answer:

a = 2.1

Step-by-step explanation:

-3.7a + 1.7 = -6.07​

-3.7a = -7.77

a = 2.1

The number of hours that it will 2000-km flight would be = 2.5 hours.

The number of hours can be determined when a straight line is being drawn from the origin of the graph and allowing it to pass through most of the interceptions.

Therefore, form the graph, the amount of hours that it will take the 2000-km flight would be = 2.5 hours approximately.

Learn more about graphs here:

https://brainly.com/question/25799000

#SPJ1

The 0.85p in the expression represents the price of the dress after removing the discount

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Sofia calculates that she must pay the following to buy the dress

p - 0.15p + 0.07(0.85p)

The 0.85p in the expression represents the price of the dress after removing the discount

Hence, 0.85 is the discounted price

Read more about discounts at

https://brainly.com/question/12965533

#SPJ1

The speed of the van traveling south is 46 miles per hour. The correct option is  (G) 46.

Let's call the speed of the van traveling south "x" in miles per hour. Then, the speed of the van traveling north is "x + 10" miles per hour.

We know that the vans have been traveling for 2.5 hours, and that they are 255 miles apart. This means that the total distance traveled by both vans is 255 miles:

Distance traveled by the van traveling south + Distance traveled by the van traveling north = 255 miles

Using the formula distance = speed × time, we can express the distances traveled by each van in terms of their speeds and the time they traveled:

Distance traveled by the van traveling south = x × 2.5 = 2.5x

Distance traveled by the van traveling north = (x + 10) × 2.5 = 2.5x + 25

Substituting these expressions into the equation above, we get:

2.5x + 2.5x + 25 = 255

Simplifying this equation, we get

5x + 25 = 255

Subtracting 25 from both sides, we get:

5x = 230

Dividing both sides by 5, we get:

x = 46

Therefore, the speed of the van traveling south is 46 miles per hour. Answer: (G) 46.

Learn more about distance here : brainly.com/question/26046491

#SPJ1

Answer: $3.75

Step-by-step explanation:

Since apples cost $1.25 per pound and she needs to buy 3 pounds, the total cost would be $1.25*3 = $3.75.

Without knowing the specific transformation that maps J, K, I, and M to J', K', I', and M't is not possible to find the exact algebraic rule for the coordinates

Given that

J' (-2,1), K' (1,2), I' (2,-1), M' (1,-3)

Let's say we have a transformation that maps points J, K, I, and M to J', K', I', and M', respectively. Then, the algebraic rule for the coordinates of the transformed points can be found as follows:

Let T represent the transformation that maps points J, K, I, and M to J', K', I', and M', respectively.

Let (x, y) be the coordinates of a point P.

To find the coordinates of T(P), we can apply the same transformation to the coordinates of  P.

Read more about transformation at

https://brainly.com/question/27224272

#SPJ1

The mean is 41.37
The Median is 36

The first step is to arrange the number orderly

31, 32,34,35,37,38,40,84

The mean is

= 31 + 32+34+35+38+37+40+84/8

= 331/8

= 41.37

The median

= 35+37/2

= 72/2

= 36

The mode
= N/A

Read more on mean here
https://brainly.com/question/3444558

#SPJ1

There are 60 apples in the bag

Let y represent the total number of apples that is in the bag

36/y= 60/100

cross multiply both sides

60y= 36×100
60y= 3600

Divide both sides by the coefficient of y which is 60

60y/60= 3600/60

y= 60

Hence the total number of apples in the bag is 60 apples

Read more on apples here

https://brainly.com/question/10150579

#SPJ1

The perimeter of the figure is as follows

1. 93 cm

2. 42 cm

3. 45 cm

Perimeter is the total length of the boundary of a two-dimensional shape or figure. In other words, it is the sum of the lengths of all the sides or edges of the shape.

Perimeter is measured in units of length, such as centimeters, meters, or feet, depending on the system of measurement being used.

The perimeter of the figures is solved as follows

1.

= 12 + 15 + 20 + 11 + 7 + 10 + 6 + 12

= 93 cm

2.

= 8 + 12 + 5 + 5 + 12

= 42 cm

3.

= 15 + 15 + 15

= 45 cm

Learn more about perimeter at

https://brainly.com/question/19819849

#SPJ1

The area of the given figure is 20cm².

What is a kite?

A quadrilateral called a kite has two pairs of sides that are each the same length and are next to one another.

What is area of a kite?

A kite's diagonals are perpendicular. The area of a kite is calculated as half of the diagonal product, which is the same as the area of a rhombus. The formula: can be used to express the area of a kite.

Area of Kite =1/2×D1×D2

D1 is the kite's long diagonal.

D2 is the kite's short diagonal.

when we draw the figure in coordinate system we find that it is shape of a kite,

so area of kite = 1/2*4*4+1/2*4*6

                         = 20 cm²

To know more about kite visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31239785

#SPJ1

Answer:

Θ ≈ 21.62°

Step-by-step explanation:

using the sine ratio in the right triangle

sinΘ = [tex]\frac{opposite}{hypotenuse}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{7}{19}[/tex] , then

Θ = [tex]sin^{-1}[/tex] ( [tex]\frac{7}{19}[/tex] ) ≈ 21.62° ( to the nearest hundredth )

Answer:

Set your calculator to degree mode.

sin(72°) = x/25

x = 25sin(72°) = about 23.8 feet

If the  domain is{ -12,-7,0,4,12} and range is {0,1,2} then the function is  {(4, 1), (-7, 0), (12, 2), (0, 0), (-12, 1)}

The domain of a function is the set of values that we are allowed to plug into our function.

This set is the x values in a function such as f(x).

The range of a function is the set of values that the function assumes

domain is{ -12,-7,0,4,12} range is {0,1,2}

The function that has the given domain and range is:

{(4, 1), (-7, 0), (12, 2), (0, 0), (-12, 1)}

Therefore, the function is {(4, 1), (-7, 0), (12, 2), (0, 0), (-12, 1)}

To learn more on Functions click:

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ1

Which function has the following domain and range?

Domain: {-12, - 7, 0, 4, 12}

Range: {0, 1, 2}

O {(-12, 12), (0, 2)}

O {(4, 1), (-7, 0), (12, 2), (0, 0), ( − 12, 1)}

O {(-12, 0), ( – 7, 1), (0, 2), ( – 4, 5), (3, -1)}

O {(0,4), (2, 12), (1, -7), (0, - 12), (1, 0)}

The probability that Amber does not arrive at work by 9 am is calculated by summing the probabilities of two scenarios: the bus being on time and Amber not arriving by 9 am and the bus being late and Amber not arriving by 9 am. The calculated probability for her late arrival at work is 17/60.

The subject of this problem is probability. There are two scenarios in which Amber may not arrive at work by 9 am: either the bus is on time but she does not arrive by 9 am or the bus is late and she does not arrive by 9 am.

First, let's consider the probability that Amber's bus arrives on time, which is said to be 5/6. If her bus is on time, the probability that she arrives at work by 9 am is 4/5, which means that the probability she does not arrive by 9 am is 1-4/5 = 1/5. Therefore, the probability that the bus is on time and she does not arrive by 9 am is 5/6 * 1/5 = 1/6.

Alternatively, consider the scenario where the bus is late. We can find the probability of this by subtracting the probability that the bus is on time (5/6) from 1, so the probability that the bus is late is 1/6. If her bus is late, the probability she arrives at work by 9 am is 3/10, implying that the probability she does not arrive by 9 am is 1-3/10 = 7/10. Hence, the probability that the bus is late and she does not arrive at work by 9 am equals 1/6 *7/10 = 7/60.

Thus, the total probability that Amber does not arrive at work by 9 am is 1/6 + 7/60 = 10/60 + 7/60 = 17/60.

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

Answer: Empirical Exercise 8.2(l) involves running a regression to estimate the relationship between two variables of interest. In evaluating the internal validity of the regression used to answer this exercise, we need to consider several potential sources of bias and other issues that could affect the accuracy of the estimated relationship.

Omitted variable bias: This occurs when a relevant variable is left out of the regression model. If this happens, the estimated coefficients may be biased and inconsistent. For example, if we are estimating the effect of education on earnings but fail to include information about work experience, the coefficient on education may be biased upwards.

Misspecification of the functional form of the regression: If the relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable(s) is nonlinear, we may need to use a different functional form of the regression equation to obtain accurate estimates. If we fail to do so, the estimated coefficients may be biased and inconsistent.

Errors in variables: When measurement errors occur in the independent variable(s), this can cause the estimated coefficients to be biased and inconsistent.

Sample selection: If the sample used to estimate the regression equation is not representative of the population of interest, then the estimated coefficients may be biased and inconsistent.

Simultaneous causality: When there is a two-way causal relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable(s), it may not be possible to determine the direction of causality from the regression coefficients.

Inconsistency of the OLS standard errors: If there is heteroskedasticity or autocorrelation in the data, then the ordinary least squares (OLS) standard errors may be inconsistent. This can lead to incorrect conclusions about the statistical significance of the estimated coefficients.

To address these issues, researchers should take care to select an appropriate sample, use a suitable functional form of the regression equation, and account for any relevant variables that could be omitted or measured with errors. It may also be necessary to use alternative statistical techniques to account for simultaneous causality or heteroskedasticity in the data. Finally, researchers should always test the robustness of their results to different model specifications and sensitivity to potential sources of bias.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Normal model is a good first-choice to model data if the data is normally distributed or approximately normally distributed

Normally distributed or approximately Normally distributed. The Normal distribution, also known as the Gaussian distribution, is a continuous probability distribution that is widely used in statistical modeling due to its mathematical properties and practical applications in many fields.

When the data is Normally distributed, the Normal model provides a good approximation of the underlying distribution of the data. This means that the parameters of the Normal distribution can be estimated from the data using methods such as maximum likelihood estimation, and the resulting model can be used to make predictions and conduct statistical inference.

However, it is important to note that the Normal model may not be appropriate for all types of data, particularly if the data exhibits significant departures from Normality. In such cases, other distributional models or non-parametric methods may be more appropriate.

Learn more about Normal model here

brainly.com/question/23907399

#SPJ4

This is because when hawks are extremely rare, their payoff is higher than that of doves regardless of the value of c. Therefore, there is no point at which their payoffs will be equal.

The mathematical field of game theory helps shed light on how it emerges. Game theory is “the study of mathematical models of strategic interaction among rational decision-makers” (according to Wikipedia).

Game theory applies to “games” as varied as economics, politics, chess, and tic-tac-toe. In each case, there are some rules, some “players” or “agents”, and a set of strategies available to them.

Each player has a concept of “utility” – a “currency” they seek to individually maximize through the strategies they play.

The currency of evolution is the concept of fitness.

That is, the chance of being represented in the next generation. Genes and traits which increase the odds of survival to reproductive age are more likely to be passed on to future generations. Therefore, they confer a greater fitness to the individual which "hosts” them.

The evolutionary game theory takes the concepts from game theory and applies them in an evolutionary context.

In the hawk-dove game, at what value of c do doves and hawks have equal payoffs when hawks are extremely rare? The answer is that there is no such value. This is because when hawks are extremely rare, their payoff is higher than that of doves regardless of the value of c. Therefore, there is no point at which their payoffs will be equal.

learn more about game theory

https://brainly.com/question/30999858

#SPJ11

SA = 2lw + 2lh + 2wh = 42 m^2 ... (1)

And the volume of the original prism is given by:

V = lwh = 18 m^3 ... (2)

If you enlarge the dimensions of the prism by a factor of 4, then the new dimensions will be 4l, 4w, and 4h. The new surface area of the prism will be:

New SA = 2(4l)(4w) + 2(4l)(4h) + 2(4w)(4h)

= 32lw + 32lh + 32wh

= 32(2lw + 2lh + 2wh)

= 32(42)

= 1344 m^2

So, the surface area of the enlarged prism is 1344 m^2.

Similarly, the new volume of the prism will be:

New V = (4l)(4w)(4h)

= 64lwh

= 64(18)

= 1152 m^3

So, the volume of the enlarged prism is 1152 m^3.

Therefore, the surface area of the prism is 1344 m^2 and the volume of the prism is 1152 m^3 after the dimensions are enlarged by a factor of 4.

*IG:whis.sama_ent

The first option with 2-year term and higher monthly payments is better since it results in less total paid in the end.

An individual borrower can receive a personal loan to utilise for personal, family, or household needs. The majority of personal loans are unsecured, which means they are not secured by property like a house or a car. Instead, the approval of a personal loan is determined by the borrower's creditworthiness and capacity to pay back the loan. The lender decides the loan amount, interest rate, and repayment conditions for a personal loan based on the borrower's credit score, income, and employment history, among other things. Personal loans are frequently used to pay for unforeseen bills, finance home improvements, and consolidate debt.

For the given plans of payment of 2 years and 5 years we have:

Option 1: 24 monthly payments of $354.56 = $8,534.56 total paid.

Option 2: 60 monthly payments of $154.66 = $9,279.60 total paid.

Comparing the total payment for the various years we have see that the plan with 2 years payment is better option.

Hence, the first option with 2-year term and higher monthly payments is better since it results in less total paid in the end.

Learn more about personal loan here:

https://brainly.com/question/31292605

#SPJ1

Given that there are no outliers in the data, the mean of 3.2 inches should be used to characterise the centre of the data represented by this line plot.

It is dependent on whether or not the data set contains outliers.

If there are no outliers, the mean should be utilised.

If this is the case, the median should be utilised.

The dot plot shows how many times each measure appears. Because there are no outliers, all values are near, the mean should be utilised. It is provided by:

M = (2 x 1 + 3 x 2 + 2 x 3 + 1 x 5 + 1 x 6 + 1 x 7)/(2 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 1).

The mean of 3.2 inches should be used to define the data centre in this line graphic.

Learn more about median here:

https://brainly.com/question/28060453

#SPJ1

Complete question:

What is the best way to describe the center of the data represented in this line plot?

Select from the drop-down menus to correctly complete the statement.

The Choose...is Mean or median Choose.... 2 inches 2.5 inches 3 inches or 3.2 inches

Answer:

B. Mixed numbers with unlike denominators can be subtracted from each other.

Step-by-step explanation:

Mixed numbers are numbers that have a whole part and a fractional part, such as 2 1/4 or 3 3/5. Unlike denominators are fractions that have different numbers in the bottom, such as 1/4 and 3/5. They are also called unlikeable denominators because they make math harder and more annoying. Who likes to deal with fractions anyway?

Mixed numbers with unlike denominators can be subtracted from each other, but only if you follow some tedious steps. First, you have to find a common denominator for the fractions, which is the smallest number that both denominators can divide into. This is like finding a common enemy for two rival gangs. For example, to subtract 2 1/4 from 3 3/5, we need to find a common denominator for 1/4 and 3/5. The least common denominator is 20, because both 4 and 5 can divide into it. Then, we have to multiply both fractions by the same factor to get equivalent fractions with the same denominator. This is like dressing up both gangs in the same uniform to make them look alike. For example, we multiply 1/4 by 5/5 and 3/5 by 4/4 to get:

2 1/4 = 2 5/20

3 3/5 = 3 12/20

Now we can subtract the fractions by subtracting the numerators and keeping the denominators the same. This is like taking away some members from each gang and seeing who has more left. For example, we subtract 5/20 from 12/20 and get 7/20. Then we subtract 2 from 3 and get 1. Finally, we add the whole part and the fractional part together to get the final answer. This is like adding up the remaining members of one gang and giving them a name. For example, we get:

3 12/20 - 2 5/20 = (3 - 2) + (12/20 - 5/20) = 1 + 7/20 = 1 7/20

Therefore, the correct answer is B. Mixed numbers with unlike denominators can be subtracted from each other. But why would you want to do that? It's much easier to use decimals or percentages instead. Fractions are so last century.

The given statement after evaluating and considering the other options is false. Due to the criteria it falls under elaborates the  case of statistically significant change is to be present while comparing the math scores  between the two groups, In short there will always be difference between two group s while we compare them on a particular topic .

From here on we can come to the conclusion that the difference was not due to chance occurrence.

A statistically significant change  refers to process which is  unlikely to be elaborated solely by chance and random factors.

In short, a statistically significant  has a very less chances  of taking place if there is no true effect in a research study.

The famous examples of statistical significance of finding are

To learn more about statistical significance,

brainly.com/question/15848236

#SPJ4

Answer:

Corina makes $27 for every 2 hours that she works, so she makes $13.50 for every hour she works (since 2 times $13.50 equals $27).

If she worked 36 hours this week, then she made:

$13.50 x 36 = $486

Therefore, Corina made $486 this week.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: $486

Step-by-step explanation:

27/2= 13.5

$13.5 per hour

13.5 x 36 = $486

The probability of having at least one faulty component in your selection is 0.41 or 41%.

The probability of having at least one faulty component in a selection of 5 can be found by calculating the probability of having no faulty components and then subtracting this from 1.

The probability of having no faulty components in a selection of 5 is:

P(no faulty) = (0.9)^5 = 0.59

Therefore, the probability of having at least one faulty component in a selection of 5 is:

P(at least one faulty) = 1 - P(no faulty) = 1 - 0.59 = 0.41

So the probability of having at least one faulty component in your selection is 0.41 or 41%.

To know more about probability, here

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

--The complete Question is, You randomly pick 5 components from the bag of 30. What is the probability that you have at least one faulty component in your selection? --

Hi !

[tex]2x + 3 > 11\\\iff 2x > 8\\\iff x > \frac{8}{2}\\ \iff x > 4[/tex]

Have a nice day ;)

Answer:

x > 4

Isolate the variable by dividing each side by the factors that don't contain the variable

The missing factor in the second equation is 1, and the completed equation is: -24y + (-5) = -4(6y + 5/4)

We know that the GCF of -24y and -20 is 4. To find the missing factor in each equation, we can divide both terms by the GCF of 4.

For the first equation, we have:

-24y = 4 * (-6y)

Dividing both sides by 4, we get:

-6y = -24/4

Simplifying, we get:

-6y = -6

Therefore, the missing factor in the first equation is -1, and the completed equation is:

-24y + 20 = -4(6y - 5)

For the second equation, we have:

-20 = 4 * (-5)

Dividing both sides by 4, we get:

-5 = -20/4

Simplifying, we get:

-5 = -5/1

Therefore, the missing factor in the second equation is 1, and the completed equation is:

-24y + (-5) = -4(6y + 5/4)

Learn more about GCF at https://brainly.com/question/219464

#SPJ1

For the given data correct option is option a.) The range is the best measure of variability, and it equals 8.

The dots on the line plot reflect the quantity of roses purchased every day at a grocery shop based on the supplied data. The dots are scattered horizontally, with some dots above specific numbers.

1, 2, 6, 7, 8, and 9 have dots above them , thus,

for given problem,

[tex]\text{Number of Rose Bouquets: 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9}[/tex]

[tex]\text{The range is the difference between the highest and lowest values:}[/tex]

[tex]Range = \text{Highest value} - \text{ Lowest value}\\Range = 9 - 1\\Range = 8[/tex]

The Interquartile Range (IQR) is a measure of variability that considers the difference between the data set's 25th and 75th percentiles (Q3).

The median (Q2) would be towards these digits since there are dots above numbers 6, 7, and 8. As a result, using the information provided, the IQR cannot be computed precisely.

Learn more about range here:

https://brainly.com/question/28135761

#SPJ1

The slope of the points in this table is equal to 1.2.

In Mathematics and Geometry, the slope of any straight line can be determined by using this mathematical equation;

Slope (m) = (Change in y-axis, Δy)/(Change in x-axis, Δx)

Slope (m) = (y₂ - y₁)/(x₂ - x₁)

Based on the information provided in the table, we can logically deduce the following data points on the line:

Substituting the given points into the slope formula, we have the following;

Slope, m = (3.7 + 1.1)/(1 + 3)

Slope, m = 4.8/4

Slope, m = 1.2.

Read more on slope here: brainly.com/question/3493733

#SPJ1

A company claims that its tablet computers have an average recharge time of 3 hours with a standard deviation of 1.4 hours. Using a random sample of 50 company tablet computers, a consumer group determines a mean recharge time of 2.5 hours. H0: µ = 3 Ha: µ < 3 a = 5% σ = 1.4 z* = –1.65.

Based on the given information, we can perform a one-sample z-test to determine if the sample mean of 2.5 hours is significantly different from the claimed population mean of 3 hours, with a significance level of 0.05.

The null hypothesis H0 is that the population mean recharge time µ is equal to 3 hours, and the alternative hypothesis Ha is that µ is less than 3 hours.

We will find the test statistic z using the formula

z = (x - µ) / (σ / √n)

Where x is the sample mean of 2.5 hours, µ is the population mean of 3 hours, σ is the population standard deviation of 1.4 hours, and n is the sample size of 50.

z = (2.5 - 3) / (1.4 / √50) = -2.38

The calculated test statistic z of -2.38 is less than the critical value z* of -1.65 at a significance level of 0.05, indicating that we can reject the null hypothesis H0.

Hence, we can conclude that the mean recharge time of the company tablet computers is less than 3 hours, based on the sample of 50 tablets tested by the consumer group.

To know more about standard deviation here

https://brainly.com/question/12032692

#SPJ4