What is the difference between point of view and voice?
A. Point of view includes the thoughts and feelings expressed by the
characters, while voice is the dialogue the characters speak to one
another.
B. Point of view means the events of a story as told by the characters
themselves, while voice is information related to an outside
character.
C. Point of view is the lesson an author wants the reader to learn,
while voice is the preexisting knowledge the reader brings to a
story
D. Point of view is the perspective from which a story is told, while
voice is the combination of language, diction, and tone used to tell
a story

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer: B

Explanation: Big brain :)

What are the connotative meanings of sighing, as used in the poem? Check all that apply.

longing
sadness
relaxation
exhaling
peacefulness
breathing

how many people died in Shakespeare's King Henry V?

What life changing event happened to bud? Bud not buddy

Read these lines from “Elegy for Jane”:

My sparrow, you are not here,
Waiting like a fern, making a spiney shadow.
What poetic devices have been used in these lines and to what effect?
A.
Simile and oxymoron: In comparing Jane to a sparrow and a fern, the speaker is emphasizing her contradictions.
B.
Metaphor and imagery: In comparing Jane to a sparrow and a fern, the speaker is evoking an image of what she was like.
C.
Metaphor and simile: In comparing Jane to a sparrow and a fern, the speaker is emphasizing her sweetness and innocence.

write letter to your friend explaining why you cannot go to his/her house.​

PLZ HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
rewrite each of the five sentences correctly and correct the errors to ensure subject-verb agreement.
1.I picked flowers yesterday morning with grandmother.

2.Ginger and Sophia will have played hop scotch every day next week.

3.Bruno run the race quickly.

4.We will have eat dinner at a restaurant every Saturday this month.

5.The cheerleaders had cheer at last night's football game.

Read the passage. excerpt from Federalist No. 78 by Alexander Hamilton In 1787 and 1788, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison wrote the Federalist Papers to persuade voters to ratify the proposed Constitution of the United States of America. These papers included essays about all three branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial. In Federalist No. 78, Hamilton focused specifically on the judicial branch. Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them. The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments. This simple view of the matter suggests several important consequences. It proves incontestably, that the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it can never attack with success either of the other two; and that all possible care is requisite to enable it to defend itself against their attacks. It equally proves, that though individual oppression may now and then proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter; I mean so long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislature and the Executive. For I agree, that "there is no liberty, if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers.'' And it proves, in the last place, that as liberty can have nothing to fear from the judiciary alone, but would have every thing to fear from its union with either of the other departments; that as all the effects of such a union must ensue from a dependence of the former on the latter, notwithstanding a nominal and apparent separation; that as, from the natural feebleness of the judiciary, it is in continual jeopardy of being overpowered, awed, or influenced by its co-ordinate branches; and that as nothing can contribute so much to its firmness and independence as permanency in office, this quality may therefore be justly regarded as an indispensable ingredient in its constitution, and, in a great measure, as the citadel of the public justice and the public security. The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution. By a limited Constitution, I understand one which contains certain specified exceptions to the legislative authority; such, for instance, as that it shall pass no bills of attainder, no ex-post-facto laws, and the like. Limitations of this kind can be preserved in practice no other way than through the medium of courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing. How does Hamilton support and advance his purpose in Paragraph 2 by using the word feebleness in this excerpt? . . . that as, from the natural feebleness of the judiciary, it is in continual jeopardy of being overpowered, awed, or influenced by its co-ordinate branches . . . This word allows Hamilton to stress the idea that the judiciary plays a naturally passive role in the government—reacting to the other branches—so its independence must be guaranteed. The word lets Hamilton suggest that the efforts of the judiciary are mostly ineffective, so it should not be linked to any other branches lest it negatively influence them. The word conveys Hamilton's belief that the judiciary's function will be irrelevant unless it is allowed to exist under the strong and guiding power of the other branches of government. The word captures Hamilton's view that the judiciary is of questionable value, so it ought to be granted complete independence so it can prove its worth to the government.

What does the seventh man see inside the wave?

2 Alaina has included an exaggeration in sentence 7. Which of the following could best replace the phrase who have all devoted their life to and create a more effective sentence?​

Which word best completes the sentence?

Select the word from the drop-down menu.

The rider
Choose...
clenched
loathed
peaked
spurred

her horse to make it go faster.

Which sentence best describes what "State of Mind" is mainly about?


A

The company responsible for inventing the Guided Decision Chip is known as TruVoice.


B

Norman Hall, a long-time resident, is living a lie because he really does think the chip is a good idea.


C

A chip is implanted in the brains of citizens, making them think alike and lose their own opinions.


D

It's the free exchange of ideas and lively debate that make us who we are.

What does Mead's "brightly lit" house tell us about his character?

Read the sentence.
When Milo had chicken pox, his brother had to
move out of their room because the virus is
contagious.
Which statement best describes what a student can
learn by analyzing the relationship between the two
underlined words?
O A virus is a type of chicken pox.
O Chicken pox is a type of virus.
O A virusis highly contagious.
O Chicken pox is highly contagious.

Which one is a run on sentence

GE
1. Right now Jason was playing right
nt field. He really wanted to play
third base. Earlier this year, coach had put hem in left field and
decond base en game, but never at third base. Once in practice
each coach let him play thard base, but he kept missing ground
balls. When he did stop Jone , he made a bad throw to first
base - magbe be if he kept practicing , Jason would be good
play
enough to
third base. That was his dream.
The Summary of passage is
​

Perrault was a French-Canadian, and swarthy; but Francois was a French-Canadian half-breed, and twice as swarthy. They were a new kind of men to Buck (of which he was destined to see many more), and while he developed no affection for them, he none the less grew honestly to respect them. He speedily learned that Perrault and Francois were fair men, calm and impartial in administering justice, and too wise in the way of dogs to be fooled by dogs.

—The Call of the Wild,
Jack London

What does this passage show about Buck’s new owners?

They are kind men and treat the dogs well.
They are respected for their fairness.
They are fast learners, like their dogs.
They are different from all other men.

True or false???????????help

guess who's losing their rights if trump gets re-elected!!!!
me and thousands of people in america.

who is the most important character in the merchant of venice

My bed is sending out serious nap rays.
is this personification?

PLEASE HELP AND EXPLAIN WHY THIS IS MANDATORY!!!!!
If you want to decide if a research study will include information that is useful to you, what sections should you skim first?

a. the introduction and the variables
b. the abstract and the conclusion
c. the variables and the methodology
d. the methodology and the results

Help I never get English correct

Use scansion to identify the meter in Frost’s “Nothing Gold Can Stay.”

Read the excerpt from Animal Farm. The whole farm was deeply divided on the subject of the windmill. Snowball did not deny that to build it would be a difficult business. Stone would have to be carried and built up into walls, then the sails would have to be made and after that there would be need for dynamos and cables. (How these were to be procured, Snowball did not say.) But he maintained that it could all be done in a year. And thereafter, he declared, so much labour would be saved that the animals would only need to work three days a week. Napoleon, on the other hand, argued that the great need of the moment was to increase food production, and that if they wasted time on the windmill they would all starve to death. The animals formed themselves into two factions under the slogan, "Vote for Snowball and the three-day week” and "Vote for Napoleon and the full manger." Why does Snowball want to build a windmill? He wants to compel the animals to work harder. He wants to increase food production immediately. He wants to find a use for the stone on the farm. He wants to make the farm run more efficiently. Mark this and return

Differences between deuki and jhumma partha​

Fast plz help

How can Juana best revise the text to help draw in new
clients?
O by stating her main idea at the beginning of the
paragraph
O by making unsupported claims about her competitors
O by offering a special discount to first-time customers
O by choosing information that is more appropriate to
the topic

what is the meaning of ''regiment''

I will give a brainliest to anyone who answers correctly. Thank you

Read the sentence.

The English novelist Virginia Woolf, who pioneered the use of stream of consciousness in fiction, was a prolific writer, and the influence of her fiction and nonfiction on her contemporaries was both powerful and pervasive.

Which statements best describe this sentence? Select three options.

It is a complex sentence.
It contains a restrictive clause.
It is a compound-complex sentence.
It contains a nonrestrictive clause.
It links three clauses to add variety to a text.

The ethics of photojournalism are the same as other areas of journalism.
True
False