The example of the results of the Supreme Court decision that was quickly overturned by a Constitutional Amendment was “separate but equal” facilities. Thus, option first is correct.
What is the best way to override a Supreme Court decision?When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional question, its decision is nearly irrevocable; only the seldom used method of constitutional amendment or a fresh ruling by the Court can change it.
In the 1954 case of Brown v. Board of Education, for example, the Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. It overturned the previous judgement in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which had established the concept of "separate but equal" facilities.
"Separate but equal" facilities were an example of the outcomes of a Supreme Court ruling that was shortly repealed by a Constitutional Amendment. As a result, option first is correct.
Learn more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ1
Forensic toxicologist John Trestrail used DNA to work on the Crippen case decades later. What did this new technology help determine?
A. Dr. Crippen and Cora never had children.
B. The body in the basement wasn’t Cora’s.
C. Cora wrote the letter to Dr. Crippen.
D. A relative of Cora’s killed her in the United States.
It wasn't Cora's body that was in the basement. The correct response is option (B).
What is the Crippen case?The murder trial of Dr. Hawley Harvey Crippen took place in 1910, after which he poisoned his wife (who went by the stage name Belle Elmore), dismembered and buried her bones in the coal cellar, and fled London with his mistress-secretary, Miss Ethel Le Neve. They were able to obtain a histology slide from the coal cellar that belonged to Dr. Spilsbury, separate the DNA, and conduct DNA testing on it. Three of Cora's maternal relatives had their mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is exclusively passed down through the maternal line, examined by researchers. John Ellis and William Willis executed 48-year-old Crippen by hanging in Pentonville on November 23, 1910.
To know more about Crippen case, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28668333
#SPJ1
Can you operate a motor scooter on the street without a driver's license or instruction permit?
The specific laws governing the operation of motor scooters on the street vary by state. In general, however, it is typically required to have a valid driver's license or instruction permit in order to operate a motor scooter on the street.
In some states, a separate endorsement or classification may be required to operate a motor scooter on the street. For example, in California, a person must have a valid driver's license or instruction permit and either a "M1" endorsement or a "M2" endorsement in order to operate a motor scooter on the street. An M1 endorsement allows a person to operate a motor scooter with a motor of 150cc or less, while an M2 endorsement allows a person to operate any motor scooter.
In other states, a motor scooter may be classified as a "moped" and may have different requirements for operation. For example, in Virginia, a person must have a valid driver's license or instruction permit and a "M" endorsement in order to operate a moped on the street. A moped is defined as a motor vehicle with pedals and a motor of 50cc or less.
It is important to check the specific laws and requirements in your state to determine what is needed to legally operate a motor scooter on the street.
I need conclusions please and thank you
I will really appreciate it
Answer:
if nothing changes about this law distracted driving will continue to kill people. its up to us as people to do the right thing and make the right choices. things start to matter when action starts to happen onto whats right and wrong.
Explanation:
its need one more sentance i feel but i feel like the answer itself is soobvious i mean the conclusion should always be abt the whole point of whatever ur writing in the first place, so im kinda confused on how it was hard for u to make one when its litterly abt the concept of the whole essay -_-
Which section BEST refers to the right of the accused juvenile to "remain silent""
A Probable Cause HearingProbable Cause Hearing
B " 'Miranda Rights' "" 'Miranda Rights' "
C Dispensational HearingDispensational Hearing
D Must Be Notified of Charges
Miranda Rights refer to the right of the accused juvenile to remain silent. The correct option is b.
What is Miranda warning?The Miranda warning refers to a type of notification customarily given by police to criminal suspects in police custody or a custodial interrogation advising them of their right to silence and, in effect, protection from self-incrimination and that is, their right to refuse to answer questions or provide information to law enforcement or other officials. These rights are often referred to as Miranda rights.
The idea came from law professor Yale Kamisar, who subsequently was dubbed the father of Miranda.
Learn more about Miranda, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12363831
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP!
An individual must file his or her intellectual property application in person.
True
False
An individual must file his or her intellectual property application in person. This statement is true.
What is intellectual property ?Intangible works of human intellect are included in the category of property known as intellectual property. Different nations recognize different kinds of intellectual property to varying degrees. The most well-known types include trade secrets, patents, copyrights, and trademarks.
Intellectual property rights give creators legal protection for their original works, inventions, or the aesthetics of their products, as well as for their artistic creations, scientific discoveries, and other innovations. In essence, intellectual property rights are a typical kind of legal IP protection for inventors.
Thus,An individual must file his or her intellectual property application in person. This statement is true.
To learn more about intellectual property, follow the link;
https://brainly.com/question/17348419
#SPJ1
Describe the piecemeal incorporation of the
Bill of Rights. What issue is at stake with the
incorporation? What is the role of the
Fourteenth Amendment in incorporation?
Answer:
The piecemeal incorporation of the Bill of Rights refers to the process by which the protections and rights outlined in the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution have been applied to the states. This process has occurred gradually over time, with individual amendments being incorporated into state law on a case-by-case basis. The issue at stake with the incorporation of the Bill of Rights is the extent to which the states are bound by the protections and rights outlined in the U.S. Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment plays a significant role in the incorporation of the Bill of Rights, as it includes the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, which have been used by the courts to apply many of the rights outlined in the Bill of Rights to the states.
Gordon and Brenda entered into a romantic relationship in June. They exchanged keys to one another’s apartments. Their relationship continued until December 31. Brenda’s feelings started to cool in October, and she told Gordon she wanted to be only friends. However, Gordon persisted in his advances. He gave Brenda presents, including a watch and the offer of a plane ticket to New Orleans.
Later, Gordon offered to renovate Brenda’s bathroom. She indicated that she would like this but could not afford to pay him for the work. In February, the renovations were completed. Afterward, Gordon claimed that Brenda had agreed to pay him what she could each month until the bill was paid, although he was not sure what that amount was. Brenda indicated to Gordon that their friendship was over and that he was to return the key.
After discovering that Brenda was seeing a friend of his, Gordon placed a claim on Brenda’s property for $759. The court was not certain as to what had been agreed between the parties, but the judge believed that Gordon had done the work in a bid for Brenda’s continued affection.
Was there a legally binding contract between the parties? Did Brenda have an obligation to pay Gordon for the renovations? Explain your answer with reference to the elements of a contract.
Answer: No there was not a legally binding contract between the parties and Brenda does not have an obligation to pay Gordon for the renovations.
Explanation:
Brenda didn't sign any contract that agreed to her paying him money and she technically never agreed to Gordon renovating or paying Gordon. All she said was that she'd love it but can't afford to pay for it.
An internet provider has been the only one available in the county for many years. A small startup has recently opened,
offering customers internet at a much lower rate. The original internet provider buys the building that is being rented by
the startup and raises their rent to an unfair amount. This makes it impossible for the startup to stay in business. If
brought to the attention of authorities, what kind of crime would the company MOST likely be accused of?
false advertising
O
restraint of trade
price fixing
fraud
If brought to the attention of authorities, restraint of trade is the kind of crime that the company would most likely be accused of
Define restraint of tradeAn employer's risk of a legal conflict with one of its former employees is significantly reduced by a correctly drafted restraint of trade clause. The employee is made aware that until a specific amount of time has passed, they cannot work for a company that is a direct competitor of their former employer.
The enforceability of contractual limitations on the right to conduct business is governed by the common law notion known as restraints of commerce. It is the forerunner of contemporary competition law. An agreement not to trade is void and unenforceable against the promisor because it runs counter to the public policy of promoting trade, unless the restraint of trade is necessary to safeguard the interests of the business buyer.
To learn more about crime, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29308572
#SPJ1
Questions in image. Please help.
Formal Constitutional Powers/Roles:
The President has the formal Constitutional power to nominate and appoint Supreme Court justices with the Advice and Consent of the Senate as outlined in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. This is known as the Appointments Clause.
Informal Powers/Roles:
The President also has the informal power to select a nominee for the Supreme Court, as he is the head of the executive branch and is responsible for nominating and appointing Supreme Court justices. He also has the informal power to consult with Senators in both parties, study the histories and case records of potential candidates, consult with legal experts, and meet with candidates. This ensures that the President is selecting a qualified individual who can best serve the nation.
Checks on Presidential Action:
The main check on presidential action is the Advice and Consent of the Senate. The Senate must approve the President's nomination for the Supreme Court Justice before it can be appointed. In addition, the President may face other checks, such as public scrutiny and media coverage of the nomination process. This could lead to increased public pressure on the President to select a nominee that meets the public's expectations. Furthermore, the Supreme Court may also place checks on presidential action by ruling on the constitutionality of certain executive decisions.
Specified Constitutional Authority/Roles: According to Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution
What is Constitution?A constitution outlines the structure of the entire government and the distribution of power among the various political units. It lays down guidelines for how power should be exercised during national government, including who should exercise it and over whom.
A constitution also establishes the rights and responsibilities of citizens as well as the mechanisms that check those in power as a sort of agreement or contract between those in power and those who are subject to that power.
The President has the constitutional authority to nominate and select Supreme Court justices with the advice and consent of the Senate. Constitution. The Appointments Clause is the name given to this.
Therefore, According to the U.S. Constitution's Article II, Section 2, Clause 2,
Learn more about the Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ2
When changes to the Constitution are needed; these are what are added after
a 2/3 majority vote in congress and
ratification by 3/4 of the states.
O Clauses
O Amendments
O Articles
O Laws
*
When changes to the Constitution are needed; these are referred to as Amendment, which are added after a 2/3 majority vote in congress and ratification by 3/4 of the states. Thus, option 2nd is correct.
What is Constitution?A constitution is the collection of fundamental ideas or established precedents that serve as the legal foundation of a polity, organization, or other form of body and typically dictate how that institution is to be governed.
According to the Constitution, an amendment may be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.
The constitutional convention has not recommended any of the 27 changes to the Constitution. A joint resolution is proposed by Congress as an amendment.
When modifications to the Constitution are required, they are referred to as Amendments, and they are added after a two-thirds majority vote in Congress. Hence, option 2nd is correct.
Learn more about Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
Trying to win an argument over my dad making me clean my room, helpppp.
If you commit a crime and it becomes illegal after u commit it, ex post facto, then can you continue to do that crime since u were already doing it?
Answer:
no you cant because it is illegal now. if somethings illegal after you already commited that crime.. you can't do it again otherwise you'll face the consequences like time in jail or something like that
Explanation:
Answer:
Hello, this is a great question to ask!
First lets look into what is considered a crime. Crimes are acts done by individuals that are illegal at that time and date.
A great example of this is was the Prohibition Era, before this Era the selling of alcohol was Legal, but after the act was passed it became Illegal to sell and manufacture alcohol. This is why many began bootlegging alcohol.
So no, you cannot continue to do a crime after it has become illegal.
what the party's policy is on a single issue
Answer:one essential policy area
Explanation:
Single-issue politics involves political campaigning or political support based on one essential policy area or idea
wikipedia
HELP PLEASE, IVE BEEN DOING THIS SINCE YESTERDAY
Which factor is not considered in determining if a product is dangerous or not?
Responses
whether it poses an injury to or injures a consumer
whether it violates public policy
whether it is unethical and unscrupulous
whether it is too expensive to correct the danger
Answer:
Whether it is too expensive to correct the danger
Explanation:
Whether a product is too expensive to correct the danger is not typically considered in determining if a product is dangerous or not. Instead, the safety of a product is usually evaluated based on whether it poses an injury to or injures a consumer, whether it violates public policy, and whether it is unethical and unscrupulous.
If a product is found to be dangerous, it may be subject to recall or other regulatory action. The cost of correcting the danger is generally not a factor in determining whether or not to take such action. Instead, the focus is on protecting the public from potentially harmful products and ensuring that products are safe for their intended use.
Amazon is a company that is praised for its innovation and success but also harshly criticized for the poor working conditions and exploitative labor practices. This is very typical of the way that capitalism feeds poverty. What is the MOST effective way to address this?
Ask Amazon to reconsider some of their policies.
Support pro-labor policies that demand better working conditions and wages.
Demand media reporting on the issues so that consumers are aware of these practices.
Recognize that there will always be unpleasant jobs, but someone has to do them.
NEED HELP NOW!!
Answer:
B. Support pro-labor policies that demand better working conditions and wages.
Explanation:
Supporting pro-labor policies that demand better working conditions and wages is likely the most effective way to address the issue of poor working conditions and exploitative labor practices in companies like Amazon. Such policies may include minimum wage laws, health and safety regulations, and other protections for workers. By supporting these policies, individuals and groups can advocate for better treatment of workers and ensure that they are able to earn a living wage and work in safe and fair conditions.
Carlos is a forensic entomologist who is asked to help with a high-profile murder. How is Carlos MOST likely going to contribute to the investigation?
A. by determining the time of death
B. by hypothesizing the cause of death
C. by finding the motive of the murderer
D. by collecting the fingerprints from the scene
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
I think it’s a because the other ones do not really make sense for the answer as well as what the question is asking.
____ in prison makes it more likely for people who are incarcerated to secure full-time employment after reentry?
Work-release jobs in prison makes it more likely for people who are incarcerated to secure full-time employment after reentry.
What are work release jobs ?A county jail inmate may participate in the work release program, which enables them to take a full- or part-time job in the community and then return to the correctional facility thereafter.
Such programs enable a prisoner who can be properly trusted or monitored to leave the facility and work outside of it, returning to the facility after their shift is over.
As a result, when people come out from being incarcerated, the experience increases their chances of securing full - time employment.
Find out more on work - release programs at https://brainly.com/question/2385768
#SPJ1
A skirmish breaks out over a disputed area between the border of two nations. Each country claims ownership of the area, although there are people living there who hail from both sides. The skirmish escalates until both countries are sending tanks and airplanes to secure what they believe is their property. One commander manages to capture a local police precinct, executing the head of police and his deputies. Later, when called to account for the deaths of these civilians, which specific charge would the commander MOST likely be charged with?
A. crimes against humanity
B. war crimes
C. genocide
D. terrorism
Answer: B. or war crimes
Explanation:
Around the world, all the laws governing behavior
on the Internet are?
the same.
well enforced.
confusing.
hard to enforce.
Answer:
hard to enforce
Explanation:
Hope it helps!
My topic is Distracted Driving it is Research Essay, I am done the research but I need someone to write the essay. The teacher needs it in a couple of days. Can someone please help me? I will share the doc (give me your email)
2 sources about what the law is?
3 sources about why the law should be changed?
3 sources about how the law should be changed?
Sorry bud, I don’t think that anyone will quite literally write an essay for you, unless you pay them :/
When working in the computer lab during Science class, each student is tasked with creating a slide presentation on Molecules. Jennifer finishes early and decides to watch music videos. She is being quiet and not disturbing others in the class. Sam is also in the Science class and as to include in this power point, is searching for a video to show the number and type of particles in a helium atom. Why would Sam's video streaming be more acceptable while Jennifer's video streaming might sometimes be considered inappropriate?
Answer: B. Sam is searching videos to use in a class project, while Jenifer's video watching can cause a network slowdown throughout the school & was not related to the learning task.
Explanation:
In the case Liebeck v. McDonald's, while Liebeck won the initial case and McDonald's reduced the amount she was rewarded on appeal, ultimately
the final amount she was paid was agree on outside of court. What is this an example of?
settlement
deposition
summons
summary judgment
This is an example of deposition. Thus, option second is correct.
What is deposition?A deposition is a pre-trial opportunity for parties in a civil action to collect testimony from a witness under oath. It is part of the discovery process, in which parties acquire facts and information so that they can present their claims and defenses more effectively at trial.
The jury determined that McDonald's was 80 percent to blame for the event. They awarded Liebeck a net $160,000 in compensatory damages to pay medical bills, as well as $2.7 million in punitive damages (equivalent to $5,000,000 in 2021), the equivalent of two days of McDonald's coffee sales. This is an illustration of deposition. As a result, option two is correct.
Learn more about deposition here:
https://brainly.com/question/4753537
#SPJ1
Benjamin is a state highway patrol officer. What might be one task that performs as part of his job?
A. typing everything said on record in a court proceeding
B. gathering evidence at a crime scene
C. locking the doors to the local rec center at night
D. pulling over a speeding car
Answer:
D. pulling over a speeding car
Explanation:
Looking at these options, the one task I see the most the pulling over a speeding car. Because a highway patrol officer mostly does is checking the speed of the car, so D is the best answer!
Benjamin is a state highway patrol officer, whose one task is to perform pulling over a speeding car. Hence, option D is appropriate.
What is the meaning of the Patrol?
A patrol is typically a team of employees, such as police officers, soldiers, or security people, who are tasked with keeping an eye on or securing a certain area.
The goal of patrol today remains the same as it has always been: the protection of property as well as lives, the detection and prevention of crime, and the performance of other services. This is true despite the enormous changes in technology, society, work, political scenes, and economies, but also workforces themselves.
Hence, option D is correct.
Learn more about the Patrol here:
https://brainly.com/question/28872520
#SPJ1
What do you think would be the most challenging aspect of collecting and analyzing hair samples? Why?
Answer: i think the hardest point of this is making sure your sample is good becuse it needs to have dna in able to be analyed correctly
Explanation: