What are the measures of ∠1 and ∠2?

According to this research, options B and D appear to be the most slope plausible explanations for the data. However, without the real data, determining which equation is the best model is impossible.

The slope of a line indicates how steep it is. The gradient's mathematical equation is known as "gradient overflow" (the change in y divided by the change in x). The slope is defined as the ratio of the vertical change (rise) between two places to the horizontal change (run). The slope-intercept form of an equation is used to express a straight line's equation, which is written as y = mx + b. The y-intercept is found where the slope of the line is m, b is b, and (0, b). For example, consider the slope and y-intercept of the equation y = 3x - 7.The slope of the line is m. b is b at the y-intercept, and (0, b).  

It is impossible to establish which equation is the best model of the data without the actual data. However, we may analyse each possibility based only on the facts provided:

A. y= 2.2 - (1.1%): This equation appears to contain a constant term and a negative slope, making it unsuitable for predicting plant height over time.

B. y= 0.5x + 1.8: The positive slope of this equation indicates that the plant's height rises with time. The constant term of 1.8 might represent the plant's beginning height, while the coefficient of 0.5 could reflect the plant's growth rate.

C. y= 2.0 • (1.4%): This equation appears to contain a constant term and a positive slope, but the percentage term is not obvious how it links to the data.

D. y = 0.7 x + 2.1: This equation, like option B, has a positive slope and a constant term. The coefficient of 0.7 might reflect the plant's growth rate, while the constant term of 2.1 could represent the plant's original height.

According to this research, options B and D appear to be the most plausible explanations for the data. However, without the real data, determining which equation is the best model is impossible.

To know more about slope visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3605446

#SPJ1

The equation models the cost of making different numbers of shirts, where y is the cost in dollars and x is the number of shirts produced is y = 7.5x - 750

To create an equation that models the cost of making different numbers of shirts, we need to determine the relationship between the number of shirts produced and the cost. One way to do this is to use the two-point form of the equation of a line, which is:

y - y₁ = (y₂ - y₁)/(x₂ - x₁) * (x - x₁)

where (x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂) are two points on the line.

Using the points (100, 600) and (250, 1387.50), we can find the slope of the line:

slope = (y₂ - y₁)/(x₂ - x₁) = (1387.50 - 600)/(250 - 100) = 7.5

Then, we can use the point-slope form of the equation of a line to write the equation:

y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)

where m is the slope and (x1, y1) is a point on the line. Using the point (100, 600), we get:

y - 600 = 7.5(x - 100)

Simplifying, we get:

y = 7.5x - 750

This equation models the cost of making different numbers of shirts, where y is the cost in dollars and x is the number of shirts produced.

To learn more about equation click on,

https://brainly.com/question/31543754

#SPJ4

Answer: Assuming that the proportion of patients cured by the drug is p = 0.6 and the sample size is n = 100, we can find the mean and standard error of the sampling distribution as follows:

Mean = p = 0.6

Standard error = sqrt[(p*(1-p))/n] = sqrt[(0.6*(1-0.6))/100] = 0.049

Rounding to three decimal places, the standard error is 0.049.

Step-by-step explanation:

The unit digit of 725 unit digit of (325)​ is given as 5

Unveiling the unit digit of a number raised to an exact power can be done by analyzing the pattern of the unit digits of said power sequence.

For instance, given the task of ascertaining the unit digit of 325^725, let us observe the recurrent pattern concerning 5's power line:

[tex]5^1 = 5\\5^2 = 25\\5^3 = 125\\5^4 = 625\\5^5 = 3125[/tex]

It is readily evident that the final digit of 5 raised to any affirmative integer power shall invariably remain as 5. Correlatively, the end figure for 325^725 is also 5.

Read more on unit digits here:https://brainly.com/question/29549657

#SPJ1

Answer:

(0, [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] ) , (1, [tex]\frac{5}{4}[/tex] ) , (2, 2 )

Step-by-step explanation:

to determine which points are contained in the graph.

substitute the x- coordinate of each point into the equation and if the value obtained is equal to the y- coordinate of the point then it is contained in the graph.

(0, [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] )

y = [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] (0) + [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = 0 + [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = y- coordinate ← contained in graph

(1, [tex]\frac{5}{4}[/tex] )

y = [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] ( 1) + [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{2}{4}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{5}{4}[/tex] = y- coordinate ← contained in graph

([tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex], 0 )

y = [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] ([tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] ) + [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3}{8}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{4}{8}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{7}{8}[/tex] ≠ y- coordinate ← not contained in graph

(2, 2 )

y = [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] (2) + [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{4}{2}[/tex] = 2 = y- coordinate ← contained in graph

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4,456,546

Answer:

FH = 26

Step-by-step explanatio

I only know the answer

Answer:

FH ≈ 11.62

Step-by-step explanation:

using the Altitude- on- Hypotenuse theorem , then

FH² = EH × GH = 9 × 15 = 135 ( take square root of both sides )

FH = [tex]\sqrt{135}[/tex] ≈ 11.62 ( to the nearest hundredth )

The order of the given fractions after arranging from least to greatest is 1/5, 2/5, 4/5.

To put the fractions 1/5, 2/5, and 4/5 in order from least to greatest, we can either convert them to decimals or find a common denominator and compare the numerators. Here, we will use the latter method.

First, we need to find a common denominator. The smallest denominator that all three fractions share is 5. So, we can rewrite the fractions as follows:

1/5 = 1/5

2/5 = 2/5

4/5 = 4/5

Now, we can compare the numerators since the denominators are the same. Clearly, 1/5 is the smallest, followed by 2/5, and then 4/5 is the largest.

To learn more about fractions click on,

https://brainly.com/question/18530611

#SPJ4

Answer:

the correct answer is option D

(a) To solve this problem, we need to apply the concept of combinations.  We can find the total number of combinations by using the formula:

nCr = n! / r!(n-r)!

where n is the total number of objects, r is the number of objects we want to select.

Let's assume that we have x pennies, y nickels, z dimes, and w quarters. Since we want to select 25 coins, we can write the equation as x + y + z + w = 25

To find the number of ways to select 25 coins, we need to find the number of solutions to this equation. The total number of combinations is given by: (25 + 4 - 1)C(4 - 1) = 28C3

where we have 25 coins to select and four piles to choose from. Thus, the answer is 28C3.

(b) To solve this problem, we need to use the concept of counting with restrictions. Since we must select at least 5 quarters, we can assume that we have selected 5 quarters and we need to select the remaining 20 coins from the remaining piles. Let's assume that we have x pennies, y nickels, and z dimes. We can write it as x + y + z = 20

To find the number of ways to select 20 coins from the remaining piles, we can use the concept of combinations. The total number of combinations is (20 + 3 - 1)C(3 - 1) = 22C2

Thus, the total number of ways to select 25 coins with at least 5 quarters is given as 10C5 x 22C2

where we have selected 5 quarters from 10 quarters and 20 coins from the remaining piles.

(c)To solve this problem, we need to use the concept of counting with restrictions. Since we can select at most 10 quarters, we need to consider two cases:

(i) We select 10 quarters, and we need to select 15 coins from the remaining piles.

For case (i), we need to select 15 coins from the remaining piles. We can assume that we have x pennies, y nickels, and z dimes. We can write the equation as x + y + z = 15

The total number of ways to select 15 coins is (15 + 3 - 1)C(3 - 1) = 17C2

(ii) We select fewer than 10 quarters, and we need to select the remaining coins from the piles.

For case (ii), To calculate the number of ways, we can use the combination formula to select i quarters out of 10, where i can vary from 0 to 9, and select the remaining (25-i) coins from the remaining piles. We can then sum up the number of ways for all possible values of i to get the total number of ways to select 25 coins with at most 10 quarters.

To know more about Permutation and Combinations here

https://brainly.com/question/13387529

#SPJ4

The bearing of A from B is 253 degrees

The bearing of B from A is 073 degrees

Bearings are typically measured in a counterclockwise direction from north.

The reference direction for bearings is north, and then the angle is measured in a counterclockwise direction relative to north.

Using this method, we have that

The bearing of A from B is 253 degrees

The bearing of B from A is 073 degrees

Learn more about bearing at

https://brainly.com/question/28782815

#SPJ1

Answer:

the transformations that take the graph of those two equations are a reflection about the x-axis followed by a vertical shift downward by 2 units.

Step-by-step explanation:

Reflection: this reflects the original graph f(x)=e^x below the x-axis, resulting in the graph of -e^x.

Vertical shift: this will shift the graph -e^x downwards by 2 units.

Therefore, the transformations are a reflection about the x-axis followed by a vertical shift downward by 2 units.

As a result, they would pay: 5/6 x $36 = $30 as Kendie's family would shell out 1/6 less than the standard admission price.

In mathematics, the linear approach is a way when resolving issues with direct or negative proportion. It entails figuring out the value of one unit of a quantity and utilising that value to figure out the value of any given quantity divided by that number of units. For instance, using the unitary technique, if we know that 5 oranges cost $10, we may calculate the price of 10 apples by first dividing $5 by 5 to get $2 per apple, multiplying $two by 10 to get $20 for 10 apples, and then using the result to get the price of 5 apples. In industries where proportional correlations are regularly found, like banking, business, and science, the unitary technique is frequently employed.

given

On Sunday, Kendie's family would shell out 1/6 less than the standard admission price, or 5/6 of the standard admission price.

As a result, they would pay: 5/6 x $36 = $30 as Kendie's family would shell out 1/6 less than the standard admission price.

To know more about unitary method visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ1

a. The probability of exactly two flaws in a 50-yard piece of material is approximately 0.2707.

b. The probability of no more than two flaws in a 50-yard piece of material is approximately 0.6767.

c. The probability of no flaws in a 25-yard piece of material is approximately 0.3679.

To find the probability of exactly two flaws in a 50-yard piece of material, we can use the Poisson distribution. Let λ be the average number of flaws per 50 yards of material, which is 2. Then, the probability of exactly k flaws occurring in a 50-yard piece of material is given by

P(k flaws) = (e^(-λ) × λ^k) / k!

So, for k=2, we have

P(2 flaws) = (e^(-2) × 2^2) / 2! ≈ 0.2707

Therefore, the probability of exactly two flaws in a 50-yard piece of material is approximately 0.2707.

b. To find the probability of no more than two flaws in a 50-yard piece of material, we need to sum the probabilities of having 0, 1, or 2 flaws. So, we have

P(no more than 2 flaws) = P(0 flaws) + P(1 flaw) + P(2 flaws)

We already know P(2 flaws) from part (a). To find P(1 flaw), we can use the same formula as before with λ=2 and k=1

P(1 flaw) = (e^(-2) × 2^1) / 1! ≈ 0.2707

To find P(0 flaws), we use the same formula with λ=2 and k=0

P(0 flaws) = (e^(-2) × 2^0) / 0! ≈ 0.1353

Therefore, we have:

P(no more than 2 flaws) = 0.2707 + 0.2707 + 0.1353 ≈ 0.6767

So, the probability of no more than two flaws in a 50-yard piece of material is approximately 0.6767.

c. To find the probability of no flaws in a 25-yard piece of material, we can again use the Poisson distribution, but with a different value of λ. Since the average number of flaws per 50 yards is 2, the average number of flaws per 25 yards is 1. So, we have:

P(0 flaws) = (e^(-1) × 1^0) / 0! ≈ 0.3679

Learn more about probability here

brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

The statement that is not true of unnormalized data is option (d) unnormalized data is multivalued data.

Unnormalized data refers to raw data that has not been organized or processed in any way. It may contain redundancies, inconsistencies, and other issues that make it difficult to work with. However, it does not necessarily involve multivalued data.

Multivalued data refers to data that has multiple values for a single attribute. For example, if a customer can have multiple phone numbers, that data would be considered multivalued. Unnormalized data may or may not have multivalued data, depending on the nature of the data itself.

Therefore, the correct option is (d) unnormalized data is multivalued data

Learn more about raw data here

brainly.com/question/30557329

#SPJ4

Answer:

3/10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

b. sin X and c. cos Y

Step-by-step explanation:

sin = opposite/hypotenuse

cos = adjacent/hypotenuse

sin Y = 32/40 incorrect

sin X = 24/40 correct

cos Y = 24/40 correct

cos X =32/40 incorrect

So the answers are sin  X and cos Y

The Junior class sold 165 slices of pizza.

Let x represent the number of hamburgers sold and y represent the number of slices of pizza sold.

The total amount from sales: 1.35x + 0.75y = 292.50

They sold 40 more slices of pizza than hamburgers: y = x + 40

Now, we'll solve the system of equations using the substitution method:

Substitute the second equation into the first equation:
1.35x + 0.75(x + 40) = 292.50

Distribute $0.75 through the parentheses:
1.35x + 0.75x + 30 = 292.50

Combine like terms:
2.10x + 30 = 292.50

Subtract 30 from both sides of the equation:
2.10x = 262.50

Divide both sides by 2.10 to solve for x:
x = 125

Now that we know there were 125 hamburgers sold, we can use the second equation to find the number of slices of pizza sold:

y = x + 40
y = 125 + 40
y = 165
for such more question on total amount

https://brainly.com/question/25109150

#SPJ11

If the total trip takes 12 hours, the speed of the current is 1 mph.

The speed of an object is described as  the magnitude of the change of its position over time or the magnitude of the change of its position per unit of time.

The downstream trip:

distance = rate × time

96 = (18 + x) × t ( 18 + x)

The upstream trip:

distance = rate × time

96 = (18 - x) × (12 - t)

96 = (18 - x) × (12 - t)

8 = x - (x/6)t

We have two equations and two unknowns, so we can solve for x and t.

We solve for x by making t subject fomula and substituting into the equation.

Where x = 1

In conclusion, if the total trip takes 12 hours, the speed of the current is 1 mph.

Learn more about speed at: https://brainly.com/question/4931057

#SPJ1

The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT). RCTs are considered the gold standard for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions.

In this study, the researcher will randomly assign subjects to either an exercise or non-exercise group, which helps to ensure that any observed differences in mental health outcomes can be attributed to the exercise intervention and not other factors. Stratified random sampling is also being used to ensure that the study includes representative proportions of different age groups. By conducting a mental health exam at the beginning and end of the study, the researcher can compare changes in mental health outcomes between the two groups. Overall, this RCT has a strong design that will enable the researcher to draw meaningful conclusions about the effects of exercise on mental health.

Visit here to learn more about  factors :  https://brainly.com/question/14801938
#SPJ11

The measure of the missing angle in the cyclic quadrilateral is 104°

From the question, we are to determine the measure of the inscribed angle in the given diagram

In the given diagram, we have a cyclic quadrilateral.

From one of the circle theorems, we known that

The sum of the opposite angles of cyclic quadrilateral are supplementary. That is they sum up to 180 degrees.

Let the unknown angle measure be x,

Then,

We can write that

x + 76°  = 180°

x = 180° - 76°

x = 104°

Hence, the missing angle measure is 104°

Learn more on Circle Geometry here: https://brainly.com/question/31400801

#SPJ1

Answer:

15 feet and 9 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

9 feet and 5 inches + 6 feet and 4 inches = 15 feet and 9 inches

Answer:

4(6) + 4(5) + 4(4) = 24 + 20 + 16 = 60 ft^2

The popcorn box can hold 35 cubic inches of popcorn when it is full.

To find the volume of the popcorn box modeled as a right rectangular prism with dimensions 2 inches by 2.5 inches by 7 inches, you need to multiply the three dimensions together:

Volume = Length × Width × Height

In this case, the dimensions are:

Length = 2 inches; Width = 2.5 inches ; Height = 7 inches

Now, multiply the dimensions:

Volume = 2 × 2.5 × 7

Volume = 5 × 7

Volume = 35 cubic inches

To know more about volume visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11168779

#SPJ1

The value of x in the parallelogram is 9.3.

A parallelogram is a quadrilateral that has opposite sides equal to each other. Opposite sides of a parallelogram is also parallel to each other.

The opposite angle of a parallelogram are congruent while consecutive angles of a parallelogram are supplementary.

Therefore,

5x = 2x + 28

5x - 2x = 28

3x = 28

divide both sides of the equation by 3

x = 28 / 3

x = 9.333333

Therefore,

x = 9.3

learn more on parallelogram here: https://brainly.com/question/24022178

#SPJ1

We can say with 95% certainty that the genuine rate of all patients at this clinic who have high blood pressure is between 24% and 42%. 

To develop a 95% certainty interim for the rate of all patients at this clinic that have tall blood weight, we will utilize the equation:

CI = p ± z*(p*(1-p)/n))

where p is the sampling extent, z is the z-score related to the required certainty level (in this case, 1.96 for 95% certainty), and n is the test measure.

We are given that out of a test of 100 patients, 33 have high blood weight. In this manner, the test extent is:

p = 33/100 = 0.33

Utilizing the equation over, we will calculate the edge of the mistake:

Arduino

ME = z*(p*(1-p)/n)) = 1.96*(0.33*(1-0.33)/100)) ≈ 0.09

At that point, we are able to develop the 95% certainty interim:

CI = p ± ME = 0.33 ± 0.09 = (0.24, 0.42)

Hence, able to say with 95% certainty that the genuine rate of all patients at this clinic who have high blood weight is between 24% and 42%. 

To learn about high blood pressure visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29738166

#SPJ4

Answer:

6.4

Step-by-step explanation:

the conditional probability of being from London, given that someone is dissatisfied with their city, is approximately 0.452.

what is conditional probability ?

Conditional probability is the probability of an event A occurring, given that another event B has occurred. It is denoted as P(A | B), read as "the probability of A given B"

In the given question,

Based on the provided information, it seems like you have a table showing the number of satisfied and dissatisfied residents in three cities: Tokyo, London, and Washington D.C. You also have the total number of satisfied residents across all three cities.

The expression P(London|no) represents the conditional probability of someone being from London, given that they are dissatisfied with their city.

Using the formula you provided, we have:

P(London|no) = (P(no and London and don)) / (P(London and don))

where "no" represents being dissatisfied with the city and "don" represents being from the city of interest.

From the table, we see that:

P(no and London and don) = 112

P(London and don) = 248

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

P(London|no) = 112 / (1000 * 248 / 644) ≈ 0.452

Therefore, the conditional probability of being from London, given that someone is dissatisfied with their city, is approximately 0.452.

To know more about conditional probability, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30144287

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

q – 3 = 7 q

-3=6q

q=-1/2

2p=2p

{p∈IR}