The Phoenicians were an ancient civilization that thrived in the Mediterranean region. They made significant contributions in various fields, from seafaring and trade to the development of writing systems. Here are some of the importances of Phoenicians achievements in world history:
1. Seafaring and TradeThe Phoenicians were skilled seafarers who established colonies and trading posts throughout the Mediterranean region. They developed a vast trading network that connected various civilizations, from the ancient Egyptians to the Greeks and Romans. The Phoenicians were also responsible for introducing new crops, such as the banana and sugarcane, to the Mediterranean region.2. Writing SystemsThe Phoenicians developed the first phonetic alphabet, which served as the basis for many modern writing systems. Their alphabet had only 22 characters, making it simpler than the complex hieroglyphics used by the Egyptians. The Phoenician alphabet was adopted by many ancient civilizations, including the Greeks, Romans, and Hebrews.3. Art and ArchitectureThe Phoenicians were skilled artisans who produced exquisite works of art and architecture. They were known for their intricate ivory carvings, gold jewelry, and bronze statues. The Phoenicians also built impressive structures, such as the Temple of Melqart in Tyre and the Palace of Byblos.4. Religious BeliefsThe Phoenicians were a deeply religious people who worshiped a pantheon of gods and goddesses. They believed that these deities controlled the forces of nature, such as the wind and the sea. The Phoenicians also believed in life after death and practiced elaborate funeral rites.5. Influence on Other CulturesThe Phoenicians had a significant influence on other civilizations, from the ancient Greeks to the modern-day Lebanese. Their achievements in fields such as seafaring, trade, and writing paved the way for many later developments in world history. The Phoenicians also helped spread the influence of their own culture through their extensive trading network.
To know more about Cultures , visit ;
https://brainly.com/question/514395
#SPJ11
Rice became an important commercial crop in Georgia
beginning in which decade?
A. the 1730s
B. the 1750s
C. the 1770s
D. the 1790s
Rice was first introduced to Georgia in the 1730s by slaves and freed African Americans from the West Africa Kingdoms of Sierra Leone and Senegal.
The answer is A.
It quickly became an important commercial crop for planters living along the coast of Georgia, especially in the areas of St. Simons Island, Darien, and Sapelo Island. Rice cultivation in Georgia was labor intensive, and it wasn't until the 1770s that planters began to use enslaved workers to expand their commercial cultivation.
Rice cultivation grew in the 1790s, and by the beginning of the 19th century, it had become a major industry in Georgia, with more than 500 plantations employing over 10,000 enslaved African Americans. In that era, Georgia exported more than 10 thousand bushels of rice per year to the Caribbean, Europe, and other colonies in the American colonies. Over the 19th century, rice production in Georgia slowly declined, and by the 1920s the majority of rice acreage in the state had been converted to other crop production.
To know more about African Americans, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29744813
#SPJ4
which kind of government was most heavily influenced by the athenian system? responses anarchy anarchy dictatorship dictatorship representative democracy representative democracy absolute monarchy
The government system that was most heavily influenced by the Athenian system is representative democracy.
Representative democracy is a form of government in which citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. Athenian democracy, developed in ancient Athens, Greece, is often considered the earliest example of democracy in history. It featured direct participation of citizens in decision-making, including voting on laws and policies.
While modern representative democracies differ in various aspects from the Athenian system, such as the scale of governance and the use of elected representatives, they draw inspiration from the principles of citizen participation and popular sovereignty that were central to Athenian democracy.
The Athenian system of democracy had a profound impact on the development of representative democracy. In ancient Athens, all eligible citizens had the right to participate directly in the decision-making process through the Assembly, where they could debate and vote on laws. This concept of popular participation and citizen engagement laid the foundation for the idea that government should be based on the will of the people.
Representative democracy, as seen in many modern nations, adopts a similar principle by allowing citizens to elect representatives who then make decisions on their behalf. While the Athenian system was limited to a relatively small city-state, the principles of citizen involvement and democratic decision-making have been expanded and adapted to larger-scale governance in representative democracies worldwide. Therefore, representative democracy stands as the government system most heavily influenced by the Athenian system.
Learn more about Democracy:
brainly.com/question/30078994
#SPJ11
Does the government have the right or power to suppress dissent in wartime? Peacetime? Why or why not?
Do you think the United States would have risked losing World War I had it not passed the Espionage and Sedition Acts and taken other steps to suppress dissent? Why or why not?
Government lacks the authority to suppress dissent as safeguarding freedom of speech is crucial for democracy.
The impact of suppressing dissent on World War I's outcome remains uncertain due to various influential factors.
1) Freedom of speech and expression are fundamental rights that should be upheld by the government, regardless of the circumstances.
In a democratic society, citizens have the right to voice their opinions, criticize government actions, and engage in peaceful dissent. While there may be limitations on free speech to safeguard national security, these limitations must be narrowly tailored, proportionate, and necessary to prevent abuses of power. Suppressing dissent can lead to a stifling of public discourse, hinder social progress, and erode the foundations of democracy.Even in times of war or crisis, it is crucial to foster an environment where diverse perspectives can be heard, as this encourages critical thinking, accountability, and the potential for constructive solutions to emerge. Balancing national security concerns with the protection of civil liberties is a delicate task, but a government must respect and uphold the right to dissent as a cornerstone of democratic governance.2) The United States' decision to pass the Espionage and Sedition Acts during World War I and suppress dissent was driven by concerns about national security and maintaining morale, but the direct impact on the outcome of the war is uncertain.
While dissent and criticism of the government's actions can have negative effects on morale and potentially aid the enemy, they can also serve as catalysts for public debate, accountability, and improved decision-making. The suppression of dissent can create an environment of fear, stifle innovation, and limit the government's ability to adapt and address challenges effectively.Additionally, dissenting voices can act as a check on government actions, encouraging transparency and preventing abuses of power. It is plausible that allowing dissenting voices to be heard could have led to a more nuanced and informed public discourse, potentially influencing policy decisions and improving the war effort. However, the absence of dissent does not guarantee victory, as military strategy, resources, and international alliances also played significant roles in the outcome of World War I. Ultimately, the impact of suppressing dissent on the war's outcome is difficult to ascertain definitively, and it remains a subject of debate among historians and scholars.For more questions on World War
https://brainly.com/question/13382356
#SPJ8
Why was a time period of the 1820s considered a new era in politics?
Answer: Between the 1820s and 1850, as more white males won the right to vote and political parties became more organized, the character of American democracy changed. It became more partisan and more raucous, a turn that bred ambivalence and even discontent with politics and the dominant parties.
Explanation: ↑
the issues behind the compromise of 1850 included all of the following except
The issues behind the compromise of 1850 included all of the following except the Mexican Cession was divided so no slaves would be permitted north of 36°30' (option A).
The Compromise of 1850 was a series of five laws that were passed by the US Congress. The laws aimed at solving the territorial and slavery issues that arose after the Mexican–American War (1846–1848). The compromise brought some short term peace, but the slavery issue would continue to cause tensions between the North and South. Slavery would become the driving force behind the political, economic, and social events of the United States during the Civil War.
The issues behind the compromise of 1850 included all of the following except: the Mexican Cession was divided so no slaves would be permitted north of 36°30'. The other four issues were included in the compromise of 1850. These issues are as follows: California was admitted as a free state.Slave trade was ended in Washington, D.C.A stronger fugitive slave law passed.Texas ceded land to New Mexico and had its debts funded. The correct option is A.
The complete question is:
The issues behind the compromise of 1850 included all of the following except
A) the Mexican Cession was divided so no slaves would be permitted north of 36°30'.
B) slave trade was ended in Washington, D.C.
C) California was admitted as a free state.
D) a stronger fugitive slave law passed.
E) Texas ceded land to New Mexico and had its debts funded.
For more about Mexican Cession:
https://brainly.com/question/640114
#SPJ4
Arrange the tiles in the correct order for structuring a literary analysis paragraph.
topic sentence
concluding statement
supporting evidence
point about the toplo
explanation of the
sentence
evidence
The order of structuring a literary analysis paragraph is as follows:Topic sentence, Explanation of the topic sentence, Supporting evidence, Explanation of the evidence, Point about the topic, Evidence, Explanation of the evidence, Concluding statement.
Topic sentence: The first sentence of the paragraph, which clearly states the main point you're making about the text. An explanation of how the topic sentence relates to the thesis statement of the essay.
Supporting evidence: Specific examples from the text that support the point you're making in the topic sentence. An explanation of how the evidence supports the point you're making.
Point about the topic: Further analysis of how the evidence relates to the topic and supports the thesis statement.
Evidence: Another piece of specific evidence from the text that supports the point being made. An explanation of how this second piece of evidence supports the point being made.
Concluding statement: A sentence or two that wraps up the paragraph and connects back to the thesis statement.
Learn more about literary analysis paragraph: brainly.com/question/28729592
#SPJ11
According to 1 Kings, the central problem with Solomon's marriages toforeign women was ______.A. Mixed ethnicitiesB. Political compromis
According to 1 Kings, the central problem with Solomon's marriages toforeign women was Political compromis Therefore the correct option is B.
Political compromise According to 1 Kings 11:1-4, King Solomon had many foreign wives and concubines, which was seen as a political compromise that led him away from his devotion to God. The passage states that Solomon loved many foreign women, including Moabites,
Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians, and Hittites, which God had expressly forbidden the Israelites from marrying. These marriages ultimately led to Solomon's downfall and the division of the kingdom after his death.
Hence the correct option is B
To know more about Political compromise visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29759513
#SPJ4
In the 21 century, we see much of Africa ruled by cruel dictators or military leaders. How is this situation connected to European imperialism in Africa?
The colonial system of indirect rule in Africa started a tradition of rule by corrupt leaders.
Buropeans were so cruel that Africans learned to accept cruel treatment by their rulers.
O
Africans have never been able to establish ideals of human rights-after being treated as inferior.
The families of today's African dictators were put in power by impertalinations
In the 21st century, Africa is mostly ruled by cruel dictators or military leaders. The situation is connected to European imperialism in Africa because of the following reasons: The colonial system of indirect rule in Africa began a tradition of rule by corrupt leaders, which continues in many African nations today.
Indirect rule, as defined by the British anthropologist Lord Frederick Lugard, allowed colonial powers to control and exploit African territories while minimizing the expense of maintaining a colonial administration. Africans learned to accept cruel treatment by their rulers as a result of European cruelty. The policies and practices of colonial administrators and European entrepreneurs were often inhumane and exploitative, resulting in the subjugation and oppression of indigenous Africans. Africans never fully established ideals of human rights as a result of being treated as inferior. They were subjected to brutal, oppressive regimes by colonial powers, which persisted after independence. The families of many of today's African dictators were placed in power by imperialists. Many colonial powers had a strategy of co-opting and supporting particular individuals or groups who they believed would assist them in consolidating their control over territories.
Colonial administration refers to the system of governance established by colonial powers in territories under their control. It involves the management and control of these territories, typically located in distant regions or overseas, by the colonial power. The colonial administration's primary objective is to serve the interests of the colonial power while exerting control over the local population and resources.
To get more information about European entrepreneurs visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15718795
#SPJ11
Why does Guha think the emphasis on wilderness preservation is harmful?
What problem does he have with the invocation of Eastern Religion?
Ramachandra Guha, a well-known Indian historian and ecologist, is critical of the emphasis on wilderness preservation because it tends to overlook the needs of marginalized communities who depend on natural resources for their livelihood.
According to him, the proponents of wilderness preservation often paint such areas as devoid of human presence, which is inaccurate and ignores the traditional ecological knowledge and practices of indigenous communities.
Guha also takes issue with the invocation of Eastern religion in environmental discourse, arguing that it leads to a superficial and romanticized view of nature, which can detract from the need for scientific and policy-based solutions to environmental challenges.
To know more about Ramachandra Guha visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32090764
#SPJ4
Which Polish labor leader founded the union Solidarity and helped end communism in Poland? Karol Jozef Wojtyla Lech Walesa Wojciech Jaruzelski Andrzej Gwiazda
Answer:
Lech Walesa
Explanation:
what is turner’s evidence for social breakdown and evolution on the frontier?
Frederick Jackson Turner is most famously known for his studies of the American frontier, as well as his ‘frontier thesis’.
He argued that the frontier was critical to the development of American society and unique character. His evidence for social breakdown and evolution on the frontier was based on his observations of the pioneers’ daily lives. Turner argued that the frontier served as an escape from the oppressive class systems of Europe, and citizens achieved greater autonomy away from urban areas and class divisions.
He also concluded that the frontier provided an economically independent social landscape which was conducive to the development of self-government, and increased the public’s participation in democratic processes. Turner believed that society often resorted to violence to resolve disputes on the frontier, but it also caused people to be more tolerant and understanding of others.
This was integral for the development of strong communities, and Turner wrote extensively about the ‘frontier spirit’ and its far-reaching impact on the development of American society.
To know more about Frederick Jackson Turner, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29629446
#SPJ4
Consider the following research question and choose the primary source that is best suited to answer it.
"What were the long-term consequences of Japanese internment camps in the United States during World War II?"
Primary sources are the raw materials of history. Primary sources are original materials that were created at the time under investigation, such as diaries, letters, speeches, and official documents. These sources are invaluable since they offer firsthand information from people who witnessed or were involved in the event being examined.For instance, personal accounts of Japanese-Americans who were interned in camps during World War II offer a direct perspective of the long-term effects of Japanese internment camps.
By describing the events, they experienced, they provide insight into how internment affected their everyday lives, their communities, and their culture. Personal accounts, letters, and memoirs can be used to show the human cost of internment and the effects that internment had on Japanese-Americans' self-identity and sense of belonging in the US.
Know more about World War II here:
https://brainly.com/question/7589784
#SPJ11
How did English leaders understand the place and role of the American colonies in England’s empire?
In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, English leaders viewed the American colonies as important components of their empire. England recognized that the colonies had the potential to be economically profitable and provided a market for English goods, raw materials, and trade.
The colonies were thought to provide resources to the mother country, thus enhancing the British economy.In addition to this, the American colonies were viewed as valuable land that could be exploited for profit. English leaders believed that the colonies had the potential to expand westward, providing more land and resources.
The colonies also benefitted from the relationship by being provided with military protection and access to English markets. The colonies were allowed to trade with other European countries, but the majority of their trade was with England.The relationship between England and the American colonies was not always smooth, however. T
To know more about resources visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14289367
#SPJ11
What important differences were there between Indian societies in the Southwest, South, and Northeast on the eve of colonization?
Before the colonization, there were some important differences between Indian societies in the Southwest, South, and Northeast. Below are the differences:Southwest Indians:Southwest Indian tribes, such as the Hopi, Zuni, and Pueblo.
The climate in the Southwest was dry, and many of the Indian societies here relied on irrigation for their crops. They were sedentary and also had complex social and religious systems. Additionally, they were matrilineal and maintained a gift-giving economy.Northeast Indians:The Northeast Indian tribes, such as the Iroquois, lived in longhouses.
The Northeast Indians, in general, were less socially stratified than the Southwest Indians.South Indians:South Indian societies, like the Choctaw, Natchez, and Creek, were sedentary and agricultural. They lived in wooden houses and had complex political systems, with the Creek and Choctaw using matrilineal descent.
To know more about colonization visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30900919
#SPJ11
which is not a feature of an ideal ruler in confucianism? responses literary knowledge literary knowledge a sense of tradition a sense of tradition absolute power absolute power a moral example
An ideal ruler in Confucianism does not possess the feature of absolute power. Confucianism emphasizes the importance of benevolent governance.
Confucianism promotes the idea of a virtuous ruler who governs with wisdom and compassion. Literary knowledge is considered essential for a ruler to make informed decisions and lead effectively. By studying classical texts and engaging in intellectual pursuits, the ruler gains knowledge and wisdom to guide their governance. Furthermore, a sense of tradition is valued in Confucianism, as it provides a framework for ethical behavior and social harmony. The ruler's adherence to traditional values and customs fosters stability and continuity in society.
Moreover, the ideal ruler in Confucianism is expected to serve as a moral example. Confucius believed that a ruler's virtuous conduct would inspire and guide the people towards ethical behavior. By embodying moral virtues such as benevolence, righteousness, and integrity, the ruler sets an example for the entire society to follow. This moral leadership fosters a harmonious and just society where individuals uphold ethical principles and fulfill their roles and responsibilities.
In contrast, absolute power is not considered an attribute of an ideal ruler in Confucianism. Confucius emphasized the importance of a ruler's accountability to the people and the need for checks and balances to prevent abuses of power. The ruler's authority is not absolute but is grounded in the well-being and prosperity of the governed. A ruler who exercises power without restraint or consideration for the welfare of the people would deviate from the ideal envisioned by Confucianism.
Learn more about Confucianism:
brainly.com/question/32004695
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements is true according to the Mandate of Heaven.
A- The Zhou dynasty must rule forever
B- Floods were caused by peasant uprisings
C- If a ruler was corrupt or incompetent, they would love the Mandate of Heaven
D- A dynasty could never be overthrown
Which of the following statements describe the Soviet Union in the years after World War II? Select all that apply.
used a Communist economic system
placed restrictions on personal freedoms
had a democratic form of government
used a capitalist economic system
was ruled by a dictator
valued personal freedoms
The Soviet Union in the years after World War II used a Communist economic system, placed restrictions on personal freedoms, and was ruled by a dictator.
The Soviet Union, under the leadership of Joseph Stalin, employed a Communist economic system characterized by state ownership of the means of production and centralized economic planning. This system aimed to eliminate private ownership and promote social equality. As a result, the state exerted significant control over economic activities, including industry, agriculture, and trade.
In terms of personal freedoms, the Soviet Union imposed restrictions on various aspects of individual liberty. The government maintained strict control over freedom of speech, press, and assembly, suppressing dissent and opposition to its policies. Censorship was pervasive, and political dissidents were often persecuted, imprisoned, or sent to labor camps. The Soviet regime prioritized state security and control over the rights and liberties of its citizens.
To learn more about dictator.
Click here:brainly.com/question/30940553?
#SPJ11
Gerstle presents evidence that Theodore Roosevelt praised the way black troops fought in Cuba. Yet, he also asserts, "Roosevelt was never entirely comfortable with the way in which blacks had fought alongside whites." How does Gerstle solve this contradiction?
Question 3 options:
a)
He argues that Roosevelt opposed complete and unregulated mixing of the races because it produced a mediocre race.
b)
He demonstrates Roosevelt later modified the history of black soldiers in Cuba.
c)
He presents evidence that Roosevelt perceived black soldiers as depended on commands from white offices.
d)
All of the above
He argues that Roosevelt opposed the complete and unregulated mixing of the races because it produced a mediocre race it is the correct answer. Option A is correct.
From 1901 to 1909 under the leadership of Theodore Roosevelt the First U.S. Volunteer Cavalry was named the "Rough Riders" and it was the most famous of all the units fighting in Cuba. Due to his regulatory reforms and antitrust prosecutions, he earned a reputation as a "trust buster" and he is a Progressive reformer.
Theodore Roosevelt believed in the existence of a racial hierarchy, with white men of European descent at the top. This belief shaped his attitudes on race relations, land rights, American imperialism, and the emerging science of eugenics. Roosevelt’s views on race were complex and sometimes contradictory.
To learn more about Theodore Roosevelt :
https://brainly.com/question/30319865
#SPJ4
it destroyed a european coalition of austrian, polish, bavarian, and saxon forces at vienna in 1683 and held the city for ten years.
The occasion that destroyed a European coalition of Austrian, Polish, Bavarian, and Saxon forces at Vienna in 1683 and held the metropolis for ten years was the Siege of Vienna via the Ottoman Empire. This pivotal event in records marked the climax of the Ottoman-Habsburg wars and had some distance-achieving outcomes for the balance of power in Europe.
In the summer of 1683, the sizable Ottoman army led by Grand Vizier Kara Mustafa Pasha, laid siege to Vienna, the capital of the Habsburg Empire. The town became a strategic stronghold and a key gateway to Central Europe. The coalition of forces from Austria, Poland, Bavaria, and Saxony joined collectively to defend Vienna in opposition to the Ottoman danger.
For months, the defenders of Vienna endured a grueling siege, withstanding regular assaults and desperate tries to breach the metropolis's walls. The state of affairs seemed dire for the European coalition as materials diminished and morale wavered. However, comfort eventually arrived on September 12, 1683, whilst a blended force led by using Polish King Jan III Sobieski released a decisive counter-assault.
Sobieski's cavalry price, famously known as the Battle of Vienna, broke via the Ottoman traces and brought a crushing blow to the besieging army. The Ottoman forces have been routed, and Vienna become liberated from the hazard of occupation. This victory marked a turning point in the centuries-long battle between the Ottoman Empire and Christian Europe.
The defeat at Vienna had profound outcomes for the Ottoman Empire. It shattered the myth of Ottoman invincibility and uncovered the vulnerabilities of their military. Moreover, the failure to seize Vienna halted the Ottoman enhance into Europe and marked the beginning of a slow decline in their territorial expansion.
For the European coalition, the hit protection of Vienna introduced a sense of unity and reinforced the remedy to push back toward Ottoman aggression. The victory at Vienna additionally had wider implications for European geopolitics. It reinforced the power and status of the Habsburgs, bolstered the alliance between Austria and Poland, and helped solidify the wider European competition against the Ottoman Empire.
In conclusion, the Siege of Vienna in 1683, followed with the aid of the successful defense and liberation of the metropolis with the aid of the European coalition, marked a massive turning point in European history. It dealt a severe blow to the Ottoman Empire, halted its enlargement into Europe, and galvanized Christian Europe in its resistance against Ottoman aggression.
To know more about the Ottoman Empire,
https://brainly.com/question/28902104
#SPJ4
The correct question is:
"What event destroyed a European coalition of Austrian, Polish, Bavarian, and Saxon forces at Vienna in 1683 and held the city for ten years? "
evaluate the change in mortality over the course of the twentieth century. group of answer choices increased dramatically in the first 50 years and then more gradually in the second 50 years. increased at a very steady rate throughout the 100-year period. increased gradually in the first 50 years and then very dramatically in the second 50 years. did not change significantly.
The mortality rate changed significantly over the course of the twentieth century. It increased gradually in the first 50 years and then experienced a more dramatic increase in the second 50 years.
The mortality rate underwent notable changes during the twentieth century. In the first 50 years, the increase in mortality was relatively gradual. This can be attributed to factors such as improvements in healthcare, advancements in medical technology, and the implementation of public health measures. These developments contributed to a decline in infectious diseases, improved living conditions, and increased life expectancy.
Overall, the mortality rate in the twentieth century followed a pattern of gradual increase in the first 50 years, reflecting improvements in healthcare and public health measures. However, in the second half of the century, the rate of increase became more pronounced due to changing demographic trends and the emergence of new health challenges.
To learn more about mortality.
Click here:brainly.com/question/29376879?
#SPJ11
as the western roman empire slowly disintegrated, which of the following germanic kingdoms emerged to take its place?
As the Western Roman Empire gradually disintegrated, several Germanic kingdoms emerged to fill the power vacuum. These included the Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Vandals, and Lombards, who established their own independent realms across different parts of Western Europe.
Following the decline and eventual fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century, various Germanic kingdoms emerged and took control of different regions previously under Roman rule. The Visigoths, led by Alaric, established their kingdom in Hispania (modern-day Spain and Portugal) and later in parts of Gaul (modern-day France).
The Ostrogoths, under the leadership of Theodoric the Great, formed a kingdom in Italy. The Vandals, led by Genseric, established their realm in North Africa, including the region of modern-day Tunisia, Algeria, and parts of Libya. Lastly, the Lombards, a Germanic tribe, founded the Lombard Kingdom in Italy. These Germanic kingdoms represented new political entities that replaced the centralized authority of the Western Roman Empire and played significant roles in shaping the subsequent political landscape of Western Europe.
Learn more about Germanic kingdoms here: brainly.com/question/31628119
#SPJ11
which site is believed to have been the site of an ancient elite burial and shrine? a. blombos cave c. igbo ukwu
Answer:c. Igbo Ukwu
Explanation: Igbo-Ukwu is a city located in the state of Anambra. It is an important archaeological site, as it was a civilization that developed in eastern Nigeria between the 9th and 10th centuries. It is characterized by its work in copper (from the Aïr Mountains) and bronze. Discovered accidentally in 1938 by a resident who was digging a well, it cannot be linked to any other culture in the region, but it reveals the existence of a powerful and refined kingdom.
The site believed to have been the site of an ancient elite burial and shrine is Igbo-Ukwu.
Igbo-Ukwu is a town in southeastern Nigeria known for its rich archaeological heritage. It was discovered that the community had been established around 800 AD and existed till the 9th century AD. Igbo-Ukwu is one of the significant archeological sites in Nigeria and Africa.
Its famous discoveries include exotic copper artifacts such as intricately decorated staffs, crowns, pendants, breastplates, and jewelry, among others. These objects are believed to have been used for the burial of the ancient elite. The discoveries are dated between the 9th century AD and 10th century AD.
To learn more about elite, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30396807
#SPJ11
galileo was an intellectual that would not acecept an argument
Galileo was an intellectual who would not accept an argument without proof.
He was one of the most important figures of the Scientific Revolution and made significant contributions to the fields of astronomy, mathematics, and physics. Galileo was born in Pisa, Italy, in 1564 and was educated at the University of Pisa. He worked as a professor of mathematics at the University of Pisa before moving on to the University of Padua, where he taught mathematics and philosophy.
Galileo is famous for his work in astronomy. He used a telescope to make groundbreaking observations of the Moon, Venus, and Jupiter, among other celestial bodies. These observations confirmed the Copernican model of the solar system, which stated that the Earth and other planets revolve around the Sun.
Galileo's observations and experiments were controversial, and he faced opposition from the Catholic Church, which held that the Earth was the center of the universe. In 1633, he was put on trial by the Inquisition and forced to recant his views. Despite this setback, Galileo continued to work on his research until his death in 1642.
For more about Galileo;
https://brainly.com/question/30768472
#SPJ4
is there a dimension of industry structure that porter’s model appears to omit?
The dimension of industry structure that porter's model appears to omit was the external environmental factors.
The term "external environmental factor" refers to a broader set of economic, social, and technological variables that might have an impact on an industry's or market's competitive dynamics. These uncontrollable variables may present possibilities or hazards to particular firms operations.
Numerous unanticipated pitfalls exist, such as those brought on by globalization, industrialization, and digitalization, which drastically alter customer expectations and spur new competitors in unexpected ways that raise the stakes. Porter's industrial structure model did not account for these hazards, which are typical for industry to confront.
Learn more about Porter's model of industry structure ,
https://brainly.com/question/30613638?
Yes, there is a dimension of industry structure that Porter’s model appears to omit. The correct option among the following given options is option (B) Innovation. Innovation is the dimension of industry structure that Porter’s model appears to omit. What is Porter's Five Forces Model? Porter's Five Forces Model is a competitive strategy framework that assesses an industry's attractiveness (profit potential).
Porter's five forces model examines the bargaining power of buyers and suppliers, the competitive rivalry among existing players, the risk of new entrants, and the threat of substitutes. It is an analytical framework for assessing competitive rivalry, threats of new entrants, threats of substitute products or services, bargaining power of suppliers, and bargaining power of customers. It assists businesses in making informed strategic decisions.
Know more about Porter’s model here:
https://brainly.com/question/30510553
#SPJ11
What contribution to modern science was made by Andreas Vesalius?
a. He created a vaccination that helped reduce the death rate across Europe in the 16th century.
b. He published On the Structure of the Human Body which became the foundation of modern anatomy.
c. He is considered to be the founder of physiology due to his extensive research on circulation.
d. He wrote public letters condemning the Church for its non-acceptance of early scientific thought.
What did Newton's book Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy argue about the role of mathematics in understanding the natural world?
a. Newton's book argued that mathematics and physical science were separate and could not explain each other.
b. Newton's book argued that gravity could not be explained by mathematics alone.
c. Newton's book made the bold argument that physical science required the use of faith to understand the natural world.
d. Newton's book argued that mathematical principles could be applied to our understanding of the natural world.
How did the Renaissance rediscovery of the work of Egyptian astronomer Ptolemy help start the Scientific Revolution?
a. Ptolemy's system no longer seemed to work with what scientists were observing, and scientists began to look for other theories.
b. Scientists were forbidden to read Ptolemy.
c. Scientists wanted to prove that Ptolemy's theory of the universe was correct.
d. Scientists discovered new writing by Ptolemy.
Contribution to modern science was made by Andreas Vesalius b. He published On the Structure of the Human Body which became the foundation of modern anatomy. Newton's book Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy argue d. that mathematical principles could be applied to our understanding of the natural world. The Renaissance rediscovery of the work of Egyptian astronomer a. Ptolemy's system no longer seemed to work with what scientists were observing, and scientists began to look for other theories.
Andreas Vesalius, who was an anatomist and physician, contributed to modern science through his work on the human body's structure.
Vesalius published his work On the Structure of the Human Body, which is considered to be the foundation of modern anatomy, option B.
In this book, he refuted earlier teachings about the human body's structure, mainly those of Galen.
He emphasized that the human body's structure could be learned through dissection and direct observation.
In the 16th century, the vaccination that helped reduce the death rate across Europe was created by Edward Jenner.
Therefore, option A is not correct.
Vesalius is not considered to be the founder of physiology.
Though he contributed significantly to the field of physiology, this title is usually given to a German physiologist named Albrecht von Haller.
Hence, option C is incorrect.
Vesalius wrote public letters criticizing the Church for its non-acceptance of early scientific thought, but this is not his significant contribution to modern science.
Therefore, option D is incorrect.
The book Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy was written by Isaac Newton.
It argued that mathematical principles could be applied to our understanding of the natural world, option D.
According to Newton, mathematics was an essential tool for unlocking the secrets of the universe, including gravity, the motions of planets, and the properties of light.
Therefore, options A, B, and C are incorrect.
The Renaissance rediscovery of the work of Egyptian astronomer Ptolemy helped start the Scientific Revolution because Ptolemy's system no longer seemed to work with what scientists were observing, and scientists began to look for other theories, option A.
During this period, there were significant developments in various fields, including astronomy, physics, and mathematics.
Therefore, options B, C, and D are incorrect.
For more questions on Newton
https://brainly.com/question/12896892
#SPJ8
which of the following represented a change in the labor force of the southern british colonies by the 1700s as depicted in the excerpt? responses slavery became more widespread than indentured servitude. slavery became more widespread than indentured servitude. the rise of manufacturing led to an increased need for skilled artisans and craftsmen. the rise of manufacturing led to an increased need for skilled artisans and craftsmen. the encomienda was adopted from the spanish to provide native american workers. the encomienda was adopted from the spanish to provide native american workers. people newly freed from slavery frequently worked on plantations.
The change in the labor force of the southern British colonies by the 1700s, as depicted in the excerpt, is that slavery became more widespread than indentured servitude. This was driven by the demand for labor in agriculture.
The change in the labor force of the southern British colonies by the 1700s as depicted in the excerpt is that slavery became more widespread than indentured servitude.
The excerpt mentioned, "The labor force in the southern British colonies became increasingly dependent on African slaves for labor, both because they were easier to manage and because their skin color and language made them less likely to escape."
Hence, it is clearly indicated that slavery became more widespread than indentured servitude represented a change in the labor force of the southern British colonies by the 1700s.
The practice of slavery became so widespread in the southern colonies of British America due to the demand for labor in tobacco, rice, and indigo cultivation.
Learn more about slavery : brainly.com/question/9374853
#SPJ11
why the industrial revolution didn't happen in china answers
Answer:
The reasons for why the Industrial Revolution did not occur in China are complex and multifaceted. Some possible factors that may have contributed to this include a lack of infrastructure, political instability, a strong agricultural tradition, limited access to resources, and cultural factors. While some historians argue that China did experience some form of industrialization during the Ming and Qing dynasties, it did not lead to the same level of economic and social transformation as the Industrial Revolution in the West.
The Industrial Revolution didn't occur in that frame of mind because of a mix of internal and external factors. These elements incorporate China's customary agrarian economy, political and social unsteadiness, neutralist arrangements, and absence of innovative head-ways.
China had a long history of being an agrarian culture, with horticulture filling in as the pillar of the economy. This emphasis on farming obstructed the improvement of industrialization, as there was restricted speculation and framework in assembling and mechanical progressions.
Political and social unsteadiness in China during the hour of the modern upheaval additionally presented huge difficulties. Continuous contentions, dynastic changes, and inner battles for control redirected assets and consideration from modern turn of events. China's neutralist approaches, like the limitation of unfamiliar exchange and impact, further restricted openness to outside thoughts, advances, and capital that might have animated industrialization.
Besides, China lingered behind in mechanical head-ways contrasted with nations like England, which were at the very front of industrialization. The shortfall of essential developments and advancements, like the steam motor, automated material creation, and productive transportation frameworks, blocked the rise of a modern upset in China.
To learn more about Industrial Revolution,
https://brainly.com/question/26817561
"Bleeding Kansas" referred to what?
Answer:
Explanation:
"Bleeding Kansas" refers to a period of violent political and ideological conflict that occurred in the Kansas Territory of the United States from 1854 to 1861.
Hope it helps!
which groups made up the republican party and what was the party's major goal?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Republican Party in the United States was primarily composed of various groups, including former Whigs, anti-slavery activists, and northern Democrats. Its major goal was to halt the spread of slavery and ultimately abolish it. Founded in the mid-1850s, the party sought to unite individuals and factions who were against the expansion of slavery into new territories.
Through their advocacy for free soil, economic development, and moral opposition to slavery, the Republicans played a crucial role in the lead-up to the American Civil War and the eventual emancipation of enslaved people.
hope it helps!
Why might King Lo Bengula feel he was tricked into signing the contract?
King Lo Bengula of the Ndebele people in southern Africa might have felt he was tricked into signing the contract with Cecil Rhodes in 1888 because of several reasons.
One of the reasons was that King Lo Bengula was not very familiar with the European way of negotiating and was probably unaware of the legal consequences of signing the contract.
Another reason was that the English text of the agreement and the Ndebele language version differed greatly in their content and interpretation of the terms of the contract.
The Ndebele language version contained much broader and vague terms than the English version which limited the power and authority of the king.
As a result, King Lo Bengula may have believed that he had agreed to a far more limited concession than he had actually signed up for.
King Lo Bengula may have also been deceived by his own advisors, who may have failed to warn him of the true nature of the agreement.
Therefore, due to all these reasons, King Lo Bengula might have felt he was tricked into signing the contract
For more questions on King Lo Bengula
https://brainly.com/question/2986730
#SPJ8
Answer:
As a response from the queen's advisor, Lobengula was told it was "impossible for them to exclude white men". Lobengula informed Queen Victoria he and his Indunas would recognize the contract as they believe he was tricked.