Based on Source C, the claim that best explains how the Mayan ruler was chosen is option B: "The king was considered a sacred ruler, one who governed by divine right.
Believed to be the descendant of a god, a king’s authority was unquestioned and absolute." This claim suggests that the Mayan ruler was chosen based on their perceived divine ancestry and authority, rather than any democratic or merit-based process. The text emphasizes that the king's authority was absolute and unquestioned, further supporting this claim.
The Maya civilization was a Mesoamerican civilization that flourished in the regions of present-day southern Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, and western Honduras from about 2000 BCE until the Spanish conquest in the 16th century. The Mayan society was highly hierarchical, with the ruler or king, known as the "halach uinic," at the top of the social order.
Option B is correct
Learn more about Mayan ruler here:
https://brainly.com/question/19776782
#SPJ1
example of meta ethics
Answer:
example, the metaethicist might discuss how people use moral language; or comment on the psychology of immoral people; or ask whether moral properties exist.