The ruling described in the given excerpt is most similar to other civil rights achievements that happened in the 1960s in that it represented responses by the federal government to calls for the expansion of civil rights. One of the main objectives of the Civil Rights Movement was to make a significant effort to desegregate public schools all across the United States.
What successes could be attributed to the 1960s civil rights movement?The landmark 1964 Act outlawed discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin in places of public accommodation, like hotels, restaurants, and theatres. A commission called the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was created to assist in enforcing the law and prohibited discrimination in employment procedures.
One of the most significant pieces of legislation to come out of the civil rights movement was the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin and put an end to segregation in public places.
To learn more about civil rights, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30274544
#SPJ1
Why do you think the election of 1860 served as the tipping point between union and secession in the ongoing debate on slavery?
The reason the election of 1860 served as the tipping point between union and secession was that it led to the leadership of the Republican party which was anti- slavery.
How did the election of 1860 change things ?In American politics, slavery had become a prolonged matter that caused tension and emotional division between the Northern and Southern states. The focus was on whether new territories should permit slavery or not.
When Lincoln assumed office, his election served as a trigger for many Southerners to consider secession imminent. They believed that his term would eventually lead to the removal of slavery, thereby destroying their way of life and economy.
Find out more on the election of 1860 at https://brainly.com/question/16649248
#SPJ1
(ch5) Interactions between Muslims and Europeans during the 7th century are most commonly found in the...
Interactions between Muslims and Europeans during the 7th century are most commonly found in the context of the Arab-Byzantine Wars, which were a series of conflicts between the Arab Rashidun Caliphate and the Byzantine Empire.
These interactions were marked by military conquests, diplomatic negotiations, and cultural exchanges. The Arab conquests of Syria, Egypt, and North Africa brought Muslims into contact with European Christians, Jews, and pagans. Muslim scholars and merchants traveled to Europe, while European scholars and traders traveled to Muslim lands. These interactions paved the way for the development of Islamic civilization and the spread of Islamic influence in Europe. Interactions between Muslims and Europeans during the 7th century are most commonly found in the Mediterranean region. This is due to the expansion of the Islamic Caliphate and the establishment of trade and cultural exchanges between Muslim and European societies.
Learn more about diplomatic negotiations :
https://brainly.com/question/30286008
#SPJ11
. Al Qaeda was organized to
Al Qaeda was organized to promote its extremist ideology and to carry out violent attacks against those it perceived as enemies of Islam. The group has been designated as a terrorist organization by many countries and continues to pose a significant threat to global security.
i dont what answer
Explanation:
because of you
TRUE OR FALSE: The initial demands of the movement was not just the desegregation of Montgomery buses, but the desegregation of all public facilities in Montgomery.
True
False
The Montgomery Bus Boycott, which began in December 1955, was sparked by the arrest of Rosa Parks for refusing to give up her seat to a white person on a Montgomery bus.
The initial demands of the movement were not limited to the desegregation of buses, but rather extended to the desegregation of all public facilities in Montgomery Boycott, including restaurants, schools, and libraries. The leaders of the movement recognized that segregation was a pervasive problem in society and sought to challenge it on multiple fronts.
The Montgomery boycott was a catalyst for a larger civil rights movement that ultimately achieved significant gains in the fight against segregation and discrimination.
Learn more about Montgomery buses here
https://brainly.com/question/30337002
#SPJ1
Civil rights advocates shifted their focus away from public accommodations to voting rights after 1964 because
Answer: After the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in public accommodations, employment, and education, civil rights advocates shifted their focus to voting rights. This was because while the Civil Rights Act was a significant achievement, it did not address the issue of voting rights, which remained a major obstacle for African Americans in the South.
Explanation: Prior to the Civil Rights Act, segregation and discrimination were legally enforced in public accommodations such as restaurants, hotels, and transportation systems. The passage of the law made it illegal to discriminate on the basis of race, but it did not guarantee that African Americans would be able to exercise their right to vote. Discriminatory practices such as literacy tests, poll taxes, and intimidation tactics were still being used to prevent African Americans from voting.
______ established the details for organizing the judicial system.
The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the details for organizing the judicial system in the United States.
This federal legislation laid the foundation for the structure and jurisdiction of the federal court system, as mandated by Article III of the U.S. Constitution. The act created the three-tiered system we know today, consisting of the Supreme Court, appellate courts, and district courts.
The Supreme Court, as the highest court in the nation, has the power to interpret the Constitution and federal laws. It is composed of one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate.
Appellate courts, also known as circuit courts, are the middle tier in the judicial system. They review decisions made by district courts, ensuring the correct application of the law. There are currently 13 appellate courts, each serving a designated region of the country.
District courts, as the lowest tier, are the federal trial courts with jurisdiction over civil and criminal cases. They are responsible for applying federal law, interpreting statutes, and determining the facts of a case. There are 94 district courts in the United States, with at least one in each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
For more such questions on judicial system, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/1269129
#SPJ11
The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the details for organizing the judicial system.
The Judiciary Act of 1789 is the legislation that established the details for organizing the judicial system in the United States. It created the Supreme Court, as well as the lower federal courts, and established the office of the attorney general. The act also outlined the jurisdiction of the federal courts and created the position of the United States Marshals to serve as federal law enforcement officers. The Judiciary Act of 1789 was signed into law by President George Washington on September 24, 1789, and is considered one of the most significant laws in the history of the United States judiciary.
To know more about The Judiciary Act of 1789
brainly.com/question/29548303
#SPJ11
During meals Gulliver was constantly plagued by...?
During meals in Lilliput, Gulliver was constantly plagued by the Lilliputians, who were very small in size and would swarm around him, trying to steal his food.
The main character and narrator of Jonathan Swift's book "Gulliver's Travels" is Gulliver. A British sailor, he visits numerous places and comes into contact with a variety of people, from the small Lilliputians to the giants of Brobdingnag. Gulliver offers a sarcastic reflection on human nature and the society in which we live via his travels. Both Gulliver the character and the book "Gulliver's Travels" are regarded as classics of English literature.
The Lilliputians, who were extremely few people, would crowd around Gulliver at meals in Lilliput and try to steal his food. To get the meal to Gulliver's lips, they even used a unique device that resembled a little crane. Despite their best attempts, Gulliver discovered the Lilliputians to be pleasant and wise, and throughout his time in Lilliput, he discovered a lot about their way of life.
To learn more about Gulliver, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30103544
#SPJ4
Why do you think that Einhard drew on ancient knowledge time and again?
He thought it contained knowledge that was applicable to his own time, Einhard frequently drew on old knowledge.
Why do you think that Einhard drew on ancient knowledge time and again?Einhard was a student and historian, knowledgeable in the classical writings, and greatly admired the knowledge of the ancients. Many works from the time of ancient Greece and Rome also addressed issues like politics, morals, and literature that were still important in mediaeval Europe. By using these resources, Einhard is able to show the persistence of European civilisation throughout history and provide a historical framework for his own work. The development of the mind and the encouragement of virtue, which were significant objectives in mediaeval education, were, in his view, also achieved by the study of ancient knowledge.
To Know more about Ancient Art Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9500113
#SPJ1
Explain how and why globalization changed international interactions among states (in the 20th and 21st centuries).
Globalization refers to the increasing interconnectedness and interdependence of people, businesses, and countries around the world. In the 20th and 21st centuries, globalization has transformed international interactions among states in several ways.
One way globalization has changed international interactions is through the expansion of trade and investment. Globalization has enabled countries to trade and invest with one another more easily than ever before. This has led to increased economic growth and prosperity for many countries, but has also contributed to job loss and income inequality in others.
Globalization has also facilitated the spread of technology, ideas, and culture across borders. Advances in communication and transportation technologies have made it easier for people to share ideas and culture, leading to greater cultural exchange and the spread of popular culture around the world.
Another way globalization has changed international interactions is through the growth of multinational corporations. These companies have operations and employees in multiple countries, and their activities can have significant impacts on global economic and political systems.
Finally, globalization has led to increased awareness and concern about global issues such as climate change, poverty, and human rights. These issues are increasingly recognized as requiring international cooperation and coordination to address effectively.
Overall, globalization has transformed international interactions among states by facilitating trade and investment, spreading technology and culture, enabling the growth of multinational corporations, and increasing awareness of global issues. While globalization has brought many benefits, it has also created new challenges and risks that require careful consideration and management.
~~~Harsha~~~
7. In the war on terror, the United States targeted the terrorist group
Answer:
I do believe the answer is B as in boy.
When thinking about politics in the United States, your mind might immediately turn to the two major political parties: the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. Would it surprise you to know that there are more than two parties in other countries?
Some countries, such as the United Kingdom, allow for many political parties to form, but in practice have only two or three. Other countries, such as Denmark, Germany, and Mexico, tend to have three or more parties represented in government at all times. With so many parties, gaining a majority in the legislature becomes difficult and agreements between two or more parties to temporarily work together in a coalition are common.
In the United States, however, having only two major political parties has become the norm. These two parties have developed an antagonistic relationship in which the members of one party refuse to work or agree with members of the other party. The idea of being so committed to the politics of your party is called partisanship.
Let’s explore the relationship of the political parties to each other, how partisanship affects the political process in the United States, and whether partisan politics are beneficial or detrimental to US society.
Based on your own knowledge, why are partisanship and a two-party system significant parts of US politics?
Answer: by looking up this is the information I can find
Explanation:Political factions or parties began to form during the struggle over ratification of the federal Constitution of 1787. Friction between them increased as attention shifted from the creation of a new federal government to the question of how powerful that federal government would be. The Federalists, led by Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton, wanted a strong central government, while the Anti-Federalists, led by Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson, advocated states’ rights instead of centralized power. Federalists coalesced around the commercial sector of the country while their opponents drew their strength from those favoring an agrarian society. The ensuing partisan battles led George Washington to warn of “the baneful effects of the spirit of party” in his Farewell Address as president of United States.
Describe the living conditions for many Mexican migrant laborers
Answer:
horrible since they were usually racially judged for their race and etc
Explanation:
The Senate must approve of the president's choice for each of the following offices except that of
The Senate must approve of the president's choice for each of the following offices except that of the president's choice for the office of Vice President.
One of the two chambers of the US Congress, which is the legislative arm of the US federal government, is the Senate. Regardless of the size of the state, the Senate has 100 senators, two from each state. One-third of the Senate is up for election every two years, and senators are elected to six-year terms. Presidential nominees for high-level positions, including Supreme Court judges, Cabinet members, and ambassadors, may be accepted or rejected by the Senate. Additionally, the Senate has the authority to approve treaties and attempt the impeachment of government authorities.
Vice President nominees made by the president are not subject to Senate confirmation. The Vice President is chosen by the President in accordance with the United States Constitution. The Senate or any other body is not required to confirm the choice. For other important posts in the government, such as Supreme Court judges, Cabinet members, and ambassadors, the Senate must nonetheless ratify the president's nomination.
To learn more about Senate, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/26823952
#SPJ4
Your question is incomplete. The complete question is:
The Senate must approve of the president's choice for each of the following offices except that of what?
Journalists want to be free of government limits on their work. Government officials want some control over the media. Taking the point of view of a journalist or a government official, write a paragraph to persuade others to your position on how much the government should be able to restrict what the media report
As one of the cornerstones of democracy is media, which should represent objectivity and truthfulness.
There are many examples of manipulation of media by the governments of countries, to their favor. This act is a sign of danger and loss of freedom.
How much should government regulate Media?Media utilised for governmental objectives should be subject to regulation. a warning or notification, etc. Never utilise it for your own agenda.
Information that has a high ability to sway attitudes comes from the media. Any democracy may be in peril if the public develops an incorrect view. Governments should stop utilising them for their own interests in modern times.
What is the State of Media today?The basic freedom to access information through an independent press is being attacked, and part of the attack has come from an unexpected place.
Many democracies' elected officials, who ought to be the strongest advocates for press freedom, have taken overt efforts to stifle outlets that publish unfavourable stories and bolster those that favourably report them.
The erosion of press freedom is both a symptom of and a contributor to the downfall of other democratic institutions and ideals, which makes the trend all the more concerning given that it is connected to a worldwide decrease in democracy itself.
To know more about Democracy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ1
Based on the reading, why did Andrew Jackson give the appoint of Collector of the Port of New York to Samuel Swartwout?
These factors may include political connections, qualifications and experience, loyalty to the president or administration, and other considerations.
Why did Andrew Jackson give the appoint of Collector of the Port of New York to Samuel Swartwout?general, appointments to key positions like the Collector of the Port of New York can be influenced by a variety of factors. These factors may include political connections, qualifications and experience, loyalty to the president or administration, and other considerations. It is possible that Andrew Jackson appointed Samuel Swartwout to this position for any number of these reasons.
Read more onv Andrew Jackson here:https://brainly.com/question/340840
#SPJ1
What was the early 19th century movement in art and thought?
The early 19th century movement in art and thought was Romanticism. It emerged in Europe in the late 18th century as a response to the Enlightenment's focus on reason and logic. Romanticism emphasized emotions, individualism, nature, and imagination. It celebrated the beauty of the natural world, emphasized the importance of the individual's inner feelings and experiences, and often rejected social norms and conventions. In art, Romanticism was characterized by a focus on emotion and drama, and artists often depicted scenes from nature, exotic places, or historical events in a highly dramatic and emotional manner. Romanticism had a significant impact on literature, music, art, and philosophy, and its influence can still be seen in contemporary culture.
Hope this helps.
At the end of the Trustee Period many of the regulations were lifted. Of the original Trustee regulations, which was not changed?
At the end of the Trustee Period, many regulations were indeed lifted. However, one original Trustee regulation that was not changed was the prohibition on slavery.
It remained in place until Georgia later became a royal colony The Georgia Trustees prohibited slavery because it conflicted with their vision of small landowners prospering from their own labor. They also wanted Georgia to serve as a military buffer between the English colonies and Spanish Florida. The Spanish offer of freedom to slaves in exchange for military service would undermine Georgia’s security. But eventually, the lure of wealth by forced labor proved too tempting and the ban on slavery was finally overturned in 1751.
Learn more about slavery here: https://brainly.com/question/9331183
#SPJ11
the answers for this please help i need the answers by tonight!
In order to determine guilt in a criminal case, there are five steps to follow which include:
The Five StepsFirst is the arrest and charge stage. Law enforcement authorities must have probable cause before arresting someone and charging them with an offense.
After that comes the preliminary hearing stage where the defendant gets apprised of their charges. The judge then decides whether there's enough evidence available for the procedure to proceed to trial.
Next comes the arraignment phase where the accused enters a plea of their choice- guilty or not guilty – regarding the allegations against them.
Moving onto the fourth step, during the trial, both the prosecution and defense present their arguments. In support of its stance, the prosecution provides tangible proof such as witness testimony beyond reasonable doubt.
Lastly, if proven guilty, the judge moves forward to the sentencing stage where s/he determines penalties based on applicable factors which may involve fines, community service, probation, or even incarceration.
Read more about criminal cases her:
https://brainly.com/question/30665538
#SPJ1
In Terry v. Ohio (1968), the US Supreme Court ruled on:A. Stop and friskB. The open field doctrineC. The plain view doctrineD. The privacy doctrine
In Terry v. Ohio (1968), the US Supreme Court ruled on "stop and frisk". So, option A is correct.
Stop and frisk is a police practice of stopping individuals on the street and patting them down for weapons if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the person is engaged in criminal activity.
The Supreme Court held that such a stop and frisk did not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures if the officer had reasonable suspicion that the individual was involved in criminal activity and if the scope of the search was limited to a pat-down for weapons.
The decision has had a significant impact on law enforcement practices and the balance between individual rights and public safety.
Learn more about stop and frisk :
https://brainly.com/question/29617862
#SPJ4
Politics of Elitism (replacing the privilaged)
While the politics of elitism aim to promote social mobility and equal opportunities, critics argue that it can create a new form of elitism and raise concerns about fairness in the selection process.
The politics of elitism aim to replace the privileged with a new elite that is based on merit and competence rather than wealth, social status, or other arbitrary factors. This approach to governance seeks to promote social mobility and equal opportunities for all individuals by providing them with access to education, training, and other resources that can help them develop the skills and competencies needed to succeed in their chosen fields.
The idea behind this political philosophy is that individuals should be judged based on their abilities and potential rather than their background or social status. This can help to break down the barriers that prevent individuals from achieving their full potential and create a more just and equitable society.
However, critics of this approach argue that it can lead to a new form of elitism where those who are deemed to be the most talented or competent are granted disproportionate power and influence over society. Additionally, there may be concerns about the fairness of the selection process and whether it truly provides equal opportunities for all individuals.
To learn more about political philosophy
https://brainly.com/question/11640194
#SPJ4
Deceased family member called in china
When a non-royal person passes away, they may be given the Buddhist posthumous name of kaimy, albeit in reality, people still refer to them by their living name.
What do you send the Chinese family when someone dies?Chinese culture and other Asian cultures place a lot of emphasis on color symbolism, and sympathy or funeral flowers are no exception. Since white flowers are associated with death and sadness, such as lilies and chrysanthemums, they are often appreciated. Yellow chrysanthemums are also appropriate.
What does the Chinese view as death?Death is awful. With the exception of a good death, which is described as passing away peacefully from an illness or old age with a happy life and no unsolved regrets (also known as a "good death" or "bai xi shi" or "white happy event" in English), dying in Chinese culture is usually seen unfavorably.
Learn more about Chinese culture: https://brainly.com/question/29414738
#SPJ1
How did trade with civilizations in Nubia and Southwest Asia help the ancient Egyptian civilization grow?
A. by protecting Egypt from invasion
B. by helping Egypt conquer other lands
C. by providing Egypt with resources that it lacked
D. by encouraging Egypt to explore and settle the deserts
PLEASE HELP!!!!
a) Briefly explain one major difference between Wilentz's and Hahns historical interpretations on manifest destiny
b)Briefly explain how one historical event or development in the period 1830 to 1860 that is not specifically mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Wilentzs interpretations.
c)Briefly explain how one historical event or development in the period 1830 to 1860 that is not specifically mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Hahns interpretations
Wilentz's interpretation of manifest destiny focuses on its role in sparking and driving the Civil War, viewing it as an expansionist, aggressive vision of American destiny that was also deeply rooted in a belief in white racial superiority.
In contrast, Hahn views manifest destiny as a more broadly-held vision of American progress, one that still saw the nation as an unquestioned beacon of progress and opportunity. He emphasizes the more positive aspects of manifest destiny, such as the idea that the nation could expand its boundaries while also expanding its own moral authority and potential.
One historical event or development in the period 1830 to 1860 that could be used to support Wilentz's interpretations is the rise of the Whig Party. The Whig Party was formed in the 1830s and was made up of a coalition of many different political and economic interests, including northern industrialists and southern plantation owners.
This coalition was able to work together to promote economic development in the United States, while also advocating for the protection of slavery in the South. This could be used to support Wilentz's interpretation that the rise of industrialization in the North and the protection of slavery in the South were both contributing factors to the growing sectional divide between the North and the South during the 1830 to 1860 period.
One possible historical event or development that could be used to support Hahns interpretation is the Trail of Tears. This event, which happened between 1830 and 1840, was the forced relocation of Native American tribes from their ancestral homelands in the southeastern United States to Indian Territory (modern-day Oklahoma).
This event was a result of the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which was a part of Andrew Jackson's policy of Indian removal. The Trail of Tears was a devastating event that resulted in the displacement of many Native American tribes, the loss of their ancestral homelands, and the deaths of thousands of Native Americans.
This event is a prime example of the oppressive and damaging policies of the federal government towards Native Americans during this period, and supports Hahns interpretation that the federal government's policies towards Native Americans were oppressive and damaging.
To know more about Wilentz, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/19718537
#SPJ4
What does the quote "In France, nine-tenths of the people die of hunger, one-tenth of indigestion" say about the differences between classes?
This quote highlights the stark differences between classes in France. It points to a stark contrast between those who have enough to eat, and those who don’t.
The majority of people in France are struggling to survive, while the minority are able to indulge in luxuries and live lives of relative comfort. This quote is a stark reminder that the disparities between classes are a real and present problem in France, with the majority of people struggling to get by while the minority enjoy a life of relative abundance.
It is a stark reminder of the need for social justice and economic redistribution in order to ensure that all people in France, regardless of their class, have access to the basic necessities of life.
To know more about France, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/7853285
#SPJ4
Which quote demonstrates Hamlet's use of direct address, thus diminishing the idea of feigned madness?
One quote that demonstrates Hamlet's use of direct address, thus diminishing the idea of feigned madness, is found in Act 3, Scene 4. In this scene, Hamlet speaks directly to his mother, Queen Gertrude:
"Look you, upon this picture, and on this,
The counterfeit presentment of two brothers.
See what a grace was seated on this brow;
Hyperion's curls; the front of Jove himself;
An eye like Mars, to threaten and command;
A station like the herald Mercury
New-lighted on a heaven-kissing hill;
A combination and a form indeed,
Where every god did seem to set his seal,
To give the world assurance of a man."
In this passage, Hamlet directly addresses his mother by comparing a portrait of his father to that of his uncle, King Claudius. This direct address and clear communication show that he is not fully lost in madness, and his lucidity diminishes the idea of feigned madness.
Learn more about Hamlet here :
https://brainly.com/question/3774380
#SPJ11
Consider people who believe that there are many ways to God
and/or that Jesus is not God the Son. List at least 5 arguments
that these types of individuals might make along with five proofs of
why these arguments are incorrect and your position is correct.
Your five proofs should contradict the arguments of people who
believe that there are many ways to God and/or that Jesus is not
God the Son. Submit a document with both sides of the argument.
Agnostic theists hold to the belief that there is a god or gods, but they do not know or are unable to know what the source of this belief is. The theist who is agnostic about gods may, conversely, also be agnostic about the characteristics of the deity or gods they worship.
Which three reasons do you think prove that God exists?The "big three" (or ontological, cosmological, and teleological) arguments of Kant have received a lot of attention in the debate.Five Arguments for the Existence of God According to Thomas AquinasMotion is the first strategy.The second approach is efficient cause.Possibility and need comprise the third approach.Grading represents the Fourth Way.Creating is the Fifth Way.For more information on Jesus kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/29758144
#SPJ1
Which of these MOST likely hurt the Federalist Party leading up to the election?
Responses
A George Washington had spoken out against political parties.George Washington had spoken out against political parties.
B Thomas Jefferson had switched from the Federalist to the Democratic-Republican Party.Thomas Jefferson had switched from the Federalist to the Democratic-Republican Party.
C John Adams had advocated the United States should assist France in their revolution.John Adams had advocated the United States should assist France in their revolution.
D The Federalists were associated with the Alien and Sedition Acts.The Federalists were associated with the Alien and Sedition Acts.
Which of these MOST likely hurt the Federalist Party leading - 1
Option (d), Prior to the election, the Federalist Party was most likely weakened by its association with the Alien and Sedition Acts.
What caused the Federalist party to suffer?The Sedition Act prosecutions and the Senate's use of its power to squelch dissent via contempt proceedings put the Federalists under a lot of strain. There was a reaction against the Federalists as a result of the legislation being repealed or allowed to expire.
Why, in your opinion, did the Federalists fail in 1800?The Alien and Sedition Acts, a package of laws that restricted freedoms of the press and expression as well as immigration rights, were passed in 1798 by the Federalist-controlled Congress. Democratic-Republicans fought these legislation vehemently because they thought they threatened civil liberties and did so because they were so divisive.
The Sedition and Alien Acts damaged the Federalist Party's credibility while also assisting Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans in gaining support from the general public.
Learn more about Alien and Sedition Acts: https://brainly.com/question/15420094
#SPJ1
Brainlist
• Define the foreign policies of TR, Taft & Wilson Provide specific examples of each president enacting their foreign policies • Draw a picture that will help you recall the policy of each president :4 Critical Thinking (3 sentences): Which president's foreign policy was the best? Why?
Answer:
Here are some brief descriptions of each president's foreign policy, along with specific examples of their actions:
Theodore Roosevelt: Roosevelt's foreign policy, known as the "Big Stick" policy, emphasized the use of military force to protect American interests and promote American power around the world. Roosevelt used this policy to expand American influence in Latin America and the Caribbean. In Panama, he supported a rebellion against Colombia in order to secure the rights to build the Panama Canal.
William Howard Taft: Taft's foreign policy, known as "dollar diplomacy," emphasized economic influence over military force. Taft believed that by investing in foreign countries, the United States could promote stability and protect its interests. He used this policy to expand American business interests in China and to encourage American investment in Latin America.
Woodrow Wilson: Wilson's foreign policy, known as "moral diplomacy," emphasized promoting American values such as democracy and human rights around the world. Wilson used this policy to support democratic revolutions in Latin America, such as in Mexico, where he intervened to protect American lives and promote democratic reforms.
Drawing to help recall each president's policy:
TR: A big stick (representing military force) with the words "Big Stick" written on it.
Taft: A dollar sign (representing economic influence) with the words "Dollar Diplomacy" written beside it.
Wilson: A heart (representing moral values) with the words "Moral Diplomacy" written inside it.
Wilson had the "best" foreign policy. Many historians credit Wilson's foreign policy with helping to establish the United States as a global leader and promoting American values around the world.
Explanation:
a sharpened bamboo stick hidden in holes in the ground by the Vietcong
Answer:
Punji sticks
Explanation:
How did the protests change during the 1960s?
Choose all answers that are correct.
• College students organized more silent, peaceful marches than they had in earlier years
•Women and Mexican Americans joined other groups to protest inequality
• Riots in major cities led to destruction and death.
All options are correct regarding the nonviolent protests change during the 1960s.
What was the 1960s student movement?Free speech on college campuses was a goal of the student movement when it first started, but as US involvement in the Vietnam War grew, that conflict became the main focus of student-led rallies.
What are the drawbacks of armed protests?Living, working, or going to school close to a violent protest can up your risk of developing depressive symptoms. Similarly, there is a higher risk of developing PTSD if you experience physical violence, witness violence, or are a victim of looting.
To know more about nonviolent visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/8931346
#SPJ1