The statement is true. The residuum rule means that no finding may be supported solely by hearsay evidence.
It emphasizes the importance of having reliable, non-hearsay evidence to substantiate a decision or conclusion.
Hearsay evidence is an out-of-court statement that is offered in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. It is generally considered less reliable than firsthand, direct evidence because it is based on the repetition of someone else's statement rather than personal knowledge or observation.
The residuum rule, also known as the "no evidence rule," requires that decisions or findings of fact in legal proceedings be supported by credible and non-hearsay evidence.
The residuum rule serves as a safeguard to ensure that legal decisions are based on reliable and credible evidence. It emphasizes the importance of direct evidence, which is evidence that is based on personal knowledge or observation, and requires that such evidence be used to substantiate any findings or conclusions.
The rule is based on the idea that hearsay evidence is less reliable and may be subject to inaccuracies or distortions as it passes from one person to another.
By requiring that decisions or findings of fact be supported by non-hearsay evidence, the residuum rule helps ensure that legal proceedings are fair and just.
It prevents decisions from being based solely on hearsay, which may be less reliable, and encourages the use of more direct and credible evidence to support legal conclusions.
This rule is commonly applied in legal systems in various jurisdictions to ensure the integrity and reliability of evidence used in legal proceedings.
To learn more about residuum, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/14502639
#SPJ11
If the violation is willful, the maximum penalty is (?) for each act.
The maximum penalty for a willful violation depends on the specific law or regulation that has been violated.
Different laws and regulations carry different penalties for willful violations. In some cases, the penalty may be a fine, while in other cases, it may include imprisonment or other legal consequences.
Under US federal law, willful violations of certain environmental regulations can result in fines of up to $50,000 per day of violation, while willful violations of certain occupational safety regulations can result in fines of up to $134,937 per violation.
It's important to consult the relevant law or regulation to determine the specific penalty for a willful violation.
For willful infractions of certain laws and regulations, different punishments apply. The punishment might range from a fine in certain circumstances to incarceration or other legal repercussions in others.
Federal law in the US allows for fines of up to $50,000 per day for willful violations of some environmental rules and up to $134,937 per violation for willful violations of several occupational safety standards.
To find out the precise punishment for a willful infringement, it's essential to examine the pertinent statute or regulation.
For similar questions on violation
https://brainly.com/question/13885689
#SPJ11
As opposed to elite and group theory, public choice theory focuses ona. individuals.b. large groups.c. voters.d. legislators.
As opposed to elite and group theory, public choice theory focuses on a. individuals.
Public choice theory emphasizes the actions and decisions of individuals in the political process, particularly in regards to their own self-interest and rational behavior. This is in contrast to elite and group theory, which suggest that a small group of elites or interest groups hold significant power and influence in shaping political outcomes. This approach considers individual preferences and behavior as the foundation for understanding decision-making in the political process.
Public choice theory also places emphasis on the role of voters and legislators, but ultimately sees their actions as being driven by individual incentives and preferences.
To know more about Public choice theory, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15205253
#SPJ11
The U.S. Constitution provides that no person shall be deprived of "life, liberty, or property without due process of law." Under this clause, "persons" include
a. humans and other "beings in nature"
b. American citizens only
c. corporations, businesses, and other "legal persons"
d. none of the above
Option A, B, and C are correct, "persons" under this clause include humans and other "beings in nature", American citizens, and legal persons such as corporations, businesses, and other entities recognized under the law.
According to the United States Constitution, no one shall be deprived of "life, liberty, or property without due process of law." Humans and other "beings in nature" are considered "persons" under this article, as are American citizens and legal persons such as corporations, businesses, and other entities recognised by law.
The Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause applies to the federal government, whereas the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause applies to the states. These provisions ensure that all individuals, whether citizens, noncitizens, or legal persons, have the right to due process before being deprived of their life, liberty, or property.
learn more about United States Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
_____ is the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it.
A.Unilateral intent
B.Bilateral intent
C.An offer
D.An acceptance
E.Consideration
An offer is the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it. An offer is a proposal made by the offeror to the offeree to enter into a legally binding agreement.
An offer represents the starting point in a contractual agreement, expressing the proposer's willingness to be bound by the terms of the proposed agreement should the other party accept. This willingness is the manifestation of the proposer's intent to create a legally enforceable contract.
In contrast, unilateral intent and bilateral intent refer to the nature of the obligations within a contract, rather than the initiation of the bargaining process. Once an offer is made, it is up to the offeree to decide whether to accept the offer, thus completing the bargain.
Acceptance indicates the offeree's agreement to be bound by the terms of the offer, creating a legally enforceable contract between the parties. Consideration is a separate element of a contract, referring to the value exchanged between the parties in the agreement, such as money, goods, or services.
Although it is a crucial component of a legally binding contract, it is not directly related to the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain as described in the question.
To know more about the willingness refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30834845#
#SPJ11
Option C is correct, An offer is the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it.
An offer, which conveys the offering party's wish to be bound by the terms of the bargained agreement should the other party accept it, is the first step in any contractual agreement. This readiness is an indication that the proposer wants to create a legally binding agreement. By accepting, the offeree agrees to be bound by the terms of the offer, creating a legal contract that can be enforced in court.
An offer is a proposal made by the offeror to the offeree to enter into a legally binding agreement. The value that the parties trade, like as money, goods, or services, is known as the consideration in a contract. the offeror's intention to be bound by the terms of the offer, should it be accepted by the other party, must be clearly manifested.
To learn more about the manifestation of willingness, click at:
https://brainly.com/question/14970972
#SPJ4
what is the most common traffic conviction for young CA drivers
The most common traffic conviction for young California drivers is speeding. According to the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), speeding is the most common traffic violation committed by drivers under the age of 21.
Young drivers, especially those who are new to driving, may be more likely to speed due to their inexperience, lack of judgment, or overconfidence.
Speeding is a serious traffic violation that can lead to accidents, injuries, and fatalities.
Other common traffic violations for young California drivers include reckless driving, driving under the influence (DUI), and distracted driving. These violations can also have serious consequences and can result in fines, license suspension, and even criminal charges.
It is important for young drivers to understand the rules of the road and to drive safely and responsibly to avoid traffic violations and accidents.
They should also be aware of the potential consequences of traffic violations and take steps to prevent them.
For similar questions on traffic
https://brainly.com/question/29529618
#SPJ11
The Center for American Progress and the Heritage Foundation often use ______ to promote a preferred policy.A. scientific policy analysis B. professional policy analysisC. political policy analysis D. program evaluation
Political policy analysis is a common tool used by the Heritage Foundation and the Centre for American Progress to advance a chosen policy. Here option C is the correct answer.
The Center for American Progress and the Heritage Foundation are both think tanks that aim to influence policy decisions in the United States. They use various methods to promote their preferred policy, but one of the most common is through policy analysis.
Policy analysis is the process of evaluating policy options and their potential impacts. It involves gathering and analyzing data, identifying the strengths and weaknesses of different policy options, and making recommendations based on the analysis.
In the case of the Center for American Progress and the Heritage Foundation, they often use political policy analysis to promote their preferred policy. Political policy analysis involves taking into account the political context in which the policy is being considered, including the political beliefs and values of key decision-makers, public opinion, and the political feasibility of different policy options.
To learn more about policy analysis
https://brainly.com/question/14094920
#SPJ4
the NIMS management characteristic of chain of command and unity of command means that
The NIMS management characteristic of chain of command and unity of command means that from the highest levels of the organization all the way down to the lowest there is a distinct and unbroken line of authority.
Everyone in the organization is aware of their immediate supervisor and who they report to thanks to the chain of command. Each employee in the company only reports to one direct supervisor. according to the concept of unity of command.
This system aids in making quick, effective decisions while ensuring that everyone is working toward the same goals and objectives. For efficient communication, coordination and decision making during emergencies, a clear chain of command and unity of command are essential.
Learn more about unity of command at:
brainly.com/question/30641469
#SPJ1
When parking in a handicap parking space, you can use another person's "special certificate" to park your vehicle as long as you are disabled. (T/F)
Answer:
Explanation:
False. Handicap parking spaces are reserved for individuals with disabilities who have a valid and current handicap parking permit or license plate. It is illegal to use another person's handicap parking permit or license plate, even if the person using it is also disabled. Each permit or plate is assigned to a specific person and cannot be transferred or used by anyone else. This is because misuse of handicap parking permits or license plates can prevent those who truly need them from accessing the designated parking spaces.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
CH.7 // The Fourth Amendment:A. applies only to criminal casesB. protects just those in criminal casesC. limits the right to search to the gathering and use of evidence in criminal casesD. includes searches which go beyond the needs of criminal law enforcement
The "4th-Amend-ment" of "US-Constitution" : (d) includes searches which go beyond needs of criminal-law enforcement.
The "4th-Amendment" of "US-Constitution" protect it's indi-viduals from 'un-reasonable-searches" and seizures by government. It applies to all individuals, regardless of whether they are involved in criminal cases or not.
The 4th Amendment sets limits on the power of the government to search and seize individuals, their homes, and their property. It applies to all searches and seizures by the government, not just those related to criminal cases.
This Amendment prohibits the un-reasonable searches and seizures, which includes searches and seizures that go beyond the needs of criminal law enforcement. This means that searches and seizures that are motivated by reasons other than law enforcement, such as harassment or punishment, are prohibited by the Fourth Amendment.
Therefore, the correct option is (d).
Learn more about Amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/28246295
#SPJ4
The given question is incomplete, the complete question is
The Fourth Amendment :
(a) applies only to criminal cases
(b) protects just those in criminal cases
(c) limits the right to search to the gathering and use of evidence in criminal cases
(d) includes searches which go beyond the needs of criminal law enforcement
When changing lanes you should always check your mirrors and look over your shoulder: (T/F)
The statement " When changing lanes, you should always check your mirrors and look over your shoulder" is true because it ensures that moving into the next lane is safe.
The correct answer is true.
Mirrors help provide a general idea of the traffic around you, but they may not show all potential hazards, such as a vehicle in your blind spot. Looking over your shoulder can help you identify any hazards that may not be visible in your mirrors. This is especially important when changing lanes, as you want to ensure that there are no other vehicles in your blind spot that could cause a collision.
It is essential to use all available tools to check for potential hazards when changing lanes, including mirrors and looking over your shoulder. Doing so can help ensure the safety of yourself and other drivers on the road.
To know more about mirrors, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1160148
#SPJ4
CH. 5 // stops differ from arrests in that:A. They always lead to a frisk or more invasive searchB. They produce written records of the police actionC. They occur in public places and are shorter in durationD. They are always shorter in duration
Stops differ from arrests in that they occur in public places and are shorter in duration.
Stops are temporary detentions where police officers detain and question a person briefly based on reasonable suspicion. Unlike arrests, stops do not require a warrant or probable cause. They also do not always lead to a frisk or more invasive search, and may not produce written records of the police action. Arrests, on the other hand, involve taking a person into custody based on probable cause and require a warrant or exigent circumstances.
Arrests also produce written records and may lead to searches and seizures of evidence.
To know more about Detention, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/26767950
#SPJ11
Which Act requires the EPA to regulate the discharge of pollutants into waterways?
The Clean Water Act (CWA) is a federal law that requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate the discharge of pollutants into waterways.
The CWA was originally passed by Congress in 1972, to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's waters. Under the CWA, the EPA is responsible for establishing water quality standards for all contaminants in surface waters and for regulating discharges of pollutants from point sources, such as factories and wastewater treatment plants. The EPA also works with states and tribes to develop and implement programs to protect and restore water quality.
The Clean Water Act has been amended several times since its original passage, with the most recent amendments occurring in 1987. These amendments added new provisions to address non-point source pollution, toxic pollutants, and wetlands protection, among other issues.
In summary, the Clean Water Act is the law that requires the EPA to regulate the discharge of pollutants into waterways, to protect and restore the quality of the nation's waters.
Know more about CWA here:
https://brainly.com/question/12682291
#SPJ11
Arkansas law makes it illegal to drive, or to be a front-seat passenger, without wearing safety belts? (T/F)
The given statement "Arkansas law makes it illegal to drive, or to be a front-seat passenger, without wearing safety belts" is true as Arkansas law requires drivers and front-seat passengers to wear safety belts while in motion.
According to Arkansas law, everyone in the front seats and the driver must buckle up when the car is moving. Additionally, when riding in a vehicle, all children under the age of 15 must be properly restrained in a child safety seat or booster seat.
Additionally, texting and emailing while operating a moving vehicle are illegal in Arkansas. It is allowed to make phone calls on a handheld device, but only when the driver is using a hands-free system. Fines and/or points on the driver's license may be assessed for violations of these laws.
Learn more about Arkansas law at:
brainly.com/question/31229577
#SPJ4
Possible dangers that responsible citizens could encounter when using social media to discourage dumping
when someone listens to public radio, but never contributes during pledge drives, that person would be considered:
The article claims that sociologists would label someone a "free rider" if they listened to public radio but never gave during pledge campaigns.
The term "achieved status" describes the social standing that a person has attained via hard effort, education, good fortune, and/or social advancement. Achieved status might alter during the course of a person's life. An illustration would be the prestige one acquires after they graduate from college and go on to become doctors.
A social movement is said to as regressive if it tries to stop social progress altogether or even just parts of it. An individual has learnt to assume the role of the particular or significant other when she is able to internalise the expectations of other distinct people.
Learn more about public radio Visit: brainly.com/question/30884727
#SPJ4
In 2010, Sara writes Terror at the Track, a novel about racecar driving. Sara does not register the work with the
appropriate government office. Under federal copyright law, Sara's work is protected
a. for ten years.
b. for twenty years.
c. for the life of the author plus seventy years.
d. forever.
Sara writes the racecar-related book Terror at the Track in 2010. Sara fails to file the necessary paperwork with the relevant government agency. Sara's work is safeguarded by federal copyright legislation for the duration of her life plus seventy years. Option C is correct.
Under federal copyright law, Sara's work is protected for the life of the author plus seventy years, regardless of whether she registers it with the appropriate government office or not. Copyright protection is automatic and begins as soon as a work is created in a fixed tangible form, such as writing it down or saving it to a computer file.
The duration of copyright protection has changed over time, but since 1978, works created by an individual are protected for the life of the author plus seventy years.
This means that Sara's novel, Terror at the Track, will be protected by copyright until seventy years after her death. During this time, no one else can reproduce, distribute, or create derivative works based on Sara's novel without her permission or without qualifying for an exception or limitation under the law.
To learn more about federal copyright law
https://brainly.com/question/30030383
#SPJ4
Under NOTS, you will lose your license if you earn ___ points in 12 months
Under the Negligent Operator Treatment System (NOTS), you will lose your license if you earn 4 points within a 12-month period.
The Negligent Operator Treatment System (NOTS) is a program implemented by the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to identify and monitor drivers who have exhibited negligent driving behavior. Under NOTS, if a driver earns four or more points within a 12-month period, they will be considered a negligent operator and may face license suspension or revocation. Additionally, if a driver earns six or more points within a 24-month period, they may also face license suspension or revocation.
To avoid accumulating points under NOTS, it is important to practice safe driving habits and obey traffic laws at all times.
To know more about Department of Motor Vehicles, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30328368
#SPJ11
how did nathaniel bacon gain the assembly's approval for his expedition?
Why must higher education pass rate be lowered to 30%
Answer:
I guess it depends on the goals of a university system.
If I am doing my math correctly, the set pass rate at my university when I started was around 29%. We were told that the bottom third would be flunked out each year. I do not remember the actual pass rate.
There is an advantage to that for university graduates, as a university degree now means more of an accomplihment, rather than that meaning somebody just hung around for four to six years.
There is a financial disadvantage to the college, in that those students who are being kicked out are no longer paying tuition and fees.
Explanation:
Answer:
If we scrap the 30% pass mark, our expectation of each Grade 12 learner is: Choose your NSC subjects wisely and get the best marks that you can in all your subjects. The higher your marks, the more opportunities for further study and work will open up for you. You can’t fail as there is no ‘pass mark’. Whatever marks you get, those marks are printed on your NSC certificate.
Hope it helped! :)
A ________________ opinion is NOT a type of opinion that can be issued by an appellate court.A. concurringB. majorityC. pluralityD. judgment
While appellate courts issue various types of opinions, a "judgment" is not considered a separate type of opinion. Here option D is the correct answer.
An appellate court is a court of law that hears appeals from lower courts or administrative agencies. When an appellate court reviews a case, it may issue an opinion, which is a written explanation of its decision. The opinion may be written by one judge or by a panel of judges who hear the case together.
Of the four options provided, a "judgment" is not a type of opinion that can be issued by an appellate court. A judgment is a final decision or ruling in a case, which may include an opinion explaining the reasoning behind the decision, but it is not considered a separate type of opinion.
On the other hand, the three other options listed are all types of opinions that appellate courts may issue. A "majority" opinion is the opinion of the majority of the judges on the panel who heard the case.
A "plurality" opinion is an opinion issued when no single opinion received the support of a majority of the judges, but a larger number of judges agreed with one opinion than any other. A "concurring" opinion is written by a judge who agrees with the outcome of the case but for different reasons than those stated in the majority opinion.
To learn more about appellate courts
https://brainly.com/question/30962544
#SPJ4
Courts protect citizens from other by handling civil cases. What type of cases do they not handle
Courts protect citizens from others by handling civil cases. the type of cases do they not handle Murder. option (A) is correct.
A common case is a debate between two residents where one individual sues another. It incorporates a portrayal of the occurrence, task of fault, and solicitation for a particular cure.
Murder is certainly not a common case. It is wrongdoing. Individuals blamed for homicide are attempted under criminal regulation. Criminal cases include an activity that is viewed as destructive to society overall (consequently, these are viewed as offenses against the "state" or the ward of the arraignment).
Therefore, option (A) is correct.
Learn more about court:
https://brainly.com/question/868155
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
Courts protect citizens from other by handling civil cases. What type of cases do they not handle
(A) Murder
(B) Divorce cases
(C) rent matters
(D) sale of land cases
In the most common form of city government, what functions as the executive branch?
In the most common form of city government, known as the council-manager form of government, the executive branch is composed of a mayor and a city manager.
The mayor is elected by the people and is responsible for representing the interests of the city and its citizens. The mayor is the political head of the city, presiding over city council meetings, representing the city at public events, and serving as a spokesperson for the city.
The city manager is chosen by the city council and is the city's chief executive officer. The city manager is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the city, including overseeing the city budget, managing departments and personnel, and implementing the policies of the city council.
The city manager is also responsible for ensuring that the municipality meets its legal and financial obligations. The city manager and mayor often work together to ensure that the city is functioning efficiently and effectively.
Know more about council-manager here
https://brainly.com/question/26965249#
#SPJ11
Which countries have not signed UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea) ?
Imagine that you have just been elected as a member of the legislative branch of the federal government. You are now charged with representing your state’s interests in Washington, DC. Brainstorm issues that are important to you and the people of your state. What legislation could you draft related to one of these important issues? What would you title your new bill? How would the passage of this bill make a difference to your state?
Answer:
To identify issues that are important to your state, you could conduct research on state-level statistics, public opinion polls, and news articles. Some issues that may be relevant to many states include:
Economic development: Creating jobs, supporting small businesses, and attracting investment.
Education: Improving access to quality education, reducing student debt, and supporting teachers.
Healthcare: Expanding access to affordable healthcare, reducing prescription drug costs, and addressing the opioid epidemic.
Infrastructure: Improving roads, bridges, and public transportation systems, as well as expanding broadband access.
Environment: Protecting natural resources, addressing climate change, and promoting clean energy.
Once you have identified an issue of particular importance to your state, you could draft legislation related to that issue. The title of the bill should be clear and descriptive of its purpose. For example, if you were drafting a bill related to improving access to healthcare, you could title it the "Affordable Healthcare Access Act." The bill could include provisions such as:
Expanding Medicaid coverage to low-income individuals and families.
Allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical companies.
Providing funding for clinics in rural and underserved areas.
Supporting research on new treatments and cures for diseases.
The passage of this bill could make a difference to your state by improving the health outcomes of its residents, reducing healthcare costs, and providing economic benefits to healthcare providers and other businesses. It could also help address broader national issues related to healthcare access and affordability.
Explanation:
True or False: Criminal justice is defined as the system of law enforcement, adjudication, and correction that is directly involved in the apprehension, prosecution, and control of those charged with criminal offenses.
True: Criminal justice is defined as the system of law enforcement, adjudication, and correction that is directly involved in the apprehension, prosecution, and control of those charged with criminal offenses.
Prosecutors are typically lawyers who possess a law degree, and are recognised as suitable legal professionals by the court in which they are acting. This may mean they have been admitted to the bar, or obtained a comparable qualification where available - such as solicitor advocates in England and Wales. They become involved in a criminal case once a suspect has been identified and charges need to be filed. They are employed by an office of the government, with safeguards in place to ensure such an office can successfully pursue the prosecution of government officials. Multiple offices exist in a single country, especially in those countries with federal governments where sovereignty has been bifurcated or devolved in some way.
Learn more about prosecution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29970118
#SPJ11
Making decisions according to the law of criminal procedure as outlined in the Constitution, judicial opinions, laws and other written sources is called:A. formal decision makingB. informal decision makingC. discretionary decision makingD. playing by the rules
Making decisions according to the law of criminal procedure as outlined in the Constitution, judicial opinions, laws and other written sources is called "Formal decision making". So, option A is the correct answer.
Formal decision making is a structured and rule-bound process of making decisions according to established legal requirements and procedures. In criminal justice, formal decision making ensures that the rights of defendants are protected, and that law enforcement officials and courts operate within the bounds of the law.
This involves following a set of predetermined steps to ensure that criminal defendants receive fair treatment and are not subject to arbitrary or discriminatory actions. In contrast, informal decision making may be based on personal biases, preferences, or informal rules, which can lead to inconsistent or unfair treatment of defendants.
Discretionary decision making allows for the exercise of judgment within the framework of established rules and procedures, but still requires adherence to legal requirements and safeguards.
Learn more about Constitution :
https://brainly.com/question/29775576
#SPJ4
As it concerns the unitary versus federal classification of states, which country has a uniquely in-between situation, with some unitary aspects and notable decentralization? A. Japan B. China C. North Korea D. Vietnam
The country that has a uniquely in-between situation with some unitary aspects and notable decentralization is Japan.
The country that has a uniquely in-between situation with some unitary aspects and notable decentralization is Japan. While Japan is officially classified as a unitary state, it has strong regional governments with significant power and autonomy. The federal system is not widely used in Japan, but the country's decentralized system is often considered to be a hybrid of unitary and federal structures.
Learn more about unitary here
https://brainly.com/question/3558587
#SPJ11
The country that has a uniquely in-between situation when it comes to the unitary versus federal classification of states is Vietnam. Option D
Vietnam has a unitary system of government, which means that the central government holds most of the power. However, Vietnam also has notable decentralization, which means that power is shared with regional governments.
In Vietnam, the Communist Party holds ultimate power, and the National Assembly serves as a legislative body. The country is divided into 58 provinces and five municipalities, with each province having its own People's Council and People's Committee. These bodies are responsible for local governance and decision-making, such as budgeting, infrastructure development, and social welfare programs.
Vietnam's system of decentralization has been a deliberate policy choice, as the country seeks to balance the need for centralized control with the benefits of local decision-making. This approach has helped Vietnam to achieve impressive economic growth in recent years, as local governments have been empowered to attract investment and develop their own economies.
Overall, Vietnam's system of governance is unique in its combination of unitary and decentralized elements, and serves as an interesting case study for other countries seeking to strike a balance between centralization and local autonomy. Therefore option D is correct.
For more such questions on federal visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28430584
#SPJ11
CH. 4 // The objective basis for stops and frisk is:A. The same as for arrestsB. Higher than for arrestsC. Lower than for arrestsD. The same as fourfull searches of a person
The objective basis for stops and frisk is lower than for arrests. This is because stops and frisks are based on "reasonable suspicion" rather than the "probable cause" required for arrests.
This means that law enforcement officers must have a reasonable suspicion that a person is involved in criminal activity in order to stop and frisk them, but the level of suspicion required is not as high as the probable cause required for an arrest. Stops and frisks are a means of briefly detaining a person for investigation, while full searches of a person require a higher level of suspicion or a warrant.
Thus, the correct answer is C.
To know more about Stops and frisks, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29617870
#SPJ11
According to the Knapp Commission on police corruption, the most common form of corruption is
According to the Knapp Commission on police corruption, the most common form of corruption is known as "gratuity," which involves officers accepting small gifts or favors in exchange for performing their duties.
This might include accepting free meals, discounted merchandise, or preferential treatment from businesses or individuals in exchange for providing protection or other forms of assistance.
Other forms of corruption identified by the Knapp Commission included bribery, which involves accepting payments in exchange for performing illegal or unethical actions, and "grass eating," which involves accepting small bribes or kickbacks for performing routine tasks or turning a blind eye to minor violations.
The Knapp Commission was a pioneering effort to investigate and address police corruption in New York City in the early 1970s. The commission was established in response to widespread allegations of corruption within the New York Police Department, and it ultimately led to significant reforms in the department and in law enforcement agencies across the country.
The findings of the Knapp Commission highlighted the need for increased oversight and accountability in law enforcement, as well as the importance of creating a culture of integrity and ethical conduct within police departments. Today, police departments across the United States have implemented a range of measures to prevent and address corruption, including increased training, enhanced background checks, and stronger internal affairs units.
Learn more about pioneering here:
https://brainly.com/question/22077576
#SPJ11
Which evidence is protected by the Fifth Amendment?A. WeaponsB. StatementsC. Appearance in a lineupD. Fingerprints
Answer:
The evidence protected by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution is statements made by an individual. This amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination and prohibits the government from compelling a person to provide testimony or statements that could be used against them in a criminal case. Therefore, individuals have the right to remain silent and not provide self-incriminating statements to law enforcement officials or in a court of law. The Fifth Amendment does not protect physical evidence such as weapons, fingerprints, or appearance in a lineup.
Explanation: