The perimeter of a square (perimeter = 4 times one side) is less than 16 inches. One side of the square measures x. what are the viable solutions for the value of x?

Answer:

25 tickets

Step-by-step explanation:

If the answer is wrong, I don't know what to say because the answer I got is 25

The would be 25 more gift card raffle ticket than shopping spree raffle tickets if there are 500 total raffle tickets

An equation is an expression that shows the relationship between two or more numbers and variables.

The shopping spree raffle tickets is 35% while the gift card tickets is 40%. Hence for 500 tickets:

Difference = (40% - 35%) * 500 = 25 tickets

The would be 25 more gift card raffle ticket than shopping spree raffle tickets if there are 500 total raffle tickets

Find out more on equation at: https://brainly.com/question/2972832

Answer: i think its 10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Using Pythagoras' identity in the right triangle

x² = 4² + ([tex]\sqrt{5}[/tex] )² = 16 + 5 = 21 ( take the square root of both sides )

x = [tex]\sqrt{21}[/tex] → B

Answer:

If the triangle is similar then their ratio is also same

x = 8

6 4.8

X =8×6

4.8

x = 10 cm

hope this helps

good day mate

Answer:

[tex]1\frac{3}{4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{10}{12} +\frac{11}{12} \\\\\frac{21}{12} \\\\1\frac{9}{12} \\\\1\frac{3}{4}[/tex]

a) The GCD of 27,720 and 58,212 is 1.

b) Integers r = 3 and s = -1 satisfy the equation 27720r + 58212s = GCD(27720, 58212).

(a) To find the greatest common divisor (GCD) of 27,720 and 58,212, we can use the Euclidean Algorithm.

Divide 58,212 by 27,720.

58,212 ÷ 27,720 = 2 remainder 2

Divide the previous divisor (27,720) by the remainder (2).

27,720 ÷ 2 = 13,860

Divide the previous remainder (2) by the new remainder (2).

2 ÷ 2 = 1

Since the remainder is now 1, the GCD is found.

Therefore,  the greatest common divisor (GCD) of 27,720 and 58,212 is 1.

(b) To find integers r and s such that 27720r + 58212s = GCD(27720, 58212), we can use the Extended Euclidean Algorithm.

Using the Euclidean Algorithm from part (a), we can backtrack to find the coefficients r and s:

2 = 27,720 - 13,860

Substituting the values:

2 = 27,720 - (58,212 - 2 * 27,720)

Simplifying:

2 = 3 * 27,720 - 58,212

Comparing with the form 27720r + 58212s = GCD(27720, 58212):

r = 3

s = -1

Therefore, we substitute r = 3 and s = -1 into the equation 27720r + 58212s, it will result in the greatest common divisor (GCD) of 27720 and 58212.

Learn more about  Euclidean Algorithm

brainly.com/question/32265260

#SPJ11

Answer:

a complementary angle adds up to 90 degrees.So 90 minus 64 and the measure of the other angle is 26

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helped ;)

3.14 x 11 = 34.54

Pi = 3.14 so times by 11 = 34.54

Answer:

A small box of the same cereal has 19 ounces and costs 4.19.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the first case, you have $3.37 per 15.3 ounces

Thus take 3.37 / 15.3 and you get $0.2203 per ounce or 22 cents per ounce

In the second case, you have $4.59 per 20 ounces

Thus take 4.59 / 20 and you get $0.2295 per ounce or almost 23 cents per ounce

So the smaller box actually has a slightly cheaper cost per ounce associated with it.

The statement |A ∪ B ∪ C| = |A| + |B| + |C| is true, which means the statement is proven.

Let A, B, and C be sets with finite cardinalities that satisfy A ∩ B ∩ C = ∅.

We have to prove that |A ∪ B ∪ C| = |A| + |B| + |C|.

The addition law of sets states that the cardinality of a union of two finite sets is equal to the sum of the cardinalities of the sets minus the cardinality of their intersection.

Thus, we get: |A ∪ B ∪ C| = |A ∪ B| + |C| − |(A ∩ B) ∪ C| = (|A| + |B| − |A ∩ B|) + |C| − |(A ∩ B) ∩ C| = |A| + |B| + |C| − |A ∩ B ∩ C|.Since A ∩ B ∩ C = ∅, we get |A ∪ B ∪ C| = |A| + |B| + |C|.

Thus, the statement is proven.

To learn more about sets

https://brainly.com/question/30096176

#SPJ11

Answer:

56 oz or 3 1/2 lbs

Step-by-step explanation:

1 1/4 + 1 1/2 = 2 3/4lbs = 44 oz

44 oz + 12 oz = 56 oz

Answer:

81/4

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer is not sure

(a) R4= 61.4626 and (b) L4= 61.4626.

In order to estimate the area under the graph of f(x) = 10 sqrt x from x = 0 to x = 4 using four approximating rectangles and right endpoints, we need to use the formula:

Rn = Δx [f(x1) + f(x2) + f(x3) + ... + f(xn)], where Δx is the width of each rectangle and f(xi) is the height of the rectangle at the right endpoint of the ith interval.

Step 1: Calculation of ∆x.∆x = (4 - 0)/4 = 1

Step 2: Calculation of xi for i = 1, 2, 3 and 4.x1 = 1, x2 = 2, x3 = 3, x4 = 4

Step 3: Calculation of f(xi) for i = 1, 2, 3 and 4.f(x1) = 10√(1) = 10f(x2) = 10√(2) ≈ 14.1421f(x3) = 10√(3) ≈ 17.3205f(x4) = 10√(4) = 20

Step 4: Calculation of R4.R4= ∆x [f(x1) + f(x2) + f(x3) + f(x4)]R4= 1[10 + 14.1421 + 17.3205 + 20]= 61.4626Area ≈ 61.4626 square units.

Step 5: Calculation of L4.Ln = ∆x [f(x0) + f(x1) + f(x2) + ... + f(xn-1)]

Where x0 is the initial value.

Here, we can find the value of L4 by using the left endpoints.

So, x0 = 0L4 = ∆x [f(x0) + f(x1) + f(x2) + f(x3)]L4 = 1 [f(0) + f(1) + f(2) + f(3)]L4 = 1 [10 + 14.1421 + 17.3205 + 20]L4 = 61.4626

Therefore, (a) R4= 61.4626 and (b) L4= 61.4626.

Know more about  rectangles here,

https://brainly.com/question/29123947

#SPJ11

The p-value (0.0208) is less than the significance level (0.05), we reject the null hypothesis. This indicates that there is sufficient evidence to suggest the case.

Null hypothesis (H0): The population means are equal, μ1 = μ2.

Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The population means are different, μ1 ≠ μ2.

Select the significance level (α): In this case, α = 0.05.

Now, The test statistic for a two-sample t-test is given by:

  t = (sample mean 1 - sample mean 2) / √((s1² / n1) + (s2² / n2))

  where s1 and s2 are the sample standard deviations, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes.

Here X₁ = 10, X₂ = 14, s= 3, n₁ =12, n₂ = 18

So, t= (10-14) / √(3²/12) + (3²/18) et:

t= (-4)/ √(3/4 + 1/2)

t= -4 / (5/4)

t= -2.7931

Now, degrees of freedom (df):

= (9/12 + 9/18)² / (((9/12)² / 11) + ((9/18)² / 17))

= 25.164

So, the p value will be 0.0208.

As, p-value is less than α (0.0208 < 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis.

Since the p-value (0.0208) is less than the significance level (0.05), we reject the null hypothesis. This indicates that there is sufficient evidence to suggest the case.

Learn more about Hypothesis test here:

https://brainly.com/question/17099835

#SPJ4

If we fail to reject the null hypothesis, we cannot conclude that the means are significantly different.

To check whether the means of the samples from different states are significantly different or if the difference is just by chance, we can use the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

The premise is that the ANOVA assumption of normality and homogeneity of variance has been satisfied.

Here, the null hypothesis is that the means of all the samples are equal while the alternative hypothesis is that at least one mean is different.

The significance level is 5%.

To perform the ANOVA test, we can follow these steps:

Step 1: State the null and alternative hypotheses

H0: μ1 = μ2 = μ3 = ... = μk (where k is the number of groups)

Ha: At least one mean is different

Step 2: Set the significance level (α)α = 0.05

Step 3: Calculate the test statistic

The test statistic used in ANOVA is the F-statistic, which is the ratio of the between-group variance to the within-group variance.

If the F-statistic is large and the p-value is less than the significance level, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that at least one mean is different. If the F-statistic is small and the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the means are not significantly different.

Step 4: Calculate the p-value

Using the F-statistic and the degrees of freedom for the between-group and within-group variance, we can calculate the p-value. If the p-value is less than the significance level, we can reject the null hypothesis. If the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step 5: State the conclusion

Based on the p-value, we can either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. If we reject the null hypothesis, we can conclude that at least one mean is different. If we fail to reject the null hypothesis, we cannot conclude that the means are significantly different.

To learn more about ANOVA

https://brainly.com/question/15084465

#SPJ11

This is the answer

I hope if you get it correct or right

Good luck everyone

The total vertical change from the start of the ride for the roller coaster after the 20 seconds 76 m.

The rise is the vertical difference between two points called vertical change.

Thus, the total vertical rise will be,

100 (upward) - 72 (downward) = 28(upward)

So, the total rise will become,

28(upward) + 48(upward) = 76(upward)

Therefore, the total vertical rise of the roller is 76 meter during the time of 20 seconds.

To know more about the vertical line test, here

https://brainly.com/question/2257047

#SPJ2

Answer:

171

Step-by-step explanation:

6x6x4.75 is 171

Answer:

Top:(4r⁹+3r³-5)

Bottom: r⁵

Step-by-step explanation:

To find a primitive root modulo a given integer, we can use Corollary 5.15 and Proposition 5.17. For (a) 7, a common primitive root r can be found by using these results. Similarly, for (b) 11m, (c) 13m, and (d) 17m, the same approach can be applied to find primitive roots modulo each integer.

(a) To find a primitive root modulo 7 and 72, we can use Corollary 5.15, which states that if r is a primitive root modulo n, then r is also a primitive root modulo any power of n. Since 7 is a prime number, we can easily find a primitive root modulo 7. Let's say r is a primitive root modulo 7. Using Proposition 5.17, which guarantees that a primitive root modulo a prime number remains a primitive root modulo any positive integral power of the prime, we can conclude that r is a primitive root modulo 7 for all positive integral m.

(b) Similarly, for 11m, we can find a primitive root modulo 11 and use Proposition 5.17 to prove that it is a primitive root modulo 11m for all positive integral m.

(c) The same approach can be applied to find a primitive root modulo 13m.

(d) Finally, for 17m, we can find a primitive root modulo 17 and use Proposition 5.17 to prove its primitiveness modulo 17m for all positive integral m.

By using Corollary 5.15 and Proposition 5.17, we can find a common primitive root for all the given integers modulo their corresponding powers.

Learn more about integral here: https://brainly.com/question/31059545

#SPJ11

Answer:

829.2 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

To find how far they traveled in total, add together all of the distances:

417 + 45.3 + 366.9

= 829.2

So, all together, they traveled 829.2 miles

Answer:

32

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer to this question is $14,916

Step-by-step explanation:

18,469 - 3,553 = 14916

As he already has money for the car.

A bar model is shown in the linked picture.

y = -2/5 x + 22/5 is the required equation of the line passing the coordinates

The equation of a line in slope intercept form is expressed as y = mx +b

where;

m is the slope

b is the y-intercept

Given the coordinate points (-4, 6) and (6, 2), the slope of the line is expressed as:

Slope = 2-6/6+4

Slope = -4/10
Slope = -2/5

For the y-intercept

2 = -2/5(6) + b

2 + 12/5 = b
b = 22/5

Hence the equation of the line passing the coordinate is y = -2/5 x + 22/5

Learn more on equation of a line here: https://brainly.com/question/18831322

#SPJ1

Answer:

heres the answer I think

Step-by-step explanation:

-3 < x < 1/2

Answer:

The answer is 21 units²

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the area of a right triangle you use the formula A=ab/2

So

A=6×7/2 = 21

Answer:

24 IN.

Sorry for all caps

Step-by-step explanation: