Answer:
The Bureau of Justice Statistics
Explanation:
The Bureau of Justice Statistics' National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) is an annual data collection carried out by the U.S. Census Bureau.
The Senate allows its members more freedom to debate policy issues than the House. In some cases, Senators talk for hours in hopes of influencing a bill or blocking its passage. This is called a ______.
Disability income insurance claims payments must be made at least once every (?) days until the insurer's obligation to pay claims has ended.
Disability income insurance claims payments must be made at least once every 30 days until the insurer's obligation to pay claims has ended.
In the event that an injury or sickness prevents a person from working and earning a regular income, disability income insurance can help shield them from financial losses. Both short-term and long-term disability insurance is offered by employers, Social Security, or insurance firms. When you are unable to work, disability insurance replaces a portion of your income. Disability insurance can assist in covering necessary costs such as food, utilities, school tuition, a mortgage, and auto payments if you were unable to work as a result of an illness or injury.
The amount of time between an injury and the receipt of benefit payments is known as the "elimination period" in the insurance industry. To put it another way, it refers to the period of time between the onset of an illness or accident and the receipt of benefit payments from insurance. The elimination period begins on the day that your illness or injury prevents you from working. The elimination period would start the day of the accident, for instance, if you were involved in a car accident that prevented you from working and you submitted a claim 30 days later.
To learn more about Disability income insurance, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28154584
#SPJ11
Consider how much tech you touch in your lives—not just at home, but at school, work, shopping. In the United States, the e-waste volume amounts to about 42 pounds per person annually, and while e-waste is only about 2 percent of waste, it represents more than two-thirds of discarded toxic, heavy metals. This "effluent of the affluent" will only increase with the rise of living standards worldwide.
The quick answer would be to recycle this stuff. Not only does e-waste contain mainstream recyclable materials we're all familiar with, like plastics and aluminum, it also contains small bits of increasingly valuable metals such as silver, platinum, and copper. In fact, a ton of discarded smartphones contains more than 100 times the amount of gold than is found in a ton of ore. Done right, recycling produces far less CO2 emissions and other pollution than mining, and it's 13x cheaper to extract precious and rare earth metals from discarded electronics than it is to mine it from the earth.
Technology has become a significant part of our daily lives, and as a result, we are generating an immense amount of electronic waste (e-waste).
The e-waste volume in the United States alone amounts to approximately 42 pounds per person annually. It is essential to understand that e-waste is not only about 2% of waste, but it also represents more than two-thirds of discarded toxic, heavy metals. The disposal of such waste is detrimental to our environment and health. Therefore, the solution to this problem is to recycle this e-waste.
Recycling e-waste has numerous benefits. It contains mainstream recyclable materials such as plastics and aluminum, as well as small bits of valuable metals like silver, platinum, and copper. Recycling this waste is a sustainable way to extract precious and rare earth metals.
A ton of discarded smartphones contains more than 100 times the amount of gold than is found in a ton of ore. Recycling produces far fewer CO2 emissions and other pollutants than mining, and it is 13 times cheaper to extract precious and rare earth metals from discarded electronics than it is to mine them from the earth.
In conclusion, it is imperative to recycle e-waste. We must ensure that we dispose of our electronic devices in a manner that is both environmentally friendly and socially responsible.
By doing so, we can reduce the amount of toxic waste that is released into the environment, conserve valuable resources, and reduce the impact of mining on our planet. As individuals, we can play a significant role in reducing the amount of e-waste generated by our society by recycling our electronic devices properly.
For more such questions on Technology visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30929035
#SPJ11
21. Owen, in uwen, in Pennsylvania, and Quonset Structures, Inc. in Maryland agree to have their dispute resona arbitration according to the law of Virginia. This is a ground for a court to a. do nothing. b. review the merits of the dispute. c. review the sufficiency of the evidence. d. set aside the award
Owen, in uwen, in Pennsylvania, and Quonset Structures, Inc. in Maryland agree to have their dispute resona arbitration according to the law of Virginia. This is a ground for a court to " review the merits of the dispute." So, option (b) is correct.
Owen and Quonset Structures, Inc.'s agreement to have their dispute resolved through arbitration according to the law of Virginia is a valid agreement that would be upheld by the court.
Therefore, the court would not have grounds to do anything or review the merits of the dispute, sufficiency of the evidence, or set aside the award unless there was some defect or issue with the arbitration process or award that violated a statutory or common law rule.
In general, courts are deferential to parties' agreements to resolve their disputes through arbitration and will only intervene if there is evidence of fraud, corruption, or some other misconduct in the arbitration process or if the arbitration award violates public policy.
Learn more about Pennsylvania :
https://brainly.com/question/30024072
#SPJ4
The judicial test that places the burden of proof on government to show that a race-based policy serves a compelling government interest and is narrowly tailored to address identifiable past discrimination is called
The judicial test you are referring to is called strict scrutiny.
Strict scrutiny is the highest level of scrutiny applied by courts when reviewing the constitutionality of government actions or policies, particularly those involving race-based classifications. This test places the burden of proof on the government to demonstrate that a race-based policy serves a compelling government interest and is narrowly tailored to address identifiable past discrimination.
Strict scrutiny is applied to ensure that the government does not infringe upon the constitutional rights of individuals, specifically the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees that all citizens receive equal protection under the law. To pass the strict scrutiny test, the government must first establish that the policy in question is aimed at promoting a compelling interest. This typically involves addressing a history of racial discrimination or promoting diversity.
In summary, strict scrutiny is a rigorous judicial test that requires the government to justify race-based policies by demonstrating that they serve a compelling interest and are narrowly tailored to address past discrimination. This test is essential to preserving the principle of equal protection under the law for all citizens.
Know more about strict scrutiny here:
https://brainly.com/question/29793578
#SPJ11
Why would having a plural executive weaken and destroy responsibility?
A plural executive refers to a system of government in which executive power is divided among multiple individuals or offices. This system is in contrast to a unitary executive, in which all executive power is vested in a single individual or office.
One of the main criticisms of a plural executive system is that it can weaken and destroy responsibility. This is because responsibility is diffused among multiple individuals, making it difficult to hold any one person accountable for actions or decisions made by the executive branch.
In a plural executive system, it can be challenging to determine who is responsible for a particular decision or action, leading to a lack of accountability. Additionally, because power is divided among multiple individuals or offices, there may be disagreements or conflicts over decision-making, which can further impede responsible governance.
Overall, while a plural executive system may offer some benefits, such as increased checks and balances, it also comes with the potential risk of weakened and destroyed responsibility, which can undermine effective governance.
To learn more about plural executive
https://brainly.com/question/5039460
#SPJ4
To prevail in an action for innocent misrepresentation, the plaintiff must prove a. The misrepresentation was in writing. b. The misrepresentation concerned material facts. c. The defendant made the false statements with a reckless disregard for the truth. d. Reliance on the misrepresentations was the only factor inducing the plaintiff to enter into the contract.
To prevail in an action for innocent misrepresentation, the plaintiff must prove that the misrepresentation concerned material facts (option b).
This means that the false statement made by the defendant had a significant impact on the plaintiff's decision to enter into the contract.
The plaintiff needs to establish that they relied on the misrepresentation and that it was a crucial factor in inducing them to enter the contract.
It is not necessary for the misrepresentation to be in writing (option a), or for the defendant to have made the false statements with a reckless disregard for the truth (option c).
The focus is on the materiality of the misrepresented facts and the reliance of the plaintiff on those facts.
To know more about innocent misrepresentation refer here: https://brainly.com/question/28347351#
#SPJ11
When there are no signs or lane markings to control turning, a driver should:
When there are no signs or lane markings to control turning, a driver should follow the basic traffic rules.
When there are no road markings or signs to regulate turning, a driver should abide by the essential traffic laws and make turns safely and legally. Before making a turn, the driver must check for approaching traffic, pedestrians, and bicyclists and give way to any other cars or pedestrians who are already in the intersection or crosswalk.
It is significant to keep in mind that, occasionally, local laws or ordinances may outline requirements for turning at particular intersections or locations, even when there are no signs or lane markings present. In these situations, drivers must abide by any applicable regulations or instructions.
Learn more about traffic rules at:
brainly.com/question/28879065
#SPJ4
Question 3In preparing a legal action, one of the first steps a sanitarian should do is toChoose one answer. a. obtain a warrant b. obtain a court order c. keep very accurate records d. check with other agencies
B. Obtain a court order is the correct option. When preparing a legal action, a sanitarian should first obtain a court order, which authorizes them to take action against a property or individual that is in violation of health regulations.
This allows them to take necessary steps to protect public health and safety, such as issuing fines, closing down a facility, or ordering corrective action to be taken. Keeping accurate records and checking with other agencies may also be important steps in the process. In preparing a legal action, one of the first steps a sanitarian should do is to keep very accurate records. This is essential for building a strong case and ensuring that all necessary information is available for potential court proceedings or obtaining a court order.
To know more about legal actions refer :
brainly.com/question/23534715
#SPJ11
In the context of the four foundations on which laws are based around the world, civil or code law:
A. comes from the Marxist socialist system.
B. is derived from Roman law.
C. is the foundation of the legal system in the United States.
D. continues to influence regulations in former communist countries.
The context of the four foundations on which laws are based around the world, civil or code law is derived from Roman law. Therefore the correct option is option B.
A legal system based on written legal codes and derived from the Roman law is known as civil or code law. It is one of the most important legal systems in the world.
The use of written legal rules that are arranged into comprehensive legal systems characterizes civil law regimes.
The American legal system, which is founded on common law, is not also based on the civil law.
Therefore the correct option is option B.
For such more question on law
https://brainly.com/question/9722764
#SPJ11
True or False: Substantive due process refers to the citizen's right to be protected from criminal laws that may be biased, discriminatory, or unfair
False. Substantive due process refers to the right of citizens to be adequately protected from governmental actions that can be considered arbitrary, oppressive, or an abuse of power.
This protection is provided through the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and is meant to ensure that the government does not interfere with an individual’s fundamental rights. Substantive due process does not refer to protection from criminal laws that may be biased, discriminatory, or unfair.
That is a separate concept known as procedural due process which ensures that individuals receive fair and equal treatment when facing potential punishment for a crime.
Substantive due process provides more general protection from government interference, while procedural due process is more specific in protecting citizens from unfair and biased criminal laws.
Know more about criminal laws here
https://brainly.com/question/12588225#
#SPJ11
A driver should never drive on the shoulder of any street or road, unless directed by a police officer: (T/F)
The statement "a driver should never drive on the shoulder of any street or road unless directed by a police officer" is true because driving on the shoulder of a road can be dangerous and is often prohibited by law.
The correct answer is true.
The shoulder of a road is intended for emergency use only, such as for disabled vehicles, emergency vehicles, or pedestrians. Driving on the shoulder can create hazards for other drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists and can also cause damage to the road surface.
However, there may be certain circumstances where a police officer may direct a driver to use the shoulder of the road, such as during a traffic stop or to allow emergency vehicles to pass. In such cases, it is essential to follow the directions of the police officer and use caution when driving on the shoulder of the road.
To know more about police officer, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28535644
#SPJ4
The underlying ideological debate in the early 1800s over federal public works bills like that referenced in the above excerpt is essentially the same as that concerning which of the following issues at the beginning of the twentieth century in america? multiple choice question. a) Reinstituting silver as part of the basis for the dollar
b) Dependency of the economy on the railroads c) Regulation of monopoly and large trusts
The fundamental ideological conflict surrounding federal public works bills in the early 1800s, such as the one mentioned in the excerpt above, was very similar to the one surrounding the following issues at the start of the 20th century in America. Option a is Correct.
The senator or representative who sponsors the measure may introduce it in any body of Congress. A bill is given to a committee when it is introduced, and the committee's members will study, debate, and alter the measure. The chamber is then presented with the measure for a vote.
Resolutions can be divided into five categories: celebratory, simple, concurrent, memorial, and joint. Option a is Correct.
Learn more about ideological Visit: brainly.com/question/1470181
#SPJ4
if a person got adopted by the same person who another person got adopted and disowned by get married, is that incest? like the person only got adopted after the other person already had been disowned. Nobody shares blood.
So it would be legal by law, correct?
Legally speaking, if there is no blood relationship between the two people, then it would not be considered incest in most jurisdictions. However, there may be social or cultural taboos surrounding the situation that could make it a controversial or sensitive topic.
Why it would be legal by law?From a biological perspective, there is no genetic relationship between the two individuals since they do not share any blood ties. Therefore, there would not be any biological reason to consider their relationship as incestuous.
From a legal perspective, the legality of their marriage would depend on the laws of the country or state where they reside. In most places, the law prohibits marriage between close blood relatives, but the definition of "close blood relatives" may vary. In some places, the law considers adoptive siblings as close relatives, while in others, they are not.
However, it is important to note that there may still be social or cultural taboos associated with such a relationship, and some people may still view it as inappropriate or morally wrong.
Learn more about law here:https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
The rationale for due process is based on the idea that admitting unreliable evidence denies defendants the right to their life. This is referred to as the __________ rationale.A. states rightsB. reliabilityC. Forced confessionsD. Miranda
This is referred to as the reliability rationale. There are numerous justifications put out for the judiciary's ability to exclude evidence that was obtained illegally.
The correct answer is option B.
Almost all types of the three legal systems whose stated goal is to uphold trial fairness for examination. It examines the fundamental assumptions and restrictions of applying the fair trial justification.
The judge presiding over a criminal trial typically has the authority to dismiss evidence that is collected illegally or in another improper manner.
Different justifications for exclusion have been embraced by legal systems, resulting in variances in the exclusionary power's reach.
The correct answer is option B.
To know more about due process of law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11591373
#SPJ4
Name of Republican Congressional Campaign Committees
There are two main Republican Congressional Campaign Committees in the United States: the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) and the Republican National Committee (RNC).
The NRCC is the campaign arm of the House Republicans, responsible for supporting and promoting Republican candidates for the United States House of Representatives. The committee was founded in 1866 and works to help elect Republican candidates through fundraising, training, and other campaign support activities.
The RNC is the main organization of the Republican Party, responsible for promoting the party's platform and candidates at the national level. The committee works to support Republican candidates for all federal offices, including the presidency, the House of Representatives, and the Senate. The RNC is also responsible for organizing the Republican National Convention, which is held every four years to nominate the party's candidate for president.
Both the NRCC and the RNC play important roles in shaping the Republican Party's electoral strategy and promoting Republican candidates at the national level. Their activities and fundraising efforts are closely watched by political analysts and observers during each election cycle.
To learn more about RNC
https://brainly.com/question/13831082
#SPJ4
21 Mary, who is charged with a crime, claims that Nick, a government agent, entrapped her. For entrapment to be a valid defensea. Mary must not have been predisposed to commit the crime. b, Nick must have pressured Mary into committing the crime. c. Nick must have suggested that the crime be committed. d. all of the above.
For entrapment to be a valid defense, Mary must not have been predisposed to commit the crime, Nick must must have pressured Mary into committing the crime, and suggested the crime be committed.
The correct answer is option D.
The entrapment defence is used when an accused person alleges that a law enforcement officer inspired, incited, persuaded and lured him to commit a crime. Discussed are the various policy reasons for the development of the defence.
The courts have proposed two methods for implementing the defence. The majority approach would allow the jury to decide if the accused had been entrapped when the facts are in dispute and have the court decide without a jury in a clear case.
The minority view would always want the court, never the jury, to distribute the issue.
The correct answer is option D.
To know more about the defenses, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1449242
#SPJ4
Dr. Grampa is working hard on his research testing a drug which will influence the onset of a newly identified psychological disorder. Dr. Grampa most likely got his idea from
Dr. Grampa is working hard on his research testing a drug which will influence the onset of a newly identified psychological disorder. Dr. Grampa most likely got his idea from Scientific literature.
Where did Dr. Grampa get the idea ?Dr. Grampa may have come across research papers or articles discussing the newly identified psychological disorder in question, and the potential for pharmacological interventions to treat or prevent it. This could have inspired him to investigate whether such an intervention might be possible.
Dr. Grampa may have attended a scientific conference or seminar where the newly identified psychological disorder was discussed, and learned about the potential for drug interventions to treat or prevent it. This could have sparked his interest in pursuing research in this area.
Find out more on Scientific literature at https://brainly.com/question/26287218
#SPJ1
Based on the concept of research analysis, and the question described in this case, it is concluded that Dr. Grampa most likely got his idea from the functional problem.
What is a functional problem?Functional problem is a term that is used to describe the assertions proposed as a thesis in which the answer to the proposed query is not of a simple interrogative polar question, which implies that the research question goes beyond a yes or no as answer.
Generally, the term functional problem involves the computational complexity theory, whereby the functional problem assists the researcher to discover interrogatives of a complex type.
In this case, given that the research involves the testing of a drug and not just a simple interrogative polar question, the idea of the research must have arisen from the functional problem.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is the Functional Problem.
Learn more about the Functional Problem here: https://brainly.com/question/13949244
#SPJ1
Alan, the president of Bayside Investments, Inc., and Colin, Bayside's accountant, are charged with a crime after the police search Bayside's office/ Under exclusionary rule:
A) Certain Bayside records are excluded from subpoena.
B) Certain parties to a criminal action may be excluded from a trial.
C) Illegal obtained evidence must be excluded from a trial.
D) Persons who have biases that would prevent them from fairly deciding the case may be excluded from the jury.
Alan, the president of Bayside Investments, Inc., and Colin, Bayside's accountant, are charged with a crime after the police search Bayside's office/ Under exclusionary rule Illegal obtained evidence must be excluded from a trial. The correct option is C.
A criminal trial must not be allowed to use evidence that was obtained unlawfully, according to the exclusionary rule. The U.S. Supreme Court established this rule in order to prevent police misconduct and ensure that criminal defendants' rights will be protected.
Evidence obtained not only during a search but also during an interrogation or any other law enforcement procedure that infringes on a suspect's rights is subject to the exclusionary rule. As a result, in the scenario outlined, any evidence obtained unlawfully during the police search of Bayside's office would be disregarded at Alan and Colin's trial. The correct option is C.
Learn more about criminal trial at:
brainly.com/question/31290446
#SPJ4
States demonstrate a wide variety of policy capacities. This refers to the fact that ______.
Compare and contrast the major aspects of Crime Scene Technology discussed.
By carefully examining the crime scene, investigators find physical evidence that helps them determine what happened and who was responsible.
Employees at the crime scene and the case investigator work together to identify and secure potential evidence-containing sites, investigate and document the scene, collect physical evidence, preserve, package, and deliver the evidence to the lab for processing at the crime scene.
Using these crucial pieces of evidence, the investigator might try to piece together the details of the crime. The likelihood that the crime scene staff will get it correct increases with the level of thoroughness of their job.
Thus, By carefully examining the crime scene, investigators find physical evidence.
For more information about evidence, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15880833
#SPJ1
A criminal has just been convicted of vehicular manslaughter and cocaine possession. She has a previous DUI conviction from two years ago. She is also the sole provider for her two children, ages 4 and 6, but has had difficulty maintaining a job for more than a few months at a time in the past five years.
Determine which sentencing goal or philosophy you would use in this case.
Why is the goal or philosophy you chose the best approach?
Explain your sentence choice.
On what factors should judges rely when sentencing offenders? How does discretion come into play with sentencing?
The best approach would depend on the circumstances of the case, the offender's background, and the specific goals of the justice system. In some cases, a combination of these goals may be appropriate.
What are sentencing goalThere are several sentencing goals and philosophies, including retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation.
Retribution aims to punish offenders proportionally to the harm they caused, deterrence aims to discourage others from committing similar offenses, rehabilitation aims to reform offenders and prevent future crimes, and incapacitation aims to remove dangerous offenders from society.
Factors that judges may rely on when sentencing offenders include the severity of the offense, the offender's criminal history, the impact of the offense on victims and society, the offender's remorse and willingness to accept responsibility, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
Discretion plays a significant role in the sentencing process. Judges have the discretion to consider all relevant factors and to choose an appropriate sentence within the legal guidelines. This discretion allows judges to tailor sentences to fit the specific circumstances of each case and to balance competing goals, such as punishment and rehabilitation.
Learn more about philosophy at
https://brainly.com/question/9949
#SPJ1
The Fed BUYS securities using Open Market Operations. What will this do to the money supply?
no change likely
increase it
decrease it
If the Fed buys securities using Open Market Operations, this will B. Increase money supply.
What are Open Market Operations?Open Market Operations (OMO) is a frequently employed instrument utilized by the Federal Reserve (the Fed) to modify money circulation.
Through buying securities, such as Treasury bills or government bonds, from banks, the Fed elevates their reserves. Subsequently, this augmentation heightens the provision of finance available to businesses and consumers, allowing more funds to enter the economy, thus enlarging its monetary supply.
Find out more on Open Market Operations at https://brainly.com/question/14256204
#SPJ1
Britney, an employee of Computer Associates, is arrested at work. A grand jury issues a formal charge against Britneyfor fraud. This is
a. an arraignment. b. an indictment. c. an information. d. an inquisition.
Britney, an employee of Computer Associates, is arrested at work. A grand jury issues a formal charge against Britney for fraud. This is b. an indictment.
An indictment is a formal accusation or charge made against an individual by a grand jury after examining evidence presented by a prosecutor. In this scenario, Britney, an employee of Computer Associates, is arrested at work and subsequently charged with fraud by a grand jury.
The grand jury would have reviewed the evidence presented by a prosecutor and determined that there was sufficient cause to formally charge Britney with the crime of fraud. It is important to note that an indictment is not the same as an arraignment, which is a formal reading of the charges against the accused in court, nor is it the same as information, which is a formal accusation made by a prosecutor without the need for a grand jury.
In conclusion, the correct term to describe the formal charge against Britney for fraud would be an indictment. It is an important step in the legal process that follows an arrest and signals that the case will proceed to trial unless a plea deal is reached. Therefore the correct option is B
Know more about crime of fraud here:
https://brainly.com/question/30614298
#SPJ11
29. Phil invents "PhutureNow," new Web site design software, and applies for a patent. If Phil is granted a patent, his invention will be protected a. for ten years. b. for twenty years.c. for the life of the inventor plus seventy years. d. forever
The new Web site design program "PhutureNow," created by Phil, is patented. If Phil's idea gets given a patent, it will always be safe. Here option D is the correct answer.
If Phil is granted a patent for his invention, the protection it provides will not last forever, but rather for a limited period of time. In the United States, patents are governed by federal law, specifically the Patent Act, and are issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
Under current law, the term of a utility patent, which is what Phil would likely apply for, is twenty years from the date of filing. This means that if Phil's patent is granted, he will have exclusive rights to his invention for twenty years, during which time he can prevent others from making, using, or selling the invention without his permission. After the patent expires, the invention will become part of the public domain and can be used by anyone.
It is important to note that patents are not granted automatically or guaranteed. Phil will need to demonstrate that his invention meets the criteria for patentability, including novelty, non-obviousness, and usefulness. Additionally, there are various fees and requirements associated with the patent application process.
To learn more about Web site design
https://brainly.com/question/13176098
#SPJ4
Why did the federal government pass legislation to regulate human resource decisions?
The federal government passed legislation to regulate human resource decisions because there were concerns about discriminatory practices in hiring, promotion, and other employment practices.
Public administration-specific human resource management refers to human resource management as it relates to that field. It is regarded as an internal structure that guarantees objectivity, upholds moral principles, and fosters a value-based system.
The legislation was aimed at ensuring that all individuals are treated fairly and equitably in the workplace, regardless of their race, gender, age, religion, or other protected characteristics. Additionally, the legislation was intended to promote diversity and inclusion in the workplace and to prevent employers from engaging in unfair labor practices or exploiting their employees. By regulating human resource decisions, the federal government aims to protect the rights and interests of workers and to promote a more just and equitable society.
To learn more about Human Resource Management, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/23428372
#SPJ11
Elle buys a new textbook for $100 and a used car for $5,000, and signs a one-year lease for an apartment for $1,000 monthly rent to start at the beginning of the next month. The Statute of Fraud covers:
a. the apartment lease, and the textbook and car purchases
b. the apartment lease and the car purchase only
c. the apartment lease only
d. the textbook and car purchase only
The statue of fraud covers the apartment lease only if Elle buys a new textbook for $100 and a used car for $5,000, and signs a one-year lease for an apartment for $1,000 monthly rent to start at the beginning of the next month.
Hence, the correct option is c.
The Statute of Frauds is a law that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing in order to be legally enforceable. In this case, the statute of frauds would apply to the lease agreement for the apartment, but not to the purchase of the textbook or the used car.
The lease agreement for the apartment is a contract that involves the transfer of an interest in real property (the right to use the apartment) for a term of more than one year, and as such, is required to be in writing under the Statute of Frauds. The purchase of the textbook and the used car, on the other hand, do not involve an interest in real property and are not subject to the Statute of Frauds.
Hence, the correct option is c.
To know more about apartment lease here
https://brainly.com/question/17184728
#SPJ4
Dirk, an employee of Ergonomic Elevators, Inc., pays Ferbie, an employee of Ergonomics' competitor G-Force Risers Company, for a secret G-Force pricing schedule. This is
a. an effective marketing strategy.
b. commercial bribery.
c. creative legal bookkeeping.
d. money laundering.
This act of Dirk is commercial bribery. Giving a commission or gratuity to an agent or employee of the buyer without the buyer's knowledge or agreement in order to influence them to promote the seller's goods is known as commercial bribery.
The correct option is B.
Commercial bribery is the act of providing something of value, whether directly or indirectly, to an agent, representative, middleman, or employee of another company without that company's knowledge or consent in order to sway that person's decision regarding that company's operations.
Bribing agents and staff to influence sales is long considered as unethical and deceptive. Sixteen States have laws making commercial bribery a criminal offense.
The correct option is B.
To know more about commercial bribery, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14995674
#SPJ4
According to the Supreme Court, in order to conduct a routine search at the border, officers need:A. probable causeB. a warrant C. reasonable suspicion D. no probable cause, reasonable suspicion, or a warrant
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
Question 25 In Ed's suit against First National Bank, the discovery phase would include all of the following except a. Ed's complaint b. Ed's deposition c. Ed's requests for First National's admissions. d. First National's replies to Ed's written interrogatories.
In Ed's suit against First National Bank, the discovery phase would include all of the following except option A- Ed's complaint.
During the discovery phase of a litigation, each party can acquire evidence and information from the other party or parties. The goal of discovery is for the parties to obtain evidence and information in order to prepare for trial and avoid surprises during the trial.
Depositions, written interrogatories, petitions for admission, and requests for production of papers or other tangible evidence are common techniques of gathering information during the discovery phase.
As a result, Ed's deposition, demands for admissions from First National, and responses to Ed's written interrogatories would all be part of the discovery phase.
learn more about litigation here:
https://brainly.com/question/15284945
#SPJ4