Select the correct answer.
Why did Congress commission the formation of the Revenue Cutter Service in 1790?
O A.
to overwhelm rebels
to curb the frequent occurrence of smuggling after the US Navy was disbanded
OB.
O C.
to aid in increasing fisheries
D.
to provide a mode of transport
Answer:
It's B, To curb the frequent occurrence of smuggling after the US Navy was disbanded
Makeup with a synopsis of a criminal act. I
Answer:
ok i dont understand
Explanation:
this is weird
I need help.... please help me.
Can law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Cos they have been bestowed with the power by the Government of their country and also they have enough financial fund and weapons to be able to combat crime
Yes the law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own because they have been given authority by the government of their nation, as well as sufficient resources and weapons to fight crime.
What is a law enforcement agency?A law enforcement agency (LEA) is any government organization tasked with upholding the law. It is referred to as operating inside a jurisdiction when LEAs have some kind of restriction on how they can use their authority. By allowing the exchange of information required for law enforcement between LEAs inside those countries, LEAs that operate across a number of countries, such as Europol, tend to support law enforcement efforts rather than actively enforcing laws. An international law enforcement agency, like Interpol, has authority over and/or conducts operations across national borders in several different countries. A multinational law enforcement agency is one that employs people from various nations but normally only operates in one nation or region of a nation.
To learn more about law enforcement agencies, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14328441
#SPJ2
how many lawyers actually work hard on their clients' cases if they are doing public defense?
probably a few because some of them fight very hard and win alot of cases in a good or bad situation.
Match the career options with their associated responsibilities.
signals intelligence or electronic warfare officer
intelligence analyst
cryptologic linguist
military intelligence systems maintainer or integrator
primarily responsible for identifying foreign communications
using signals equipment
gathering military information and using the findings to
develop suggestions on the most efficient strategic and tactical
course of action
testing and repairing communications equipment, as well as
accessing data from fixed, portable, and wireless
storage/communication devices
gathering valuable electronic information regarding
adversaries, reporting that information to the commander,
and providing an assessment of the information
Answer:
PLATO
Explanation:
In mid-January of 2010, France, following Germany’s example, issued a bulletin to all French computer users through Certa, a French government agency charged with protecting against cyber threats. The bulletin advised that the current and all versions of Internet Explorer had a serious security flaw making them vulnerable to hackers. Further, the bulletin recommended that computer users switch to a different browser as soon as possible. The bulletin followed a Microsoft admission the previous week that its browser was the weak link that allowed hackers to open the e-mail accounts of human rights activists in China. Could Microsoft be held liable for invasions of the privacy of its users as a consequence? Why or why not?
The SABC implements a "no
work no pay rule". The CFO takes the decision to withhold payments
to the medical aid, pension fund and housing allowances. Discuss if this conduct amounts to an unfair
labour practice.
Motivate your answer referring to relevant case law and authority.
Answer:
work no pay rule. The CFO takes the decision to withhold payments.
Need help with this question please
1. The federal government creates the laws that govern the entire nation. Compare
the role each branch of government plays in this process and explain which branch
plays the most important role in creating laws. (3 points)
what are the correctional facilities in the Philippines and give example of Non-institutional Corrections
Answer:
Programs such as diversion, restitution, probation, parole, pardon, and various provisions for temporary release from prison or jail are included in the Community Based Corrections being implemented by the corrections pillar of our criminal justice system.
Explanation:
In general, the national prisons housed more serious offenders, and those serving short-term sentences were held in local facilities. The prison system at the national level was supervised by the Bureau of Prisons of the Department of Justice. The government maintained six correctional institutions and penal farms.
Administrative law consists of the rules, orders, and decisions of the president. true or false
Answer: True
Explanation: Administrative law- Consists of the rules, orders, and decisions of administrative agencies. Dominant element in the regulatory environment of business.Administrative agency- A federal, state, or local government agency established to perform a specific function.Federal Agencies-At the national level, the cabinet departments of the executive branch include numerous executive agencies. Food and drug administration is an example is an agency within the US department of Health and Human services, theseexecutive agencies are subject to the authority of the president, who has the power to appoint and remove their officers.
Giao tiếp sư phạm đạt hiệu quả, người giáo viên cần lưu ý gì
Answer:
bus what languages not able to understand jio to Baramma that he looked another jio your Venum Kan Lulu gi
Which of the following duties can be abrogated by the broker?
As advanced technology becomes more and more common, what procedures might police need to develop for interacting with smart homes? that me
You look amazing. : )
There's no such thing as a ___ call.
A) fun
B) easy
C) routine
D) hot
Answer:
fun
Explanation:
Because a there is no such thing as a fun call and it doesn't exist,I have never heard someone talking about a fun call.
What is TRUE about the presence of gunpowder residue on a person?
O A. Every person who fires a gun will have visible gunpowder on their hands.
OB. The residue is most likely to be found on the palm area of a shooter's hand.
OC. Even if someone fires a gun, it can be tough to find gunpowder on them.
D. Residue stays on a shooter's hands for hours after they have fired a gun.
Answer:A gunshot victim's clothing should be preserved, as a GSR distribution pattern can assist in distance determinations. The clothing must be carefully removed, not folded, and allowed to dry. Clothing from both victim and potential shooters should be seized as it may contain GSR, blood spatter, glass fragments, other forms of trace or transfer evidence, or tears, damage, or soil patterns that may be useful for reconstruction purposes. The presence of trace evidence or damage to the clothing may be used to corroborate a statement regarding movement or events during and after the shooting incident. Documentation of possible GSR (and other evidence) on clothing is best accomplished at the crime scene before packaging. oc.
Explanation:
The event that is TRUE about the presence of gunpowder residue on a person is Every person who fires a gun will have visible gunpowder on their hands. Thus the correct option is A.
What is Gunpowder's Significance?Gunpowder has had a variety of uses, such as those related to explosives, fireworks, weapons, and armaments. The development of gunpowder is a significant historical development since it altered military tactics and brought about political and cultural transformation in Europe.
If someone has gunshot residue on their hands, it means they will either have recently shot a gun, handled a gun or something with trace evidence on it, or were nearby when the gun was fired.
Therefore, option A Every person who fires a gun will have visible gunpowder on their hands is appropriate.
learn more about Gunpowder, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13909238
#SPJ2
2.2 How can the involvement of community structures contribute towards solving burglaries in the area? (10)
Here, Community structures refers to an uniformed & authorized way of buildings layout, road routes, railroad etc, which follows the community plan.
In other word, the structures refers to the internal structure of an area, town, city etc.Community structures brings about the organization and arrangement of our society.When community plan takes in consideration Act of Burglary, then, the introduction of Police-Check point at every Street will be paramount.
In conclusion, the involvement of this plan is important in solving burglaries problems because its instills Fear of security and thus discourage attempted burglary from occupant of the community.
Read more on this here
brainly.com/question/24447737
No one component of Capitalism is any more or less important than the other.
True
False
Answer:
true................
Choose the response that best defines gross income.
All worldwide income realized in any form, from whatever source derived, unless specifically excluded by law.
Financial gain derived from labor or capital, less any deductions or adjustments.
Income less allowable reductions.
Specific income items identified and classified as taxable income.
Answer:
Specific income items identified and classified as taxable income.
Explanation:
Which of the following answers is NOT an argument used by supporters of the death penalty?
The death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment.”
The death penalty supports the religious and social values of our country.
The death penalty acts as a deterrent for those who contemplate committing serious crimes.
The death penalty is “morally correct.”
The death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment." is not an argument used by death penalty supporters.
What is an Argument?An argument refers to exchange of views or series of statements or words which are use in order to determine the degree of truth of another statement, conclusion or views.
It is normally a diverging statements.
Therefore, The death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment." is not an argument used by death penalty supporters because it does not support their views and interest.
Learn more about Argument from the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/509558
LUPE was in the grocery store and was having trouble controlling her wild 4-year-old son MIGUELITO. She told him twice to settle down, and “no” he could not have Fruit Loops. MIGUELITO kept whining and kicking his feet in the cart and throwing a tantrum, as well as throwing the box of Cheerios on the ground. Finally, LUPE had enough, and slapped MIGUELITO across the face, then pointed her finger at him and said to him, “Be quiet!” MIGUELITO continued his tantrum, and LUPE slapped him again. Finally, MIGUELITO acted like a good boy.
Instructions: Evaluate LUPE’s legal liability for this corporal punishment of MIGUELITO. Use an essay format, and separate your response into three numbered paragraphs - one for each of the following questions.
1. Provide the facts that would prove her liability for child abuse (guilty)
- Minimum 100-word response
2. Provide the facts defending her actions as having the right of parental discipline (not guilty).
- Minimum 100-word response
3. How would you decide this case? Make an argument for either guilty or not guilty using the applicable law to support your facts. Explain your reasoning.
- Minimum 300-word response
Nonaccidental physical injuries children suffer at the hands of their parents occur along a continuum that ranges from mild to severe. At the outer edges of this continuum, one might find, on the one hand, a slight swat to the buttocks, and on the other, a brutal beating. In the United States, the normative consensus appears to be that outsiders to the family are appropriately concerned only when the physical injury at issue causes serious harm; any injury short of a serious one is exclusively “family business.”Consistent with this consensus, all states’ laws permit the use of “reasonable” corporal punishment; simultaneously, they all prohibit non accidentally inflicted serious injury. The latter is generally denominated abuse, although some states classify milder but still impermissible injuries as neglect, or simply “inappropriate discipline.” Thus, being able to distinguish between reasonable corporal punishment and maltreatment—whether this is formally denominated abuse or neglect—is critical for the relevant actors: parents who use corporal punishment as a disciplinary tool, child protective services (CPS) staff who are required by statute to intervene in the family to protect children subject to or at risk of abuse, and courts adjudicating issues arising in connection with these cases. The integrity of the distinction and of the methodology employed to make it is also critical for a society that is prominently committed to both family autonomy and child welfare, and in particular to protecting the integrity of the family when it promotes (or at least does not harm) child welfare, and to intervening in the family when it fails in its related obligations.Unfortunately, few if any states have sufficiently defined the relevant terms “reasonable corporal punishment” or “maltreatment” (abuse or neglect) to consistently guide the relevant actors (those in a single system) in their exercises of discretion; nor have they established a coherent methodology for sorting injuries along the continuum of nonaccidental physical injuries. That administrative regulations and policies promulgated by state and local CPS departments often narrow agency discretion helps CPS itself to be more consistent and may help families know what to expect when they are dealing with CPS. But because appellate courts do not appear to give much deference to agency interpretations of the statutory definitions, these regulations and policies do little to guide the courts’ own exercise of discretion. Moreover, to the extent that the law in statutes and judicial opinions is either less precise or even different from the law as it is applied by CPS, the public and parents are inevitably confused or misled. As a result, decisionmaking about whether an injury or incident remains in the realm of family business or has crossed the line into the impermissible varies, reflecting a multiplicity of purely personal viewpoints, religious and political ideologies, and academic or disciplinary training and requirements. In turn, institutional treatment of and outcomes for children and families are often inconsistent. The status quo has been defended or at least explained on several grounds. The vagueness of abuse definitions has been consistently upheld on policy grounds—specifically on the argument that it is important for authorities to retain flexibility to call injuries as they see them given that, particularly in a diverse society, abuse might appear in unexpected forms.
Imagine Joe calls the police from his smart phone to report a crime he could see from his house. While he’s on the phone with the dispatcher, he seems suspicious, leaving out certain details and refusing to give any information about himself or how to contact him. However, the 911 dispatcher can track his phone’s location automatically, and the police arrived at his door without a warrant. They just plan to talk to him, and try to persuade him to give more information on his own.
Joe has already locked his front door and fled the scene, specifically to avoid speaking with the officers. However, the artificial intelligence that controls Joe’s smart house knows Joe recently called 911, and it is programmed to assist emergency responders in case the residents of the house need to be rescued. So, when the police arrive at his door to take his statement, the A.I. opens the door to let them inside. Once the door opens, the police see drugs, drug paraphernalia, and guns.
Given that the police did not have a search warrant, and Joe did not open the door, will those items be admissible as evidence? Explain your reasoning.
How should smart homes be programmed to respond to these types of situations? Should safety or privacy be more important?
As advanced technology becomes more and more common, what procedures might police need to develop for interacting with smart homes?
If the police had no warrant saying they could go in or search Joe's house then the police could be in a certain amount of trouble as well seeing as Joe did not willingly let them in and they never had a warrant but Joe could be in a lot more trouble for being in the possession of drugs.
And smart homes should be more advanced to these kinds of things because they could have been fake cops, plus they had no warrant which leaves everyone in this situation at fault especially Joe for being in the possession of drugs and the possible false 911 call influenced on drugs either making him see things or think things, maybe even both.
Given that the police did not have a search warrant, and Joe did not open the door, those items to be inadmissible as evidence.
As advanced technology becomes more and more common, police might need to develop for interacting with smart homes where police agency of the future may have automated dispatchers answering 9-1-1 calls, autonomous police cars, artificial intelligence (AI) robots on patrol, biometric monitoring for officer health and safety, and smartphone applications to interact with smart city technology software systems to process and file data.
Which evidences are admissible?Thus, the admissibility of evidence means any document, testimony, or tangible evidence used in a Court of Law. All evidence is not allowed in the Court, only those evidence which is reliable and relevant are admitted in the Court of Law.
What evidence is not admissible?Generally, irrelevant evidence, unfairly prejudicial evidence, character evidence, evidence protected by privilege, and, among others, hearsay evidence is inadmissible.
How AI can help the police?With the dawn of artificial intelligence (AI), a slew of new machine learning tools promise to help protect us quickly and precisely tracking those who may commit a crime before it happens through data.
To learn more about inadmissible evidence and artificial intelligence (AI) refer
https://brainly.com/question/15713422
#SPJ2
Explain imprisonment, from a legal and ethical perspective, when providing support to people with disabilities.
Explanation:
just wanted a quick email to restaurant for dinner on Sunday night for a few minutes of zeros to use patterns and a few more
Critical infrastructure such as utilities and banking are which partners responsibility?A. Federal governmentB. State governmentC. Local governmentD. Private sector
Answer:B
Explanation:
Critical infrastructure such as utilities and banking is responsibility of State government. Thus option (B) is correct.
What is government?A government is the political system by which a country or community is administered and regulated. The most of the key words commonly used to describe governments are monarchy, oligarchy, and democracy.
A government is a system of order for a nation, state, or another political unit. A government is responsible for creating and enforcing the rules of a society, defense, foreign affairs, the economy, and public services.
While the responsibilities of all governments are similar, those duties are executed in different ways depending on the form of government.
Some of the different types of government include a direct democracy, a representative democracy, socialism, communism, a monarchy, an oligarchy, and an autocracy.
Critical infrastructure such as utilities and banking is responsibility of State government. Therefore, option (B) is correct.
Learn more about government here:
brainly.com/question/17166802
#SPJ6
help me please to answer this
Which of the following are formulas used by judges to impose criminal sentences?
Truth-in-sentencing
Sentencing guidelines
Determinant sentencing
Mandatory sentencing
The sentencing guideline is a formula that is used by judges to impose criminal sentences.
The sentencing guidelines helps in the court of law by giving a structure at the stage where the offence of the person is being defined and other elements are being considered in the act that was committed.
In simple terms, the sentencing guideline is a non binding guideline that serves by giving information regarding sentences in the law court.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/15152861?referrer=searchResults
Criminal law spells out the rights and duties that exist between individuals. true or false
Answer:
false
Explanation:
because it's a way of making wrong things which will lead to prison
Do you believe it is fair that the US Supreme Court limits the cases they can hear based on how many people the verdict would impact? Can you think of another way we could structure the US Supreme Court to allow the justices to hear more cases? Explain.
Answer:
As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution. The Supreme Court is "distinctly American in concept and function," as Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes observed.
Explanation:
I think it is fair that the US Supreme Court restricts the cases it can hear depending on how many people the judgment would touch, as there are some circumstances where it would only affect a very small group of people and it would be more just to uphold the lower court's ruling in those situations.
The Supreme Court may hear an unlimited number of cases, which would be one way to arrange it. The Court serves as both a protector and an interpreter of the Constitution since it is the ultimate arbitrator of law and is responsible for assuring that the American people get the promise of equal justice under the law.
According to Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, the Supreme Court is "distinctly American in concept and function."
Learn more about the US Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/3585397
#SPJ3
Critics often point out that disproportionate rates of violent crime and victimization tend to be higher in African-American communities. Offer three structural factors that might explain this trend (by “structural” reasons we mean reasons outside the individual that might help explain personal motivations to commit crime). How is this related to the Black Lives Matter Movement?
Three structural factors that explain the high rates of violence and victimization against African Americans are injustice, racism, and discrimination.
Afro-American communities are all those communities made up of American descendants of Africans brought to America during the colony.
These communities have been affected over the years because since their arrival they were treated as objects and slaves and the situation was culturally perpetuated in the social imaginary despite the struggles for civil rights and the rights granted to them.
Racism is one of the structural causal factors of violence against African Americans. This type of discrimination makes people with other skin colors feel superior to African Americans and have the right to mistreat or attack them for this reason.Discrimination goes beyond racism. The Afro-descendant community has to deal with all kinds of discrimination due to their social status, their beliefs, their cultural customs, their way of speaking, expressing themselves, and dressing, among others.Despite the recognition of hundreds of rights for the Afro-descendant community, on many occasions, violence against the Afro-descendant community does not have the same impact as in other similar cases. This differentiated treatment causes the community to have a feeling of injustice towards their condition and unequal treatment.These factors are related to the case of George Floyd because the police brutality of which he was a victim was unjustified by imageries such as racism and discrimination in the individual who killed him. In addition, the case had worldwide visibility due to the ineffectiveness of the judicial system once the murder occurred.
Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/1001373