Based on the provided information, Firm B can continue to work on Fisher v Baker as proper screening of Sonya, apportion no part of the fee to Sonya, and give notice and updates to Fisher. (Option A)
According to the practice of ethical screening in law, if a lawyer who is disqualified from representing a client joins a new firm, the new firm may be disqualified as well unless the lawyer is properly screened. Ethical screens refer to a system of safeguards and procedures that law firms employ in an attempt to prevent the imputation of a conflict of interest from one or more lawyers or nonlawyers to the rest of the law firm. Hence, proper screening implies that disqualified lawyers refrain from working on the specific case, do not discuss it with those who do, and do not have any access to case files. Furthermore, the disqualified lawyer does not receive a share of the fees from the matter, and the former client is given notice. Alternatively, the former client can give informed consent, confirmed in writing, but in the given case Fisher has refused to give consent.
Learn more about Conflict of interest:
https://brainly.com/question/21648646
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements about the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are true, if any?
The true statements about the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is that its eliminates lifetime limits on total health care insurance payments by insurers. The Option E is correct.
What is the Affordable Care Act?In U.S., the Affordable Care Act is a reform signed into law by President Barack Obama in March 2010 which includes a list of health care policies intended to expand access to health insurance to millions of uninsured Americans.
The reform legislation expanded the Medicaid eligibility, created a health insurance exchanges, mandated that Americans purchase of health insurance and prohibited insurance companies from denying coverage due to pre-existing conditions.
Missing options "The ACA decides the insurance payments for dependents. The ACA limits the total number of surgeries for the insurers. The ACA provides major medical insurance with low deductibles to protect against catastrophic illnesses. The ACA requires employers to reimburse the cost of hospital stay of the insured. The ACA eliminates lifetime limits on total health care insurance payments by insurers.
Read more about Affordable Care Act
brainly.com/question/26495011
#SPJ1
which of the following does the ftc funeral rule not prohibit you from doing? question 121 options: embalming for a fee without permission requiring the purchase of a casket for direct cremation requiring consumers to buy certain funeral goods and services as a condition for furnishing other funeral goods or services listing options such as direct cremation with memorial service on the gpl
Embalming for a fee without permission requiring the purchase of a casket for direct cremation requires consumers to buy certain funeral goods and services as a condition for furnishing other funeral goods or services listing options such as direct cremation with memorial service on the GPL.
The Funeral Rule, enacted by the Federal Trade Commission on April 30, 1984, and amended effective 1994, was designed to shield customers by requiring that they receive adequate info regarding the products and repairs they will purchase from a ceremonial provider.
All funeral suppliers should go with The ceremonial Rule. The ceremonial Rule defines such terms as, among others, funeral provider, funeral goods, and funeral services and specifies varied client rights, also as specific parameters within which funeral business goods and service providers must respect consumer rights and conduct their business. The ceremonial Rule defines clearly many funeral varieties to reduce the possibility of miscommunication or misunderstanding between the ceremonial service supplier and customer.
Learn more about cremation here: https://brainly.com/question/11368008
#SPJ4
which of the following is the best example of a constitutional concept that supports the vision of the united states as a union of states, rather than a union of individual citizens? responses supremacy clause supremacy clause judicial review judicial review the electoral college the electoral college separation of powers
The best example of a constitutional concept that supports the vision of the united states as a union of states, rather than a union of individual citizens is the electoral college.
The Electoral College is a method, not a physical location. It was established in the Constitution by the Founding Fathers as a compromise between electing the President through a vote in Congress and electing the President through a popular vote of qualified citizens.
'How does the procedure work?'
The Electoral College process consists of the electors being chosen, meeting to vote for President and Vice President, and the electoral votes being counted by Congress.
know more about constitution here
https://brainly.com/question/29799909#
#SPJ4
Answer: THE ANSWER IS A) preserve the Union of states under control of the federal government.
Explanation: I GOT A 100 ON THE 35 QUESTION TEST
police officers received an uncorroborated and anonymous tip that a farmer was growing marijuana on his property. the police went out to the farm, and finding no one home, went around the back, and followed a path that led out to the adjacent fields where cattle and horses were grazing. at the farthest edge of the property there were about two dozen marijuana plants. the plants were obscured by a high hedge fence, but the officers walked through the hedges and found the plants.
Police officers walked through the dense hedge and discovered the plants, which were hidden by it. The plants were in open areas, thus the farmer had no Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy there.
The main issue here is whether the invasion into the garden that was hidden by shrubs was protected by the Fourth Amendment, despite hints and irrelevant circumstances like the police having no probable cause and peering into the farmer's home.
The location is comparable to an open field, and society does not respect privacy rights in such situations, hence the answer is no.
Regardless of fences, no-trespassing signs (or regulations), the landowner's efforts to keep people out or wants to maintain the privacy, or any other irrational expectation of seclusion. The Fourth Amendment does not apply to areas that are outside of the home's boundaries.
Complete question:
Police officers received an uncorroborated and anonymous tip that a farmer was growing marijuana on his secluded property at the edge of the county line. The police went out to the farm, and finding no one home, looked into the windows of the house, went around the back, and followed a path that led out to the adjacent fields where cattle and horses were grazing. At the farthermost point on the property, about one quarter of a mile from the house, there were about two dozen marijuana plants. The plants were obscured by a high hedge fence, but the officers walked through the hedges and found the plants.
Which of the following statements is the most accurate and appropriate?
(a) The farmer has no Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in the plants because they were contraband.
(b) The farmer has no Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in the plants because they were located in open fields.
(c) The farmer has no Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in the plants because they could readily be observed by aircraft or a helicopter flying at very low altitudes.
(d) Whatever Fourth Amendment expectation the farmer has in the plants, the police had adequate reasonable suspicion to look around the property.
(e) The farmer has a Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in the plants because they fell within an area known as the curtilage.
To learn more about Police officers
https://brainly.com/question/28535644
#SPJ4
The basic speed law in California says that no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility and traffic conditions.
true
The basic speed law in California says that no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility and traffic conditions. - TRUE.
According to California's "Basic Speed Law," you are never allowed to drive faster than is safe under the circumstances. No of the posted limit, your speed should be determined by: the quantity and speed of other moving vehicles. Whether the road is wide or narrow, wet or dry, smooth or rough, graveled, etc.
25 mph in residential and commercial areas. When kids are outside of a school within 500 to 1000 feet, the speed limit is 25 mph. 55 mph on two-lane, undivided highways 65 mph on the majority of Californian highways.
For more info about 'Basic Speed Law' click on below link - https://brainly.com/question/28271654
#SPJ4
the state supreme court has appellate jurisdiction. which situation is an example of a case they might hear?
The state supreme court has Appellate jurisdiction. The best illustration is, a politician is charged with stealing finances from a department in the executive branch.
Jurisdiction is the legal term for the legal authority granted to a legal reality to legislate justice. Appellate jurisdiction includes the power to reverse or modify the lower court's decision.
Appellate governance exists for both civil law and criminal law. In an appellate case, the party that appealed the lower court's decision is called the appellate, and the other party is the user.
The Supreme Court has also a genuinely wide appellate governance over all Courts and Bars in India is as important as it may, in its discretion, entitlement special leave to appeal under Composition 136 of the Constitution from any judgment, decree, determination, judgment, or order in any cause or matter passed or made by any Court.
To know more about Appellate jurisdiction,
brainly.com/question/1250183
brainly.com/question/29562739
#SPJ4
a women needs to take some time off from work to care for her ill mother. which of the following health policies allows her to take an extended leave from work to care for a family member?
The Family and Medical Leave Act provides job protection leave to certain workers when they need time off from work due to a serious health condition.
she may leave from work also take up to 12 workweeks in a 12 month period to care for her ill mother who has serious health condition. which is generally involves a period of incapacity. it means an individual is unable to work, attend school, doing regular daily activities because of the serious health condition, due to treatment or for recovery from condition.
she could eligible to take up if:
has worked for her employer for at least 12 monthshas at least 1250 hours of service with employer during the 12 months before starting her leaveworking at location where the employer has at least 50 employees within 75 miles.Learn more about leave from work at: https://brainly.com/question/1425386
#SPJ4
a temporary drivers license is an acceptable form of client identification for bank product purposes
No, a temporary drivers license is not an acceptable form of client identification for bank product purposes.
What is a bank?
A bank is a financial institution that is licensed to accept checking and savings deposits and make loans.
Banks also provide related services such as individual retirement accounts (IRAs), certificates of deposit (CDs), currency exchange, and safe deposit boxes.
There are several types of banks including retail banks, commercial or corporate banks, and investment bank
They provide a safe place for consumers and business owners to stow their cash and a source of loans for personal purchases and business ventures.
Learn more about a bank here:
https://brainly.com/question/29797792
#SPJ1
Why do you think the requirement are different for memberhip in each of the two houe of Congre?
The Senate and the House of Representatives are each a separate chamber of Congress. Typically, the top and lower chambers are referred to as the House and the Senate, respectively.
Why do the two houses of Congress have different representations?Members of the House represent particular districts, whereas senators represent their entire states. The population of a state determines how many districts it has. There is a minimum of one representative from each state in Congress. As institutions, the House and the Senate have developed very differently.
Why are the numbers of members in each House different?The two senators that each state sends to the U.S. Senate serve as its representatives. However, a state's population is what determines how many representatives it has in the House of Representatives. Larger states like California, for instance, have 53 representatives, but smaller states like Vermont and Delaware only have one.
To know more about two chambers of Congress visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/24180994
#SPJ4
a defendant in a criminal case is entitled to have the jury instructed on the law applicable to any legitimate theory of defense supported by the evidence at trial. True or False
The given statement is true, that is any valid theory of defense that is supported by the evidence at trial is entitled to have the jury instructed on the law that applies.
The evidence presented to the jury in court should be the basis for their decision. Based on their assessment of the evidence and what the judge instructs them regarding the law, they determine what has been proven and what has not, and they render a verdict on each count. A defendant must be found guilty if the jury is unanimous in its conviction. The highly dramatic phrase "beyond a reasonable doubt" may have been used. However, we now only inquire as to the jurors' level of certainty rather than saying that. The jury must acquit if they aren't certain of the defendant's guilt. The judge must determine if information is pertinent and whether it is appropriate for the jury to be informed of it.
The judge must determine if information is pertinent and whether it is appropriate for the jury to be informed of it. He might determine that it is irrelevant and out-of-date evidence that is just being used to malign the husband's reputation and sway the jury against him. In that case, he would disregard the proof.
To learn more about evidence please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/344776
#SPJ4
FILL IN THE BLANK. the___defines stiffer penalties for prosecution of terrorist crimes. economic espionage act sarbanes-oxley act usa patriot act gramm-leach-bliley act
The USA PATRIOT Act defines stiffer penalties for prosecution of terrorist crimes.
Under the USA PATRIOT Act which was formulated in the year 2001, efforts were made to stiffer the punishments of people who were included in terrorist crimes.
This act was formulated so that the crime rates by terrorists could be reduced not only in the USA but all over the world. The terrorists were subjected to severe punishments and penalties under the USA PATRIOT act. After this act, the criminals feared the penalties for prosecution and the crime rates were reduced.
The question will correctly be written as:
the___defines stiffer penalties for prosecution of terrorist crimes.
a) economic espionage act
b) sarbanes-oxley act
c) USA PATRIOT act
d) gramm-leach-bliley act
To learn more about crime, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
penalties for unlawful or accidental removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction of federal records or the attempt to do so, include a fine, imprisonment, or both. t or f
Federal records removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction that is unauthorised or unintentional, as well as the attempt to do so, are punishable by penalties, incarceration, or both. Hence, the given statement is true.
Due to their penal nature, penalties in English law are contractual clauses that are not enforceable in court. Since at least 1720, it has been recognised under English contract law that if a clause in a contract creates a punishment, the parties cannot enforce that clause.
But throughout time, the criteria for determining what counts as a penalty have changed. Without any general statutory intervention, the common law judges of England have totally evolved the law relating to contractual penalties.
However, in addition to the common law standards concerning penalties, there are regulations that specifically address how onerous clauses should be avoided.
Therefore, the given statement is true.
Learn more about penalties from here:
https://brainly.com/question/5532451
#SPJ4
in some campaigns, which of the following has begun to replace in the political party as the nominating and electing agent?
The political parties in the US hold national conventions to select the candidates for the presidency in the summer of the election year. At the convention, the democratic nominees are chosen.
What does the term "political views" mean?A political ideology, as used in social studies, is a particular collection of moral ideals, principles, doctrines, myths, or symbols of a mass group, institution, class, or large group that provides some political and social blueprint for a particular social order and explains how society should function.
What does the term "political issue" mean?A political issue is described as "any subject that deals by how power is dispersed and how it works within human group, and how individuals think about and engage in their communities" in the Global Economics course manual.
To know more about political visit:
brainly.com/question/28943362
#SPJ4
Cooperation among oligopolies runs counter to the public interest because it leads to underproduction and high prices. In an effort to bring resource allocation closer to the social optimum, public officials attempt to force oligopolies to compete instead of cooperating. Consider the following scenario: Suppose that executives working for two different automobile manufacturers exchange emails in which they discuss jointly increasing prices for their latest hybrid electric SUVs. This illegal communication would violate which of the following laws? The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 The Celler-Kefauver Act of 1950 The Robinson-Patman Act of 1936 The Clayton Act of 1914
In an effort to improve resource allocation closer to the optimal point, government employees try to force oligopolies to compete rather than to cooperate. The given statement is true.
What was "interest" supposed to convey exactly?
The cost of a loan is referred to as interest. As a yearly percentage of the loan amount, interest is most frequently expressed. The interest rate on the loan is shown by this percentage.
Which four categories of interests are there?
The most prevalent types of interest include fixed interest, variable interest, annual percentage rate first interest rate, discounted interest rate, simple involvement, and compound interest.
To learn more about interest please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/29480777
#SPJ4
Is Stevens correct in holding that our privacy interests in our residence, after the issuance of a no-knock warrant, consistent with the privacy interests we retain after the police are in the residence, in the context of a protective sweep? Same question, only consistent with the privacy interests we retain in our personal autonomy in the frisk aspect of a Terry stop? Is there a difference based on the status of the police intrusion? In other words, in the no-knock context, the citizen's interests are defined in the context of immediately prior to, or during the entry into the premises (i.e. the execution of the warrant), while in the protective sweep and the Terry frisk the defendant's privacy interests are already intruded upon.
Citizens have the right to refuse a search at any time thanks to the Fourth Amendment.
What safeguards are provided for citizens by the Fourth Amendment?
People are shielded from government unreasonable searches and seizures by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. However, only those searches and seizures that are deemed unreasonable by law are protected by the Fourth Amendment.
In public, do you have the right to privacy?
Expectation of Privacy in Public Although a person may not have the right to privacy when in public, the law can still protect them from having their private information broadcast or from being portrayed in a way that could be considered humiliating.
Learn more about Fourth Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/28246295
#SPJ4
which of the following is a correct description or assumption of pluralism as a theory that explains interest groups as group politics?
Which of the following is an assumption of pluralism?
A. Only wealthy interests have influence over government decisions.
B. Government decisions reflect the preferences of elites.
C. Interest groups are integral to government decisions.
D. Policy makers care more about public opinion than interest groups' preferences.
E. Political parties matter more than interest groups in shaping government policies.
The correct answer is option C, the correct assumption of pluralism is Government choices are heavily influenced by interest groups.
The idea that political and decision-making processes take place inside the framework of the government but that non-governmental organizations can still have an impact is known as classical pluralism. The distribution of influence and authority within the political system is the key issue for traditional pluralism.
According to pluralism, disputes frequently arise when different groups of people attempt to maximize their own interests, and the shifting of power is effective in negotiating power between different interest groups.
According to pluralists, there would still be inequities, but these would be leveled by the allocation of resources among a population. They favor an electoral system with a minimum of two parties, as well as freedom of association and religion.
To learn more about pluralism please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/14929497
#SPJ4
advocates of the responsible party model believe parties should craft a platform, candidates should run on that platform, and the majority party should _____ .
The responsible party model's advocates contend that parties ought to develop a platform, candidates ought to run on it, and the majority party ought to implement it.
The responsible party system is what?
The "responsible party" is the person or organization that controls, manages, or oversees the entity and the distribution of the entity's finances and assets, in contrast to a nominee, who is given little to no authority over the entity's assets.
What are the objectives of political parties' platforms?
Winning elections is the main objective of a party platform in order to control governmental power and carry out its objectives. This fundamental goal distinguishes parties from interest groups, who also seek to influence election outcomes but are not authorized to propose candidates for public office.
To learn more about advocates please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/17027382
#SPJ4
what does the oil pollution act of 1990 legislate for environmental disasters such as the one pictured below?
The Oil Pollution Act (OPA) of 1990 streamlined and strengthened EPA's capacity to prevent and answer catastrophic oil spills.
The Oil Pollution Act (OPA) of 1990 streamlined and strengthened EPA's capacity to prevent and answer catastrophic oil spills. A trust store funded by an expense on oil is available to tidy up spills when the party in question is unfit or reluctant to do as such. The OPA requires oil storerooms and vessels to submit to the Federal government plans enumerating how they will answer huge discharges. EPA has published guidelines for aboveground storage spaces; the Coast Watchman has done as such for oil big haulers. The OPA likewise requires the development of Region Emergency courses of action to get ready and plan for oil spill reaction on a local scale.
The Federal Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 established pollution prevention as the public strategy of the United States. The Federal Act pronounces that pollution ought to be prevented or diminished at the source wherever practical, while pollution that can't be prevented ought to be reused in an environmentally protected way.
to know more about the Federal Pollution Prevention Act click here:
https://brainly.com/question/16804832
#SPJ4
if victims wish to recoup their losses following a crime, they must rely on: group of answer choices a. substantive criminal law. b. procedural criminal law. c. real estate law. d. civil law.
Answer:
d. civil law.
Explanation:
If victims wish to recoup their losses following a crime, they must rely on civil law. In general, criminal law is concerned with punishing offenders for their actions, while civil law is concerned with providing remedies to individuals who have been wronged. This means that if a victim has suffered losses as a result of a crime, they may be able to file a civil lawsuit against the perpetrator in order to seek compensation for their losses. This is different from criminal law, which focuses on punishing the perpetrator through penalties such as fines or imprisonment.
The Constitution establishes the jobs and strictures of the operational institution of government, the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments set out the protections for the individuals served by the government.
True
The Constitution establishes the jobs and strictures of the operational institution of government, the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments set out the protections for the individuals served by the government. Given Statement are true.
The first ten amendments to the United States Constitution are known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights amendments, proposed following the often bitter 1787-88 debate over the ratification of the Constitution and written to address the objections raised by Anti-Federalists, add specific guarantees of personal freedoms and rights to the Constitution, clear limitations on the government's power in judicial and other proceedings, and explicit declarations that all powers not expressly granted to the federal government by the Constitution are reserved to the states.
These amendments codify concepts from earlier documents, particularly the Virginia Declaration of Rights (1776), as well as the Northwest Ordinance (1787), the English Bill of Rights (1689), and Magna Carta.
Learn more about Bill of Rights to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/6836926
#SPJ4
anticipatory punishment measuring power limitations to power fungibility of power projecting power over distances interactive effect between power and motivation
Yes, it is true that power projection over distances, power fungibility, and the interaction between power and motive are all factors in anticipated punishment.
Some could argue that a successful manager is a good manager, and by this point, the majority of business analysts and practitioners are aware of the driving forces behind entrepreneurs who are successful in running their own small enterprises. What psychologists refer to as the urge for achievement, or the desire to do something better or more effectively than it has been done before, has shown to be the secret to their success. Numerous books and articles provide summaries of scientific findings that demonstrate how success requires the achievement motive.
But what connection does accomplishment motivation have to effective management? Theoretically, there is no reason why a person with a strong desire to increase efficiency should make a successful manager. Although it may seem as though everyone should be driven to succeed, as achievement motivation is defined and assessed by psychologists, the urge to succeed actually causes people to act in ways that do not always promote effective management.
Learn more about anticipatory Visit: brainly.com/question/22725215
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
State true or false: Anticipatory punishment measuring power limitations to power fungibility of power projecting power over distances interactive effect between power and motivation.
The founder and director of the Institute of Criminalistics at the University of Lyons, France. Developed a principle about the transfer of trace evidence is _____
Answer:
Explanation:
fingerprints?
Aaron is a system administrator for a school district and have been assigned to maintain and decommission computer equipment throughout the district schools.
He has been assigned to review all the workstations currently being used by the administrative staff at the district and school levels to determine if they need to be replaced or upgraded to meet current administrative requirements. He decides to replace the workstations with new equipment, decommission the existing computers, and sell them to the public as surplus.
After selling several of the decommissioned computers, a local paper publishes an article about financial corruption in the school district with documentation to prove the accusations.
Which of the following steps in the Decommissioning process did Aaron fail to do that might have BEST prevented this situation?
Before the workstations were offered for sale to the general public, make sure that any private or sensitive information had been permanently deleted this is the Decommissioning step Aaron failed to do, which created such situation.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) defines decommissioning as the administrative and technical steps necessary to permit the removal of part or all regulatory controls from a site. It is the last stage of a nuclear installation's lifecycle and usually entails decommissioning superfluous nuclear facilities that have fully ceased operation as well as removing any related radioactive waste for secure disposal or storage. A plant could be shut down without being dismantled, and the remaining buildings could then be used for something else.
Decommissioning often involves lowering the levels of residual radionuclides in the materials and facilities on the site so they can be properly recycled, reused, or disposed of as exempt waste or radioactive waste in order to ensure the long-term protection of the people and the environment.
To learn more about Decommissioning please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/29213833
#SPJ4
which of the following best explains the three laws of mastery?
Having faith in your ability to complete the task, working diligently to correct your flaws, and understanding that mastery may never truly be attained.
What is the mastery art?Even when it seems like you are making no progress, practice is essential for mastery. Knowing how the journey towards Mastery functions really aids in taking it. In essence, competence is that enigmatic process that occurs as something initially challenging becomes increasingly simple and enjoyable with repetition.
What is the fundamental issue with mastery learning?Allowing up some of your classroom management and giving your students more authority is the single most difficult hard achievement that mastery learning entails. The learners, not your daily schedule, will determine how quickly the class moves forward and what projects they are working on.
To learn more about Mastery visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3130086
#SPJ4
FILL IN THE BLANK. one example of ___ is the fact that a lawsuit filed by washington against nevada over river pollution goes directly before the supreme court.
One example of original jurisdiction is the fact that a lawsuit filed by Washington against Nevada over river pollution goes directly before the supreme court.
What is original jurisdiction?In common law legal systems, a court's original jurisdiction is its authority to hear a case for the first time, as opposed to an appellate court's authority to review a lower court's ruling.
Certain instances, such as lawsuits involving two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers, fall under the Court's original jurisdiction (a matter is tried before the Court).
When a court has the power to hear a case for the first time, we say that court has original jurisdiction.
Read more on original jurisdiction here:https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ1
which of the following transactions would not be exempt from the sales literature and advertising filing requirements of the uniform securities act? a
Even though the bonds are an exempt security, the sale to an person consumer is now not an exempt transaction. Sales to institutions, income by fiduciaries, or unsolicited transactions are all exempt.
An exempt transaction is a type of securities transaction the place a commercial enterprise does now not need to file registrations with any regulatory bodies, supplied the wide variety of securities concerned is enormously minor in contrast to the scope of the issuer's operations and that no new securities are being issued.
What does exempt from transaction tax mean?Being tax-exempt skill that some or all of a transaction, entity or person's profits or enterprise is free from federal, country or neighborhood tax. Tax-exempt groups are normally charities or non secular companies diagnosed by using the IRS. Internal Revenue Service. Exempt Organization Types. Accessed Sep 14, 2022.
Learn more about exempt transaction here:
https://brainly.com/question/14319801#SPJ4the national safety council reports that distracted driving leads to 16 thousand crashes each year.
The National Safety Council estimates that distracted driving contributes to 16,000 collisions per year. The percentage of texting drivers who are not in their own lane on the road is around 10%.
According to statistics, texting while driving is one form of driver distraction that accounts for a sizable portion of collisions. Cell phone usage or texting while driving was a contributing factor in 13% of distracted driving collisions that resulted in fatalities, according to 2020 NHTSA statistics. a week ago
Over 3,000 people will pass away in 2022 as a result of distracted driving, according to the CDC. How many fatalities result from texting while driving? According to statistics, texting while driving causes 400 fatalities annually in the US.
Read more about national safety council at
https://brainly.com/question/9807015
#SPJ4
These lyrics are representative of a movement that culminated in a constitutional amendment during the ___
a. Harlem Renaissance
b. New Deal
c. Reconstruction Era
d. Progressive Era
what is the purpose of bail?a. to insure that the defendant shows up for trialb. to compensate victims of crimesc. to restrict the physical activities of the defendant before triald. to begin the process of punishment and rehabilitation before the tria
Bail is only intended to guarantee that defendants will show up for their trial and any required pretrial hearings. When a defendant's trial is over, several states deduct a processing fee before returning their bail to them.
The sum of money known as bail is required from defendants in order to be freed from custody prior to their trial. A bond is not a fine. It shouldn't be applied as a form of discipline. Bail is only intended to guarantee that defendants will show up for their trial and any required pretrial hearings. In some places, bail is refunded to defendants upon the conclusion of their case, less a processing charge.
The court or magistrate considers a number of issues when determining the bond amount: the possibility that the criminal may flee, the alleged offense, the "dangerousness" of the defendants, and the public safety.
To learn more about Bail please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/14272042
#SPJ4
what are the goals of the affordable care act?