A. Brazil and the United States are two of the world's top beef producers.
What is it supported by?B. Beef production is supported by grassland or prairie landscapes that offer ample space for grazing and sufficient rainfall for pasture growth. Regions with a moderate climate, such as the Great Plains in North America, the Pampas in South America, and the savannas of Africa, are well-suited for beef production.
C. Top beef-producing countries tend to have large areas of grasslands, such as the United States, Brazil, and Argentina. These countries also have large-scale commercial beef operations, which have led to deforestation in some regions. Additionally, they tend to have well-developed transportation and infrastructure networks that facilitate the movement of beef products.
D. Commercial farming is focused on producing crops and livestock for sale and profit, while subsistence farming is focused on producing enough food for personal consumption. Commercial farming is typically mechanized, utilizes advanced technologies and capital-intensive inputs, and tends to be larger in scale than subsistence farming, which is more labor-intensive and utilizes traditional farming techniques.
E. Subsistence farming is most likely to be practiced in regions with limited access to markets, such as remote mountainous or island areas. In these areas, subsistence farmers typically cultivate small plots of land and rely on traditional farming practices.
F. Women play a significant role in subsistence farming, contributing to various aspects of agricultural production, including planting, harvesting, and processing crops. Women also have a strong role in community-based decision-making, such as organizing farming cooperatives or determining crop rotation schedules.
G. Complex commodity chains link beef production with consumption through various stages of processing, distribution, and marketing. These chains involve multiple actors, including farmers, processors, wholesalers, retailers, and consumers, and involve complex logistics and supply chain management. The environmental and social impacts of beef production are shaped by these commodity chains.
A. Ecotourism is a form of sustainable tourism that focuses on visiting natural areas and promoting conservation and sustainable development.
B. Costa Rica is a country where ecotourism is a major source of income, due to its diverse natural environment, which includes rainforests, coral reefs, and volcanic landscapes.
C. Ecotourism can have positive impacts on the natural environment by promoting conservation, funding conservation efforts, and providing alternative livelihoods for local communities that rely on natural resources. Ecotourism can also provide a means of educating visitors about the importance of environmental conservation and sustainable development.
D. Ecotourism can have negative impacts on the natural environment, such as causing habitat destruction and wildlife disturbance, generating pollution, and degrading natural resources through overuse. Ecotourism can also create social and economic inequalities by benefiting certain groups, such as tour operators, at the expense of local communities.
E. Ecotourism can have a positive impact on the cultural landscape by promoting cultural heritage preservation, generating income for local communities through cultural tourism, and providing a means of cultural exchange between visitors and host communities.
F. Ecotourism can have a negative impact on the cultural landscape by commodifying culture and turning it into a product for consumption, eroding traditional cultural practices and knowledge, and creating cultural homogenization through the standardization of cultural performances and practices.
G. The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) relate to the geographic concept of ecotourism by emphasizing the need for sustainable development that balances economic, social, and environmental concerns. The SDGs promote the conservation of natural resources and the promotion of sustainable tourism that benefits local communities and promotes cultural heritage preservation. Ecotourism can contribute to achieving several SDGs, including those related to poverty reduction, environmental conservation, and sustainable economic development.
Read more about Ecotech here:
https://brainly.com/question/949008
#SPJ1
What were the causes and effects of the grown of suburbia in the 1950s? How did this impact American culture?
The growth of suburbia in the 1950s was caused by several factors, including the post-World War II economic boom, the availability of low-cost housing loans, and the desire of families to own a single-family home with a yard in a safe and quiet neighborhood.
What is the explanation for the above response?
The growth of suburbia in the 1950s was caused by several factors, including the post-World War II economic boom, the availability of low-cost housing loans, and the desire of families to own a single-family home with a yard in a safe and quiet neighborhood.
This led to the creation of sprawling suburban communities outside of urban areas, which had a significant impact on American culture. Suburbia created a sense of conformity and homogeneity, as families often had similar lifestyles and values. It also led to increased car dependency, as suburbanites commuted to work and other activities. Also, the growth of suburbia contributed to urban sprawl and environmental degradation.
Learn more about American culture at:
https://brainly.com/question/17396096
#SPJ1
explains how the influence that interest groups exert through iron triangles and issue networks either strengthens or hinders our governmental system.
Interest groups are organizations or associations that seek to influence public policy by advocating for particular issues or promoting their own interests. They can exert their influence through two main channels: iron triangles and issue networks.
Iron triangles refer to the relationships that develop between interest groups, congressional committees, and federal agencies. These relationships can create a powerful feedback loop in which interest groups provide support and campaign contributions to elected officials, who in turn provide favorable legislation and funding to federal agencies. The federal agencies then work closely with interest groups and congressional committees to implement policies that benefit all three parties.
On the one hand, iron triangles can be seen as strengthening our governmental system by providing a mechanism for interest groups to participate in the policymaking process. By working within the system, interest groups can have their voices heard and advocate for their interests in a way that is consistent with democratic principles.
However, iron triangles can also be problematic. By creating a closed system of relationships between interest groups, federal agencies, and congressional committees, iron triangles can shut out other voices and perspectives, leading to policies that may not reflect the broader public interest. Moreover, iron triangles can create a sense of "capture" in which agencies become more responsive to interest groups than to the broader public they are intended to serve.
Issue networks, on the other hand, are looser and more diffuse relationships between interest groups, policy experts, and other actors who share a common interest in a particular policy issue. Issue networks can be seen as strengthening our governmental system by bringing a wider range of perspectives and expertise to bear on policy issues. By working across organizational boundaries, issue networks can promote more collaborative and informed policymaking.
However, issue networks can also be problematic. Because they are less formalized than iron triangles, issue networks may lack accountability and transparency. Moreover, because they are often centered around a particular policy issue, issue networks may be less effective in promoting broader political and social goals.
In summary, interest groups can exert a significant influence on our governmental system through iron triangles and issue networks. While these channels can strengthen our democratic principles by promoting greater participation and collaboration, they can also create problems of capture, lack of accountability, and narrowness of focus. As with many aspects of our political system, the challenge is to balance the benefits of interest group participation against these potential risks.
(The following passage is excerpted from an essay by a twentieth-century American author.) In France, on a rented canal boat, my friends and I gazed in despair at the closed oaken gates of the lock. We’d come to them only seconds after the witching hour of noon, but we were too late. There was no one to open the lock for us; l’éclusière1 was at lunch, and after lunch she would lay herself down, close her eyes, and nap. At two, but not before, she would emerge refreshed from her square granite house and set the great cogs in motion. We tied the boat up to a spindly bush beside the towpath and waited. And waited. It was high haying season, but the fields lay empty of farmers. The roads lay empty of trucks. France lunched, and then slept. So did Spain. So did much of the civilized world. If we’d been differently nurtured we too would have taken a nap, but we were Americans, condemned from the age of four to trudge through our sleepless days. Americans are afraid of naps. Napping is too luxurious, too sybaritic,2 too unproductive, and it’s free; pleasures for which we don’t pay make us anxious. Besides, it seems to be a natural inclination. Those who get paid to investigate such things have proved that people deprived of daylight and their wristwatches, with no notion of whether it was night or day, sink blissfully asleep in midafternoon as regular as clocks. Fighting off natural inclinations is a major Puritan3 virtue, and nothing that feels that good can be respectable. They may have a point there. Certainly the process of falling asleep in the afternoon is quite different from bedtime sleep. Whether this is physiological or merely a by-product of guilt, it’s a blatantly sensual experience, a voluptuous surrender, akin to the euphoric swoon of the heroine in a vampire movie. For the self-controlled, it’s frightening—how far down am I falling? will I ever climb back? The sleep itself has a different texture. It’s blacker, thicker, more intense, and works faster. Fifteen minutes later the napper pops back to the
The author describes an experience in France, where they were waiting for a lock to open on their rented canal boat.
Why is this so?They had arrived just after noon, but the person who was supposed to open the lock was at lunch and taking a nap afterwards.
The author notes that in much of the civilized world, people take naps after lunch, but Americans are afraid of naps because they are seen as too luxurious, unproductive, and free.
The author muses on the pleasures of taking an afternoon nap, noting that it is a sensual and euphoric experience, but also frightening for the self-controlled.
Learn more about author's view point at:
https://brainly.com/question/9260046
#SPJ1
Smiling before telling a joke is an example of what? A. Accenting a message B. Repeating a message. C. Controlling a message D. Competing nonverbal messages