Please solve! grammer really easy!

Answer:

1. Cassius is concerned Brutus is upset and is being less kind than normal.

Explanation:

I just took the test

In this encounter, Cassius charges Brutus with treating him unfairly. Brutus responds by accusing Cassius of taking bribes and reiterating that they killed Caesar to stop him from becoming corrupt, not so that they could become corrupt. When the argument turns personal, Cassius pulls a knife and challenges Brutus to kill him. Thus, option A is correct.

What Cassius is concerned, Brutus is upset?

When left alone, Cassius confesses that he thinks Brutus is easily swayed and aims to persuade him to rebel against Caesar by sending him false letters that appear to be from irate citizens pleading with him to do so.

Cassius tells Brutus that Caesar is just another mortal like them, with typical human flaws, and that he would sooner die than let such a person to rule over him. He reminds Brutus of his aristocratic ancestry and the Romans' hopes that he will uphold their nation's interests as his forefathers did.

Therefore, Cassius is concerned Brutus is upset and is being less kind than normal.

Learn more about Cassius here:

https://brainly.com/question/11162048

#SPJ2

Answer:

true

Explanation:

The author most likely chose to introduce her argument by way of a personal anecdote in order to

A. share the perspective of someone usually regarded as a typical Wyoming resident

B. invites the audience to empathize with the difficulties she faced growing up in Wyoming

C. challenge her audience’s assumptions about Wyoming residents

D. avoid having to incorporate historical and statistical data into her argument

E. disclose events that might have made her unintentionally biased

Answer:

C. challenge her audience’s assumptions about Wyoming residents

Explanation:

An anecdote is simply the use of personal experience to make illustrations.

Therefore, the author most likely chose to introduce her argument by way of a personal anecdote in order to challenge her audience’s assumptions about Wyoming residents.

With her use of personal anecdote, she shows that she has some experience about Wyoming residents and they are not what many people assume they are.

Answer: C. challenge her audience’s assumptions about Wyoming residents

Explanation:  The passage addresses the larger topic of Wyoming’s identity as a state. Choosing to introduce this topic via a personal anecdote enables the author to draw on her own biography and perspective as an Asian American woman to challenge stereotypes about the “typical Wyoming person.” Moreover, the introduction establishes that the author is using the personal essay form, which is particularly appropriate for her broader purpose, that is, to change Wyoming’s reputation as a white, conservative state. As someone who is Asian American and yet identifies Wyoming as the place “where [she is] from,” the author is in a good position to use her own story to establish a place for immigrants and minorities in Wyoming’s cultural identity.

Answer and Explanation:

The Heckscher-Ohlin economic model, also known as H-O theorem, presents the idea that trade relations between the two countries are based on the resource that each country has in abundance, that is, each country will exploit economically, the most abundant resource and establish trade relations with other countries, exporting it.

We can prove this theorem, by observing that countries that have favorable environmental conditions for agriculture, will establish their commercial relations based on the agricultural products that they can export. Among these countries, we can mention China and its strong export of rice and Brazil and its strong export of orange juice. On the other hand, countries that have as main resource the production of machines, will export these machines to establish their commercial relations, like Germany and a strong export of automobiles.

Geez that’s a lot to read

The H-O theorem predicts the pattern of trade between countries based on the characteristics of the countries. The H-O theorem says that a capital-abundant country will export the capital-intensive good, while the labor-abundant country will export the labor-intensive good. Hope this helps! Mark brainly please!

Answer:

While spending time with Cassie, Raymond made-up a story about them previously having fun at Edisto Gardens. Later Cassie Remembered the event though it never occurred . Cassie is likely experiencing

Explanation:

While spending time with Cassie, Raymond made-up a story about them previously having fun at Edisto Gardens. Later Cassie Remembered the event though it never occurred . Cassie is likely experiencing false memory. Hence option c is correct.

What are memories?

Memories are defined as the procedure of absorbing data from the environment, processing it, storing it, and then retrieving that data. Memory is primarily composed of three processes: encoding, storage, and retrieval. Data storage and retrieval abilities are part of human memory capacity.

The first one is ineffective because flashbulb memory refers to a random memory. The second one's nature is unknown to me. The third option might be effective, but a memory bias is when a memory is altered. not entirely made up.

Thus, while spending time with Cassie, Raymond made-up a story about them previously having fun at Edisto Gardens. Later Cassie Remembered the event though it never occurred . Cassie is likely experiencing false memory. Hence option c is correct.

To learn more about memories, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/14829385

#SPJ2

Answer: 1. Breaking the law

2. Violating ethical standards

Explanation:

1. A doctor gives out confidential patient health information to friends at a dinner party.

Here, the doctor is breaking the law. Giving out someone's confidential information without the consent of the person is wrong. The doctor can be jailed for doing such as he is breaking the law.

2. A doctor withholds information from a patient about the patient's health because he is worried about how

the patient might react.

This is a violation of ethical standards. Ethical standards are principles that underlies moral values. The doctor isn't meant to withold the information from the patient as the patient has the right to know what's happening regarding his or her health.

Answer:

'Kay.

Explanation:

I'll help you, but where are the questions?

Late preterm (LP) infants are defined as those born at 34-0/7 to 36-6/7 weeks’ gestational age. LP infants were previously referred to as near term infants. The change in terminology resulted from the understanding that these infants are not fully mature and that the last 6 weeks of gestation represent a critical period of growth and development of the fetal brain and lungs, and of other systems. There is accumulating evidence of higher risks for health complications in these infants, including serious morbidity and a threefold higher infant mortality rate compared with term infants. This information is of critical importance because of its scientific merits and practical implications. However, it warrants a critical and balanced review, given the apparent overall uncomplicated outcome for the majority of LP infants.

Others reviewed the characteristics of LP infants that predispose them to a higher risk of morbidity at the neonatal period. This review focuses on the long-term neurodevelopmental and respiratory outcomes, with the main aim to suggest putative prenatal, neonatal, developmental, and environmental causes for these increased morbidities. It demonstrates parallelism in the trajectories of pulmonary and neurologic development and evolution as a model for fetal and neonatal maturation. These may suggest the critical developmental time period as the common pathway that leads to the outcomes. Disruption in this pathway with potential long-term consequences in both systems may occur if the intrauterine milieu is disturbed. Finally, the review addresses the practical implications on perinatal and neonatal care during infancy and childhood. Hope this helps! Mark brainly please!