Please help me with this question? ​

Answer:

It slopes downward from left to right. You can see the downward slope of that gender, which starts at the left and moves to the right.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Well first lets break it down into steps!

We have 1 cake.

Brother ate: 1/8

Mom ate: 1/8

Dad ate: 1/4

Now we know that 1/8 + 1/8 = 1/4.

So her brother and mom combined ate 1/4th of the cake.

Her dad also ate 1/4th.

So we have 1 - (1/4) - (1/4) = 2/4 = 1/2.

1/2 of the cake is left.

Answer:

True

Step-by-step explanation:

1,760 yds = 1 mile, 1,760 ÷ 2 = 880

Answer:

a. 61.92 in²

b. 21.396 ≈ 21.4%

c. $4.71

Step-by-step explanation:

a. Amount of waste = area of rectangular piece of stock - area of two identical circles cut out

Area of rectangular piece of stock = 24 in × 12 in = 288 in²

Area of the two circles = 2(πr²)

Use 3.14 as π

radius = ½*12 = 6

Area of two circles = 2(3.14*6²) = 226.08 in²

Amount of waste = 288 - 226.08 = 61.92 in²

b. % of the original stock wasted = amount of waste ÷ original stock × 100

= 61.92/288 × 100 = 6,162/288 = 21.396 ≈ 21.4%

c. 288 in² of the piece of stock costs $12.00,

Each cut-out circle of 113.04 in² (226.08/2) will cost = (12*113.04)/288

= 1,356.48/288 = $4.71.

Answer:

-1 + 7 =-8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-6, -7

Step-by-step explanation:

-1 + -6 = -7

Answer:  

-3, -4, -15, -17, -18, -23, -26

Explanation:

The umbers away from zero are least and the numbers closer to zero are greater

Answer:

1)    

FLAW                         TYPE2         NO TYPE2 FLAW

TYPE1                         0.015           0.025

NO TYPE1 FLAW        0.01             0.95

2) 0.04 and $0.04

3) 0.025 and $0.025

4) 0.015 and $0.015

5) 0.95 and $0.95

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that;

financial cost = $1

p(flaw) = 0.05  

p(type 1 flaw / flaw) = 80% = 0.8

p(type 2 flaw / flaw) = 50% = 0.5

p( type 1 and 2 flaw/flaw) = 30% = 0.30

1) Bivariate Table

p( type 1 flaw) = p(flaw) × p(type 1 flaw/flaw) = 0.05 × 0.8 = 0.04

p( type 2 flaw) = p(flaw) × p(type 2 flaw/flaw)  = 0.05 × 0.5 = 0.025

p( type 1 and 2 flaw) =  p(flow) × p( type 1 & 2 flaw/flaw) = 0.05 × 0.3 = 0.015

p( only 1 flow) = 0.04 - 0.015 = 0.025

p( only 2 flow) =  0.025 - 0.015 = 0.01

THEREFORE  the Bivariate Table;

FLAW                         TYPE2         NO TYPE2 FLAW

TYPE1                         0.015           0.025

NO TYPE1 FLAW       0.01              0.95

2) probability and expectations of type 1 flaw?

p( type 1 flaw) = p(flaw) × p(type 1 flaw/flaw) = 0.05 × 0.8 = 0.04

Expected financial cost to the firm per good = $1 × 0.04 = $0.04

3)  probability and expectation of Type 2 flaw

p( type 2 flaw) = p(flaw) × p(type 2 flaw/flaw)  = 0.05 × 0.5 = 0.025

Expected financial cost to the firm per good = $1 × 0.025 = $0.025

4) probability and expectations of Type 1 and 2 flaws

p( type 1 and 2 flaw) =  p(flow) × p( type 1 & 2 flaw/flaw) = 0.05 × 0.3 = 0.015

Expected financial cost to the firm per good = $1 * 0.015 = $0.015

5) probability and expectations of no flaws?

Probability of no flaw = P(No flaw) =95% =  0.95

Expected financial cost saved the firm per good due to no flaw

= $1 × 0.95 = $0.95

Answer:

15.6

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is 15.6 because if you divide 9 3/4 by 5/8, you get 78/5, or 15.6 in decimal form. Hope it helps!

Answer:

Here's the parallel line: y = 5x - 4

Answer:

81

Step-by-step explanation:

3^4

=3*3*3*3

=81

Hope this helps!!

Answer:

you need to provide more information lol

Step-by-step explanation:

e

Answer:3

Step-by-step explanation:

C = 2()r

2*3.14 = 6.28

18.84 / 6.28

=3

If correct pls give brainly

Answer:

-18

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x>5

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to find the integration of (36x²)x.dx .

We know,

[tex]\int x^n.dx = \dfrac{x^{n+1}}{n+1} +c[/tex]

Now,

[tex]I=\int {36x^2x} \, dx \\\\I=36\int x^3.dx\\ \\I=36\times \dfrac{x^4}{4}+c\\\\I=9x^4+c[/tex]

Therefore, the integration of (36x²)x.dx is [tex]9x^4+c[/tex] .

Hence, this is the required solution.

I'll answer this question in a bit, I am busy with some other things right now.

Answer:

You know 18:3 and 6:1 are equivalent ratios because if you take 18:3 and divide both sides by 3, 18/3:3/3, then you will get 6:1, which is clearly equal to 6:1.

18:3  and 6:1  are equivalent ratio because two ratios are in proportion

Given :

We are given with two ratios 18:3  and 6:1

We need to show that two ratios are equal

Lets take ration 18:3

Both 18  and 3  are divisible by 3

We can write the ratio in fraction form

[tex]\frac{18}{3} \\[/tex]

When we divide both top and bottom by 3  , we get

[tex]\frac{6}{1}[/tex]

we can say that [tex]\frac{18}{3} =\frac{6}{1}[/tex]

Hence, the ratios are equivalent ratios

18:3  and 6:1  are equivalent ratios

Learn more : brainly.com/question/18431407

Answer:

Find the common denominator.  :)

twenty-two and thirty-five hundredths

There are 22 workers are available in the factory.

Wages is the payment for work based on hours worked (or sometimes per day or per amount of work done).

Here, Let the number of workers in the factory be x.

         Basic rate = $15

    Working hours in a week  = 48 hours

     Total wages in a week = $ 15840

If no overtime is to be paid then according to question,

   Amount paid to 1 worker = 48 X 15 = $ 720

  Amount paid to x worker = 720x

                 15840 = 720x

                    x = 15840/720

                    x = 22

Thus, There are 22 workers are available in the factory.

Learn more about Wages from:

https://brainly.com/question/14895331

#SPJ1

Answer:

Samantha payed 12.71$ for her purchase.

Step-by-step explanation:

I may have misunderstood the question, but it looks like you can use a calculator for this!

6.19 + 2.85 + 2.29 + 1.38 =

12.71

Hi there & welcome to brainly !

Answer:

[tex] \huge{ \bold{ \boxed{ \tt{1.4}}}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \text{Given : f \: = \: 12 \: g = 2}[/tex]

[tex] \text{To \: find : Value \: of \: given \: expression}[/tex]

[tex] \text{Let's \: start}[/tex] :

[tex] \text{0.5f \: - 2.3g}[/tex]

Here, The values of f and g are 12 and 2 respectively. Plug the given values :

↦ [tex] \text{0.5 ∗ \: 12 - 2.3 ∗ 2}[/tex]

Multiply : 0.5 and 12

↦ [tex] \text{6 - 2.3 \: ∗ \: 2}[/tex]

Multiply : 2.3 and 2

↦ [tex] \text{6 - 4.6}[/tex]

Subtract 4.6 from 6

↦ [tex] \text{ \boxed{1.4}}[/tex]

Hope I helped!

Best regards! :D

~[tex] \text{TheAnimeGirl}[/tex]

The solution of the given expression will be; 1.4

Expression in maths is defined as the collection of numbers variables and functions by using signs like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

We are given that  0.5f - 2.3g where f = 12 and g = 2

Now substitute 12 in for f and 2 in for g and solve;

0.5(12)  -2.3(2)

6 - 4.6

=1.4

To know more about an expression follow;

brainly.com/question/19876186

#SPJ2

The complete question is;

Evaluate the expression: 0.5f - 2.3g where f = 12 and g = 2

Answer:

A. There are two complex roots

Step-by-step explanation:

Just took the test

If the discriminant of a quadratic equation is equal to Negative 8, there are two complex roots.

The discriminant of a quadratic equation is given as;

[tex]b^2 - 4ac>0 \ \ ( 2 \ solutions; 1 \ positive \ and \ 1 \ negative\ solution)\\\\b^2 -4ac = 0 \ \ (1 \ real \ solution)\\\\b^2 - 4ac \ < 0 \ \ (complex \ root, \ no \ solution)[/tex]

A discriminant of negative 8 falls with last category in the solution above.

[tex]b^2 - 4ac <0 \ \ (eg \ -8),[/tex]

[tex]x = +/-\sqrt{-8} \\\\x = \sqrt{-8 } \ \ or \ \ -\sqrt{-8} \ \ \ \ \ (2 \ complex \ roots)[/tex]

Thus, if the discriminant of a quadratic equation is equal to Negative 8, there are two complex roots.

Learn more about discriminant of quadratic equation here: https://brainly.com/question/4318614

Answer:

a=3 b=4

Step-by-step explanation:

a on the power of 3 is 8

3 on the power of 4 is 81

multiply them and you get 648

Answer:

177

Hope this helps

12 dolars / 20 dolars

the percentage is

(20-12) / 20

= 8/20

= 40 %

Answer:

(-1,-6)

Step-by-step explanation:

Because it is reflecting across the x-axis, the x value remains the same but the y value moves down the axis the same distance it was, meaning that the y part of the coordinate becomes the opposite.

For example, if (1,2) was reflected across the x-axis, it becomes (1,-2).