Part 2: Find the area of each of the given shapes below. If a shape has shading, find the area of the shaded region only. NO LINKS!​

Answer:

It's A bar graph but I got to see the question to be for sure but its a bar graph and it helps you  measure rates of things from numbers , months , years etc .

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7½ cups of sugar

Step-by-step explanation:

2 cups of flour needs 3 cups of sugar

1 cups of flour needs 3/2=1.5 cups of sugar

1×5 cups of flour needs 1.5×5=7.5 cups of sugar=7½ cups of sugar ANS

Answer: 72

Step-by-step explanation:

0.11*a = 12

0.66*a = ?

Hint: We don't need to find a to answer this question! Just find the relationship with these equations.

0.66*a = 6*(0.11*a) = 6*12 = 72

Answer:

hello

Step-by-step explanation:

say hell-o

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

=> 3x + 4y + 6z = 15

=> 3x + 4y + 6z - 4y = 15 - 4y

=> 3x + 6z = 15 - 4y

=> 3x + 6z - 6z = 15 - 4y - 6z

=> 3x = 15 - 4y - 6z

[tex] = > \frac{3x}{3} = \frac{15 - 4y - 6z}{3} [/tex]

[tex] = > x = 5 - \frac{4}{3} y - 2z \: (ans)[/tex]

[tex]\orange{••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••}[/tex]

[tex]\huge\bold\orange{QUESTIONS:}[/tex]

[tex]\orange{••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••}[/tex]

[tex]\huge\bold\orange{ANSWER:}[/tex]

[tex]x = 5 - \frac{4}{3} y - 2z[/tex]

[tex]\orange{••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••}[/tex]

[tex]\huge\bold\orange{SOLUTION:}[/tex]

[tex]3 \orange{+ 4y + 6z = 15}[/tex]

Move the variables to the right-hand side and change their signs.

[tex]3x = 15 \orange{ - 4 - 6z}[/tex]

Divide both sides of the equation by 3

[tex]\orange{3x = 15 - 4 - 6z}[/tex]

[tex]↓[/tex]

[tex]\orange{x = 5 - \frac{4}{3} y - 2z}[/tex]

The x-intercepts of 3x+4y+6z=15 is

[tex]x = 5 - \frac{4}{3} y - 2z[/tex]

[tex]\orange{••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••}[/tex]

#CarryOnlearning

Answer:

n=22.23

Step-by-step explanation:

21+n=43.23

-21 to both sides

0+n=22.23

n=22.23

Answer:

66

Step-by-step explanation:

66 is the only number between 63 and 68 that is divisible by both 2 and 11.

66/2=33   66/11=6

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

x value of M is 1 - (-3) = 4 units to the right of A

B will be another 4 units to the right of M or x = 1 + 4 = 5

y value of M is -4 - (-6) = 2 units above A

B will be another 2 units above M or y = -4 + 2 = -2

B = (5, -2)

From the given diagram, the following statements are true:

AB = BC

3y = 5y - 22

3y - 5y = -22

-2y = -22

y = 11

Similarly, m<DBE = 50 degrees

m<BED = 90 - m<DBE

m<BED = 90 - 50

m<BED = 40 degrees

Since BE = BC = 3y

BE = BC = 3(11) = 33

Also, 7x  - 2 = 40

7x = 40 + 2

7x = 42

x = 6

Get the measure of m<BEA

m<BEA = 7x - 2

m<BEA = 7(6) - 2

m<BEA = 40 degrees

Learn more on angles here: https://brainly.com/question/16281260

Answer:

127/100 = 1.27

1.4

1 whole and 1/3 = 1.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps

May I get Braineist pls

Answer:

1,200

Step-by-step explanation

Multiply 720 and 100 = 72,000

Divide by 60 = 1,200

Answer:

The answer is 1,200

Step-by-step explanation:

First Multiply 720 and 100 which = 72,000

Then Divide 72,000 by 60 = 1,200

Using it's formula, it is found that the slope of the line formed from the two given places is of [tex]\mathbf{\frac{6}{7}}[/tex]

Given two points [tex](x_1, y_1)[/tex] and [tex](x_2,y_2)[/tex], the slope is given by change in y divided by change in x, that is:

[tex]m = \frac{y_2 - y_1}{x_2 - x_1}[/tex]

In this problem:

Hence, applying the formula for the slope, considering [tex](x_1, y_1) = (-1, -4)[/tex] and [tex](x_2,y_2) = (6,2)[/tex]:

[tex]m = \frac{2 - (-4)}{6 - (-1)} = \frac{6}{7}[/tex]

The slope is of [tex]\mathbf{\frac{6}{7}}[/tex]

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/5427529

[tex]1)3k - 2k \\ = k(3 - 2) \\ = k(1) \\ = k[/tex]

[tex]2) {5x}^{2} - 10x - {8x}^{2} + x \\ = {5x}^{2} - {8x}^{2} - 10x + x \\ = - 3 {x}^{2} - 9x \\ = - 3x(x - 3)[/tex]

[tex]3) - (m + n) + 2(m - 3n) \\ = - m - n + 3m - 6n \\ = - m + 2m - n - 6n \\ = m - 7n [/tex]

Hope you could get an idea from here.

Doubt clarification - use comment section.

Answer:

7 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

she could park there for 7 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

13-4=9 9/1.50=6

[tex]\huge \bf༆ Answer ༄[/tex]

For converting radians to degree, we multiply the value in radian by [tex] \dfrac{180}{π}[/tex]

That is ~

Answer:

gradient M = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

pick any two pairs

M= change in Y / change in X

considering the last pairs

3--1/0--1=4✓

considering first pair

-1--5/-1--2 is also 4✓

I hope it helps

slope:change in x\change in y

he must buy 24 jackets to get atheist 260 dollars

Answer:

the answer is A)5+0.5n=11

Step-by-step explanation:

5 is increased by half a number, so half of. a number(n) is added to 5

Answer:

D is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this helps

5 increased by half a number is 11.

5 increased by half a number is 11. 5 + 1/2n = 11 where n is the unknown number. 1/2n = 11 - 5 = 6 n = 6 * 2 = 12 The number is 12.

Step-by-step explanation:

I assume you mean how do you divide a fraction by a whole number

In order to divide a fraction by a whole number we must use the KFC rule or the "Keep, flip, change" rule

The "Keep" means we keep the first fraction the same.

Next, we "flip" the second fraction (or in this case number; however it can be made into a fraction by putting it over 1). So now we have 4/10 divided by 1/2

Then we "change" the symbol so instead of dividing the fraction, we change the divide to a multiply.

Lastly, you just multiply the fractions as you usually would and you should end up with 4/20 which simplifies to 1/5 if my maths is correct.

Hope this helps.

Answer:

you can use KCF for this answer as well

Step-by-step explanation:

2 as a fraction would be 2/1

you need 4/10 divided by 2/1

applying KCF, you change it to be 4/10 multiplied by 1/2

solve to get 4/20 or simplified 1/5

hope this helped :)

Answer:

D!!!

Step-by-step explanation:

you have to make a table to see that randy has run 3 miles.!!!

Answer: D is the correct answer!

Step-by-step explanation: Like the one above me!

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

(x-2)(x-11) less than or equal to 0

which means x is between 2 and 11 when it is less than 0

Answer:  1170 miles

Work Shown:

(18 miles)/(1 gallon) = (x miles)/(65 gallons)

18/1 = x/65

x/65 = 18

x = 65*18

x = 1170

Answer: 1170 miles

1 gallon of gas --> 18 miles

65 gallon of gas --> 18 * 65 (which is 1170 miles)

Answer:

Yes, this is a function

Step-by-step explanation:

You know this because it passes the vertical line test.

I hope this helps!

Answer:

Function

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

root 490

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The gradient is negative.

Step-by-step explanation:

The gradient represents the rise/run ratio. Always read the line's path left to right, and if it goes up, then it is positive, down means negative gradient, and if it doesnt move then it 0. It is undefined if the line is vertical.

I'll do the first two parts to get you started.

=====================================================

Part (i)

We can show that the operation [tex]\nabla[/tex] is not commutative by picking two random and different real numbers for a,b. In other words, I'm using a counter-example.

Let's say we go for a = 1 and b = 2

[tex]a \nabla b = \frac{3a+b}{5} - 1\\\\1 \nabla 2 = \frac{3*1+2}{5} - 1\\\\1 \nabla 2 = \frac{5}{5} - 1\\\\1 \nabla 2 = 1 - 1\\\\1 \nabla 2 = 0\\\\[/tex]

Now let's swap the values. We'll try a = 2 and b = 1

[tex]a \nabla b = \frac{3a+b}{5} - 1\\\\2 \nabla 1 = \frac{3*2+1}{5} - 1\\\\2 \nabla 1 = \frac{7}{5} - 1\\\\2 \nabla 1 = 1.4 - 1\\\\2 \nabla 1 = 0.4\\\\[/tex]

We can see that [tex]1 \nabla 2[/tex] and [tex]2 \nabla 1[/tex] are not the same value. In general, [tex]a \nabla b \ne b \nabla a[/tex] Therefore, the operation [tex]\nabla[/tex] is not commutative.

The only time [tex]a \nabla b = b \nabla a\\\\[/tex] is true is when [tex]a = b[/tex], since,

[tex]\frac{3a+b}{5}-1 = \frac{3b+a}{5}-1\\\\\frac{3a+a}{5}-1 = \frac{3a+a}{5}-1\\\\\frac{4a}{5}-1 = \frac{4a}{5}-1\\\\[/tex]

It's when [tex]a \ne b[/tex] is where the operation becomes noncommutative.

Another way to arrive at the [tex]a = b[/tex] condition is to solve the original equation for either 'a' or b.

=====================================================

Part (ii)

Using the previous part as inspiration, we'll do a counter-example to show that the operation is not associative. Pick 3 random values for a,b,c. Here are the values I'll pick.

Then,

[tex]d = b \nabla c = \frac{3b+c}{5}-1 = \frac{3*2+3}{5}-1 = 0.8\\\\a \nabla (b \nabla c) = a \nabla d = \frac{3a+d}{5}-1 = \frac{3*1+0.8}{5}-1 = -0.24\\[/tex]

Next, we can say:

[tex]d = a \nabla b = \frac{3a+b}{5}-1 = \frac{3*1+2}{5}-1 = 0\\\\(a \nabla b) \nabla c = d \ \nabla c = \frac{3d+c}{5}-1 = \frac{3*0+3}{5}-1 = -0.4[/tex]

Let's compare the two outputs:

[tex]a \nabla (b \nabla c) = -0.24\\\\(a \nabla b) \nabla c = -0.4[/tex]

They don't match up, so [tex]a \nabla (b \nabla c) \ne (a \nabla b) \nabla c[/tex] when (a,b,c) = (1,2,3).

In general, the operation is not associative in R.