Answer:i think it is true but im not sure
Explanation:
The assertion is false that Ruler Agamemnon killed his cousin and wedded his widow as a ruin of war.
In Greek folklore and the legendary sonnet "The Iliad," Lord Agamemnon was not engaged with killing his cousin or wedding his cousin's widow as a ruin of war. Agamemnon was the lord of Mycenae and the sibling of Menelaus, who was hitched to Helen.
Agamemnon's story essentially spins around his job as the head of the Greek powers during the Trojan Conflict and the ensuing occasions that occurred upon his return from Troy, including his appalling demise because of his better half Clytemnestra and her darling Aegisthus. There is no notice of him killing his cousin or wedding his cousin's widow in the Greek fantasies or "The Iliad."
Learn more about Agamemnon, from:
brainly.com/question/23802770
#SPJ7
Compare the early Roman Empire to the empire conquered by Alexander the Great. Why did the Roman Empire hold together for so much longer than Alexander's?
The Answer is:
Alexander’s troops had much protection on their head and chest. This could be because their troops were more valuable and not as replaceable as the Romans who also had protective armor but not as heavy. The Romans carried more light armor for better mobility. To the Romans speed was more important than defense. They did not fight like a unit as much as the Alexandrians did, it was more stagnant and vicious.
Explanation:
I hope this answers your question.
3. (05.01B MC)
Which of the following correctly describes the relationship between Native American tribes and the United States government in the early 1800s? (3 points)
The relationship strengthened as Native American tribes agreed with the terms of each treaty.
The relationship weakened as the division of land created ongoing disagreement.
The relationship strengthened as the United States gained access to millions of acres of land.
The relationship weakened as Native American tribes gave up all of the land they previously claimed.
DELl
Native American and U.S. government relationship in the early 1800s was such that The relationship weakened as the division of land created ongoing disagreement.
why did the U.S. government have a bad relationship with Natives?the U.S. government and Native Americans were constantly in conflict in the early 1800s due to land issues.
the U.S. government was trying to divide the land such that White Americans would get more land at the expense of Natives and so conflict broke out.
find out more on Native American land conflict at https://brainly.com/question/2014771.
#SPJ1
Who is the permanent salaried employee of the Panchayat Samiti in India
Answer:
Explanation:
Panchayat samiti (also known as Block Development Councils, Kshetra panchayat, Mandal panchayat, Taluka panchayat) are rural local governments (panchayats) at the intermediate level in panchayat raj institutions (PRI).
Why did political and military leaders want the United States to expand into
the Pacific?
A. In order to establish military bases to protect United States
interests
B. In order to make money in Pacific territories and nations
C. In order to spread Christianity
D. In order to introduce American culture and civilization to Asian and
Pacific Islanders
The Reason why Political and military leaders wanted an expansion is : In order to establish military bases to protect United States interests ( A )
The purpose of establishing military bases in the pacific
The military leaders wanted the expansion of the United states to establish military bases in order to protect the interest of the united states in the international communities, and the territories of the United states from foreign attacks.
Hence we can conclude that The Reason why Political and military leaders wanted an expansion is in order to establish military bases to protect United States interests.
Learn more about function of military bases : https://brainly.com/question/23332280
#SPJ1
5. How did Pennsylvania avoid conflict with the
Indians?
Answer:
Pennsylvania’s government responded by instituting scalp bounties that encouraged indiscriminate reprisals against any Indians within the colony’s borders.
Explanation:
With regard to his economic dealings with them, William Penn showed the Native Americans respect. His descendants were the ones that tipped the wagon (so to speak). There weren't many nice men in history, but William Penn was one of them.
Note that the English Crown set the restrictions on Penn's donation. Penn was not required to buy any land from the local Native Americans.
Most Native Land was acquired or transferred through treaties. The fact that the value of the lands turned out to be substantially higher than what we can now envisage does not imply that the land agreements involved theft or deception.
In the 17th century, William Penn bought a large portion of the Delaware Valley from that country in good faith, but his family did not settle on the majority of the property during his lifetime. When none of the original parties was still alive in 1737, his successors made the decision to learn the full nature of the acquisition. Furthermore, it is obvious that they misinterpreted the agreement's language in order to extract considerably more than the Delaware believed was intended. The Penns employed three runners to make the most of the measurement rather than making a day's journey into the forest to ascertain the amount of land ceded. Little of the tribe's original holdings in the valley was still there. The Walking Purchase was what they termed it.
In order to appease the Native Americans who were not a part of the earlier agreements, the Moravians in Pennsylvania paid for their property numerous times (to various tribes who arrived after the event). However, a large number of the German and Scots-Irish immigrants who came at a later stage in the land purchase process and with little resources migrated through the settled regions to the frontier where they essentially squatted on the property. Two out of every three acres that were occupied on the borderlands were reportedly held without any legal rights other than the modifications that had been done to them.
Many settlers abandoned the practice of surveying their land claims in the middle of the 18th century out of disdain for the schemes of the various land companies, agents, and politicians. Instead, they simply marked boundaries themselves by notching trees or building piles of stones at the corners of boundaries. Whites continued to draw borders for purchases and land grants using Indian pathways and streambeds, which occasionally caused issues in later years when determining the proper bounds of ownership between parties with competing legal interests. This ad hoc system of property division was riddled with errors and contradictory claims, making it difficult and expensive to prove land ownership after the Revolution.
isefsefsefesfsfsfsefesfsfsefsefsefesfesfesf
Answer:
isefsefsefesfsfsfsefesfsfsefsefsefesfesfesf
Explanation:
isefsefsefesfsfsfsefesfsfsefsefsefesfesfesf
In colonial america enslaved workers who received manumission
The enslaved workers that received manumission were freed by slave owners in the colonial America.
What is a Manumission?This refers to process of freeing a slave after they became a freedman.
Because the slave rendered favors, merits, personal qualities to the owner, he could become a freedman.
Therefore, the enslaved workers that received manumission were freed by slave owners in the colonial America.
Read more about Manumission
brainly.com/question/1116729
#SPJ1
Why did the Soviet government's transition to collectivization result in widespread starvation?
Answer:
Peasants were not allowed to keep food until they met government quotas.
What was a major consequence of the encomienda system used in Spain's Central and South American colonies?
The major consequence of the encomienda system used in Spain's Central and South American colonies was that Spanish colonists grew wealthy by subjecting indigenous peoples to lives of forced labor.
Encomienda was a proper system of forced labor in Spanish colonies in geographical area and therefore the Philippines, supposed to encourage conquest and organization.
In this method, leaders of the endemic community paid tribute to colonists with food, cloth, minerals, or by providing laborers.
They benefited from the invention of gold and silver within the New World, and also the mining of these metals by their laborers. The system resulted within the widespread abuse of autochthonous peoples, still because the thieving of their land.
It conjointly fleetly LED to abuses: encomenderos created unreasonable demands of the Native Peruvians UN agency lived on their lands, operating them overly or demanding tribute of crops that would not be adult on the land. These issues appeared quickly.
Learn more about encomienda system here: https://brainly.com/question/2027432
#SPJ10
During the 1960s, some civil rights leaders had different views on combating racial injustice.
It is a true statement that some civil rights leaders had different views on combating racial injustice.
What was the racial injustice in 1960s?The African-Americans faced a racial discrimination in their daily lives and in voting practices which the Federal civil right Act and Voting right Act prohibited.
However, the social activist of the civil rights had different views on combating racial injustice which was provided to the government.
Therefore, it is a true statement.
Read more about racial injustice
brainly.com/question/1687063
#SPJ1
Considering how Texas Democrats changed between Reconstruction and the 1950s, how did "liberal" and "conservative" values affect the divides within the "one party" state? What other factors helped to transform mid-century politics in Texas?
Industrialization hugely impacted Texas and transformed its activities. The majority of the population shifted to the urban areas to look for better sources of income.
How did Texas Society extrade in the twentieth century?A large number of adjustments occurred withinside the state of Texas in the second half of the twentieth century which consisted of social and demographic, financial and industrial, and political.
The Texan populace shifted from rural to city facilities because of the end result of industrialization.
Thus, Industrialization hugely impacted Texas and transformed its activities. The majority of the population shifted to the urban areas to earn better sources of income.
learn more about Texas Society during twentieth century:
https://brainly.com/question/19671070
#SPJ1
that explains how Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison tried to solve the problems facing America between 1789 and 1816. Discuss the ways in which their efforts led to the formation of different political parties .
A discuss of the ways in which the efforts of the founding fathers led to the formation of different polititcal parties is given thus:
While some of the political fathers who wanted a commercial society opted for a federal government, those in favor of an agrarian society became anti-federalists. The former gave rise to the Jeffersonian-Republican Party.How did the different political parties begin to form?The founding fathers had different ideologies on how the national debt and general economy should be paid and run. Some wanted power at the center while others wanted the states to have the power.
This gave rise to the two major federalists and anti-federalists who also went ahead to form their own polititcal parties.
Learn more about the political parties of the founding fathers here:
https://brainly.com/question/13373357
#SPJ1
What is Title IX and how does it support you as a GCU student?
In which of these ways is Islam similar to both Christianity and Judaism?
Which of the following was Warren Harding's initial plan for helping the US economy?
A. Decrease public spending, decrease taxes
B. Increase public spending, decrease taxes
C. Decrease public spending, increase taxes
D. Increase public spending, increase taxes
The statement that was Warren Harding's initial plan for helping the US economy is option C. Decrease public spending, increase taxes. Read below about Warren Harding.
Who is Warren Harding?Warren Gamaliel Harding was the 29th president of the United States, serving from 1921 until his death in 1923. A member of the Republican Party, he was one of the most popular sitting U.S. presidents.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above. Option C. Decrease public spending, increase taxes.
learn more about Warren Harding: https://brainly.com/question/1291396
#SPJ1
Which of the following was one of the primary causes of World War I?
A)a complex set of alliances among European nations
B)exile of Mexican General Victoriano Huerta
C)the dissatisfaction of Russian peasants
D)the breakup of the Austro-Hungarian Empire
What happened to World War I veterans because of the stock market crash?
OA. They did not get the pensions they had been promised.
OB. They were given bonuses by the government to help the economy-
C. They were expected to repay the pensions they had received.
D. They could not get their bonuses when they needed them.
SUBMIT
The length of a picture is 10.5cm and the diagonal is 18.2cm . What width must have to meet a right angle ?
I decide: the length and diagonal are given. Find the width of the rectangle.
Given: a=10.5 cm; c=18.2 cm; α=90°(rectangle); b-?
------------
By T. Pythagoras
c²=a² + b²
b²=c²-a²
b=√(c²-a²)=√(c-a)(c+a)=
√(18.2 - 10.5)(18.2 + 10.5)=
√(7.7 * 28.7)=√(7*1.1 * 7*4.1)=7√4.51≈14.8657≈14.87 cm is the answer.
14cm 8.7mm.
.
Explain in 200 words: What impact did the Dred Scott v Sandford decision have on slavery?
The impact that the Dred Scott v Sandford decision have on slavery is that the court struck down the Missouri Compromise and cease the congress power to end slavery.
How did Dred Scott v Sandford decision influence slavery ?The U.S. Supreme Court's that was on Dred Scott case were able to declare that the congress cannot forbid slavery.
They did this by strucking down the Missouri Compromise.
Learn more about Dred Scott v Sandford decision at:
https://brainly.com/question/305594
#SPJ1
One of Rome's greatest contributions to civilization is the
a. Justinian Code.
C.
b. Napoleonic Code.
d.
Code of Hammurabi.
common law.
Answer:
A) Justinian Code
Explanation:
The Civil Law, Common Law, or Islamic Law are the three main sources of law in the world today.
Roman Law served as the foundation for the Civil Law. Law was viewed as personal rather than territorial in the defunct Western Empire. Thus, during the rule of the germanic monarchs, "vulgar roman law" continued in Italy where Italians were still ostensibly subject to the same rules. According to Gratian's work, Canon Law had a significant role in the formation of the Civil Law, which also drew on Roman Law for its principles and practices.
But the Digest—the bulk of Justinian's Code—was crucial to the Civil Law. The Digest was found in Italy and extensively studied by the University of Bologna's Glossators, who later inspired other generations of academics throughout Europe and Italy. Though they are frequently criticized for having created a relatively ahistorical vision of the law, the academics endeavored to resolve contradictions, to defend existing practices, and to recreate the language and intellectual background of the Digest.
The Digest-derived law was adopted into national law from European universities. It was formally promulgated in the HRE. It was supposed that it was still in force elsewhere. Others embraced it without any kind of express enactment and viewed it as "learned law." More information about this subject may be found in just about any book on the development of law in Europe (or a specific European nation).
The scholastics and later humanist and natural law philosophers also embraced the Digest-related studies. The authors of Latin treatises like Pufendorf and Grotius—two titans of international law—clearly carry on the Digest's legacy. The Latin authors are followed by treatise authors in various national languages. It takes just a short detour from the final French writers in the natural law tradition to the French Civil Code, which enacts their works.
The rest of Europe also adopts laws in the century that follows the adoption of the French Civil Code. A few are taken straight from the French Code. Some are a blend, including aspects of regional law and local romanistic heritage.
Later, Japan adopted the Civil Law, which also served as the foundation for the Communist legal systems.
Less directly, the Digest has an impact on common law. The Inns of Court in England, who were supporters of the traditional legal system, which had developed in a way that (at least procedurally) more closely resembled the classical Roman Law than the more imperial version that Tribonian would have known, controlled a large portion of the country's legal system. Although the "learned law" was not acknowledged in English courts, English colleges would have provided teaching in it.
But Justinian's Code did have an impact. Bracton, Coke, Hale, and other English treatise authors have obviously studied the code or read authors who have. Similar sections in Justinian serve as the inspiration for important passages in these English writers that discuss the sources and goals of law. Even if the substance of these works are occasionally very diverse, the arrangement of them does appear to be derived from the code.
It is also clear that English law would borrow concepts from the European jus commune (the nascent Civil Law) sometimes awkwardly. For instance, English law lacks the all-important distinction between ownership and possession found in Roman law -- possession in English law is a practical concept (you have it) not a technical one. Thus, when English law borrows Roman property law (which was quite sophisticated) it must sometimes create strange kludges. English law also lacked the elegance of Roman law with respect to easements, and has really only settled at the same point as the Digest in the past few decades.
My knowledge skips a few centuries at this point, but by the time we get to America, common lawyers are citing "the Civil Law" frequently, and what they mean by this is a very influential translation of Justinian's Institutes (not the Digest). The Institutes were particularly seen as relevant in the context of the American law of slavery, because English law lacked a suitable antecedent. But even in more mundane cases, Justinian is cited, and during the 19th century it would be easy to purchase a copy of the Institutes with footnotes to American decisions, just as one could purchase many abridgments of Blackstone with footnotes to American decisions.
What was the most conspicuous shift from the Medieval to the Italian Renaissance mentality?
The most conspicuous shift was seen in the ways that the perspectives and the worldview of people changed in Europe.
What was the Renaissance?This was the period in Europe that was seen to have created a shift in the way people did things and how they thought. The movement first started in Florence in Italy.
During this period, people started to have new ideas, new beliefs and they were changed on how to do things.
Read more on the renaissance here:
https://brainly.com/question/879750
#SPJ1
Oligopolies compete on a non-price basis by
Your answer:
O colluding with their competition
Okeeping their cost of production low
emphasizing new or different features
offer discount coupons
Oligopolies compete on a non-price basis by colluding with their competition. Hence, Option A is correct.
What is oligopoly?A competition with a limited state, in which a small number of producers and sellers share a market. It is an industry which is dominated by sellers or producers, in a desire to maximise their profit. Such a structure leads to collusion between companies.
The major reason behind its existence is collaboration. For more economic profit, companies collaborate on a specific price, and after that, they also compete with their competitors.
Therefore, oligopolies compete on a non-price basis by colluding with their competition. Hence, Option A is correct.
Learn more about oligopoly form here:
https://brainly.com/question/14285126
#SPJ1
which activity was not a traditional role women in early civilizations were generally expected to fulfill
Women in early civilizations were generally not expected to : Hold leadership roles
Women roles in early civilizationsDuring early civilizations Women were not allowed to participate or hold leadership roles.but were confined to performing traditional domestic roles such as cleaning, washing, caring for children at home and for commercial purposes as well.
Women were generally not allowed to participate in politics or hold leadership positions in the society .
Hence we can conclude that Women in early civilizations were generally not expected to : Hold leadership roles
Learn more about women roles in early civilizations : https://brainly.com/question/21668448
#SPJ1
Match the various denominations of Protestantism to their respective descriptions.
The various denominations of Protestantism to their respective descriptions as:
Calvinism: developed in Switzerland with a central belief in predestination. Anabaptist: did not believe that infants should be baptized.Presbyterianism :originated in Scotland; gets its name from a formof church government.Anglican- started in England when Henry VIII broke from the Catholic ChurchWhat is Protestantism?Protestantism serves as a kind of Christianity which was a movement against the errors in the Catholic Church.
It was a movement of 16th-century and all the terms were been defined upward.
Learn more about denominations of Protestantism at:
https://brainly.com/question/2825780
#SPJ1
A business based in China pay for consultant and the US 572,000 yaun per year assume that the conversion is one yaun to 0.14 dollars what is the consultant salary and dollars per month
Based on the salary of the business in China per year, the consultant's salary in dollars per month is $6,673.33.
What is the income of the consultant?First, find the yearly pay in dollars:
= 572,000 x 0.14
= $80,080
The monthly salary is:
= 80,080 / 12
= $6,673.33
In conclusion, the consultant's salary per month is $6,673.33.
Find out more questions on currency conversion at https://brainly.com/question/2202418.
#SPJ1
Who argued for a separation of church and state?
Answer: Thomas Jefferson.
Explanation: The most famous use of the metaphor was by Thomas Jefferson in his 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptist Association. In it, Jefferson declared that when the American people adopted the establishment clause they built a “wall of separation between the church and state.”
Hope this helped. if you have questions comment them and ill answer quickly. Please mark brainliest!
the supreme courts ability to interpret the constitution is called
Answer:
judicial review
Explanation:
jdcal review power of the court of a country to examine the actions of the legglycelative exclutive and as minister of the Government and determined various such options are consists constitution
Someone please help me with this question?
D. Demonstrations supporting freedom
The Tiananmen Square was a protest in support of political and economic reform.
The fall of the Berlin Wall symbolized the end of communism in Europe and unification.
Nelson Mandela sought out to end apartheid in South Africa.
Why was the first Battle of the Mame Considered so significant?
Answer:
The first Battle of the Marne considered so important, because it flourished in driving the Germans back for a distance of 40 to 50 miles and therefore kept the capital city of Paris from capture.
I hope this helps, L.E.
Also it was the first battle of Marne not Mame
What actions of the political systems of Europe led to further revolutions in the 1830’s
The desire of certain European elites to establish a new global order dates back many centuries.
Adam Weishaupt established the Illuminati in 1776 in an effort to unite several freemasonic organizations by persuading the ruling class. Despite being outlawed after its initial triumph, it continued to operate under the Legaue of the Justes. Karl Marx believed that instead of going after the elites, going after the mobs would be more successful since they are willing to perform filthy work as well. The goal of the wave of revolutions was to overthrow the whole European nobility, outlaw the church, and establish a new culture for a new population.