I need help with this question ASAP!

Answer:

ok so first you got to wait All the faith he had had had had no effect on the outcome of his life. ...

2 One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. ...

3 The complex houses married and single soldiers and their families. ...

4 The man the professor the student has studies Rome.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It is a fraction -5/9

Step-by-step explanation:

don't worry i help you now

Step-by-step explanation:  Let's come up with points that would be on the graph of a str. line:

(0, 1/4), (1, 1 1/12), (2, 1 11/12), (and so on).

Assume that this is a line, a str. line, and not a curve.  

The slope of this line is

       1 11/12 - 1 1/12

m = ------------------------ = 10/12, or 5/6.

              2 - 1

We now have the slope and y-intercept:  slope = m = 5/6; intercept = 1/4.

The line is then    y = (5/6)x + 1/4.

To answer this question, substitute 4 for x and calculate y:

  y = (5/6)(4) + 1/4 = 20/6 + 1/4   =  40/12 + 3/12   =   43/12 inches.

That's 3 7/12 inches.

i think that may help you  

Answer:

15/2

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it helps (•‿•)

Answer:

x= 5 ........................ .......

Answer:

These techniques for elimination are preferred for 3rd order systems and higher.  They use "Row-Reduction" techniques/pivoting and many subtle math tricks to reduce a matrix to either a solvable form or perhaps provide an inverse of a matrix (A-1)of linear equation AX=b.  Solving systems of linear equations (n>2) by elimination is a topic unto itself and is the preferred method.  As the system of equations increases, the "condition" of a matrix becomes extremely important.  Some of this may sound completely alien to you.  Don't worry about these topics until Linear Algebra when systems of linear equations (Rank 'n')  become larger than 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

Just to add a bit more information, "Elimination" Can have a variety of other interpretations.  Elimination techniques typically refer to 'row reduction' to achieve 'row echelon form.'  Do not worry if you have not heard of these terms.  They are used in Linear Algebra when referring to "Elimination techniques"

Gaussian Elimination

Gauss-Jordan Elimination

LU-Decomposition

QR-Decomposition

These techniques for elimination are preferred for 3rd order systems and higher.  They use "Row-Reduction" techniques/pivoting and many subtle math tricks to reduce a matrix to either a solvable form or perhaps provide an inverse of a matrix (A-1)of linear equation AX=b.  Solving systems of linear equations (n>2) by elimination is a topic unto itself and is the preferred method.  As the system of equations increases, the "condition" of a matrix becomes extremely important.  Some of this may sound completely alien to you.  Don't worry about these topics until Linear Algebra when systems of linear equations (Rank 'n')  become larger than 2.

Substitution is the preferred method for 2 equations in 2 unknowns.  The constants are unimportant other than having a non-zero determinant.  It is always easy to find multiplicative factors using LCMs of one variable or the other to allow substitution into the other equation:

Example:

4X + 5Y = 9

5X -  4Y = 1

Notice that 20 is a LCM of either the X or Y variable.  So multiply the first by 4 and the second by 5 and then adding the two (Y's will drop out allowing for substitution)

4(4X + 5Y = 9)

5(5X -  4Y = 1)  

Multiplying to produce the LCM factors:

16X + 20Y = 36

25X -  20Y = 5

Adding the equations

41X = 41

X = 1

Substitution into either equation yields

Y = 1

Elimination techniques are preferred for Rank-n>3

Answer:

I like the view

Based on the right application of the reflexive property and subtraction property of equality, the table that correctly lists the reasons to prove that m∠1 ≅ m∠3 is: the table in option B (See attachment below).

The reflexive property of equality states that:

a + b = a + b.

Since m∠1 + m∠2 = 180°, and m∠2 + m∠3 = 180°, therefore, based on the reflexive property, we would have:

m∠1 + m∠2 = m∠2 + m∠3.

Thus, subtracting m∠2 from both sides of the equation will leave us with: m∠1 = m∠3 (subtraction property of equality).

Learn more about the reflexive property on:

https://brainly.com/question/1601404

Answer:

slope = 3/7 or 0.43

Step-by-step explanation:

use the slope(gradient) formula

Answer:

If you reflect over the line y = -x, the x-coordinate and y-coordinate change places and are negated (the signs are changed).

Step-by-step explanation:

Since you didn't provide an image of the polygon I can't give you a direct answer but this is how you do it.

Answer:

  A:  HL

Step-by-step explanation:

The hypotenuses of these right triangles are marked congruent.

One leg of these right triangles is marked congruent.

The HL theorem applies.

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

The hypotenuses of these right triangles are marked congruent.

One leg of these right triangles is marked congruent.

The HL theorem applies.

Answer:

35

Step-by-step explanation:

10 - (-20) turns into 10+20 and 8+(-3) is just 8-3

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

remove brackets

8-3+10+20=35

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

Using points (0,0) and (2,4)

slope= (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)

= (4-0)/(2-0)

= 4/2

= 2

Answer:

f(x) = |x - 3| - 0.5.

Step-by-step explanation:

).5 units down gives |x| - 0.5

3 units to the left gives |x + 3| - 0.5

Reflection over the y-axis gives |x - 3| - 0.5.

Answer:

-23.33 °C

Step-by-step explanation:

C = 5/9 (-10 - 32)

C = 5/9 (-42)

C = -23.3333 ≈ -23.33 °C

hope it helps :)

mark brainliest!

Answer:

3 scoops

Step-by-step explanation:

If the bird feeder holds 1/2 cup, and Maya is filling it with a scoop that holds 1/6 cup of birdseed, then Maya will need 3 scoops of the 1/6 cup scoop.

1/6 + 1/6 + 1/6

= 3/6

= 1/2

The correct roots of the equation are (a) 9 and 1

From the complete question, their mistakes are:

Anu

Aji

A quadratic equation is represented as:

[tex]ax^2 + bx + c = 0[/tex]

Where:

[tex]\alpha\beta = \frac ca[/tex] --- product of roots

[tex]\alpha + \beta = -\frac ba[/tex] --- sum of roots

Anu made a mistake in the constant term, so we consider the sum of roots

[tex]Sum = 8 + 2[/tex]

[tex]Sum = 10[/tex]

Aji made a mistake in the coefficient, so we consider the product of roots

[tex]Product = -9 \times -1[/tex]

[tex]Product = 9[/tex]

The possible equations from the above sum and products are:

Of all the above equations, the most likely equation is [tex]x^2 - 10x + 9 =0[/tex], and it has a root of 9 and 1

Hence, the correct roots are (a) 9 and 1

Read more about roots of equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/3923172

Answer:

THANK U!

FOR THE TIP.

HAVE A GREAT DAY!

Answer:

29

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

29

Step-by-step explanation:

29-28=1

1+28=29

29+11=40

40-11=29

Thank you for this challenge that was half the challenge of a challenge........

Better hope you stay up long enough to see the animatronics. :)

Answer:

option 4

Step-by-step explanation:

(y intercept and negative slope)

The value of f.ds = 20π.

The quantity of electric or magnetic field lines that flow across a surface in a specific period of time is known as flux. Field lines offer a way to visualise the size and direction of the field under study.

Given:

f = <3xy²,3x²y,z³>

Using Divergence Theorem

P= 3xy²

Q= 3x²y

R = z³

So, dP/ dx= 3y²

dQ/ dy = 3x²

dQ/ dz = 3z²

So, [tex]\int\limits\int\limits\int\limits dV[/tex]= [tex]\int\limits\int\limits\int\limits (dP/ dx + dQ/dy+ dR/dz)[/tex]

= [tex]\int\limits\int\limits\int\limits[/tex] (3y² + 3x² + 3z²)

= [tex]\int\limits\int\limits\int\limits[/tex] 3 (y² + x² + z²)

Since the radius is 5.

= [tex]\int\limits\int\limits\int\limits[/tex] 3(5)

= 15 [tex]\int\limits\int\limits\int\limits[/tex] dV

= 15 (4/3)π

= 20π

Learn more about flux here:

https://brainly.com/question/14527109

#SPJ5

Answer:

9log_b(u)+4log_b(v)

should be like that. let me know if iam wrong

Answer:

5x + 8y = 24

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply the equation 8

8 ( y = -5x/8 + 3 )

8y = -5x + 24

5x + 8y = 24

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a. no. 9 x 15 = 135, so if she sells more than 15 necklaces, she'll make a profit

b. 50n > 135 + 4.50n

Answer:

∠DAB=140

∠BAC=60

∠EBF=40

∠ACB=80

∠BCG=100

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

well i dont know this sorry

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2 solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

2 solutions

3/4 - i[tex]\sqrt{47}[/tex]/4

3/4 + i[tex]\sqrt{47}[/tex]/4

Part A: The system of equations to shows each person's subscribers is:

S  =  100  +  8x

A  =  220  +  3x

Part B: Sam and Alex will have the same number of subscribers after 24 weeks

Part C: Sam and Alex will have 292 subscribers when their subscriber count is equal

Let the number of weeks be x

The initial number of followers that Sam has = 100

Sam gains 8 subscribers every week

Let the total number of subscribers that Sam has be S

The equation that represents Sam's total subscribers is:

S    =   100  +   8x..................(1)

The initial number of followers that Alex has = 220

Alex gains 8 subscribers every week

Let the total number of Alex's subscribers be A

A  =  220  +  3x....................(2)

If Sam and Alex have the same number of subscribers:

S   =   A

100 + 8x  =  220  +  3x

8x  -  3x   =   220   -  100

5x    =   120

x   =  120/5

x   =   24

Sam and Alex will have the same number of subscribers after 24 weeks

To find the number of subscribers that Sam and Alex will have when their subscriber count is equal, substitute x = 24 into equation (1)

S = 100 + 8x

S  =  100  +  8(24)

S  =   292

Sam and Alex will have 292 subscribers when their subscriber count is equal

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/25898415