Answer:
the rivers don't connect
Explanation:
Which statement best compares these two loans?
Loan A
Loan B
Loan
amount
$15,000
$10,000
The annual percentage rate for loan A is higher
than the rate for loan B.
The interest for loans A and B will cost the borrower
the same amount over time.
The interest is about half the principal for A and
almost equal to the principal for B.
The total payment for A is higher than for B, even
though the principal is actually lower.
APR
17%
19%
Loan
repayment
term
5 years
5 years
Total
interest
paid
$7,367.32
$9.857.02
Done
Answer: The answer should be:
C: The interest is about half the principal for A and almost equal to the principal for B.
Explanation:
Edge 2023
Hope this helps! (^_^)
Which are characteristics of flukes? Check all that apply.
A They are free living.
B They are a type of flatworm.
C They reproduce sexually.
D They have eyespots.
E They are segmented.
Answer:
A, B, C and D
Explanation:
All are characteristics of flukes except the segmented body. They do not have true ceolum
Answer:
B and C
Explanation:
A researcher developing scanners to search for hidden weapons at airports has that a new scanner is significantly better than the current scanner. He made his decision based on a test using Would he have made the same decision at How about Explain.
Answer:
The test statistic will also be smaller α= 0.20 as α= 0.20 > α= 0.025 and the decision will be the same.
Explanation:
As when the default position has always been substantially the very same, in other words, this same innovative scanner, as well as the contemporary scanner, were also substantially similar, as well as the alternative explanation would not be considered the very same. This same conclusion was always that the latest scanner wasn't substantially superior to the current scanning machine, which means that perhaps the null hypothesis would be accepted, i.e. the confidence interval is shorter unlike "α=0.025" and therefore the alternative hypothesis would be turned down.What role did Alexander Stephens play in Georgia’s history?
Answer:
Stephens played a key role in passage of the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Bill of 1854. Speaking at Georgia’s secession convention after the election of Abraham Lincoln (a personal friend of Stephens), Stephens argued vehemently against secession, pointing out that no actual violations of states’ rights had yet occurred.
Explanation:
Hope it helps U-U
The Virginia Plan gave equal representation to all states in Congress, which
favored small states. The New Jersey Plan based representation on
populationſ favoring large states.
True or false?
Answer: False
Explanation: The Connecticut Compromise established a bicameral legislature with the U.S. House of Representatives apportioned by population as desired by the Virginia Plan and the Senate granted equal votes per state as desired by the New Jersey Plan.
What was the name of Salva's village?
Group of answer choices
Loun-Ariik
Loun-Derrick
Sudan
Answer:
Correct answer is Loun-Ariik .
Explanation:
Sudan is not correct answer, as this is the name of the country, not village Salva was from.
Salva was born in the village Loun-Ariik, and together with a lot of other boys escaped from the village in 1985. He was even their leader.
Option Loun-Derrick is not correct as I have never heard about the mentioned place.
Which of the following tasks would NOT be a role played by a political party’s state committee leader?
A.
running state headquarters
B.
supervising party campaigns statewide
C.
organizing volunteers in the precinct
D.
facilitating primary elections
C.) is the correct answer for this question
Answer:
c
Explanation:
on edge 2021
The bitterly contested presidential election of 1800 was a rematch of the election of 1796. The incumbent Federalist president _____________ran against__________, a Republican. The result of the election was a tie in the Electoral College, which caused the outcome to be decided in___________ .
Answer:
The bitterly contested presidential election of 1800 was a rematch of the election of 1796. The incumbent Federalist president John Adams ran against Thomas Jefferson, a Republican. The result of the election was a tie in the Electoral College, which caused the outcome to be decided in the House of Representatives.
Explanation:
In the presidential election held in 1800, the Federalist Adams ran against the Republican Thomas Jefferson. The result of the election was a tie, which had to be resolved by the House of Representatives, under Federalist control at the time. 36 ballots were effectuated before resolving Jefferson would be the president, with Aaron Burr as his vice president.
Answer: John adams
Thomas Jefferson
The House of Representatives
Explanation:
2. Why is the Middle East also called Southwest Asia/North Africa?
I
eaker notes
Answer:
cuz
Explanation:
"The Middle East is the common term for a region consisting of countries in southwest Asia and, usually, at least part of North Africa. … It was originally used to distinguish the area east of the Near East – the Balkans and the Ottoman Empire – and west of India."
What was President Woodrow Wilson’s campaign slogan? Why is this ironic?
Answer:
"He kept us out of war."
Explanation:
In the Presidential Election of 1916, President Woodrow Wilson campaign slogan was, "He kept us out of the war." He narrowly won the election and was the Democratic candidate. His slogan meant that America will not enter into World War I in Europe. Ironically, a few months before the United States entered World War I.
How did geography shape the Greek population?
First, state your claim, then support your claim with two pieces of evidence from the following sources (only need two pieces of evidence total and they can come from any of the following three sources), then finish your argument with your reasoning (which can be done in one or two sentences). You can use sentence starters for Claim, Evidence and Reasoning; Make sure your answer is between 3-5 sentences.I know this is a lot but pls help!!!! i will give brainlyest
Answer:
How did geography shape the Greek population?
First, state your claim, then support your claim with two pieces of evidence from the following sources (only need two pieces of evidence total and they can come from any of the following three sources), then finish your argument with your reasoning (which can be done in one or two sentences). You can use sentence starters for Claim, Evidence and Reasoning; Make sure your answer is between 3-5 sentences.I know this is a lot but pls help!!!! i will give brainlyest
What is an ecosystem?
Answer: An ecosystem is a community of living organisms living with the nonliving components of their environment, interacting as a system. These biotic and abiotic components are linked together through nutrient cycles and energy flows.
Explanation:
Help ASAP pls im being timed pls help
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I beleive it is C since Lincoln was a WHig member
Which statement best describes the role of dialogue in this excerpt?
A. It introduces the character of the miller
B. It moves the story forward and introduces the conflict.
C. it introduces the character of the miller's daughter.
D. It tells how the miller and his daughter plan to trick the king.
Answer:
What is the excerpt.. I can't help unless I have the information
Answer:
its b) It moves the story forward and introduces the conflict.
yw everyone stay safe
Carolyn is a server at an Olive Garden restaurant and enjoys meeting new people who dine at the restaurant. Recently, an elderly couple visited, and Carolyn overheard them talking about their financial struggles. They asked Carolyn for refills of salad and extra breadsticks that they could take home with them. Carolyn agreed even though it was against corporate policy. What Carolyn exhibited conforms to the ethical theory of _______. a. act utilitarianism b. moral relativism c. casuist ethical theory d. rule utilitarianism
Answer:
a. act utilitarianism
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about Carolyn who is a server at an Olive Garden restaurant and enjoys meeting new people who dine at the restaurant. Recently, an elderly couple visited, and Carolyn overheard them talking about their financial struggles. They asked Carolyn for refills of salad and extra breadsticks that they could take home with them. Carolyn agreed even though it was against corporate policy. In this case, Carolyn has exhibited conforms to the ethical theory of act utilitarianism.
Act of Utilitarianism can be regarded as theory of morality which explain that
overall happiness could be recorded in the world through carrying out charity work. It is an act that advocates action that beget happiness as well as pleasure, it always any action that can bring unhappiness or harm. It aim at betterment of society.
List the three models of power in America. In 250-350 words for each model, delineate the theory and give examples. Additionally, describe how each theory explains why unequal levels of power within society need to be maintained. Do you agree? why? Support your conclusions with research.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The three power models in America are:
The Pluralist model.
This model of power establishes that there are certain kinds of groups that have similar interests and they associate to form groups of power that exert some control in society and politics and want to open more spaces to favor their particular interests.
So as there are many groups that have their own interests, but at the same time these interests are different from the other groups, then power is divided into different groups. They legally form political associations, unions, political groups that hire lobbyists and try to negotiate with legislators to make laws that favor their interests.
The Elite Theory.
This theory established that power in a nation relies on the hands of few groups of people that are wealthy enough that it can control most part of the decisions in politics and the economy.
This small group could be aristocrats, businessmen, or political families that have been exerting their control in the past in a quite discrete way. They do not like to appear in mass media or be acknowledged as the ones in power. They prefer to be the men behind the curtain, influence all the decisions.
Other theory such as the social theory or the Marxist Theory, establish that power should be in the hands of people and there has to be not only one source of power but different ones that help to balance power and decisions in a society. These theories favor the incursion of common citizens to the political spheres to make decisions that really took the people's needs into consideration.
What did the Texas Declaration of Independence say?
Answer:
Explanation:
That declaration asked for Mexican statehood for Texas and vowed to make war until the Constitution of 1824, abrogated by the actions of President Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna, was restored
Answer:
Explanation:
The Texas Declaration of Independence says "the right of trial by jury, that palladium of civil liberty, and only safe guarantee for the life, liberty, and property of the citizen"
To what extend does our social class
background affects our life chance.
Answer:
A person's social class has a significant impact on their physical health, their ability to receive adequate medical care and nutrition, and their life expectancy.
1. What conclusion can be drawn about the constitutional amendment process when
comparing the U.S. and Florida?
a. A republican form of government is reinforced by citizen initiatives.
b. Direct democracy is more responsive than representative democracy.
c. Judicial review is supported by a formal process outlined in each document.
d. Proposals are less likely to be ratified at the state level than at the national level.
Answer:b. Direct democracy is more responsive than representative democracy.
Explanation:
Direct democracy is more responsive than representative democracy can be drawn about the constitutional amendment process when comparing the U.S. and Florida.
What is Direct democracy?Direct democracy, often known as pure democracy, is a type of democracy in which the people makes decisions regarding major policy matters without the assistance of elected officials.
This is distinct from representative democracies, which make up the majority of currently existing democracies.
In a representative democracy, people vote for representatives who subsequently enact policy proposals, whereas in a direct democracy, the people make policy decisions without the help of any intermediary or representation.
Direct democracy may involve drafting laws, using sortition, enacting executive orders, directly electing or removing officials, and holding trials, depending on the specific system being used.
Participatory democracy and deliberative democracy are two popular types of direct democracy. The political elites' proposed legislation is put to a binding public vote in a mandatory referendum.
Learn more about Direct democracy, here
https://brainly.com/question/11829914?
#SPJ6
How did the Columbian Exchange affect world trade patterns?
Explanation: the new things that they explored made a huge impact in the way things were and how it affected the natives
Answer:
How did the Columbian Exchange affect world trade patterns?The Columbian Exchange caused population growth in Europe by bringing new crops from the Americas and started Europe's economic shift towards capitalism. Colonization disrupted ecosytems, bringing in new organisms like pigs, while completely eliminating others like beavers.
More info below
How did the Columbian Exchange affect trade?
The Columbian Exchange transported plants, animals, diseases, technologies, and people one continent to another. Crops like tobacco, tomatoes, potatoes, corn, cacao, peanuts, and pumpkins went from the Americas to rest of the world. ... The triangular trade was the trade between Europe, Africa, and the Americas.
Explanation: I hope helped
>Please mark me brainliest
Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
Formal education, which involves instruction by specially trained teachers.
Answer:
Schooling
Explanation:
I took the test and got it correct.
The word from the list that best fits the definition of Formal education, which involves instruction by specially trained teachers, is schooling.
What do you mean by Formal Education?Formal education is based on a structure that runs from primary school to university and includes specialized programs for vocational, technical, and professional training.
Informal education is the system of learning that results from activities related to daily life experiences, work, household, or leisure.
Characteristics of formal education;
1. A structurally ad hoc curriculum.
2. Qualified teachers with authorization to teach the curriculum.
3. A judgment criterion (grading system)
4. Time-bound courses.
5. Involves regular fees.
Therefore, The word that best fits the definition of Formal education is schooling.
Learn more about Formal Education, here;
https://brainly.com/question/28221567
#SPJ6
Which of the following is an example of a negative relationship between an independent and a dependent variable?
a. Employees with more responsibility are less likely to miss work.
b. Employees with more responsibility are more likely to receive promotions.
c. Healthier employees are more likely to receive promotions.
d. Employees with lower incomes miss fewer days of work.
Answer: a. Employees with more responsibility are less likely to miss work.
Explanation:
An independent variable is the one which can be altered in the study the impact of which is observed on the dependent variable.
A negative relationship between the independent and dependent variable refers to the fact that when one variable increases the value of the other variable decreases.
Here, employees are associated with the responsibilities which is the independent variable if the responsibilities increase the chances of missing the work or taking leaves by the employees will also reduce. So one variable is negatively affecting the value of other. The chances of missing work or taking leaves is the dependent variable.
After reading about the Bistro 24 owner's horrible day, individually identify and rank what you believe to be the top 5 risks facing the restaurant on the Bistro 24 Discussion Board (link appears a bit later in the module). Post your ranking by starting a new thread. Make sure you also explain why you thought that event posed such a great risk of potential harm. After you do, you'll be able to see how other students ranked these risks and can select one or more to post a response to their rankings
Answer:
1. you could get shut down
2. your restaurant could get suspended
3. you could not get enough money to pay your coworkers
4. your not able to get enough
5. you don't get enough customers
Explanation:
Use your knowledge of the definitions of validity, soundness, strength, and cogency to determine which of the following statements are true. Check all that apply. A statement is either valid or invalid. If an inductive argument is weak, then the argument's premises cannot all be true. All valid deductive arguments are equally valid. If a deductive argument's premises are not all true, then you know that the argument must be unsound. If an inductive argument has true premises and a false conclusion, then the conclusion still could be strong, as long as the conclusion is unlikely to be false. An inductive argument cannot be both strong and uncogent. Some inductive arguments are stronger than others. A deductive argument cannot be both invalid and sound. In a cogent inductive argument, the conclusion is probably true. It is possible for an inductive argument to be both uncogent and strong. If the conclusion of a deductive argument is true, then you know that the argument is sound. Some inductive arguments are both strong and weak. If a deductive argument is unsound, then the argument's premises must all be false. In a valid deductive argument it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false simultaneously. A cogent argument that has a large degree of inductive strength could still have a conclusion that is actually false.
Answer:
The true statements are:
1. A statement is either valid or invalid.
False
2. If an inductive argument is weak, then the argument's premises cannot all be true.
True
3. All valid deductive arguments are equally valid.
True
4. If a deductive argument's premises are not all true, then you know that the argument must be unsound.
True
5. If an inductive argument has true premises and a false conclusion, then the conclusion still could be strong, as long as the conclusion is unlikely to be false.
False
5. An inductive argument cannot be both strong and uncogent.
True
6. Some inductive arguments are stronger than others.
True
7. A deductive argument cannot be both invalid and sound.
True
8. In a cogent inductive argument, the conclusion is probably true.
False
9. It is possible for an inductive argument to be both uncogent and strong.
False
10. If the conclusion of a deductive argument is true, then you know that the argument is sound.
True
11. Some inductive arguments are both strong and weak.
False
12. If a deductive argument is unsound, then the argument's premises must all be false.
True.
13. In a valid deductive argument it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false simultaneously.
True
14. A cogent argument that has a large degree of inductive strength could still have a conclusion that is actually false.
True
Explanation:
A statement is either true or untrue. A statement cannot be valid or invalid. Validity, soundness, strength, and cogency apply to arguments and not to statements. When one makes a valid argument, it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.
Christina recently adopted 12 cats. Her neighbors have begun to complain about the sound of the cats and the smell coming from her apartment. She goes to work every day but often comes home during her lunch hour to feed the cats. Does Christina meet criteria for having a mental disorder based on the DSM-5 definition. Why/why not?
a. Yes - because it is violating social norms
b. Yes - because it is causing personal distress
c. No - because it is a culturally specific reaction to an event
d. No - because it is not causing disability
Answer:
b. Yes - because it is causing personal distress
Explanation:
DSM - 5 is a standard classification of the mental disorder that is used by the mental health professionals in the U.S. DSM stands for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders. It is its 5th edition.
In the context, Christina had adopted 12 cats and she loves her cat very much. But her neighbors have been complaining about the foul smells and the sounds that are coming from her apartment. So Christina comes home every from work during her lunch time to check and feed the cat. It is causing a stress on her and she is constantly thinking about her cats and takes care of them.
Thus, according to DSM-5, Christina meets the criteria for developing a mental disorder which is based on DSM-5 standards as they are causing mental distress to Christina and she thinks about her cats all the time.
This religion is unique to Japan:
Answer: Shintoism
Explanation:
Why Dr.Seuss know for making mockery of people from other races
Which immigrant group worked in factories making pianos, glasses, and baby food
Answer:
German
Explanation:
i did a quiz same question and it was German
German immigrant groups worked in factories making pianos, glasses, and baby food.
What is immigration?Immigration is the process by which people move to another country to live permanently. Immigration has traditionally offered states significant social, economical, and cultural resources.
German immigrants worked as skilled workers in industries like jewelry production, woodwind instrument production, cabinet production, and tailoring. They also had jobs in bakeries, shops, and supermarkets. They were the ones who helped the german country with labor work.
The immigration process was a large process. The immigrant made a huge contribution to various factories. These factors included the making of pianos, and glasses as well as the huge production of baby food.
Learn more about immigrants, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29487746
#SPJ2
1. Sixteen-year-old Thomas is in a difficult position. He has been trying to break into the popular group at school, and now one of the members of the group has invited him to a party on Saturday. He really wants to go, but he has already volunteered to help his church youth group with an activity for first graders that night. In addition, he knows that there will be drinking at the party, and he has promised his mother that he would never drink in high school, and she trusts him. Predict what Thomas will do and explain his decision using Piaget's theory of cognitive development, Kohlberg's theory of morality, and Erikson's theory of identity formation.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Piaget's theory of cognitive development places the case of Thomas in the Formal Operation Stage, 12 years-old and up. In this state, Jean Piaget established that people are in a period of experimenting and learning. Swiss sociology Jean Piaget says that during this period, people experiment and learn through interacting with other people and different environments.
Kohlberg's theory of morality places Thomas in level 3 of his Theory: Postconventional Morality. Here, the author says that people understand the rules of morality and their consequences, including the respect for the dignity of all humans. It is an important ethic principle.
Erikson's theory of identity formation places Thomas on stage 5, Identity vs. Confusión. Here, the teenager is asking the question "who am I?" and tries to find a place in social groups.
Taking those theories into consideration it is understandable that Sixteen-year-old Thomas is in a difficult position. Trying to break into the popular group at school and he has been invited to a party on Saturday in one of the group's members' house.
Although he wants to go, he has some issues to resolve first because he has already volunteered to help his church youth group with an activity for first graders that night. In addition, he knows that there will be drinking at the party, and he has promised his mother that he would never drink in high school, and she trusts him.
After considering those above-mentioned theories, Thomas would spend a difficult time making a decision because he is confronted with his absolute desire to go to the party and be considered a member of that group, against the moral decision of promising his mother not to drink, plus his commitment to go do volunteering work.
Knowing that he is 16 and really wants to experiment and being recognized, he will attend the party, he will drink to be accepted, and he later will have to face the consequences.
Answer:
he wanted to be recognized
Why did colonel Barrett decide to confront the British regulars
Answer:
The Battle of Concord, in Massachusetts, marks the start of the Revolutionary War. The victory by the patriot militia inspired the Americans to believe that it might be possible to secure independence, despite the powerful British military.
The battle took place on April 19, 1775. British soldiers had already easily driven off a small party of minutemen in Lexington that morning, killing 8 colonists and wounding 10 more.
The minutemen had gathered in Lexington after Paul Revere’s midnight ride had warned them that “the British are coming.” By 2 a.m., Dr. Samuel Prescott had alerted Concord as well.
By morning, a party of British soldiers was marching on Concord. Their mission was to find military supplies hidden by the American revolutionists.
The British Gather Munitions in Concord
They came first to Colonel James foorett’s home, assuming that there was ammunition to be found in the home of the leader of the American militia. What they did not know was that Colonel foorett’s sons had previously plowed crops and buried the weapons there.
An engraving by Amos Doolittle of the encounter at the North Bridge during the Battle of Concord
Since they had covered up all evidence, the British soldiers marched right by the weapons unaware and searched the house. There, they demanded breakfast from the lady of the house. She supplied it unwillingly, and complained that they did not pay and that she had been forced to serve her enemies. Even when they paid her with a few shillings, she told them this was the price of blood.
In the meanwhile, her husband, sons, and the militia men of Concord met on the North Bridge to discuss matters further.
Other British parties resumed duties elsewhere.
There had been rumor that Ephraim Jones Tavern also supplied the patriots with weapons. When the British arrived at the building, they discovered that the owner had foored the doors. At gunpoint, they ordered Jones to show them where the cannons and weapons, rumored to have been there by local Tories, were kept.
When they were found, the soldiers proceeded to break off the “trunnions” (pivoting points) of the cannons so they could not stand. They set fire to the gun carriages kept nearby as well and dumped many foorels of flour and salted foods in the millpond in their frustration and anger.
Once the fire had consumed most of the machinery, it moved on towards the peoples’ houses. Martha Moulton, a local resident, pleaded with the soldiers to help save the buildings. Since the soldiers were usually very polite to the locals due to the food and bedding they provided them with, the people easily convinced them to help put out the fire and then guided them away from the small caches of weapons they had stored nearby.