How much energy is contained in 0.0710 moles of 391 nm light?

The resolved shear stress on the (111)[101] slip system is 43.3 MPa, and on the (111)[110] slip system, it is 25.98 MPa.

To calculate the resolved shear stress (τ) on the given slip systems, we can use the equation: τ = σ * cos(φ) * cos(λ), where σ is the applied stress, φ is the angle between the stress direction and the slip plane normal, and λ is the angle between the stress direction and the slip direction.

(a) For the (111)[101] slip system, first calculate the angle φ between [001] and (111). Use the dot product formula: cos(φ) = ([001] • (111))/(|[001]|*|(111)|).

Next, calculate the angle λ between [001] and [101] using the same formula. Then, substitute the calculated cos(φ) and cos(λ) values and the given stress of 75 MPa into the equation to find the resolved shear stress.

(b) For the (111)[110] slip system, follow the same process, but now calculate the angle φ between [001] and (111), and λ between [001] and [110]. Substitute the calculated cos(φ) and cos(λ) values and the given stress of 75 MPa into the equation to find the resolved shear stress.

To know more about shear stress click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/13385447#

#SPJ11

The pitcher has done 57.68 Joules of work on the 0.142 kg baseball by throwing it.

To calculate the work done on a 0.142 kg baseball by the pitcher, we need to consider the initial speed of the ball (28.5 m/s) and the terms "speed" and "work."

First, let's calculate the ball's kinetic energy (KE) using the formula: KE = 0.5 * mass * speed^2

KE = 0.5 * 0.142 kg * (28.5 m/s)^2

Now, solve for the kinetic energy:
KE = 0.071 * 812.25
KE = 57.68 J (Joules)

Since air drag is negligible, the work done by the pitcher on the ball is equal to the ball's kinetic energy. So, the pitcher has done 57.68 Joules of work on the 0.142 kg baseball by throwing it at a speed of 28.5 m/s.

To know more about work: https://brainly.com/question/25573309

#SPJ11

According to Phil, the only way we know how to get accurate stellar masses is when they are in a binary system.

In a binary system, two stars orbit each other, and their gravitational interaction can be observed and measured. This interaction allows astronomers to determine the stars' masses using Kepler's laws and other astrophysical methods. Other methods, such as using iron or hydrogen absorption lines, can provide information about the stars' compositions and temperatures, but not their masses with the same accuracy as binary systems.

To obtain accurate stellar masses, it is essential to observe stars in a binary system, as their gravitational interaction provides the most reliable measurements.

To know more about gravitational interaction visit:

brainly.com/question/11974484

#SPJ11

To find the voltage drop in the extension cord, we can use Ohm's Law, which states that V = IR, where V is the voltage drop, I is the current, and R is the resistance. Plugging in the given values, we get V = (5.00 A)(0.0600 Ω) = 0.3 V.

Using the same formula, we can find the voltage drop in the cheaper cord: V = (5.00 A)(0.300 Ω) = 1.5 V. The voltage drop occurs because the resistance of the cord causes some of the electrical energy to be converted into heat, rather than being delivered to the appliance. This reduces the voltage that reaches the appliance, which can affect its performance. For example, a motor might run more slowly, or a light bulb might be dimmer when the voltage is reduced. In some cases, the reduced voltage can also cause the appliance to draw more current, which can lead to further voltage drops and potentially damage the cord or the appliance.

Learn more about Ohm's Law here: https://brainly.com/question/19892453

#SPJ11

To find the voltage drop in the extension cord, we can use Ohm's Law, which states that V = IR, where V is the voltage drop, I is the current, and R is the resistance. Plugging in the given values, we get V = (5.00 A)(0.0600 Ω) = 0.3 V.

Using the same formula, we can find the voltage drop in the cheaper cord: V = (5.00 A)(0.300 Ω) = 1.5 V. The voltage drop occurs because the resistance of the cord causes some of the electrical energy to be converted into heat, rather than being delivered to the appliance. This reduces the voltage that reaches the appliance, which can affect its performance. For example, a motor might run more slowly, or a light bulb might be dimmer when the voltage is reduced. In some cases, the reduced voltage can also cause the appliance to draw more current, which can lead to further voltage drops and potentially damage the cord or the appliance.

Learn more about Ohm's Law here: https://brainly.com/question/19892453

#SPJ11

The intensity of the second lamp can be calculated using the inverse square law, which states that the intensity of light decreases with the square of the distance from the source. The equation for the inverse square law is:

I2 = I1 * (d1/d2)^2

where I1 is the intensity of the first lamp, d1 is the distance from the first lamp to the screen, I2 is the intensity of the second lamp, and d2 is the distance from the second lamp to the screen.

Substituting the given values, we get:

I2 = 12.5 cd * (3.0 m/9.0 m)^2

I2 = 12.5 cd * (1/3)^2

I2 = 12.5 cd * 0.111

I2 = 1.39 cd

Therefore, the intensity of the second lamp is 1.39 cd.

Learn more about Intensity here:- brainly.com/question/28145811

#SPJ11

The rotational kinetic energy of the object is 83,200 Joules.

The rotational kinetic energy of an object is the energy it possesses due to its rotation. It can be calculated using the formula:

[tex]K_rot = (1/2) * I * ω^2[/tex]

where K_rot is the rotational kinetic energy, I is the moment of inertia of the object, and ω is its angular velocity.

In this case, the object has a moment of inertia of [tex]26 kg·m^2[/tex]and is rotating with an angular speed of 80 radians/s. Substituting these values into the formula gives:

[tex]K_rot = (1/2) * 26 kg·m^2 * (80 radians/s)^2[/tex]

= 83,200 J

Therefore, the rotational kinetic energy of the object is 83,200 Joules.

learn more about kinetic energy

https://brainly.com/question/26472013

#SPJ4

Tyson Gay's average speed during the 100-meter run was approximately 23.1 mph

To find Tyson Gay's average speed during the 100.0-meter run, we'll first convert meters to feet, then feet to miles, and finally seconds to hours.

1. Convert meters to feet: 100.0 meters * 3.281 ft/m = 328.1 feet
2. Convert feet to miles: 328.1 feet / 5280 ft/mile ≈ 0.0621 miles
3. Convert seconds to hours: 9.69 seconds * (1 hour / 3600 seconds) ≈ 0.00269 hours

Now we can calculate the average speed:
Average speed = distance/time = 0.0621 miles / 0.00269 hours ≈ 23.1 miles per hour

So, Tyson Gay's average speed during the 100-meter run was approximately 23.1 mph, reported to three significant figures and rounded to one decimal place.

Learn more about average speed here:

https://brainly.com/question/12322912

#SPJ11

The wavelength of the ultrasonic wave emitted by bats is B) 3.4×10−3 m.

To calculate the wavelength of the ultrasonic wave emitted by bats, we can use the formula:

Wavelength (λ) = Speed of sound (v) / Frequency (f)

Given that the frequency (f) is 1.0×10^5 Hz and the speed of sound (v) is 340 m/s, we can plug in the values:

λ = 340 m/s / 1.0×10^5 Hz

λ = 3.4×10^−3 m

So the correct answer is: B) 3.4×10^−3 m

Learn more about ultrasonic wave at

https://brainly.com/question/3359719

#SPJ11

A section of a sphere is mirrored on both sides. If the magnification of an object is +3.70 the magnification is -4.70.

The magnification of an object at the same distance in front of the convex side of the mirrored section of a sphere can be found using the mirror equation:
1/f = 1/di + 1/do
where f is the focal length of the mirror, di is the distance of the object from the mirror, and do is the distance of the image from the mirror.
Since the section is mirrored on both sides, the focal length of the concave and convex sides will be the same. Therefore, we can use the magnification equation:
m = -di/do

where m is the magnification.
We know that when the section is used as a concave mirror, the magnification is +3.70. Therefore,
+3.70 = -di/do

Solving for do, we get
do = -di/3.70
Now, substituting this value of do into the mirror equation, we get
1/f = 1/di - 3.70/di
Simplifying this equation, we get
f = di/4.70
Therefore, the magnification of an object at the same distance in front of the convex side of the mirrored section will be
m = -di/(di/4.70)
m = -4.70

Learn more about magnification here:

https://brainly.com/question/21370207

#SPJ11

Kepler's Second Law indirectly describes the speeds with which planets travel in their orbits.

This law, also known as the Law of Equal Areas, states that a line connecting a planet to the sun sweeps out equal areas in equal times, implying that planets move faster when closer to the sun and slower when farther away.

According to Kepler's Second Law, a line that connects a planet to the sun, known as the radius vector, sweeps out equal areas in equal times as the planet moves along its elliptical orbit.

This means that a planet covers the same amount of area in its orbit during equal time intervals, regardless of where it is in its orbit. This implies that a planet moves faster when it is closer to the sun and slower when it is farther away.

This observation has significant implications for our understanding of planetary motion. As a planet moves closer to the sun, it experiences a stronger gravitational pull, which accelerates its motion and causes it to move faster.

Conversely, as a planet moves farther away from the sun, the gravitational pull weakens, resulting in a slower motion. This is consistent with Kepler's Second Law, which states that planets move faster in the inner parts of their orbits (when closer to the sun) and slower in the outer parts (when farther away from the sun).

To learn more about motion, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/22810476

#SPJ11

In the four trials of Exercise 1, one needs to accurately measure the length of four different radii and the corresponding time for 10 revolutions in order to calculate the speed of the stopper in revolutions per minute.

Additionally, one needs to measure the mass of the stopper in order to calculate the centripetal force acting on it. Therefore, the correct answer is d. All of the above.
one needs to accurately measure all of the above options, which include:
a. The length of four different radii and the corresponding time for 10 revolutions
b. The weight hanger
c. The mass of the stopper
Accurately measuring these factors ensures that the results and conclusions drawn from the experiment are reliable and valid.

Visit here to learn more about centripetal force:

brainly.com/question/14249440

#SPJ11

Option C is Correct. Traveling at a speed of 21 m/s, the driver of a car suddenly locks the wheels by slamming on the brakes so 3 sec need come to stop.

To solve this problem, we will use the concepts of kinetic friction and time. The formula to calculate the acceleration due to kinetic friction is:
a = μk × g
where a is the acceleration, μk is the coefficient of kinetic friction, and g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.81 m/s²).
1. Calculate the acceleration Speed due to kinetic friction:
a = 0.72  × 9.81 = 7.0632 m/s² (deceleration, since it's against the motion)
2. Next, we can use one of the equations of motion to find the time it takes for the car to stop. We'll use the following equation, where vf is the final velocity (0 m/s, as the car comes to a stop), vi is the initial velocity (21 m/s), a is the acceleration we calculated, and t is the time we want to find:
vf = vi + (a × t)
3. Solve for time, t:
0 = 21 + (-7.0632  × t)
7.0632  × t = 21
t = 21 / 7.0632 ≈ 2.97 sec
So, the answer is approximately 3 seconds.

Learn more about kinetic friction here

https://brainly.com/question/30886698

#SPJ11

A 95 kg flat stone is being pushed by Sisyphus up a 30° frictionless slope. To move it up the hill at a steady pace of 22 cm/s, he needs exert 475 N of effort. The kinetic friction coefficient is 0.26.

Therefore Acceleration, 0.26 is likely to be the kinetic friction coefficient.

Here: Mass of stone, m = 95 kg

Speed, v = 22 cm/s

Slope, θ = 30°g = 10 m/s²(a)

The force required to push the stone up the slope at a constant speed can be found using the formula:

Force = Weight x Component of Weight along the slope

F = mgsinθF = 95 x 10 x sin30°F = 475 N

Therefore, the force required to push the stone up the slope at a constant speed is 475 N.

b. Let's say the slope does have considerable friction, and Sisyphus lets the stone freely slide back down the ramp. If the stone has a constant acceleration downward of 2.6 m/s², then the likely coefficient of kinetic friction μ can be found using the formula:

μ = a/gμ = 2.6/10μ = 0.26

To know more about "Acceleration" refer here:

brainly.com/question/8231525#

#SPJ4

To answer your question:

(a) The magnitude of the point charge that creates a 16,000 N/C electric field at a distance of 0.270 m can be calculated using the equation:

E = k*q/r^2

where E is the electric field, k is Coulomb's constant (9 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2), q is the magnitude of the point charge, and r is the distance from the point charge.

Rearranging the equation to solve for q, we get:

q = Er^2/k

Substituting the given values, we have:

q = (16,000 N/C) x (0.270 m)^2 / (9 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2)

q = 1.85 x 10^-8 C

Therefore, a magnitude point charge of 1.85 x 10^-8 C creates a 16,000 N/C electric field at a distance of 0.270 m.

(b) To find out how large the electric field is at a distance of 10.0 m, we can use the same equation:

E = k*q/r^2

But this time, we know the magnitude of the point charge (q) and the distance (r), and we need to solve for the electric field (E).

Substituting the values, we have:

E = (9 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2) x (1.85 x 10^-8 C) / (10.0 m)^2

E = 3.7 x 10^-13 N/C

Therefore, the electric field at a distance of 10.0 m is 3.7 x 10^-13 N/C.
a) To find the magnitude of the point charge (in C) that creates a 16,000 N/C electric field at a distance of 0.270 m, you can use the formula for the electric field E:

E = k * |q| / r^2

where E is the electric field, k is Coulomb's constant (8.99 × 10^9 N m²/C²), |q| is the magnitude of the charge, and r is the distance.

16,000 N/C = (8.99 × 10^9 N m²/C²) * |q| / (0.270 m)^2

Solving for |q|, we get:

|q| ≈ 1.27 × 10^-6 C

b) To find the electric field (in N/C) at 10.0 m, we can use the same formula, with r = 10.0 m:

E = (8.99 × 10^9 N m²/C²) * (1.27 × 10^-6 C) / (10.0 m)^2

E ≈ 114 N/C

Visit here to learn more about Coulomb's constant brainly.com/question/9658349

#SPJ11

(b) 50%.  In a polarization of light experiment an incandescent light source is used. The ratio polarized to unpolarized light intensity is  50%.

In an experiment to measure the polarization of light, an incandescent light source is used to emit light in all directions. However, the emitted light is unpolarized, meaning that the light waves vibrate in all possible planes perpendicular to the direction of propagation. To obtain polarized light, a polarizer is used to pass only the light waves that vibrate in a single plane. As a result, only half of the original light intensity can pass through the polarizer, and the other half is absorbed or blocked. Thus, the ratio of polarized to unpolarized light intensity is 1:1 or 50%. This result holds true for any polarizer that only allows light waves vibrating in a single plane to pass through.

learn more about light intensity here:

https://brainly.com/question/30499504

#SPJ11

At the equator, Philadelphia, and the North Pole, a point's linear velocity and acceleration are determined as described above.

(a) At the equator:

The Earth's equator has a radius of 3960 miles. Therefore, the linear velocity of a point on the surface of the Earth at the equator is:

v = ωr = (2π / 23.9333 hours) * 3960 miles = 1037.564 mph

The acceleration of a point on the surface of the Earth at the equator can be calculated using the formula:

[tex]a = v^2 / ra = (1037.564 mph)^2 / 3960 miles = 0.273 g[/tex]

(b) At Philadelphia, latitude 40° north:

r = 3960 miles * cos(40°) = 3004.05 miles

The linear velocity of a point on the surface of the Earth at Philadelphia is:

v = ωr = (2π / 23.9333 hours) * 3004.05 miles = 784.166 mph

[tex]a = v^2 / r = (784.166 mph)^2 / 3004.05 miles = 0.154 g[/tex]

(c) At the North Pole:

r = 3960 miles * cos(90°) = 3960 miles

The linear velocity of a point on the surface of the Earth at the North Pole is:

v = ωr = (2π / 23.9333 hours) * 3960 miles = 1038.993 mph

The acceleration of a point on the surface of the Earth at the North Pole is:

[tex]a = v^2 / r = (1038.993 mph)^2 / 3960 miles[/tex] = 0.034 g

A key idea in physics is acceleration, which defines how rapidly an object's velocity alters over time. In other words, it is the rate at which the velocity of an object changes in relation to time. An item is considered to be accelerating when its speed changes, whether it is increasing or decreasing.

Depending on how the velocity changes, acceleration can be either positive or negative. For instance, an object's acceleration is positive while it is speeding up, whereas it is negative when it is going down. According to Newton's second equation of motion, acceleration is directly linked to the force pulling on an object.

To learn more about Acceleration visit here:

brainly.com/question/30660316

#SPJ4

At the equator, Philadelphia, and the North Pole, a point's linear velocity and acceleration are determined as described above.

(a) At the equator:

The Earth's equator has a radius of 3960 miles. Therefore, the linear velocity of a point on the surface of the Earth at the equator is:

v = ωr = (2π / 23.9333 hours) * 3960 miles = 1037.564 mph

The acceleration of a point on the surface of the Earth at the equator can be calculated using the formula:

[tex]a = v^2 / ra = (1037.564 mph)^2 / 3960 miles = 0.273 g[/tex]

(b) At Philadelphia, latitude 40° north:

r = 3960 miles * cos(40°) = 3004.05 miles

The linear velocity of a point on the surface of the Earth at Philadelphia is:

v = ωr = (2π / 23.9333 hours) * 3004.05 miles = 784.166 mph

[tex]a = v^2 / r = (784.166 mph)^2 / 3004.05 miles = 0.154 g[/tex]

(c) At the North Pole:

r = 3960 miles * cos(90°) = 3960 miles

The linear velocity of a point on the surface of the Earth at the North Pole is:

v = ωr = (2π / 23.9333 hours) * 3960 miles = 1038.993 mph

The acceleration of a point on the surface of the Earth at the North Pole is:

[tex]a = v^2 / r = (1038.993 mph)^2 / 3960 miles[/tex] = 0.034 g

A key idea in physics is acceleration, which defines how rapidly an object's velocity alters over time. In other words, it is the rate at which the velocity of an object changes in relation to time. An item is considered to be accelerating when its speed changes, whether it is increasing or decreasing.

Depending on how the velocity changes, acceleration can be either positive or negative. For instance, an object's acceleration is positive while it is speeding up, whereas it is negative when it is going down. According to Newton's second equation of motion, acceleration is directly linked to the force pulling on an object.

To learn more about Acceleration visit here:

brainly.com/question/30660316

#SPJ4

The items that help to fully describe VOLTAGE in a parallel circuit are 3) Directly related to current, 6) Inversely proportional to resistance, 7) Also known as Potential difference, and 11) Directly related to voltage.

To learn more about  voltage, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27861305

#SPJ11

A good tutor will be correct in saying that velocity and acceleration are different concepts. The correct option is A.

Velocity and acceleration are distinct concepts in physics and describe different aspects of motion.

Velocity refers to the rate at which an object changes its position in a particular direction over time. It is a vector quantity, meaning it has both magnitude (speed) and direction. Velocity is calculated as the change in displacement divided by the change in time.

Acceleration, on the other hand, refers to the rate at which an object changes its velocity over time. It is also a vector quantity and is calculated as the change in velocity divided by the change in time.

While velocity and acceleration are related, they are not the same concept and are expressed differently. Velocity describes the speed and direction of motion, while acceleration describes how quickly the velocity changes.

They are both important in understanding the motion of objects and are fundamental concepts in physics.

To know more about acceleration, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14683118#

#SPJ11

The energy required to accelerate a 1765 kg car from rest to 29 m/s is approximately 373,128,250 Joules.

To calculate the energy required to accelerate a car from rest to 29 m/s, we can use the formula:

E = (1/2)mv^2

where E is the energy, m is the mass of the car, and v is the final velocity.

First, we need to convert the mass of the car from kilograms to grams:

m = 1765 kg = 1,765,000 g

Next, we can substitute the values into the formula:

E = (1/2)(1,765,000 g)(29 m/s)^2

Simplifying the equation:

E = (1/2)(1,765,000)(841) JE = 373,128,250 J

To know more about accelerate, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/30660316

#SPJ4

If the number of turns in a rectangular coil of wire that is rotating in a magnetic field is tripled, the induced emf is increased by a factor of 3. (C)

This is because the emf is directly proportional to the number of turns in the coil. So, if the number of turns is tripled, the induced emf will also be tripled. It is important to note that this assumes all other variables, such as the magnetic field strength and the angular velocity of the coil, remain constant.

In summary, increasing the number of turns in a rotating rectangular coil of wire will increase the induced emf, while decreasing the number of turns will decrease the induced emf. This principle is used in many electrical devices, such as generators and motors, to control the amount of electrical energy produced or consumed.

To know more about induced emf click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31256154#

#SPJ11

The greatest force Fa that can be applied while ignoring column action is 12,000 lbf, while the question states that the bar's permissible stress is 20,000 psi.

A push or pull that causes a physical change in an item, such as a change in velocity, form, or size, is known as force. Forces may be physical or psychological. In contrast to non-contact forces like gravity, electricity, and magnetism, contact forces are generated by physical contact. A force's strength is often expressed in newtons (N).

The Goodman diagram can be used to calculate the bar's maximum load capacity.

The allowed stress and load factor are plotted on a chart called a Goodman diagram. The greatest load applied to the bar divided by the material's yield strength is known as the load factor.

The yield strength of cold-drawn flat steel AISI 1020 is about 40,000 psi. By dividing the yield strength by the design factor (nd-2), in this example 0.5, the allowed stress for the bar is calculated. Therefore, 20,000 psi is the maximum tension that the bar can withstand.

The Goodman diagram and 20,000 psi of permissible stress can be used to calculate the bar's maximum load capacity. The bar can support a maximum load of about 12,000 lbf. Therefore, 12,000 lbf is the maximum force Fa that can be applied while disregarding column action.

To learn more about force, visit:

brainly.com/question/12785175

#SPJ1

Let's use f1 to represent the diverging lens's focal length. The thin lens equation may be used to connect the problem's distances and focal lengths: Consequently, the divergent lens's focal length is 9.15 cm.

Now: 1/f1 = 1/d1 - 1/d2

1/f2 = 1/d2 - 1/d3

Here d1 is the distance from the candle to the diverging lens, d2 is the distance between the two lenses, and d3 is the distance from the converging lens to the final image. We can also use the magnification equation to relate the magnifications produced by the two lenses:

m = -(d2/f1)(f2/d3)

Here the negative sign indicates that the final image is inverted.

Values and solving the equations simultaneously, we get:

d1 = 38.0 cm

d2 = 6.0 cm

d3 = 42.0 cm

f2 = 14.0 cm

1/f1 = 1/d1 - 1/d2 = 1/38.0 cm - 1/6.0 cm = -0.0263 cm^-1

1/f2 = 1/d2 - 1/d3 = 1/6.0 cm - 1/42.0 cm = 0.1667 cm^-1

m = -(d2/f1)(f2/d3) = -(6.0 cm/(-0.0263 cm^-1))(0.1667 cm^-1/42.0 cm) = 1.53

Using the magnification equation, we can also relate the distances and focal lengths:

m = -f2/f1

Value of m and the given value of f2, we get:

1.53 = -14.0 cm/f1

f1 = -14.0 cm/1.53 = -9.15 cm

Since the focal length of a lens cannot be negative, we take the absolute value and get:

f1 = 9.15 cm

Learn more about focal length visit: brainly.com/question/28039799

#SPJ4

This agreement between the simulation results and the Law of Conservation of Momentum serves as evidence that the law holds true in the simulated scenario.

The results of this simulation exercise support the Law of Conservation of Momentum by showing that the total momentum before an event (collision or separation) is equal to the total momentum after the event.

1. In the simulation exercise, you likely observed two objects interacting, such as colliding or separating.

2. Before the event, you can calculate the total momentum by adding the individual momenta of the objects (momentum = mass x velocity).

3. After the event, you can calculate the total momentum again by adding the individual momenta of the objects with their new velocities.

4. Comparing the total momentum before and after the event, you'll notice that they are equal or very close to equal, which demonstrates the Law of Conservation of Momentum in action.

Hence, the results of this simulation exercise support the Law of Conservation of Momentum.

To learn more about Law of Conservation of Momentum, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1113396

#SPJ11

The gap in the inner walls as well as outer walls of the calorimeter is filled with air because it restricts the flow of the heat from inside to outside as well as outside to inside of the calorimeter. Option C is correct.

The gap in the outer and inner walls of a calorimeter is typically filled with air to act as an insulator. Air is a poor conductor of heat, meaning that it restricts the flow of heat from inside to outside and outside to inside of the calorimeter. This helps to maintain the temperature inside the calorimeter and prevents heat from escaping or entering the calorimeter too quickly.

Hence, C. is the correct option.

To know more about calorimeter here

https://brainly.com/question/4802333

#SPJ4

The spring constant is 245.0 N/m and the unstretched length is 0.280 m. The forces pulling on the spring increase to 22.0 N, pulling in opposite directions at opposite ends of the spring.

To find the new length of the spring, we can use Hooke's law, which states that the force applied to a spring is directly proportional to the amount of stretch or compression of the spring. The formula for Hooke's law is:

F = -kx

Where F is the force applied to the spring, k is the spring constant, and x is the amount of stretch or compression of the spring. The negative sign indicates that the force applied to the spring is in the opposite direction of the displacement of the spring.

We can rearrange this formula to solve for x:

x = -F/k

Plugging in the values we have:

x = -(22.0 N)/(245.0 N/m)
x = -0.0898 m

Therefore, the new length of the spring is:

L = Lo + x
L = 0.280 m - 0.0898 m
L = 0.1902 m

To find the work required to stretch the spring this distance, we can use the formula:

W = (1/2)kx^2

Plugging in the values we have:

W = (1/2)(245.0 N/m)(0.0898 m)^2
W = 0.975 J

Therefore, the work required to stretch the spring 0.0898 m is 0.975 J.
Hello! I'd be happy to help you with your question.

Given the spring's force constant (k) is 245.0 N/m, and the force applied (F) is 22.0 N, we can use Hooke's Law to determine the change in the spring's length (Δx):

F = k * Δx

Rearranging the formula to find Δx:

Δx = F / k
Δx = 22.0 N / 245.0 N/m
Δx ≈ 0.0898 m

Now, to find the new length of the spring (L'), add the change in length (Δx) to the unstretched length (L):

L' = L + Δx
L' = 0.280 m + 0.0898 m
L' ≈ 0.3698 m

To calculate the work (W) done in stretching the spring, we use the formula:

W = 0.5 * k * Δx²
W = 0.5 * 245.0 N/m * (0.0898 m)²
W ≈ 1.003 J

So, the spring will now be approximately 0.3698 meters long, and 1.003 Joules of work was required to stretch it that distance.

Learn more about Hooke's law here:

https://brainly.com/question/29126957

#SPJ11

The first-order decomposition of phosphine is a chemical reaction in which phosphine decomposes into its constituent elements over time. The rate of this reaction is proportional to the concentration of phosphine. In this problem, we are given that the time required to go from 1.00 m to 0.250 m is 120 seconds.

To determine the time it will take for the concentration to go from 0.400 m to 0.100 m, we can use the following formula:

ln([A]t/[A]0) = -kt

where [A]t is the concentration of phosphine at time t, [A]0 is the initial concentration of phosphine, k is the rate constant of the reaction, and t is the time.

We can rearrange this formula to solve for t:

t = ln([A]t/[A]0) / -k

We know that the initial concentration is [A]0 = 0.400 m and the final concentration is [A]t = 0.100 m. We can also use the rate constant k, which can be determined from the half-life of the reaction:

t1/2 = ln(2) / k

We are given that the time required to go from 1.00 m to 0.250 m is 120 seconds, so we can use this information to find the half-life:

t1/2 = ln(2) / k = ln(2) / (120 seconds) = 0.0058 seconds^-1

Now we can use this value of k and the concentrations to find the time required to go from 0.400 m to 0.100 m:

t = ln([A]t/[A]0) / -k = ln(0.100/0.400) / (-0.0058 seconds^-1) = 358 seconds

Therefore, it will take approximately 358 seconds for the concentration of phosphine to go from 0.400 m to 0.100 m.

learn more about decomposition here: brainly.com/question/28383069

#SPJ11

the wavelength of the given frequency is approximately 4.18 x 10^-5 meters.

To calculate the wavelength given a frequency of 7.187x106 MHz, we need to use the equation:

wavelength = speed of light / frequency

The speed of light is approximately 3x108 meters per second.

First, we need to convert the frequency from MHz to Hz, since the speed of light is in meters per second and the frequency needs to be in hertz.

7.187x106 MHz = 7.187x106 x 106 Hz = 7.187x1012 Hz

Now we can plug in the values:

wavelength = 3x108 / 7.187x1012 = 4.17x10-5 meters

Therefore, the wavelength for a frequency of 7.187x106 MHz is approximately 4.17x10-5 meters.
To calculate the wavelength given a frequency, you can use the following formula:

wavelength = speed of light / frequency

Given the frequency of 7.187 x 10^6 MHz, first convert it to Hz:

7.187 x 10^6 MHz x 10^6 Hz/MHz = 7.187 x 10^12 Hz

Now, using the speed of light (c) which is approximately 3 x 10^8 m/s:

wavelength = (3 x 10^8 m/s) / (7.187 x 10^12 Hz)

wavelength ≈ 4.18 x 10^-5 m

So, the wavelength of the given frequency is approximately 4.18 x 10^-5 meters.

To know more about wavelength click here:

brainly.com/question/12924624

#SPJ11

Magnification is the relationship between the size of an image and the size of the item that created it in optics. The ratio of the image length to the object length, as measured in planes perpendicular to the optical axis, is referred to as linear magnification, also known as lateral or transverse magnification.

Since the section of the sphere is mirrored on both sides, the focal length of the concave mirror and the convex mirror will be the same. Therefore, we can use the mirror formula:
1/f = 1/u + 1/v
Where f is the focal length, u is the distance of the object from the mirror, and v is the distance of the image from the mirror.

When the section is used as a concave mirror, the magnification is given by:
m = -v/u = +4.10

Since the magnification is positive, the image is upright.

Now, when the same object is placed in front of the convex side at the same distance u, the image will be virtual and erect. The magnification is given by:
m = v/u

To find v, we need to first find f. We know that:
m = -v/u = +4.10
Therefore, v = -4.10u

Now, using the mirror formula, we can find f:
1/f = 1/u + 1/v
1/f = 1/u - 1/4.10u
1/f = (4.10 - 1)/4.10u
f = 4.10u/3.10
f = 1.32u

Now that we know the focal length, we can find the image distance v:
1/f = 1/u + 1/v
1/1.32u = 1/u + 1/v
v = -0.32u

Therefore, the magnification is: m = v/u = -0.32

So, the at the same distance in front of the convex side is -0.32.

Know more about the magnification of the object:

https://brainly.com/question/20486185

#SPJ11