Answer: 4 Justices
Explanation:
In the Supreme Court, if four Justices agree to review the case, then the Court will hear the case. This is referred to as "granting certiorari," often abbreviated as "cert." If four Justices do not agree to review the case, the Court will not hear the case.
What do you think makes a particular action a crime?
Most people haven’t read all of the state and federal laws defining illegal acts. So as a member of society, how do you know what is against the law? Give examples of how you learned which acts are criminal and should be avoided.
Answer:
Something I believe makes a certain thing a crime is considering whether it hurts others, or is morally wrong. People mostly rely on what their morals are to figure what is against the law.
I learned that jaywalking was considered illegal where I live as I saw someone get hit by a car, and the police couldn't do much considering they were jaywalking.
5. The indirect way of manipulating the mindset of everyone affected
Answer:
Ideological Power
Explanation:
According to Stephen Lukes in his book, Power: A Radical View (1974), the third face of power is Ideological power. Lukes argue that Ideological power is an indirect way of manipulating the mindset of anyone affected.
how many total seats are in the house of representatives
Answer:
There are 435 seats split between the 50 states.
Explanation:
State # of Representatives
Alabama 7
Alaska 1
Arizona 9
Arkansas 4
California 53
Colorado 7
Connecticut 5
Delaware 1
Florida 27
Georgia 14
Hawaii 2
Idaho 2
Illinois 18
Indiana 9
Iowa 4
Kansas 4
Kentucky 6
Louisiana 6
Maine 2
Maryland 8
Massachusetts 9
Michigan 14
Minnesota 8
Mississippi 4
Missouri 8
Montana 1
Nebraska 3
Nevada 4
New Hampshire 2
New Jersey 12
New Mexico 3
New York 27
North Carolina 13
North Dakota 1
Ohio 16
Oklahoma 5
Oregon 5
Pennsylvania 18
Rhode Island 2
South Carolina 7
South Dakota 1
Tennessee 9
Texas 36
Utah 4
Vermont 1
Virginia 11
Washington 10
West Virginia 3
Wisconsin 8
Wyoming 1
Total 435
which legal tradition did many modern european codes of law evolve from?
Answer:
As a legal system, Roman law has affected the development of law in most of Western civilization as well as in parts of the East. It forms the basis for the law codes of most countries of continental Europe (see civil law) and derivative systems elsewhere.
Explanation:
A conviction in the Circuit Court would be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Which type of job do you consider to be more important: doing crime-related research or working directly with offenders and victims? Why?
3. SELECT ALL THAT APPLY: Which of these are potential signs for aggressive
behavior?
Amanda was fired from a previous job for slapping a Coworker she was
dating.
Mike tends to avoid people during lunch and was once heard making
violent threats under his breath.
Sherly often expresses that she is depressed and wishes at times that she
was dead.
Candice tends to take walks alone at lunchtime.
Maurice has started fighting with the coworkers she thinks are likely to be
promoted before her.
Potential signs for aggressive behaviour include-
Amanda was fired from a previous job for slapping a Coworker she was dating.Mike tends to avoid people during lunch and was once heard making violent threats under his breath.Maurice has started fighting with the coworkers she thinks are likely to be promoted before her.What is aggressive behaviour?A behaviour which leads to hurting any individual or property knowingly in revenge for something is considered aggressive behaviour. This behaviour can be caused due to genetic and hormonal factors.
Hormonal factors include when an individual has a lack of control over something which leads them to frustration and appears in the form of aggression.
The situation of Amanda, Mike and Maurice involves physical violence which reflects aggression in their actions. Therefore, it is considered aggressive behaviour.
This can be improved by relaxing calm and practising meditation to control the thinking power which eliminates the making of assumptions.
Learn more about aggression, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13082764
#SPJ5
module #3 of this course is devoted to the common law. what is the common law?
Answer:
Common law is law that is derived from judicial decisions instead of from statutes.
Explanation:
Common law is law that is derived from judicial decisions instead of from statutes. ... Though most common law is found at the state level, there is a limited body of federal common law--that is, rules created and applied by federal courts absent any controlling federal statute.
Information that is heard from another person rather than personally observed or heard is called
Perjury
Hearsay
Evidence
Plea
Answer: Hearsay
Explanation:
what does the reasonable person standard impose on a person in a negligence lawsuit?
Answer:
The “reasonable person” is a hypothetical individual who approaches any situation with the appropriate amount of caution and then sensibly takes action
Explanation:
The “reasonable person” is a hypothetical individual who approaches any situation with the appropriate amount of caution and then sensibly takes action. It is a standard created to provide courts and juries with an objective test that can be used in deciding whether a person's actions constitute negligence.
How did watching the debate (Vice president 2020) challenge or complicate your previous opinions on the candidates or the campaign? What new questions did it raise for you?
what is photosynthesis
[tex]\sf{\underline{\underline{Photosynthesis }}}[/tex]
Photosynthesis is a chemical reaction that takes place inside a plant, producing food for the plant to survive.Carbon dioxide, water and light are all needed for photosynthesis to take place.Photosynthesis happens in the leaves of a plant.
Another name for a "pat down" is
Witch two cases made drug testing in u.s. high schools?
Answer:
Vernonia school district V. Acton, 515 U.S. 646 (1995) and board of education V. Earls, 122 S.Ct. 2559 (2002)
hope this helps
Explanation:
Criminal statutes that are not clearly written are
probably susceptible to enforcement in an
arbitrary or discriminatory manner by police,
prosecutors, judges, and juries.
O True
False
Answer:
CDCCSDFJefuhf e
Explanation:
CDCRFDF
I NEED THIS AWSER ILL GIVE BRIANALIS
Currently, United States Supreme Court Justices serve a life-long term. If you agree that Supreme Court Justices should serve a life-long term, provide reasons for your opinion. If you believe Supreme Court Justices should have a term limit, identify what the limit would be and provide reasons for your opinion.
Answer:
I believe they should not have a term limit. Supreme Court Justice's are chosen with care and delicacy. They are chose very precisely. Choosing a Justice is one of the most important actions that the U.S. president can do. A Supreme Court Justice can end its working as a Supreme Court Justice by retiring, resigning, or being removed from office.
But I don't think that they should have term limits because sticking someone random in there all the time could mess things up very much. They could think different. They might not have the right mindset for the people. And the president takes a lot precautions when selecting a Supreme Court Justice, doing that every four years for example would be a lot of work.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :}
Pls mark brainliest :P
And have an amazing day <3
1. After reading the case study, what could Richard's motive have been for killing his wife?
Answer:
you didn't post the case study
Which of the following is NOT part of the “care” step of the emergency action steps?
Please answer this question
Answer:
b
(20 CHARACTERS)
Imagine a 28-year-old man named Keith is about to be released from prison after serving a seven-year sentence. Keith is not sure where to start when he gets out. The lease on his apartment and his job are both long gone. He has no immediate family to give him a hand, and he will be completely on his own. What types of things do you think he might need help with once he is released?
Answer:
A Place to stay
Explanation:
First he needs to find a place to stay as a homeless shelter if he has money in his bank he can rent an appartement or a hotel just till he can find a job if he dose not have money he can go to a homeless shelter.
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate?
Answer:
Am not really sure but i think yes they should
Explanation:
what is the highest court for criminal cases in texas?
Answer:
The Court of Criminal Appeals
Explanation:
The Court of Criminal Appeals is Texas' highest court for criminal cases. The Court consists of a Presiding Judge and eight Judges. They are elected by the voters of the entire state, and they hold their offices for terms of six years.
Explain the importance of the law. in 5 points.
1. keeps everybody safe
2. opens career options (eg. police officer, lawyer, etc)
3. ensures rights (eg. voting, home owning, etc)
4. regulated society
5. helps with beliefs and values
Answer:
It tell us our rights and dutiesIt provide access to justiceLaws help maintaining peace.Laws protect the most vulnerable in societyThe process of creating laws encourages civil and political engagement.Please paraphrase this :
"The Loose interpretation states that the Federal government can do what is good for the country even if the Constitution doesn't explicitly allow it, but the Strict interpretation states that the Federal government can only do what the Constitution says it can do."
Paraphrase = express the meaning of (the writer or speaker or something written or spoken) using different words, especially to achieve greater clarity.
The Loose interpretation states that the Federal government can do what is good for the country even if the Constitution doesn't explicitly allow it, but the Strict interpretation states that the Federal government can only do what the Constitution says it can do.
Can become
\/
The Loose interpretation says that the Federal government can do something outside of the Constitution as long as it is good for the country. That being said, the strict interpretation says that the Federal government must stick to the Constitution.
No hacer español para esto, ya que está escrito en inglés
unless subsequently heard by the supreme court, the decisions made by federal appeals courts are final. how does the system attempt to mitigate the danger of such a provision?
The Constitution gives federal courts a lot power and so to ensure that this is not abused:
a. Multiple judges serve on every appeals case. b. Each circuit has a Supreme Court justice assigned to it to handle special requests for action by the Supreme Court.Federal appeals courts are able to hear matters that relate to federal law and so have more power than state courts in this regard.
To ensure that the right ruling is made, there are multiple judges that serve in an appeals case to ensure that multiple opinions are taken into account.
Every federal appeals court circuit also has a Supreme Court Justice assigned to allow the Supreme Court to act quickly if the appeals court rules in an unfavorable manner.
In conclusion, the federal appeals court is quite powerful but there are measures in place to ensure that this power is not abused.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/12621040.
Options for this question include:
a. Multiple judges serve on every appeals case.
b. Each circuit has a Supreme Court justice assigned to it to handle special requests for action by the Supreme Court.
c. Each circuit must have a percentage of it decisions reviewed by another circuit annually.
d. Appeals court decisions must be validated by a circuit court judge who did not actively serve on the case.
What kind of laws should states pass to improve the juvenile justice system?
Answer:
great then as if there children and not criminals
is there a difference between parliamentary work (e.g. legislature) and law itself?
The Parliament is the whole term for law-making bodies. ... The Legislature is generally the body that discusses and makes laws for the country or state. For example, the Lok Sabha is a legislative body.
Which of the following could be considered an ultrahazardous activity?
A. Keeping a non-domesticated animal in a home
B. Using explosives in a desert area
C. Storing hazardous chemicals in a secured building
O D. Transporting radioactive waste through a rural area
the answer is D because radioactive materials can tamper with DNA and cause cancer
A business reports a theft. Once the police are informed of the possible crime, what happens next, before any arrests are made?
Answer:
the police have to question the victim of the crime to gain any possible information and or leads
who presides over any impeachment trial of the president of the united states
Answer:
The Chief Justice of the Senate does.
Explanation:
The Chief Justice of the Senate presides over any impeachment trial of the president of the U.S. . Can be seen in Article 1 section 3 of the U.S. Constitution.
Hope this helps