How are contradictory and ambiguous terms in a written agreement interpreted by a court?

Aside from federalism, the Constitution's core values are bicameralism, checks and balances, and separation of powers.

The Constitution established a national government independent of the states, but it also listed (or "enumerated") the powers of the federal government.

Balances and Checks

Each branch also doesn't have complete control over the authority that has been given to it. It was succinctly stated by political scientist Richard Neustadt: "The Constitutional Convention of 1787 is meant to have established a government with'separated powers.'"

Bicameralism

By dividing the legislature into two different and separate chambers—the House of Representatives and the Senate—government is further complicated.

Learn more about Constitution here

https://brainly.com/question/28662145

#SPJ1

Answer:

There are several ways to change the structure of the executive branch of the federal government in the United States:

Constitutional amendment: The structure of the executive branch is outlined in the Constitution, so making changes to it requires amending the Constitution. This can be done through the process outlined in Article V of the Constitution, which requires the approval of two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and the ratification of three-fourths of the states.

Statutory law: Congress has the power to pass statutory law, which can modify the structure of the executive branch. For example, Congress could pass a law creating a new executive branch agency or modifying the responsibilities of an existing agency.

Presidential executive orders: The President has the authority to issue executive orders, which are directives issued by the President to the executive branch that have the force of law. Executive orders can be used to reorganize the executive branch, although they can be challenged and overturned by Congress or the courts.

Presidential reorganization plans: The President has the authority to submit reorganization plans to Congress under the Reorganization Act of 1949. These plans can be used to reorganize the executive branch, but they must be approved by Congress before they can take effect.

Explanation:

Answer:

It now had the authority to propose laws and veto laws proposed by the executive.

Explanation:

In contrast to the legislature under the 1931 Constitution which could only discuss matters referred to it, it now had the authority to propose laws and veto laws proposed by the executive.

Answer: Article ||

Explanation: Article II of the United States Constitution vests executive power in the President of the United States. As head of the executive branch, the President is charged with enforcing the laws written by the legislative branch (see “Congress”) and is empowered in various ways to fulfill this duty.

Answer:

Fatigue

Explanation:

The mental state that has the following effects on driver attitude: reductions in alertness, perception, and judgment, and weakened vision, physical coordination, and reaction time is fatigue.

Lincoln fought for the release of the slaves because he wanted to achieve what was necessary.

The 16th president of the USA was indeed the American attorney, statesman, and diplomat Abraham Lincoln. In 1863, he issued the Emancipation Proclamation which proclaimed all slaves in the Republic free indefinitely.

The President wanted full statutory authorization to put an end to the relentlessly repugnant practice of black people being confined as slaves and coerced into unpaid labor.

Learn more about Lincoln, Here:

https://brainly.com/question/10374659

#SPJ1

The question is incomplete, the complete question will be :

What did Lincoln mean by this "act of justice" is being done "upon military necessity?"

Answer:

answer

Explanation:

hopefully I'm right but it should be the government or president

Answer:

The County Commissioner

Explanation:

Every county commissioner is in charge/committed to the preservation of the unique historic and cultural heritage of their county.

Take a broad picture of the crime scene. Ensure that the photo is properly illuminated.

Thus, the correct option is A.

Any place that might be connected to a crime is considered a crime scene. Crime scenes can contain tangible evidence that is pertinent to a criminal investigation.

Law enforcement and crime scene investigators (CSI) gather this data.

The scene of a crime can be wherever the incident occurred or anywhere there is evidence left behind from the actual crime.

Scenes can be any person, place, or thing connected to the criminal actions that took place; they are not simply restricted to a specific area.

Once a crime scene has been located, it needs to be secured and protected from contamination.

Learn more about crime scene, here

https://brainly.com/question/1329009

#SPJ1

Answer:

Police officers need to have a strong understanding of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. This means that, in most cases, police officers must have probable cause to believe that a person has committed a crime before they can search that person or their property.

If a police officer conducts a search or seizure without probable cause, they could be violating the Fourth Amendment rights of the individual, which could lead to legal consequences for both the officer and the police department. Therefore, it is important for police officers to have a strong understanding of the Fourth Amendment and to follow its provisions when conducting searches and seizures.

Additionally, a strong understanding of the Fourth Amendment can help police officers to properly gather evidence and build cases against individuals who have committed crimes, while also respecting the rights of individuals who have not. This can help to ensure that police officers are able to effectively do their jobs while also upholding the principles of justice and fairness.

Explanation:

There are several events or conditions that can prevent the performance of a contract by either or both of the parties. Some common examples include:

1.) The death or incapacity of one of the parties: If one of the parties dies or becomes incapacitated, they may no longer be able to fulfill their obligations under the contract.

2.) The destruction of the subject matter of the contract: If the subject matter of the contract is destroyed or rendered unusable, the contract may be impossible to perform.

3.) A change in law: If a change in the law makes it illegal or impossible to fulfill the contract, either party may be excused from performing.

4.) Impossibility or impracticality: If it becomes impossible or impractical to perform the contract, either party may be excused from performing.

5.) Breach of contract by the other party: If one party breaches the contract, the other party may be excused from performing.

In any of these cases, the parties may be able to terminate the contract or seek legal remedies such as damages. It is important for parties to carefully consider these potential obstacles when entering into a contract, and to include provisions in the contract that address these issues.

Answer:

Death of anyone included in the contract

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

nicki ngl

Answer:

nicki 1000000%

Explanation:

Carla borrowed Ann's food processor to make pizza sauce for canning. Carla got a wooden spoon stuck in the blades and burned up the motor. It was an actual bailment, marginal care was violated because the material possession bailed food processor was destroyed.

A bailment is made when one individual delivers personal property to another without transferring title. A bailment is dissolved when its purpose is met, when the sides consent to terminate it, or when the bonded property is destroyed.

Carla, according to the complaint, borrowed Ann's stick blender to make nacho cheese sauce for canning. Carla became entangled in the rotors and destroyed it. Because the physical possession bail food processor was destroyed, there was an actual bailment, and marginal care was broken.

As a result, the conclusion of the case are the bailment was created are the aforementioned.

Learn more about as bailment was created, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30302077

#SPJ2

Answer:

A licensed driver in the front seat of 21 years of age or older.

Explanation:

Answer:

Executive Branch

Explanation:

Legislative makes the laws, Executive had the power to veto or pass the law, but not make them

Answer: Scenario

Like any big city, Los Angeles has to deal with illegal drugs. Of course, many of those drugs come from outside the city. Some drugs come over the border from Mexico. Some are manufactured in illegal labs around the United States. Within California, growers have hidden illegal marijuana farms in state and national parks. The Los Angeles Police Department can target drug problems within the city. However, they don’t have the jurisdiction or resources to stop the influx of drugs from outside the city.

What agencies might the Los Angeles police want to collaborate with to address these problems? What barriers might make this collaboration difficult?

Explanation:Scenario

Like any big city, Los Angeles has to deal with illegal drugs. Of course, many of those drugs come from outside the city. Some drugs come over the border from Mexico. Some are manufactured in illegal labs around the United States. Within California, growers have hidden illegal marijuana farms in state and national parks. The Los Angeles Police Department can target drug problems within the city. However, they don’t have the jurisdiction or resources to stop the influx of drugs from outside the city.

What agencies might the Los Angeles police want to collaborate with to address these problems? What barriers might make this collaboration difficult?

Answer: defamation.

Explanation:

Defamation is a type of tort, which is a civil wrong, that involves harming someone's reputation through false statements. When defamation occurs over the Internet, it is often referred to as "online defamation" or "internet defamation." It is important to note that defamation is a legal term and the use of the term or its consequences may vary depending on the jurisdiction. It is best to consult a lawyer for legal advice on this matter.

Answer:

The Uruguay Round was a series of trade negotiations that took place from 1986 to 1994. The negotiations were among 123 countries and were the first major trade negotiations to take place under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The negotiations resulted in the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO), which is an international organization that oversees the global rules of trade.

In addition to the establishment of the WTO, the Uruguay Round negotiations resulted in several other agreements. These include the following:

The Agreement on Agriculture, which established rules for international trade in agricultural products and sought to reduce barriers to trade in this sector

The Agreement on Textiles and Clothing, which phased out the global system of quotas on textiles and clothing trade

The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), which established rules for international trade in services

The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), which established minimum standards for the protection of intellectual property rights

The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), which sought to reduce barriers to trade that arise from technical regulations, standards, and testing procedures

These agreements, along with the establishment of the WTO, were seen as significant achievements of the Uruguay Round negotiations and have had a lasting impact on international trade.

Answer: first

hope this helps!

Only people who are at least 18 years old and U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents are permitted to own or sell weapons or ammunition, to preserve the second amendment, while still keeping safety in mind.

The Second Amendment guarantees a person's freedom to own a gun without having to join a militia and to use it for customarily legal purposes, like domestic self-defense.

The Founders believed that people should be able to defend themselves from the government and any other dangers to their safety or individual liberties. Citizens now have the right to protect their lives and property thanks to the Second Amendment.

To learn more about second amendment

https://brainly.com/question/8244125

#SPJ1

According to psychiatrist Peter Ash when deciding how to deal with young offenders, it's important to consider a number of elements, including public safety, a reasonable penalty, and the promotion of moral and productive citizenship.

Peter Ash claims that one's capacity for self-control and sound judgment is only one factor in determining one's level of responsibility; another factor is the possibility of development. Adolescents have the option to reflect on their past experiences and, maybe, move on from them as they get older.

We should consider the adolescent to be less accountable since he lacks the same level of decision-making expertise and the same possibilities for introspection as an adult. Knowing that an adolescent is still evolving adds to the disturbing feeling that a teenager who is punished today is not the same person who will be locked up in five years.

To know more about juvenile offenders, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29388996

#SPJ1

Answer:

hi there!

i believe it is different for each states. the baker act provided emergency mental health services and temporary detention to people who are unsafe because of their mental illness. your sister can be held in there involuntarily for only up to 72 hours.. that is if she wasnt a minor, now for her it is only 12 hours before examination is initiated. you said that you and your family have not been able to see her? as im researching more about this law, it found out that "unless having visitors will be harmful to the person being treated. If a facility wants to restrict visitors from a patient, they must file a written notice documenting the refusal of visitation." which means you guys must have gotten a written notice telling you that seeing her isnt the safest option right now. since your sister is a minor someone must have had to contacted the police/ law enforcement about her..

mental heath facilities have to provide notice to minor patient guardians, no later than 24 hours after admission, they must also document all contact attempts. that notification must be give as soon as your sister entered at that facility.. it can take just about a full 24 hours if the facility have evidence to believe that the patient has been abused.

i have yet to have any evidence that states that they can hold minors without consent of the legal parent guardian, i doubt that your sister was able to even go into that mental heath facility without your parents or someone with the law knowing.

i really hope this help you and i hope the best for your family and your sister!

( here is a photo that might explain the process a little better then i can at this moment )

The responsibility of  the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is to enforce the federal laws that prohibit discriminating against employment applicants or employees based on their race, color, religion, or sex (including pregnancy and related conditions, gender identity, and sexual orientation)

The organization in charge of upholding federal laws against discrimination or harassment against a job applicant or employee in the United States is known as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Congress established the EEOC to uphold Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) looks into claims of employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual orientation), national origin, disability, age (40 or older), or genetic information.

Learn more about EEOC at:

https://brainly.com/question/14774625

#SPJ1

The ethic decision making principle that the constitutional clause of imprisoning someone for a decade for stealing 10 dollars most likely reflects is fairness and justice. This principle holds that all individuals should be treated equally and with fairness, and that decisions should be based on principles of justice and the rule of law. Imprisoning someone for such a long period of time for stealing a relatively small amount of money could be seen as unfair and unjust, and therefore goes against the principle of fairness and justice. The other options, rights, virtue, and common good, do not directly relate to the idea of fairness and justice in decision making. Therefore, the correct answer is \boxed{fairness and justice}.