Answer:alr i gotchu<3
Explanation
Drivers are often not getting enough training and not experianced enough and by changing the drivers age guidelines from sixteen to eighteen that could no longer be a problem. There is quite a big age difference between 16 and 18 so young drivers would be a lot more mature. Keeping teens safe is the primary argument for raising the driving age. With more than one-third of teenagers classified as overweight or obese, eliminating an opportunity for exercise would not be considered very often if they could hop in the car and drive. Raising the driving age would stop unhealthy multitasking habits. It could lower teen fatality rates.
Maturity really comes into place in this situation because The brain isn't fully developed at 18; that doesn't happen until a person's mid-20s, typically. However, emotional maturity increases with age and experience. While a 16-year-old may drive faster than is safe because her friends tease her for being slow, at 18, that same teen may have the maturity to consider consequences and resist peer pressure.
At sixteen parents are worrying about if their kid/kids are being safe while driving, especially on the freeway. The fatal crash rate per mile driven is nearly twice as high for 16-17 year-olds as it is for 18-19 year-olds. High speed thrills are often part of the teen driving experience. Although those thrills aren’t going to go away, there is more decision-making skills that have been practiced in the two years from 16 to 18. Keeping minors from getting behind the wheel unsupervised could prevent injury and death not only to these teen drivers but for their passengers and drivers in other cars.
With more than one-third of teenagers classified as overweight or obese, eliminating an opportunity for exercise would not be considered very often if they could hop in the car and drive. Now by making the driving age 18 that gives teens another two years of a source of exersise especially if they live not too far from school. Health concerns factor into driving age debates. Even if a teen can safely walk to a friend's house or school, it's unlikely he'll choose that option if he can hop in the car instead. There’s no denying that today’s kids are dealing with weight issues. 1 in 3 Americans, for example, are overweight right now and the percentage keeps increasing. By raising the driving age 2 years, older teens may be encouraged to exercise more and learn healthier habits since the car isn’t available to them.
Raising the driving age would stop unhealthy multitasking habits such as: texting while driving, answering calls while driving, ect. In the younger teen years, smartphones and other technology distractions can make driving very dangerous. At the age of 18, there have been adjustments made so that technology isn’t as important as driving when compared to the age of 16. there are too many distractions for younger drivers.
It could lower teen fatality rates. Many high schoolers don't have cars or even driver's licenses but do have a friend with wheels. Teens are most likely to have fatal crashes when they're driving with passengers. the risk of a fatal crash increases with each passenger. So if your child's lab partner or crush can't load the gang into his car for a fast-food run because he's not old enough to drive, you don't have to worry about her safety as a passenger in the car with him.
in conclusion raising the teen driving age to sixteen would help drivers be safe, causaus, and aware of their surroundings making sure that they are paying attention to whats infront of them instead of goofing around.
some of this was spelled inncorrectly so i hope you can figure that out but i really hope this helped<3:) also i didnt add anything about utah so im sorry but i hope this still works!
When Proctor forgets the adultery commandment, it is an example of irony. What is the purpose of the irony in this scene?
Answer:
In 'The Crucible,' the purpose of irony in Proctor forgetting the commandment against adultery is to emphasize the idea to the readers in understanding the difference between the expectations and the reality/outcome as he actually didn't apply that commandment in his life. He had a love affair with Abigail and therefore, he pretends that he does not remember the commadment preaching not to commit adultery which conveys the readers the distinction between his words and actions.
Where and how should you use evidence in a literary analysis?
Group of answer choices
in the third paragraph, to summarize the entire novel
at the very beginning of your essay, to introduce your topic
in the conclusion, to emphasize your main ideas
in the body of your essay, to support your reasons
Answer:
in the boday of your easy to support your reason
What is the main idea of this:
I could have given up, but I thought about my grandmother. She always told me that "people who believe that science is the answer to everything are missing out on everything else." With her words in mind, I searched some more. There were many facts that hinted that dragons may not be fictional. I noticed that cultures across the world all described dragons in similar ways. This was odd because they had no way to communicate with each other. I found dragons mentioned in more than just stories. They appeared in old legal papers, in the travel logs of Marco Polo, and in the Bible. I saw that the Chinese calendar uses a different animal each year. Dragons are included along with eleven real animals. I began to believe it was a real possibility that all of these people were talking about a creature that actually existed.
Answer:the main idea of this is that science is only things that scientists see and they don´t what is in people´s minds and only believe in what they see.
Explanation:
Answer: Dragons are real because all the other animals on the calendar are real.
After reading the Common Lit article about Anne Frank, think about what you would do if you were in a
situation like the one Anne was in.
Respond to the writing prompt: What would you do if you had to go into hiding for an indefinite amount
of time? Where would you go? Who would you go with? What would you take?
Answer:no
Explanation:he Holocaust was one of the greatest human tragedies the world has ever known. ... Although she did not survive the war, millions of people have since read the ... As you read, take notes on how Anne Frank's life and the lives of her family ... Anne and her family went into hiding in an apartment, which would eventually ...
it is very important for exam please please please please
Answer:
One of the way the world gonna be different in 2150 modern times is their gonna more access to technology everybody in world will have internet and its gonna make it more easy to communicate countries of another language.
Another way is there gonna be more machines advanced meaning there gonna be robots living with us and help us like being need company freind.
Another way is that people are not gonna go out like in our time meaning their gonna stay in their house and not go to nature since they had more advance technology.
Another way is that theres gonna be more transportation techonolgy meaning fly cars and flying trains.
Another difference is that they won't use on future money paper they use their hand to scan item to buy in future
is lucky an archetype?
Answer:
yes lucky is an archetype
Explanation:
Need someone to write a THEME STATEMENT that defines your life, and explain in at least three more sentences what has happened within your life that leads you to choose this statement.
Answer:
bro this is abuot your life this Question have asked
you to explain what has happened in your life
Explanation:
hope it helps you
what is research means?
Answer: the systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions
The thesis statement of a strong compare-and-contrast essay should combine
two relevant details and the main topic.
O the writer's viewpoint with a summary of the details.
O the writer's observations with a viewpoint.
the topic with the writer's viewpoint.
Answer:
The Answer is D: the topic with the writer's viewpoint.
Explanation:
The thesis statement of a strong compare-and-contrast essay should combine the topic with the writer's viewpoint, in order to become the first part of the essay.
The thesis statement of a strong compare-and-contrast essay should combine the topic with the writer's viewpoint.
What is a thesis statement?A thesis statement is known to be a kind of sentence that tells one about the central or key idea of a passage.
Note that it makes one to be able to control the ideas that are found in a paper and as such, looking at the above scenario, The thesis statement of a strong compare-and-contrast essay should combine the topic with the writer's viewpoint.
Learn more about thesis statement from
https://brainly.com/question/17915079
#SPJ5
Trick-or-treating—setting off on Halloween night in costume and ringing doorbells to demand treats—has been a tradition in the United States and other countries for more than a century. Its origins remain murky but traces can be identified in ancient Celtic festivals, early Roman Catholic holidays, medieval practices—and even British politics.
What surprised you about this paragraph?
pls help
What elements of a novel should you review to generate questions for a collaborative discussion
Answer:
Review the intro: Settings, characters and their traits.
Review the middle: Problems, Pressures.
Review the end: Solutions, Themes, and Lessons
Explanation:
review it Answer:
Explanation:
Write a thesis statement on whether failure can strengthen a person.
Answer:
Failure can strengthen a person because it creates a harsh determination, it is a humbling experience, and it teaches a lesson.
Explanation:
Jessie had felt sad all day. Jessie thought and thought about his situation and he thought to himself, I need to get myself together. Maria came in the door and asked what was wrong. He told her. Maria frowned. She felt as if she were being abandoned by everyone.
a) First-Person b) Second-Person c) Third-Person
Answer: I would have to say C
Explanation: Because when they thank there addressing there feelings using 3rd person point of view words like. he, and she.
Review the excerpt from Patrick Henry’s “St. John’s Church” speech:
No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.
Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it. I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free– if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending–if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained–we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!
Which of the following is an example of how to overcome intercultural communication barriers?
a. Accept culture shock
b. Become 'other' oriented
C. Require others to behave just like you
d. Assume differences
Answer:
B
Explanation: The reason comes from understanding what ethnocentrism is, and also what communication codes are, and are used for. Ethnocentrism is a concept that defines the act of a culture, or group of people, judging another from its preconcieved ideas, customs, traditions, and cultural characteristics. In essence, what happens in ethnocentrism is that a specific group of individuals with a common culture, believe themselves to be on top of all others, and judge everything from that standpoint, almost inferiorizing anything and everything done by someone outside of that superior culture.
Accept culture shock is an example of how to overcome intercultural communication barriers.
What is culture shock?"Culture shock describes the impact of moving from a familiar culture to one that is unfamiliar."
Accept culture shock is an example of how to overcome intercultural communication barriers because when a person accepts cultural challenges faced in a different culture then he is able to know the culture by trying to accept it by removing the intercultural communication barriers.
To learn more about culture shock here
https://brainly.com/question/25056299
#SPJ2
Who or what is the focus of part 1 of Julie of the wolves according to the novels table of contents
A) the wild life of Alaska
B) Miyaxs father
C) Amoraq the wold
D) Miyaxs childhood
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
its totally A cause they pretty much only talk about how she survives in alaska and how she communicates with the wolves.
we must reduce our daily expenses.( make it complex)
Answer: we definitely must reduce our daily expenses
Explanation:
Selection 1 is a Modern Gothic story. Using your knowledge of the characteristics of this genre, you can most reasonably predict that —
What was the answer?
What can readers infer from this description of Gatsby’s parties?
A. His parties are lavish and extravagant.
B. He spares no expense for his parties.
C. It is a fancy affair one would dress up for.
D. All of the above
Question 2:
Why do you think the author decided to have Gatsby formally invite Nick through a chauffeur rather than Gatsby personally inviting him?
A. To prove that Gatsby is not a caring person.
B. To add more mystery about Gatsby’s character
C. To show that Gatsby is a busy man.
D. To prove Gatsby’s wealth and power.
Question 3
What evidence proves the answer to the previous question?
A. "I had been actually invited."
B. "...the honor would be entirely Gatsby’s, it said, if I would attend his 'little party' that night."
C. "Sometimes they c
Answer:
No. 1:
A. His parties are lavish and extravagant
No. 2:
B. To add more mystery about Gatsby’s character
No. 3:
C. Sometimes they came and went without having met Gatsby at all, came for the party with a simplicity of heart that was its own ticket of admission.
Explanation:
What the readers can infer from this description of Gatsby’s parties is that "his parties are lavish and extravagant". The author describes the atmosphere to be elegant and extravagant. There's lots of music and dancing. It tends to symbolize the shallowness of the upper class.
The author decided to have Gatsby formally invite Nick through a chauffeur rather than Gatsby personally inviting him - this adds more mystery about Gatsby’s character. In the story, people that came for the party do not easily locate their host. This shows a mysterious part of Gatsby's character.
"The Great Gatsby" is a story by F. Scott Fitzgerald. The story tells of a man whose life was ordered by his desires.
Which choice provides the best evidence that this story is written from a first-person point of view?
Answer:
Thank you Bytefhf
The answer would be B
Explanation:
B. The story tells about something that happened in the past.
If it tells about a story in the past it probably is the character in the story therefore that would be first person.
B: The story tells about something that happened in the past.
how do Jim and the narrator make a living?
Answer:
i need more information
Answer:
Which book are you speaking of?
who or what is the focus of part 1 of Julie of the wolves according to the novels table of contents
Answer:
Enrichment/writing
Explanation:
It says in the table of contents that part one is Enrichment/writing comprehension.
Answer:
Amoraq the wolf
Explanation:
its in the table of contents
Which monarch was the target of the Gunpowder Plot? answer is James I ;D
Answer:
king james the l
Explanation:
Answer:
the right answer is James I.
You have to
up some toys to
make them go.
Add one letter.
with
Choose the response that shows the commas in the appropriate.
We had a telephone electricity and even hot water in our cabin.
We had a telephone, electricity, and even hot water in our cabin.
b. We had a telephone electricity, and even hot water in our cabin.
Correct
C.
Answer: We had a telephone, electricity, and even hot water in our cabin.
Explanation: In America, we use the Oxford comma, which goes between the second and third item in a list such as this one. Also, put the comma after the noun
analyze the way that dante introduces the character of virgil in canto I. Examine how the choices he makes introducing the character in this way affect the readers veiw of virgil. Be sure to use specific details from the text to support your answer.
can anyone help me i’m stuck!?!?
Answer:
Explanation:
Virgil was introduced as the perfect guide, the poet Virgil represents wisdom. Dante believes that the high morals and ethics of Virgil has not been appreciated in his time. Dante looks up to Virgil.
The readers can view Virgil as Dantes master, because Virgil always looks out for Dante's welfare. He can also be seen as the perfect guide for Dante. This is evident in the text where; "Dante begins to feel hopeless in his plight, a figure approaches him. At first Dante is afraid but then implores it for help. whether it be man or spirit. it answered:"not a man now, but once i was." It is the shade of Virgil who wrote the Arneid and lived in the times of the "Lying and false gods." Dante sees Virgil as his master and the inspiration for his works.
Which is the best explanation of how the main character helps to reveal the
theme?
A. Jack's ability to gather evidence shows that some people have
· surprising talents.
B. Jack's work as a page shows that hard work and determination
pay off.
C. Jack's treatment as a hero shows that honesty is always the best
policy.
D. Jack's dream of becoming a knight shows that you can do
anything you put your mind to.
Answer:Its A
Explanation:Jacks ability to gather evidence shows that some people have surprising talents
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Just did it
What is the meaning of the word dwelt as used in paragraph one?
Answer: Dwell? you mean?
"I've got better things to do than dwell on the past"
Explanation:
think, speak, or write at length about (a particular subject, especially one that is a source of unhappiness, anxiety, or dissatisfaction).
Answer:
reside or live
correct???
C.
Analysis means:
a. to hear something and be able to remember it to change the subject
b. to break something into its component parts in d. to create a new literary work filled with good
order to understand it better
ideas
Answer: The answer is b.
Explanation:
All of the following describe a budget appropriately EXCEPT:
A.
It is the best tool to help you get more for your money.
B.
It is setting limits and restrictions on your money and doesn't do anything else.
C.
It helps keep track of your money so you know where it is going.
D.
It helps you save for both short-term and long-term financial goals.
Answer:
the correct answer is A.