Help help help almost done thanks

Answer:

First equation is already in slope-intercept form

The y-intercept of the first equation is (0,4)

The slope of the first equation is -2

Second equation is y= -1/2x-2 in slope-intercept form

The y-intercept of the second equation is (0,-2)

The slope of the second equation is -1/2

Answer:

16 trees

Step-by-step explanation:

1. First, let's find the positive factors of 352.

2. Now, let's find the two factors that have one number 6 more than the other.

3. Okay, 16 and 22 have one number that's 6 more than the other. Since the number of rows exceeds the number of trees per row by 6, 22 is the number of rows, and there are 16 trees in each row.

Step-by-step explanation:

I caught it bad yesterday

You hit me with a call to your place

Ain't been out in a while anyway

Was hoping I could catch you throwing smiles in my face

Answer:

3900 x.094 = 366.60

366.6+3900=4266.60

Answer:

8/5+7/3=24/15+35/15=59/15

Step-by-step explanation:

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

There are numerous possible solutions. Perhaps the simplest is to look at what happens to x in the expression for h(x).

This suggests that f(x) will square the result of g(x), and that g(x) will add 1 to x:

  g(x) = x +1

  f(x) = x²

__

Check

  h(x) = f(g(x)) = f(x+1) = (x+1)² . . . . as required

_____

Additional comment

For some (almost) arbitrary function g(x), the function f(x) can include its inverse (to get the value of x+1), then perform the square. If g(x) involves powers of x, then f(x) only needs to do enough of an inverse to find (x+1)². Here's a relatively simple example.

  g(x) = 2x+3

  f(x) = (x -1)²/4

Then h(x) = f(g(x)) = f(2x +3) = ((2x +3) -1)²/4 = (2(x+1))²/4 = (x+1)²

Answer:

i do just simplyfy it that the easeasttttttt way am always. here to help i will be your persenol assitent

Step-by-step explanation:

likeeee eomg simplify to it yea i will always helpppppp youuu i likeee helppppppppppppppinggg

Using the binomial distribution, it is found that:

a) There is a 0.0162 = 1.62% probability that among 12 randomly observed individuals, exactly 7 do not cover their mouth when sneezing.

b) There is a 0.5958 = 59.58% probability that among 12 randomly observed individuals, fewer than 5 do not cover their mouth when sneezing.

c) The probability is higher than 5%, so it would not be unusual.

Binomial probability distribution

The binomial probability is the probability of exactly x successes on n repeated trials, with p probability.

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]  

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]  

In this problem:

Item a:

This probability is P(X = 7), so:

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 7) = C_{12,7}.(0.267)^{7}.(0.733)^{5} = 0.0162[/tex]

There is a 0.0162 = 1.62% probability that among 12 randomly observed individuals, exactly 7 do not cover their mouth when sneezing.

Item b:

The probability is P(X < 4), which is:

[tex]P(X < 4) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2) + P(X = 3)[/tex]

Then

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 0) = C_{12,0}.(0.267)^{0}.(0.733)^{12} = 0.0241[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 1) = C_{12,1}.(0.267)^{1}.(0.733)^{11} = 0.1052[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 2) = C_{12,2}.(0.267)^{2}.(0.733)^{10} = 0.2107[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 3) = C_{12,3}.(0.267)^{3}.(0.733)^{9} = 0.2558[/tex]

Then

[tex]P(X < 4) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2) + P(X = 3) = 0.0241 + 0.1052 + 0.2107 + 0.2558 = 0.5958[/tex]

There is a 0.5958 = 59.58% probability that among 12 randomly observed individuals, fewer than 5 do not cover their mouth when sneezing.

Item c:

This probability is:

[tex]P(X < 6) = P(X < 4) + P(X = 5) = 0.5958 + P(X = 5)[/tex]

Negative probabilities do no exist, thus, this probability is guaranteed to be above 0.05, which means that it would not be unusual if fewer than half covered their mouth when sneezing.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/24923631

Step-by-step explanation:

The number of employees before the layoff = 2000

"It is a number can be expressed as a fraction of 100."

For given question,

Let 'n' be the the number of employees before layoff.

A company laid off 80% of its work force.

The number of employees after the layoff is 400.

The number of employees after the layoff would be,

⇒ n - (80 percent of n) = 400

[tex]\Rightarrow n-(n\times \frac{80}{100} )=400\\\\\Rightarrow n[1-0.8]=400\\\\\Rightarrow n\times 0.2=400\\\\\Rightarrow n=2000[/tex]

Therefore, the number of employees before the layoff = 2000

Learn more about percentage here:

https://brainly.com/question/22111589

#SPJ3

nahhhh man ain't answering that lololollozz

Answer:

45 - big boxes, 200 - small boxes

Step-by-step explanation:

45 x 10 = 450

200 x 20 = 4000

Total = 4,450

Hope it's correct

Answer:

Even

Step-by-step explanation:

One basket has 9 berries. Since there are two baskets, the equayion is 9x2=18. 18 is an eben number.

Answer:

34°

Step-by-step explanation:

1. First, let's find the measure of ∠1 because since r || s, that means ∠1 = ∠7 because they're both alternate exterior angles. Alternate exterior angles are congruent.

2. (Solving for ∠1)

3. Now, since we know ∠1 = ∠7, ∠7 = 34°.

Answer:

The sum of the outer angles of polygon is twice the sum of the inner angles. (i) How many sides does it have? (ii) What if the sum of outer angles

Answer:

The second and the third one

Step-by-step explanation:

You can count seven spaces up from the train tracks and four spaces right of the buss line.

Answer:

22.05

Step-by-step explanation:

21x150%=31.5

31.5×30%=9.45

31.5-9.45=22.05

Answer:

-$16, $2, $11, and hope this helps

Answer:

-$16, $2, $15, and $11.

Answer:

1995, because you were paying $1.96 for 1 CPi, now you are paying around $1.16

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

i have no "porra(translate from portuguese)" of idea

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$10

Step-by-step explanation:

Each mitt was sold for $10 each.

First, add the total of the money she made off of all three mittens (23+7=30) this equation gives you the amount of money that Quinn got for all three mitts.

Then, to find the value of each mitt, take the total of all the mitts and divide it by the number of mitts (30÷3=10)

This gives you the answer that each mitt was $10

The cost of each softball mitt is $10.

We have Quinn sold 3 of her old softball mitts at Mickey's Secondhand Thrift Mart. Before she left, she spent $23 of her earnings on a used batting helmet. Now, She has $7 remaining with her.

We have the cost of each softball mitt.

The cost price (C.P.) is equal to selling price (S.P.). Therefore -

Profit = SP - CP = 0

Hence, the profit percentage is zero.

According to the question -

Assume that the cost of 3 softballs is $x.

Cost of batting helmet = $23

Money remaining = $7

Therefore, the following equation can be used to represent the situation-

x - 23 = 7

x = 30

Now -

cost of 3 soft balls = 30

cost of 1 soft ball will be = 30/3 = 10

Hence, the cost of each softball mitt is $10.

To solve more questions on Expression modelling, visit the link below-

brainly.com/question/20876878

#SPJ2

Answer:

The value of 9 + c= 14 because 9 + 5=14

Answer:y =12/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y= 2-x/6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: can you do 1 2 and 3 ​

Step-by-step explanation:

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  I. 0.540; II. 0.694; III. 0.306; IV. 0.334; V. 0.177 ≠ 0.306 (not independent)

Step-by-step explanation:

I. P(ring) = 1100/2036 = 275/509 ≈ 0.540

The probability that a randomly selected bottle will have its ring attached is the ratio of such bottles to the total number of bottles: 1100/2036 ≈ 0.540.

__

II. P(PET∨ring) = 1 -P(HDPE∧no ring) = 1 -623/2036 = 1413/2036 ≈ 0.694

The probability that a random bottle is PET or has the ring attached is the ratio of such bottles to the total: 1413/2036 ≈ 0.694.

__

III. P(HDPE∧no ring) = 623/2036 ≈ 0.306

The probability that a random bottle is HDPE and has the ring removed is the ratio of such bottles to the total number of bottles: 623/2036 ≈ 0.306.

__

IV. P(PET | no ring) = P(PET∧no ring)/P(no ring) = 313/936 ≈ 0.334

The probability that a random bottle is PET given that it has no ring is the ratio of ringless PET bottles to the total number of ringless bottles: 313/936 ≈ 0.334.

__

V. P(ringless) = 936/2036 ≈ 0.460

  P(HDPE) = 890/2036 ≈ 0.386

  P(ringless)×P(HDPE) = 0.460×0.386 ≈ 0.177 ≠ P(HDPE∧no ring) = 0.306

If events A and B are independent, the probability of the joint event A∧B is the product of the probabilities of the individual events. Here the probability of an HDPE bottle having no ring is about 0.306, while the product of probabilities that a bottle is HDPE and that a bottle has no ring is about 0.177. "Ring removed" and "HDPE bottle type" are not independent.

_____

Attached is the recommended cross tabulation table. The numbers in blue are given in the problem statement (623 = 70%×890). The numbers in black are the numbers required in order to achieve the given totals.