HELLP ASAP PLEASE!!!

Answer:

A.

y = 0.28x + 0.75

Step-by-step explanation:

Check all that applies using teaspoons of baking powder, x = 5

A.

y = 0.28x + 0.75

When x = 5

y = 0.28x + 0.75

= 0.28(5) + 0.75

= 1.4 + 0.75

y = 2.15

B.

y = 0.75x +0.56

When x = 5

y = 0.75x +0.56

= 0.75(5) + 0.56

= 3.75 + 0.56

= 4.31

C.

y = 0.75x + 0.28

When x = 5

y = 0.75x + 0.28

= 0.75(5) + 0.28

= 3.75 + 0.28

= 4.03

D.

y = 0.56x + 0.75

When x = 5

y = 0.56x + 0.75

= 0.56(5) + 0.75

= 2.8 + 0.75

= 3.55

The equation represents the height of fudge brownies with x teaspoons of baking powder is

y = 0.28x + 0.75

Answer:

7aabbbjdkdbdjdkxbsks n sbs

Answer:

The change in delta x would be 0 in the second option because the change is exactly the same.

Answer:

what is the answerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Step-by-step explanation:

The volume of the cooler is 2772 in³

Volume is the amount of space taken up by an object

The formula for calculating the volume of a rectangular prism is volume = length × width × height.

According to the question

Length= 22in.

breadth= 12 in.

width= 10 1/2  in. or 21/2 in.

So, the volume= 22× 12× (21/2)

                        =2772 in³

Thus the volume of a rectangular prism is 2772 in³

To check more about rectangular prism click here

https://brainly.com/question/21308855

#SPJ2

Answer:

It takes him 15 minutes.

Step-by-step explanation:

Donnie clean the llama pen in 180 minutes on his own.

What is an expression?

Mathematical expression is defined as the collection of the numbers variables and functions by using operations like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

Given that;

Daniel and Donnie can clean the llama pen in 45 minutes.

And, On his own, Daniel can clean the pen in an hour.

Now,

Let time to clean the llama pen in on his own = x minutes.

Since, Daniel and Donnie can clean the llama pen in 45 minutes.

So, In 1 minute, Daniel and Donnie clean the pen = 1/45

And, In 1 minute Daniel to work = 1/60

Thus, We can formulate;

1/x + 1/60 = 1/45

Solve for x as;

(60 + x) / 60x = 1/45

60 + x = 60x / 45

60 + x = 4x/3

180 + 3x = 4x

180 = 4x - 3x

180 = x

Thus, Donnie clean the llama pen in 180 minutes on his own.

Learn more about the mathematical expression visit:

brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ5

Answer:

(A) 22

(B) 12

Step-by-step explanation:

Jada makes sparkling juice by mixing 3 cups of sparkling water and 5 cups of Apple juice

(A) Jada uses 30 cups of Apple juice,the amount of sparkling water needed is

3+5

= 8

30-8

= 22

(B) 9+3

= 12

Answer:

72 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 34 hours

Step-by-step explanation: 68 divided by 34 is 2 and thats the rate the temperature is dropping.

To test the claim that the incidence of malaria is lower for infants using bednets, a hypothesis test is conducted using the given data. The test statistic is calculated and compared to the critical value at a significance level of 0.01.

The null hypothesis (H0) assumes that the incidence of malaria is the same for infants using bednets and those not using bednets. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) suggests that the incidence of malaria is lower for infants using bednets.

To conduct the hypothesis test, the test statistic can be calculated using the formula:

test statistic (p) = (p1 - p2) / sqrt[(p(1 - p) / n1) + (p(1 - p) / n2)]

Where:

p1 = proportion of infants using bednets who developed malaria

p2 = proportion of infants not using bednets who developed malaria

n1 = number of infants using bednets

n2 = number of infants not using bednets

Using the given data, the test statistic is computed as:

p = (10/320) - (24/279) / sqrt[((10+24)/(320+279)) * (1 - ((10+24)/(320+279))) * ((1/320) + (1/279))]

By comparing the calculated test statistic with the critical value at a significance level of 0.01, a conclusion can be made regarding the effectiveness of bednets in reducing malaria incidence.

If the test statistic falls within the critical region (beyond the critical value), the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis, indicating that the bednets appear to be effective in reducing malaria incidence. Conversely, if the test statistic does not fall within the critical region, there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that the bednets may not be effective in reducing malaria incidence.

Learn more about test statistic (p) here:

https://brainly.com/question/30810251

#SPJ11

Answer:

Option B

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex](q + p)q = (s + r)s[/tex]

Lets open the brackets of L.H.S.

[tex]=> q^2 + pq = (s+ r)s[/tex]

Lets substract q² from both the sides.

[tex]=> q^2 + pq - q^2 = (s + r)s - q^2[/tex]

[tex]=> pq = (s + r)s - q^2[/tex]

Lets divide both the sides by q.

[tex]=> \frac{pq}{q} = \frac{(s + r)s - q^2}{q}[/tex]

[tex]=> p = \frac{(s + r)s }{q} - \frac{q^2}{q} = \frac{(s + r)s}{q} - q[/tex]

Answer: 60

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1/12 a cup

Step-by-step explanation:

1/3*1/4=1/12

Answer:

1/12

Step-by-step explanation:

1/3*1/4=1/12

Answer:

45 and 13…......

Step-by-step explanation:

devide

Answer:

Bowling ball

Step-by-step explanation:

A bowling ball has much more mass than all three of the other choices and the amount of kinetic energy is determined based on a object's mass and velocity, but in this case, all 4 balls are traveling at the same velocity. Therefore, we know that the bowling ball has much more mass so therefore it has the most kinetic energy.  

By introducing the appropriate change of variable x = t + 2, we transformed the given integral [, sin(x - 2) dx] into S1, g(t)dt = [, sin(t) dt], where g(t) = sin(t). (option a)

To transform the given integral [, sin(x - 2) dx] into the form S1, g(t)dt, we need to apply a suitable change of variable. In this case, we'll introduce a new variable, t, and express x in terms of t. Let's denote this change of variable as x = h(t), where h(t) represents the transformation of t to x.

To determine the appropriate change of variable, we can start by looking at the expression inside the sine function: x - 2. We need to find a suitable expression for x that can help us simplify the integral. Let's set x - 2 equal to t:

x - 2 = t.

Now, we solve this equation for x to express it in terms of t:

x = t + 2.

Next, we differentiate both sides of the equation x = t + 2 with respect to t to find dx/dt:

dx/dt = d(t + 2)/dt.

Differentiating t + 2 with respect to t gives us:

dx/dt = 1.

Now, we have dx/dt = 1, which means dx = dt. We can substitute this value into the original integral:

[, sin(x - 2) dx] = [, sin(t) dt].

As you can see, the original integral [, sin(x - 2) dx] has been transformed into the form [, sin(t) dt] using the appropriate change of variable x = t + 2. Therefore, the integral S1, g(t)dt is now:

S1 = [, sin(t) dt],

and g(t) = sin(t).

Hence the correct option is (a).

To know more about integral here

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ4

Step-by-step explanation:

mad = 98 + 92 + 96 + 97 + 97 / 5

= 480/5

= 96

mad = (98 -96) + (92 - 96) + (96 -96) + (97- 96) + (97 -96) / 5

= 2 + (-4) + 0 + 1 + 1 / 5

=0/5

mad = 0

brainliest is appreciated

Answer:

1.6

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the mean absolute deviation of the data, start by finding the mean of the data set. Find the sum of the data values, and divide the sum by the number of data values. Find the absolute value of the difference between each data value and the mean: |data value – mean|.

98+92+96+97+97=480

480/5 values=96 is the mean or average of the set of numbers

so we just find the absolute value of the data value minus the mean.

For the first one it would be |98-96|=2

then continue on and get a set of values

{2,4,0,1,1}

now find the average of that to get the mean absolute deviation

2+4+0+1+1=8

8/5 values

1.6

Hope that helps :)

Can you post a picture?

It would make it so much easier.

the confidence interval (0.069, 0.159) can be expressed as 0.114 ± 0.045

In a confidence interval, the lower bound represents the point estimate minus the margin of error, and the upper bound represents the point estimate plus the margin of error. In this case, the lower bound of the confidence interval is 0.069 and the upper bound is 0.159. To express it in the form of p ± E, we need to find the point estimate and the margin of error.

The point estimate, p, is the average or central value of the interval. In this case, it would be the midpoint between the lower and upper bounds:

p = (0.069 + 0.159) / 2 = 0.114

The margin of error, E, can be calculated by taking half the difference between the upper and lower bounds:

E = (0.159 - 0.069) / 2 = 0.045

Therefore, the confidence interval (0.069, 0.159) can be expressed as 0.114 ± 0.045.

Learn more about confidence interval here:

https://brainly.com/question/32546207

#SPJ11

Answer:

9.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 2/15

Step-by-step explanation:

Experimental probability is the actual results of the experiment (not what should have happened, which is theoretical probability.

A 3 was rolled 8 times, so the results are 8/60=4/30=2/15

Answer:

120:72:48

Step-by-step explanation:

Remark

Whatever the answer is (call it x to begin with), the equation starts as

5x + 3x + 2x = 240

What this means is that when you solve for x the results when multiplied by the ratio, should add to 240

Equation

5x + 3x + 2x = 240

Solution

Combine all the terms on the left.

10x = 240                    Divide by 10

x = 240/10

x = 24

Check

Answer:

answer is on this page

Step-by-step explanation:

https://www.mathpapa.com/algebra-calculator.html

Answer:

340

Step-by-step explanation

Base=10x10=100

Sides= {(12x10)/2}x4=240

Add sides plus base, 240+100=340

To test whether one type of high school better equips students to attain high academic honors at a college, we can compare the observed proportions of Honors Graduates from different high school types to the expected proportions based on the overall distribution. Using a chi-squared test, the hypothesis test assesses whether the observed differences are statistically significant.

To test the hypothesis, we set up the null hypothesis (H0) that the type of high school attended does not affect the likelihood of attaining high academic honors. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) states that there is a significant association between high school type and academic honors.
Using the given information, we calculate the expected number of Honors Graduates for each high school type based on the overall distribution of high school attendance. Then, we compare the observed and expected frequencies using a chi-squared test. The test evaluates the difference between the observed and expected counts to determine if it is statistically significant.If the chi-squared test results in a p-value below a predetermined significance level (e.g., 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that there is evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.

This would indicate that one type of high school may better equip students to attain high academic honors at the college. Conversely, if the p-value is above the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that there is insufficient evidence to conclude a significant association between high school type and academic honors.
To draw a conclusion, we would need to perform the chi-squared test and compare the calculated p-value to the chosen significance level.

Learn more about chi-squared test here
https://brainly.com/question/30760432



#SPJ11

The final answer of the question which is the specific form of the solution u(x, t) = X(x)T(t)

What is the quadratic equation?

The solutions to the quadratic equation are the values of the unknown variable x, which satisfy the equation. These solutions are called roots or zeros of quadratic equations. The roots of any polynomial are the solutions for the given equation.

To separate variables in the partial differential equation t²uxx + x²ux²t - x²zzut = 0, we assume that the solution can be written as a product of two functions, u(x, t) = X(x)T(t).

Let's begin by substituting this into the given equation:

t²(X''(x)T(t)) + x²(X(x)T'(t)) - x^2(X(x)T(t)) = 0

Now, we divide the equation by t²X(x)T(t) to separate the variables:

(X''(x) / X(x)) + (x^2 / t^2)(T'(t) / T(t)) - (x^2 / t^2) = 0

Next, we rearrange the terms:

(X''(x) / X(x)) + ((x² / t²)(T'(t) / T(t))) - (x² / t²) = 0

To satisfy this equation for all x and t, the left-hand side and the right-hand side must be equal to a constant value. Let's call this constant -λ^2:

(X''(x) / X(x)) + ((x² / t²)(T'(t) / T(t))) - (x² / t²) = -λ²

Now, we have two separate ordinary differential equations:

1. X''(x) / X(x) - x² / t² = -λ²

2. T'(t) / T(t) = λ²

Solving each equation separately will give us the general solutions for X(x) and T(t).

The general solution for u(x, t) can then be obtained by taking the product of X(x) and T(t):

u(x, t) = X(x)T(t)

The specific form of the solutions will depend on the boundary conditions or initial conditions given for the problem.

Hence, the final answer of the question which is the specific form of the solution u(x, t) = X(x)T(t)

To learn more about the quadratic equation visit:

brainly.com/question/28038123

#SPJ4

Answer:

D. 9p + $11.50 = $94.75; p = $9.25

Step-by-step explanation:

To answer this problem, let p be the price of each scrub. The total bill (t) is the sum of the price of the potting soil (s) and of the 9 scrubs (n). This is depicted in the equation,

                                $11.50 + 9p = $94.75

The value of p from the equation is 9.25. Thus, each scrub costs $9.25. The answer is letter D.

...................................................................................................................................................

Let

p---------> the price of each scrub

s----------> the price of the potting soil

T--------> total bill

we know that

in this problem

substitute the values in the formula above

solve for p

therefore

the answer is the option D

calculista

Genius

19K answers

437.3M people helped